Search

In this study we focus on the retrieval of aerosol and trace gas vertical profiles from multi-axis differential optical absorption spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS) observations for the first time over Thessaloniki, Greece. We use two independent inversion algorithms for the profile retrievals: the Mexican MAX-DOAS Fit (MMF) and the Mainz Profile Algorithm (MAPA). The former is based on the optimal estimation method (OEM), while the latter follows a parameterization approach. We evaluate the performance of MMF and MAPA, and we validate their retrieved products with ancillary data measured by other co-located reference instruments. The trace gas differential slant column densities (dSCDs), simulated by the forward models, are in good agreement, except for HCHO, where larger scatter is observed due to the increased spectral noise of the measurements in the UV. We find an excellent agreement between the tropospheric column densities of NO2 retrieved by MMF and MAPA (slope=1.009, Pearson's correlation coefficient R=0.982) and a good correlation for the case of HCHO (R=0.927). For aerosols, we find better agreement for the aerosol optical depths (AODs) in the visible (i.e., at 477 nm) compared to the UV (at 360 nm), and we show that the agreement strongly depends on the O4 scaling factor that is used in the analysis. The agreement for NO2 and HCHO near-surface concentrations is similar to the comparison of the integrated columns with slightly decreased correlation coefficients. The seasonal mean vertical profiles that are retrieved by MMF and MAPA are intercompared, and the seasonal variation in all species along with possible sources is discussed. The AODs retrieved by the MAX-DOAS are validated by comparing them with AOD values measured by a CIMEL sun photometer and a Brewer spectrophotometer. Four different flagging schemes were applied to the data in order to evaluate their performance. Qualitatively, a generally good agreement is observed for both wavelengths, but we find a systematic bias from the CIMEL sun photometer and Brewer spectrophotometer measurements, due to the limited sensitivity of the MAX-DOAS in retrieving information at higher altitudes, especially in the UV. An in-depth validation of the aerosol vertical profiles retrieved by the MAX-DOAS is not possible since only in very few cases is the true aerosol profile known during the period of study. However, we examine four cases, where the MAX-DOAS provided a generally good estimation of the shape of the profiles retrieved by a co-located multi-wavelength lidar system. The NO2 near-surface concentrations are validated against in situ observations, and the comparison of both MMF and MAPA revealed good agreement with correlation coefficients of R=0.78 and R=0.73, respectively. Finally, the effect of the O4 scaling factor is investigated by intercomparing the integrated columns retrieved by the two algorithms and also by comparing the AODs derived by MAPA for different values of the scaling factor with AODs measured by the CIMEL sun photometer and the Brewer spectrophotometer.

This work aims to assess differences in the aerosol optical depth (AOD) trend estimations when using high quality AOD measurements from two different instruments with different technical characteristics, operational (e.g. measurement frequency), calibration and processing protocols. The different types of Sun photometers are the CIMEL that is part of AERONET (AErosol RObotic NETwork) and a precision Filter Radiometer (PFR), part of the Global Atmosphere Watch Precision Filter Radiometer network. The analysis operated for two wavelengths (500/501 nm and 870/862 nm for CIMEL/PFR) in Davos, Switzerland, for the period 2007–2019. For the synchronous AOD measurements, more than 95 % of the CIMEL-PFR AOD differences are within the WMO accepted limits, showing very good measurement agreement and homogeneity in calibration and post correction procedures. AOD trends per decade in AOD for Davos for the 13-year period of analysis were approximately -0.017 and -0.007 per decade for 501 nm and 862 nm (PFR), while the CIMEL-PFR trend differences have been found 0.0005 and 0.0003 respectively. The linear trend difference for 870/862 nm is larger than the linear fit standard error. When calculating monthly AODs using all PFR data (higher instrument frequency) and comparing them with the PFR measurements that are synchronous with CIMEL, the trend differences are smaller than the standard error. The trend differences are also larger than the trend uncertainty attributed to the instrument measurement uncertainty, with the exception of the comparison between the 2 PFR datasets (high and low frequency) at 862 nm. Finally, when calculating time-varying trends, they differ within their uncertainties.

In this study we focus on the retrieval of aerosol and trace gas vertical profiles from Multi-Axis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS) observations for the first time over Thessaloniki, Greece. We use two independent inversion algorithms for the profile retrievals: The Mexican MAX-DOAS Fit (MMF) and the Mainz Profile Algorithm (MAPA). The former is based on the Optimal Estimation Method (OEM), while the latter follows a parameterization approach. We evaluate the performance of MMF and MAPA and we validate their retrieved products with ancillary data measured by other co-located reference instruments. We find an excellent agreement between the tropospheric column densities of NO2 retrieved by MMF and MAPA (Slope = 1.009, Pearson's correlation coefficient R = 0.982) and a good correlation for the case of HCHO (R = 0.927). For aerosols, we find better agreement for the aerosol optical depths (AODs) in the visible (i.e., at 477 nm), compared to the UV (360 nm) and we show that the agreement strongly depends on the O4 scaling factor that is used in the analysis. The trace gas differential slant column densities (dSCDs), simulated by the forward models, are also in good agreement, except for HCHO, where larger scatter is observed due to the increased spectral noise of the measurements in the UV. The agreement for NO2 and HCHO surface concentrations is similar to the comparison of the integrated columns with slightly decreased correlation coefficients. The AODs retrieved by the MAX-DOAS are validated by comparing them with AOD values measured by a CIMEL sun-photometer and a Brewer spectrophotometer. Four different flagging schemes were applied to the data in order to evaluate their performance. Qualitatively, a generally good agreement is observed for both wavelengths, but we find a systematic bias from the CIMEL and Brewer measurements, due to the limited sensitivity of the MAX-DOAS in retrieving information at higher altitudes, especially in the UV. An in-depth validation of the aerosol vertical profiles retrieved by the MAX-DOAS is not possible since only in very few cases the true aerosol profile is known during the period of study. However, we examine four cases, where the MAX-DOAS provided a generally good estimation of the shape of the profiles retrieved by a co-located multi-wavelength lidar system. The NO2 surface concentrations are validated against in situ observations and the comparison of both MMF and MAPA revealed good agreement with correlation coefficients of R = 0.78 and R = 0.73, respectively. Finally, the effect of the O4 scaling factor is investigated by intercomparing the integrated columns retrieved by the two algorithms and also by comparing the AODs derived by MAPA for different values of the scaling factor with AODs measured by the CIMEL and the Brewer.