Linha de pesquisa: Hist?ria, Cultura e Arqueologia. Submitted by Jos? Henrique Henrique (jose.neves@ufvjm.edu.br) on 2020-09-17T19:50:56Z No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) wellington_santos_greco.pdf: 11059525 bytes, checksum: e7e1321e03368b03b476c079d921d0ca (MD5) Approved for entry into archive by Jos? Henrique Henrique (jose.neves@ufvjm.edu.br) on 2020-09-17T19:56:01Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) wellington_santos_greco.pdf: 11059525 bytes, checksum: e7e1321e03368b03b476c079d921d0ca (MD5) Made available in DSpace on 2020-09-17T19:56:01Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) wellington_santos_greco.pdf: 11059525 bytes, checksum: e7e1321e03368b03b476c079d921d0ca (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 Foram analisados sete s?tios de arte rupestre localizados no munic?pio de Fel?cio dos Santos, Alto Ara?ua?, Vale do Jequitinhonha, Minas Gerais. Em perspectiva interdisciplinar, o arcabou?o te?rico da an?lise se organizou em tr?s conceitos metodol?gicos primeiros: estrutura, paisagem e estilo. O seu objetivo central foi a investiga??o de combina??es recorrentes nos pain?is tomadas enquanto indicadores de um determinado processo de estrutura??o, tendo o estilo enquanto premissa e a arte como produ??o t?cnica de atribui??o simb?lica, que ? integrante e marca da paisagem. Uma vez que a paisagem ocorre junto ? a??o, os tr?s conceitos norteadores se fecham em um c?rculo de an?lise que se movimenta sob a categoria de arte, sendo, ent?o, todos tomados n?o s? enquanto teoria, mas como m?todo, cumprindo assim a prerrogativa da investiga??o interdisciplinar. ? sobre esse movimento que versa esta disserta??o, que tem nos resultados alcan?ados o veio de discuss?o. Tamb?m se deteve a investigar quais rela??es podem ser tecidas entre os s?tios e os vest?gios rupestres buscando observar as particularidades que constitu?ram e podem ter limitado, condicionado ou orientado a(s) escolha(s) ou padr?o(?es) de organiza??o dos pain?is rupestres e, assim, da(s) (re)constru??o(?es) da paisagem. Para tanto, se deteve ?s figuras, em an?lise sincr?nica e diacr?nica, partindo do conceito de estrutura. Posto que essas rela??es se imbricam e coexistem na constitui??o e manuten??o de um todo coeso e coerente, ainda que din?mico. Esse movimento tamb?m foi analisado e ? um dos resultados que se apresenta. A pesquisa se decorreu em tr?s trabalhos concomitantes: atividades de campo, an?lises em laborat?rio e estudo bibliogr?fico. Em campo, o registro da arte rupestre se deu por fotografia e descri??o categ?rica. Cada figura foi detalhadamente analisada em suas caracter?sticas intr?nsecas de mat?ria-prima, cor, t?cnica de execu??o, desenho, forma e disposi??o no painel, em considera??o com outras figuras. Essas disposi??es de localiza??o das figuras no painel tamb?m receberam aten??o, principalmente em raz?o de ser a arte rupestre um registro fixado, fator que possibilitou a an?lise segura sobre as combina??es, ainda que, como cumpre ressaltar, apenas sinais estejam na rocha. Por isso, defendeu-se o estudo enquanto an?lise de s?mbolos, sob a ?nfase de que o que se tem s?o vest?gios e as rela??es que aconteceram, se deram e ocorrem, foram e s?o fenomenol?gicas. Pela aplica??o do m?todo, mesmo que a an?lise n?o se feche em uma considera??o ?nica sobre a arte rupestre dos s?tios em quest?o, os resultados alcan?ados sob tal abordagem te?rica conferem a hip?tese da exist?ncia de organiza??o comum nos pain?is dos s?tios estudados, havendo um modo estil?stico de composi??o e conforma??o da paisagem da Serra baseado em espec?fico dinamismo que possibilita, viabiliza e sustenta determinada estrutura emergente das combina??es art?sticas. Assim, n?o apenas se evidencia conven??es gr?ficas, como tamb?m elucida acordos culturais conjecturados nos/com/pelos vest?gios. Nessa perspectiva, arte e paisagem n?o foram dialeticamente ou dicotomicamente verificadas, mas entendidas juntas como s?mbolos ocorrentes em inter-rela??es fenomenol?gicas envolvidas. Destarte, uma ? tanto e como a outra enquanto aquela for. Mesmo que dividido em tr?s cap?tulos, um de car?ter mais te?rico, outro sobre a metodologia desenvolvida e um terceiro de apresenta??o e discuss?o sobre os resultados, em suma, todo o texto sublinha o quanto a arte ocorre (tamb?m) n?o presa ? rocha, ainda que n?o (se) exista em movimentos arbitr?rios e de todo desprendidos. Em raz?o disso, al?m de se somarem aos resultados de outras pesquisas e conhecimentos sobre a presen?a humana pr?-contato no Alto Jequitinhonha, acredita-se que os dados gerados podem contribuir com perspectivas te?ricas, mantendo a ci?ncia em igual din?mica no movimento de defesa de sua autonomia e qualidade, via democracia. Disserta??o (Mestrado Profissional) ? Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Ci?ncias Humanas, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, 2019. Seven rock art sites located in the municipality of Fel?cio dos Santos, Alto Ara?ua?, Vale do Jequitinhonha, Minas Gerais were analyzed. In an interdisciplinary perspective, the theoretical framework of the analysis was organized into three first methodological concepts: structure, landscape and style. Its central objective was the investigation of recurring combinations in the panels taken as indicators of a certain structuring process, having style as a premise and art as a technical production of symbolic attribution, which is integral and marks the landscape. Once the landscape occurs together with action, the three guiding concepts close in a circle of analysis that moves under the category of art, being then all taken not only as theory, but method itself, thus fulfilling the prerogative of interdisciplinary research. It is about this movement that this dissertation deals, which has in the results achieved the vein of discussion. It also stopped to investigate what relationships can be woven between the sites and the rupestrian remains, seeking to observe the particularities that have constituted and may have limited, conditioned or oriented the choice(s) or pattern(s) of organization of the rupestrian panels and, thus, the (re)construction(s) of the landscape. To this end, the figures, in synchronic and diachronic analysis, were stopped, starting from the concept of structure, in which these relationships intertwine and coexist in the constitution and maintenance of a cohesive and coherent, albeit dynamic, whole. This movement was also analyzed and is one of the results that is presented. The research was carried out in three concomitant works: field activities, laboratory analysis and bibliographic study. In the field, the registration of rock art was done through photography and categorical description. Each figure was analyzed in detail in its intrinsic characteristics of raw material, color, technique of execution, design, shape and arrangement in the panel, in consideration with other figures. These arrangements for locating the figures in the panel also received attention, mainly because the rock art is a fixed register, a factor that enabled safe analysis of the combinations, although, as should be noted, only signs are in the rock. Therefore, the study was defended as an analysis of symbols, under the emphasis that what we have are traces and the relationships that have happened, if given and occur were and are phenomenological. By applying the method, even if the analysis does not close in a single consideration on the rock art of the sites in question, the results achieved under such theoretical approach confer the hypothesis of the existence of common organization in the panels of the sites studied, with a stylistic way of composition and conformation of the landscape of the Sierra based on specific dynamism that enables, enables and supports certain emerging structure of artistic combinations. Thus, not only is graphic conventions evident, but also cultural agreements conjecturing in/by vestiges are elucidated. In this perspective, art and landscape were not dialectically or dichotomously verified, but understood together as symbols occurring in phenomenological interrelations involved. Thus, one is as much and the other as long as the other is. Even if divided into three chapters, one of a more theoretical character, another on the methodology developed and a third of presentation and discussion on the results, in short, the whole text underlines how much art occurs (also) not attached to the rock, even if it does not (if) exist in arbitrary and completely detached movements. Because of this, in addition to being added to the results of other research and knowledge on the pre-contact human presence in Alto Jequitinhonha, it is believed that the data generated can contribute to theoretical perspectives, keeping science in equal dynamics, in the movement of defense of its autonomy and quality, via democracy.