Search

Ideal management of the node-negative neck in early oral cancers is a debated issue. Elective neck dissection (END) is recommended in these patients as it offers a survival benefit. However, about 50-70% of patients who do not harbor occult metastasis are overtreated with this approach. Surgery is associated with morbidity, predominantly shoulder dysfunction. Numerous attempts have been made to identify true node-negative patients through imaging and prediction models but none have high diagnostic accuracy to safely spare the neck dissection. The recent publications of 2 large randomized controlled trials comparing the outcomes of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) and END have spurred interest in SNB. Both the trials reported SNB to be an oncologically safe procedure and spared unnecessary neck dissections. The functional outcomes of the trials showed that SNB limits the morbidity compared to END, which albeit evens out at the end of one-year post-surgery. Despite its benefits, SNB has failed to gain widespread acceptability due to various limitations including the need for infrastructure, equipment costs, staff, and multidisciplinary collaboration of nuclear medicine, surgical, and pathology fraternity. The labor-intensive pathology protocol with serial step sectioning and immunohistochemistry poses a challenge to the feasibility at a high-volume center. This perspective discusses these limitations and propose plausible solutions to the conundrum. To make it widely applicable and feasible across the globe efforts should be directed to understand biology better, find novel solutions, and implement the lessons learned over decades from other sites.

COVID-19 pandemic has emerged as a global health emergency involving more than 200 countries so far. The number of affected population is on rising, so is the mortality. This crisis has overwhelmed the healthcare infrastructures in many affected countries. Due to overall rising cancer incidence and specific concerns, a cohort of cancer patients forms a distinct subset of the population in whom a correct and timely treatment has a huge impact on the outcome. During this period, oncology care is definitely affected owing to many factors like lockdowns, reduced beds and deferral of elective cases to halt the spread of the pandemic. Surgery remains the best line of defence in many solid organ tumours especially in early stage and is potentially curative. China, the source of this pandemic, has taken more than 3 months to enter the post transitional phase of this pandemic. Deferring cancer surgeries for this long period may have a direct impact on the long-term outcomes of cancer patients. Many surgical oncology associations across the globe have come up with triage guidelines for surgical care of cancer patients; however, these are based on expert opinion rather than actual data. Herein, we intend to review these guidelines with respect to the risk of disease progression in cancer patients. In the absence of actual data on cancer surgery care during this pandemic, clinical decisions should be based on careful consideration of disease-related and patient-related factors. While some of the cancer surgeries can be safely delayed for some time, how long we can delay surgeries safely cannot be answered/ explained by any means. Thorough evaluation and discussion by an expert and experienced multidisciplinary team appears to be the most effective way forward.

// Vanita Noronha 1 , * , Vijay Maruti Patil 1 , * , Amit Joshi 1 , Manoj Mahimkar 2 , Usha Patel 2 , Manish Kumar Pandey 2 , Arun Chandrasekharan 1 , Hollis Dsouza 1 , Atanu Bhattacharjee 3 , Abhishek Mahajan 1 , Nilesh Sabale 1 , Jai Prakash Agarwal 4 , Sarbani Ghosh-Laskar 4 , Ashwini Budrukkar 4 , Anil K. D’Cruz 5 , Pankaj Chaturvedi 5 , Prathamesh S. Pai 5 , Devendra Chaukar 5 , Sudhir Nair 5 , Shivakumar Thiagarajan 5 , Shripad Banavali 1 and Kumar Prabhash 1 1 Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, HBNI, Mumbai, India 2 Mahimkar Laboratory, Cancer Research Institute (CRI), Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre (TMC), HBNI, Navi Mumbai, India 3 Section of Biostatistics, Department of Epidemiology, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Navi Mumbai, India 4 Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, HBNI, Mumbai, India 5 Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, HBNI, Mumbai, India * These authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence to: Kumar Prabhash, email: kumarprabhashtmh@gmail.com Keywords: HPV negative; oropharynx; nimotuzumab; weekly; cisplatin Received: September 03, 2019 Accepted: December 21, 2019 Published: January 28, 2020 ABSTRACT Background: Addition of nimotuzumab to weekly cisplatin and radiation improves outcomes in head and neck cancer. HPV negative oropharyngeal cancer has unsatisfactory treatment outcomes and is a candidate for escalation of treatment. We wanted to determine whether the addition of nimotuzumab to cisplatin-radiation could improve outcomes in these poor-risk tumors. Methods: This was a subgroup analysis of a phase 3 randomized study. In this study, locally advanced head and neck cancer patients undergoing definitive chemoradiation were randomly allocated to weekly cisplatin (30 mg/m2 IV)- radiation (66–70 Gy) {CRT arm} or nimotuzumab (200 mg weekly) -weekly cisplatin (30 mg/m2)-radiation (66–70 Gy) {NCRT arm}. The data of HPV negative oropharyngeal cancer was extracted from the database of this study for the analysis. HPV testing was done with p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining and reported according to the CAP criteria. The outcomes assessed were progression-free survival (PFS), disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional control, and overall survival (OS). Interaction test was performed between the study arms and HPV status prior to doing any HPV specific analysis for each of the studied outcomes. Kaplan Meier estimates for 2 year OS with 95%CI was calculated. The hazard ratio was obtained using COX regression analysis. Results: We had 187 HPV negative oropharyngeal cancers, 91 in the CRT arm and 96 in NCRT arm. The interaction test was significant for PFS ( p = 0.000), locoregional control ( p = 0.007) and overall survival ( p = 0.002) but not for DFS ( p = 0.072). The 2- year PFS was 31.5% (95%CI 21.5–42) in CRT arm versus 57.2% (95%CI 45.8–67.1) in NCRT arm (HR -0.54; 95%CI 0.36–0.79, p = 0.002). The 2-year LRC was 41.4% (95%CI 29.8–52.6) in the CRT arm versus in 60.4% (95%CI 48.7–70.2) in the NCRT arm (HR -0.61; 95%CI 0.4–0.94, p = 0.024). The addition of nimotuzumab also lead to an improvement in 2-year OS from 39.0% (95%CI 28.4–49.6) to 57.6% (95%CI 46.3–67.4) (HR-0.63, 95%CI 0.43–0.92, p = 0.018). Conclusions: The addition of nimotuzumab to weekly cisplatin-radiation improves outcomes inclusive of OS in HPV negative oropharyngeal cancers.

Background: Sinonasal tumors are a rare group of neoplasms with limited data available regarding their treatment. Objectives: To estimate the 5 year outcomes and late adverse events of locally advanced sinonasal tumors treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NACT) followed by local therapy. Methods: Twenty-five patients with locally advanced esthesioneuroblastoma or sinonasal neuroendocrine tumors treated between August 2010 and August 2014 with NACT followed by local therapy were selected. The 5-year outcome and late adverse events (CTCAE version 4.02) were noted. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. COX regression analysis was used to identify factors impacting PFS and OS. Results: The median follow-up was 5.15 years. The 5-year PFS in the esthesioneuroblastoma cohort and in the sinonasal neuroendocrine carcinoma (SNEC) cohort was 63.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 28.9–84.7) and 34.6% (95% CI: 10.1–61.1), respectively (P = 0.1). The only factor impacting PFS on multivariate analysis was a response to NACT (P = 0.033). The 5-year OS in the esthesioneuroblastoma cohort and in the SNEC cohort was 91.7% (95% CI: 53.9–98.9) and 46.2% (95% CI: 19.2–69.6), respectively (P = 0.024). Any grade late adverse events were seen in 20 patients (80%). Metabolic late adverse events were seen in 19 patients (76%). Conclusion: NACT in advanced sinonasal cancers is associated with an improvement in 5-year outcomes. However, late side effects, especially metabolic, are seen in these patients and should be evaluated during follow-up.

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is highly prevalent in south and southeast Asia. Many (30-50%) OSCC patients develop lymph node metastasis (LNM), which is the most important prognostic factor in OSCC. To identify genomic correlates of LNM, we compared exome sequences and copy number variation data of blood and tumor DNA from highly contrasting subgroups of patients to reduce false inferences-(i) patients with LNM and (ii) patients with late stage disease but without LNM. We found that LNM is associated with (i) specific hotspot somatic mutations in TP53 and CASP8; (ii) rare nonsilent germline mutations in BRCA2 and FAT1; (iii) mutations in mito-G2/M and nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) pathways; (iv) recurrent deletion of genes for DNA repair by homologous recombination; and (v) chromosomal instability. LN+ patients with NHEJ pathway mutations have longer disease-free survival. Five genomic features have a high predictive value of LNM.

Endometriosis is the presence of normal endometrial glands and stroma outside the endometrium, seen in women in the reproductive age group. Endometriosis is common in the pelvis in the pouch of Douglas, rectum, urinary bladder, and uterosacral ligaments. Although extrapelvic endometriosis is uncommon, endometriosis at extrapelvic sites such as the gastrointestinal tract, urinary tract, lung, skin, brain, and scar site has been reported and can mimic other benign and malignant lesions. It is a difficult diagnosis when patients have a preexisting neoplasm as metastasis can be a differential. The clinical history, imaging features, and a strong suspicion of this entity in the reproductive age group help accurate diagnosis of this entity. We present a rare case of deep pelvic (periureteral) endometriosis in a 41-year-old woman with history of papillary carcinoma of the thyroid gland causing diagnostic dilemma on imaging and histopathology and also discuss briefly the imaging findings of endometriosis.

BackgroundThere is controversy regarding management of the neck at salvage laryngectomy. The aim of this study was to perform an analysis to determine the incidence of occult node positivity in this group and analyse factors affecting it.MethodA retrospective analysis of 171 patients who underwent salvage total laryngectomy between 2000 and 2015 for recurrent or residual disease following definitive non-surgical treatment and were clinico-radiologically node negative at the time salvage laryngectomy was carried out.ResultsA total of 171 patients with laryngeal or hypopharyngeal cancers underwent concurrent neck dissection at laryngectomy. There were 162 patients (94.7 per cent) who underwent bilateral neck dissection, and 9 patients (5.3 per cent) who underwent ipsilateral neck dissection. The occult lateral nodal metastasis rate was 10.5 per cent. Of various factors, initial node positive disease was the only factor predicting occult metastasis on univariable and multivariable analysis (p = 0.001).ConclusionRisk of occult metastasis is high in patients who have node positive disease before starting radiotherapy. This group should be offered elective neck dissection.

Objectives Tracheostomy (TT) and delayed extubation (DE) are two approaches to postoperative airway management in patients after major oral cancer surgery. We planned a study to determine the safety of overnight intubation followed by extubation the next morning (DE) compared to elective TT and to identify factors that were associated with a safe DE (maintenance of a patent airway). Material and methods We conducted a prospective observational study in a tertiary referral cancer care center. We included adult patients undergoing elective major oral cancer surgery under general anesthesia with tracheal intubation. The decision regarding postoperative airway management using either TT or DE was made according to the usual practice at our center. Results We screened a total of 4477 patients, 720 patients were included. DE was performed in 417 patients (58.4%) and TT in 303 patients (42.4%). On multivariable analysis, T1-T2 tumor stage, absence of extensive resection, primary closure or reconstruction using fasciocutaneous flap, absence of preoperative radiation, no neck dissection or unilateral neck dissection and shorter duration of anesthesia were independent predictors for a safe DE. Overall complications (4.3% versus 22.5%, p = 0.00) and airway complications (1.7% versus 8.7%, p = 0.00) were lower in the DE compared to the TT group respectively. DE was associated with a shorter hospital stay (7.2 ± 3.7 versus 11.5 ± 7.2 days, p = 0.00), time to oral intake and speech compared to TT. Conclusions A DE strategy after major oral cancer surgery is a safe alternative to TT in a select group of patients.

Background Parathyroid carcinoma (PC) requires preoperative prediction for appropriate surgical management. Differentiation from symptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism (sPHPT) cohort is difficult. Methods Patients with sPHPT from a tertiary-care center, Western India, including Cohort-A (n = 19 [10/M; 9/F]) with PC and Cohort-B (n = 93 [33/M; 60/F] with benign parathyroid lesions) were compared to derive predictors for differential diagnosis. Results There were no differences in clinical or biochemical parameters between the two cohorts. Comparison of CECT parameters showed that irregular shape, tumor heterogeneity, infiltration, short/long-axis ratio >0.76, and long-diameter >30 mm had high negative-predictive value and intratumoral calcification had 100% positive-predictive value to diagnose PC; whereas there were no differences in contrast-enhancement patterns. Long diameter, short/long-axis ratio, and heterogeneity were significant predictors on multivariate analysis. Conclusion It is difficult to predict diagnosis of PC in an Indian sPHPT cohort based on clinical and biochemical parameters, whereas CECT parathyroid-based parameters can aid in diagnosis.

6058 Background: Depth of invasion (DOI) has been incorporated in the new AJCC TNM staging (8th edition) for oral cancers. We hypothesized that the negative effect of increasing DOI on outcomes was a result of an increased propensity to node metastasis and appropriate neck treatment would negate its detrimental effect on outcomes. Methods: Patients with T1/ T2 oral squamous cell carcinoma, clinically node negative, from a previously reported Randomized Controlled Trial (NCT 00193765) formed the cohort for this study. Patients were restaged according to the new staging system . Overall survival(OS) was estimated by the revised T stage for the entire cohort and separately for those who underwent END and those who did not (TND arm) using Kaplan Meier and log rank test . Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazard model making adjustment for neck treatment, T stage, site, prognostic factors and the interaction between revised T stage and neck treatment. Results: Of the 596 patients 577 were evaluable, with a median follow up of 77.57 months. Initial pT staging was pT1, 389(67.4%); pT2, 181(31.4%); pT3, 7(1.2%) and was modified to pT1, 195(33.8%); pT2, 280(48.5%); pT3, 102(17.7%) on restaging . 288 patients underwent END and 289 did not (TND arm). For the entire cohort 5-year OS rates were 79.0% [95 %CI, 73.12-84.88] for pT1, 69.4% [95% CI, 63.91-74.89] for pT2 and 53.0% [95% CI, 43.2 -62.8] for pT3 with significant difference between the 3 groups (p < 0.001). In those without upfront neck treatment( TND ), OS difference was maintained between the pT1 and pT2 groups [81.1% (95%CI, 73.26-88.94) vs 65.0% (95%CI, 56.77-73.23)], p = 0.004. This difference was not apparent in the END arm ,pT1 -76.9% (95 %CI, 68.47-85.33) vs pT2 -73.7% (95%CI, 66.25-81.15), p = 0.73. T3 tumours had uniformly poor survival irrespective of neck treatment. On multivariate analysis of the revised pT1/T2 cohort (n = 475), pT stage, neck treatment and grade were independent prognostic factors impacting OS. There was a significant interaction between the T stage and neck treatment (p = 0.03). Conclusions: When DOI < 10 mm, END supplants the prognostic implication of depth with similar outcomes for T1 and T2 tumours (new AJCC staging). The exact role of DOI on outcomes warrants further research. Clinical trial information: NCT00193765.

In this article, we highlight the evolution of a multimodal approach in the overall management of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) in India; present advances in technology (newer surgical techniques), novel medical and radiotherapy (RT) approaches; review their roles for an integrated approach for treating SCCHN and discuss the current role of immunotherapy in SCCHN. For locally advanced (LA) SCCHN, the multidisciplinary approach includes surgery followed by RT, with or without chemotherapy (CT) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Improved surgical techniques of reconstruction and voice-preservation are being implemented. Advanced forms of high-precision conformal techniques like intensity-modulated radiotherapy are used to deliver highly conformal doses to tumors, sparing the surrounding normal tissue. Compared with RT alone, novel CT regimens and targeted therapeutic agents have the potential to improve locoregional control and survival and reduce treatment-induced toxicities. Several clinical trials have demonstrated efficacy, safety, and quality of life benefits of adding cetuximab to RT regimens in LASCCHN. Studies have also suggested a cetuximab-related laryngeal preservation benefit. At progression, platinum-based CT combined with cetuximab (a monoclonal anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody) is the only validated option available as the first-line therapy. Thus, an integrated multidisciplinary approach plays a key role in maximizing patient outcomes, reduction in treatment related morbidities that consequently impact quality of life of survivors.

Thyroid withdrawal in preparation for radioiodine ablation (RIA) may have a profound impact on health-related quality of life (HRQL). Cost implications and scheduling limit the use of recombinant TSH and triiodothyronine (T3) with its shorter half-life is a conceptually attractive alternative. Prospective cohort study design with patients having withdrawal of thyroxine (n = 37) or T3 supplementation (n = 33). HRQL was assessed using EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-H&N35 and modified Billewicz questionnaires. Time interval to achieve optimal TSH levels (at least 30 mIU/ml) prior to RIA was determined. With the exception of emotional domain (QLQ-C30 p = 0.045), LT3 supplementation did not confer significant benefit when compared to LT4 withdrawal. Target serum TSH levels was achieved in 95% of patients by week 4 post thyroidectomy. LT3 supplementation delivered equivocal benefit and therefore the alternate strategies to minimize the impact on HRQL of reduction in the duration of hypothyroidism in T4 withdrawal are suggested.

Context: Eyelid carcinoma is rare tumors of the head and neck. They are rarely lethal but can be associated with significant morbidity if not treated early and appropriately. There are limited data available from world over and in particular the Indian subcontinent regarding eyelid carcinoma and its prognostic factors influencing treatment outcomes. Setting and Design:Retrospective study of patients treated in a tertiary cancer center between 2005 and 2016. Methodology: In this study, 51 patients with eyelid carcinoma treated at single tertiary cancer center were included. The demographic, clinical data, which includes the treatment received, histopathology report and follow–up, were recorded. All the relevant variables influencing disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed. Results: Sebaceous carcinoma was the most common eyelid carcinoma followed by squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma in descending order in this series. Lower eyelid was involved most often. The incidence of nodal metastasis was low (14%). Multivariate analysis revealed that margin status influenced the DFS (P= 0.001) (hazard ratios = 15.9 [95% confidence interval: 1.8–135.2]). The 5 years' DFS was 70%. Conclusion: Eyelid tumors are less common cancer with good prognosis if treated appropriately. The morbidity associated with treatment can be reduced if treated early.

Head and neck cancers include mucosal squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity, paranasal sinuses, pharynx (oropharynx, hypopharynx) and larynx. Although a heterogeneous group, broad principles of management are essentially the same baring the nasopharynx which is distinct. There have been recent changes in the understanding of the biology of these cancers with the increasing role of HPV infection in oropharyngeal cancers and the recognition of new prognostic variables (depth of invasion and extranodal extension) both incorporated into the staging system. Patients are triaged according to treatment intention into curative or palliative, a decision based on clinical and imaging evaluation. Given the intensity and sequelae of treatment, multidisciplinary care is beneficial. Early stage (I and II) are treated with single modality, whereas advanced stage (III and IV) cancers require multimodality therapy. The general dictum is surgery as the primary modality for oral and sinonasal cancers while in pharyngeal and laryngeal cancers non-surgical approaches are preferred. There is some scope of salvage of recurrences, with surgery or re-radiotherapy. Those not suitable for salvage or those with metastatic disease are treated with chemotherapy. There is an emerging role of robotic surgery and immunotherapy in the management of these cancers.

Oral and oropharyngeal cancers (OPC) are a major global health concern traditionally caused by tobacco and alcohol abuse. The last decade has revealed the emerging role of Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) as a major etiological factor for oropharyngeal cancer predominantly in the developed world. Cancers affecting both these subsites are distinct entities. Changes have been incorporated in the recent staging system with recognition of the prognostic importance of depth of invasion (DOI) and extranodal extension (ENE) for oral cancers as well as the favourable biology of HPV-related cancers necessitating a separate staging system and attempts at deintensification of treatment. Oral cancers are predominantly treated by primary surgery and oropharyngeal cancers with non-surgical approaches. The advent of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has resulted in its exploration of its role for select oropharyngeal cancers. There has been an emergence of recent new data which has resulted in changes in traditional management protocols of these cancers.

Purpose: The rapid spread of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic around the world caused most healthcare services to turn substantial attention to treatment of these patients and also to alter the structure of healthcare systems to address an infectious disease. As a result, many cancer patients had their treatment deferred during the pandemic, increasing the time to treatment initiation, the number of untreated patients (which will alter the dynamics of healthcare delivery in the post-pandemic era) and increasing their risk of death. Hence, we analyzed the impact on global cancer mortality considering the decline in oncology care during the COVID-19 outbreak using head and neck cancer, a known time-dependent disease, as a model. Methods: An online practical tool capable of predicting the risk of cancer patients dying due to the COVID-19 outbreak and also useful for mitigation strategies after the peak of the pandemic has been developed, based on a mathematical model. The scenarios were estimated by information of 15 oncological services worldwide, given a perspective from the five continents and also some simulations were conducted at world demographic data. Results: The model demonstrates that the more that cancer care was maintained during the outbreak and also the more it is increased during the mitigation period, the shorter will be the recovery, lessening the additional risk of dying due to time to treatment initiation. Conclusions: This impact of COVID-19 pandemic on cancer patients is inevitable, but it is possible to minimize it with an effort measured by the proposed model.

Among the reconstructive options available for buccal mucosa defects with an intact mandible, free flap with microvascular anastomosis is the best option. However, in the developing world, with poor resources, limited in- frastructure, and high patient load, this cannot be offered to all patients. We report on the success of the masseter flap for reconstruction of such defects in carefully selected patients. Despite some known limitations, this flap is easy to learn and carries acceptable complications. The results of this flap may not be comparable to those of microvas- cular reconstructions, but they are better than those from other options such as skin graft, nasolabial flap, submental flap, etc. in terms of surgical time required, no donor site morbidity, and minimal aesthetic deformity.

Purpose The rapid spread of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic around the world caused most healthcare services to turn substantial attention to treatment of these patients and also to alter the structure of healthcare systems to address an infectious disease. As a result, many cancer patients had their treatment deferred during the pandemic, increasing the time-to-treatment initiation, the number of untreated patients (which will alter the dynamics of healthcare delivery in the post-pandemic era) and increasing their risk of death. Hence, we analyzed the impact on global cancer mortality considering the decline in oncology care during the COVID-19 outbreak using head and neck cancer, a known time-dependent disease, as a model. Methods An online practical tool capable of predicting the risk of cancer patients dying due to the COVID-19 outbreak and also useful for mitigation strategies after the peak of the pandemic has been developed, based on a mathematical model. The scenarios were estimated by information of 15 oncological services worldwide, given a perspective from the five continents and also some simulations were conducted at world demographic data. Results The model demonstrates that the more that cancer care was maintained during the outbreak and also the more it is increased during the mitigation period, the shorter will be the recovery, lessening the additional risk of dying due to time-to-treatment initiation. Conclusions This impact of COVID-19 pandemic on cancer patients is inevitable, but it is possible to minimize it with an effort measured by the proposed model. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10552-021-01411-7.

Purpose Chemoradiation with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 given once every 3 weeks is the standard of care in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer (LAHNSCC). Increasingly, low-dose once-a-week cisplatin is substituted because of perceived lower toxicity and convenience. However, there is no level 1 evidence of comparable efficacy to cisplatin once every 3 weeks. Patients and Methods In this phase III randomized trial, we assessed the noninferiority of cisplatin 30 mg/m2 given once a week compared with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 given once every 3 weeks, both administered concurrently with curative intent radiotherapy in patients with LAHNSCC. The primary end point was locoregional control (LRC); secondary end points included toxicity, compliance, response, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Results Between 2013 and 2017, we randomly assigned 300 patients, 150 to each arm. Two hundred seventy-nine patients (93%) received chemoradiotherapy in the adjuvant setting. At a median follow-up of 22 months, the estimated cumulative 2-year LRC rate was 58.5% in the once-a-week arm and 73.1% in the once-every-3-weeks arm, leading to an absolute difference of 14.6% (95% CI, 5.7% to 23.5%); P = .014; hazard ratio (HR), 1.76 (95% CI, 1.11 to 2.79). Acute toxicities of grade 3 or higher occurred in 71.6% of patients in the once-a-week arm and in 84.6% of patients in the once-every-3-weeks arm ( P = .006). Estimated median progression-free survival in the once-a-week arm was 17.7 months (95% CI, 0.42 to 35.05 months) and in the once-every-3-weeks arm, 28.6 months (95% CI, 15.90 to 41.30 months); HR, 1.24 (95% CI, 0.89 to 1.73); P = .21. Estimated median overall survival in the once-a-week arm was 39.5 months and was not reached in the once-every-3-weeks arm (HR, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.79 to 1.65]; P = .48). Conclusion Once-every-3-weeks cisplatin at 100 mg/m2 resulted in superior LRC, albeit with more toxicity, than did once-a-week cisplatin at 30 mg/m2, and should remain the preferred chemoradiotherapy regimen for LAHNSCC in the adjuvant setting.

Introduction Strengthening The Reporting Of Cohort Studies in Surgery (STROCSS) guidelines were developed in 2017 in order to improve the reporting quality of observational studies in surgery and updated in 2019. In order to maintain relevance and continue upholding good reporting quality among observational studies in surgery, we aimed to update STROCSS 2019 guidelines. Methods A STROCSS 2021 steering group was formed to come up with proposals to update STROCSS 2019 guidelines. An expert panel of researchers assessed these proposals and judged whether they should become part of STROCSS 2021 guidelines or not, through a Delphi consensus exercise. Results 42 people (89%) completed the DELPHI survey and hence participated in the development of STROCSS 2021 guidelines. All items received a score between 7 and 9 by greater than 70% of the participants, indicating a high level of agreement among the DELPHI group members with the proposed changes to all the items. Conclusion We present updated STROCSS 2021 guidelines to ensure ongoing good reporting quality among observational studies in surgery., Highlights • In order to maintain relevance and continue upholding good reporting quality among observational studies in surgery, STROCSS 2019 guidelines were updated through a DELPHI consensus exercise. • 42 people participated in the development of STROCSS 2021 guidelines and there was a high level of agreement among the DELPHI group members with the proposed changes to all the items. • Updated STROCSS 2021 guideline is presented.

Background The purpose of this study was to present our findings on the treatment completion rates and outcomes in geriatric patients with head and neck cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by definitive therapy. Methods Geriatric patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were selected for this analysis. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated. Results Forty-six of 49 patients completed neoadjuvant chemotherapy (93.9%). The compliance to local treatment was 73.3% and the median OS was 49.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 22.0-77.8 months) in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy for organ preservation (n = 15). In patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for technically unresectable disease, the corresponding figures were 82.06% and 9.0 months (95% CI = 5.9-12.1 months), respectively. Conclusion Individualized neoadjuvant chemotherapy protocols in geriatric patients have high compliance rates to treatment and the median OS in geriatric patients treated for organ preservation is similar to that of young patients. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 39: 886-892, 2017.

BACKGROUND The rates and factors associated with the return to work of head and neck cancer survivors from low- and middle-income countries, such as India, are largely unknown. METHODS We conducted a preliminary cross-sectional survey of 250 consecutive eligible head and neck cancer survivors (age

Contains fulltext : 220043.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) The 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a highly contagious zoonosis produced by SARS-CoV-2 that is spread human-to-human by respiratory secretions. It was declared by the WHO as a public health emergency. The most susceptible populations, needing mechanical ventilation, are the elderly and people with associated comorbidities. There is an important risk of contagion for anesthetists, dentists, head and neck surgeons, maxillofacial surgeons, ophthalmologists, and otolaryngologists. Health workers represent between 3.8% and 20% of the infected population; some 15% will develop severe complaints and among them, many will lose their lives. A large number of patients do not have overt signs and symptoms (fever/respiratory), yet pose a real risk to surgeons (who should know this fact and must therefore apply respiratory protective strategies for all patients they encounter). All interventions that have the potential to aerosolize aerodigestive secretions should be avoided or used only when mandatory. Health workers who are: pregnant, over 55 to 65 years of age, with a history of chronic diseases (uncontrolled hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, and all clinical scenarios where immunosuppression is feasible, including that induced to treat chronic inflammatory conditions and organ transplants) should avoid the clinical attention of a potentially infected patient. Health care facilities should prioritize urgent and emergency visits and procedures until the present condition stabilizes; truly elective care should cease and discussed on a case-by-case basis for patients with cancer. For those who are working with COVID-19 infected patients' isolation is compulsory in the following settings: (a) unprotected close contact with COVID-19 pneumonia patients; (b) onset of fever, cough, shortness of breath, and other symptoms (gastrointestinal complaints, anosmia, and dysgeusia have been reported in a minority of cases). For any care or intervention in the upper aerodigestive tract region, irrespective of the setting and a confirmed diagnosis (eg, rhinoscopy or flexible laryngoscopy in the outpatient setting and tracheostomy or rigid endoscopy under anesthesia), it is strongly recommended that all health care personnel wear personal protective equipment such as N95, gown, cap, eye protection, and gloves. The procedures described are essential in trying to maintain safety of health care workers during COVID-19 pandemic. In particular, otolaryngologists, head and neck, and maxillofacial surgeons are per se exposed to the greatest risk of infection while caring for COVID-19 positive subjects, and their protection should be considered a priority in the present circumstances. 01 juni 2020

Oral tumor microenvironment is characterized by chronic inflammation signified with infiltrating leukocytes and soluble mediators which cause immune suppression. However, how immunosuppressive cells like myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) maintain the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and influence T cell function in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients remains poorly understood. In the present study, we found that percentages of MDSCs were higher in oral cancer patients compared to healthy individuals and correlated with cancer stage. Monocytic MDSCs (M-MDSCs) were prevalent in the periphery, while granulocytic/polymorphonuclear subset dominated the tumor compartment. M-MDSCs suppressed the lymphocyte proliferation and decreased the CD3-ζ (zeta) chain expression and interferon gamma production. The percentage of M-MDSCs in peripheral blood correlated inversely with CD3-ζ chain expression in T cells of these patients. Interleukin 6 (IL-6)-induced phosphorylated STAT3-regulated programmed cell death ligand 1, CCAAT/enhancer-binding proteins alpha and beta and Interleukin 10 expression in MDSCs. MDSCs inhibited TGF-β-driven generation of induced regulatory T cells in vitro. M-MDSCs secreted interleukins IL-6, IL-1β, IL-23 and PGE2 and facilitated T-helper 17 (Th17) cell differentiation which utilizes nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenase 2 enzyme activity. Interestingly, OSCC patients showed increased levels of Th17 cells in peripheral blood and tumor tissue. Thus, increased frequency of MDSCs, Th17 cells and decreased expression of CD3-ζ chain portray T cell tolerance and chronic inflammatory state facilitating tumor growth.

Objective To evaluate the survival outcomes for a cohort of nasopharyngeal cancer with intracranial extension (ICE) treated with induction chemotherapy (ICT) followed by chemo-intensity-modulated radiotherapy (CTRT) at a tertiary cancer center. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 45 patients with histologically proven, non-metastatic NPC with ICE treated at our institute between October 2008 and October 2016. Patients were classified as minor ICE or major ICE, based on the extent of ICE. All the patients received 2–3 cycles of a taxane-based ICT regimen followed by CTRT. Radiotherapy was delivered with “risk-adapted” intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) technique in all patients. Results After a median follow up of 45 months (range: 8–113 months), the estimated 5-year DFS, LRFS, DMFS, and OS of the entire cohort was 58%, 82%, 67% and 74% respectively. On multivariate analysis, histological subtype was an independent predictor of LRFS, and age was an independent predictor of DFS. The extent of ICE showed only a trend towards worse DFS (P = 0.06). None of the factors significantly predicted for DMFS or OS. Gender, N-stage, and response to ICT did not significantly affect any of the outcomes. Grade 2 or worse subcutaneous fibrosis was seen in 22% of patients and grade 2 or worse xerostomia was seen in 24% of patients at last follow up. Thirty-three percent of the patients developed clinical hypothyroidism at last follow up. None of the patients experienced any neurological or vascular complications. Conclusions Taxane-based induction chemotherapy followed by chemo-intensity modulated radiotherapy resulted in excellent locoregional control and survival with acceptable toxicities in patients of nasopharyngeal cancer with intracranial extension. Distant metastasis continues to be the predominant problem in these patients.

Oral cavity cancers are treated by surgery with or without adjuvant therapy. Being the most important prognostic factor, neck node management is an important aspect of treating oral cancers. There are numerous areas of debate in the management of the node-negative and node-positive neck. In an attempt to answer these questions, a large volume of literature has been generated over the last few decades. This review article describes the current evidence and approach considerations for the management of cervical nodes in patients with oral cavity cancers.

BACKGROUND Orocutaneous fistula (OCF) is one of the frequently encountered postoperative complications following surgery for oral cancer, leading to prolonged hospital stay and delay in the initiation of adjuvant therapy. METHODS We included all patients with oral cancer operated between January 2016 to December 2017 and at risk to develop an OCF. We assessed the incidence of OCF, its management, and factors predisposing to its development. RESULTS Of 587 eligible patients, 9% developed OCF. On univariate and multivariate analysis, patients undergoing bilateral neck dissection or with surgical site infection (SSI) (P

BACKGROUND: Routine use of frozen section (FS) is a costly procedure and sparsely available in resource poor countries. A proper cost benefit analysis may help to reduce its routine use and would empower surgeons to perform oral cancer surgeries without having FS facility. FS is performed to identify microscopic spread beyond gross disease that cannot be assessed clinically. OBJECTIVE: Our primary aim was to determine the cost benefit analysis of FS in the assessment of margins in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of prospectively collected data of 1311 consecutive patients who were operated between January 2012 and October 2013. The gross and microscopic margin status of each patient was extracted from the patient's chart. The cost estimates were performed to calculate the financial burden of FS as well as expenses incurred on adjuvant treatment resulting from inadequate margins. RESULT: Microscopic spread changed the gross margin status in 5.2% (65/1237) patients. Of this entire cohort of 1237 patients, FS helped 29 (2.3%) patients to achieve tumor free margin, and it changed the adjuvant treatment plan in 9 (0.7%) patients. The cost of FS for each patient was INR 11052. The cost-benefit ratio of FS was 12:1. Gross examination alone could have identified majority of the inadequate margins. CONCLUSION: Frozen section for assessment of margin status bears poor cost-benefit ratio. Meticulous gross examination of the entire surgical specimen is sufficient to identify majority of inadequate margins.

International audience; Background : The eighth international symposium for sentinel node biopsy (SNB) in head and neck cancer was held in 2018. This consensus conference aimed to deliver current multidisciplinary guidelines. This document focuses on the surgical aspects of SNB for oral cancer.Method : Invited expert faculty selected topics requiring guidelines. Topics were reviewed and evidence evaluated where available. Data were presented at the consensus meeting, with live debate from panels comprising expert, nonexpert, and patient representatives followed by voting to assess the level of support for proposed recommendations. Evidence review, debate, and voting results were all considered in constructing these guidelines. Results/conclusion : A range of topics were considered, from patient selection to surgical technique and follow-up schedule. Consensus was not achieved in all areas, highlighting potential issues that would benefit from prospective studies. Nevertheless these guidelines represent an up-to-date pragmatic recommendation based on current evidence and expert opinion.

PURPOSE The aim of the current work is to provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing physicians and others on the management of the neck in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx. METHODS ASCO convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, surgery, radiation oncology, and advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 1990 through 2018. Outcomes of interest included survival, regional disease control, neck recurrence, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. RESULTS The literature search identified 124 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. Six clinical scenarios were devised; three for oral cavity cancer and three for oropharynx cancer, and recommendations were generated for each one. RECOMMENDATIONS For oral cavity cancers, clinical scenarios focused on the indications for and the hallmarks of a high-quality neck dissection, indications for postoperative radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, and whether radiotherapy alone is sufficient elective treatment of an undissected neck compared with high-quality neck dissection. For oropharynx cancers, clinical scenarios focused on hallmarks of a high-quality neck dissection, factors that would favor operative versus nonoperative primary management, and clarifying criteria for an incomplete response to definitive chemoradiation for which salvage neck dissection would be recommended. Consensus was reached and recommendations were made for all six clinical scenarios. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines .

Head and neck cancers constitute a third of the cancer burden in India. These cancers have unique patient characteristics, presentation, and etiological differences from those in the West. Socioeconomic constraints, large patient population, scarcity of trained health workers, and inadequate infrastructure are major challenges faced in the management of these cancers. Despite these constraints, patients are treated with evidence based guidelines that are tailored to the local scenario.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) associated head and neck squamous cell cancers (HNSCC) have become increasingly common in the West, but the same cannot be said about India. These cancers have a different biology and confer a better prognosis, however, its current role in the management of patients in India is not clearly defined. At the 35th Indian Cooperative Oncology Network conference held in September 2016, a panel of radiation, surgical and medical oncologists, pathologists, and basic scientists from across the country having experience in clinical research with respect to HPV in HNSCC reviewed the available literature from India. All the ideas and facts were thereafter collated in this report. Various topics of controversy in dealing with the diagnosis and management of HPV-associated HNSCC have been highlighted in this report in context to the Indian scenario. Furthermore, the prevalence of the same and its association with tobacco and high-risk sexual behavior has been touched on. Conclusively, a set of recommendations has been proposed by the panel to guide the practicing oncologists of the country while dealing with HPV-associated HNSCC.

Thyroid gland is an uncommon site of metastasis, and metastasis to the gland secondary to nasopharyngeal carcinoma is seldom seen. We were only able to identify eight reported cases in the literature. A 61-year-old man, diagnosed case of nasopharyngeal cancer–second primary ( first primary-oropharynx), was found to have a thyroid nodule on routine follow-up positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scan. There was no evidence of metastases at any other sites. The thyroid nodule was confirmed as metastatic carcinoma by fine needle aspiration cytology. He was treated with multimodal treatment comprising of surgery followed by reirradiation with concurrent chemotherapy. Subsequently, at the first follow-up (2 months after completion of all treatment), the patient remained asymptomatic, but the response assessment with PET-CT scan was suggestive of lung metastases with no evidence of locoregional disease. Although thyroid parenchymal metastasis is an uncommon occurrence and signifies a poor prognosis, in appropriately selected patients, aggressive therapy with reirradiation and chemotherapy may improve local control and quality of life.

Multicompartmental trigeminal schwannomas (MTSs) are a rare and complex but treatable group of tumors. Herein, we describe the clinicoradiologic presentation of two patients with MTS. The two illustrated distinct case reports highlight the role of imaging and the outcome of two different types of MTS. The Discussion summarizes the literature to date, which will help the reader diagnose these tumors in a timely manner and manage them appropriately.

Objective:This study aimed to assess the utility of onlay pectoralis major myofascial flap in preventing pharyngocutaneous fistula following salvage total laryngectomy.Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed of 172 patients who underwent salvage laryngectomy for recurrent carcinoma of the larynx or hypopharynx between 1999 and 2014. One hundred and ten patients underwent primary closure and 62 patients had pectoralis major myofascial flap onlay.Results:The overall pharyngocutaneous fistula rate was 43 per cent, and was similar in both groups (primary closure group, 43.6 per cent; onlay flap group, 41.9 per cent; p = 0.8). Fistulae in the onlay flap group healed faster: the median and mean fistula duration were 37 and 55 days, respectively, in the primary closure group and 20 and 25 days, respectively, in the onlay flap group (p = 0.008).Conclusion:Use of an onlay pectoralis major myofascial flap did not decrease the pharyngocutaneous fistula rate, although fistula duration was shortened. A well-designed randomised-controlled trial is needed to establish parameters for its routine use in clinical practice.

Toxicities resulting from platinum based chemotherapy in head and neck cancer is a cause for much concern. There is a lack of clinical criteria for defining these patient populations, which has posed serious problems associated with increased morbidity and consequently an adverse effect on patients' quality of life. In addition, there is a lack of consensus on clinical criteria for defining such patient populations, who may be unsuitable for concurrent chemoradiotherapy. A group of experts in the field of head and neck cancer from the Asia Pacific Region convened in August 2014 in Korea to discuss the development of a set of clinical criteria in order to fill the knowledge gap and provide a reference tool for head and neck oncologists. This paper reports the final output from this meeting and the accompanying literature review, with the aim of aiding clinical decision making with the help of some clinical criteria to identify platinum unsuitable patient populations in head and neck cancer management. Some alternative treatment options are also discussed in this paper. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.

Despite easy access to clinical examination majority of oral cancer patients ironically present with locally advanced disease, which is a heterogeneous group that includes all stage III/IV tumours in absence of distant metastasis. The AJCC TNM classification has included all tumours with depth of invasion >1 cm into locally advanced group irrespective of their surface dimensions. Surgery followed by adjuvant therapy provides best results and should be offered to all patients when operable. There have been a slew of recent publications popularising the concept of compartmental excision in variance to traditional resection with adequate margins. The role of chemotherapy has been explored in this group of patients for both organ preservation as well as to aid bioselection of suitable patients with borderline operable tumours for surgery.

6560 Background: As per the AJCC 8th edition ENE/ECS is the most important predictor for N staging of HNSCC and is one of the key predictor of outcomes. Because ENE/ECS is based on pathological findings after surgery and it is difficult to predict outcomes for locally advanced squamous head and neck cancer (LASHNC) treated radically with CCRT. We hypothesized that ENE assessed by CT imaging (rENE) may directly correlate with outcomes in LASHNC treated radically with CCRT. Methods: This open-label, investigator-initiated, phase 3, randomized trial was conducted from 2012 to 2018. Adult patients with LASHNC who were fit for radical chemoradiation were randomized 1:1 to receive either radical radiotherapy (66-70 grays) with concurrent weekly cisplatin (30 mg/m2) (CRT) or the same schedule of CRT with weekly nimotuzumab (200 mg) (NCRT). 536 patients were accrued,182 were excluded due to non-availability DICOM CT scan, 354 patients were analysed for rENE (based on 6 criterion for metastasis and 3 for rENE). Near equal distribution of patients was achieved in CRT arm (170 patients) and NCRT arm (184 patients). There were 181 (51.1%) oropharynx and 173(48.9%) larynx and hypopharynx patients. We evaluated association of radiological ENE and clinical outcomes.The endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS), duration of locoregional control (LRC), and overall survival (OS). Results: There were 244(68.9%) patients with radiologically metastatic nodes, out of which 140(57.3%) had rENE. There was no significant association between rENE and CRT (p value 0.3) or NCRT (p value 0.412). The median follow-up was 33.0 months (95%CI 30.7-35.2 months). Complete response was achieved in 204 (57.6%) cases, PR/SD in 126(35.6%) cases and PD in 24(6.8%) cases. rENE positive patients had poor overall 3-year survival (46.7%), poor DFS (48.8%) and LRC (39.9%) than rENE negative cases (63.6%, 87%, 60.4%). rENE positive cases had 1.71 times increase chances of incomplete response than rENE negative cases. Overall stage, clinical positive node, response, rENE and site were the only significant factors for predicting OS, DFS and LRC. Conclusions: In conclusion, pre-treatment rENE can be regarded as an independent prognostic factor for survival (OS, DFS, LRC) in patients with LASHNC treated radically with CCRT. Pre-treatment rENE is not only associated with CCRT response but is also associated with poor prognosis and hence rENE, as an imaging biomarker, can stratify responder’s vs non-responders. Clinical trial information: CTRI/2014/09/004980 .

6518 Background: The study objective was to evaluate the non-Inferiority of survival and ability to preserve mandible with the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in locally advanced oral cancers compared to upfront surgery alone without compromising survival. Methods: This study was a randomized, single centre, non-inferiority trial. Eligibility criteria included treatment naïve histologically confirmed cancer of the oral cavity; cancers requiring segmental resection for paramandibular disease without clinicoradiological evidence of bone erosion, clinical T2, T3 and T4, any N, M0 as per TNM (AJCC) 7th edition, age at least 18 years; and written informed consent. The patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either upfront surgery followed by adjuvant treatment (Standard arm-SA) or receive two cycles of three drugs NACT (Docetaxel, Cisplatin, 5-Flurouracil) at three weekly interval (Intervention arm-IA). Depending on the response after two cycles, the patient would either receive an additional third cycle or undergo surgery followed by adjuvant treatment as decided by the tumour board. The primary endpoint was mandible preservation rate at 30% in the experimental arm. The secondary end points being Loco regional control and treatment related toxicity. Results: Between September 2010 and April 2013, 68 patients were enrolled and randomized to SA (34 patients) and IA (34 patients) with a median follow-up of 3.6 years (IQR 0.95- 7.05 years). Majority of the patients were T4 (n = 40, 58.8%) In the IA 28 patients had partial response (n = 28,82.4%), with a mandible preservation (Marginal Mandibulectomy) rate of 48% (n = 16/34). There were no close or positive margins in the IA. All patients received adjuvant treatment. The number of recurrences was similar in both the arms. All patients in the IA developed toxicities with the majority developing Grade III-IV toxicities (Grade III: 14, 41.2%, Grade IV: 11, 32.4%) (p = 0.739). The disease free survival (DFS) (p = 0.715, HR 0.911[0.516-1.607]) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.747, HR 0.899[0.510-1.587]) were similar in both the arms. Conclusions: NACT seems to be a feasible option for mandibular preservation with acceptable toxicities in a select group of patients without compromising survival. However this needs to be tested in a larger phase III randomized trial. Clinical trial information: CTRI/2015/11/006396 .

Background Because the addition of nimotuzumab to chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer improved outcomes in a phase 2 study, the authors conducted a phase 3 study to confirm these findings. Methods This open-label, investigator-initiated, phase 3, randomized trial was conducted from 2012 to 2018. Adult patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer who were fit for radical chemoradiation were randomized 1:1 to receive either radical radiotherapy (66-70 grays) with concurrent weekly cisplatin (30 mg/m2 ) (CRT) or the same schedule of CRT with weekly nimotuzumab (200 mg) (NCRT).The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); key secondary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS), duration of locoregional control (LRC), and overall survival (OS). An intent-to-treat analysis also was performed. Results In total, 536 patients were allocated equally to both treatment arms. The median follow-up was 39.13 months. The addition of nimotuzumab improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.53-0.89; P = .004), LRC (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.50-0.89; P = .006), and DFS (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55-0.92; P = .008) and had a trend toward improved OS (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.65-1.08; P = .163). Grade 3 through 5 adverse events were similar between the 2 arms, except for a higher incidence of mucositis in the NCRT arm (66.7% vs 55.8%; P = .01). Conclusions The addition of nimotuzumab to concurrent weekly CRT improves PFS, LRC, and DFS. This combination provides a novel alternative therapeutic option to a 3-weekly schedule of 100 mg/m2 cisplatin in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer who are treated with radical-intent CRT.

The clinically node negative neck in early oral cancers amenable to per oral excision was addressed by a wait and watch policy followed by a therapeutic neck dissection in patients that developed nodal metastasis or with elective neck dissection. With lack of conclusive evidence for or against either approach, there was no consensus with regards optimum management of these patients. Recent Level I evidence by way of a large randomized trial as well as two subsequent meta-analysis conclusively show benefit in favour of elective neck treatment in the vast majority of patients. Preoperative imaging and tumour factors that possibly could identify patients at high risk of metastasis have their limitations. Early detection of nodal metastasis with possibility of salvage with a wait and watch approach is also ineffective. Elective neck dissection should be the standard of care in this clinical situation given compelling survival advantage in its favour.

Oral cancer is a global disease. Despite a well elucidated tumour progression model, these cancers present late. Attempts at early detection by way of adjunctive diagnostic technologies and screening have not lived up to expectations in spite initial promise. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment. Treatment intensification by way of adjuvant radiation/chemo radiation is warranted for those with high risk features. Recent studies have explored intensification in those with intermediate risk factors in an attempt to improve outcomes. There has been generation of recent robust evidence that has influenced the need and extent of neck dissection. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) may have a potential role in organ preservation and borderline resectable oral cancers. Recurrent tumours should be offered surgery whenever feasible while the addition of biological agents to chemotherapy gives best results in the palliative settings.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is an important emerging etiology for head and neck cancers (HNCs) worldwide. Considering its impact on prognosis, it is important to understand the true prevalence of HPV-associated HNCs in India. This article reviews the prevalence of HPV-related HNCs across various studies in India where the population is predominantly tobacco users, and studies its outcomes with respect to HPV.