Search

Serotonin producing pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (SP-PanNET) account for 0.58-1.4% of all pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNET). They may present with atypical symptoms, such as acute pancreatitis and are often radiologically characterized by main pancreatic duct dilatation. SP-PanNET are well differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NET) distinct from classical PanNET by atypical serotonin secretion and abundant dense stroma deposition, like serotonin producing ileal NET leading in some cases to difficulties to reliably distinguish SP-PanNET from ileal NET metastases. The biology and molecular profile of SP-PanNET remain poorly characterized and the cell of origin within the pancreas is unclear. To address these questions, we analyzed a large cohort of SP-PanNET by immunohistochemistry (n = 29; ATRX, DAXX, MENIN, Islet1, PAX6, PDX1, ARX, CDX2), whole genome copy number array (Oncoscan™) and a large NGS panel (NovoPM™) (n = 10), FISH (n = 13) and RNA sequencing (n = 24) together with 21 ileal NET and 29 nonfunctioning PanNET (NF-PanNET). These analyses revealed a unique genomic profile with frequent isolated loss of chromosome 1 (14 cases-61%) and few pathogenic mutations (KMT2C in 2 cases, ARID1A in 1 case). Unsupervised RNAseq-based clustering showed that SP-PanNET were closer to NF-PanNET than ileal NET with an exclusive beta cell-like signature. SP-PanNET showed TGF-β pathway activation signatures associated with extracellular matrix remodeling and similar signature were reproduced in vitro when pancreatic stellate cells were exposed to serotonin. SP-PanNET immunohistochemical profile resemble that of ileal NET except for PDX1 and PAX6 expression to a lesser extend suggesting that these two markers may be useful to diagnose SP-PanNET. Taken together, this suggests that SP-PanNET are a very specific PanNET entity with a peculiar biology leading to the characteristic fibrotic aspect.

Isolated hepatic localizations of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are generally considered as metastatic NETs of unknown primary but could correspond to primary hepatic NETs (PHNETs), a poorly explored entity. We aimed to describe the clinicopathological and molecular features of PHNETs and compare them with other primary NETs. We assembled a retrospective cohort of patients managed for hepatic localization of NET without extra-hepatic primary tumor after exhaustive clinical, imaging, and immunohistochemical characterization. We performed whole-exome sequencing with mutational and copy number analysis. Transcriptomic profiles were compared with pancreatic (n = 31), small-bowel (n = 22), and lung (n = 15) NETs using principal component analysis, unsupervised clustering, and gene set enrichment analysis. Among 27 screened patients, 16 had PHNET (solitary tumor in 63%, median size 11 cm, G2 NETs in 81%) following clinical and pathological review. DNA analyses showed 'foregut-like' genomic profiles with frequent alterations in pathways of Fanconi DNA repair (75%), histone modifiers (58%), adherens junctions (58%), and cell cycle control (50%). The most frequently involved genes were KMT2A (58%), ATM (42%), CDH1, CDKN2C, FANCF, and MEN1 (33% each). Transcriptomic analyses showed that PHNETs clustered closer to foregut (pancreatic, lung) NETs than to midgut (small-bowel) NETs, while remaining a distinct entity with a specific profile. Assessment of potentially predictive biomarkers suggested efficacy of treatments usually active in foregut NETs. In conclusion, PHNETs display a foregut-like molecular profile distinct from other types of NETs, with recurrent molecular alterations. Upon exhaustive work-up to exclude an unrecognized primary tumor, PHNETs should not be considered metastatic NETs from an unknown primary. © 2022 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

NCL blocking antibody and Ncl deletion affects PDAC cell proliferation.

Proteome array analysis of angiogenic molecules secreted by ECs.

mPDAC orthopic model characterization.

N6L inhibits PDAC proliferation and migration

Pancreatic cancer is a highly aggressive tumor, mostly resistant to the standard treatments. Nucleolin is overexpressed in cancers and its inhibition impairs tumor growth. Herein, we showed that nucleolin was overexpressed in human specimens of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and that the overall survival significantly increased in patients with low levels of nucleolin. The nucleolin antagonist N6L strongly impaired the growth of primary tumors and liver metastasis in an orthotopic mouse model of PDAC (mPDAC). Similar antitumor effect of N6L has been observed in a highly angiogenic mouse model of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor RIP-Tag2. N6L significantly inhibited both human and mouse pancreatic cell proliferation and invasion. Notably, the analysis of tumor vasculature revealed a strong increase of pericyte coverage and vessel perfusion both in mPDAC and RIP-Tag2 tumors, in parallel to an inhibition of tumor hypoxia. Nucleolin inhibition directly affected endothelial cell (EC) activation and changed a proangiogenic signature. Among the vascular activators, nucleolin inhibition significantly decreased angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) secretion and expression in ECs, in the tumor and in the plasma of mPDAC mice. As a consequence of the observed N6L-induced tumor vessel normalization, pre-treatment with N6L efficiently improved chemotherapeutic drug delivery and increased the antitumor properties of gemcitabine in PDAC mice. In conclusion, nucleolin inhibition is a new anti-pancreatic cancer therapeutic strategy that dually blocks tumor progression and normalizes tumor vasculature, improving the delivery and efficacy of chemotherapeutic drugs. Moreover, we unveiled Ang-2 as a potential target and suitable response biomarker for N6L treatment in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res; 76(24); 7181–93. ©2016 AACR.

N6L and angiogenic molecules regulation.

The Supplementary data contains the methods and the Supplementary figure legends

Stroma NCL inhibition increases pericyte coverage of tumor blood vessels.

The CXCL4 paralog CXCL4L1 is a less studied chemokine that has been suggested to exert an antiangiogenic function. However, CXCL4L1 is also expressed in patient tumors, tumor cell lines, and murine xenografts, prompting a more detailed analysis of its role in cancer pathogenesis. We used genetic and antibody-based approaches to attenuate CXCL4L1 in models of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Mechanisms of expression were assessed in cell coculture experiments, murine, and avian xenotransplants, including through an evaluation of CpG methylation and mutation of critical CpG residues. CXCL4L1 gene expression was increased greatly in primary and metastatic PDAC. We found that myofibroblasts triggered cues in the tumor microenvironment, which led to induction of CXCL4L1 in tumor cells. CXCL4L1 expression was also controlled by epigenetic modifications at critical CpG islands, which were mapped. CXCL4L1 inhibited angiogenesis but also affected tumor development more directly, depending on the tumor cell type. In vivo administration of an mAb against CXCL4L1 demonstrated a blockade in the growth of tumors positive for CXCR3, a critical receptor for CXCL4 ligands. Our findings define a protumorigenic role in PDAC development for endogenous CXCL4L1, which is independent of its antiangiogenic function. Cancer Res; 76(22); 6507–19. ©2016 AACR.

Characterization of CXCR3 overexpression in MIA PaCa-2 cells in vitro

Supplemental Material and Method section

Background & AimsAlthough specialized and dedicated to the production of digestive enzymes, pancreatic acinar cells harbor a high plasticity and are able to modify their identity. They undergo reversible acinar-to-ductal cell metaplasia (ADM) through epigenetic silencing of the acinar lineage gene program mainly controlled by PTF1a (Pancreas Transcription Factor 1a). ADM becomes irreversible in the presence of oncogenic Kras mutations and leads to the formation of preneoplastic lesions. We investigated the role of the E3 ubiquitin ligase Thyroid hormone Receptor Interacting Protein 12 (TRIP12), involved in PTF1a degradation, in pancreatic carcinogenesis.MethodsWe used genetically engineered mouse models of pancreas-selective Trip12 deletion, mutant Kras (G12D) and mutant Trp53 (R172H). We performed RNA sequencing analysis from acinar cells and cell lines derived from mice models tumors. We investigated the impact of TRIP12 deficiency on acute pancreatitis, tumor formation and metastasis development.ResultsTRIP12 is overexpressed in human pancreatic preneoplastic lesions and tumors. We show that a conditional deletion of TRIP12 in the pancreas during murine embryogenesis alters pancreas homeostasis and acinar cell genes expression patterns in adults. EGF induced-ADM is suppressed in TRIP12-depleted pancreatic acini. In vivo, a loss of TRIP12 prevents acini to develop ADM in response to pancreatic injury, the formation of Kras-induced pancreatic preneoplastic lesions, and impairs tumors and metastasis formation in the presence of mutated Trp53. TRIP12 is required for Claudin18.2 isoform expression in pancreatic tumors cells.ConclusionsOur study identifies TRIP12 as a novel regulator of acinar fate in the adult pancreas with an important dual role in pancreatic carcinogenesis, in initiation steps and in metastatic behavior of tumor cells.SynopsisThis study shows that Thyroid hormone Receptor Interacting Protein 12 plays an important dual role in the initiation steps and invasion of pancreatic carcinogenesis. Moreover, expression of TRIP12 switches on the expression of Claudin-18, a targetable biomarker of pancreatic tumors.

High-grade (HG) gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are rare but have a very poor prognosis and represent a severely understudied class of tumours. Molecular data for HG GEP-NEN are limited, and treatment strategies for the carcinoma subgroup (HG GEP-NEC) are extrapolated from small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). After pathological re-evaluation, we analysed DNA from tumours and matched blood samples from 181 HG GEP-NEN patients; 152 neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) and 29 neuroendocrine tumours (NET G3). Based on the sequencing of 360 cancer-related genes, we assessed mutations and copy number alterations (CNA). For NEC, frequently mutated genes were TP53 (64%), APC (28%), KRAS (22%) and BRAF (20%). RB1 was only mutated in 14%, but CNAs affecting RB1 were seen in 34%. Other frequent copy number losses were ARID1A (35%), ESR1 (25%) and ATM (31%). Frequent amplifications/gains were found in MYC (51%) and KDM5A (45%). While these molecular features had limited similarities with SCLC, we found potentially targetable alterations in 66% of the NEC samples. Mutations and CNA varied according to primary tumour site with BRAF mutations mainly seen in colon (49%), and FBXW7 mutations mainly seen in rectal cancers (25%). Eight out of 152 (5.3%) NEC were microsatellite instable (MSI). NET G3 had frequent mutations in MEN1 (21%), ATRX (17%), DAXX, SETD2 and TP53 (each 14%). We show molecular differences in HG GEP-NEN, related to morphological differentiation and site of origin. Limited similarities to SCLC and a high fraction of targetable alterations indicate a high potential for better-personalized treatments.

PURPOSE Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (GEP-NEC) are rare and have a poor prognosis. Most GEP-NEC are diagnosed with metastatic disease, with only minor biopsies available for molecular diagnostics. We assessed the applicability of liquid biopsies for molecular profiling of GEP-NEC. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed massive parallel sequencing of 76 cancer-related genes in circulating tumor DNA from 50 patients with advanced GEP-NEC and compared findings to previous analyses of solid tumor biopsies from the same patients. Plasma samples were collected before therapy, and the median time span between blood and tissue sampling was 25 days. RESULTS We detected 178 somatic mutations in the liquid biopsies, 127 (71%) were also detected in the solid biopsies, whereas 51 (29%) were unique to the liquid biopsies. In the same 76 genes, we previously detected 199 somatic mutations (single nucleotide variants) in solid biopsies, of which 127 (64%) were also now detected in liquid biopsies. In exploratory subgroup assessments, concordance was higher in patients with liver metastases ( P = 1.5 × 10–5) and increasing with level of liver involvement ( P = 1.2 × 10–4). The concordance was similar between GEP-NEC with different primary sites, except being lower in esophageal cases ( P = .001). Concordance was not associated with tumor mutation burden. Tumor tissue mutations also detected in liquid biopsies was lower for MSI (40%) versus MSS tumors (70%; P = 7.8 × 10–4). We identified potentially targetable mutations in plasma of 26 (52%) of patients with GEP-NEC; nine patients (18%) had potentially targetable mutation detected only in liquid biopsies. CONCLUSION Liquid biopsy analyses may be an applicable alternative to solid biopsies in GEP-NEC. Liquid biopsies may add additional mutations compared with tumor biopsies alone and could be useful for biomarker assessment in clinical trials for these patients.

This ENETS guidance paper, developed by a multidisciplinary working group, provides up-to-date and practical advice on the diagnosis and management of digestive neuroendocrine carcinoma, based on recent developments and study results. These recommendations aim to pave the road for more standardized care for our patients resulting in improved outcomes. Prognosis is generally poor for digestive NEC, most are advanced at diagnosis and median survival in metastatic disease is 11-12 months. Surgery can be of benefit for localized disease after extensive preoperative imaging. Carboplatin in combination with etoposide is recommended as first-line treatment for metastatic disease. Irinotecan with fluoropyrimidines has the best evidence as second-line treatment. Immunotherapy plays a minor role in biomarker-unselected patients. Molecular profiling if available is encouraged to identify new targets. More prospective clinical trials are highly needed to fulfil the unmet needs in this field, especially on new predictive and prognostic biomarkers and to improve survival of patients with advanced disease.

There is no standardized treatment for grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors (G3 NETs). We aimed to describe the treatments received in patients with advanced G3 NETs and compare their efficacy. Patients with advanced digestive G3 NETs treated between 2010 and 2018 in seven expert centers were retrospectively studied. Pathological samples were centrally reviewed, and radiological data were locally reviewed. We analyzed RECIST-defined objective response (OR), tumor growth rate (TGR) and progression-free survival (PFS) obtained with first- (L1) or second-line (L2) treatments. We included 74 patients with advanced G3 NETs, mostly from the duodenal or pancreatic origin (71.6%), with median Ki-67 of 30%. The 126 treatments (L1 = 74; L2 = 52) included alkylating-based (n = 32), etoposide-platinum (n = 22) or adenocarcinoma-like (n = 20) chemotherapy, somatostatin analogs (n = 21), targeted therapies (n = 22) and liver-directed therapies (n = 7). Alkylating-based chemotherapy achieved the highest OR rate (37.9%) compared to other treatments (multivariable OR 4.22, 95% CI (1.5–12.2); P = 0.008). Adenocarcinoma-like and alkylating-based chemotherapies showed the highest reductions in 3-month TGR (P < 0.001 and P = 0.008, respectively). The longest median PFS was obtained with adenocarcinoma-like chemotherapy (16.5 months (9.0–24.0)) and targeted therapies (12.0 months (8.2–15.8)), while the shortest PFS was observed with somatostatin analogs (6.2 months (3.8–8.5)) and etoposide-platinum chemotherapy (7.2 months (5.2–9.1)). Etoposide-platinum CT achieved shorter PFS than adenocarcinoma-like (multivariable HR 3.69 (1.61–8.44), P = 0.002) and alkylating-based chemotherapies (multivariable HR 1.95 (1.01–3.78), P = 0.049). Overall, adenocarcinoma-like and alkylating-based chemotherapies may be the most effective treatments for patients with advanced G3 NETs regarding OR and PFS. Etoposide-platinum chemotherapy has poor efficacy in this setting.

High-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) include poorly differentiated carcinomas (NECs) and well-differentiated tumors (NETs). NECs, especially LCNECs, can be difficult to distinguish from non-neuroendocrine carcinoma expressing neuroendocrine markers and from mixed NENs (called MiNENs in the digestive tract and combined carcinomas in the lung, with different criteria of definition). Recent studies on the genetic profiles of LCNECs showed that they are heterogeneous, some of them presenting the signature of site-specific adenocarcinoma. High-grade NETs, observed in digestive and thoracic organs, are only included in the digestive WHO classification, as NET G3. In the lung, they are classified among the atypical carcinoids or the LCNECs. The distinction between high-grade NET and NEC can be difficult on H&E and molecular markers may help. There is still a need for high-quality classification based on clear patho-molecular criteria, that enable the development of new therapeutic options for patients with high-grade NENs.

The gastroenteropancreatic and bronchopulmonary organ systems harbor the majority of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) of the body, comprising 70% and 20% of all NENs, respectively. Their classification distinguishes between well-differentiated and poorly differentiated NENs that are associated with similarly distinctive genetic profiles. This review focuses on a comparison of the histological classification of gastroenteropancreatic NENs and bronchopulmonary NENs, with the aim of highlighting recent progress in the grading of these neoplasms and discussing the most obvious differences. Despite these differences, the principle therapeutic options are still the same for both NEN groups. Thus, further progress in genetics is needed to develop more targeted therapy strategies in future.

Dilatation of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) is rare in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (panNEN) and may be due to different mechanisms. We compared the imaging and pathological characteristics as well as the outcome after resection of positive (S+) and negative (S-) serotonin immunoreactive panNENs causing MPD dilatation. This retrospective study included patients with panNEN, with MPD dilatation (≥ 4 mm) on preoperative CT/MRI and resected between 2005 and 2019. Clinical, radiological, and pathological features were compared between S+ and S- panNENs. Imaging features associated with S+ panNEN were identified using logistic regression analysis. The diagnostic performance of imaging for the differentiation of S+ and S- panNENs was assessed by ROC curve analysis. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was compared between the two groups. The final population of 60 panNENs included 20/60 (33%) S+ panNENs. S+ panNENs were smaller (median 12.5 mm vs. 33 mm; p < 0.01), more frequently hyperattenuating/intense on portal venous phase at CT/MRI (95% vs. 25%, p < 0.01), and presented with more fibrotic stroma on pathology (60.7 ± 16% vs. 40.7 ± 12.8%; p < 0.01) than S- panNENs. Tumor size was the only imaging factor associated with S+ panNEN on multivariate analysis. A tumor size ≤ 20 mm had 95% sensitivity and 90% specificity for the diagnosis of S+ panNEN. Among 52 patients without synchronous liver metastases, recurrence occurred in 1/20 (5%) with S+ panNEN and 18/32 (56%) with S- panNEN (p < 0.01). Median RFS was not reached in S+ panNENs and was 31.3 months in S- panNENs (p < 0.01). In panNENs with MPD dilatation, serotonin positivity is associated with smaller size, extensive fibrotic stroma, and better long-term outcomes. • S+ panNENs showed a higher percentage of fibrotic stroma, higher microvessel density, and lower proliferation index (Ki-67) compared to S- panNENs. • Radiologically, S+ panNENs causing dilatation of the MPD were characterized by a small size (< = 20 mm) and a persistent enhancement on portal phase on both CT and MRI. • Patients with S+ panNENs presented with longer RFS when compared to those with S- panNENs.

Background The ABO blood group may influence the development and progression of cancer. In particular, the prognosis of patients with blood type O is better for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, although this has not been extensively explored in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNET). Objective To assess the influence of the ABO and Rhesus blood types on the risk of recurrence in patients who underwent curative intent PanNET surgical resection. Methods All consecutive patients operated on for well-differentiated panNET in an expert center from 2003 to 2018 were retrospectively included. Blood group, Rhesus system, demographic and clinical data were collected. The primary endpoint was recurrence free survival (RFS). Factors associated with RFS were explored using Cox proportional hazard models. Results Overall, 300 patients (male 43%) were included, median age 54 years old (IQR 45–64). The ABO blood group distribution was similar to that of the French population. There was no association between blood group and tumor features. The median postoperative follow-up was 43.9 months (17.0–77.8). The 5- and 10-year RFS rates were 85 ± 4% and 71 ± 13% in O RhD + patients, versus 72 ± 4% and 63 ± 6% otherwise, respectively (p = 0.035). The O RhD + blood group was associated with a decreased risk of recurrence (HR 0.34, 95% CI [0.15–0.75]), p = 0.007 in multivariable analysis adjusted for age, ki67, functioning syndrome, resection margins, tumor size, lymph node status, oncogenetic syndrome. Conclusions After curative-intent surgical resection for PanNET, patients with a non-O RhD + blood group may have an increased risk of recurrence and could benefit from closer follow-up. Keywords ABO antigen, Carcinoid, Prognosis, Surgery.

Introduction Studies have shown that the PD-1/PD-L1 immunomodulatory pathway slows down anti-tumor immunity in a number of cancers. The description of the expression of these molecules has never been performed in anal low-grade/high grade squamous intra-epithelial lesions (LSIL/HSIL respectively). Materials and methods Patients followed in the AIN3 cohort were routinely sampled. For each selected sample, an immunohistochemical study was performed with anti-CD8, PD-1, PD-L1 antibodies. The presence and distribution of CD8+ lymphocytes, and the presence of PD-1+ lymphocytes and PD-L1+ epithelial cells were assessed. The comparison of these characteristics was performed between the HSIL and LSIL groups. Results 33 patients were included and 78 samples selected (60 HSIL and 18 LSIL). CD8+ lymphocytes were observed more frequently in HSIL versus LSIL in the lamina propria or intra epithelial (respectively 90% vs. 60%, p = 0.01; and 62% vs. 33%, p = 0.04). PD-1+ lymphocytes were observed more frequently in HSIL versus LSIL (41% vs 11%, p = 0.03). There was no difference between HSIL and LSIL for PD-L1+ epithelial cells. Conclusions Anal dysplastic lesions are accompanied by an inflammatory lymphocytic infiltrate expressing CD8 and PD-1, more frequent in high-grade lesions. These results highlight the involvement of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway in the natural history of anal dysplasia.

Introduction This document is a summary of the French Intergroup guidelines regarding the management of digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) published in February 2020 ( www.tncd.org ). Methods All French medical societies involved in the management of NEN took part in this work. Recommendations were graded into four categories (A, B, C or D), according to the level of evidence found in the literature until May 2019. Results The management of NEN is challenging because of their heterogeneity and the increasing complexity of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Pathological analysis is required for their diagnostic and prognostic characterization, which mainly relies on differentiation, grade and stage. The two main emergency situations are functioning syndromes and poorly-differentiated carcinoma. Chromogranin A is the main biochemical marker of NET, although of limited clinical interest. Initial characterization relies on morphological and isotopic imaging. The treatment of localized NET relies on watchful follow-up and local or surgical resection depending on its supposed aggressiveness. Treatment options for metastatic disease include surgery, somatostatin analogues, chemotherapy, targeted therapies, organ-driven locoregional therapies and peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy. As specific predictive factors of treatment efficacy are yet to be identified and head-to-head comparisons have not or only rarely been performed, the therapeutic strategy currently depends on prognostic factors. Cumulative toxicity and the impact of treatment on quality of life must be considered since survival is relatively long in most patients with NET. Conclusion These guidelines are proposed to achieve the most beneficial therapeutic strategy in clinical practice as the therapeutic landscape of NEN is becoming ever more complex. These recommendations are permanently being reviewed.

Introduction: High-grade lung neuroendocrine tumours with carcinoid morphology have been recently reported; they may represent the thoracic counterparts of grade 3 digestive neuroendocrine tumours. We aimed to study their genetic landscape including analysis of tumoral heterogeneity. Methods: Eleven patients with high-grade (>20% Ki-67 and/or >10 mitoses) lung neuroendocrine tumours with a carcinoid morphology were included. We analysed copy number variations, somatic mutations, and protein expression in 16 tumour samples (2 samples were available for 5 patients allowing us to study spatial and temporal heterogeneity). Results: Genomic patterns were heterogeneous ranging from “quiet” to tetraploid, heavily rearranged genomes. Oncogene mutations were rare and most genetic alterations targeted tumour suppressor genes. Chromosomes 11 (7/11), 3 (6/11), 13 (4/11), and 6–17 (3/11) were the most frequently lost. Altered tumour suppressor genes were common to both carcinoids and neuroendocrine carcinomas, involving different pathways including chromatin remodelling (KMT2A, ARID1A, SETD2, SMARCA2, BAP1, PBRM1, KAT6A), DNA repair (MEN1, POLQ, ATR, MLH1, ATM), cell cycle (RB1, TP53, CDKN2A), cell adhesion (LATS2, CTNNB1, GSK3B) and metabolism (VHL). Comparative spatial/temporal analyses confirmed that these tumours emerged from clones of lower aggressivity but revealed that they were genetically heterogeneous accumulating “neuroendocrine carcinoma-like” genetic alterations through progression such as TP53/RB1 alterations. Conclusion: These data confirm the importance of chromatin remodelling genes in pulmonary carcinoids and highlight the potential role of TP53 and RB1 to drive the transformation in more aggressive high-grade tumours.

Acinic cell carcinoma (ACC) is a low grade malignant tumor of the salivary glands. Primary ACC affects most frequently the parotid gland and can rarely arise in the minor salivary glands of the oral cavity, pharynx and larynx. It is extremely rare in the nasal cavity; to our knowledge only 18 cases of primary ACC of the nasal cavity are reported in the English-written literature. Herein we report a case of acinic cell carcinoma of the nasal cavity, describe the clinical, radiological and microscopic features of this uncommon presentation and finally provide a discussion in the light of relevant literature.

Background: The correct histopathological diagnosis of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) is crucial for treatment selection and prognostication. It is also very challenging due to limited experience in nonexpert centers. Revision of pathology is standard of care for most patients who are referred to NEN expert centers. Objectives: To describe the clinical impact of histopathological revision for GEP-NEN patients referred to an expert center. Methods: Retrospective multicenter analysis of all GEP-NENs receiving a histopathological revision in 6 European NEN expert centers (January 2016 to December 2016) to evaluate the impact on patient management. Results: 175 patients were included and 14.7% referred for a second opinion. Histological samples were 69.1% biopsies, 23.4% surgical specimens, and 7.5% endoscopic resections. Histopathological changes due to revision included first assessment of Ki67 in 8.6% of cases, change in grading in 11.4% (3.4% G1 to G2; 5.7% G2 to G1; 0.6% G2 to G3; 1.7% G3 to G2), definition of tumor invasion in 10.8%, additional immunohistochemical staining in 2.3%, diagnosis of mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma in 3.4%, exclusion of NEN in 3.4%, first diagnosis of NEN in 2.3%, and tumor differentiation for G3 in 1.7%. The revision had a clinical impact in 36.0% of patients, leading to a new therapeutic indication in 26.3%. The indication to then perform a new imaging test occurred in 21.1% and recommendation to follow-up with no further treatment in 6.3%. Conclusions: Histopathological revision in expert centers for NENs can change the diagnosis, with a significant clinical impact in about one third of patients.