Search

BackgroundTransmission of resistance mutations to integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) in HIV-infected patients may compromise the efficacy of first-line antiretroviral regimens currently recommended worldwide. Continued surveillance of transmitted drug resistance (TDR) is thus warranted.ObjectivesWe evaluated the rates and effects on virological outcomes of TDR in a 96 week prospective multicentre cohort study of ART-naive HIV-1-infected subjects initiating INSTI-based ART in Spain between April 2015 and December 2016.MethodsPre-ART plasma samples were genotyped for integrase, protease and reverse transcriptase resistance using Sanger population sequencing or MiSeq™ using a ≥ 20% mutant sensitivity cut-off. Those present at 1%–19% of the virus population were considered to be low-frequency variants.ResultsFrom a total of 214 available samples, 173 (80.8%), 210 (98.1%) and 214 (100.0%) were successfully amplified for integrase, reverse transcriptase and protease genes, respectively. Using a Sanger-like cut-off, the overall prevalence of any TDR, INSTI-, NRTI-, NNRTI- and protease inhibitor (PI)-associated mutations was 13.1%, 1.7%, 3.8%, 7.1% and 0.9%, respectively. Only three (1.7%) subjects had INSTI TDR (R263K, E138K and G163R), while minority variants with integrase TDR were detected in 9.6% of subjects. There were no virological failures during 96 weeks of follow-up in subjects harbouring TDR as majority variants.ConclusionsTransmitted INSTI resistance remains rare in Spain and, to date, is not associated with virological failure to first-line INSTI-based regimens.

To understand the determinants of long-term immune responses to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the concurrent impact of vaccination and emerging variants, we follow a prospective cohort of 332 patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) over more than a year after symptom onset. We evaluate plasma-neutralizing activity using HIV-based pseudoviruses expressing the spike of different SARS-CoV-2 variants and analyze them longitudinally using mixed-effects models. Long-term neutralizing activity is stable beyond 1 year after infection in mild/asymptomatic and hospitalized participants. However, longitudinal models suggest that hospitalized individuals generate both short- and long-lived memory B cells, while the responses of non-hospitalized individuals are dominated by long-lived B cells. In both groups, vaccination boosts responses to natural infection. Long-term (>300 days from infection) responses in unvaccinated participants show a reduced efficacy against beta, but not alpha nor delta, variants. Multivariate analysis identifies the severity of primary infection as an independent determinant of higher magnitude and lower relative cross-neutralization activity of long-term neutralizing responses., Graphical abstract, Pradenas and Trinité et al. analyze the kinetics of neutralizing antibodies in response to natural SARS-CoV-2 infection and evaluate the long-term (beyond 1 year) stability and breadth of the neutralizing response before subsequent vaccination.

Current diagnostics of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection heavily rely on reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or on rapid antigen detection tests. The former suffers from long time-to-result and high cost while the latter from poor sensitivity. Therefore, it is crucial to develop rapid, sensitive, robust, and inexpensive methods for SARS-CoV-2 testing. Herein, we report a novel optofluidic technology, a flow-virometry reader (FVR), for fast and reliable SARS-CoV-2 detection in saliva samples. A small microfluidic chip together with a laser-pumped optical head detects the presence of viruses tagged with fluorescent antibodies directly from saliva samples. The technology has been validated using clinical samples with high sensitivity (91.2%) and specificity (90%). Thanks also to its short time-to-result (

BackgroundSARS-CoV-2 vaccination is the most effective strategy to protect elders living in long-term care facilities (LTCF) against severe COVID-19, but primary vaccine responses are less effective in older adults. Here, we characterized the humoral responses following 3 months after mRNA/BNT162b2 vaccine in institutionalized elders.MethodsPlasma levels of specific SARS-CoV-2 total IgG, IgM and IgA antibodies were measured before and 3 months after vaccination in elders living in LTCF. Neutralization capacity was assessed in a pseudovirus neutralization assay against WH1 (original) and B.1.617.2/Delta variants. A group of younger adults was used as reference group.ResultsThree months after vaccination, uninfected-elders presented reduced specific SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels and significantly lower neutralization capacity against the WH1 and Delta virus compared to vaccinated uninfected younger individuals. In contrast, COVID-19 recovered elders showed significantly higher specific SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels after vaccination than younger counterparts, while showing similar neutralization activity against WH1 virus and increased neutralization capacity against Delta variant. Despite previously infected elders elicit potent cross-reactive immune responses similarly to younger individuals, higher quantities of specific SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies are required to reach the same neutralization levels.ConclusionsWhile hybrid immunity seems to be active in previously infected elders after three months from mRNA/BNT162b2 vaccination, humoral immune responses are diminished in COVID-19 uninfected vaccinated residents living in LTCF. These results suggests that a vaccine booster dose should be prioritized for this particularly vulnerable population.Word summaryWhile previously infected and vaccinated elders living in LTCF had comparable neutralizing antibody levels to younger individuals, vaccinated uninfected-residents showed limited neutralization capacity against both original and delta variants. Hybrid immunity seems to be active in elders and can be relevant to design vaccine boosting campaigns.

The role of T cells in the control of SARS-CoV-2 infection has been underestimated in favor of neutralizing antibodies. However, cellular immunity is essential for long-term viral control and protection from disease severity. To understand T-cell immunity in the absence of antibody generation we focused on a group of SARS-CoV-2 Non-Seroconvertors (NSC) recovered from infection. We performed an immune comparative analysis of SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals stratified by the absence or presence of seroconversion and disease severity. We report high levels of total naïve and low effector CD8+ T cells in NSC. Moreover, reduced levels of T-cell activation monitored by PD-1 and activation-induced markers were observed in the context of functional SARS-CoV-2 T-cell responses. Longitudinal data indicate the stability of the NSC phenotype over three months of follow-up after infection. Together, these data characterized distinctive immunological traits in NSC including skewed cellular distribution, low activation and functional SARS-CoV-2 T-cell responses. This data highlights the value of T-cell immune monitoring in populations with low seroconversion rates in response to SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination.

BackgroundUnderstanding the determinants of long-term immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 and the concurrent impact of vaccination and emerging variants of concern will guide optimal strategies to achieve global protection against the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsA prospective cohort of 332 COVID-19 patients was followed beyond one year. Plasma neutralizing activity was evaluated using HIV-based reporter pseudoviruses expressing different SARS-CoV-2 spikes and was longitudinally analyzed using mixed-effects models.FindingsLong-term neutralizing activity was stable beyond one year after infection in mild/asymptomatic and hospitalized participants. However, longitudinal models suggest that hospitalized individuals generate both short- and long-lived memory B cells, while outpatient responses were dominated by long-lived B cells. In both groups, vaccination boosted responses to natural infection, although viral variants, mainly B.1.351, reduced the efficacy of neutralization. Importantly, despite showing higher neutralization titers, hospitalized patients showed lower cross-neutralization of B.1.351 variant compared to outpatients. Multivariate analysis identified severity of primary infection as the factor that independently determines both the magnitude and the inferior cross-neutralization activity of long-term neutralizing responses.ConclusionsNeutralizing response induced by SARS-CoV-2 is heterogeneous in magnitude but stable beyond one year after infection. Vaccination boosts these long-lasting natural neutralizing responses, counteracting the significant resistance to neutralization of new viral variants. Severity of primary infection determines higher magnitude but poorer quality of long-term neutralizing responses.

SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is the most effective strategy to protect individuals with haematologic malignancies against severe COVID-19, while eliciting limited vaccine responses. We characterized the humoral responses following 3 mo after mRNA-based vaccines in individuals at different plasma-cell disease stages: monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), and multiple myeloma on first-line therapy (MM), compared with a healthy population. Plasma samples from uninfected MM patients showed lower SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody levels and neutralization capacity compared with MGUS, SMM, and healthy individuals. Importantly, COVID-19 recovered MM individuals presented significantly higher plasma neutralization capacity compared with their uninfected counterparts, highlighting that hybrid immunity elicit stronger immunity even in this immunocompromised population. No differences in the vaccine-induced humoral responses were observed between uninfected MGUS, SMM and healthy individuals. In conclusion, MGUS and SMM patients could be SARS-CoV-2 vaccinated following the vaccine recommendations for the general population, whereas a tailored monitoring of the vaccine-induced immune responses should be considered in uninfected MM patients. This work was partially funded by Grifols, the Departament de Salut of the Generalitat de Catalunya (grant DSL0016 to J Blanco and Grant DSL015 to J Carrillo), the Spanish Health Institute Carlos III (Grant PI17/01518 and PI20/00093 to J Blanco and PI18/01332 to J Carrillo), Fundació Gloria Soler, and the crowdfunding initiatives https://www.yomecorono.com, BonPreu/Esclat and Correos. M Trigueros was supported by a doctoral fellowship from the Departament de Salut from Generalitat de Catalunya (SLT017/20/000095). F Muñoz-Lopez is supported by a doctoral grant from Sorigué Foundation. E Pradenas was supported by a doctoral grant from ANID, Chile: Grant 72180406. M Massanella was granted with RYC2020-028934-I/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 from Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation and State Research Agency, MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and the European Social Fund “investing in your future.”

The role of T cells in the control of SARS-CoV-2 infection has been underestimated in favor of neutralizing antibodies. However, cellular immunity is essential for long-term viral control and protection from disease severity. To understand T-cell immunity in the absence of antibody generation we focused on a group of SARS-CoV-2 Non-Seroconvertors (NSC) recovered from infection. We performed an immune comparative analysis of SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals stratified by the absence or presence of seroconversion and disease severity. We report high levels of total naïve and low effector CD8+ T cells in NSC. Moreover, polyfunctional Nucleocapsid (NP)-specific CD8+ T-cell responses, as well as reduced levels of T-cell activation monitored by PD-1 and activation-induced markers, were distinctive immunological traits in NSC. Longitudinal data support the stability of the NSC phenotype over three months. Our results implicate highly functional SARS-CoV-2 Spike and NP T-cell responses with low immune activation in protection from disease severity in the absence of seroconversion.SUMMARYTo understand SARS-CoV-2 specific T-cell immunity in the absence of seroconversion, we characterized immunological features of Non-Seroconvertors recovered from infection. Highly functional specific T-cell responses and low immune activation were determinants of immune protection from severe disease.

To assess the potential impact of predominant circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants on neutralizing activity of infected and/or vaccinated individuals, we analyzed neutralization of pseudoviruses expressing the spike of the original Wuhan strain, the D614G and B.1.1.7 variants. Our data show that parameters of natural infection (time from infection and infecting variant) determined cross-neutralization. Importantly, upon vaccination, previously infected individuals developed equivalent B.1.1.7 and Wuhan neutralizing responses. In contrast, uninfected vaccinees showed reduced neutralization against B.1.1.7.FundingThis study was funded by Grifols, the Departament de Salut of the Generalitat de Catalunya, the Spanish Health Institute Carlos III, CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya, and the crowdfunding initiatives #joemcorono, BonPreu/Esclat and Correos.

Background Understanding mid-term kinetics of immunity to SARS-CoV-2 is the cornerstone for public health control of the pandemic and vaccine development. However, current evidence is rather based on limited measurements, losing sight of the temporal pattern of these changes. Methods We conducted a longitudinal analysis on a prospective cohort of COVID-19 patients followed up for >6 months. Neutralizing activity was evaluated using HIV reporter pseudoviruses expressing SARS-CoV-2 S protein. IgG antibody titer was evaluated by ELISA against the S2 subunit, the receptor binding domain (RBD), and the nucleoprotein (NP). Statistical analyses were carried out using mixed-effects models. Findings We found that individuals with mild or asymptomatic infection experienced an insignificant decay in neutralizing activity, which persisted 6 months after symptom onset or diagnosis. Hospitalized individuals showed higher neutralizing titers, which decreased following a 2-phase pattern, with an initial rapid decline that significantly slowed after day 80. Despite this initial decay, neutralizing activity at 6 months remained higher among hospitalized individuals compared to mild symptomatic. The slow decline in neutralizing activity at mid-term contrasted with the steep slope of anti-RBD, S2, or NP antibody titers, all of them showing a constant decline over the follow-up period. Conclusions Our results reinforce the hypothesis that the quality of the neutralizing immune response against SARS-CoV-2 evolves over the post-convalescent stage. Funding This study was funded by 10.13039/501100016387Grifols, the Departament de Salut of the Generalitat de Catalunya (grant nos. SLD016 to J.B. and SLD015 to J.C.), the Spanish Health Institute Carlos III (grant nos. PI17/01518 and PI18/01332 to J.C.), CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya2017 SGR 252, and the crowdfunding initiatives #joemcorono, BonPreu/Esclat, and Correos. The funders had no role in the study design, the data collection and analysis, the decision to publish, or the preparation of the manuscript. E.P. was supported by a doctoral grant from the National Agency for Research and Development of Chile (ANID; 72180406). C.A.-N. was supported by a doctoral grant from Generalitat de Catalunya and Fons Social Europeu (FI). S.P.-Y. was supported by 10.13039/501100011850Fundación Canaria Doctor Manuel Morales and 10.13039/100015528Universidad de La Laguna., Graphical Abstract, Context and significance Assessing the durability of neutralizing responses against SARS-CoV-2 is crucial to predict the level of protection in post-convalescent COVID-19 patients. We monitored for >6 months a cohort of 210 SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals with a wide range of symptoms (from asymptomatic infection to severe disease). Our results indicate that neutralizing antibodies are stable for at least 6 months after infection. However, individuals with mild or asymptomatic infection developed lower titers of neutralizing antibodies and could be at higher risk of reinfection. Despite the maintenance of neutralizing antibodies, total antibody titers slowly but gradually declined over time without apparent stabilization. This observation requires further analysis to evaluate the potential role of viral persistence or viral re-exposure in maintaining neutralization titers., Pradenas et al. describe the kinetics of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and demonstrate their association with clinical severity and their stability for at least 6 months, despite constant decay of IgG titers. These findings help us to understand the mid-term immune response and the impact on herd immunity.

The protective effect of neutralizing antibodies in SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals is not yet well defined. To address this issue, we have analyzed the kinetics of neutralizing antibody responses and their association with disease severity. Between March and May 2020, the prospective KING study enrolled 72 COVID-19+ participants grouped according to disease severity. SARS-CoV-2 infection was diagnosed by serological and virological tests. Plasma neutralizing responses were assessed against replicative virus and pseudoviral particles. Multiple regression and non-parametric tests were used to analyze dependence of parameters. The magnitude of neutralizing titers significantly increased with disease severity. Hospitalized individuals developed higher titers compared to mild-symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals, which together showed titers below the detection limit in 50% of cases. Longitudinal analysis confirmed the strong differences in neutralizing titers between non-hospitalized and hospitalized participants and showed rapid kinetics of appearance of neutralizing antibodies (50% and 80% of maximal activity reached after 11 and 17 days after symptoms onset, respectively) in hospitalized patients. No significant impact of age, gender or treatment on the neutralizing titers was observed in this limited cohort. These data identify a clear association of humoral immunity with disease severity and point to immune mechanisms other than antibodies as relevant players in COVID-19 protection. This work was partially funded by Grifols, the Departament de Salut of the Generalitat de Catalunya (Grant DSL0016 to JB and Grant DSL015 to JC), the Spanish Health Institute Carlos III (Grant PI17/01518 and PI18/01332 to JC) and the crowdfunding initiatives #joemcorono, BonPreu/Esclat and Correos. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, the decision to publish, or the preparation of the manuscript. EP was supported by a doctoral grant from National Agency for Research and Development (ANID)—Formation of Advanced Human Capital Program, Becas Chile: Grant 72180406. We are deeply grateful to all participant and to the technical staff of IrsiCaixa for sample processing. We also thank Daniel Pérez-Zsolt and Jordana Muñoz-Basagoiti for assistance with ACE-2 expressing 293T cell culture. Peer Reviewed "Article signat per 26 autors/es: Benjamin Trinité, Ferran Tarrés-Freixas, Jordi Rodon, Edwards Pradenas, Víctor Urrea, Silvia Marfil, María Luisa Rodríguez de la Concepción, Carlos Ávila-Nieto, Carmen Aguilar-Gurrieri, Ana Barajas, Raquel Ortiz, Roger Paredes, Lourdes Mateu, Alfonso Valencia, Víctor Guallar, Lidia Ruiz, Eulàlia Grau, Marta Massanella, Jordi Puig, Anna Chamorro, Nuria Izquierdo-Useros, Joaquim Segalés, Bonaventura Clotet, Jorge Carrillo, Júlia Vergara-Alert & Julià Blanco"

Altres ajuts: This work was partially funded by Grifols, the Departament de Salut of the Generalitat de Catalunya (grant SLD016 to J.B. and Grant SLD015 to J.C.), and the crowdfunding initiatives #joemcorono, BonPreu/Esclat and Correos. With the spread of new variants of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), there is a need to assess the protection conferred by both previous infections and current vaccination. Here we tested the neutralizing activity of infected and/or vaccinated individuals against pseudoviruses expressing the spike of the original SARS-CoV-2 isolate Wuhan-Hu-1 (WH1), the D614G mutant and the B.1.1.7 variant. Our data show that parameters of natural infection (time from infection and nature of the infecting variant) determined cross-neutralization. Uninfected vaccinees showed a small reduction in neutralization against the B.1.1.7 variant compared to both the WH1 strain and the D614G mutant. Interestingly, upon vaccination, previously infected individuals developed more robust neutralizing responses against B.1.1.7, suggesting that vaccines can boost the neutralization breadth conferred by natural infection.

Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTI) are a main component of the current antiretroviral regimens recommended for treatment of HIV infection. However, little is known about the impact of INSTI on neurocognition and neuroimaging. We developed a prospective observational trial to evaluate the effects of INSTI-based antiretroviral therapy on comprehensive brain outcomes (cognitive, functional, and imaging) according to the time since HIV-1 acquisition. We recruited men living with HIV who initiated antiretroviral therapy with INSTI < 3 months since the estimated date of HIV-1 acquisition (n = 12) and > 6 months since estimated date of HIV-1 acquisition (n = 15). We also recruited a group of matched seronegative individuals (n = 15). Assessments were performed at baseline (before initiation of therapy in HIV arms) and at weeks 4 and 48. Baseline cognitive functioning was comparable between the arms. At week 48, we did not find cognitive differences between starting therapy with INSTI earlier than 3 months or later than 6 months after acquisition of HIV-1 infection. Functional status was poorer in individuals diagnosed earlier. This effect recovered 48 weeks after initiation of therapy. Regarding brain imaging, we found that men living with HIV initiating antiretroviral therapy later experienced a greater decrease in medial orbitofrontal cortex over time, with expected negative repercussions for decision-making tasks. The study was supported by Fundació Lluita Contra la SIDA (FLS-ANT 2015-01). IMZ was supported by a P-FIS grant (FI17/00294) and CSM by a Miguel Servet contract (CPII16/00048) from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III. NPA was partially supported by grants MTM2015-64465-C2-1-R (MINECO/FEDER) and 2017 SGR 622 (GRBIO)

Understanding mid-term kinetics of immunity to SARS-CoV-2 is the cornerstone for public health control of the pandemic and vaccine development. However, current evidence is rather based on limited measurements, thus losing sight of the temporal pattern of these changes1–6. In this longitudinal analysis, conducted on a prospective cohort of COVID-19 patients followed up to 242 days, we found that individuals with mild or asymptomatic infection experienced an insignificant decay in neutralizing activity that persisted six months after symptom onset or diagnosis. Hospitalized individuals showed higher neutralizing titers, which decreased following a two-phase pattern, with an initial rapid decline that significantly slowed after day 80. Despite this initial decay, neutralizing activity at six months remained higher among hospitalized individuals. The slow decline in neutralizing activity at mid-term contrasted with the steep slope of antibody titers change, reinforcing the hypothesis that the quality of immune response evolves over the post-convalescent stage4,5.

Currently, Papanicolaou smears are proposed at three-year intervals for cervical screening to all women living with HIV. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to provide data on the incidence of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) in cervical smear confirmed by histology in HIV-1-infected women (two consecutive normal Papanicolaou smears at baseline) after a long-term follow-up. Sixty-seven women (recruited between March 1999 and January 2003) were analyzed. The median period of follow-up was 13.2 years (range: 7.4–17.1 years) with a total of 583 Papanicolaou smears. Twenty-seven percent of these HIV-1-infected women had poorly-controlled HIV. Cumulative incidence of HSIL was 18% (12/67; 95%CI: 11–29%) of which one was an invasive squamous cell carcinoma and two were carcinoma in situ. These women had not been well-engaged with the annual Papanicolaou smear screening program and had poor adherence to antiretroviral therapy. Development of HSIL was associated with high-risk-HPV infection (OR: 14.9; 95%CI: 3.0, 75.1). At last Papanicolaou smear, prevalence of high-risk-HPV infection was 30% (20/66, 95%CI: 21–42%). In conclusion, the incidence of cervical HSIL in HIV-1-infected women with poor antiretroviral therapy adherence or poor immunological status reinforces the need to identify those HIV-1-infected women at risk of developing cervical cancer.