Search

Approval of midostaurin, a multikinase inhibitor, in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of adults with newly diagnosed FLT3 mutation–positive acute myeloid leukemia, was based on the p...

Secondary acquisition of t(9;22)(q34;q11.2)/BCR-ABL1 fusion in the context of de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with inv(3)(q21q26)/GATA2-MECOM rearrangement has been rarely reported. Furthermore, t(2;11)(p23;q23)/KMT2A-ASXL2 fusion has been rarely described with only a single case reported to date. We report a 45-year-old male with a diagnosis of de novo AML harboring GATA2-MECOM rearrangement in conjunction with a related subclone with concomitant inv(3) and t(9;22). The patient was treated with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) which lead to disappearance of the inv(3)/t(9;22) subclone and subsequent expansion of the inv(3) ancestral clone. The patient was started on a 7+3 induction regimen with TKI but had persistent disease. He was placed on several additional treatment protocols and only achieved morphologic remission with a combination of fludarabine, cytarabine and filgrastim with TKI. Approximately 11.5 months after diagnosis the patient relapsed with the inv(3) clone predominating initially, followed by return of the inv(3)/t(9;22) subclone and the emergence of a second subclone with concomitant inv(3) and t(2;11)(p23;q23). Mate-pair sequencing was performed and identified a KMT2A-ASXL2 in-frame fusion, which was only recently described in a single case of therapy-related AML. For BCR-ABL1 positive AML, which generally carries a poor prognosis, treatment with TKIs has been proposed in combination with standard chemotherapy. In our case, treatment with TKI alone led to initial response of the BCR-ABL1 positive clone, but the ancestral clone quickly expanded and subsequent standard AML therapy may have led to further clonal evolution and re-emergence of the BCR-ABL1 clone in the absence of therapeutic selection.

Background: Alvocidib is an investigational cyclin-dependent kinase-9 (CDK9) inhibitor that can suppress RNA polymerase II-mediated transcription of genes implicated in leukemia cell survival, including myeloid leukemia cell-1 (MCL-1). MCL-1 is an anti-apoptotic BCL-2 family member that is a key mediator of apoptosis in AML. Alvocidib combined in a timed-sequential regimen with cytarabine and mitoxantrone (ACM) has shown clinical activity in newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML through Phase I and II clinical trials. Analysis of bone marrow samples from newly diagnosed AML patients (pts) treated with ACM showed an association of complete remission (CR) with MCL-1 dependence by a BH3 profiling biomarker assay. Zella 201 was initiated based on the hypothesis that ACM may have preferential clinical activity in pts with MCL-1 dependence. We report the findings from an exploratory cohort of newly diagnosed high-risk (NDHR) AML pts with MCL-1 dependence treated with ACM. Methods: Zella 201 is a biomarker-driven Phase II study of ACM in R/R AML patients with MCL-1 dependence. Stage 1 included a cohort of R/R AML pts with various levels of MCL-1 dependence and an exploratory cohort of NDHR AML with MCL-1 dependence >40%, as determined by a BH3 profiling assay. Eligibility criteria for the NDHR cohort included pts 18-65 years with high-risk AML defined as one of the following: A) treatment-related AML, B) AML from preexisting MDS/MPN, C) adverse-risk by ELN 2017 criteria. Induction therapy consisted of alvocidib 30 mg/m2 as a 30 minute IV bolus followed by 60 mg/m2 over 4 hours on Days (D) 1-3, cytarabine 667 mg/m2/D by continuous IV infusion D6-8, and mitoxantrone 40 mg/m2 IV on D9. Up to 3 additional cycles of the same regimen (with or without mitoxantrone) were permitted in responders. The primary endpoint was CR/CRi. Key secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), overall response rate and safety. Results: Thirteen NDHR pts were treated and evaluable in this cohort (Table 1). One pt received alvocidib on days 1-3 and withdrew from the study on day 6 due to grade 4 diarrhea, cytokine release syndrome, and acute kidney injury. This pt was excluded from the efficacy analysis. Median MCL-1 score was 56% (Range: 42-70%). This cohort was influenced by the following poor risk categories: secondary AML (n= 9; 69%), adverse-risk by ELN (n=8; 62%) and TP53 mutations (n=6; 46%). The most common ≥Grade 3 treatment-emergent non-hematologic AEs (n=14) were diarrhea (29%); TLS, hypocalcemia, sepsis, hypotension (21%), pneumonia, colitis, hyperglycemia, anorectal infection, dyspnea, and left ventricular dysfunction (all 14%). Overall, CR/CRi was 62% with 7 (54%) pts responding following 1 cycle of therapy and another pt achieving CR after a second cycle. Two of six pts with TP53 mutation achieved CR. Although all pts included in this cohort were determined to be MCL-1 dependent, there was no association of CR with increasing MCL-1 dependence. Six (46%) pts went on to an allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT). Sixty-day mortality was 0%. Median follow-up, OS, and RFS were 8.0, 8.5, and 6.1 months, respectively. Five of 8 (68%) CR/CRi pts have relapsed, and 10 pts (77%) have expired to date. The three pts still alive all received a post-study SCT. Conclusion: ACM has clinical activity in a limited cohort of NDHR AML pts with MCL-1 dependence scores >40% in a biomarker assay. Despite observed CR rates, duration of CR was modest and overall outcomes were poor. These results are comparable to historical controls with conventional chemotherapy regimens given the high-risk subset (62% of pts had adverse-risk and 46% had TP53 mutations). Further study is warranted to better define subgroups of ND AML pts who may benefit from alvocidib-containing induction regimens. Disclosures Zeidner: AsystBio Laboratories: Consultancy; AROG: Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Other: Travel Reimbursement, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Oncology, Inc.: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Genentech: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Reimbursement, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Other: Independent Review Committee; Agios: Honoraria. Lee:Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Oncology, Inc.: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Forty Seven: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy. Fine:Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Oncology, Inc: Current Employment. Wang:Bristol Meyers Squibb (Celgene): Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy; Stemline: Speakers Bureau; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Macrogenics: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy. Bhatt:Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Oncoceutics: Other; National Marrow Donor Program: Research Funding; Jazz: Research Funding; Partnership for health analytic research: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Omeros: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Rigel: Consultancy; Tolero: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kolibaba:Verastem: Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Compass Oncology: Ended employment in the past 24 months; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Atara Biotech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Oncology, Inc.: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses Paid; Genentech: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; McKesson Life Sciences: Consultancy; Cell Therapeutics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Anthony:Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Oncology, Inc.: Current Employment; Exact Sciences: Consultancy. Bearss:Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Oncology, Inc: Current Employment. Smith:Jazz: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Objectives Elranatamab (PF-06863135) is a humanized bispecific monoclonal antibody (IgG2a) that targets BCMA, a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily expressed in multiple myeloma, and CD3 on T cells. We reported results for intravenous (IV) dosing (Raje et al. Blood. 2019;134(S1):1869) and now update for subcutaneous (SC) dosing from the ongoing Phase 1 study (MagnetisMM-1; NCT03269136). Materials and methods Patients received elranatamab at 80, 130, 215, 360, 600, and 1000 μg/kg SC weekly. A modified toxicity probability interval method was used for escalation, with monitoring for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) to end of the first cycle. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (v4.03), and cytokine release syndrome (CRS) by American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy criteria (Lee et al. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019;25:625). Response was assessed by International Myeloma Working Group criteria. Pharmacokinetics, cytokine profiling, and T cell immunophenotyping were performed. Results 30 patients had received elranatamab as of 4-Feb-2021 at 80 (n = 6), 130 (n = 4), 215 (n = 4), 360 (n = 4), 600 (n = 6), or 1000 (n = 6) μg/kg SC weekly. Patients had a median of 8 prior treatments; 87% had triple refractory disease, 97% had prior anti-CD38 therapy, and 23% (7 patients) had prior BCMA-directed antibody drug conjugate (6 of 7 patients) or chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (3 of 7 patients). The most common all causality TEAEs included lymphopenia (n = 25, 83%; 20% G3, 63% G4), CRS (n = 22, 73%; 57% G1, 17% G2, none ≥G3), anemia (n = 18, 60%; 50% G3, 0% G4), thrombocytopenia (n = 16, 53%; 17% G3, 20% G4), neutropenia (n = 16, 53%; 23% G3, 30% G4), and injection site reaction (n = 15, 50%; 43% G1, 7% G2, none ≥G3). Both CRS and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (n = 6, 20%) were limited to ≤G2 with median durations of 3 and 2.5 days, respectively. No DLT was observed. Exposure increased with dose, and Tmax ranged from 3–7 days. Cytokine increases occurred with the first dose, and increased T-cell proliferation was observed in peripheral blood. The overall response rate (ORR) for doses ≥215 μg/kg was 70% (n = 14/20) including partial response (PR; n = 1), very good PR (VGPR; n = 7), complete response (CR; n = 1), and stringent CR (sCR; n = 5). Median time to response was 22 days, and 3 of 4 patients (75%) with prior BCMA-directed therapy achieved response (VGPR, n = 2 and sCR, n = 1). Updated data, including duration of response, will be presented. Discussion Elranatamab demonstrated a manageable safety profile and, across the efficacious dose range (≥215 μg/kg), achieved ORR of 70% with CR/sCR rate of 30%, including responses after prior BCMA-directed therapy. Conclusion These results demonstrate the safety and efficacy of elranatamab in this relapsed/refractory population and support ongoing development of elranatamab for patients with multiple myeloma, both as monotherapy and in combination with standard or novel therapies.

Approval of midostaurin, a multikinase inhibitor, in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of adults with newly diagnosed

8006 Background: Elranatamab (PF-06863135) is a humanized bispecific monoclonal antibody (IgG2a) that targets BCMA, a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily expressed in MM, and CD3 on T cells. We reported results for intravenous (IV) dosing (Raje et al. Blood. 2019;134(S1):1869) and now update for subcutaneous (SC) dosing from the ongoing Phase 1 study (MagnetisMM-1). Methods: Patients (pts) received elranatamab at 80, 130, 215, 360, 600, and 1000μg/kg SC weekly. A modified toxicity probability interval method was used for escalation, with monitoring for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) to end of the first cycle. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (v4.03), and cytokine release syndrome (CRS) by American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy criteria (Lee et al. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019;25:625). Response was assessed by International Myeloma Working Group criteria. Pharmacokinetics, cytokine profiling, and T cell immunophenotyping were performed. Results: 30 pts had received elranatamab as of 4-Aug-2020 at 80 (n = 6), 130 (n = 4), 215 (n = 4), 360 (n = 4), 600 (n = 6), or 1000 (n = 6) μg/kg SC weekly. Pts had a median of 8 prior treatments; 87% had triple refractory disease, 97% had prior anti-CD38 therapy, and 23% had prior BCMA-directed antibody drug conjugate or chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy. The most common all causality TEAEs included lymphopenia (n = 24, 80%; 20% G3, 60% G4), CRS (n = 22, 73%; none > G2), anemia (n = 17, 57%; 43% G3, 3% G4), injection site reaction (n = 16, 53%; none > G2), thrombocytopenia (n = 16, 53%; 23% G3, 17% G4), and neutropenia (n = 12, 40%; 17% G3, 17% G4). Both CRS and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (n = 6, 20%) were limited to ≤G2 with median durations of 2 and 1.5 days, respectively. No DLT was observed. Exposure increased with dose, and Tmax ranged from 3–7 days. Cytokine increases occurred with the first dose, and increased T-cell proliferation was observed in peripheral blood. The overall response rate (ORR) for doses ≥215μg/kg was 75% (n = 15/20) including partial response (PR; n = 6), very good PR (VGPR; n = 3), complete response (CR; n = 1), and stringent CR (sCR; n = 5). Median time to response was 22 days, and 3 of 4 pts (75%) with prior BCMA-directed therapy achieved response (VGPR, n = 2 and sCR, n = 1). Updated data, including duration of response, will be presented. Conclusions: Elranatamab demonstrated a manageable safety profile, and SC doses ≥215μg/kg achieved ORR of 75% with CR/sCR rate of 30%. These results demonstrate the safety and efficacy of SC elranatamab in this relapsed/refractory population and support ongoing development of elranatamab for pts with MM, both as monotherapy and in combination with standard or novel therapies. Clinical trial information: NCT03269136.

Introduction: Midostaurin was the first multikinase inhibitor approved in combination with daunorubicin and cytarabine induction and high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC) consolidation chemotherapy for the treatment of adults with newly diagnosed FLT3-mutation-positive (mut+) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Approval was largely based on the results from the phase 3 RATIFY trial; patients who received midostaurin had significantly improved overall and event-free survival than those who received placebo (Stone et al, N Engl J Med, 2017). RADIUS-X (NCT02624570) is an expanded treatment protocol (ETP) designed to provide access to midostaurin during the US Food and Drug Administration's review process and to extend the understanding of the safety and tolerability of midostaurin in patients with newly diagnosed FLT3-mut+ AML. The safety profile of midostaurin in preliminary data from RADIUS-X was consistent with that in the RATIFY study (Roboz et al, Blood, 2017 [abstract 1338]). Here we report updated safety data for midostaurin during induction and consolidation and safety data during the maintenance phase. Methods: In this open-label, single-arm ETP, patients (aged ≥18 years) received 1-2 cycles of induction therapy (cytarabine plus daunorubicin [60-90 mg/m2/day] or idarubicin [12 mg/m2/day]) and up to 4 cycles of HiDAC consolidation chemotherapy plus midostaurin (50 mg twice daily [bid] on days 8-21 of each 28-day cycle), followed by up to 12 months of single-agent midostaurin (50 mg bid on days 1-28). Patients could enroll at any point before completion of a second cycle of consolidation. Patients achieving complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) after induction proceeded to consolidation; patients who maintained a response were eligible to proceed to maintenance. The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability of midostaurin. Results: Of 111 patients screened, 103 were enrolled in the study: 47 during induction (46%) and 56 during consolidation (54%) (Figure). The median age was 58 y (range, 19-79 y); all patients were FLT3-mut+ (Table). Of 47 patients enrolled during induction, 15 received daunorubicin and 32 received idarubicin as the anthracycline. Of 35 patients who completed consolidation and entered maintenance, 9 had completed the protocol treatment and 3 remained on therapy at the data cutoff date (March 30, 2018). The CR/CRi rate for the induction phase was 74% (57% CR, 17% CRi). The relapse rate was 14% overall. The most common reason for study discontinuation was proceeding to transplant (overall, 52%; induction, 11%; consolidation, 42%; maintenance, 34%). The median duration of midostaurin exposure was 35 days (range, 3-426 days). Dose adjustment or interruption due to adverse events (AEs) occurred in 26 patients, most commonly due to febrile neutropenia (n=9) and gastrointestinal disorders (n=6). No new safety events were observed with longer follow-up. Most patients (99%) experienced ≥1 any-grade AE, mostly during induction and/or consolidation. Due to the timing of patient enrollment (up to the second cycle of consolidation), hematologic AEs were lower than reported in comparable studies. The most common AEs occurring in ≥20% of patients were febrile neutropenia (53%), nausea (42%), diarrhea (37%), anemia (36%), platelet count decreased (31%), fatigue (23%), headache (22%), and vomiting (22%). Serious AEs occurred in 50% of patients overall, most commonly febrile neutropenia (37%). AEs during induction were generally similar, regardless of anthracycline received. Overall, 9 patients discontinued due to AEs: 5 during induction (febrile neutropenia, blood bilirubin increased, electrocardiogram QT prolonged, renal impairment, and respiratory distress), 1 during consolidation (sepsis), and 1 during maintenance (leukocytosis). During maintenance, 16 of 35 patients (46%) reported any-grade AEs with midostaurin monotherapy; the most common any-grade and grade 3/4 AEs occurring in >1 patient were platelet count decrease (11% and 3%), nausea (9% and 0%), and oropharyngeal pain (6% and 0%).The rate of death during the study was low, with 1 death reported (disease progression). Conclusions: Midostaurin continued to demonstrate a manageable safety profile with longer follow-up and was associated with high transplant and low relapse rates. Maintenance therapy with midostaurin was well tolerated; no new safety signals were observed. Disclosures Perl: Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Arog: Consultancy; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Actinium Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Consultancy; NewLink Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sweet:Agios: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Roboz:Novartis: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Eisai: Consultancy; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Argenx: Consultancy; Orsenix: Consultancy; Aphivena Therapeutics: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy; Orsenix: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Celltrion: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Celltrion: Consultancy; Cellectis: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Sandoz: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Eisai: Consultancy; Aphivena Therapeutics: Consultancy; Argenx: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Cellectis: Research Funding; Sandoz: Consultancy. Strickland:Astellas Pharma: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Baxalta: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CTI Biopharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bonifacio:Novartis: Employment. Haines:Novartis: Employment. Barbera:Novartis: Employment. Purkayastha:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment.

Background Multiple studies have shown the clinical activity of alvocidib followed by cytarabine and mitoxantrone in newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML. Alvocidib's anti-leukemic pharmacologic activity appears to be predominantly due to the inhibition of transcriptional regulator, CDK9, resulting in suppression of CDK9-regulated genes, such as the BCL-2 family member, MCL-1. Pre-treatment bone marrow samples from newly diagnosed AML patients revealed an increased sensitivity to alvocidib in those with MCL-1 dependence of ≥40% as measured by a BH3 profiling biomarker assay (J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 suppl; 7062). Thus, we hypothesized that alvocidib, followed by cytarabine and mitoxantrone, may be preferentially active in those with MCL-1 dependence (≥ 40%). Here, the findings from stage 1 of the Zella 201 trial in which this biomarker assay is used to select for patients with MCL-1 dependence, are reported. Aims To evaluate the efficacy and safety of alvocidib, in combination with cytarabine and mitoxantrone, in MCL-1 dependent R/R AML patients. Methods The key eligibility criteria were: ages 18-65 years; refractory to 1-2 cycles of induction therapy, or in first relapse AML with complete remission (CR) duration ≤ 2 years; ≥ 40% myeloblast MCL-1 dependency determined by BH3 profiling; ECOG PS 0-2; and no major organ dysfunction. Patients who received prior allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) were eligible, if it was greater than two months after SCT and there was no active GVHD. Treatment consisted of alvocidib 30 mg/m2 as a 30-minute IV bolus followed by 60 mg/m2 over 4 hours on Days 1-3, cytarabine 667 mg/m2/day by continuous IV infusion days 6-8, and mitoxantrone 40 mg/m2 IV on day 9 starting 12 hours after completing cytarabine. Up to 3 additional cycles of the same regimen (with or without mitoxantrone) were permittedin responders. The primary endpoint was the rate of CR+CR with incomplete recovery (CRi). Stage I was determined to be positive if ≥13 CRs were seenin the first 23 evaluable patients. Key secondary endpoints were overall survival, event-freesurvival, the combinedresponse rate and safety assessed by adverse events and laboratory results. Results A total of 163 patients were screened, of which 47 (29%) were determined to be MCL-1 dependent. Of these, 25 patients were enrolledin Stage 1 (Table 1), with 21 evaluable for response. Median MCL-1 dependence score was 55% (range: 41-98%). Of the 21 evaluable patients, 11 (52%) were refractory to frontline therapy (resistant disease or CR < 90d). The overall CR/CRi rate in evaluable patients was 62% (13/21) meeting the primary endpoint of stage 1. Seven out of 11 (64%) patients with primary refractory disease achieved a CR and five of these patients proceeded to an alloSCT. Overall, 10 patients received a post-study alloSCT. The most common NCI CTCAE ≥Grade 3treatment-emergent nonhematologic AEs noted in >1 patient in the safety population (n=25) were tumor lysis syndrome (20% Grade 3, 8% Grade 4); diarrhea (24% Grade 3); increased AST (12% Grade 3, 8% Grade 4), sepsis (16% Grade 5, 4% Grade 4); and peripheral edema, (8% Grade 3). To date, overall 30- and 60-day mortality rates were 16% and 20%, respectively, due to sepsis (n=4), and mitral valve rupture (n=1). Conclusion Our findings indicate that alvocidib given beforecytarabine and mitoxantrone in MCL-1-dependent AML has clinical activity, particularly in those refractory to frontline therapy. Given these findings, stage 2 of the Zella 201 trial has been initiated,randomizing patients to alvocidib, cytarabine, and mitoxantrone versus cytarabine and mitoxantrone alone in MCL-1 dependent R/R AML. Furthermore, a Phase Ib study of alvocidib followed by 7+3 induction in newly diagnosed AML (Zella 101) is being conducted. Disclosures Zeidner: Rafael Pharmaceuticals: Other: Travel Fees; Takeda: Other: Travel fees, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Asystbio Laboratories: Consultancy; Tolero: Honoraria, Other: Travel Fees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria. Lin:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Wang:Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy. Levy:Takeda (Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.): Consultancy. Montesinos:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Anthony:Tolero Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Employment. Bearss:Tolero Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Employment.

Metabolic syndrome constitutes a constellation of findings including central obesity, insulin resistance/type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), dyslipidemia and hypertension. Metabolic syndrome affects 1 in 4 adults in the United States and is rapidly rising in prevalence, largely driven by the dramatic rise in obesity and insulin resistance/DM. Being central to the development of metabolic syndrome and its other related diseases, much focus has been placed on identifying the mitogenic effects of obesity and insulin resistance/DM as mechanistic clues of the link between metabolic syndrome and cancer. Pertinent mechanisms identified include altered lipid signaling, adipokine and inflammatory cytokine effects, and activation of PI3K/Akt/mTOR and RAS/RAF/MAPK/ERK pathways via dysregulated insulin/insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) signaling. Through variable activation of these multiple pathways, obesity and insulin resistance/DM pre-dispose to hematologic malignancies, imposing the aggressive and chemo-resistant phenotypes typically seen in cancer patients with underlying metabolic syndrome. Growing understanding of these pathways has identified druggable cancer targets, rationalizing the development and testing of agents like PI3K inhibitor idelalisib, mTOR inhibitors everolimus and temsirolimus, and IGF-1 receptor inhibitor linsitinib. It has also led to exploration of obesity and diabetes-directed therapies including statins and oral hypoglycemic for the management of metabolic syndrome-related hematologic neoplasms.

Background: The objective of this study was to identify serum biomarkers capable of identifying which advanced NSCLC patients are likely to receive clinical benefit from erlotinib therapy regardless of EGFR mutational status. Although patients harboring tumors with specific EGFR activating mutations are more likely to respond to erlotinib treatment, randomized clinical trials have shown that 30-40%of patients with wild-type EGFRs may also receive clinical benefit in the form of stable disease. Our general approach uses bioinformatic algorithms on gene expression microarray data to predict which tumor-shed biomarkers to assay for in the circulation. Methods and materials: Affymetrix U133A gene expression data (.CEL files) from Balko, et al. (BMC Cancer. 2009; 9: 145) were preprocessed in R using RMA and tested for differential expression using the Significance Analysis of Microarray (SAM) package. Pathway analysis was performed on the results based on KEGG and Gene ontogeny (GO) to define gene sets and tested for categorical significance by performing a Fisher Exact test. From these results, a selection of gene products either known or predicted to be secreted into circulation were combined with an assortment of previously investigated cancer biomarkers for further evaluation. Using pre-treatment serum from a total of 155 patients with advanced NSCLC we evaluated 43 biomarkers using the following MILLIPLEX®MAP immunoassay kits: Human Circulating Cancer Biomarker 24-plex, Human Soluble Cytokine Receptor 14-plex, and Human MMP panel 2 5-plex. Overall survival (OS) using the log rank test was the primary outcome for this study. Result: Preliminary single biomarker statistical analysis revealed a total of 23 prognostic biomarkers correlated (1p Conclusion: These serum biomarkers could be used to define a contingency-based algorithm that would ultimately be implemented alone or in tandem with a EGFR mutation analysis to provide a comprehensive means to both identify patients not likely to benefit from costly therapy and also allow patients to receive less toxic therapy earlier in their treatment course. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 339. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-339