1. Effectiveness of bedside investigations to diagnose peripheral artery disease among people with diabetes mellitus: A systematic review
- Author
-
Chuter, Vivienne, Schaper, Nicolaas, Mills, Joseph, Hinchliffe, Robert, Russell, David, Azuma, Nobuyoshi, Behrendt, Christian‐Alexander, Boyko, Edward J, Conte, Michael S, Humphries, Misty, Kirksey, Lee, McGinigle, Katharine C, Nikol, Sigrid, Nordanstig, Joakim, Rowe, Vincent, van den Berg, Jos C, Venermo, Maarit, and Fitridge, Robert
- Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences ,Clinical Sciences ,Diabetes ,Cardiovascular ,Clinical Research ,4.2 Evaluation of markers and technologies ,Humans ,Ankle Brachial Index ,Diabetes Mellitus ,Diabetic Angiopathies ,Diabetic Foot ,Peripheral Arterial Disease ,Point-of-Care Testing ,Prognosis ,Reproducibility of Results ,amputation ,diabetes ,diagnosis ,foot ulcer ,peripheral artery disease ,reliability ,Endocrinology & Metabolism ,Clinical sciences - Abstract
As a progressive disease process, early diagnosis and ongoing monitoring and treatment of lower limb peripheral artery disease (PAD) is critical to reduce the risk of diabetes-related foot ulcer (DFU) development, non-healing of wounds, infection and amputation, in addition to cardiovascular complications. There are a variety of non-invasive tests available to diagnose PAD at the bedside, but there is no consensus as to the most diagnostically accurate of these bedside investigations or their reliability for use as a method of ongoing monitoring. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to first determine the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive bedside tests for identifying PAD compared to an imaging reference test and second to determine the intra- and inter-rater reliability of non-invasive bedside tests in adults with diabetes. A database search of Medline and Embase was conducted from 1980 to 30 November 2022. Prospective and retrospective investigations of the diagnostic accuracy of bedside testing in people with diabetes using an imaging reference standard and reliability studies of bedside testing techniques conducted in people with diabetes were eligible. Included studies of diagnostic accuracy were required to report adequate data to calculate the positive likelihood ratio (PLR) and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) which were the primary endpoints. The quality appraisal was conducted using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies and Quality Appraisal of Reliability quality appraisal tools. From a total of 8517 abstracts retrieved, 40 studies met the inclusion criteria for the diagnostic accuracy component of the review and seven studies met the inclusion criteria for the reliability component of the review. Most studies investigated the diagnostic accuracy of ankle -brachial index (ABI) (N = 38). In people with and without DFU, PLRs ranged from 1.69 to 19.9 and NLRs from 0.29 to 0.84 indicating an ABI 1.3, TBI of
- Published
- 2024