1. Can hydrological models assess the impact of natural flood management in groundwater‐dominated catchments?
- Author
-
Hèou Maléki Badjana, Hannah L. Cloke, Anne Verhoef, Stefan Julich, Carla Camargos, Sarah Collins, David M. J. Macdonald, Patrick C. McGuire, and Joanna Clark
- Subjects
hydrological model ,lowland catchment ,modelling framework ,natural flood management ,uncertainties ,River protective works. Regulation. Flood control ,TC530-537 ,Disasters and engineering ,TA495 - Abstract
Abstract Natural flood management (NFM) is widely promoted for managing flood risks but the effectiveness of different types of NFM schemes at medium (100–1000 km2) and large scales (>1000 km2) remains widely unknown. This study demonstrates the importance of fully understanding the impact of model structure, calibration and uncertainty techniques on the results before the NFM assessment is undertaken. Land‐based NFM assessment is undertaken in two medium‐scale lowland catchments within the Thames River basin (UK) with a modelling approach that uses the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model within an uncertainty framework. The model performed poorly in groundwater‐dominated areas (P‐factor 0.6). The model performed better in areas dominated by surface and interflow processes (P‐factor >0.5 and R‐factor
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF