Search

Robotic surgery is used for the surgical removal of female pelvic malignancies and encompasses procedures as radical cystectomy and radical hysterectomy. The aim of this paper is to provide an update of level 1 literature evidence about the outcomes of robotic surgery compared to other surgical approaches for the treatment of bladder, endometrial and cervical cancer. A non- systematic search of the PubMed and Scopus databases was conducted to identify peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing surgical approaches for radical cystectomy and hysterectomy. To the purpose of capturing the lastest updates, 2020–2022 literature was reviewed. In the field of radical cystectomy, two RCTs supported the implementation of robotics as a more beneficial approach than open surgery - in terms of faster recovery, less thromboembolic events, less infectious events. In gynecology, despite robotics is accepted for the treatment of early endometrial tumors, the role of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for the treatment of cervical cancer is still debated, with two recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses reporting conflicting results. Two- decades after the introduction of robotic surgery, there is still a number of current studies evaluating its role for the treatment of urological pelvic malignancies, especially for bladder cancer. The role of robotic surgery alone for the treatment of gynecological malignancies has been scarcely addressed with robotics being mostly evaluated as a part of MIS; updates about MIS for the treatment of cervical cancer continue to be ongoing.

Introduction The term placenta praevia defines a placenta that lies over the internal os, whereas the term low-lying placenta identifies a placenta that is partially implanted in the lower uterine segment with the inferior placental edge located at 1–20 mm from the internal cervical os (internal-os-distance). The most appropriate mode of birth in women with low-lying placenta is still controversial, with the majority of them undergoing caesarean section. The current project aims to evaluate the rate of vaginal birth and caesarean section in labour due to bleeding by offering a trial of labour to all women with an internal-os-distance >5 mm as assessed by transvaginal sonography in the late third trimester.Methods and analysis The MODEL-PLACENTA is a prospective, multicentre, 1:3 matched case–control study involving 17 Maternity Units across Lombardy and Emilia-Romagna regions, Italy. The study includes women with a placenta located in the lower uterine segment at the second trimester scan. Women with a normally located placenta will be enrolled as controls. A sample size of 30 women with an internal-os-distance >5 mm at the late third trimester scan is needed at each participating Unit. Since the incidence of low-lying placenta decreases from 2% in the second trimester to 0.4% at the end of pregnancy, 150 women should be recruited at each centre at the second trimester scan. A vaginal birth rate ≥60% in women with an internal-os-distance >5 mm will be considered appropriate to start routinely admitting to labour these women.Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval for the study was given by the Brianza Ethics Committee (No 3157, 2019). Written informed consent will be obtained from study participants. Results will be disseminated by publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentation in international conferences.Trial registration number NCT04827433 (pre-results stage)