Search

Patients often take opioids to relieve osteoarthritis (OA) pain despite limited benefits and potential harms. This study aimed to compare cross-sectional perspectives of patients that were taking prescription opioid (N = 471) or nonopioid medications (N = 185) for OA in terms of satisfaction, expectations of effectiveness, and concerns. Patients prescribed opioids (>7 days) reported more prior treatments (2.47 vs. 1.74), greater mean pain intensity (5.47 vs. 4.11), and worse quality of life (EQ-5D-5L index value mean 0.45 vs. 0.71) than patients prescribed nonopioid medications (all p < 0.0001). Based on linear regression models adjusting for demographics and pain intensity, patients prescribed opioids were less satisfied with overall regimen (3.40 vs. 3.67, p = 0.0322), had less belief that medications were meeting effectiveness expectations (2.72 vs. 3.13, p < 0.0001), and had more concerns about treatments being “not very good” (3.66 vs. 3.22, p = 0.0026) and addiction (3.30 vs. 2.65, p < 0.0001) than patients prescribed nonopioid regimens. When the models were replicated for subgroups with ≥30 days’ medication regimen duration, the findings were consistent with the main analyses. Patients have concerns about the risk of opioid addiction, but those with greater disease burden and more prior treatments continue taking opioid regimens.

OBJECTIVE This study assessed associations between severity of, and prescription medication use for, chronic low back pain (CLBP) and health-related quality of life, health status, work productivity, and healthcare resource utilization. METHODS This cross-sectional study utilized SF-12, EQ-5D-5L, and work productivity and activity impairment (WPAI) questionnaires, and visits to healthcare providers among adults with self-reported CLBP participating in the National Health and Wellness Survey in Germany, France, UK, Italy, and Spain. Respondents were stratified into four groups according to pain severity (mild or moderate/severe) and prescription medication use (Rx-treated or Rx-untreated). Differences between groups were estimated using generalized linear models controlling for sociodemographics and health characteristics. RESULTS Of 2086 respondents with CLBP, 683 had mild pain (276 Rx-untreated, 407 Rx-treated) and 1403 had moderate/severe pain (781 Rx-untreated, 622 Rx-treated). Respondents with moderate/severe pain had significantly worse health-related quality of life (SF-12v2 physical component summary), health status (EQ-5D-5L), and both absenteeism and presenteeism compared with those with mild pain, including Rx-untreated (moderate/severe pain Rx-untreated vs. mild pain Rx-untreated, p ≤ 0.05) and Rx-treated (moderate/severe pain Rx-treated vs. mild pain Rx-treated, p ≤ 0.05) groups. Significantly more visits to healthcare providers in the last 6 months were reported for moderate/severe pain compared with mild pain for Rx-treated (least squares mean 13.01 vs. 10.93, p = 0.012) but not Rx-untreated (8.72 vs. 7.61, p = 0.072) groups. Health-related quality of life (SF-12v2 physical component summary) and health status (EQ-5D-5L), as well as absenteeism and presenteeism, were significantly worse, and healthcare utilization was significantly higher, in the moderate/severe pain Rx-treated group compared with all other groups (all p ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION Greater severity of CLBP was associated with worse health-related quality of life, health status, and absenteeism and presenteeism, irrespective of prescription medication use. Greater severity of CLBP was associated with increased healthcare utilization in prescription medication users.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease associated with itch, eczematous lesions and impaired quality of life (QoL). Although the frequency of skin pain in AD is often underestimated, it is associated with a substantial health burden, similar to itch and is known to contribute to sleep disruption and mood disturbance. Abrocitinib is an oral, once-daily, selective Janus kinase-1 inhibitor approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD. In phase 3 clinical trials JADE MONO-1 (NCT03349060) and JADE MONO-2 (NCT03575871), abrocitinib demonstrated rapid relief from itch and skin pain, as well as meaningful improvements in QoL compared with placebo. The interrelationships between abrocitinib treatment and improvements in itch, skin pain and QoL have not yet been investigated. This mediation analysis aimed to characterize the effect of abrocitinib treatment via itch and skin pain on dermatology-specific QoL in patients with AD. Data from JADE MONO-1 and JADE MONO-2 were pooled in this analysis. Adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD received abrocitinib (200 or 100 mg) as monotherapy or placebo for 12 weeks. Three separate models were evaluated whereby QoL was assessed using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score, and itch and skin pain were assessed via the Pruritus and Symptoms Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (PSAAD) items #1 (How itchy was your skin over the past 24 h?) and #2 (How painful was your skin over the past 24 h?), respectively. The cross-sectional mediation model (CSMM) was run separately at weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 using all available data at each timepoint. The longitudinal mediation model (LMM), which does not assume independence among measurements of itch, skin pain and DLQI at each timepoint, estimated relationships using all available data from all weeks simultaneously. Based on the results of the CSMM and LMM, a pseudo-steady-state model, in which the relationship among variables was assumed to be the same across timepoints, was applied. Effects with P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. In the CSMM, the indirect effect of abrocitinib on DLQI mediated via itch was considered approximately stable (24–30%) for the first 8 weeks before increasing at week 12 (42%), while the indirect effect mediated via skin pain was considered approximately stable from week 2 to week 12 (33–41%). In the LMM, the indirect effect of abrocitinib treatment on DLQI mediated via both itch and skin pain was considered approximately stable from week 2 to week 12 (17–26% and 42–48%, respectively). The cross-sectional and longitudinal models were generally consistent and indicated a pseudo-steady-state period between weeks 2 and 12. Using the pseudo-steady-state model, the direct effect of abrocitinib on DLQI was estimated to be 34.8% (P < 0.0001), and the indirect effects mediated via itch and skin pain were estimated to be 19.5% and 45.8%, respectively (P ≤ 0.0001 for both). Improvements in dermatology-specific QoL with abrocitinib are mostly mediated indirectly via a reduction in skin pain and less so by relief of itch. These findings warrant further research to examine to what extent patients consider itch and skin pain as separate concepts in terms of their impact on dermatology-specific QoL.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder characterized by intense itch, skin pain and impaired quality of life. Skin pain is a common and bothersome symptom of AD and increases in prevalence and intensity with worsening disease severity. Abrocitinib is an oral, once-daily, selective Janus kinase-1 inhibitor approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD. Abrocitinib treatment resulted in improvements in skin clearance as well as rapid itch reduction in patients with moderate-to-severe AD across multiple phase 3 studies. Work productivity loss and activity impairment were assessed in the phase 3 JADE MONO-2 (NCT03575871) trial, with greater improvements being associated with abrocitinib treatment compared with placebo. The mechanism(s) through which abrocitinib reduces work productivity loss and activity impairment are unclear. To describe the interrelationships among abrocitinib treatment, itch, skin pain, and work productivity and activity impairment using a mediation modelling analysis in patients with AD. Data from adult patients treated with abrocitinib monotherapy (200 or 100 mg) or placebo in JADE MONO-2 were included in this analysis. As separate outcomes, work productivity loss and activity impairment (outcome variables) were measured by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Atopic Dermatitis version 2.0 (WPAI-AD 2.0). Itch and skin pain (mediator variables) were evaluated using the Pruritus and Symptoms Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (PSAAD) item #1 (How itchy was your skin over the past 24 h?) and item #2 (How painful was your skin over the past 24 h?), respectively. Mediation modelling was conducted independently for work productivity loss and activity impairment. All available data at week 12 were used in the modelling. Effects with P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The direct effects of abrocitinib were estimated to be 7.3% (P = 0.779) and 17.5% (P = 0.258) on work productivity loss and activity impairment, respectively. The indirect effects of abrocitinib treatment on work productivity loss and, separately, on activity impairment mediated via itch were estimated to be 50.6% (P = 0.017) and 20.9% (P = 0.062), respectively, and via skin, pain were estimated to be 42.1% and 61.5%, respectively, (P < 0.05 for both). The indirect effect of abrocitinib treatment on work productivity loss is mediated approximately equally through the reduction in itch severity and skin pain. The effect of abrocitinib treatment on activity impairment is mostly mediated indirectly through the reduction of skin pain, along with a smaller indirect contribution from the reduction in itch. These findings support further research into the extent that patients consider itch and skin pain as separate concepts in terms of their impact on work productivity.

Opioids are often prescribed for osteoarthritis (OA) pain, despite recommendations to limit use due to minimal benefits and associated harms. This study aimed to assess physicians’ practice patterns and perceptions regarding opioids by specialty one year following the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published guidance on opioid prescribing. The 139/153 (90.8%) physicians who reported prescribing opioids in the previous year reported decreased prescribing for mild OA (51.3%, 26.5% and 33.3% of primary care physicians, rheumatologists, and orthopaedic surgeons, respectively), moderate OA (50.0%, 47.1% and 48.1%) and severe OA (43.6%, 41.2% and 44.4%). Prescribing changes were attributed to the CDC guidelines for 58.9% of primary care physicians, 59.1% of rheumatologists, and 73.3% of orthopaedic surgeons. Strong opioids were mostly reserved as third-line treatment. Although treatment effectiveness post-CDC guidelines was not assessed, perceptions of efficacy and quality of life with opioids significantly differed across specialties, whereas perceptions of safety, convenience/acceptability and costs did not. Physicians generally agreed on the barriers to opioid prescribing, with fear of addiction and drug abuse being the most important. Across specialties, physicians reported decreased opioid prescribing for OA, irrespective of OA severity, and in most cases attributed changes in prescribing to the CDC guideline.

Background Tofacitinib is an oral small molecule Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of ulcerative colitis [UC]. We evaluated the relationship between Mayo/Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire [IBDQ] scores and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment-UC [WPAI-UC] components in patients with UC. Methods All available pooled data from three Phase 3 tofacitinib studies [OCTAVE Induction 1 and 2 and OCTAVE Sustain] were included. Relationships were estimated using repeated measures regression models with Mayo score/subscores or IBDQ total/domain scores as a separate anchor predictor and WPAI-UC components as the outcome. Results Evidence for linear relationships was confirmed between Mayo/IBDQ scores and WPAI-UC components. Robust relationships between total Mayo score/IBDQ total score and WPAI-UC presenteeism, work productivity loss, and activity impairment were observed; relationships with absenteeism were weak. Total Mayo scores of 0 and 12 corresponded, on average, to WPAI-UC component scores of Conclusion Robust relationships between Mayo/IBDQ scores with WPAI-UC presenteeism, work productivity loss, and activity impairment suggest that patient productivity and non-work activities are strongly associated with disease activity and HRQoL. The weak relationships with absenteeism suggest that patients attend work regardless of their disease activity/poor HRQoL. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01465763;NCT01458951;NCT01458574.

Introduction Atopic dermatitis (AD) severity was measured in two phase 3 US studies of crisaborole ointment, 2%, in patients aged ≥ 2 years using the Investigator’s Static Global Assessment (ISGA), an FDA-recommended scale. Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) is a validated scale used globally to assess AD severity in clinical trials. The objective of this study is to aid interpretability of ISGA by translating ISGA scores to EASI scores. Methods ISGA was mapped to EASI using published EASI severity strata by Chopra et al. and Leshem et al. and pooled data from phase 3 trials CrisADe CORE 1 and CORE 2, which evaluated crisaborole in patients aged ≥ 2 years with mild-to-moderate AD (crisaborole, n = 1016; vehicle, n = 506). Least squares mean (LSM) percentage change from baseline (%CFB) in EASI and proportion of patients with 50%, 75%, and 90% improvement (EASI-50, EASI-75, and EASI-90, respectively) on day 29 were computed for mapped EASI. The relationship between changes in ISGA and changes in EASI was assessed using data from three abrocitinib trials. Results ISGA was mapped to EASI using 70,000 random simulations. LSM (standard error) for %CFB in mapped EASI at day 29 (crisaborole versus vehicle) was −26.3% (17) versus 45.2% (35) (P = 0.0671) using Chopra strata and −43.1% (4.6) versus −5.2% (8.4) (P

To evaluate healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) by osteoarthritis (OA) pain severity.Cross-sectional surveys of US physicians and their patients were conducted between February and May 2017. Using the Numeric Rating Scale, patients were classified by self-reported pain intensity in the last week into mild (0-3), moderate (4-6), and severe (7-10) cohorts. Parameters assessed included clinical characteristics, HCRU, and current caregiver support. Descriptive statistics were obtained, and analysis of variance and chi-square tests were performed.Patients (n = 841) were mostly female (60.9%) and white (77.8%), with mean age of 64.6 years. Patients reported mild (45.4%), moderate (35.9%), and severe (18.7%) OA pain. Mean number of affected joints varied by pain severity (range mild: 2.7 to severe: 3.6;Greater current pain was associated with more prior HCRU including imaging for monitoring progression, HCP visits including more specialty care, hospitalizations, surgery/planned surgery, and loss of independence due to functional disability. Yet rates of hospitalizations and X-ray use were still sizable even among patients with mild pain. These cross-sectional findings warrant longitudinal assessment to further elucidate the impact of pain on HCRU.

Srinivas R Nalamachu,1 Rebecca L Robinson,2 Lars Viktrup,3 Joseph C Cappelleri,4 Andrew G Bushmakin,4 Leslie Tive,5 Jennifer Mellor,6 Niall Hatchell,6 James Jackson6 1Mid America PolyClinic, Overland Park, KS, USA; 2Patient Outcomes and Real-World Evidence, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA; 3Lilly Bio-Medicines Core Team, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA; 4Statistics, Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT, USA; 5Medical Affairs, Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA; 6Real World Research, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, Cheshire, UKCorrespondence: Rebecca L RobinsonEli Lilly and Company, Lilly Research Labs, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN 46285, USATel +1 317-224-5833Fax +1 317-277-0490Email rlrobinson@lilly.comPurpose: The purpose of this study was to assess how patient-reported pain is related to osteoarthritis (OA) treatment patterns in routine clinical practice.Patients and Methods: Data were collected between February and May 2017 from 153 United States (US) primary care physicians, rheumatologists, and orthopedic surgeons. Each invited up to nine consecutive patients to rate their OA pain in the last week. Physicians provided demographic, clinical, and treatment information for patients, including nonpharmacologic therapies ever recommended, currently recommended over-the-counter (OTC) medications, and currently and ever prescribed medications for the management of OA. Findings for patients with mild (0─3), moderate (4─6), and severe current pain (7─10) were compared using appropriate statistics.Results: Among the 841 patients (61% female; mean 65 years; 57% knee OA), 45% reported mild, 36% moderate, and 19% severe current OA pain. Current treatment modalities differed by pain severity (P< 0.05). Most patients (70%) had been recommended nonpharmacologic therapy and 40% were currently recommended OTC medications. More patients with moderate (81%) or severe pain (78%) currently received prescription medications, with or without nonpharmacologic therapy, versus those with mild pain (67%). Overall, 47% of patients currently received just one prescription drug, while 49% had received one prescription drug ever. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were the most common current (58%) and ever received (88%) prescriptions. Current NSAID prescriptions were not associated with pain severity. Acetaminophen recommendations, opioid prescriptions (current and ever), and multiple prescription medications tried were numerically highest in the severe pain group (all P< 0.05 by pain severity). In all groups, > 80% of treatment switches were due to lack of efficacy.Conclusion: Real-life treatment patterns for OA in the US are significantly associated with current patient-reported pain. Combining nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic treatments is common but higher pain ratings are associated with multiple failed prescription treatments. Current use of acetaminophen and opioids, but not NSAIDs, increases alongside pain severity.Keywords: nonprescription drugs, prescription drugs, therapeutics, pain management, practice patterns, physicians

Background Tofacitinib is an oral, small molecule Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). We examined the effect of tofacitinib induction treatment on Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) items in adults with moderate to severe UC. Methods Data were pooled from the randomized, 8‑week, double-blind, phase 3 OCTAVE Induction 1 and 2 studies. The IBDQ was self-administered by patients at baseline, week 4, and week 8, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Change from baseline in IBDQ items was analyzed for 10 mg of tofacitinib twice daily (BID) vs placebo using a linear mixed-effects model, with no multiplicity adjustment performed. Effect sizes were calculated. Subgroup analyses by tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) experience were performed. Results Significant improvements (nominal P < 0.05) were observed in all IBDQ items with 10 mg of tofacitinib BID vs placebo at weeks 4 and 8. For the overall population, the largest treatment differences across all items were reported for “bowel movements been loose” at weeks 4 and 8, and “problem with rectal bleeding” at week 8 (mean treatment differences all 1.1; both in bowel symptoms domain). These items also showed the largest effect sizes. Treatment benefits were generally slightly numerically higher in TNFi-experienced vs TNFi-naïve patients. Conclusions Tofacitinib induction therapy improved all IBDQ items vs placebo in patients with UC, reflecting improvements in HRQoL, with greatest benefits reported in bowel symptoms domain items (Funded by Pfizer Inc; OCTAVE Induction 1 and OCTAVE Induction 2; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01465763 and NCT01458951, respectively).

Objectives Evaluate relationships between changes in dermatologic assessments and quality of life (QoL) measures; quantify dermatologic symptom severity impacts on QoL in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) treated with tofacitinib. Methods Data were from two phase III studies; patients received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily (BID), adalimumab 40 mg every other week, or placebo advancing to tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID at Month 3. Repeated measures longitudinal models assessed relationships between dermatologic assessments (predictors) Itch Severity Item (ISI), Physician’s Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PGA-PsO), and Patient’s Global Joint and Skin Assessment-Visual Analog Scale-Psoriasis question (PGJS-VAS-PsO), and QoL measures (outcomes) Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and Short Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2). Models included one predictor and one outcome. Results Direct, approximately linear relationships existed between predictors and outcomes. ISI/PGA-PsO/PGJS-VAS-PsO improvements from baseline of ≥3/≥2/≥40-mm VAS corresponded with clinically meaningful DLQI improvements; improvements from baseline of ≥4/≥3/≥40-mm VAS generally corresponded with clinically meaningful improvements across component scores and all SF-36v2 domains. Conclusions Substantial links exist between dermatologic symptoms and QoL in patients with PsA, potentially informing patient-centered care and research. Rheumatologists should be aware of dermatologic manifestations and QoL impacts in patients with PsA. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01877668; NCT01882439

Background: Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) often report impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Tofacitinib is an oral small molecule Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of UC. In addition to previous demonstrations of improved clinical measures (e.g., Mayo score), tofacitinib has been shown to improve HRQoL in patients with UC. This analysis explored the interrelationships among tofacitinib treatment, HRQoL, and disease activity (measured using Mayo subscores) using mediation modeling. Methods: Data were collected from two 8-week induction studies (OCTAVE Induction 1 and 2) in patients with moderate to severe UC treated with tofacitinib or placebo. Two mediation models were specified. First, Mayo subscores were mediators between the binary treatment variable (tofacitinib vs placebo) and the eight Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF 36) domain scores as outcomes. Second, the four Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) domain scores served as outcomes. Both models used data collected at Week 8. Results: Overall, 1073 and 1079 patients were included in the SF-36- and IBDQ-based models, respectively. For all SF-36 domains, improvements in Mayo subscores were estimated to explain 65.6% (bodily pain) to 92.9% (mental health) of the total treatment effect on SF-36 domain scores (all p

Background: Several pharmaceutical treatments for chronic pain caused by osteoarthritis (OA) and chronic low back pain (CLBP) are available or currently under development, each associated with different adverse events (AEs) and efficacy profiles. It is therefore important to understand what trade-offs patients are willing to make when choosing between treatments. Methods: A discrete-choice experiment (DCE) was conducted with 437 adults with chronic pain caused by OA and/or CLBP. Respondents were presented with a series of scenarios and asked to choose between pairs of hypothetical treatments, each defined by six attributes: level of symptom control; risks of heart attack, rapidly progressive osteoarthritis and dependency; frequency and mode of administration and cost. Attributes were based on known profiles of oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids and injected nerve growth factor inhibitors, the last of which were under clinical development at the time of the study. Data were analysed using a latent class (LC) model to explore preference heterogeneity. Results: Overall, respondents considered improving symptom control and reducing risk of physical dependency to be the most important attributes. The LC analysis identified four participant classes: an ‘efficacy-focused’ class (33.7%), a ‘cost-averse’ class (29.4%), a ‘physical-dependence–averse’ class (19.6%) and a ‘needle-averse’ class (17.3%). Subgroup membership was incompletely predicted by participant age and their responses to comprehension questions. Conclusions: Preference heterogeneity across respondents indicates a need for a personalized approach to offering treatment options. Symptom improvement, cost, physical dependence and route of administration might be important to different patients. Significance: Multiple treatment options that differ substantially in terms of efficacy and adverse events are available for the management of chronic pain. With a growing emphasis on a patient-centred care model that incorporates patients’ priorities and values into treatment decisions, there is a need to understand how individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain balance the benefits and risks of treatment and how treatment priorities vary among individuals. This study was designed to identify patient preferences for different characteristics of treatments for the management of chronic pain and to investigate how preferences differ among respondents.

Objective.To define meaningful within-patient change (MWPC) in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC).Methods.Data were analyzed separately from 3 phase III clinical trials (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02697773, NCT02709486, NCT02528188) of tanezumab, a novel treatment intended for the relief of signs and symptoms of moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis (OA), administered subcutaneously every 8 weeks. Patients with moderate-to-severe OA of the hip or knee completed the WOMAC and patient global assessment of OA (PGA-OA) at regular timepoints. A repeated measures longitudinal model with change in WOMAC Pain, Physical Function, or Stiffness domain score as the outcome and change in PGA-OA as the anchor was used to establish MWPC for WOMAC domains.Results.In the 3 studies, there were 688, 844, and 2948 subjects available for analyses, respectively. Analysis showed that a linear relationship between changes in WOMAC domains and changes in PGA-OA was supported and justified. Moreover, the relationships between these changes were very similar for 2 trials and close for the third. The estimated MWPC for the 3 WOMAC domains were from 0.84–1.16 (0–10 numerical rating scale) and from 12.50–16.23%, depending on study and domain, that corresponded to a 1-category change on PGA-OA. For a 2-category change those values were from 1.68–2.31 and from 25.01–32.46%, respectively.Conclusion.These results establish MWPCs for WOMAC domains, at the individual patient level, for patients with moderate-to-severe OA of the hip or knee. [ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02697773, NCT02709486, and NCT02528188]

Satisfaction with medications prescribed for osteoarthritis (OA) varies; this study aimed to determine the factors associated with satisfaction in US patients and their physicians.This point-in-time study used the Adelphi OA Disease Specific Programme (physicians identified from public lists reported on nine consecutive patients diagnosed with OA [any joint]: physicians and patients completed questionnaires). Patient's demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics associated with patient-reported and physician-rated overall satisfaction with, and expectations of effectiveness of, medication for OA were assessed using multivariate linear regression.Responses from 572 patients (mean age 64.9 years, 60.5% female) currently prescribed medication for OA and 153 physicians (81 primary care, 35 rheumatologists, 37 orthopedic surgeons) were analyzed. Pain intensity was moderate or severe for 59.4% of patients. Greater patient-reported overall satisfaction with medication was significantly associated with (standardized beta, 95% confidence interval) exercise (0.12, 0.03-0.20), comorbid other musculoskeletal or painful conditions (vs none) (0.15, 0.06-0.24), and physicians' report that the best control had been achieved (0.12, 0.03-0.20); lack of efficacy was among factors associated with worse satisfaction. Greater patient-reported expectation of effectiveness was significantly associated with exercise (0.12, 0.03-0.21) and the most troublesome joint not being a knee, hip, or their back (0.08, 0.01-0.14). Greater physician-rated overall satisfaction with medication was significantly associated with their report that the best control had been achieved (0.18, 0.11-0.26), the most troublesome joint being a knee (0.08, 0.01-0.14), comorbid other musculoskeletal or painful conditions (0.07, 0.01-0.12), obesity (0.06, 0.00-0.11), and female patients (0.06, 0.00-0.11); lack of efficacy and adverse events/tolerability issues were among factors associated with worse satisfaction. For physicians, their report that the best control had been achieved (0.19, 0.11-0.27), the most troublesome joint being a knee (0.08, 0.00-0.15), improving (vs stable) OA (0.15, 0.07-0.24), and uncertain duration of OA (0.11, 0.02-0.21) were associated with greater perception that the medication was meeting patients' efficacy expectations.Although efficacy was strongly associated with both patients' and physicians' satisfaction with medication, other factors were also important, including exercise (for patients), tolerability (for physicians), and knee OA (for physicians).

Patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) experience impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of PsA, which has been associated with improvements in dermatologic endpoints in patients with PsA. To assess the extent to which tofacitinib affects patient HRQoL via improvements in dermatologic symptoms, including itch, data were pooled from patients with PsA who received tofacitinib in phase III studies (NCT01866668 and NCT01882439). Mediation modeling assessed the indirect effects (via Itch Severity Item [ISI] and Physician’s Global Assessment of Psoriasis [PGA-PsO]) and direct effects (via all other factors) of tofacitinib treatment on dermatology-specific HRQoL (measured by Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI]). In the initial model, the treatment effect on DLQI was largely mediated by itch (ISI, p &lt, 0.0001) and PGA-PsO (p &lt, 0.01). The model was re-specified to assess the indirect effects only of itch and PGA-PsO on DLQI. Here, 17.7% of the treatment effect on DLQI was attributable to PGA-PsO (p = 0.0006), and 82.3% to itch (p &lt, 0.0001). Tofacitinib-dependent improvements in DLQI were primarily mediated by itch relief, in addition to improvements in PGA-PsO.

BackgroundPain is a core domain of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). This post hoc analysis evaluated time to pain improvement and the impact of baseline pain severity on pain response in patients with PsA receiving tofacitinib.MethodsData from two trials (NCT01877668; NCT01882439) in patients receiving tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily, placebo switching to tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily at month 3 (placebo-to-tofacitinib) or adalimumab (NCT01877668 only) were included. Improvement in pain (≥30%/≥50% decrease from baseline in Visual Analogue Scale pain score) was assessed; median time to initial (first post-baseline visit)/continued (first two consecutive post-baseline visits) pain improvement was estimated (Kaplan-Meier) for all treatment arms. A parametric model was used to determine the relationship between baseline pain severity and time to pain response in patients receiving tofacitinib.ResultsAt month 3, more patients experienced pain improvements with tofacitinib/adalimumab versus placebo. Median days (95% CI) to initial/continued pain improvements of ≥30% and ≥50%, respectively, were 55 (29–57)/60 (57–85) and 85 (57–92)/171 (90–not estimable (NE)) for tofacitinib, versus 106 (64–115)/126 (113–173) and 169 (120–189)/NE (247–NE) for placebo-to-tofacitinib. Pain improvements were also experienced more quickly for adalimumab versus placebo. Predicted time to ≥30%/≥50% pain improvement was shorter in patients with higher baseline pain versus lower baseline pain (tofacitinib arm only).ConclusionsIn patients with PsA, pain improvements were experienced by more patients, and more rapidly, with tofacitinib and adalimumab versus placebo. In those receiving tofacitinib, higher baseline pain was associated with faster pain improvements.

Background Several different Physician Global Assessment (PGA) versions have been used in clinical studies as a co-primary end point to evaluate psoriasis severity. Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor. We performed an analysis of the PGA using data from studies of tofacitinib in moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis. Methods Data from 3641 patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis, enrolled in one of four phase III tofacitinib studies (OPT Pivotal 1 and 2, OPT Compare and OPT Retreatment), were used to evaluate a three-item PGA scale. Results Confirmatory Factor Analyses showed that equal weighting of the three items (erythema, induration and scaling) was appropriate. The PGA demonstrated acceptable test–retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, 0.7) and internal consistency (Cronbach’s Coefficient Alpha ≥ 0.9 at primary time points). The Clinically Important Difference was estimated as 0.55 (95% confidence interval: 0.546–0.563). Known-group validity was shown by demonstrating that PGA scores could discriminate between different degrees of disease severity. The PGA was significantly correlated with other clinical end points in the studies (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, r = 0.75–0.79; Dermatology Life Quality Index, r = 0.44–0.57; Patient Global Assessment, r = 0.66–0.72). Conclusions Consistent with previous findings from a phase II study, these results indicate that this PGA is a valid, reliable instrument for evaluating disease severity in clinical studies of psoriasis. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12895-019-0088-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Crisaborole ointment is a nonsteroidal phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor for the treatment of mild to moderate atopic dermatitis. Using pooled data from two phase 3 studies (NCT02118766/NCT02118792), mediation modeling determined the interrelationship among pruritus, quality of life (QoL), and treatment. Patients aged ≥ 2 years received crisaborole ointment 2% or vehicle twice daily for 28 days. QoL measures were Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) (≥ 16 years) and Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) (2–15 years). Pruritus was assessed by the Severity of Pruritus Scale (4-point scale from 0 to 3). The indirect effect of crisaborole on QoL mediated through its effect on pruritus was 51% (DLQI model, p 0.05). Mediation modeling shows that crisaborole affects QoL mostly indirectly through pruritus severity reduction.

Purpose To evaluate the relationship between self-reported concerns about becoming addicted to a medication and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Methods This real-world study used patient-level cross-sectional survey data collected from the US Adelphi Disease Specific Programme (DSP). The DSP for OA selected 153 physicians who collected de-identified data on their next nine adult patients with OA. Each patient completed a disease-relevant survey, which included the Likert-scale question, “I am concerned about becoming addicted to my medicine,” (CAA) with responses ranging from “completely disagree” [1] to “completely agree” [5]. HRQoL was measured by the EQ-5D-5L index value and the EQ Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). A set of ordinary least squares regressions using HRQoL measures as outcomes and CAA as a continuous predictor were estimated. Standardized effect size (ES) was used to gauge the magnitude of effects. Results A total of 866 patients with OA completed the survey (female, 61.2%; White, 77.7%; mean age, 64.2 years). Of the 775 patients who completed the CAA question, almost one-third responded that they “agree” (18%) or “completely agree” (11%), while 27% responded “completely disagree” and 20% “disagree.” Regression analyses found that patients who have concerns about medication addiction have significantly different EQ-5D-5L index values and EQ VAS scores compared with patients who do not have this concern (p Conclusion Our findings suggest that concern about medication addiction in patients with OA may have an impact on patient HRQoL, with more concerned patients reporting poorer HRQoL outcomes.

Background In psoriatic arthritis (PsA), further understanding of the relationships between clinical measures and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is needed. This post hoc analysis evaluated associations between minimal disease activity (MDA) as a continuous outcome (termed ScoreMDA) or Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) with selected PROs not included in the composite measures. Methods Data from two phase 3 studies of tofacitinib in PsA (OPAL Broaden [NCT01877668; N = 422]; OPAL Beyond [NCT01882439; N = 394]) were included. MDA (binary outcome) was defined as meeting ≥5/7 criteria. For ScoreMDA, each criterion was assigned a value (1 = true; 0 = false; score range, 0–7; scores ≥5 indicated MDA). For PASDAS (score range, 0–10), higher scores indicated worse disease activity. PROs analyzed included Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F), Patient’s Assessment of Arthritis Pain visual analog scale (Pain VAS), and EuroQoL-Five Dimensions-Three Level Health Questionnaire visual analog scale (EQ-5D-3L VAS) and utility index. Relationships were evaluated using repeated measures regression models. Results Similar, approximately linear relationships were confirmed between PASDAS or ScoreMDA and PROs in both studies. In OPAL Broaden and OPAL Beyond, a one-point difference in PASDAS was associated with clinically relevant differences in PROs, including EQ-5D-3L VAS (− 6.7 mm, − 6.9 mm), Pain VAS (9.9 mm, 10.7 mm), and FACIT-F (− 2.8, − 3.3). A one-point difference in ScoreMDA was associated with clinically relevant differences in PROs, including EQ-5D-3L VAS (5.0 mm, 5.5 mm) and FACIT-F (1.9, 2.7) in OPAL Broaden and OPAL Beyond, respectively. Conclusions Linear associations between PASDAS or ScoreMDA and PROs provide interpretable and quantifiable metrics between composite clinical measures and PROs, highlighting the importance of these measures in understanding the relevance of treat-to-target goals in PsA. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01877668. Registered on June 12, 2013. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01882439. Registered on June 18, 2013

Introduction The Investigator’s Static Global Assessment (ISGA) is a 5-point rating scale that is recommended by the US Food and Drug Administration for assessing the severity of atopic dermatitis (AD), and ISGA success is a widely used endpoint in AD clinical studies. In this study, we seek to interpret the relationship of ISGA with treatment, pruritus, and quality of life (QoL) by conducting post hoc analyses of pooled data from two phase 3 crisaborole studies. Methods Patients aged ≥ 2 years with baseline ISGA of 2 (mild) or 3 (moderate) were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive crisaborole or vehicle for 28 days. Disease severity, pruritus severity, and QoL were assessed with the ISGA, Severity of Pruritus Scale (SPS), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI; patients aged ≥ 16 years), or Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI; patients aged 2–15 years), respectively. The effect of treatment on ISGA and the relationship between ISGA and QoL were analyzed using a longitudinal repeated-measures model. The interrelationship between treatment, disease severity, pruritus, and QoL was analyzed with a mediation model. Results Overall, 1522 patients (crisaborole, n = 1016; vehicle, n = 506) were included. Estimated longitudinal profiles indicated changes in ISGA by day 8 were large for crisaborole (effect size [ES]: − 0.68) and small for vehicle (ES: − 0.34). There was a direct relationship between ISGA and DLQI and CDLQI severity bands in the longitudinal repeated-measures model. For both QoL mediation models, treatment effects on QoL were mediated indirectly by reduction in pruritus (DLQI, 42.4%; CDLQI, 58.1%) and disease severity (DLQI, 12.2%; CDLQI, 33.1%). Conclusions These post hoc analyses suggest that ISGA success is a clinically meaningful endpoint associated with reduction in the severity of pruritus and improvement in QoL. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13555-021-00506-y.

Introduction Most patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments that measure atopic dermatitis (AD) symptoms do not have sufficient documented evidence of content validity to satisfy regulatory agency guidance for inclusion in product-labelling claims in the USA or Europe. The objective of this study was to develop a PRO instrument in accordance with regulatory agency guidance to assess daily AD symptoms during the course of therapy and to establish its content validity and psychometric properties. Methods The Pruritus and Symptoms Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (PSAAD) daily diary was developed based on qualitative interviews with US adolescents and adults with mild-to-severe AD. Content validity, test–retest reliability, internal consistency reliability, clinically important difference, clinically important responder, convergent validity, and known-group validity were evaluated using correlational and regression methods from phase 2b data from US adults with moderate-to-severe AD who were treated with abrocitinib. Results Patient interviews conducted with US adolescents and adults with mild-to-severe AD identified 11 relevant symptoms (itch, dryness, redness, flaking, discolouration, pain, bleeding, cracking, bumps, swelling, and weeping/oozing) for inclusion in the PSAAD instrument. All PSAAD psychometric parameters were acceptable based on phase 2b data from US adults with moderate-to-severe AD. Convergent validity and known-group validity were confirmed by significant correlations between PSAAD and six other PRO measures (r = 0.24–0.91, all p ≤ 0.01) and Dermatology Life Quality Index category (p ≤ 0.0001), respectively. Conclusions Evidence supports the PSAAD instrument validity, reliability, responsiveness and definitions of clinically important changes/differences for adults with moderate-to-severe AD. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13555-020-00474-9.

Summary Objective To quantify preferences for attributes of potential analgesic treatments for moderate-to-severe pain associated with osteoarthritis (OA) and/or chronic low back pain (CLBP) as relevant to injectable nerve growth factor (NGF)–inhibitors, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and opioids. Methods We used a discrete-choice experiment (DCE) to elicit preferences for attributes of OA and CLBP pharmaceutical treatments, and a best-worst scaling (BWS) exercise to further characterize the relative importance of treatment-related side-effect risks. The survey was completed online by 602 US residents with self-reported chronic, moderate-to-severe OA pain and/or CLBP who had tried, had contraindications for, or were unwilling to take currently available pharmaceutical therapies. In the DCE, respondents repeatedly chose between two hypothetical treatments defined by six attributes (symptom control; treatment-related risks of (1) severe joint problems, (2) heart attack, and (3) physical dependence; mode/frequency of administration; and cost). In the BWS exercise, respondents evaluated ten side-effect risks. Random-parameters logit models were estimated; conditional relative attribute importance, maximum acceptable risks, and willingness to pay were calculated. Results The most important DCE attributes were improving symptom control (scaled conditional relative importance, 10.00) and reducing risk of physical dependence (6.99). The three most important BWS attributes were, in rank order, risks of stroke, physical dependence, and heart attack. Respondents were willing to accept a > 4% treatment-related risk of severe joint problems for even modest symptom improvement. Conclusion A pharmaceutical treatment with a risk of severe joint problems was viewed as an acceptable alternative to other treatments with comparable efficacy but risks associated with NSAIDs or opioids.

Purpose: The 32-item Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ-32) is the most frequently used instrument to capture disease-specific quality of life in randomized clinical trials for ulcerative colitis. This review and meta-analysis provides the first synthesis of evidence regarding the sensitivity of IBDQ-32 total and domain scores to treatment efficacy. Methods: A systematic literature search and risk-of-bias assessment yielded 14 articles that were included in the primary analysis. Treatments were categorized as efficacious if they met the primary efficacy endpoint (which was not the IBDQ-32); otherwise they were categorized as non-efficacious. A continuous measure of treatment efficacy was calculated for each primary efficacy endpoint. Meta-analysis using random-effects models compared standardized mean differences in IBDQ-32 total and domain change scores between target dose and control arms. Meta-regression compared the association between treatment efficacy and these outcomes. Results: Studies with efficacious treatments showed larger mean improvements relative to controls in IBDQ-32 total scores and all 4 domains (Hedges’ g range: 0.49 to 0.67; P < 0.001 for all). At the same time, patients in studies with non-efficacious treatments showed small and nonsignificant improvements in these outcomes relative to controls (Hedges’ g range: 0.05 to 0.23; P > 0.09 for all). Meta-regression models showed that the magnitude of treatment efficacy was a positive predictor of these same IBDQ-32 outcomes. Conclusions: These analyses found that IBDQ-32 scores are sensitive to treatment. The results provided here support the use of the IBDQ-32 to capture treatment benefits on quality of life for patients with ulcerative colitis.

Background/Objectives Crisaborole ointment, 2%, is a nonsteroidal phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor for the treatment of mild‐to‐moderate atopic dermatitis (AD). This pooled post hoc analysis of two phase 3 trials (NCT02118766, NCT02118792) assessed improvement and time to improvement in Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) and Severity of Pruritus Scale (SPS) outcomes in pediatric patients with mild‐to‐moderate AD. Methods Patients aged ≥2 years were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive twice‐daily crisaborole or vehicle for 28 days. Patients aged 2‐17 years were pooled for this analysis. Proportions of patients and time to achieving ISGA success (clear [0] or almost clear [1] with ≥2‐grade improvement from baseline), ISGA clear/almost clear, ≥1‐grade improvement in ISGA, SPS success (SPS score ≤1 with ≥1‐grade improvement), or ≥1‐grade improvement in SPS score were analyzed and stratified by baseline ISGA. Results At first postbaseline assessment (day 8), significantly higher proportions of crisaborole‐ than vehicle‐treated patients achieved ISGA success, ISGA clear/almost clear, ≥1‐grade ISGA improvement, SPS success, or ≥1‐grade improvement in SPS regardless of baseline ISGA. Differences were significantly greater over time for all outcomes for patients with moderate baseline ISGA and numerically greater for those with mild baseline ISGA. Median times to ISGA and SPS outcomes were shorter for crisaborole versus vehicle. Conclusion Improvement in ISGA and SPS outcomes were observed with crisaborole in pediatric patients with mild‐to‐moderate baseline AD.

Although the osteoarthritis (OA) burden is well-recognised, the benefit of currently available OA pharmacological therapy is not clear. This study aimed to assess whether the impact of OA pain on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), work, and healthcare resource utilisation (HRU) differed by both pain severity and prescription medication status.This cross-sectional study used pooled data from the 2016/2017 European National Health and Wellness Survey. Respondents with self-reported physician-diagnosed OA and pain were included. Outcomes examined included HRQoL, health utility, health status, work productivity and activity impairment, and HRU. Groups derived from self-reported pain severity and prescription medication use were compared using chi-square tests, analysis of variance, and generalised linear models controlling for socio-demographics, health behaviours, and health status.Respondents with OA (n=2417) reported mild (40.4%, of which 44.9% prescription-treated) and moderate to severe pain (59.6%, of which 54.0% prescription-treated). HRQoL, health utility, health status, and work and activity impairment were substantially worse among the moderate/severe pain prescription-treated group compared to the rest (e.g. SF-12v2 physical component score [PCS] for moderate/severe pain prescription-treated=34.5 versus mild pain prescription-treated =39.3, moderate/severe pain prescription-untreated=40.6, and mild pain prescription-untreated=45.6; p0.01). HRU such as the mean number of emergency room visits for6 months was higher in the prescription-treated groups (0.51-0.52, 95% CI 0.437-0.71) than the prescription-untreated groups (0.30-0.34, 95% CI 0.21-0.46; p0.05).Persons with moderate to severe OA pain treated with available prescription medications have poor health status and HRQoL and increased HRU compared to those not receiving prescription medications.

Postmenopausal women (PMW) can experience side-effects (breast pain/tenderness and vaginal spotting/bleeding) associated with estrogen plus progestin therapies (EPTs). To assess these outcomes, the Breast Pain and Tenderness Daily Diary (BPT-DD) and the Vaginal Bleeding and Spotting Daily Diary (VBS-DD) were developed for electronic completion (eDiaries). This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the eDiaries.The eDiaries were completed daily for 28 days by 202 PMW experiencing breast pain/tenderness and/or vaginal spotting/bleeding while on EPTs. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) investigated the BPT-DD structure. Response distributions, test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]), internal consistency (BPT-DD only), and construct validity (via known groups and convergent validity analyses) were assessed.Completion rates were high: over 90% of women missed3 daily entries. CFA supported the BPT-DD unidimensional structure (Bentler's Comparative Fit Index0.98). BPT-DD inter-item correlations (r = 0.77-0.89) and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.95-0.97) were high and good test-retest reliability was demonstrated (ICC ≥ 0.70). The eDiaries correlated moderately (0.40), in a logical pattern with other instruments, supporting convergent validity. Known-groups analyses indicated both measures demonstrated significant differences between patients of differing severity (p 0.001).The study provides evidence of strong psychometric properties for the BPT-DD and VBS-DD to assess breast pain/tenderness and spotting/bleeding in PMW.

Background and aims This review is the first to evaluate the burden of ulcerative colitis [UC] on patients' quality of life by synthesizing data from studies comparing scores from the SF-36® Health Survey, a generic measure assessing eight quality-of-life domains, between UC patients and matched reference samples. Methods A systematic review of the published literature identified articles reporting SF-36 domains or physical and mental component summary scores [PCS, MCS] from UC and reference samples. Burden of disease for each SF-36 domain was then summarized across studies by comparing weighted mean differences in scores between patient and reference samples with minimally important difference thresholds. Results Thirty articles met pre-specified inclusion criteria. SF-36 scores were extracted from five samples of patients with active disease, 11 samples with a mixture of disease activity, five samples of patients in clinical remission, and 13 samples of patients following proctocolectomy with ileostomy or ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, along with respective reference samples. Clinically meaningful burden was observed in samples with active or mixed disease activity [deficits: PCS = 5.6, MCS = 5.5] on all SF-36 domains except Physical Functioning. No burden was observed in samples in remission or post-surgical patients [deficits: PCS = 0.8, MCS = 0.4] except for the General Health perception domain. Conclusions Patients with active UC experience a clinically meaningful burden of disease across most aspects of quality of life. Patients with inactive UC exhibit negligible disease burden and are comparable to the general population on most quality-of-life outcomes. Thus, treatments which effectively induce and maintain remission may restore physical and mental health status.

Background:Due to its impact on their health-related quality of life (QoL), fatigue is considered a core domain of disease assessment in patients (pts) with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Psychometric data analyses in pts with rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis have previously demonstrated that the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) is a reliable and valid measure in these pt populations,1,2 but there are limited data supporting the psychometric validity and reliability of the FACIT-F scale in adult pts with active AS.Objectives:To further evaluate the psychometric properties of the FACIT-F scale in adult pts with active AS.Methods:This post hoc analysis used data from the Phase (P)2 (NCT01786668, Study 1) and P3 (NCT03502616, Study 2) studies of tofacitinib in pts with active AS. Second-order confirmatory analysis (CFA) evaluated the measurement model of FACIT-F with two domains (Experience and Impact) and the total score at baseline (BL) and the studies’ respective primary analysis time points, Week (W)12 (Study 1) or W16 (Study 2). At the same time points, internal consistency reliability was examined by Cronbach’s Coefficient alpha (α), and convergent validity was assessed through correlations of FACIT-F domain and total scores with a set of pt-reported outcomes (PROs): Pt Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA), total back pain/nocturnal spinal pain due to AS, Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36v2), Bath AS Functional Index, Bath AS Disease Activity Index and ASQoL. Test-retest reliability was assessed by calculating Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs). The known-groups validity assessment was derived from an anchor-based repeated measures longitudinal model, with PtGA scores as the anchor (PtGA represented pt state from ‘no disease activity’ to ‘very active disease’ [PtGA=0 and 10, respectively]), and FACIT-F domain/total scores as the outcome. Estimations of ability to detect change and meaningful within-pt change (MWPC) were derived from anchor-based repeated measures longitudinal models, with change from BL in PtGA scores as the anchor and change from BL in FACIT-F domain/total scores as the outcome.Results:The CFA model fit the data well (Bentler’s Comparative Index ≥0.92 at BL, W12 [Study 1] and W16 [Study 2]), supporting the measurement model of the FACIT-F scale in pts with AS. Across time points in each study, the FACIT-F domain and total scores demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s Coefficient α ≥0.88), and correlations between FACIT-F domain/total scores, and all PROs assessed generally exceeded 0.40. Generally, in both studies, the largest correlations (0.62–0.85) were between FACIT-F domain/total scores and the SF-36v2 vitality domain score and ASQoL. Test-retest reliability was acceptable for all FACIT-F domain/total scores (ICC ranged from 0.75–0.89 in both studies). An approximately linear relationship was observed between FACIT-F total scores and PtGA scores in both studies (Figure), as well as for Experience and Impact domain scores. The differences in FACIT-F domain/total scores were large and statistically significant between ‘no disease activity’ and ‘very active disease’ pt groups (standardised effect size ≥1.17), supporting known-groups validity. Ability to detect change was evidenced by an approximately linear relationship between changes in PtGA and FACIT-F domain/total scores in both studies; when pts experienced a change in PtGA, values for FACIT-F domain/total scores changed accordingly. Conservatively, MWPC was estimated as 6.3 for FACIT-F total score, and 2.8 and 3.6 for FACIT-F Experience and Impact domain scores, respectively.Conclusion:This quantitative analysis of data from two clinical studies of tofacitinib demonstrates the validity and reliability of the FACIT-F scale in adult pts with active AS. Therefore, these findings support the use of FACIT-F in AS studies.References:[1]Cella et al. J Rheumatol 2005; 32: 811-819.[2]Cella et al. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2019; 3: 30.Acknowledgements:Study sponsored by Pfizer Inc. Medical writing support was provided by Kirsten Woollcott, CMC Connect, and funded by Pfizer Inc.Disclosure of Interests:David Cella Consultant of: AbbVie, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Clovis Oncology, Evidera, Exelixis, Horizon Therapeutics, Janssen, Merck/Schering-Plough, National Academy of Sciences, Novartis Pharma K.K. (Japan), Pfizer Inc, PledPharma and Regeneron, William Lenderking Shareholder of: Pfizer Inc, Employee of: Evidera, Peter Chongpinitchai Employee of: Evidera, Andrew G Bushmakin Shareholder of: Pfizer Inc, Employee of: Pfizer Inc, Oluwaseyi Dina Shareholder of: Pfizer Inc, Employee of: Pfizer Inc, Lisy Wang Shareholder of: Pfizer Inc, Employee of: Pfizer Inc, Joseph C Cappelleri Shareholder of: Pfizer Inc, Employee of: Pfizer Inc, Victoria Navarro-Compán Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Janssen, Eli Lilly, MSD, Pfizer Inc, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Janssen, Eli Lilly, MSD, Pfizer Inc, UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Novartis