Search

Capsule: Space use and flight attributes of Lesser Kestrels were revealed by global positioning system tagging at two breeding colonies in Italy. Foraging flight distances and home-range sizes were both intermediate in comparison to previous studies in higher and lower quality habitats.

Aim: Migratory animals regularly move between often distant breeding and non‐breeding ranges. Knowledge about how these ranges are linked by movements of individuals from different populations is crucial for unravelling temporal variability in population spatial structuring and for identifying environmental drivers of population dynamics acting at different spatio‐temporal scales. We performed a large‐scale individual‐based migration tracking study of an Afro‐Palaearctic migratory raptor, to determine the patterns of migratory connectivity of European breeding populations. Location: Europe, Africa. Methods: Migration data were recorded using different devices (geolocators, satellite transmitters, Global Positioning System dataloggers) from 87 individuals breeding in the three core European populations, located in the Iberian, Italian and Balkan peninsulas. We estimated connectivity by the Mantel correlation coefficient (rM), and computed both the degree of separation between the non‐breeding areas of individuals from the same population (i.e. the population spread) and the relative size of the non‐breeding range (i.e. the non‐breeding range spread). Results: European lesser kestrels migrated on a broad front across the Mediterranean Sea and Sahara Desert, with different populations using different routes. Iberian birds migrated to western Sahel (Senegal, Mauritania, western Mali), Balkan birds migrated chiefly to central‐eastern Sahel (Niger, Nigeria, Chad), whereas Italian ones spread from eastern Mali to Nigeria. Spatial differentiation of non‐breeding areas led to a strong migratory connectivity (rM = .58), associated with a relatively high population (637 km) and non‐breeding range (1,149 km) spread. Main conclusions: Our comprehensive analysis of the non‐breeding distribution of European lesser kestrel populations revealed a strong migratory connectivity, a rare occurrence in long‐distance avian migrants. The geographical conformation of the species’ breeding and non‐breeding ranges, together with broad‐front migration across ecological barriers, promoted the differentiation of migratory routes and non‐breeding areas. Strong connectivity could then arise because of both high population spread and broad non‐breeding range. CLH; FCC Energía/Enerstar Villena S.A.; Alcalá de Henares Municipality; EDF Énergies Nouvelles S.A.; EuroNatur; Fundación Iberdrola España, Grant/Award Number: Project Migra; MAVA Foundation; French Ministry of Ecology, Grant/Award Number: Lesser Kestrel National Action Plan; Greek Green Fund; European Commission, Grant/Award Number: LIFE11 NAT/IT/000068, LIFE11 NAT/BG/000360 and NAT/GR/001011; Córdoba Zoo; Seiit‐R‐4; Consejería de Agricultura, Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Rural de Castilla‐La Mancha; MIUR, Grant/Award Number: PRIN 2010‐2011/20180‐TZKHC.

The aim of this study was to test the effectiveness of crustaceans in the identification of different pond types, including ‘Mediterranean Temporary Ponds’ (sensu ‘Habitats’ Directive) and ponds characterised by a range of hydroperiods. Thus, we performed a limnological study in the Alta Murgia National Park (central Apulia), conducting a three-year monitoring programme in 19 ponds, both temporary and permanent. Occurrence data for macrophytes and quantitative samples of crustaceans were collected contemporaneously with measures of water variables and environmental features. Based on macrophyte assessment, half of the studied waterbodies were found to include Mediterranean Temporary Pond priority habitats, and the possible relationships with the crustacean assemblages were analysed. All ponds were grouped into three different classes depending on their hydroperiod. Data analysis revealed that (i) there was a significant relationship between the distribution of crustaceans and macrophytes; (ii) crustacean richness was highest in ponds belonging to the shortest hydroperiod class considered and (iii) the different hydroperiod classes were associated with specific crustacean assemblages. This study indicates that crustaceans—in addition to macrophytes—can be used as an effective tool for the identification of different pond types.

The aim of this study was to test the effectiveness of crustaceans in the identification of different pond types, including ‘Mediterranean Temporary Ponds’ (sensu ‘Habitats’ Directive) and ponds characterised by a range of hydroperiods. Thus, we performed a limnological study in the Alta Murgia National Park (central Apulia), conducting a three-year monitoring programme in 19 ponds, both temporary and permanent. Occurrence data for macrophytes and quantitative samples of crustaceans were collected contemporaneously with measures of water variables and environmental features. Based on macrophyte assessment, half of the studied waterbodies were found to include Mediterranean Temporary Pond priority habitats, and the possible relationships with the crustacean assemblages were analysed. All ponds were grouped into three different classes depending on their hydroperiod. Data analysis revealed that (i) there was a significant relationship between the distribution of crustaceans and macrophytes; (ii) crustacean richness was highest in ponds belonging to the shortest hydroperiod class considered and (iii) the different hydroperiod classes were associated with specific crustacean assemblages. This study indicates that crustaceans—in addition to macrophytes—can be used as an effective tool for the identification of different pond types.

Animals compete for resources, and one way to ensure access to resources is by excluding competitors from the area containing the resources. Advances in tracking technology make it possible to quantify the overlap in home ranges between individuals and between populations. We present the first evidence of space partitioning between the two main Lesser Kestrel Falco naumanni colonies with the highest numbers of individuals in Italy, and with the highest densities of Lesser Kestrels in inhabited areas in their Eurasian breeding range. Using GPS data loggers, we collected 41,126 GPS points of Lesser Kestrels from both colonies during the nestling period. Home range overlap between the two colonies was almost zero at both 100%- and 99%-isopleths, and zero at 95%- and 90%-isopleths. Using a randomization procedure, we could show that home ranges were more spatially-segregated than expected by chance. We did detect increased overlap in home ranges among individuals within colonies. Although our results require further confirmation, they suggest that competition for food between colonies is weaker due to this strategy of spatial segregation of foraging areas. Our study confirms the recent notion that between-colony areal segregation may be the norm in colonial central-place foragers.