S. Daia-Iliescu, C. Cobilinschi, Ioana Saulescu, Florian Berghea, M. M. Negru, Cosmin Constantinescu, Daniela Opris-Belinski, Violeta Bojinca, Andra Balanescu, Mihai Abobului, Laura Groseanu, Ruxandra Ionescu, Andreea Borangiu, and D. Mazilu
Background:The low overall prevalence of systemic sclerosis (SSc) and the low proportion of male patients have resulted in a scarcity of studies assessing sex differences in SSc patients, and contradictory results.Objectives:To evaluated sex influence on disease characteristics at baseline and then to estimate the effects of sex on disease progression and survival.Methods:We performed a retrospective observational study using data extract from the EULAR scleroderma trials and research (EUSTAR) cohort 096. 173 patients were analysed (26 males).The severity of organ system involvement was defined as described previously (1).Results:Males were significantly older at symptom onset (p=0.007) and at first center visit (p=0.009). There were no differences regarding disease duration at first visit or the interval between the onset of Raynaud syndrome and other non-Raynaud manifestations (p=0.06). Male patients were significantly more likely to have ever smoked (pIn multivariate analysis, male sex was independently associated with a higher risk of diffuse cutaneous subtype (OR: 1.56, (1.35 to 1.84); pConclusion:In essence, the disease prophyle in females is that of younger age of onset, longer disease duration at first center visit, less severe peripheral vascular involvement, the most frequent cause of death being PAH. In contrast, males are older at onset, present earlier in their disease, have dcSSc, more severe peripheral vascular disease, higher mRSS, more frequent and severe ILD, more frequent heart involvement, higher risk of PAH and SRC, the most common cause of death being ILD. These results raise the point of including sex in the management and the decision-making process.References:[1]Peoples C, Medsger TA Jr, Lucas M et al Gender differences in systemic sclerosis: relationship to clinical features, serologic status and outcomes.J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2016;1(2):177–240Disclosure of Interests:Laura Groseanu Speakers bureau: novartis, eli-lilly, ucb, pfizer,sandoz, Andra Balanescu Consultant of: pfizer, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Eli-Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, UCB, Violeta Bojinca Speakers bureau: Eli-Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Daniela Opris-Belinski Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Eli-Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Ioana Saulescu Speakers bureau: Eli-Lilly, Pfizer, Diana Mazilu: None declared, Sanziana Daia-Iliescu Speakers bureau: sandoz, Andreea Borangiu: None declared, Florian Berghea Paid instructor for: abbvie, Speakers bureau: gideon richter, egis, novartis,ucb, cosmin-laurentiu constantinescu: None declared, CLAUDIA COBILINSCHI Speakers bureau: novartis, Maria Magdalena Negru: None declared, mihai abobului Speakers bureau: gideon richter, Ruxandra Ionescu Consultant of: Consulting fees from Abbvie, Eli-Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Speakers bureau: Consulting and speaker fees from Abbvie, Eli-Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz