Annalisa Piccinno, Nadja Hawwa Vissing, Mirco Govoni, Daniela Acerbi, Bo L. Chawes, Nasim Samandari, Eskil Kreiner-Møller, Maja Deleuran, Erik Nilsson, Li Juel Mortensen, Amalie Bisgaard, Hans Bisgaard, and Nanna L. Skytt
Inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2-agonists are medications taken daily on a long-term basis to keep asthma under clinical control. Studies have shown that delivering this therapy in a combination inhaler is as effective as giving each drug separately, but fixed combination inhalers are more convenient for adolescents with asthma, increasing treatment adherence and ensuring that long-acting β2-agonists are always accompanied by inhaled corticosteroids [1,2]. An extrafine fixed combination of beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) and formoterol fumarate (FF) is marketed both as a pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) and as a dry powder inhaler (DPI), as Foster® and Foster® Nexthaler® (Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., Parma, Italy) [3], respectively, at the dose strength of 100/6 μg for patients with asthma ≥18 years of age. The same dose strength is currently being developed in asthmatic adolescents aged 12–17 years. The purpose of this study was to investigate the systemic availability of B17MP (active metabolite of BDP) and formoterol after inhalation of an extrafine fixed combination of BDP/FF 100/6 μg via the NEXThaler® DPI in comparison to the free combination of BDP (Clenil® Pulvinal® 100 μg) and FF (Foradil® Aerolizer® 12 μg) DPIs (Novartis Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Frimley, UK) at a total single dose of 400/24 μg in asthmatic adolescents. Adolescents aged 12–17 years with mild-to-moderate asthma in a stable state participated in this randomized, crossover, single-dose study with two active treatment periods conducted at the Children's Asthma Clinic, Copenhagen, Denmark (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01191424). On each treatment day, blood was sampled for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessments before and 5, 15 and 30 min and 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 h after actuation of the DPIs [4]. Lung function [forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)] and heart rate were assessed concomitantly and adverse events recorded (see Appendix S1 for details). Pharmacokinetic end-points were as follows: area under the plasma drug concentration–time curve (AUC0–t), maximal plasma concentration (Cmax) and terminal half-life (t1/2) for B17MP and formoterol. The AUC0–t for B17MP was the primary end-point. Pharmacodynamic end-points were as follows: plasma potassium and plasma cortisol minimum plasma concentration (Cmin) and AUC0–t, plasma glucose Cmax and AUC0–2h, time-averaged FEV1 (AUC0–8h/8h) and heart rate (AUC0–8h/8h). All variables were log-transformed and treatment comparisons made using ANOVA models estimating the ratio of the adjusted geometric means test/reference (fixed/free combination) with the corresponding 90% confidence interval (CI) for the pharmacokinetic variables and 95% CI for the pharmacodynamic variables. Bioequivalence for the variables between treatments was demonstrated if the CIs were within the 0.8–1.25 acceptance region [5]. The study design had 90% power to reject the null hypothesis that the upper limit of the 90% CI for the ratio of test/reference means above 1.25 for B17MP AUC0–t. Twenty-seven adolescents [55% males; mean age (SD), 14 years (1.7)] completed the study. The B17MP AUC0–t was slightly higher following BDP/FF NEXThaler® vs. BDP and FF DPIs: test/reference ratio 1.14 (90% CI, 1.03–1.28; Table 1). The plasma cortisol test/reference ratio lower 90% CI bound was just below 0.8 [AUC0–t ratio, 0.92 (0.79–1.06)], but no plasma cortisol levels were below the lower clinical normal limit (5 ng ml−1) in either treatment group. Formoterol AUC0–t was higher following test vs. reference treatment [ratio, 1.46 (1.36–1.56)] and Cmax significantly increased [ratio, 2.83 (2.56–3.13)], but time to Cmax was the same for both treatments (median, 0.08 h). The plasma potassium [AUC0–t test/reference ratio, 0.98 (0.95–1.00)], plasma glucose [AUC0–2h ratio, 1.02 (0.99–1.05)] and heart rate [AUC0–8h/8h ratio, 1.05 (1.01–1.09)] were all within the predefined bioequivalence limit. The treatment effects on FEV1 were similar, and no notable differences in adverse events were observed (see Appendix S1). Table 1 Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic comparison of BDP/FF 400/24 μg inhaled from the fixed BDP/FF 100/6 μg NEXThaler® DPI vs. BDP (Clenil® Pulvinal® 100 μg) and FF ... In adolescents with asthma, the systemic exposure to B17MP following four actuations of BDP/FF 100/6 μg NEXThaler® DPI compared with four actuations of BDP (Clenil® Pulvinal® 100 μg) and two actuations of FF (Foradil® Aerolizer® 12 μg) DPIs was slightly above the 125% bioequivalence limit, with a minor suppression of plasma cortisol levels. The clinical relevance of such suppression should be assessed after repeated administration according to European Medicines Agency guidelines [5]. Formoterol exposure was higher after administration of the fixed vs. free combination, but with comparable systemic effect in terms of heart rate, plasma glucose and plasma potassium. The FEV1 and safety profiles were also comparable. Potassium AUC0–t and Cmin were not affected by the increased formoterol exposure, which may be due to the transient formoterol peak concentration and the time delay between concentration and response or, alternatively, assay insensitivity. We speculate that the increased systemic exposure to formoterol and the slightly increased exposure to B17MP following the fixed BDP/FF NEXThaler® is caused by device-dependent different lung deposition. The BDP/FF NEXThaler® is an extrafine particle DPI with a low minimal inhalation flow threshold [6] in comparison to the Foradil® Aerolizer®, which requires a flow >60 l min−1, below which deagglomeration may be inefficient, resulting in a reduced emitted dose with larger particles and reduced lung deposition. In conclusion, inhalation from BDP/FF 100/6 μg NEXThaler® DPI resulted in a very similar exposure to B17MP but a greater exposure to formoterol compared with the licensed free combination in asthmatic adolescents. However, the greater bioavailability of formoterol following dosing with NEXThaler® had no systemic impact and did not affect the safety profile. For conduction of future bioequivalence trials, we highly recommend usage of devices with comparable lung deposition characteristics, because systemic absorption in adolescents seems to differ according to the device, which may have safety implications.