Search

Abstract Background Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma is one of the most commonly diagnosed carcinomas in China, and postoperative radiotherapy plays an important role in improving the prognosis of patients. Carcinomas in different locations of the oesophagus could have different patterns of lymph node metastasis after surgery. Methods In this multicentric retrospective study, we enrolled patients with middle thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinomas from 3 cancer centres, and none of the patients underwent radiotherapy before or after surgery. We analysed the lymph node recurrence rates in different stations to explore the postoperative lymphatic recurrence pattern. Results From January 1st, 2014, to December 31st, 2019, 132 patients met the criteria, and were included in this study. The lymphatic recurrence rate was 62.1%. Pathological stage (P = 0.032) and lymphadenectomy method (P = 0.006) were significant predictive factors of lymph node recurrence. The recurrence rates in the supraclavicular, upper and lower paratracheal stations of lymph nodes were 32.6%, 28.8% and 16.7%, respectively, showing a high incidence. The recurrence rate of the subcarinal node station was 9.8%, while 8.3% (upper, middle and lower) thoracic para-oesophageal nodes had recurrences. Conclusions We recommend including the supraclavicular, upper and lower paratracheal stations of lymph nodes in the postoperative radiation field in middle thoracic oesophageal carcinomas. Subcarinal station is also potentially high-risk, while whether to include thoracic para-oesophageal or abdominal nodes needs careful consideration.

BackgroundPostoperative radiotherapy (PORT) is an important treatment for lung cancer patients with poor prognostic features, but accurate delineation of the clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OARs) is challenging and time-consuming. Recently, deep learning-based artificial intelligent (AI) algorithms have shown promise in automating this process.ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical utility of a deep learning-based auto-segmentation model for AI-assisted delineating CTV and OARs in patients undergoing PORT, and to compare its accuracy and efficiency with manual delineation by radiation oncology residents from different levels of medical institutions.MethodsWe previously developed an AI auto-segmentation model in 664 patients and validated its contouring performance in 149 patients. In this multi-center, validation trial, we prospectively involved 55 patients and compared the accuracy and efficiency of 3 contouring methods: (i) unmodified AI auto-segmentation, (ii) fully manual delineation by junior radiation oncology residents from different medical centers, and (iii) manual modifications based on AI segmentation model (AI-assisted delineation). The ground truth of CTV and OARs was delineated by 3 senior radiation oncologists. Contouring accuracy was evaluated by Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance (HD), and mean distance of agreement (MDA). Inter-observer consistency was assessed by volume and coefficient of variation (CV).ResultsAI-assisted delineation achieved significantly higher accuracy compared to unmodified AI auto-contouring and fully manual delineation by radiation oncologists, with median HD, MDA, and DCS values of 20.03 vs. 21.55 mm, 2.57 vs. 3.06 mm, 0.745 vs. 0.703 (all P

BackgroundCerebral radiation necrosis (RN), a severe complication of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), has been shown to significantly decrease patient survival time and quality of life. The purpose of this study was to analyze whether bevacizumab can prevent or reduce the occurrence of SRT-induced cerebral RN in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of NSCLC patients with brain metastases from March 2013 to June 2023 who were treated with SRT. Patients were divided into two groups: those in the bevacizumab group received SRT with four cycles of bevacizumab, and patients in the control group received SRT only. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was performed based on a multinomial propensity score model to balance the baseline characteristics. The chi-square test was used. A Cox model was used to evaluate overall survival (OS).ResultsA total of 80 patients were enrolled, namely, 28 patients in the bevacizumab group and 52 patients in the control group. The possibility of developing cerebral RN and/or symptomatic edema (RN/SE) was significantly decreased in patients treated with bevacizumab compared to those who did not receive bevacizumab before IPTW (p=0.036) and after IPTW (p=0.015) according to chi-square analysis. The IPTW-adjusted median OS was 47.7 months (95% CI 27.4-80.8) for patients in the bevacizumab group and 44.1 months (95% CI 36.7-68.0) (p=0.364) for patients in the control group.ConclusionThe application of bevacizumab concurrent with SRT may prevent or reduce the occurrence of cerebral RN in NSCLC patients with brain metastases.

Abstract Background Immunotherapy has made significant advances in the treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), but data in combination with radiotherapy are scarce. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of chemoimmunotherapy combined with thoracic radiotherapy in patients with ES-SCLC. Methods This single-center retrospective study analyzed patients with ES-SCLC who received standard platinum–etoposide chemotherapy combined with atezolizumab or durvalumab immunotherapy as induction treatment, followed by consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (CTRT) before disease progression in the first-line setting. Adverse events during radiotherapy with or without maintenance immunotherapy and survival outcomes were assessed. Results Between December 2019 and November 2021, 36 patients with ES-SCLC were identified to have received such treatment modality at one hospital. The number of metastatic sites at diagnosis was 1–4. The biological effective dose of CTRT ranged from 52 to 113 Gy. Only two patients (6%) developed grade 3 toxic effect of thrombocytopenia, but none experienced grade 4 or 5 toxicity. Four patients developed immune-related pneumonitis during the induction treatment period but successfully completed later CTRT. The rate of radiation-related pneumonitis was 8% with grades 1–2 and well tolerated. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.8 months, but the median overall survival (OS) was not determined. The estimated 1-year OS was 80.2% and 1-year PFS was 53.4%. Conclusions Immunotherapy combined with CTRT for ES-SCLC is safe and has ample survival benefit.

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) for preventive or delayed treatment in neutropenia, completion rate of concurrent chemoradiotherapy and hospitalization rate in patients with esophageal squamous carcinoma during definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Methods: A total of 70 patients with esophageal squamous carcinoma in Peking University Cancer Hospital from January 2019 to December 2020, who received PEG-rhG-CSF during concurrent chemoradiotherapy, were enrolled in this retrospective analysis. There were 32 patients in the preventive group, and 38 patients in the delayed group. The incidence of neutropenia, completion rate of concurrent chemoradiotherapy and neutropenia-related hospitalization rate were compared between PEG-rhG-CSF preventive group and delayed group. Results: The incidence of severe neutropenia (Grades 3–4) in all patients was 31.4%. Comparison between preventive group and delayed group showed that the incidence of severe neutropenia was 6.3% and 39.4% (χ2 ​= ​10.428, P ​= ​0.001), respectively. In preventive group, the incidence of severe neutropenia was 3.7% and 20.0%, respectively, for primary prevention and secondary prevention of PEG-rhG-CSF (χ2 ​= ​12.321, P ​= ​0.001). The completion rate of concurrent chemoradiotherapy was 93.8% in the preventive group and 63.2% in the delayed group (χ2 ​= ​9.220, P ​= ​0.002). The incidence of treatment interruption was 25.7% in the whole group, 12.5% in the preventive group and 36.8% in the delayed group (χ2 ​= ​5.389, P ​= ​0.020). Seven patients (7/70, 10.0%) were hospitalized and treated with intravenous antibiotics for neutropenia, including 1 in the preventive group and 6 in the delayed group (P ​= ​0.078). Conclusions: Prophylactic use of PEG-rhG-CSF during concurrent chemoradiotherapy for patients with esophageal squamous carcinoma can effectively reduce the incidence of neutropenia, ensure the safety of treatment, and improve the completion rate of concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Abstract Background To study lymphatic recurrence distribution after radical surgery in the real world and guide clinical tumor volume delineation for regional lymph nodes during postoperative radiotherapy for lower thoracic squamous cell esophageal carcinomas. Methods We enrolled patients who underwent radical esophagectomy, without radiation before or after surgery, at 3 cancer hospitals. Patients were classified into groups according to tumor locations. We included patients with tumors in the lower thoracic segment and analyzed the postoperative lymph node recurrence mode. A cutoff value of 10% was used to differentiate high-risk lymph node drainage areas from others. Results We enrolled 1905 patients in the whole study series, including 652 thoracic esophageal carcinomas that met our inclusion criteria; there were 241 cases of lower thoracic esophageal carcinomas. 1st, 2nd, 4th, 7th, 8th groups of lymph nodes, according to the 8th edition of the AJCC classification, displayed as high-risk recurrence areas, representing 17.8%, 23.9%, 11.7%, 10.9% and 12.2% of lymph node recurrence. Stage III-IV tumors located in the lower segment of the thoracic esophagus showed a tendency to recur in the left gastric nodes (7.9%) and celiac nodes (10.6%). Conclusions According to our results, we recommended including the 4th, 7th and 8th groups of lymph nodes in the radiation field, and for patients with stage III-IV disease, the 17th and 20th groups of nodes should be irradiated during postoperative treatment. Whether including 1st/2nd groups in preventive irradiation needed more proofs.

Abstract Background There is no consensus on the therapeutic approach to ECOG 2 patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC), despite the sizable percentage of these patients in clinical practice. This study focused on the efficacy, toxicity and the optimal chemotherapy regimen of CCRT in ECOG 2 patients in a phase III trial. Methods Patients capable of all self-care with bed rest for less than 50% of daytime were classified as ECOG 2 subgroup. A subgroup analysis was performed for ECOG 2 patients recruited in the phase III trial receiving concurrent EP (etoposide + cisplatin)/PC (paclitaxel + carboplatin) chemotherapy with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or three-dimensional conformal external beam radiation therapy (3D-CRT). Results A total of 71 ECOG 2 patients were enrolled into the study. Forty-six (64.8%) patients were treated with IMRT technique. The median overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) for ECOG 2 patients were 16.4 months and 9 months, respectively. No difference was observed in treatment compliance and toxicities between ECOG 2 patients and ECOG 0–1 patients. Within the ECOG 2 group (31 in the EP arm and 40 in the PC arm), median OS and 3-year OS were 15.7 months and 37.5% for the EP arm, and 16.8 months and 7.5% for the PC arm, respectively (p = 0.243). The incidence of grade ≥ 3 radiation pneumonitis was higher in the PC arm (17.5% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.014) with 5 radiation pneumonitis related deaths, while the incidence of grade 3 esophagitis was numerically higher in the EP arm (25.8% vs. 10.0%, p = 0.078). Conclusions CCRT provided ECOG 2 patients promising outcome with acceptable toxicities. EP might be superior to PC in terms of safety profile in the setting of CCRT for ECOG 2 patients. Prospective randomized studies based on IMRT technique are warranted to validate our findings. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT01494558 . (Registered 19 December 2011).

Abstract Background Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is the standard care for inoperable early stage non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of our study was to investigate whether a prediction model based on cone‐beam CT (CBCT) plus pretreatment CT radiomics features could improve the prediction of tumor control and lung toxicity after SBRT in comparison to a model based on pretreatment CT radiomics features alone. Methods A total of 34 cases of stage I NSCLC patients who received SBRT were included in the study. The pretreatment planning CT and serial CBCT radiomics features were analyzed using the imaging biomarker explorer (IBEX) software platform. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted for the association between progression‐free survival (PFS), lung toxicity and features. The predictive capabilities of the models based on CBCT and CT features were compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results Five CBCT features and two planning CT features were correlated with disease progression. Six CBCT features and two planning CT features were related to lung injury. The ROC curves indicated that the model based on the CBCT plus planning CT features might be better than the model based on the planning CT features in predicting lung injury. The other ROC curves indicated that the model based on the planning CT features was similar to the model based on the CBCT plus planning CT features in predicting disease progression. Conclusions Both pretreatment CT and CBCT radiomics features could predict disease progression and lung injury. A model with CBCT plus pretreatment CT radiomics features might improve the prediction of lung toxicity in comparison with a model with pretreatment CT features alone. Key points Significant findings of the study: A model with cone‐beam CT radiomics features plus pre‐treatment CT radiomics features might improve the prediction of lung toxicity after SBRT in stage I NSCLC patients. What this study adds: In the prediction of PFS and lung toxicity in early‐stage NSCLC patients treated with SBRT, CBCT radiomics could be another effective method.

Abstract Background There is no consensus on the definition or recommended radiotherapy treatment of ultracentral non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we report our institution's experience in treating ultracentral lung cancer patients with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) of 60 Gy in eight fractions. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 21 ultracentral NSCLC patients treated with 60 Gy SABR in eight fractions. We defined ultracentral lung cancer as the planning target volume (PTV) directly abutting or overlapping central structures, including the proximal bronchial tree, heart, and great vessels but not the esophagus. The Kaplan‐Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS) and local control (LC). Toxicity was scored per the CTCAE v4.03. Results The median follow‐up time was 15 months, and the median OS was 15 months. The one‐ and two‐year OS rates were 87.5% and 76.6%, respectively. The one‐ and two‐year PFS rates were 71.1% and 64.0%, respectively. The one‐ and two‐year LC rates were 92.9% and 92.9%, respectively. The rate of grade 2 treatment‐related toxicities was 19.1%. There was no grade ≥ 3 treatment‐related toxicity. Conclusion SABR of 60 Gy in eight fractions is feasible for ultracentral NSCLC.

BackgroundThe oesophageal carcinoma patients show high incidence of malnutrition, which negatively affects their therapy outcome. Moreover, benefits of enteral nutrition remain to be studied in details in these patients. Therefore, we set to assess the effects of enteral nutrition on the nutritional status, treatment toxicities and survival in the oesophageal carcinoma patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).Materials and MethodsEligible patients were randomly assigned to either the experimental or control group. The patients in the experimental group were treated with a whole-course enteral nutrition management, while the control group were provided a unsystematic nutrition without setting intake goals for energy and protein. The primary endpoint was a change in body weight, while the secondary endpoints included nutrition-related haematological indicators, toxicities, completion rate of treatment and survival.ResultsA total of 222 patients were randomised to either the experimental (n=148) or control (n=74) group. Patients in the experimental group showed significantly less decrease in body weight, serum albumin and haemoglobin levels, a lower incidence rates of grade ≥3 myelosuppression and infection, and a higher completion rate of CCRT than those in the control group. While analyses of the 2 and 3 year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) did not reveal differences between these groups, we observed a significantly higher OS at 1 year (83.6% vs. 70.0%). In the subgroup analysis, patients with patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA)=C were likely to have better OS and PFS with enteral nutrition.ConclusionsIn EC patients treated with CCRT, enteral nutrition conferred positive effects on the nutritional status, treatment toxicities and prognosis, which mandate its inclusion in clinical practice.Clinical Trial RegistrationThis prospective trial has been registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02399306.

Background and objective The standard treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is radiotherapy concurrent with chemotherapy, but the survival was not satisfied. With the development of intensity modulated radiotherapy, simultaneous integrated boost technique (SIB) becomes the research direction of locally advanced NSCLC. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of SIB intensity modulated radiotherapy technique for locally advanced NSCLC. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of locally advanced NSCLC who were treated with radiotherapy by SIB technique in Peking University Cancer Hospital from June 2015 to December 2018. Kaplan-Meier method was used for analysis. Results Ninty-three patients were included in the analysis. After a median follow-up of 34.23 months, 3-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local-recurrence free survival (LRFS) and metastasis free survival (MFS) rates were 53.0%, 37.0%, 50.5% and 50.5%, respectively. The incidence of grade ≥3 esophagitis was 5.4%. There were 2 (2.2%) patients experiencing grade ≥3 radiation-related pneumonia. Conclusion Radiation with SIB intensity modulated radiotherapy technique is effective and safe for patients with locally advanced NSCLC.

Background Thymic carcinomas (TCs) are rare aggressive tumors with no standard first‐line treatment. This study was conducted to determine the optimal chemotherapy regimen for advanced TC. Methods This retrospective study included 67 patients treated for stage IV TC in 2006–2015. The primary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR) and progression‐free survival (PFS) with different chemotherapy regimens. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with PFS, including metastatic status, radiotherapy post‐chemotherapy, primary lesion resection before chemotherapy, and chemotherapy regimen. Results A total of 36 patients received a paclitaxel‐platinum regimen, 31 received a gemcitabine‐platinum regimen, 14 underwent primary lesion resection, and 33 underwent radiotherapy. ORR was 31% (11/36) and 29% (9/31) in the paclitaxel‐platinum and gemcitabine‐platinum groups, respectively (P = 0.890). Median PFS, one‐year PFS rate, and two‐year PFS rate were 7.0 months, 26%, and 6% with paclitaxel‐platinum treatment and 12 months, 48%, and 24% with gemcitabine‐platinum treatment (log‐rank P = 0.030). Median PFS, one‐year PFS rate, and two‐year PFS rate were 18.0 months, 57%, and 33% with surgical resection and 7.3 months, 31%, and 7% without resection (log‐rank P = 0.030). Median PFS, one‐year PFS rate, and two‐year PFS rate were 13.0 months, 52%, and 20% with radiotherapy and 4.3 months, 22%, and 7% without radiotherapy (log‐rank P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, metastatic status (hazard ratio [HR], 0.33, P = 0.004), surgical resection (HR, 0.32; P = 0.004), and radiotherapy (HR, 0.32; P

BackgroundHypofractionated radiotherapy (HypoRT) has been used to pursue an alternative treatment regimen for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are not eligible for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), surgery or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and has shown good local control and safety. We analyzed the feasibility of using volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) with the simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique to achieve high local control with few treatment-related toxicities.Patients and MethodsA total of 55 patients with stage I-IV NSCLC who were not candidates for SABR, surgery or CCRT were included in the present study. All patients received a prescribed dose of 60 to 66 Gy in 15 fractions. Local progression-free survival (LPFS), PFS, overall survival (OS), and toxicities were retrospectively analyzed.ResultsThirty-three patients (60.0%) had stage IV or recurrent disease in this study. The median follow-up time was 8 months (interquartile range: 5.0-16.3 months). The 1-year and 2-year OS rates were 84.3% and 69.9%, and the 1-year and 2-year LPFS rates were 91.0% and 63.0%. The median OS (mOS) and median LPFS (mLPFS) were not reached, and median PFS (mPFS) was 15 months. Twenty-eight (51.9%) patients had disease progression at the time of analysis. Of these, 7 (13.0%), 7 (13.0%) and 21 (38.9%) had local recurrence, locoregional failure and distant metastasis, respectively. All cases of local recurrence were found within the SIB region. Four patients had grade 2-3 pneumonitis, and 8 patients had grade 2-3 esophagitis. Patients with grade 2-3 esophagitis had significantly higher maximum dose and dose to 5 cm3 volume to esophagus than those with grade 0-1 esophagitis. No grade 4 or higher toxicity was observed.ConclusionThe 60 to 66 Gy in 15 fractions RT regimen provides favorable local control and survival with well-tolerated toxicities. Hypofractionated VMAT+SIB is an alternative treatment option for patients with NSCLC who cannot tolerate standard definitive therapy.

PurposeTo identify cytokines in plasma that may predict objective response and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with chemoradiotherapy.Materials and MethodsFrom April 2016 to May 2017, thirty-one patients with locally advanced inoperable/unresectable NSCLC were included, and treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). No immune checkpoint inhibitors were administered after CCRT. Plasma from each patient was collected before radiotherapy, and 25 cytokines in the plasma were measured by Luminex or U-PLEX assays. Logistic regression and COX regression were performed to identify the predictive factors for objective response and PFS, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to compare the PFS between the groups.ResultsHigh levels of IL-13 and TNF-α, and low levels of ICAM-1, IFN-γ, and soluble PD-L1 (sPD-L1) were significantly associated with objective response (P

Purpose: In patients with esophageal cancer (EC), intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) improves dose sparing to the heart and lung, with some evidence showing clinical benefit. Herein, we report our cumulative clinical experience with the use of IMRT for EC. Methods and materials: This is a retrospective analysis of 587 patients with nonmetastatic EC who were treated consecutively with IMRT from January 2004 to June 30, 2013. All patients with stage I-IVA (American Joint Committee on Cancer 2002) received concurrent chemoradiation therapy either preoperatively or definitively. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compute overall survival (OS) and locoregional recurrence-free survival and disease-free survival. The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 were used to grade acute and subacute complications. Results: The median radiation dose was 50.4 Gy in 28 daily fractions. As of July 2015, the median follow-up was 31.4 months (range, 2.9-130.7 months) for all patients and 61.8 months (range, 7.7-130.7 months) for survivors. The median OS was 38.9 months, and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 86.7%, 51.8%, and 41.2%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival rates were 77.6%, 68.2%, and 66.1%, respectively, and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 58.6%, 43.7%, and 41.4%, respectively. Outcomes for both trimodality and bimodality treated patients were better than the outcomes reported in the literature. Eight patients (1.4%) experienced grade ≥3 pneumonitis, and 74 patients (13%) developed grade ≥3 esophagitis. For patients who underwent surgery, the most common postoperative complications were pneumonia (9.6%), anastomotic leakage (11.1%), and atrial fibrillation (12.5%). Conclusions: This is the largest, single institutional study to date on the long-term outcomes of treatment with IMRT for EC. For photon-based radiation therapy, IMRT yields excellent outcomes and should be considered for the treatment of EC.

Background and objective Twice-daily radiation concurrent with chemotherapy is one of the standard methods for limited-stage small cell lung cancer. The study was to evaluate the feasibility of chemotherapy concurrent with dose-escalating twice-daily radiotherapy by simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiation therapy (SIB-IMRT) approach in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer. Methods Patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer were included, treated with twice-daily radiotherapy by SIB-IMRT concurrent with chemotherapy of etoposide plus cisplatin. Dose escalation was conducted by “classical” 3+3 methods with three patients enrolled in each dose level. The therapeutic gross tumor volume (GTV) was treated according to three consecutive dose levels i.e., 45 Gy at 1.5 Gy twice daily, 50 Gy at 1.67 Gy twice daily and 54 Gy at 1.8 Gy twice daily. The planning target volume (PTV) received a dose of 45 Gy delivered in 30 fractions of 1.5 Gy. The primary endpoints were acute toxicities. The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and loco-regional failure-free survival (LRFFS) at 1-year of follow-up. Results Twenty men and six women were included. The median age was 52 (30-68) months. 12 patients experienced grade 2 acute esophagitis, and 1 patient developed grade 3 acute esophagitis. Only 3 patients developed Grade 2 pneumonitis. Grade 3 or higher radiation-related pneumonia was not observed. None died of treatment-related causes. With median follow-up of 11.2 months (3.2-36.2 months), 1-year OS, PFS and LRFFS were 89.0%, 51.0% and 85.0%, respectively. Conclusion Dose escalation for twice-daily radiation concurrent with chemotherapy in LS-SCLC has been safely achieved up to 54 Gy for GTV using SIB-IMRT technique.

Background and objective Concurrent twice-daily radiotherapy with chemotherapy of EP regimen is one of the current standard treatments for limited-stage small cell lung cancer. However, the safely tolerated dose of standard chemotherapy for Chinese patients is not decided. This study was to evaluate the toxicity and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of etoposide and cisplatin concurrent with thoracic radiation therapy for patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer. Methods Patients with histologically proven limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) were eligible. The patients underwent thoracic radiotherapy (45 Gy, 1.5 Gy bid, 30 fractions for 3 weeks) delivered concurrently with etoposide (100 mg/m2 iv, days 1-3) and cisplatin dose escalating from the two levels ( 70 mg/m2 and 75 mg/m2 on d1). The primary endpoints were hematologic toxicities during treatment. The secondary endpoints were non-hematologic toxicities, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). According to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.0 (CTC-AE 4.0), maximum tolerant dosage (MTD) was defined as the highest safely tolerated dose at which no more than one patient out of six experiences dose-limiting toxicity (Grades 4 hematologic), with the next higher dose having at least two out of six patients experience dose-limiting toxicity. Results From January 2013 to August 2016, 20 patients were enrolled in this study. The median age was 49.5 (30-68). After the first 6 patients were enrolled in Arm 1 (70 mg/m2 on d1), one patient had Grade 4 neutropenia. Another 14 patients were enrolled in Arm 2 (75 mg/m2 on d1), one patient had Grade 4 neutropenia. The MTD was determined to be etoposide (100 mg/m2 iv, d1-d3) and cisplatin dose (75 mg/m2 on d1). 4 patients had ≥Grade 3 neutropenia and 1 patients had ≥Grade 3 acute esophagitis in Arm 1. 10 patients had ≥Grade 3 neutropenia and no patient had ≥Grade 3 acute esophagitis in Arm 2. All patients with a median follow-up time was 9.0 months, median OS and PFS were not achieved, 1-year OS and PFS were 91% and 61%, respectively. Conclusion The MTD of RT with concurrent chemotherapy of EP regimen for patients with LS-SCLC was etoposide (100 mg/m2 iv, d1-d3) and cisplatin dose (75 mg/m2 on d1).

High level evidence from randomized studies comparing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) to surgery is lacking. Although the results of pooled analysis of two randomized trials for STARS and ROSEL showed that SABR is better tolerated and might lead to better overall survival than surgery for operable clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), SABR, however, is only recommended as a preferred treatment option for early stage NSCLC patients who cannot or will not undergo surgery. We, therefore, are waiting for the results of the ongoing randomized studies [Veterans affairs lung cancer surgery or stereotactic radiotherapy in the US (VALOR) and the SABRTooth study in the United Kingdom (SABRTooths)]. Many retrospective and case control studies showed that SABR is safe and effective (local control rate higher than 90%, 5 years survival rate reached 70%), but there are considerable variations in the definitions and staging of lung cancer, operability determination, and surgical approaches to operable lung cancer (open vs video-assisted). Therefore, it is difficult to compare the superiority of radiotherapy and surgery in the treatment of early staged lung cancer. Most studies demonstrated that the efficacy of the two modalities for early staged lung cancer is equivalent; however, due to the limited data, the conclusions from those studies are difficult to be evidence based. Therefore, the controversies will be focusing on the safety and invasiveness of the two treatment modalities. This article will review the ongoing debate in light of these goals.

Background and objective Osteosarcoma is the most frequent primary cancer of bone. The incidence is higher in adolescents. Large improvement, though, has been made in the treatment of osteosarcoma under the framework of multidisciplinary team, an important prognostic factor for osteosarcoma is pulmonary metastasis. Surgical resection of lung metastases is widely accepted as the optimal modality in osteosarcoma patients. Undoubtedly, surgical resection of lung metastases is widely accepted as the optimal modality in osteosarcoma patients. However, since current conceptions within the surgical approach to lung metastasectomy involve multidisciplinary collaboration, which are highly variable,there is not neither consensus nor standardized practice patterns. We conduct a survey aiming to reveal areas of consistency in current clinical practice on lung metastasectomy among Chinese osteosarcoma high volume centers. Methods A questionnaire survey specific to the nationwide high volume centers of osteosarcoma was conducted from September 2015 to November 2015. Analyses were stratified by hospital, working duration, case volume and medical discipline. Results Of 150 invited physicians, 105 participated, resulting in an overall response rate of 70%. Forty-one percent of the responded physicians agreed with the statement that orthopedic oncology should play a predominant role in the multidisciplinary team. More than 64% of respondents chose metastasectomy as the preferred local control approach, and up to 78.1% of respondents recommended pulmonary metastasectomy for patients. Compared with orthopedic surgeons, other physicians were significantly more likely to report not advocating pulmonary metastasectomy in their practice (ORothers=0.02; 95%CI: 0.00-0.22; P=0.001), and thoracic surgeons were more likely to decide metastasectomy according to indications rather than the number limit of metastases (ORthoracic surgeons=20.93; 95%CI: 2.05-213.64; P=0.001). For the most preferred radiographic evaluation option, approximately 83% of respondents reported diagnostic use of computed tomography (CT). More than 70% of respondents reported that chest CT follow-up should be 3 months after the primary site resection; approximately 68% deemed the diagnostic accuracy of CT about 90%; most respondents (92%) recommended the extrapulmonary imaging evaluation simultaneously. Around 46% of respondents reported that survival duration longer than 6 months after pulmonary metastasectomy is beneficial. Conclusion This study offers new information about the variability in the reported management of pulmonary metastatic osteosarcoma in China, reflecting the deficiencies in unified practice patterns. The results of this survey also provide baseline data for future research and for the development of international guidelines.

Background and objective With the rapid development of technology, stereotactic radiotherapy has been widely used. In a cohort of medically operable non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) survival rates “potentially equivalent to those of surgery” have been reported. Removing the field flattening filter, Clinac is capable of delivering dose rates much higher than conventional linac as well as reducing the treatment time. The goals of this work were to report safety and efficacy of SBRT treatment using a flattening filter-free model for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with small lesions. Methods From December 2011 to December 2013, 31 NSCLC patients who were T1-2N0M0, solitary pulmonary recurrence after surgery, and stage IV with oligo metastasis were enrolled, receiving SBRT treatment (60 Gy/8 f or 48 Gy/4 f) applying a flattening filter-free model. Results Compared with conventional technique, flattening filter-free model shortened the treating time with equivalent target dose and normal tissue dose. The median follow-up time is 19.4 mo. The 1-yr local control, regional control, distant control, progression free survival and overall survival rates were 96.8%, 96.8%, 83.9%, 77.4% and 96.8%. The most common side effects were radiation pneumonitis (29% grade 1, 3.2% grade 2) and chest pain (12.9% grade 1, 6.5% grade 2). Conclusion The use of flattening filter-free model in SBRT for small lesions of NSCLC patients is safe and effective. Long time follow-up and additional studies are still needed to validate our conclusions.

Introduction: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the standard treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC), but is associated with poor chest tumor control. Here we report results of a randomized phase 3 study comparing two CCRT regimens in improving chest tumor control by low-dose paclitaxel chemoradiation for LA-NSCLC. Methods: Due to the logistics of local referral pattern, the study was designed to enroll patients with stage III LA-NSCLC who had completed 2-4 cycles of full-dose chemotherapy. One hundred thirty four were randomized to either Arm 1 (paclitaxel at 15 mg/m2, three times/wk [M, W, F] for 6 weeks, n=74), or Arm 2 (weekly paclitaxel at 45 mg/m2 for 6 weeks, n=60). Chest RT was 60-70 Gy in standard fractionation. Response rate was the primary endpoint, with recurrence-free survival (RFS) as the secondary endpoint. Results: From March 2006 to February 2013, seventy-one patients completed Arm 1 treatment, and 59 completed Arm 2 treatment. The response rate for Arm 1 was significantly higher (83.1%) than Arm 2 (54.2%) (p＝0.001). RFS was superior in Arm 1: median 14.6 months vs. 9.4 months, p=0.005, Hazard ratio (HR) 1.868 (95% CI 1.203, 2.901). Overall survival was not significantly different: median 32.6 months in Arm 1 vs. 31.3 months in Arm 2, p = 0.91, HR 0.969 (95% CI 0.552, 1.703). Toxicity was significantly lower in Arm 1 for grade 3 and 4 leucopenia/neutropenia (p

Background and objective The presence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations is predictive of a better response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) and initial chemotherapy in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study is to analyze the association between the EGFR mutations and the outcome of combined chemoradiotherapy in stage III non-squamous NSCLC. Methods Patients with stage III non-squamous NSCLC whose EGFR mutation status had been identified were retrospectively analyzed. The response of 87 patients to combined chemoradiotherapy, the two-year survival rate, and the response of 128 patients to initial chemotherapy were evaluated. Results The response rate to combined chemoradiotherapy was 84.6% (33/39) in EGFR mutation-positive patients, significantly higher than the 56.3% (27/48) response rate in EGFR mutation-negative patients (P=0.004). Two-year survival rates were 53.8% and 50% in EGFR mutation-positive and mutation-negative patients, respectively. There was no significant difference in the overall survival for both patient groups. The overall response rate to initial chemotherapy was 34.5% (19/55) in EGFR mutation-positive patients, compared with the 21.9% (16/73) response rate in EGFR mutation-negative patients. Conclusion EGFR mutation-positive status can predict better response to combined chemoradiotherapy, but is not associated with overall survival in patients with stage III non-squamous NSCLC.

Background and objective Although the guidelines of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network of USA recommend that the standard therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LANSCLC) is concurrent chemoradiotherapy. There is ongoing controversy about the treatment regimen which combines chemotherapy concurrently with radiotherapy. The aim of this study is to compare weekly usage with triple weekly usage of paclitaxel in concurrent radiochemotherapy for patients with LANSCLC, and to obtain the best paclitaxel regimen in the concurrent radiochemotherapy. Methods From April 2006 to April 2009, some LANSCLC patients in multicenter were randomly divided into weekly usage (45 mg/m2, 1 times/week, a total of 270 mg/m2 in six weeks) and triple weekly usage (15 mg/m2, 3 times/week, a total of 270 mg/m2 in six weeks) group of paclitaxel by a random number table. All patients were treated with 3D radiotherapy, and 95% planning target volume (PTV) received a prescription dose of (60-70) Gy/(30-35)times/(6-7)weeks, (1.8-2.0) Gy/fraction. Then the side effects, response and overall survival rate were compared between two groups of patients. Results Thirty-eight LANSCLC patients were enrolled. Weekly usage and triple weekly usage group were 20 and 18 patients, respectively. In the triple weekly usage group, the side effects were 12 patients had radiation esophagitis of I-II degree, 1 patient had radiation esophagitis of III degree, 2 patients had radiation pneumonitis of I degree, 1 patient had radiation pneumonitis of II degree, 1 patient had radiation pneumonitis of III degree and died of respiratory failure, 2 patients developed weight loss of I degree. In the weekly usage group, the side effects were 11 patients had radiation esophagitis of I-III degree, 6 patients had radiation pneumonitis of II-III degree, 2 patients developed weight loss of I degree, 6 patients developed leucopenia of III-IV degree. The response rate of two groups was 88.8% and 50.0%, respectively (P=0.026). 1-year survival rate of two groups was 79% and 67%, respectively (P=0.607). Conclusion Although the preliminary results did not show the merits of survival in triple weekly usage, but preliminary results show that triple weekly usage was more safe and effective than weekly usage of paclitaxel in concurrent radiochemotherapy for patients with LANSCLC.