1. Clinical Outcomes After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in Older Adults
- Author
-
Mathew S. Maurer, Nihar R. Desai, Samuel W. Reinhardt, Neal G. Ravindra, Ayyaz Ali, Clancy W. Mullan, Megan McCullough, Tariq Ahmad, Cesar Caraballo, Ersilia M. DeFilippis, P. Elliott Miller, Jadry Gruen, Shunichi Nakagawa, Veli K. Topkara, Catherine Mezzacappa, and Andrew E. Levin
- Subjects
Geriatrics ,medicine.medical_specialty ,education.field_of_study ,Adult patients ,business.industry ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Population ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,equipment and supplies ,medicine.disease ,03 medical and health sciences ,Regimen ,0302 clinical medicine ,Age groups ,Heart failure ,Ventricular assist device ,Emergency medicine ,medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,education ,business - Abstract
Objectives The purpose of this study was to examine outcomes after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation in older adults (>75 years of age). Background An aging heart failure population together with improvements in mechanical circulatory support (MCS) technology have led to increasing LVAD implantations in older adults. However, data presenting age-specific outcomes are limited. Methods Adult patients in the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) who required durable MCS between 2008 and 2017 were included. Patients were stratified by 4 age groups: 75 years of age. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were used to assess post-LVAD outcomes, with log-rank testing used to compare groups. Univariate and multivariate cox proportional hazard regression models were used to determine predictors of survival and complications. Results A total of 20,939 individuals received an LVAD during the study period: 7,743 (37.0%) were Conclusions Despite careful selection of older adults for LVAD implantation, age remains a significant predictor of mortality. Higher bleeding and lower clotting risk in elderly patients with LVADs support the use of a less intense antithrombotic regimen in this unique population.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF