Search

This article aimed to assess the depth and volume of craniomaxillofacial (CMF) trauma exposure and education in otolaryngology residency training in the United States. This is a cross-sectional survey. A 15-question web-based survey was distributed to program directors of 106 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-approved otolaryngology residency programs to inquire about program size and demographics, trauma coverage, case volume, and education. Responses were collected anonymously. A total of 77 responses were received, representing 73% of residency programs. Seventy-five programs (97%) reported that their residents rotated at a level 1 trauma center, and 72 (94%) covered CMF trauma. Sixty-one programs (79%) included pediatric CMF trauma. The majority of programs (76%) allocated less than 10% of residency-dedicated didactic lecture time to CMF trauma. Residents in all programs typically logged at least 11 to 20 cases before graduation with 24% of programs averaging more than 50 cases per resident. Ninety percent of respondents described the training as “somewhat” to “very adequate.” CMF coverage by the otolaryngology department, number of cases, and dedicated didactic lecture time to CMF trauma were significant factors on the perception of adequate training. The majority of program directors felt that the training in CMF trauma was adequate. Reasons for this may include that most residents rotate at level 1 trauma centers, have exposure to pediatric trauma, encounter an adequate volume of cases, and have dedicated didactic time to CMF education.

Patients frequently access online resources for medical information. The National Institutes of Health and the American Medical Association recommend that to be understood by the average American, patient information should be presented at or below the sixth to seventh academic grade level. The popularity of rhytidectomy (facelift) is rising, and providers are frequently using the Internet to attract patients. All rhytidectomy information provided by 100 private practice Web sites in New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston, and Phoenix was analyzed using Readable.io software. The information was also assessed using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Gunning-Fog Index, Coleman-Liau Index, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, Automated Readability Index, Flesch Reading Ease Score, and Fry Reading Graph tools. Analyzed material was written at a higher academic grade level than recommended for the average American. The overall average grade level was 10.99 ± 1.39. Online patient education materials about rhytidectomy provided by private practice clinics in 5 major cities of the United States were written at academic grade levels above the National Institutes of Health and American Medical Association recommended levels. This may lead to rhytidectomy patients having unrealistic or inaccurate expectations related to their surgical procedure.

Importance Upper lip avulsion after traumatic dog bite is a serious cause of facial disfigurement for which there is no consensus on management in the acute setting. Objective This review was prompted by a case at our institution and is intended to display the available evidence in the management of the patient after dog bite injury to the upper lip. Our main goals are to create a management algorithm using current evidence and to stimulate further clinical investigation to improve outcomes in patients with facial dog bite injuries. Evidence Review A review of English literature was performed using Pubmed/MEDLINE for case reports and case series of lip replantation using microvascular anastomosis. Additional review of hyperbaric oxygen therapy, medicinal leech therapy, lip reconstruction methods, and reapproximation was performed. Reference searches were performed for all retrieved articles. Findings Microvascular replantation is a successful method of acute management in dog bite injuries of the lip. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy and medicinal leech therapy improve outcomes. Immediate cross-lip flaps and immediate reapproximation are alternative techniques that can be performed in the acute setting, but further investigation is required. Conclusions The repair of the upper lip after a dog bite is a priority due to the functional and psychiatric sequelae associated with facial disfigurement. Microvascular replantation should be considered first-line. Immediate reapproximation without microvascular reanastomosis and immediate reconstruction may also be performed. A stepwise clinical algorithm may aid the surgeon in the acute management of dog bite trauma to the lip.

Edwin Williams. Rhinoplasty: Everything You Need to Know About Fixing and Reshaping Your Nose. North Charleston, SC: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2013. ISBN-10: 1480208892 Rhinoplasty is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures in the United States, according to statistics of the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery1 and the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2 as of 2012. Given the large number of patients requesting information on this procedure and the wealth of information available on the Internet, a guided manual for patients considering this procedure would offer substantial utility. Rhinoplasty: Everything You Need to Know About Fixing and Reshaping Your Nose is a text written for patients who are about to embark on, or are strongly considering, rhinoplasty. The author, Dr Edwin Williams, is an expert rhinoplasty surgeon and a renowned contributor to the field. He serves as Fellowship Director for the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, invited speaker at national meetings annually, and Clinical Professor of Surgery at Albany Medical Center in Albany, New York. The book itself is organized into 8 chapters, most of which are fewer than 5 pages long. Other chapters are longer (10-20 pages), depending on the subject matter. A lengthy section is dedicated to frequently asked questions (FAQs), and another chapter includes before-and-after …