Search

Task-level goals such as maintaining standing balance are achieved through coordinated muscle activity. Consistent and individualized groupings of synchronously activated muscles can be estimated from muscle recordings in terms of motor modules or muscle synergies, independent of their temporal activation. The structure of motor modules can change with motor training, neurological disorders, and rehabilitation, but the central and peripheral mechanisms underlying motor module structure remain unclear. To assess the role of peripheral somatosensory input on motor module structure, we evaluated changes in the structure of motor modules for reactive balance recovery following pyridoxine-induced large-fiber peripheral somatosensory neuropathy in previously collected data in four adult cats. Somatosensory fiber loss, quantified by postmortem histology, varied from mild to severe across cats. Reactive balance recovery was assessed using multidirectional translational support-surface perturbations over days to weeks throughout initial impairment and subsequent recovery of balance ability. Motor modules within each cat were quantified by non-negative matrix factorization and compared in structure over time. All cats exhibited changes in the structure of motor modules for reactive balance recovery after somatosensory loss, providing evidence that somatosensory inputs influence motor module structure. The impact of the somatosensory disturbance on the structure of motor modules in well-trained adult cats indicates that somatosensory mechanisms contribute to motor module structure, and therefore may contribute to some of the pathological changes in motor module structure in neurological disorders. These results further suggest that somatosensory nerves could be targeted during rehabilitation to influence pathological motor modules for rehabilitation. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Stable motor modules for reactive balance recovery in well-trained adult cats were disrupted following pyridoxine-induced peripheral somatosensory neuropathy, suggesting somatosensory inputs contribute to motor module structure. Furthermore, the motor module structure continued to change as the animals regained the ability to maintain standing balance, but the modules generally did not recover pre-pyridoxine patterns. These results suggest changes in somatosensory input and subsequent learning may contribute to changes in motor module structure in pathological conditions.

Objective A major barrier to reducing falls among users of lower limb prostheses (LLP) has been an absence of statistical indices required for clinicians to select and interpret scores from performance-based clinical tests. The study aimed to derive estimates of reliability, measurement error, and minimal detectable change values in performance-based clinical tests administered to unilateral LLP users. Methods A total of 60 unilateral LLP users were administered the Narrowing Beam Walking Test, Timed ``Up and Go'' (TUG), Four Square Step Test (FSST), and 10-Meter Walk Test on 2 occasions, 3 to 9 days apart. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to assess interrater and test-retest reliability, while standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC90) were derived to establish estimates of measurement error in individual scores or changes in score for each test. Results Interrater reliability ICCs (1,1) were high for all tests (ie, ≥0.98). Test-retest ICCs (2,1) varied by test, ranging from .88 for the TUG to .97 for the FSST. SEM and MDC90 varied between .39 and .96 and between .91 seconds and 2.2 seconds for the time-based tests (FSST, TUG, 10-Meter Walk Test). SEM and MDC90 for the Narrowing Beam Walking Test were .07 and .16, respectively. Conclusion With the exception of the TUG, studied tests had test-retest ICCs (2,1) that exceeded the minimum required threshold to be considered suitable for group- and individual-level applications (ie, ICC ≥ 0.70 and ≥ 0.90, respectively). Future research on individuals with dysvascular and transfemoral amputations or in specific age categories is required. Impact Along with published validity indices, these reliability, error, and change indices can help clinicians select balance tests suitable for LLP users. They can also help clinicians interpret test scores to make informed, evidence-based clinical decisions.

Valid comparisons of muscle strength between individuals or legs that differ in size requires normalization, often by simple anthropometric variables. Few studies of muscle strength in lower-limb prosthesis users have normalized strength data by any anthropometric variable, potentially confounding our understanding of strength deficits in lower-limb prosthesis users. The objective of this pilot study was to determine the need for as well as effectiveness and impact of normalizing hip strength in lower-limb prosthesis users.Peak isometric hip extension and abduction torques were collected from 28 lower-limb prosthesis users. Allometric scaling was used to determine if hip torque values were significantly associated with, and therefore needed to be adjusted for, body mass, thigh length, or body mass x thigh length, and whether normalization was effective in reducing any associations. Between limb differences in peak hip torque, and correlations with balance ability, were inspected pre- and post-normalization.Hip torques were consistently and significantly associated with body-mass x thigh length. Associations between peak hip torque and body-mass x thigh length were reduced by normalization. After normalization by body-mass x thigh length, between limb differences in hip extension torque, as well as the correlation between hip abduction torque and balance ability, changed from non-significant to significant.In the absence of normalization, hip strength (i.e., peak torque) in lower-limb prosthesis users remains dependent on basic anthropometric variables, masking relationships between hip strength and balance ability, as well as between limb differences.

Practice effects have been observed among performance-based clinical tests administered to prosthesis-users. Their impact on test applications remains unknown.To determine whether scoring a clinical balance test using conventional procedures that do not accommodate practice effects reduces its diagnostic accuracy relative to scoring it using recommended procedures that do accommodate practice effects.Cross-sectional study.Narrowing Beam Walking Test data from 40 prosthesis users was scored using recommended methods (i.e. average of trials 3-5) and conventional methods applied to other tests (i.e. mean or best of trials 1-3). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for each method was compared to 0.50, to determine if it was better than chance at identifying prosthesis-users with a history of falls, and to 0.80, to determine if it surpassed a threshold recommended for diagnostic accuracy.Receiver operating characteristic curve area decreased when the Narrowing Beam Walking Test was scored using conventional rather than recommended procedures. Furthermore, when scored using conventional procedures, the NBWT no longer discriminated between prosthesis-users with and without a history of falls with a probability greater than chance, or exceeded recommended diagnostic thresholds.Scoring the Narrowing Beam Walking Test using conventional procedures that do not accommodate practice effects decreased its diagnostic accuracy among prosthesis-users relative to recommended procedures. Conventional scoring procedures may limit the effectiveness of performance-based tests used to screen for fall risk in prosthesis-users because they do not mitigate practice effects. The influence of practice effects on other tests, and test applications (e.g. clinical evaluation and prediction), is warranted.Scoring a clinical balance test using conventional procedures that do not mitigate practice effects reduced its diagnostic accuracy. Changing administration and scoring procedures to accommodate practice effects should be considered to improve the diagnostic accuracy of other performance-based balance tests.

Falls to the side are associated with significant morbidity, including increased risk of hip and radius fracture. Although step width variability, as measured by standard deviation, has been hypothesized to be associated with falls to the side, there is little supporting evidence. The extent to which such a relationship could be reliably established, however, is dependent on the accuracy with which step width, and thus step width variability, is measured. It has been reported that 400 consecutive steps are required to accurately estimate step width of young adults during treadmill walking. The degree to which this requirement generalizes to other populations has not been determined. Here, a secondary analysis of step width time series data from 19 middle-age women during treadmill walking revealed that 400 steps were insufficient to accurately estimate step width or step width variability for the majority of the women sampled. Patterns observed in the data suggest the potential influence of confounding factors including acclimatization to the task and fatigue during the protocol. The results suggest that the minimum number of steps previously reported as necessary to accurately assess step width and step width variability of young adults during treadmill walking is not valid for middle-age women. Furthermore, the results point to the potential value of reproducing and/or extending the original experiment that established 400 consecutive steps as necessary to accurately estimate step kinematics among young adults.

Background More than 50% of lower limb prosthesis (LLP) users report falling at least once a year, placing them at high risk for adverse health outcomes such as decreased mobility and diminished quality of life. Efforts to decrease falls in LLP users have traditionally focused on developing clinical tests to assess fall risk, designing prosthetic components to improve patient safety, and identifying risk factors to recognize potential fallers. Little attention has been directed toward recording, reporting, and characterizing the circumstances of falls in LLP users. Identifying the most common types of falls could help guide and prioritize clinical and research needs. Objective To characterize the frequency and circumstances of falls reported by unilateral LLP users. Design Secondary analysis of data from 2 cross-sectional studies. Setting Outpatient clinic and research laboratory. Participants Ambulatory unilateral transtibial and transfemoral LLP users (N = 66). Intervention None. Outcome A fall-type classification framework was developed based on biomechanical theory and published falls terminology. Self-reported falls and accompanying narrative descriptions of LLP users’ falls in the previous 12 months were analyzed with the framework. Frequencies, estimated proportions, and estimated counts were compared across fall circumstances using 95% confidence intervals. Results Thirty-eight participants (57.6%) reported 90 falls during the previous year. All reported falls were successfully categorized using the proposed framework. Most falls occurred from disruptions to the base of support, intrinsic destabilizing factors, and a diverse set of fall patterns. Walking on level terrain was the most common activity at the time of a fall. Conclusion This secondary analysis showed that falls remain frequent in ambulatory LLP users and that clinicians and researchers might wish to prioritize falls owing to disruptions of the base of support that occur while walking. Additional research with a larger sample is required to confirm and expand these results. Level of Evidence III

To explore lived experiences, and identify common themes as well as vocabulary associated with fall-related events in lower limb prosthesis (LLP) users.Five focus groups of LLP users from across the United States were conducted remotelyFocus group participants (n = 25) described experiences associated with fall-related events that resulted in the identification of six themes: (1) memories of fall-related events are shaped by time and context, (2) location and ground conditions influence whether falls occur, (3) some activities come with more risk, (4) fall-related situations are multi-faceted, and often involve the prosthesis, (5) how LLP users land, but not the way they go down, tends to vary, and (6) not all falls affect LLP users, but some near-falls do.Consideration for where LLP users fall, what they are doing when they fall, how they fall, what occurs as a result of a fall, and how well memory of a fall persists may enhance recording and reporting of falls, contribute to development of improved fall risk assessment tools, and inspire the design and function of prosthetic componentry for patient safety.Implications for rehabilitationFalls are a common problem in lower limb prosthesis (LLP) users that can lead to adverse health outcomes.Concerns over near falls, not just falls, may merit greater attention from rehabilitation professionals.Elements of the lived experience that appear unique to LLP users include the role of prosthetic fit, function, and comfort in losing and/or recovering balance; as well as the tendency of LLP users to modify rather than stop or avoid activities associated with falls.

Objective Falls are a frequent and costly concern for lower limb prosthesis (LLP) users. At present, there are no models that clinicians can use to predict the incidence of future falls in LLP users. Assessing who is at risk for falls, therefore, remains a challenge. The purpose of this study was to test whether easily accessible clinical attributes and measurements predict the incidence of future falls in LLP users. Methods In this prospective observational study, a secondary analysis of data from 60 LLP users was conducted. LLP users reported the number of falls that they recalled over the past year before prospectively reporting falls over a 6-month observation period via monthly telephone calls. Additional candidate predictor variables were recorded at baseline. Negative binomial regression was used to develop a model intended to predict the incidence of future falls. Results The final model, which included the number of recalled falls (incidence rate ratio = 1.13; 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.28) and Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility T-scores (incidence rate ratio = 0.949; 95% CI = 0.90 to 1.01), was significantly better than a null model at predicting the number of falls over the next 6 months (χ22 = 9.76) and fit the observed prospective fall count data (χ256 = 54.78). Conclusion The number of recalled falls and Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility T-scores predicted the incidence of falls over the next 6 months in established, unilateral LLP users. The success and simplicity of the final model suggests that it may serve as a screening tool for clinicians to use for assessing risk of falls. Additional research to validate the proposed model in an independent sample of LLP users is needed. Impact Owing to its simplicity, the final model may serve as a suitable screening measure for clinicians to ascertain an initial evaluation of fall risk in established unilateral LLP users. Analyzing falls data as counts rather than as a categorical variable may be an important methodological consideration for falls prevention research.

Background Performance-based tests are viewed as a gold standard for measuring physical capability. Practice effects, however, may threaten their predictive, discriminative, and evaluative applications. Despite these potential consequences, practice effects have received limited attention in users of lower limb prostheses (LLP). Objective To perform an initial characterization of the occurrence, time-course, and magnitude of practice effects in three performance-based tests administered to users of LLP. Design Secondary analysis of data from a multisite repeated-measures study. Setting Outpatient clinic and research laboratory. Participants Convenience sample of established ambulatory users of unilateral transtibial and transfemoral prostheses (n = 60). Intervention Not applicable. Main outcome measures Practice effects were identified as significant changes in slope of participants' cumulative trial-by-trial records. The occurrence, time-course, and magnitude of practice effects were computed for the Timed Up and Go (TUG), Four Square Step Test (FSST), and the 10-m Walk Test (10mWT). Results Across tests, practice effects were observed in 45% to 76% of participants. The proportion of participants with practice effects (ie, occurrence) was significantly greater for the FSST than the 10mWT (P = .008). The median number of trials (ie, time-course) required for participants to reach a consistent level of performance was not significantly different between tests (FSST: 4 trials, TUG: 4 trials; 10mWT: 3.5 trials; P = .481). Practice effect magnitude (ie, difference between the mean of trials during the plateau and best performance over the first two trials) was significantly greater than zero for the FSST (1.6 s; 16%) and TUG (1.4 s; 13%) (P Conclusion Results indicate that the FSST, TUG, and 10mWT were susceptible to practice effects in this sample of users of LLP. Practice effects may obscure significant differences in walking and balance ability, and thereby, in the absence of modifications, limit the use of these tests for making individual patient clinical decisions and analyzing group-level data.

Healthy aging modifies neuromuscular control of dynamic balance. Challenging tasks could amplify such modifications, providing clinical insights. We examined the effects of age and walking condition difficulty on neuromuscular control of walking balance. We analyzed whole-body kinematics and activity of 13 right leg and trunk muscles in 17 young (11 males and 6 females; age 24 ± 3 years) and 14 older adults (3 males and 11 females; age 69 ± 4 years) while walking on a taped line on the floor and a 6-cm wide beam. Spatiotemporal parameters of gait, margin of stability, motor performance, and muscle synergies were estimated. Regardless of age, maintaining walking balance was more difficult on the beam compared to the taped line as evidenced by a shorter distance walked (17.3%), a reduction in step length (5.8%) and speed (10.3%), as well as a 40.0% smaller margin of stability during beam vs. tape walking. The number of muscle synergies was also higher during beam vs. tape walking. Compared to younger adults, older adults had larger margin of stability during beam walking. Older adults also had higher muscle co-activity within each muscle synergy and greater variance accounted for by the first muscle synergy regardless of condition. Such age-effects may be interpreted as a safer, less efficient, and less complex neuromuscular modular control strategy. In conclusion, beam walking increased the difficulty of maintaining walking balance and induced adaptations in modular control. It seems that healthy older adults reduce the complexity and efficiency of neuromuscular control of walking to preserve walking balance.

Is there a neuromuscular basis for falls? If so, it may provide new insight into falls and their assessment and treatment. We hypothesized that falls and recoveries from a laboratory-induced slip would be characterized by differences in multimuscle coordination patterns. Using muscle synergy analysis, we identified different multimuscle coordination patterns between older adults who fell and those who recovered from a laboratory-induced “feet-forward” slip. Participants who fell recruited fewer muscle synergies than participants who recovered. This suggests that a fall may result from recruitment of an inadequate number of muscle synergies to produce the necessary mechanical functions required to maintain balance. Participants who fell also recruited different muscle synergies, including one with high levels of coactivity consistent with a startle-like response. These differences in multimuscle coordination between slip outcomes were not accompanied by differences in slip difficulty or gait kinematics before or during the slip response. The differences in neuromuscular control may therefore reflect differences in sensorimotor control rather than kinematic constraints imposed by the slip, or the musculoskeletal system. Further research is required to test the robustness of these results and their interpretation with respect to additional mechanical variables (e.g., joint torques, ground reaction forces), responses to other fall types (e.g., trips), and within rather than between individuals. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Do falls and recoveries possess distinct neuromuscular features? We identified differences in neuromuscular control between older adults who fell and those who recovered from a “feet-forward” slip. Differences in neuromuscular control were not accompanied by differences in gait or slip kinematics before or during the slip response, suggesting differences in sensorimotor control rather than kinematics dictated the observed differences in neuromuscular control. An analysis of additional mechanical variables is required to confirm this interpretation.

Here we examined changes in muscle coordination associated with improved motor performance after partnered, dance-based rehabilitation in individuals with mild to moderate idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. Using motor module (a.k.a. muscle synergy) analysis, we identified changes in the modular control of overground walking and standing reactive balance that accompanied clinically meaningful improvements in behavioral measures of balance, gait, and disease symptoms after 3 wk of daily Adapted Tango classes. In contrast to previous studies that revealed a positive association between motor module number and motor performance, none of the six participants in this pilot study increased motor module number despite improvements in behavioral measures of balance and gait performance. Instead, motor modules were more consistently recruited and distinctly organized immediately after rehabilitation, suggesting more reliable motor output. Furthermore, the pool of motor modules shared between walking and reactive balance increased after rehabilitation, suggesting greater generalizability of motor module function across tasks. Our work is the first to show that motor module distinctness, consistency, and generalizability are more sensitive to improvements in gait and balance function after short-term rehabilitation than motor module number. Moreover, as similar differences in motor module distinctness, consistency, and generalizability have been demonstrated previously in healthy young adults with and without long-term motor training, our work suggests commonalities in the structure of muscle coordination associated with differences in motor performance across the spectrum from motor impairment to expertise. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We demonstrate changes in neuromuscular control of gait and balance in individuals with Parkinson’s disease after short-term, dance-based rehabilitation. Our work is the first to show that motor module distinctness, consistency, and generalizability across gait and balance are more sensitive than motor module number to improvements in motor performance following short-term rehabilitation. Our results indicate commonalities in muscle coordination improvements associated with motor skill reacquisition due to rehabilitation and motor skill acquisition in healthy individuals.

Background Recent studies provide compelling evidence that recruiting a common pool of motor modules across behaviors (i.e., motor module generalization) may facilitate motor performance. In particular, motor module generalization across standing reactive balance and walking is associated with both walking speed and endurance in neurologically impaired populations (e.g., stroke survivors and individual’s with Parkinson’s disease). To test whether this phenomenon is a general neuromuscular strategy associated with well-coordinated walking and not limited to motor impairment, this relationship must be confirmed in neurologically intact adults. Research Question Is motor module generalization across standing reactive balance and walking related to walking performance in neurologically intact young adults? Methods Two populations of young adults were recruited to capture a wide range of walking performance: professionally-trained ballet dancers (i.e., experts, n = 12) and novices (n = 8). Motor modules (a.k.a. muscle synergies) were extracted from muscles spanning the trunk, hip, knee and ankle during walking and multidirectional perturbations to standing. Motor module generalization was calculated as the number of modules common to these behaviors. Walking performance was assessed using self-selected walking speed and beam-walking proficiency (i.e., distance walked on a narrow beam). Motor module generalization between experts and novices was compared using rank-sum tests and the association between generalization and walking performance was assessed using correlation analyses. Results Experts generalized more motor modules across standing reactive balance and walking than novices (p = 0.009). Across all subjects, motor module generalization was moderately associated with increased beam walking proficiency (r = 0.456, p = 0.022) but not walking speed (r = 0.092, p = 0.349). Significance Similar relationships between walking performance and motor module generalization exist in neurologically intact and impaired populations, suggesting that motor module generalization across standing reactive balance and walking may be a general neuromuscular mechanism contributing to the successful control of walking.

Background Clinicians are routinely required to make decisions about fall risk among lower limb prosthesis (LLP) users. These decisions can be guided by standardized clinical balance tests but require population- and test-specific cutoff scores and validity indices to categorize individuals as probable fallers or nonfallers on the basis of test performance. Despite the importance of cutoff scores and validity indices to clinical interpretation of clinical balance test scores, they are rarely reported for LLP users. In their absence, clinicians cannot use results from clinical balance tests to assess the likelihood of a fall by any one patient. Objective Derive cutoff scores, and associated validity indices, for clinical balance tests administered to established unilateral LLP users. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Outpatient clinic and research laboratory. Participants Established ambulatory unilateral transtibial and transfemoral prosthesis users (n = 40). Intervention Not applicable. Main outcome measure(s) Optimal cutoff scores and related validity indices (ie, area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios) were computed for five balance tests, the activities-specific balance confidence scale (ABC), timed up and go (TUG), four square step test (FSST), Berg balance scale (BBS), and narrowing-beam walking test (NBWT). Results Cutoff scores were identified for the NBWT (≤.43/1.0), TUG (≥8.17 seconds], FSST (≥8.49 seconds), BBS (≤50.5/56), and ABC (≤80.2/100). Validity indices (ie, area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios) for the NBWT, TUG, and FSST had greater diagnostic accuracy and provided more information about the probability of a fall than those for the BBS or ABC. Conclusion Performance above or below identified cutoff scores for the NBWT, FSST, and TUG provides information about potentially important shifts in the probability of falling among established unilateral LLP users. These results can serve as initial benchmarks to reduce uncertainty surrounding fall risk assessment in established unilateral LLP users but require future prospective evaluation. Level of evidence III.

How does long-term training affect the neural control of movements? Here we tested the hypothesis that long-term training leading to skilled motor performance alters muscle coordination during challenging, as well as nominal everyday motor behaviors. Using motor module (a.k.a., muscle synergy) analyses, we identified differences in muscle coordination patterns between professionally trained ballet dancers (experts) and untrained novices that accompanied differences in walking balance proficiency assessed using a challenging beam-walking test. During beam walking, we found that experts recruited more motor modules than novices, suggesting an increase in motor repertoire size. Motor modules in experts had less muscle coactivity and were more consistent than in novices, reflecting greater efficiency in muscle output. Moreover, the pool of motor modules shared between beam and overground walking was larger in experts compared with novices, suggesting greater generalization of motor module function across multiple behaviors. These differences in motor output between experts and novices could not be explained by differences in kinematics, suggesting that they likely reflect differences in the neural control of movement following years of training rather than biomechanical constraints imposed by the activity or musculoskeletal structure and function. Our results suggest that to learn challenging new behaviors, we may take advantage of existing motor modules used for related behaviors and sculpt them to meet the demands of a new behavior.

The ability to quantify differences in walking balance proficiency is critical to curbing the rising health and financial costs of falls. Current laboratory-based approaches typically focus on successful recovery of balance while clinical instruments often pose little difficulty for all but the most impaired patients. Rarely do they test motor behaviors of sufficient difficulty to evoke failures in balance control limiting their ability to quantify balance proficiency. Our objective was to test whether a simple beam-walking task could quantify differences in walking balance proficiency across a range of sensorimotor abilities. Ten experts, ten novices, and five individuals with transtibial limb loss performed six walking trials across three different width beams. Walking balance proficiency was quantified as the ratio of distance walked to total possible distance. Balance proficiency was not significantly different between cohorts on the wide-beam, but clear differences between cohorts on the mid and narrow-beams were identified. Experts walked a greater distance than novices on the mid-beam (average of 3.63±0.04m verus 2.70±0.21m out of 3.66m; p=0.009), and novices walked further than amputees (1.52±0.20m; p=0.03). Amputees were unable to walk on the narrow-beam, while experts walked further (3.07±0.14m) than novices (1.55±0.26m; p=0.0005). A simple beam-walking task and an easily collected measure of distance traveled detected differences in walking balance proficiency across sensorimotor abilities. This approach provides a means to safely study and evaluate successes and failures in walking balance in the clinic or lab. It may prove useful in identifying mechanisms underlying falls versus fall recoveries.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of fixed-width beam walking for assessing balance in lower limb prosthesis users. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Laboratory. SUBJECTS: Lower limb prosthesis users. METHODS: Participants attempted 10 walking trials on three fixed-width beams (18.6, 8.60, and 4.01 wide; 5.5 m long; 3.8 cm high). MAIN MEASURES: Beam-walking performance was quantified using the distance walked to balance failure. Heuristic rules applied to each participant’s beam-walking distance to classify each beam as “too easy,” “too hard,” or “appropriately challenging” and determine whether any single beam provided an appropriate challenge to all participants. The number of trials needed to achieve stable beam-walking performance was quantified for appropriately challenging beams by identifying the last inflection point in the slope of each participant’s trial-by-trial cumulative performance record. RESULTS: In all, 30 unilateral lower limb prosthesis users participated in the study. Each of the fixed-width beams was either too easy or too hard for at least 33% of the sample. Thus, no single beam was appropriately challenging for all participants. Beam-walking performance was stable by trial 8 for all participants and by trial 6 for 90% of participants. There was no significant difference in the number of trials needed to achieve stable performance among beams (P = 0.74). CONCLUSION: Results suggest that a clinical beam-walking test would require multiple beams to evaluate balance across a range of lower limb prosthesis users, emphasizing the need for adaptive or progressively challenging balance tests. While the administrative burden of a multiple-beam balance test may limit clinical feasibility, alternatives to ease this administrative burden are proposed.

Background Physical interactions between two people are ubiquitous in our daily lives, and an integral part of many forms of rehabilitation. However, few studies have investigated forces arising from physical interactions between humans during a cooperative motor task, particularly during overground movements. As such, the direction and magnitude of interaction forces between two human partners, how those forces are used to communicate movement goals, and whether they change with motor experience remains unknown. A better understanding of how cooperative physical interactions are achieved in healthy individuals of different skill levels is a first step toward understanding principles of physical interactions that could be applied to robotic devices for motor assistance and rehabilitation. Methods Interaction forces between expert and novice partner dancers were recorded while performing a forward-backward partnered stepping task with assigned “leader” and “follower” roles. Their position was recorded using motion capture. The magnitude and direction of the interaction forces were analyzed and compared across groups (i.e. expert-expert, expert-novice, and novice-novice) and across movement phases (i.e. forward, backward, change of direction). Results All dyads were able to perform the partnered stepping task with some level of proficiency. Relatively small interaction forces (10–30N) were observed across all dyads, but were significantly larger among expert-expert dyads. Interaction forces were also found to be significantly different across movement phases. However, interaction force magnitude did not change as whole-body synchronization between partners improved across trials. Conclusions Relatively small interaction forces may communicate movement goals (i.e. “what to do and when to do it”) between human partners during cooperative physical interactions. Moreover, these small interactions forces vary with prior motor experience, and may act primarily as guiding cues that convey information about movement goals rather than providing physical assistance. This suggests that robots may be able to provide meaningful physical interactions for rehabilitation using relatively small force levels.

Locomotor balance control mechanisms and impairments have been well described in the literature. In contrast, the role of evidence-based motor learning strategies in the recovery or restoration of locomotor balance control has received much less attention. Little is known about the efficacy of motor learning strategies to improve locomotor tasks and their unique requirements, such as lateral balance control. This study examined whether gradual versus sudden training influenced lateral balance control among unimpaired adults ( n =16) during training and 24-h transfer performance of a novel locomotor task. This was accomplished by examining the variability of whole-body frontal plane kinematics throughout training and 24-h transfer performance of asymmetric split-belt treadmill walking. Compared to sudden training, gradual training significantly reduced the challenge to lateral balance control (exhibited by a reduction in frontal plane kinematic variability) during training and during subsequent transfer task performance. These results indicate that gradual training could play an important role in restoring locomotor balance control during physical rehabilitation.

Motor learning strategies that increase practice difficulty and the size of movement errors are thought to facilitate motor learning. In contrast to this, gradual training minimizes movement errors and reduces practice difficulty by incrementally introducing task requirements, yet remains as effective as sudden training and its large movement errors for learning novel reaching tasks. While attractive as a locomotor rehabilitation strategy, it remains unknown whether the efficacy of gradual training extends to learning locomotor tasks and their unique requirements. The influence of gradual vs. sudden training on learning a locomotor task, asymmetric split belt treadmill walking, was examined by assessing whole body sagittal plane kinematics during 24 hour retention and transfer performance following either gradual or sudden training. Despite less difficult and less specific practice for the gradual cohort on day 1, gradual training resulted in equivalent motor learning of the novel locomotor task as sudden training when assessed by retention and transfer a day later. This suggests that large movement errors and increased practice difficulty may not be necessary for learning novel locomotor tasks. Further, gradual training may present a viable locomotor rehabilitation strategy avoiding large movement errors that could limit or impair improvements in locomotor performance.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the content, construct, and discriminant validity of the Narrowing Beam Walking Test (NBWT), a performance-based balance test for lower limb prosthesis users. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Research laboratory and prosthetics clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Forty unilateral transtibial and transfemoral prosthesis users. INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Content validity was examined by quantifying the percentage of participants receiving maximum or minimum scores (i.e. ceiling and floor effects). Convergent construct validity was examined using correlations between participants’ NBWT scores and scores or times on existing clinical balance tests regularly administered to lower limb prosthesis users. Known-groups construct validity was examined by comparing NBWT scores between groups of participants with different fall histories, amputation levels, amputation etiologies, and functional levels. Discriminant validity was evaluated by analyzing the area under each test’s Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: No minimum or maximum scores were recorded on the NBWT. NBWT scores demonstrated strong correlations (|r(s)|=.70‒.85) with scores/times on performance-based balance tests (Timed up and Go, Four Square Step Test, and Berg Balance Scale), and a moderate correlation (|r(s)|=.49) with the self-report Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale. NBWT performance was significantly lower among participants with a history of falls (p=.003), transfemoral amputation (p=.011), and a lower mobility level (p

Lower limb joint kinetics are among the most commonly reported values after instrumented gait analysis and are typically estimated via inverse dynamic calculations. These calculations require, among other things, the selection of a link-segment model that is representative of the subject bei

A study of spine biomechanics in a cadaver model.To quantify motion in multiple axes created by transfer methods from stretcher to operating table in the prone position in a cervical global instability model.Patients with an unstable cervical spine remain at high risk for further secondary injury until their spine is adequately surgically stabilized. Previous studies have revealed that collars have significant, but limited benefit in preventing cervical motion when manually transferring patients. The literature proposes multiple methods of patient transfer, although no one method has been universally adopted. To date, no study has effectively evaluated the relationship between spine motion and various patient transfer methods to an operating room table for prone positioning.A global instability was surgically created at C5-6 in 4 fresh cadavers with no history of spine pathology. All cadavers were tested both with and without a rigid cervical collar in the intact and unstable state. Three headrest permutations were evaluated Mayfield (SM USA Inc), Prone View (Dupaco, Oceanside, CA), and Foam Pillow (OSI, Union City, CA). A trained group of medical staff performed each of 2 transfer methods: the "manual" and the "Jackson table" transfer. The manual technique entailed performing a standard rotation of the supine patient on a stretcher to the prone position on the operating room table with in-line manual cervical stabilization. The "Jackson" technique involved sliding the supine patient to the Jackson table (OSI, Union City, CA) with manual in-line cervical stabilization, securing them to the table, then initiating the table's lock and turn mechanism and rotating them into a prone position. An electromagnetic tracking device captured angular motion between the C5 and C6 vertebral segments. Repeated measures statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the following conditions: collar use (2 levels), headrest (3 levels), and turning technique (2 levels).For all measures, there was significantly more cervical spine motion during manual prone positioning compared with using the Jackson table. The use of a collar provided a slight reduction in motion in all the planes of movement; however, this was only significantly different from the no collar condition in axial rotation. Differences in gross motion between the headrest type were observed in lateral bending (Foam PillowProne View, P=0.045), medial lateral translation (Foam PillowMayfield, P=0.032), and anterior posterior translation (Prone ViewMayfield, P=0.030).The data suggest that the manual transfer technique produces 2 to 3 times more cervical spine angular motion than the Jackson table method of transfer. The use of a collar provides significant benefit in limiting spine motion that is only observed in axial rotation. Choice of headrest does have a significant effect on the amount of motion allowed during turning, with the Foam Pillow and Prone View generally providing more effective stabilization compared with the Mayfield.

Bone mass is dramatically compromised during periods of weightlessness, inactivity, or bed rest. Animals that hibernate reduce their body temperature, heart rate and metabolic activity, and likewise lower bone turnover activity during their immobile state. Black bears Ursus americanus, however, do not hibernate, but rather overwinter by denning during which they maintain a nearly normal functional heart rate, cardiac output and temperature. Furthermore, markers of bone turnover in black bears are maintained during denning periods. Thus, the purpose of this work was to determine if the denning state of relative immobility in black bears results in changes in bone mass and bone architectural structure. Harvested forelimbs (ulna and radius) were compared between pre- and post-denning black bears using X-ray imaging, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, and micro-computed tomography to quantify total distal forelimb bone mineral density, cancellous bone mineral density, bone mineral content, bone volume fraction, degree of anisotropy, structure model index, and trabecular thickness. No significant differences in any of the measured parameters were found in comparing radius and ulna from autumn and spring bears in this cross-sectional sample, suggesting that black bears did not experience a significant change in bone mass or architecture during denning. The statistical power for detecting a significant difference (P≤ 0.05) for this sample was 0.8. The specific mechanism by which the preservation of bone was attained may be related to skeletal muscle interaction or circulating systemic hormones.

Background Deficits in balance control are one of the most common and serious mobility challenges facing individuals with lower limb loss. Yet, dynamic postural balance control among individuals with lower limb loss remains poorly understood. Here we examined the kinematics and kinetics of dynamic balance in individuals with unilateral transtibial limb loss. Methods Five individuals with unilateral transtibial limb loss, and five age- and gender-matched controls completed a series of randomly applied multi-directional support surface translations. Whole-body metrics, e.g. peak center-of-mass displacement and net center-of-pressure displacement were compared across cohorts. Stability margin was computed as the difference between peak center-of-pressure and center-of-mass displacement. Additionally, center-of-pressure and ground reaction force magnitude and direction were compared between the prosthetic, intact, and control legs. Findings Peak center-of-mass displacement and stability margin did not differ between individuals with transtibial limb loss and controls for all perturbation directions except those loading only the prosthetic leg; in such cases the stability margin was actually larger than controls. Despite similar center-of-mass displacement, greater center-of-pressure displacement was observed in the intact leg during anterior–posterior perturbations, and under the prosthetic leg in medial–lateral perturbations. Further, in the prosthetic leg, ground reaction forces were smaller and spanned fewer directions. Interpretation Deficits in balance control among individuals with transtibial limb loss may be due to their inability to use their prosthetic leg to generate forces that are equal in magnitude and direction to those of unimpaired adults. Targeting this force-generating deficit through technological or rehabilitation innovations may improve balance control.

Systematic reviews of scientific literature are valuable sources of synthesized knowledge. Systematic review results may also be used to inform readers about challenges inherent to an area of research, guide future research efforts, and facilitate improvements in evidence quality.To identify methodological issues that affected the overall level of scientific evidence reported in a contemporary systematic review and to offer suggestions for enhancing publications' contribution to the overall evidence.Secondary analysis of a systematic review.Publications included in a systematic review related to microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees were analyzed with respect to established methodological quality criteria. Common issues were identified and discussed.Internal validity was commonly affected by variable comparison conditions, limited justification of accommodation time, potential fatigue and learning effects, lack of blinding, small sample sizes, limited evidence of measurement reliability, subject attrition, and limited descriptions of selection criteria. Similarly, external validity was affected by limited descriptions of the study sample, indeterminate representativeness, and suboptimal description of the interventions.Results suggest that efforts to address methodological limitations, educate evidence consumers, and improve research reporting are needed to advance the quality and use of evidence in the field of prosthetics.Critical analysis of the strengths and limitations of publications included in a systematic review can inform evidence consumers and contributors about challenges inherent to a field of research. Results of this analysis suggest that efforts to address identified limitations are needed to enhance the overall level of prosthetics evidence.

The cognitive demand required for a range of locomotor tasks has been described for a variety of populations. However, the effect of different training strategies on the cognitive demand required while learning novel locomotor tasks is not well understood and may inform physical rehabilitation. The authors examined whether two training strategies, gradual and sudden training, influenced the cognitive demand required while practicing a novel locomotor task, asymmetric split-belt treadmill walking. Simple reaction times and whole-body kinematics were recorded throughout practice. Gradual training resulted in significantly lower reaction times during much of training, suggesting that gradual training is less cognitively demanding than sudden training, possibly due to a reduction in error feedback or movement planning demands.

Non-articulated energy storage and return prosthetic feet lack any true articulation or obvious point of rotation. This makes it difficult to select a joint center about which to estimate their kinetics. Despite this absence of any clear point of rotation, methods for estimating the kinetic performance of this class of prosthetic feet typically assume that they possess a fixed center of rotation and that its location is well approximated by the position of the contralateral lateral malleolus. To evaluate the validity of this assumption we used a finite helical axis approach to determine the position of the center of rotation in the sagittal plane for a series of non-articulated energy storage and return prosthetic feet. We found that over the course of stance phase, the sagittal finite helical axis position diverged markedly from the typically assumed fixed axis location. These results suggest that researchers may need to review center of rotation assumptions when assessing prosthetic foot kinetics, while clinicians may need to reconsider the criteria by which they prescribe these prosthetic feet.

STUDY DESIGN.: Cadaveric biomechanical study. OBJECTIVE.: To quantify spinal motion created by transfer methods from supine to prone position in a cadaveric C1-C2 global instability model. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: Patients who have sustained a spinal cord injury remain at high risk for further secondary injury until their spine is adequately stabilized. To date, no study has evaluated the effect of patient transfer methods from supine to prone position in the operating room, on atlantoaxial cervical spine motion. METHODS.: A global instability was surgically created at the C1-C2 level in 4 fresh cadavers. Two transfer protocols were tested on each cadaver. The log-roll technique entailed performing a standard 180 degrees log-roll rotation of the supine patient from a stretcher to the prone position onto the operating room Jackson table (OSI, Union City, CA). The "Jackson technique" involved sliding the supine patient to the Jackson table, securing them to the table, and then rotating them into a prone position. An electromagnetic tracking device registered motion between the C1 and C2 vertebral segments. Three different head holding devices (Mayfield, Prone view, and blue foam pillow) were also compared for their ability to restrict C1-C2 motion. Six motion parameters were tracked. Repeated measures statistical analysis was performed to evaluate angular and translational motion. RESULTS.: For 6 of 6 measures of angulation and translation, manual log-roll prone positioning generated significantly more C1-C2 motion than the Jackson table turning technique. Out of 6 motion parameters, 5 were statistically significant (P < 0.001-0.005). There was minimal difference in C1-C2 motion generated when comparing all 3 head holding devices. CONCLUSION.: The data demonstrate that manual log-roll technique generated significantly more C1-C2 motion compared to the Jackson table technique. Choice of headrest has a minimal effect on the amount of motion generated during patient transfer, except that the Mayfield device demonstrates a slight trend toward increased C1-C2 motion.

The Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART) is a Go-No-Go signal detection task developed to measure lapses of sustained conscious attention. In this study, we examined the impact global interference and spatial uncertainty has on SART performance. Ten participants performed either a SART (high-Go) or a traditionally formatted (low-Go) version of a global-local stimuli detection task with spatially certain and uncertain signals. Reaction time in the SART was insensitive to global interference and spatial uncertainty, whereas reaction time in the low-Go task was sensitive. Spatial uncertainty increased errors of omission in the SART, which was not expected if the SART measures mindlessness. There was a high correlation between participants' errors of commission rate and their reaction time in the SART. The results, overall, support the view that the SART is a better measure of response strategy than lapses in sustained attention or mindlessness.

STUDY DESIGN Biomechanical evaluation of conventional and noninvasive halos in cadaveric C1-C2 and C5-C6 instability models. OBJECTIVE To compare the ability of a conventional halo and noninvasive halo (NIH) to immobilize the unstable cervical spine at the C1-C2 and C5-C6 levels. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Many successful outcomes have been reported in cervical spine injury treatment with the conventional halo (CH); however, complications related to pin sites have been reported. The NIH was designed to overcome these complications. To date, no investigation has compared the biomechanical efficacy of the NIH with that of the CH in restricting three-dimensional cervical spine motion. METHODS A global instability was created at the C1-C2 level in 4 cadavers and at C5-C6 in 4 others. Relative motion was measured between the superior and inferior vertebrae during the donning process, execution of the log roll technique, and during the process of sitting up. This testing sequence was followed for all treatment conditions. RESULTS During the application of the orthoses there was a significant increase in motion at C1-C2 instability and a trend toward increased motion at the C5-C6 instability with CH compared with NIH. In the log roll maneuver, the CH and NIH restrict motion to a similar degree at the C1-C2 instability level, except in frontal plane translation, where CH immobilizes the segment to a greater extent. For the C5-C6 instability the CH provides significantly better immobilization for lateral bending and axial translation. No significant differences were found between the NIH and CH for the sit-up maneuver at either of the levels. CONCLUSION Donning of the NIH generates significantly less cervical spine motion than application of the CH. The CH provides superior immobilization for a C5-C6 instability during the log roll maneuver and a C1-C2 instability in the frontal plane during the log-roll maneuver. The CH and NIH immobilize the C1-C2 and C5-C6 instability to a similar degree during the sit-up maneuver.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Conventional halos (CHs) have been used since 1959 and have long been regarded as the standard for external stabilization of the injured cervical spine. Unfortunately, there use is associated with several significant complications including infection, pin loosening, dysphasia, dural and skull penetration, and pressure ulcers. Recently, a pinless noninvasive halo (NIH) (Seattle Systems/Trulife, Poulsbo, WA) was introduced with the goal of providing cervical spine stabilization and control approaching that of the CH in a less invasive fashion. The design of this orthosis could prove useful if it is found to produce the same outcomes with fewer complications than the CH. PURPOSE: To review outcomes of patients fitted with the NIH to determine its suitability for treating cervical spine injuries. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PATIENT SAMPLE: Consisted of 19 patients fitted with NIHs as inpatients and followed as outpatients at a university-based level-1 trauma center. OUTCOME MEASURES: Data on fracture alignment and healing as assessed by imaging, neurological status, treatment complications, and patient demographics were collected. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients treated for cervical trauma at a universitybased level-1 trauma center by attending surgeons was performed. Subjects were identified for the study by reviewing inpatient fitting records of the Department of Orthotics and Prosthetics. Data regarding patient demographics, tobacco use, classification of injury, surgical treatment, total time in NIH, complications, fracture alignment, and neurological status were collected. RESULTS: Average time spent in the NIH was 79 days, all fractures successfully healed in acceptable alignment, and no neurologic deterioration was noted. Complications were limited to one case of occipital ulceration, two cases of noncompliance, (loosening straps), and one case of recurrent subluxation that was later resolved. CONCLUSIONS: This study offers preliminary data to support a larger scale, randomized trial with long-term follow-up to compare the clinical efficacy of the NIH to that of CHs in patients with cervical spine trauma. Biomechanical studies of the stability of the cervical spine in the NIH, currently underway, will help to assess the suitability of the NIH as an alternative to CHs. The complications encountered do not preclude further investigation of this device and patient tolerance of this treatment has been satisfactory. 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Physical interactions between patients and therapists during rehabilitation have served as motivation for the design of rehabilitation robots, yet we lack a fundamental understanding of the principles governing such human-human interactions (HHI). Here we review the literature and pose important open questions regarding sensorimotor interaction during HHI that could facilitate the design of human-robot interactions (HRI) and haptic interfaces for rehabilitation. Based on the goals of physical rehabilitation, three subcategories of sensorimotor interaction are identified: sensorimotor collaboration, sensorimotor assistance, and sensorimotor education. Prior research has focused primarily on sensorimotor collaboration and is generally limited to relatively constrained visuomotor tasks. Moreover, the mechanisms by which performance improvements are achieved during sensorimotor cooperation with haptic interaction remains unknown. We propose that the effects of role assignment, motor redundancy, and skill level in sensorimotor cooperation should be explicitly studied. Additionally, the importance of haptic interactions may be better revealed in tasks that do not require visual feedback. Finally, cooperative motor tasks that allow for motor improvement during solo performance to be examined may be particularly relevant for rehabilitation robotics. Identifying principles that guide human-human sensorimotor interactions may lead to the development of robots that can physically interact with humans in more intuitive and biologically inspired ways, thereby enhancing rehabilitation outcomes. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1743-0003-11-142) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees (MPKs) have been developed as an alternative to non-microprocessor-controlled knees (NMPKs) to address challenges facing individuals with lower-limb loss. A body of scientific literature comparing MPKs and NMPKs exists but has yet to be critically appraised. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to examine outcomes associated with the use of these interventions among individuals with transfemoral limb loss. A search of biomedical databases identified 241 publications, of which 27 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were reviewed for methodological quality and content. We developed 28 empirical evidence statements (EESs) in 9 outcome categories (metabolic energy expenditure, activity, cognitive demand, gait mechanics, environmental obstacle negotiation, safety, preference and satisfaction, economics, and health and quality of life) based on findings in the literature. The level of evidence supporting these EESs varied due to quantity, quality, and consistency of the results. EESs supported by a moderate level of evidence that noted significant differences between MPKs and NMPKs were derived in five of the nine outcome categories. The results from this review suggest that evidence exists to inform clinical practice and that additional research is needed to confirm existing evidence and better understand outcomes associated with the use of NMPKs and MPKs.

Relatively little attention has been given to the use of well-established motor learning strategies to enable individuals with lower limb loss to effectively and safely learn to walk with their prostheses in the home and community. Traditionally, such outcomes have been pursued by focusing on the design and function of a patient's prosthesis, rather than on how he or she should learn to use it. The use of motor learning strategies may enhance physical rehabilitation outcomes among individuals with lower limb loss. This review explores these motor learning strategies and ways in which they can be applied to the physical rehabilitation of individuals with lower limb loss and highlights some of the challenges to their implementation, as well as unanswered research questions.