Search

Satellite-borne microwave imagers are often operated as “conical scanners”, which use an off-axis paraboloid antenna that spins around an Earth-directed axis. As a result, individual measurements are arranged in curved “scans” on the Earth. Each measurement footprint is generally elliptical, with a range of alignments relative to fixed directions on the Earth. Taken together, these geometrical features present a challenge for users who want collocate microwave radiances with other sources of information. These sources include maps of surface conditions (often available on a regular latitude–longitude grid), information from other satellites (which will have a different, non-aligned scan geometry), or point-like in situ information. Such collocations are important for algorithm development and validation activities. Some of these challenges associated with collocating microwave radiances would be eliminated by resampling satellite data onto circular footprints on an Earth-fixed grid. This is because circular footprints help enable accurate collocations between satellite sensors on different platforms whose native footprints are usually ellipses canted at varying angles. Here, we describe a computationally efficient method to accurately resample microwave radiances onto circular footprints, facilitating comparisons and combinations between different types of geophysical information.

In 2021, a novel NOAA-Saildrone project deployed five uncrewed surface vehicle Saildrones (SDs) to monitor regions of the Atlantic Ocean and Caribbean Sea frequented by tropical cyclones. One of the SDs, SD-1045, crossed Hurricane Sam (Category 4) on September 30, providing the first-ever surface-ocean videos of conditions in the core of a major hurricane and reporting near-surface winds as high as 40 m/s. Here, we present a comprehensive analysis and interpretation of the Saildrone ocean surface wind measurements in Hurricane Sam, using the following datasets for direct and indirect comparisons: an NDBC buoy in the path of the storm, radiometer tropical cyclone (TC) winds from SMAP and AMSR2, wind retrievals from the ASCAT scatterometers and SAR (RadarSat2), and HWRF model winds. The SD winds show excellent consistency with the satellite observations and a remarkable ability to detect the strength of the winds at the SD location. We use the HWRF model and satellite data to perform cross-comparisons of the SD with the buoy, which sampled different relative locations within the storm. Finally, we review the collective consistency among these measurements by describing the uncertainty of each wind dataset and discussing potential sources of systematic errors, such as the impact of extreme conditions on the SD measurements and uncertainties in the methodology.

The NASA CYGNSS satellite constellation measures ocean surface winds using the existing network of the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) and was designed for measurements in tropical cyclones (TCs). Here, we focus on using a consistent methodology to validate multiple CYGNSS wind data records currently available to the public, some focusing on low to moderate wind speeds, others for high winds, a storm-centric product for TC analyses, and a wind dataset from NOAA that applies a track-wise bias correction. Our goal is to document their differences and provide guidance to users. The assessment of CYGNSS winds (2017–2020) is performed here at global scales and for all wind regimes, with particular focus on TCs, using measurements from radiometers that are specifically developed for high winds: SMAP, WindSat, and AMSR2 TC-winds. The CYGNSS high-wind products display significant biases in TCs and very large uncertainties. Similar biases and large uncertainties were found with the storm-centric wind product. On the other hand, the NOAA winds show promising skill in TCs, approaching a level suitable for tropical meteorology studies. At the global level, the NOAA winds are overall unbiased at wind regimes from 0–30 m/s and were selected for a test assimilation into a global wind analysis, CCMP, also presented here.

Sea-ice contamination in the antenna field of view constitutes a large error source in retrieving sea-surface salinity (SSS) with the spaceborne Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) L-band radiometer. This is a major obstacle in the current NASA/Remote Sensing Systems (RSS) SMAP SSS retrieval algorithm in regards to obtaining accurate SSS measurements in the polar oceans. Our analysis finds a strong correlation between 8-day averaged SMAP L-band brightness temperature (TB) bias and TB measurements from the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR2) in the C-through Ka-band frequency range for sea-ice contaminated ocean scenes. We show how this correlation can be employed to develop: (1) a discriminant analysis that is able to reliably flag the SMAP observations for sea-ice contamination and (2) subsequently remove the sea-ice contamination from the SMAP observations, which results in significantly more accurate SMAP SSS retrievals near the sea-ice edge. We provide a case study that evaluates the performance of the proposed sea-ice flagging and correction algorithm. Our method is also able to detect drifting icebergs, which go often undetected in many available standard sea-ice products and thus result in spurious SMAP SSS retrievals.

Scatterometers provide very stable ocean vector wind data records. This is because they measure the ratio of backscattered to incident microwave signal over the ocean surface as opposed to an absolute quantity (e.g., emitted microwave signal). They provide an optimal source of observations for building a long ocean vector wind Climate Data Record (CDR). With this objective in mind, observations from different satellite platforms need to be assessed for high absolute accuracy versus a common ground truth and for fine cross-calibration during overlapping periods. Here we describe the methodology for developing a CDR of ocean surface winds from the C-band ASCAT scatterometers onboard MetOp-A, -B, and -C. This methodology is based on the following principles: a common Geophysical Model Function (GMF) and wind algorithm developed at Remote Sensing Systems (RSS) and the use of in situ and satellite winds to cross-calibrate the three scatterometers within the accuracy required for CDRs, about 0.1 m/s at the global monthly scale. Using multiple scatterometers and radiometers for comparison allows for the opportunity to isolate sensors that are drifting or experiencing step-changes as small as 0.05 m/s. We detected and corrected a couple of such changes in the ASCAT-A wind record. The ASCAT winds are now very stable over time and well cross-calibrated with each other. The full C-band wind CDR now covers 2007-present and can be easily extended in the next decade with the launch of the MetOp Second Generation scatterometers.

A new data set of tropical cyclone winds (‘TC-winds’) through rain as observed by the WindSat and AMSR2 microwave radiometers has been developed by making use of a linear combination of C- and X-band frequency channels. These winds, along with tropical cyclone winds from the SMAP L-band radiometer, are compared with the Hurricane Weather Research and Forecasting (HWRF) model. Due to differences in spatial scales between the satellites and the high-resolution HWRF model, resampling must be performed on the model winds before comparisons are done. Various ways of spatial resampling are discussed in detail, and an optimal method is determined. Additionally, resampled model winds must be temporally interpolated to the time of the satellite before direct comparisons are made. This interpolation can occasionally result in un-physical 2D wind fields, especially for fast-moving storms. To assist users with this problem, a methodology for handling un-physical wind features is detailed. Results of overall comparisons between the satellites and HWRF for 19 storms between 2017 and 2020 displayed consistent storm features, with overall average biases less than 1 m/s and standard deviations below 4 m/s for all tropical cyclone winds between 10 and 60 m/s. Differences were seen when the comparisons were performed separately for the Atlantic and Pacific basins, with biases and standard deviations between the satellites and HWRF showing better agreement in the Atlantic. The impact of rain on the satellite wind retrievals is discussed, and no systematic bias was seen between the three sensors, despite the fact that they use different frequency channels in their tropical cyclone winds-through-rain retrieval algorithms.

Strengths and weakness of remotely sensed winds are discussed, along with the current capabilities for remotely sensing winds and stress. Future missions are briefly mentioned. The observational needs for a wide range of wind and stress applications are provided. These needs strongly support a short list of desired capabilities of future missions and constellations.

The measurement of ocean surface wind speeds in precipitation from satellite microwave radiometers is a challenging task. Rain attenuates the signal that is emitted from the ocean surface. Moreover, the rain and wind signals are very similar, which makes it difficult to distinguish wind from rain. The rain contamination can be mitigated for radiometers that operate simultaneously at C-band and X-band channels, such as WindSat, AMSR-E and AMSR2. The basic principle is to use combinations between C-band and X-band channels that are sensitive to wind speed but relatively insensitive to rain. Based on this principle, we have developed algorithms for retrieving wind speeds in rain from the WindSat and AMSR sensors. These algorithms are statistical regressions and are trained specifically under tropical cyclone conditions. We lay out the steps of the algorithm development, training, and testing. The major source for training the algorithm is provided by wind speeds from the SMAP L-band radiometer, which have been proven to provide reliable wind speeds in strong storms and are not affected by rain. We show that the WindSat and AMSR tropical cyclone wind algorithms perform well under precipitation where standard passive wind speed retrievals fail. We examine the possibility of extending the C/X-band tropical cyclone wind algorithm to X/K-band channels and discuss how it can be broadened from tropical cyclone conditions to global winds in rain retrievals.