Search

Background: Multi-parameter tumor gene expression assays (MPAs) are used to estimate individual patient risk and guide chemotherapy use in hormone-sensitive, HER2-negative early breast cancer. The TAILORx trial supports MPA use in a node-negative population. Evidence for MPA use in postmenopausal node-positive breast cancer has been provided by the RxPONDER trial interim analysis but this relies on the absence of superiority in an analysis where >50% of events were unrelated to breast cancer. There is much uncertainty about MPA use for premenopausal patients. OPTIMA (Optimal Personalised Treatment of early breast cancer usIng Multi-parameter Analysis) (ISRCTN42400492) is a prospective international randomized controlled trial designed to validate MPAs as predictors of chemotherapy sensitivity in a largely node-positive breast cancer population. Methods: OPTIMA is a partially blinded study with an adaptive two-stage design. The trial recruits women and men age 40 or older with resected ER-positive, HER2-negative invasive breast cancer and up to 9 involved axillary lymph nodes. Randomization is to standard management (chemotherapy and endocrine therapy) or to MPA-directed treatment using the Prosigna (PAM50) test. Those with a Prosigna tumor Score (ROR_PT) >60 receive standard management whilst those with a low score (≤60) tumor are treated with endocrine therapy alone. Endocrine therapy for pre-menopausal women includes ovarian suppression for all participants unless they experience a chemotherapy-induced menopause. Adjuvant abemaciclib is permitted. The trial will be analyzed for (1) non-inferiority of recurrence according to randomization and (2) cost-effectiveness. The key secondary outcome is non-inferiority of recurrence for patients with low ROR_PT score tumors. The efficacy analyses will be performed Per Protocol using Invasive Breast Cancer Free Survival (IBCFS) as the primary outcome measure to limit the risk of a false non-inferiority conclusion. Recruitment of 4500 patients over 8 years will permit demonstration of up to 3% non-inferiority of test-directed treatment with at least 83% power, assuming 5-year IBCFS is 87% with standard management. An integrated qualitative recruitment study addresses challenges to consent and recruitment, building on experience from the feasibility study which found that a multidisciplinary approach is important for recruitment success. OPTIMA is strongly supported by a patient group which has helped design all patient documents and which is represented on the TMG. Results: The OPTIMA main trial opened in January 2017 and has continued to recruit throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall recruitment as of 1 July 2022 was 2814 (2593 from UK, 221 from Norway). Patient characteristics are well balanced between the trial arms. Currently 95% of randomized participants are eligible for inclusion in the PP analysis. 66% of the MPA-directed arm participants have been allocated to endocrine therapy only. The test failure rate is < 1%. Conclusion: OPTIMA will provide robust unbiased evidence on test-directed chemotherapy safety for both postmenopausal and premenopausal women with 1-3 involved nodes as well as for patients with 4-9 involved nodes and for patients treated with abemaciclib. Funding: OPTIMA is funded by the UK NIHR HTA Programme (10/34/501) and in Norway by KLINBEFORSK and the Norwegian Cancer Society. Views expressed are those of the authors and not those of the HTA Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health. Trial Inquiries: OPTIMA@warwick.ac.uk Patient characteristics Citation Format: Robert Stein, Andreas Makris, Iain Macpherson, Luke Hughes-Davies, Andrea Marshall, Georgina Dotchin, David A. Cameron, Belinda E. Kiely, Caroline Wilson, Anne Armstrong, Helena M. Earl, Christopher J. Poole, Janice Tsang, Bjørn Naume, Daniel Rea, Hege Ohnstad, Peter S. Hall, Stuart A. McIntosh, Bethany Shinkins, Christopher McCabe, Adrienne Morgan, John MS Bartlett, Janet A. Dunn. OPTIMA, a prospective randomized trial to validate the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of gene expression test-directed chemotherapy decisions in high clinical risk early breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-32-01.

Adjuvant therapy; Breast cancer; Olaparib Terapia adyuvante; Cáncer de mama; Olaparib Teràpia adjuvant; Càncer de mama; Olaparib Background The randomized, double-blind OlympiA trial compared 1 year of the oral poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, olaparib, to matching placebo as adjuvant therapy for patients with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 (gBRCA1/2pv) and high-risk, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, early breast cancer (EBC). The first pre-specified interim analysis (IA) previously demonstrated statistically significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant disease-free survival (DDFS). The olaparib group had fewer deaths than the placebo group, but the difference did not reach statistical significance for overall survival (OS). We now report the pre-specified second IA of OS with updates of IDFS, DDFS, and safety. Patients and methods One thousand eight hundred and thirty-six patients were randomly assigned to olaparib or placebo following (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation therapy if indicated. Endocrine therapy was given concurrently with study medication for hormone receptor-positive cancers. Statistical significance for OS at this IA required P < 0.015. Results With a median follow-up of 3.5 years, the second IA of OS demonstrated significant improvement in the olaparib group relative to the placebo group [hazard ratio 0.68; 98.5% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-0.97; P = 0.009]. Four-year OS was 89.8% in the olaparib group and 86.4% in the placebo group (Δ 3.4%, 95% CI −0.1% to 6.8%). Four-year IDFS for the olaparib group versus placebo group was 82.7% versus 75.4% (Δ 7.3%, 95% CI 3.0% to 11.5%) and 4-year DDFS was 86.5% versus 79.1% (Δ 7.4%, 95% CI 3.6% to 11.3%), respectively. Subset analyses for OS, IDFS, and DDFS demonstrated benefit across major subgroups. No new safety signals were identified including no new cases of acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. Conclusion With 3.5 years of median follow-up, OlympiA demonstrates statistically significant improvement in OS with adjuvant olaparib compared with placebo for gBRCA1/2pv-associated EBC and maintained improvements in the previously reported, statistically significant endpoints of IDFS and DDFS with no new safety signals. Funding for this work, which was conducted as a collaborative partnership among the Breast International Group, NRG Oncology, Frontier Science, AstraZeneca, and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, U.S.A. (MSD), was provided by the National Institutes of Health (grant numbers: U10CA 180868, UG1CA 189867, and U10CA 180822) and by AstraZeneca as part of an alliance between AstraZeneca and MSD. Provision of olaparib and placebo was from AstraZeneca.

Purpose: Despite promising activity in hematopoietic malignancies, efficacy of the B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) inhibitor venetoclax in solid tumors is unknown. We report the prespecified VERONICA primary results, a randomized phase II clinical trial evaluating venetoclax and fulvestrant in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, post–cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor progression. Patients and Methods: Pre-/postmenopausal females ≥18 years were randomized 1:1 to venetoclax (800 mg orally daily) plus fulvestrant (500 mg intramuscular; cycle 1: days 1 and 15; subsequent 28-day cycles: day 1) or fulvestrant alone. The primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate (CBR); secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety. Exploratory biomarker analyses included BCL2 and BCL extra-large (BCLXL) tumor expression, and PIK3CA circulating tumor DNA mutational status. Results: At primary analysis (cutoff: August 5, 2020; n = 103), venetoclax did not significantly improve CBR [venetoclax plus fulvestrant: 11.8% (n = 6/51; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.44–23.87); fulvestrant: 13.7% (7/51; 5.70–26.26); risk difference –1.96% (95% CI, –16.86 to 12.94)]. Median PFS was 2.69 months (95% CI, 1.94–3.71) with venetoclax plus fulvestrant versus 1.94 months (1.84–3.55) with fulvestrant (stratified HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.61–1.45; P = 0.7853). Overall survival data were not mature. A nonsignificant improvement of CBR and PFS was observed in patients whose tumors had strong BCL2 expression (IHC 3+), a BCL2/BCLXL Histoscore ratio ≥1, or PIK3CA-wild-type status. Conclusions: Our findings do not indicate clinical utility for venetoclax plus fulvestrant in endocrine therapy–resistant, CDK4/6 inhibitor–refractory metastatic breast tumors, but suggest possible increased dependence on BCLXL in this setting.

Supplementary Data from Combined Perioperative Lapatinib and Trastuzumab in Early HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Identifies Early Responders: Randomized UK EPHOS-B Trial Long-Term Results

Supplementary Data from VERONICA: Randomized Phase II Study of Fulvestrant and Venetoclax in ER-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Post-CDK4/6 Inhibitors – Efficacy, Safety, and Biomarker Results

Supplementary Figures: Supplementary Figure 1. Summary of duration on AZD9496 therapy, previous therapies, and circulating biomarkers status at baseline for each patient ranked by ascending dose; Supplementary Figure 2. Tumor pharmacodynamics. Supplementary Tables: Supplementary Table 1. Study Plan showing time-points of collection of biosamples for exploratory research; Supplementary Table 2. ddPCR primers and probes;Supplementary Table 3. Antibodies and conditions for IHC analysis Antibodies for IHC analysis; Supplementary Table 4. Patients with {greater than or equal to}1 CTC/7.5 mL WB within 120 days of fulvestrant wash-out period prior C1D1.

Supplementary Figure from Combined Perioperative Lapatinib and Trastuzumab in Early HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Identifies Early Responders: Randomized UK EPHOS-B Trial Long-Term Results

Purpose:Common resistance mechanisms to endocrine therapy (ET) in estrogen receptor (ER)–positive metastatic breast cancers include, among others, ER loss and acquired activating mutations in the ligand-binding domain of the ER gene (ESR1LBDm). ESR1 mutational mediated resistance may be overcome by selective ER degraders (SERD). During the first-in-human study of oral SERD AZD9496, early changes in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) were explored as potential noninvasive tools, alongside paired tumor biopsies, to assess pharmacodynamics and early efficacy.Experimental Design:CTC were enumerated/phenotyped for ER and Ki67 using CellSearch in serial blood draws. ctDNA was assessed for the most common ESR1LBDm by droplet digital PCR (BioRad).Results:Before starting AZD9496, 11 of 43 (25%) patients had ≥5 CTC/7.5 mL whole blood (WB), none of whom underwent reduction to +, two of whom had CTC-ER+ reduction. CTC-Ki67 status did not change appreciably. Patients with ≥5 CTC/7.5 mL WB before treatment had worse progression-free survival (PFS) than patients with P = 0.0003). Fourteen of 45 (31%) patients had ESR1LBDm+ ctDNA at baseline, five of whom had ≥2 unique mutations. Baseline ESR1LBDm status was not prognostic. Patients with persistently elevated CTC and/or ESR1LBDm+ ctDNA at C1D15 had worse PFS than patients who did not (P = 0.0007).Conclusions:Elevated CTC at baseline was a strong prognostic factor in this cohort. Early on-treatment changes were observed in CTC-ER+ and ESR1LBDm+ ctDNA, but not in overall CTC number. Integrating multiple biomarkers in prospective trials may improve outcome prediction and ET resistance mechanisms' identification over a single biomarker.

Purpose:EPHOS-B aimed to determine whether perioperative anti-HER2 therapy inhibited proliferation and/or increased apoptosis in HER2-positive breast cancer.Patients and Methods:This randomized phase II, two-part, multicenter trial included newly diagnosed women with HER2-positive invasive breast cancer due to undergo surgery. Patients were randomized to: part 1 (1:2:2), no treatment (control), trastuzumab or lapatinib; part 2 (1:1:2) control, trastuzumab, or lapatinib and trastuzumab combination. Treatment was given for 11 days presurgery. Coprimary endpoints were change in Ki67 and apoptosis between baseline and surgery tumor samples (biologic response: ≥30% change). Central pathology review scored residual cancer burden (RCB). Relapse-free survival (RFS) explored long-term effects.Results:Between November 2010 and September 2015, 257 patients were randomized (part 1: control 22, trastuzumab 57, lapatinib 51; part 2: control 29, trastuzumab 32, combination 66). Ki67 response was evaluable for 223 patients: in part 1 Ki67 response occurred in 29/44 (66%) lapatinib versus 18/49 (37%) trastuzumab (P = 0.007) and 1/22 (5%) control (P < 0.0001); in part 2 in 36/49 (74%) combination versus 14/31 (45%) trastuzumab (P = 0.02) and 2/28 (7%) control (P < 0.0001). No significant increase in apoptosis after 11 days was seen in treatment groups. Six patients achieved complete pathologic response (pCR, RCB0) and 13 RCB1, all but two in the combination group. After 6 years median follow-up, 28 (11%) had recurrence and 19 (7%) died. No recurrences or deaths were observed among patients who achieved a pCR. Ki67% falls ≥50% associated with fewer recurrences (P = 0.002).Conclusions:Early response after short duration anti-HER2 dual therapy identifies cancers dependent on the HER2 pathway providing a strategy for exploring risk-adapted individualized treatment de-escalation.

Purpose:Despite promising activity in hematopoietic malignancies, efficacy of the B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) inhibitor venetoclax in solid tumors is unknown. We report the prespecified VERONICA primary results, a randomized phase II clinical trial evaluating venetoclax and fulvestrant in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, post–cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor progression.Patients and Methods:Pre-/postmenopausal females ≥18 years were randomized 1:1 to venetoclax (800 mg orally daily) plus fulvestrant (500 mg intramuscular; cycle 1: days 1 and 15; subsequent 28-day cycles: day 1) or fulvestrant alone. The primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate (CBR); secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety. Exploratory biomarker analyses included BCL2 and BCL extra-large (BCLXL) tumor expression, and PIK3CA circulating tumor DNA mutational status.Results:At primary analysis (cutoff: August 5, 2020; n = 103), venetoclax did not significantly improve CBR [venetoclax plus fulvestrant: 11.8% (n = 6/51; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.44–23.87); fulvestrant: 13.7% (7/51; 5.70–26.26); risk difference –1.96% (95% CI, –16.86 to 12.94)]. Median PFS was 2.69 months (95% CI, 1.94–3.71) with venetoclax plus fulvestrant versus 1.94 months (1.84–3.55) with fulvestrant (stratified HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.61–1.45; P = 0.7853). Overall survival data were not mature. A nonsignificant improvement of CBR and PFS was observed in patients whose tumors had strong BCL2 expression (IHC 3+), a BCL2/BCLXL Histoscore ratio ≥1, or PIK3CA-wild-type status.Conclusions:Our findings do not indicate clinical utility for venetoclax plus fulvestrant in endocrine therapy–resistant, CDK4/6 inhibitor–refractory metastatic breast tumors, but suggest possible increased dependence on BCLXL in this setting.

Supplementary Table from VERONICA: Randomized Phase II Study of Fulvestrant and Venetoclax in ER-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Post-CDK4/6 Inhibitors – Efficacy, Safety, and Biomarker Results

Background: SERENA-1 (NCT03616587) is a Phase 1, multi-part, open-label study of camizestrant in women with ER+/HER2− advanced breast cancer. Parts A/B and C/D (escalation/expansion) examined camizestrant as monotherapy and in combination with palbociclib respectively and have been presented previously.1,2 Here we present data from parts G/H which examined camizestrant in combination with abemaciclib. Methods: The primary objective was to determine the safety and tolerability of camizestrant 75 mg once daily (QD) in combination with abemaciclib 150 mg twice daily (BID). Secondary objectives included investigation of anti-tumor response and pharmacokinetics (PK). Participants were previously treated women of any menopausal status (pre-menopausal women received this combination alongside ongoing ovarian function suppressors). Prior treatment with ≤2 lines of chemotherapy in the advanced setting was permitted. There was no limit on the number of lines of prior endocrine treatment in the advanced setting; previous treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and fulvestrant was permitted. Results: As of 1st June 2022, 24 patients had received camizestrant in combination with abemaciclib with a median 7.7 month follow up. Tolerability of the combination of camizestrant and abemaciclib was consistent with that of each drug individually. No patient required camizestrant dose reduction. All camizestrant-related heart rate decreases were Grade 1 (asymptomatic). PK data for camizestrant in combination with abemaciclib were consistent with camizestrant as monotherapy and published abemaciclib steady-state PK data, indicating no clinically relevant drug-drug interaction. In these heavily pre-treated patients (46% prior chemotherapy, 75% prior CDK4/6i, 54% prior fulvestrant; all in the advanced disease setting) and of whom 67% had visceral metastases, the objective response rate was 5/19 (26.3%), the clinical benefit rate at 24 weeks was 16/24 (66.7%) and the median progression-free survival had not been reached, with 8/24 patients experiencing a progression event. These data support the use of camizestrant 75 mg QD combined with the approved abemaciclib dose. Conclusions: Camizestrant 75 mg QD in combination with abemaciclib 150 mg BID was well tolerated with encouraging clinical activity. The inclusion of this regimen in the ongoing Phase 3, SERENA-6 trial 3, of camizestrant combined with CDK4/6i versus an aromatase inhibitor, will further clarify the role of this combination in the treatment of patients with ER+/HER2− advanced breast cancer with tumors expressing ESR1 mutations. References 1. Baird R, Oliveira M, Ciruelos Gil EM, et al. SABCS 2020 Virtual Meeting. Abstract PS11-05. 2. Oliveira M, Hamilton EP, Incorvati J, et al. J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr 1032). 3. SERENA-6 trial. Available at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04964934 We acknowledge Helen Heffron, PhD, from InterComm International who provided medical writing support funded by AstraZeneca. Citation Format: Nicholas Turner, Christos Vaklavas, Emiliano Calvo, Javier Garcia-Corbacho, Jason Incorvati, Manuel Ruiz Borrego, Chris Twelves, Anne Armstrong, Begoña Bermejo, Erika Hamilton, Mafalda Oliveira, Eva Ciruelos, Peter Kabos, Manish R Patel, Maria Borrell, Howard Burris, Bruno de Paula, Alejandro Falcon, Cristina Hernando, Irene Moreno, Ciara S. O’Brien, Elena Shagisultanova, Ivan Victoria Ruiz, Judy S. Wang, Mei Wei, Tim Brier, Danielle Carroll, Carmela Ciardullo, Lisa Gibbons, itziar irurzun-Arana, Tony Jack, bistra kirova, Teresa Klinowska, Justin Lindemann, Julie Maidment, Alastair Mathewson, Rhiannon Maudsley, Robert McEwen, Christopher Morrow, Andy Sykes, Richard D. Baird. SERENA-1: Updated analyses from a Phase 1 study of the next generation oral selective estrogen receptor degrader camizestrant (AZD9833) combined with abemaciclib, in women with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-07-28.

Purpose: H3B-6545, a novel Selective ERα Covalent Antagonist (SERCA), inactivates both and wild-type and mutant ERα by targeting cysteine 530 and enforcing antagonist conformation. H3B-6545 demonstrated preclinical high activity in breast cancer models with constitutively active ESR1 mutations (Furman C, SABCS 2020) and clinical activity in pretreated women with ER+ breast cancer (Hamilton EP, ASCO 2021). Patients and Methods: The primary objective of the phase II is to estimate the objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary objectives include safety. Results: 94 pts were treated with 450 mg daily, the recommended phase II dose: 11 in the phase I and 83 in the phase II parts of the trial. Patients and tumor characteristics were presented previously (Hamilton EP, ASCO, 2021). As of March 31, 2021, grade (gr) 2 or higher adverse events (AE) reported in ≥10% were anemia (19%), nausea (17%), fatigue (16%), and diarrhea (12%). Laboratory gr 2 or higher abnormalities reported in ≥10% pts were creatinine clearance decrease (39%), hemoglobin decrease (38%), Lymphocytes decrease (37%), ALT increase (14%), AST increase (13%), bilirubin increase (12%), and creatinine increase (12%). AE of gr 1 sinus bradycardia (asymptomatic) was reported in 35% and gr 2 (symptomatic, no intervention needed) was reported in 5%. Gr 2 and 3 QTcF prolongation were reported in 2 and 3 pts, respectively. There were no treatment-related deaths. Efficacy estimates are presented in Table 1. CI: Confidence interval. N: total number of pts in full analysis set, used in PFS analysis. n: number of response-evaluable pts, used in ORR and CBR analysis. Efficacy estimates were consistent across the various subgroups. Responses were demonstrated in heavily pretreated pts, pts with visceral metastases, pts with constitutionally active ESR1 Y537S mutations, and in pts who received chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. Numerically higher response rate and longer PFS were observed in pts with ESR1 Y537s. Conclusions: H3B-6545 has a manageable safety profile and demonstrated single-agent anti-tumor activity in heavily pretreated ER+, HER2- mBC patients. Clinical activity was consistent across the various subgroups. Tumors harboring the constitutionally active ESR1 Y537S mutation may present higher ERα activity, and consequently enrich for luminal A traits and demonstrate greater lineage dependence on ERα. Table 1.Consistency of H3B-6545 activity across the key subgroupsEfficacyClinical CharacteristicORR % (95% CI)CBR % (95% CI)Median PFS mo (95% CI)Overall population (N=94, n=72)16.7 (8.9, 27.3)40.3 (28.9, 52.5)5.1 (3.2, 6.2)Liver and/or lung metastases (N=76, n=62)17.7 (9.2, 29.5)41.9 (29.5, 55.2)5.4 (1.8, 7.2)≥3 prior regimens (N=49, n=39)20.5 (9.3, 36.5)48.7 (32.4, 65.2)5.4 (3.5, 7.3)Prior chemotherapy (N=47, n=35)17.1 (6.6, 33.6)51.4 (34.0, 68.6)5.5 (3.6, 7.3)PgR+ (N=38, n=32)15.6 (5.3, 32.8)50.0 (31.9, 68.1)5.4 (2.0, 8.8)ESR1 clonal Y537S (N=10, n=10)30.0 (6.7, 65.2)60.0 (26.2, 87.8)7.3 (0.8, 11.2)ESR1 clonal D538G (N=19, n=17)0.0 (0.0, 19.5)35.3 (14.2, 61.7)5.4 (1.7, 7.2) Citation Format: Erika P Hamilton, Judy S Wang, Timothy Pluard, Aki Morikawa, E Claire Dees, Robert H Jones, Barbara Haley, Anne Armstrong, Adam L Cohen, Pamela Munster, Gail S Wright, Fadi Kayali, Lisa Cantagallo, Manav Korpal, Jenny Long, Jianjun Xiao, Benoit Destenaves, Lei Gao, Tarek Sahmoud, Antonio Gualberto, Dejan Juric. H3B-6545, a novel selective estrogen receptor covalent antagonist (SERCA), in estrogen receptor positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer - A phase II study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-17-10.

Involved margins after surgery for early breast cancer increase the risk of local recurrence (LR), but international guidelines suggest that’ no tumour’ on ink is sufficient margin clearance after breast conserving surgery (BCS). Data on the effect of margin clearance on distant recurrence (DR) are lacking. Our aim was to determine the association between margin involvement, recurrence (DR) and breast cancer deaths. Methods Data from breast cancer units in Greater Manchester (GM) and the UK National Cancer Registry (NCRAS) were analysed. Margin status was prospectively recorded after surgery according to National Health Service Breast Screening Pathology (NHSBSP) minimum pathology data standards All patients underwent curative surgery and received adjuvant therapy according to local guidelines. Patients not undergoing curative surgery(T4, inflammatory or metastatic cancer) were excluded .Cox-proportional hazards models investigated factors associated with LR, DR and risk of breast cancer death.NCRAS records breast cancer deaths . Results GM analysis included 3270 patients from 2010 to 2014, 2295 (70.2%) had margins (>2mm) ,302 (9.2%) close (1-2mm) margin clearance and 673 (20.6%) involved (2mm. For Breast Conservation margins1mm (67.5%) and 3,935 (9.6%) were classed as “clear margins” and 9,325 (22.8%) cancer patients had involved margins 1mm were associated with reduced DR and should be essential surgical management. Current guidelines about surgical margins need to be re-evaluated to achieve reduced DR and cancer deaths. Citation Format: Nigel James Bundred, Sarah Michael, John Broggio, Anne Armstrong, Glen Martin, Mohamed Absar, Jane Ooi. Increased distant recurrence following margin involvement in early invasive breast cancer in two large UK cohorts [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-20-01.

Background: Triple Negative Breast Cancers (TNBC) are a biologically diverse and aggressive subgroup lacking targeted therapy. Germline BRCA (gBRCA) breast cancer and TNBC share some phenotypic and molecular similarities, with 10%-20% of TNBC patients having gBRCA mutations. Homologous recombination deficient tumours are particularly sensitive to PARP inhibitors such as olaparib (Lynparza). It has been shown that adjuvant olaparib for patients with high-risk, HER2-negative early breast cancer and gBRCA pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants after adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly improves 3-year invasive and distant disease-free survival compared to placebo (OlympiA). Aim: To establish if the addition of olaparib to neoadjuvant platinum based chemotherapy for basal TNBC and/or gBRCA breast cancer is safe and improves efficacy (pathological complete response (pCR) rate). Trial design: 3-stage open label randomised phase II/III trial of neoadjuvant paclitaxel and carboplatin +/- olaparib, followed by clinicians' choice of anthracycline regimen. Stage 1 and 2: Randomisation (1:1:1) to either control (3 weekly carboplatin AUC5/weekly paclitaxel 80mg/m2 for 4 cycles) or one of two research arms with the same chemotherapy regimen but with two different schedules of olaparib 150mg BD for 12 days. Stage 3: Randomisation (1:1) to either control arm or to the research arm selected in stage 2. End-points: Stage 1: Safety; Stage 2: Schedule selection using pCR rate and completion rate of olaparib using a “pick-the-winner” design. Stage 3: pCR rate. This trial includes an optional pathway (PARTNERING) aiming to establish if the addition of new agents (ATR inhibitor and PDL1 inhibitor) can improve response in those patients with evidence of residual disease before surgery. Eligibility criteria: Aged 16-70; histologically confirmed invasive breast cancer; ER-negative, HER2-negative with TNBC basal phenotype or gBRCA positive, HER2-negative irrespective of hormone status; clinical stage T1-4 N0-2; performance status 0-1; treatment commenced within 6 weeks of diagnostic biopsy; biomarker scores: TILs, CK 5/6, EGFR +/- AR. Statistical methods: The recruitment of TNBC non-gBRCA and gBRCA patients is independent. Enrichment design is applied with an overall significance level 0.05(α) and 80% power. A minimum of 780 patients will be included to detect an absolute improvement of 15% (all patients and the TNBC non-gBRCA cohort) and 20% (gBRCA patients) by adding olaparib to platinum based chemotherapy. It is planned to recruit a minimum of 188 gBRCA patients. A maximum of 15 patients will be allocated into each PARTNERING cohort. Present accrual: Recruitment commenced 27 May 2016 and 678 patients from 30 sites have been accrued to date. The IDSMC reviewed the trial after Stages 1 and 2 and recommended to continue the trial without change. Data analysis for Stage 2 revealed no safety concerns and research arm 2 (olaparib on day 3 to day 14) was selected. Stage 3 Phase I recruitment is in progress (recruiting TNBC non-gBRCA and gBRCA patients) and we anticipate moving to Phase II (recruiting gBRCA patients only) by early 2022. Four patients have been accrued to the PARTNERING optional pathway to date. The trial is open and enrolling patients to UK and international sites. Contact information: partner@addenbrookes.nhs.uk Citation Format: Lynsey M Drewett, Karen A Pinilla, Louise Grybowicz, Jerome Wulff, Alimu Dayimu, Nikolaos Demiris, Jessica Martin, Camila Maida de Pontes, Nicola Johnson, Caron Harvey, Erdem Demir, Kimberley St John Green, James Jones, Gemma Young, Anne-Laure Vallier, Wendi Qian, Andrea Machin, Karen McAdam, Rebecca Roylance, Ellen R Copson, Anne Armstrong, Nicola Levitt, Elena Provenzano, Marc Tischkowitz, Emma McMurtry, Helena Earl, Jean E Abraham. PARTNER: Randomised, phase II/III trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the addition of olaparib to platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple negative and/or germline BRCA mutated breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-24-01.

Background: EPHOS-B is a multi-centre randomized trial designed to investigate whether anti-HER2 therapy given 11 days pre-surgery inhibited proliferation and/or increased apoptosis in HER2-positive early breast cancer. Significant differences in Ki67 response (≥30% change between baseline and surgery) were observed between treatment groups and control, although no significant increases in apoptosis were seen [1]. We report here 5-year outcomes and their association with peri-operative response, including post-hoc exploratory analyses on stromal tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Methods: Patients were randomized (1:2:2) to no treatment (control), trastuzumab or lapatinib (Part-1), and (1:1:2) to control, trastuzumab, or lapatinib and trastuzumab combination (Part-2). Relapse free survival (RFS) is defined as the time from randomisation to local, regional, or distant tumour recurrence or death from any cause, with second primary cancers censored. Five-year RFS rates were estimated by Kaplan-Meier across treatment and peri-operative response groups, and compared by Log-Rank tests. Central scoring of stromal tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) on scanned H&E baseline and surgery slides was conducted post-hoc according to the International TILs Working Group. Baseline TILs (bTILS) were explored across treatment groups, and associated with trial outcomes. Changes in TILS in patients without pathological regression were correlated with Ki67 changes and RFS. Results: Overall, 257 patients were randomized (Part-1: control 22, trastuzumab 57, lapatinib 51; Part-2: control 29, trastuzumab 32, trastuzumab+lapatinib 66). Central pathology review identified six patients achieving complete pathological response (pCR), and 13 RCB1 (as per the Residual Cancer Burden score), all but two in the combination group. After 6 years median follow-up, 28 women (11%) had recurrence, and 19 (7%) died; no differences between groups were found (Table). No recurrences were observed amongst pCR patients; only 1 local recurrence observed amongst RCB1. Patients with Ki67 falls ≥50% had better RFS than those with modest falls or no falls (Table). In patients with no evidence of disease regression at surgery, those with higher TILs (≥20%) at surgery had better RFS than those with lower TILs. Conclusions: Early response (pCR/RCB1 or Ki67 reductions >50%) after 11 days pre-operative anti-HER2 dual therapy identifies cancers dependent on the HER2 pathway and provides a strategy for individualising treatment, including de-escalation of therapy. [1] Bundred N, Cameron D, Amstrong A et al (2016) Effects of perioperative lapatinib and trastuzumab, alone and in combination, in early HER2+ breast cancer − the UK EPHOS-B trial (CRUK/08/002) European Journal of Cancer;57:S1-S8. Table - Relapse-free survival by treatment and by peri-operative responseN randomisedNRFS event5-year RFS95%CILog-rank p-valueRandomised treatmentTrastuzumab (P1)577 (12.3%)88%76-94%T vs L p=0.75Lapatinib (P1)515 (9.8%)90%77-96%L vs C p=0.41Control (P1)221 (4.6%)95%92-99%Trastuzumab (P2)327 (21.9%)87%69-95%T vs T+L p=0.048Combination (P2)665 (7.6%)92%83-97%T+L vs C p=0.64Control (P2)293 (10.3%)90%71-97%%Ki67 change:>50% decrease722 (2.8%)99%90-100%0.002>10% decrease7717 (22.1%)80%69-88%20%502 (4%)96%85-99Surgery TILS (only RCB2/3)20%653 (4.6%)95%86-98Change in TILS (only RCB2/3)No significant increase15221 (13.8%)88%81-920.16Increase >20%352 (5.7%)94%79-99 Citation Format: Nigel Bundred, Nuria Porta, Adrian Murray Brunt, Angela Cramer, Andrew Hanby, Abeer Shaaban, Emad Rakha, Anne Armstrong, Ramsey Cutress, David Dodwell, Marie Emson, Abigail Evans, Sue Hartup, Kieran Horgan, Stuart McIntosh, Jay Naik, Samkaran Narayanan, Jane Oii, Anthony Skene, David Cameron, Judith Bliss. Combined peri-operative lapatinib and trastuzumab in early HER2-positive breast cancer - Long term results of the randomized UK EPHOS-B trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-13-08.

Background: Chemotherapy, together with immune checkpoint inhibitors, improves outcomes vs chemotherapy alone for patients (pts) with metastatic (m)TNBC PD-L1+ disease. Most of these pts progress within a year. In a previous study, D (anti-PD-L1) combined with chemotherapy enhanced antitumor immune responses in early TNBC (Loibl. Ann Oncol 2019). In TNBC, activation of the PI3K/AKT/PTEN pathway and high CD73 expression are common. BEGONIA is an ongoing 2-part, multicenter, multi-arm, open-label platform study, evaluating safety and efficacy of D or D+P combined with novel therapies as first-line treatment for mTNBC (NCT03742102). Preliminary results from 2 arms were presented at ASCO 2021 (Abstract #1023). Here, we report results from Arm 1 D+P, Arm 2 D+P+C, and Arm 5 D+P+O. C is an oral, selective, ATP-competitive catalytic inhibitor of all 3 AKT isoforms, and O is a mAb targeting CD73. Methods: Eligible pts had untreated, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic TNBC. In Arms 1 and 5, pts received D 1500 mg IV Q4W + P 90 mg/m2 IV day (d)1, d8, d15 of every cycle. Pts in Arm 5 also received O 3000 mg IV on d1 and d15 for the first 2 cycles, then Q4W. In Arm 2, pts received D 1500 mg IV Q4W + P 80/90 mg/m2 IV in 4-week cycles (d1, d8, d15, 1 week off) + C 400 mg BID in 4-week cycles (d2-5 × 3 weeks, 1 week off). Primary objectives were safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response. Tumors were assessed Q8W per RECIST v1.1. The first 6 pts treated in Arms 2 and 5 were evaluated for dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), with additional pts enrolled if treatment was tolerated. PD-L1 expression was assessed retrospectively. Previously presented data from Arm 1 D+P, are included for reference (Schmid. ASCO 2021, #1023). Results: In Arm 2 (data cutoff Mar 2021), 30 pts received D+P+C (15 P[80], 15 P[90]; total 13 ongoing); 2 pts (6.7%) discontinued all treatment due to AEs. The rates of dose delays were 13 pts (43%) for D and 15 (50%) for P; dose interruptions were 1 (3%) for D, 12 (40%) for P, 15 (50%) for C; dose reductions were 12 (40%) for P and 14 (47%) for C. Treatment-related (tr)SAEs and G3/4 trAEs were experienced by 7 (23%) and 22 (73%) pts. In Arm 5 (data cutoff Sep 2020), 33 pts received D+P+O (14 ongoing); no pts discontinued due to AEs. The rates of dose delays were 13 pts (39%) for D, 10 (30%) for P, 10 (30%) for O; dose interruptions were 2 (6%) for D, 10 (30%) for P, 3 (9%) for O; and dose reductions were 12 (36%) for P. trSAEs and G3/4 trAEs were experienced by 1 (3%) and 5 (15%) pts. In both arms, there were no DLTs or deaths due to AEs. The Table presents follow-up time and efficacy outcomes for Arms 1, 2, and 5. Responses were observed regardless of PD-L1 expression. The potential value of mutations in the PI3K pathway and CD73 expression as predictive biomarkers will be discussed for Arms 2 and 5, respectively. Updated data for Arm 1 will be presented. Conclusions: The safety profiles of triplet combinations in Arms 2 and 5 were consistent with the individual agents; however, in Arm 2, there was a relatively high rate of G3/4 trAEs but a low discontinuation rate for AEs. Although BEGONIA was not designed to compare activity across arms and numbers were small, the ORR of each triplet therapy was numerically similar to D+P. Biomarker analysis may elucidate pts that benefit from the combination of C or O with D+P. Funding: AstraZeneca Table. Efficacy outcomes in Arms 1, 2, and 5 of BEGONIAArm 1Arm 2Arm 5D+P N=23D+P(80)+C n=15D+P(90)+C n=15All D+P+C N=30D+P+O N=33Duration of follow-up at data cutoff, months, median (range)16.6 (8.5-19.8)6.7 (2-9)16.8 (6-21)8.2 (2-21)8.6 (4.1-14.6)Confirmed ORR, n (%)13 (56.5)8 (53.3)8 (53.3)16 (53.3)15 (45.5)95% CI34.5-76.826.6-78.726.6-78.7NC28.1-63.3CR, n10111PR12871514SD (Unconfirmed PR)7 (3)6 (2)4 (2)10 (4)13 (4)PD31345Percentage with ongoing response at data cutoff53.8%75.0%25.0%50.0%66.7%Arm 1 data cutoff was Sep 2020. C, capivasertib; CI, confidence interval; CR, complete response; D, durvalumab; NC, not calculable; O, oleclumab; ORR, objective response rate; P, paclitaxel; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease. Citation Format: Peter Schmid, Zbigniew Nowecki, Seock-Ah Im, Wei-Pang Chung, Simon Lord, Anne Armstrong, Cynthia X Ma, Robert Huisden, Ross Stewart, Rakesh Kumar, Gaia Schiavon, Hannah Dry, Ana Nunes, Kyung Hae Jung, Yeon Hee Park. BEGONIA: Phase 1b/2 study of durvalumab (D) combinations in locally advanced/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): Results from Arm 1 D + paclitaxel (P), Arm 2 D+P + capivasertib (C), and Arm 5 D+P + oleclumab (O) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD10-03.

Objective To estimate the incidence of ectopic pregnancy (EP) associated with prescription contraceptive use. Study Design We performed a retrospective cohort study of women aged 15 to 44 years at Kaiser Permanente Northern and Southern California during 2010 to 2019. We identified EPs and prescription contraceptive use from diagnosis, procedural, and medication codes, and natural language processing of clinical notes from electronic health records. Contraceptive use categories included combined hormonal contraceptives, intrauterine devices, depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA), progestin-only pills (POPs), implants, no method after recent discontinuation of a prescription contraceptive in the last 12 months, and no method after discontinuation of a prescription contraceptive more than 12 months ago or no use of prescription contraceptives during the study period. Contraceptive use was updated as women started, stopped, or changed methods. An EP was attributed to a contraceptive method if it occurred 14 days after starting and up to 42 days after stopping a method. Age-adjusted EP incidence and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated per 10,000 woman-years overall and by contraceptive category. Results There were 11,436 EPs among 3,204,118 women with 11,909,842 woman-years of follow-up for an overall EP incidence of 9.5 per 10,000 woman-years (95%CI 9.3−9.6). The majority of EPs (9662; 84.5%) occurred during no prescription contraceptive use. EP incidence was lowest during DMPA (1.8 per 10,000 woman-years [95%CI 1.2−2.5]) or implant (2.0 per 10,000 woman-years [95%CI 1.2−3.3]) use, and higher during POP use at 15.2 (95%CI 12.2−19.6); however, incidence was highest after recent discontinuation of a prescription contraceptive (20.6 per 10,000 woman-years [95%CI 19.7-21.4]). Conclusions EP incidence is lower with prescription contraceptive use than with nonuse. Implications All prescription contraceptives, including POPs are protective of EP.

To explore to what extent intrauterine device (IUD) expulsion is associated with demographic and clinical risk factors.The APEX-IUD (Association of Perforation and Expulsion of IntraUterine Devices) study was a U.S. cohort study using electronic health records from three integrated health care systems (Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Southern California, and Washington) and a health care information exchange (Regenstrief Institute). These analyses included individuals aged 50 years or younger with IUD insertions from 2001 to 2018. Intrauterine device expulsion cumulative incidence and incidence rates were estimated. Using Cox regression models, hazard ratios with 95% CIs were estimated before and after adjustment for risk factors of interest (age, race and ethnicity, parity, body mass index [BMI], heavy menstrual bleeding, and dysmenorrhea) and potential confounders.In total, 228,834 individuals with IUD insertion and no delivery in the previous 52 weeks were identified (184,733 [80.7%] with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system). Diagnosis of heavy menstrual bleeding-particularly a diagnosis in both recent and past periods-was the strongest risk factor for IUD expulsion. Categories with the highest risk of IUD expulsion within each risk factor included individuals diagnosed with overweight, obesity, and morbid obesity; those in younger age groups, especially among those aged 24 years or younger; and in those with parity of four or more. Non-Hispanic White individuals had the lowest incidence and risk, and after adjustment, Asian or Pacific Islander individuals had the highest risk. Dysmenorrhea was not independently associated with expulsion risk when adjusting for heavy menstrual bleeding.Most risk factors for expulsion identified in this study appear consistent with known physiologic factors that affect uterine anatomy and physiology (age, BMI, heavy menstrual bleeding, parity). The increased risk of IUD expulsion among individuals of color warrants further investigation. Intrauterine devices are an effective long-term contraceptive; expulsion is uncommon, but patients should be counseled accordingly.Bayer AG.EU PAS register, EUPAS33461.

INTRODUCTION: Ectopic pregnancy leads to reproductive health morbidity, including greater risk of another ectopic pregnancy, infertility, and, in rare cases, mortality. Information on trends in the incidence of ectopic pregnancy in the last decade is limited. METHODS: A population-based cross-sectional study of women aged 15−44 years enrolled at Kaiser Permanente Northern and Southern California 2010−2019 was conducted. Electronic health records were used to identify ectopic pregnancies. The crude ectopic pregnancy incidence per 1000 pregnancies (live births, induced abortions, and ectopic pregnancies) and 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated per study year, overall, and stratified by age group. The age-adjusted incidence and 95% CI was estimated per study year, overall, and stratified by race/ethnicity. Temporal trend was assessed using Poisson regression. RESULTS: There were 15,537 ectopic pregnancies among 979,027 pregnancies. The overall age-adjusted ectopic pregnancy incidence was 15.8 per 1000 pregnancies, 95% CI: 15.6, 16.1. The annual incidence increased from 15.2, 95% CI: 14.4, 16.1, in 2010 to 16.4, 95% CI: 15.6, 17.2, in 2019 (p < 0.001). The overall incidence was highest among women aged 40−44 years (24.2, 95% CI: 22.7, 25.6) and non-Hispanic Black women (21.9, 95% CI: 21.0, 22.8); compared to 30–34-year-old (16.2, 95% CI: 15.7, 16.6) and non-Hispanic White (14.6, 95% CI: 14.1, 15.0) women, respectively. DISCUSSION: The increase in ectopic pregnancy incidence during the studied period was largely driven by increasing incidence in younger women. However, disparities in the incidence by age and race/ethnicity persisted. CONCLUSION: Ectopic pregnancy remains a significant source of reproductive health morbidity, especially for older ( >40 years) and non-Hispanic Black women.

RationaleStress may contribute to relapse to alcohol use in part by enhancing reactivity to cues previously paired with alcohol. Yet, standard models of stress-induced reinstatement generally use contingent presentations of alcohol-paired cues to reinforce instrumental behaviors, making it difficult to isolate the ability of cues to invigorate alcohol-seeking.ObjectiveHere we sought to test the impact of stress on behavioral responses to alcohol-paired cues, using a model of stress-induced reinstatement of Pavlovian conditioned approach, inspired by Nadia Chaudhri’s work on context-induced reinstatement.MethodsLong Evans rats were trained to associate one auditory cue with delivery of alcohol or sucrose and an alternative auditory cue with no reward. Following extinction training, rats were exposed to a stressor prior to being re-exposed to the cues under extinction conditions. We assessed the effects of yohimbine, intermittent footshock and olfactory cues paired with social defeat on responses to alcohol-paired cues, and the effects of yohimbine on responses to sucrose-paired cues.ResultsThe pharmacological stressor, yohimbine, enhanced Pavlovian responses to both alcohol and sucrose cues, but intermittent footshock and social defeat cues did not.ConclusionsWhile yohimbine elicited reinstatement of Pavlovian conditioned responses, these effects may be unrelated to activation of stress systems.

OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to evaluate the association between pregnancy intentions and substance use in early pregnancy among pregnant women receiving prenatal care in a large, integrated healthcare system. METHODS The sample comprised 29,787 Kaiser Permanente Northern California pregnant women (12.1% aged

Stressful conditions in the tumor microenvironment induce autophagy in cancer cells as a mechanism to promote their survival. High levels of calcium within autophagosomes activates peptidylarginine deaminase enzymes which convert arginine residues within polypeptides to citrulline and alters proteolytic cleavage. In the presence of inflammation, the MHC-II pathway presents these new citrullinated peptides to CD4 T cells. Modi-1 vaccine comprising three citrullinated, adjuvanted peptides induces and expands a population of activated CD4 T cells. On reaching the tumor site the CD4 T cells release proinflammatory cytokines including, INFγ, which upregulates MHC class II and the same, but endogenous, modified peptides are presented on the tumor cell surface. This likely causes a positive feed-forward loop with killing of tumor cells. The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, cellular immune and tumor response to 2 citrullinated vimentin and one citrullinated enolase peptide each conjugated to the toll-like receptor 1/2 adjuvant Amplivant® ModiFY is an open-label, prospective, multicohort, multicenter, phase I/II basket trial. Eligible patients have unresectable disease in one of the following tumor types: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (SCCHN), Triple Negative Breast Cancer, Renal Cell Carcinoma and High Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma. Depending on the status of the disease and eligibility for standard of care (SOC) checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) monotherapy, patients will be treated either with Modi-1 alone or Modi-1 +SOC CPI. A randomized neoadjuvant sub-study in patients with SCCHN scheduled to have tumor resection surgery is included in the protocol. These patients are randomized 1:1 to receive either Modi-1 alone or Modi-1+ pembrolizumab. The primary endpoints are the adverse event rate as measured by CTCAE v5.0 in the initial dose escalation cohorts and the strength of the cellular immune response IFNγ enzyme-linked immune absorbent spot (ELISpot) assay in the dose expansion cohorts. Secondary endpoints (RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST), are objective response rate duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival. In the SCCHN neoadjuvant cohort, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in resected tumor tissue will be profiled using scRNAseq and immunohistochemistry. The study is an adaptive trial, comprising 3+3 dose escalation cohorts followed by a Simon 2-stage design in the dose expansion cohorts. The Modi-1 only dose expansion cohort will recruit 16 patients of each of the target tumor types, whilst the Modi-1+CPI will recruit a total of 21 patients. A total of 21/138 patients have been treated to date. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05329532 Citation Format: Lindy G. Durrant, Fayaz Masters, Samantha Paston, Robert Miller, David J. Pinato, Rebecca Herbertson, Anne Armstrong, Stefan Symeonides, Christian Ottensmeier. Modi-1, anti-citrullinated neoepitope vaccine alone and combined with checkpoint inhibitors in patients with head and neck, breast, renal and ovarian carcinoma: protocol for the ModiFY phase I/II basket clinical Ttial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT256.

Objective To develop a longitudinal algorithm combining two biomarkers, CA125 and HE4, for early detection of ovarian cancer in women with BRCA mutations. Methods Women with BRCA mutations and intact ovaries were invited to participate in a novel ovarian cancer early detection prospective study. The Risk of Ovarian Cancer Algorithm (ROCA) identifying significant increases above each woman's baseline in serum CA125 and HE4 was performed every four months; abnormal risks triggered a subsequent ultrasound. The study first used a risk algorithm for only CA125, a second algorithm was developed for HE4 and finally a risk algorithm combining the two biomarkers was implemented. The ROCA strategy was compared to Standard of Care (SOC) surveillance strategy. Results A total of 149 women enrolled in the ROCA arm while 43 women enrolled in the SOC arm. Abnormal scores were found in 24% of ROCA CA125 tests, 16% if ROCA CA125 or the novel ROCA HE4 were used independently and reduced to 8% using the new two-marker ROCA, significantly lower than the 15% of abnormal tests seen in the SOC arm (p = 0.042). The average false positive rate among women without ovarian cancer for two-marker ROCA for referral to ultrasound was 6.6% (specificity 93.4%), and for the two-marker ROCA plus ultrasound for referral to surgical consultation was 1.7% (specificity 98.3%). Conclusion A newly developed two-marker ROCA administered every 4 months had lower call-back rates than SOC surveillance. Having established high specificity, the two-marker ROCA score deserves further evaluation for sensitivity in a larger trial.

ObjectiveImmunohistochemistry screening is a reliable method for identifying women with endometrial cancer who are at risk for Lynch syndrome, but clinical workflows used to implement immunohistochemistry screening protocols can vary by institution. The goal of this study was to investigate variation in performance of immunohistochemistry screening when a physician order is required.MethodsRetrospective study from an integrated healthcare system with a risk-based immunohistochemistry screening policy for Lynch syndrome from January 2015 to December 2016. Immunohistochemistry screening was indicated for all women with endometrial cancer aged ResultsThere were 1399 eligible patients in the study. With a required physician order, immunohistochemistry screening rates (20% overall, 34% aged ConclusionsImmunohistochemistry screening rates in women with endometrial cancer were lower in our health system compared with prior reports in the literature, and there were variations in screening performance according to patient age, race, and body mass index. Requiring a physician order for immunohistochemistry screening likely creates a barrier in screening uptake, therefore automated immunohistochemistry screening is recommended.

Compare detection of Lynch syndrome in endometrial cancer between regions of a health care system with different screening strategies.A retrospective study of endometrial cancer (EC) cases from 2 regions of an integrated health care system (Kaiser Permanente Northern (KPNC) and Southern (KPSC) California). Within KPNC, immunohistochemistry tumor screening (IHC) was physician ordered and risk-based; within KPSC, IHC was universal and automated. Clinical risk factors associated with abnormal IHC and Lynch Syndrome (LS) were identified.During the study, there were 2045 endometrial cancers: 1399 in the physician-order group and 646 in the universal testing group. In the physician-order group: among womenage 60, 34% underwent IHC; 9.6% were abnormal, and 3% were possible LS after methylation testing; among women ≥60, 11% underwent IHC, 3% were abnormal and1% were possible LS. In the universal group, 87% of women age60 had IHC, 19.4% were abnormal, and 6% were possible LS; Among women age ≥60, 82% underwent IHC, 26% were abnormal, and 2% were possible LS. There were no differences in LS cases between the physician-order group and the universal group in either age strata (60: 3% vs. 3.6%, p=0.62; ≥60:1% vs. 1%, p=0.63) Factors associated with LS were younger age (odds ratio (OR) 0.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04-0.29) and lower body mass index (BMI), (OR 0.38 95% CI 0.18-0.80).Universal IHC screening did not result in increased LS detection in EC.

Intrauterine devices are effective instruments for contraception, and 1 levonorgestrel-releasing device is also indicated for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding (menorrhagia).To compare the incidence of intrauterine device expulsion and uterine perforation in women with and without a diagnosis of menorrhagia within the first 12 months before device insertion STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in 3 integrated healthcare systems (Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Southern California, and Washington) and a healthcare information exchange (Regenstrief Institute) in the United States using electronic health records. Nonpostpartum women aged ≤50 years with intrauterine device (eg, levonorgestrel or copper) insertions from 2001 to 2018 and without a delivery in the previous 12 months were studied in this analysis. Recent menorrhagia diagnosis (ie, recorded ≤12 months before insertion) was ascertained from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. The study outcomes, viz, device expulsion and device-related uterine perforation (complete or partial), were ascertained from electronic medical records and validated in the data sources. The cumulative incidence and crude incidence rates with 95% confidence intervals were estimated. Cox proportional hazards models estimated the crude and adjusted hazard ratios using propensity score overlap weighting (13-16 variables) and 95% confidence intervals.Among 228,834 nonpostpartum women, the mean age was 33.1 years, 44.4% of them were White, and 31,600 (13.8%) had a recent menorrhagia diagnosis. Most women had a levonorgestrel-releasing device (96.4% of those with and 78.2% of those without a menorrhagia diagnosis). Women with a menorrhagia diagnosis were likely to be older, obese, and have dysmenorrhea or fibroids. Women with a menorrhagia diagnosis had a higher intrauterine device-expulsion rate (40.01 vs 10.92 per 1000 person-years) than those without, especially evident in the first few months after insertion. Women with a menorrhagia diagnosis had a higher cumulative incidence (95% confidence interval) of expulsion (7.00% [6.70-7.32] at 1 year and 12.03% [11.52-12.55] at 5 years) vs those without (1.77% [1.70-1.84] at 1 year and 3.69% [3.56-3.83] at 5 years). The risk of expulsion was increased for women with a menorrhagia diagnosis vs for those without (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.84 [95% confidence interval, 2.66-3.03]). The perforation rate was low overall (1/1000 person-years) but higher in women with a diagnosis of menorrhagia vs in those without (0.98 vs 0.63 per 1000 person-years). The cumulative incidence (95% confidence interval) of uterine perforation was slightly higher for women with a menorrhagia diagnosis (0.09% [0.06-0.14] at 1 year and 0.39% [0.29-0.53] at 5 years) than those without it (0.07% [0.06-0.08] at 1 year and 0.28% [0.24-0.33] at 5 years). The risk of perforation was slightly increased in women with a menorrhagia diagnosis vs in those without (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-2.13).The risk of expulsion is significantly higher in women with a recent diagnosis of menorrhagia. Patient education and counseling regarding the potential expulsion risk is recommended at insertion. The absolute risk of perforation for women with a recent diagnosis of menorrhagia is very low. The increased expulsion and perforation rates observed are likely because of causal factors of menorrhagia.

Reports of perforation risk related to intrauterine devices (IUDs) inserted immediately post partum and among non-post-partum individuals are scarce, and previous studies with only 12-month follow-ups underestimate the risk. Breastfeeding at IUD insertion and insertion within 36 weeks post partum have been associated with increased risk of uterine perforation. The aim of these analyses was to compare the incidence and risks of IUD-related uterine perforations by non-post-partum and post-partum intervals at IUD insertion, and among post-partum individuals, to assess the impact of breastfeeding on these outcomes.We did a multisite cohort study in the USA, using electronic health records (EHR). Study sites were three health-care systems and a site that used data from a health-care information exchange. The study population included individuals who were aged 50 years or younger and had an IUD insertion between Jan 1, 2001, and April 30, 2018. Individuals were excluded if they had not been in the health-care system for at least 12 months before IUD insertion. The primary outcome for this analysis was any IUD-related uterine perforation diagnosis for the first IUD insertion in this time period. Both complete and partial IUD-related perforations were identified. Chart abstraction was done to validate EHR-based algorithms or confirm perforations. The crude rate and cumulative incidence of uterine perforation were evaluated by non-post-partum and post-partum intervals at IUD insertion in the full cohort, and by breastfeeding status in a subcohort of post-partum individuals. Cox models estimated crude and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs).Data from 326 658 individuals in the full cohort and 94 817 individuals in the post-partum subcohort were analysed. In the full cohort, we identified 1008 uterine perforations (51·2% complete), with the 5-year cumulative incidence being the lowest in the non-post-partum group (0·29%, 95% CI 0·26-0·34). The aHR for the post-partum interval relative to non-post partum ranged from 2·73 (95% CI 1·33-5·63; 0 to 3 days post partum) to 6·71 (4·80-9·38; 4 days to ≤6 weeks post partum). The post-partum subcohort of individuals with breastfeeding information had 673 uterine perforations (62% complete), with a 5-year cumulative incidence of 1·37% (95% CI 1·24-1·52) and an increased risk with breastfeeding (aHR 1·37, 95% CI 1·12-1·66).Although the risk for uterine perforation with IUD insertion 4 days to 6 weeks or less post partum is nearly seven times that of insertion non-post partum, perforation remains an incredibly rare event for all clinical time points. Despite a slight increased risk of perforation with breastfeeding at IUD insertion, the benefits of breastfeeding and effective contraception generally outweigh risks and should have little clinical impact. Therefore, IUD insertion timing should be based on individual desire for IUD contraception and patient convenience to assure an IUD insertion can occur. Careful follow-up of individuals at higher risk of uterine perforation is warranted.Bayer AG.

Pancreatic fibrosis (PF) is an essential component of the pathobiology of chronic pancreatitis (CP) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Activated pancreatic myofibroblasts (PMFs) are crucial for the deposition of the extracellular matrix, and fibrotic reaction in response to sustained signaling. Consequently, understanding of the molecular mechanisms of PMF activation is not only critical for understanding CP and PDAC biology but is also a fertile area of research for the development of novel therapeutic strategies for pancreatic pathologies. This review analyzes the key signaling events that drive PMF activation including, initiating signals from transforming growth factor-β1, platelet derived growth factor, as well as other microenvironmental cues, like hypoxia and extracellular matrix rigidity. Further, we discussed the intracellular signal events contributing to PMF activation, and crosstalk with different components of tumor microenvironment. Additionally, association of epidemiologically established risk factors for CP and PDAC, like alcohol intake, tobacco exposure, and metabolic factors with PMF activation, is discussed to comprehend the role of lifestyle factors on pancreatic pathologies. Overall, this analysis provides insight into the biology of PMF activation and highlights salient features of this process, which offer promising therapeutic targets.

Mary S Anthony,1 Mary Anne Armstrong,2 Darios Getahun,3 Delia Scholes,4 Jennifer Gatz,5 Renate Schulze-Rath,6 Debbie Postlethwaite,2 Maqdooda Merchant,2 Amy L Alabaster,2 Giulia Chillemi,2 Tina Raine-Bennett,2 Fagen Xie,3 Vicki Y Chiu,3 Theresa M Im,3 Harpreet S Takhar,3 Michael Fassett,3 Jane Grafton,4 David Cronkite,4 Laura Ichikawa,4 Susan D Reed,4,7 Siu Lui Hui,5 Mary E Ritchey,1 Catherine W Saltus,8 Elizabeth B Andrews,1 Kenneth J Rothman,8 Alex Asiimwe,6 Richard Lynen,9 Juliane Schoendorf101RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA; 2Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA; 3Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA; 4Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; 5Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, USA; 6Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany; 7University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; 8RTI Health Solutions, Waltham, MA, USA; 9Bayer HealthCare, Whippany, NJ, USA; 10Bayer OY, Espoo, FinlandObjective: To validate algorithms identifying uterine perforations and intrauterine device (IUD) expulsions and to ascertain availability of breastfeeding status at the time of IUD insertion.Study design and setting: Four health care systems with electronic health records (EHRs) participated: Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC), Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC), Kaiser Permanente Washington (KPWA), and Regenstrief Institute (RI). The study included women ≤50 years of age with an IUD insertion. Site-specific algorithms using structured and unstructured data were developed and a sample validated by EHR review. Positive predictive values (PPVs) of the algorithms were calculated. Breastfeeding status was assessed in a random sample of 125 women at each research site with IUD placement within 52 weeks postpartum.Results: The study population included 282,028 women with 325,582 IUD insertions. The PPVs for uterine perforation were KPNC 77%, KPSC 81%, KPWA 82%, and RI 47%; PPVs for IUD expulsion were KPNC 77%, KPSC 87%, KPWA 68%, and RI 37%. Across all research sites, breastfeeding status at the time of IUD insertion was determined for 94% of those sampled.Conclusions: Algorithms with a high PPV for uterine perforation and IUD expulsion were developed at 3 of the 4 research sites. Breastfeeding status at the time of IUD insertion could be determined at all research sites. Our findings suggest that a study to evaluate the associations of breastfeeding and postpartum IUD insertions with risk of uterine perforation and IUD expulsion can be successfully conducted retrospectively; however, automated application of algorithms must be supplemented with chart review for some outcomes at one research site due to low PPV.Keywords: electronic health records, intrauterine device, breastfeeding, validation study, algorithm, postpartum

Background Cross-sectional studies indicate an elevated prevalence of prenatal marijuana use in women with nausea and vomiting in pregnancy (NVP). However, it is unknown whether differences in marijuana use by NVP status have persisted over time as marijuana becomes more acceptable and accessible and prenatal use increases overall. We compared trends in prenatal marijuana use by NVP status in the first trimester of pregnancy using data from Kaiser Permanente Northern California’s (KPNC) large healthcare system. Methods The sample comprised KPNC pregnant women aged ≥12 who completed a self-administered questionnaire on marijuana use and a urine toxicology test for cannabis during standard prenatal care from 2009 to 2016. The annual prevalence of marijuana use via self-report or toxicology by NVP status was estimated using Poisson regression with a log link function, adjusting for sociodemographics and parity. We tested for linear trends and differences in trends by NVP. Results Of 220,510 pregnancies, 38,831 (17.6%) had an NVP diagnosis. Prenatal marijuana use was elevated each year among women with NVP. The adjusted prevalence of use increased significantly from 2009 to 2016 at an annual rate of 1.086 (95%CI = 1.069–1.104) among women with NVP, from 6.5% (95%CI = 5.7%–7.2%) to 11.1% (95%CI = 0.2%–12.0%), and 1.069 (95%CI = 1.059–1.080) among women without NVP, from 3.4% (95%CI = 3.2%–3.7%) to 5.8% (95%CI = 5.5%–6.1%). Trends did not vary by NVP status. Discussion The prevalence of prenatal marijuana use has remained elevated over time among women with NVP. Clinicians should ask pregnant patients about their reasons for marijuana use and treat NVP with evidence-based interventions.

Intrauterine devices, including levonorgestrel-releasing and copper devices, are highly effective long-acting reversible contraceptives. The potential risks associated with intrauterine devices are low and include uterine perforation and device expulsion.This study aimed to evaluate the risk of perforation and expulsion associated with levonorgestrel-releasing devices vs copper devices in clinical practice in the United States.The Association of Perforation and Expulsion of Intrauterine Device study was a retrospective cohort study of women aged ≤50 years with an intrauterine device insertion during 2001 to 2018 and information on intrauterine device type and patient and medical characteristics. Of note, 4 research sites with access to electronic health records contributed data for the study: 3 Kaiser Permanente-integrated healthcare systems (Northern California, Southern California, and Washington) and 1 healthcare system using data from a healthcare information exchange in Indiana (Regenstrief Institute). Perforation was classified as any extension of the device into or through the myometrium. Expulsion was classified as complete (not visible in the uterus or abdomen or patient reported) or partial (any portion in the cervix or malpositioned). We estimated the crude incidence rates and crude cumulative incidence by intrauterine device type. The risks of perforation and expulsion associated with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices vs copper intrauterine devices were estimated using Cox proportional-hazards regression with propensity score overlap weighting to adjust for confounders.Among 322,898 women included in this analysis, the incidence rates of perforation per 1000 person-years were 1.64 (95% confidence interval, 1.53-1.76) for levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices and 1.27 (95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.48) for copper intrauterine devices; 1-year and 5-year crude cumulative incidence was 0.22% (95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.24) and 0.63% (95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.68) for levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices and 0.16% (95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.20) and 0.55% (95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.68) for copper intrauterine devices, respectively. The incidence rates of expulsion per 1000 person-years were 13.95 (95% confidence interval, 13.63-14.28) for levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices and 14.08 (95% confidence interval, 13.44-14.75) for copper intrauterine devices; 1-year and 5-year crude cumulative incidence was 2.30% (95% confidence interval, 2.24-2.36) and 4.52% (95% confidence interval, 4.40-4.65) for levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices and 2.30% (95% confidence interval, 2.18-2.44) and 4.82 (95% confidence interval, 4.56-5.10) for copper intrauterine devices, respectively. Comparing levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices with copper intrauterine devices, the adjusted hazard ratios were 1.49 (95% confidence intervals, 1.25-1.78) for perforation and 0.69 (95% confidence intervals, 0.65-0.73) for expulsion.After adjusting for potential confounders, levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices were associated with an increased risk of uterine perforation and a decreased risk of expulsion relative to copper intrauterine devices. Given that the absolute numbers of these events are low in both groups, these differences may not be clinically meaningful.

BACKGROUND Previous studies have identified an association between traumatic brain injuries and the development of psychiatric disorders in general. However, these studies were subject to limitations that demonstrate the need for a study of a large, clearly defined mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) population within an integrated healthcare system. OBJECTIVE To determine the prevalence and relative risk of postinjury affective disorders over 4 years following mTBI. DESIGN Cohort study of mTBI cases and matched controls, over a 4-year period. SETTING An integrated healthcare delivery system in California. PATIENTS A total of 9428 adult health plan members diagnosed with mTBI from 2000-2007 and enrolled in the year before injury, during which no TBI was ascertained. Control participants included 18,856 individuals selected based on the following criteria: Two unexposed health plan members per each mTBI-exposed patient were randomly selected and individually matched for age, gender, race/ethnicity, and medical comorbidities. INTERVENTIONS Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES A diagnosis of affective disorder (depressive, anxiety, and adjustment disorders) in the 4 years after mTBI or the reference date, determined according to the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification as well as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision. RESULTS Affective disorders were most prominent during the first 12 months with 23% following mTBI and 14% in the control group. Four-year aggregate adjusted odds ratios for having an affective disorder following mTBI were 1.2 (95% CI: 1.1, 1.2; p

Background In the phase III OlympiAD trial, olaparib significantly increased progression-free survival (PFS) compared with chemotherapy of physician's choice in patients with germline BRCA-mutated (gBRCAm), human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC). The phase IIIb LUCY trial assessed the clinical effectiveness of olaparib in similar patients, in a setting reflecting clinical practice. Methods This open-label, single-arm trial of olaparib (300 mg, twice daily) enrolled patients with BRCAm, HER2-negative mBC who had received taxane and/or anthracycline in the (neo)adjuvant/metastatic setting and not more than two lines of prior chemotherapy for mBC. Patients with hormone receptor–positive mBC had progressed on at least one line of endocrine therapy in an adjuvant/metastatic setting and were unsuitable for further endocrine treatment. This interim analysis was planned after 160 PFS events. Results Of 563 patients screened, 252 patients with gBRCAm were enrolled and received at least one dose of olaparib. The median investigator-assessed PFS was 8.11 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.93–8.67; 166/252 events [65.9% maturity]). The investigator-assessed clinical response rate was 48.6%, and median time to first subsequent treatment or death was 9.66 months (95% CI, 8.67–11.14). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; >20% patients) were nausea, anaemia, asthenia, vomiting and fatigue. Eleven patients (4.4%) discontinued treatment because of a TEAE. Grade 3 or higher TEAEs occurred in 64 patients (25.4%), including anaemia (33 patients; 13.1%). Conclusion Olaparib was clinically effective in patients with gBRCAm, HER2-negative mBC with safety outcomes consistent with previous findings. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03286842 .

Intrauterine device (IUD) expulsion increases the risk of unintended pregnancy; how timing of postpartum IUD insertion and breastfeeding are associated with risk of expulsion is relevant to the benefit-risk profile.To evaluate the association of postpartum timing of IUD insertion and breastfeeding status with incidence and risk of IUD expulsion.The Association of Perforation and Expulsion of Intrauterine Devices (APEX-IUD) cohort study included women aged 50 years or younger with an IUD insertion between 2001 and 2018. The breastfeeding analysis focused on a subcohort of women at 52 or fewer weeks post partum with known breastfeeding status. The study was conducted using data from electronic health records (EHRs) at 4 research sites with access to EHR: 3 Kaiser Permanente sites (Northern California, Southern California, Washington) and the Regenstrief Institute (Indiana). Data analysis was conducted from June to November 2019.Timing of IUD insertion post partum was categorized into discrete time periods: 0 to 3 days, 4 days to 6 or fewer weeks, more than 6 weeks to 14 or fewer weeks, more than 14 weeks to 52 or fewer weeks, and non-post partum (52 weeks or no evidence of delivery). Breastfeeding status at the time of insertion was determined from clinical records, diagnostic codes, or questionnaires from well-baby visits.Incidence rates and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) were estimated using propensity scores to adjust for confounding.The full cohort included 326 658 women (mean [SD] age, 32.0 [8.3] years; 38 911 [11.9%] Asian or Pacific Islander; 696 [0.2%] Hispanic Black; 56 180 [17.2%] Hispanic other; 42 501 [13.0%] Hispanic White; 28 323 [8.7%] non-Hispanic Black; 137 102 [42.0%] non-Hispanic White), and the subcohort included 94 817 women. Most IUDs were levonorgestrel-releasing (259 234 [79.4%]). There were 8943 expulsions. The 5-year cumulative incidence of IUD expulsion was highest for insertions 0 to 3 days post partum (10.73%; 95% CI, 9.12%-12.61%) and lowest for insertions more than 6 weeks to 14 or fewer weeks post partum (3.18%; 95% CI, 2.95%-3.42%). Adjusted HRs using women with non-post partum IUD insertion as the referent were 5.34 (95% CI, 4.47-6.39) for those with postpartum insertion at 0 to 3 days; 1.22 (95% CI, 1.05-1.41) for those with postpartum insertion at 4 days to 6 or fewer weeks; 1.06 (95% CI, 0.95-1.18) for those with postpartum insertion at more than 6 to 14 or fewer weeks; and 1.43 (95% CI, 1.29-1.60) for those with postpartum insertion at more than 14 to 52 or fewer weeks. In the subcohort, 5-year cumulative incidence was 3.49% (95% CI, 3.25%-3.73%) for breastfeeding women and 4.57% (95% CI, 4.22%-4.95%) for nonbreastfeeding women; the adjusted HR for breastfeeding vs not breastfeeding was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.64-0.78).In this study of real-world data, IUD expulsion was rare but more common with immediate postpartum insertion. Breastfeeding was associated with lower expulsion risk.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to identify a five-fraction schedule of adjuvant radiotherapy (radiation therapy) delivered in 1 week that is non-inferior in terms of local cancer control and is as safe as an international standard 15-fraction regimen after primary surgery for early breast cancer. Here, we present 5-year results of the FAST-Forward trial.METHODS: FAST-Forward is a multicentre, phase 3, randomised, non-inferiority trial done at 97 hospitals (47 radiotherapy centres and 50 referring hospitals) in the UK. Patients aged at least 18 years with invasive carcinoma of the breast (pT1-3, pN0-1, M0) after breast conservation surgery or mastectomy were eligible. We randomly allocated patients to either 40 Gy in 15 fractions (over 3 weeks), 27 Gy in five fractions (over 1 week), or 26 Gy in five fractions (over 1 week) to the whole breast or chest wall. Allocation was not masked because of the nature of the intervention. The primary endpoint was ipsilateral breast tumour relapse; assuming a 2% 5-year incidence for 40 Gy, non-inferiority was predefined as ≤1·6% excess for five-fraction schedules (critical hazard ratio [HR] of 1·81). Normal tissue effects were assessed by clinicians, patients, and from photographs. This trial is registered at isrctn.com, ISRCTN19906132.FINDINGS: Between Nov 24, 2011, and June 19, 2014, we recruited and obtained consent from 4096 patients from 97 UK centres, of whom 1361 were assigned to the 40 Gy schedule, 1367 to the 27 Gy schedule, and 1368 to the 26 Gy schedule. At a median follow-up of 71·5 months (IQR 71·3 to 71·7), the primary endpoint event occurred in 79 patients (31 in the 40 Gy group, 27 in the 27 Gy group, and 21 in the 26 Gy group); HRs versus 40 Gy in 15 fractions were 0·86 (95% CI 0·51 to 1·44) for 27 Gy in five fractions and 0·67 (0·38 to 1·16) for 26 Gy in five fractions. 5-year incidence of ipsilateral breast tumour relapse after 40 Gy was 2·1% (1·4 to 3·1); estimated absolute differences versus 40 Gy in 15 fractions were -0·3% (-1·0 to 0·9) for 27 Gy in five fractions (probability of incorrectly accepting an inferior five-fraction schedule: p=0·0022 vs 40 Gy in 15 fractions) and -0·7% (-1·3 to 0·3) for 26 Gy in five fractions (p=0·00019 vs 40 Gy in 15 fractions). At 5 years, any moderate or marked clinician-assessed normal tissue effects in the breast or chest wall was reported for 98 of 986 (9·9%) 40 Gy patients, 155 (15·4%) of 1005 27 Gy patients, and 121 of 1020 (11·9%) 26 Gy patients. Across all clinician assessments from 1-5 years, odds ratios versus 40 Gy in 15 fractions were 1·55 (95% CI 1·32 to 1·83, pINTERPRETATION: 26 Gy in five fractions over 1 week is non-inferior to the standard of 40 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks for local tumour control, and is as safe in terms of normal tissue effects up to 5 years for patients prescribed adjuvant local radiotherapy after primary surgery for early-stage breast cancer.FUNDING: National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme.

INTRODUCTION: Screening and referral for substance use are essential components of prenatal care. However, little is known about barriers to participation in substance use interventions that are integrated within prenatal care. METHODS: Our study examines demographic and clinical correlates of participation in an initial assessment and counseling intervention integrated into prenatal care in a large healthcare system. The sample comprised Kaiser Permanente Northern California pregnant women with a live birth in 2014 or 2015 who screened positive for prenatal substance use via a self-reported questionnaire and/or urine toxicology test given as part of standard prenatal care (at ~8 weeks gestation). RESULTS: Of the 11,843 women who screened positive for prenatal substance use (median age =30 years; 42% white; 38% screened positive for alcohol only, 20% for cannabis only, 5% nicotine only, 17% other drugs only, and 19% ≥2 substance categories), 9,836 (83%) completed the initial substance use assessment and counseling intervention. Results from multivariable logistic regression analyses indicated that younger age, lower income, single marital status, and a positive urine toxicology test predicted higher odds of participation, while other/unknown race/ethnicity, greater parity, receiving the screening later in pregnancy, and screening positive for alcohol only or other drugs only predicted lower odds of participation (all Ps

OBJECTIVE: To examine trends and correlates of frequency of self-reported alcohol and nicotine use among pregnant women. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 363,240 pregnancies from 2009–2017 screened for self-reported substance use at their first prenatal visit in Kaiser Permanente Northern California. Poisson regression with a log link function was used to estimate the annual prevalences of self-reported daily, weekly, and ≤monthly alcohol and nicotine use, adjusting for socio-demographics. Generalized estimating equation models were used to estimate the adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of any self-reported prenatal alcohol or nicotine use among those who self-reported use in the year prior to pregnancy, by frequency of pre-pregnancy substance use and socio-demographics. RESULTS: The sample was 64% non-White [mean (SD) age=30.1 (5.6)]. From 2009 to 2017, alcohol use before pregnancy increased from 63.4% to 65.9% (trend p-value=.008), and prenatal alcohol use decreased from 11.6% to 8.8% (trend p-value

Background Surveillance of ectopic pregnancy (EP) using electronic databases is important. To our knowledge, no published study has assessed the validity of EP case ascertainment using electronic health records. Objective We aimed to assess the validity of an enhanced version of a previously validated algorithm, which used a combination of encounters with EP-related diagnostic/procedure codes and methotrexate injections. Methods Medical records of 500 women aged 15-44 years with membership at Kaiser Permanente Southern and Northern California between 2009 and 2018 and a potential EP were randomly selected for chart review, and true cases were identified. The enhanced algorithm included diagnostic/procedure codes from the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, used telephone appointment visits, and excluded cases with only abdominal EP diagnosis codes. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall performance (Youden index and F-score) of the algorithm were evaluated and compared to the validated algorithm. Results There were 334 true positive and 166 true negative EP cases with available records. True positive and true negative EP cases did not differ significantly according to maternal age, race/ethnicity, and smoking status. EP cases with only one encounter and non-tubal EPs were more likely to be misclassified. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the enhanced algorithm for EP were 97.6%, 84.9%, 92.9%, and 94.6%, respectively. The Youden index and F-score were 82.5% and 95.2%, respectively. The sensitivity and NPV were lower for the previously published algorithm at 94.3% and 88.1%, respectively. The sensitivity of surgical procedure codes from electronic chart abstraction to correctly identify surgical management was 91.9%. The overall accuracy, defined as the percentage of EP cases with correct management (surgical, medical, and unclassified) identified by electronic chart abstraction, was 92.3%. Conclusions The performance of the enhanced algorithm for EP case ascertainment in integrated health care databases is adequate to allow for use in future epidemiological studies. Use of this algorithm will likely result in better capture of true EP cases than the previously validated algorithm.