Search

Although aberrant salience (AS) is a putative vulnerability factor in schizophrenia, empirical research on AS in early stages of psychosis is currently relatively scarce (especially as regards on its longitudinal course and treatment response in adolescence). The aim of the present study was to longitudinally monitor the stability of AS along a 1-year follow-up period in an Italian population of community help-seeking adolescents with First Episode Psychosis (FEP) or at Ultra-High Risk (UHR) of psychosis and to examine any relevant association of AS with specific treatment components of a specialized “Early Intervention in Psychosis” (EIP) program across the 1 year of follow-up. Participants (38 FEP, 42 UHR), aged 13-18 years, completed the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS) and the Aberrant Salience Inventory (ASI) both at baseline and at the end of the follow-up period. Spearman's correlations between AS scores and specific EIP treatment components were performed. After the 1 year of follow-up, both FEP and UHR adolescents showed a statistically significant reduction in AS levels. In FEP patients, this was correlated to the number of psychoeducational sessions provided to their family members. In the UHR subgroup, this AS decrease was associated with the number of individual Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) sessions directly offered to help-seeking adolescents. AS is relevant both in FEP and UHR adolescents already at the enrollment in specialized EIP programs. However, its longitudinal levels decrease over time, together with the delivery of specific psychosocial EIP interventions.

The prescription of antipsychotics in young children and adolescents is a delicate, complex, and often divisive issue, where official guidelines and real-world prescriptive habits seldom correspond.1 Such discrepancy is even more radical and excruciating in those conditions with an established higher risk of imminent development of an overt psychotic state (ie, Clinical High Risk for Psychosis [CHR-P] and the related diagnostic construct of DSM-5 Attenuated Psychosis Syndrome [APS]) that fall below the severity threshold for a DSM-5 diagnosis of schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders.

The experiential core of the obsessive mind rests on subtle, primary mental phenomena (such as obsessions and so called “sensory phenomena”) which precede and trigger behavioral compulsions. Converging evidence supports a possible pathophysiological role for altered corollary discharge (phenotypically expressed in sensorimotor symptoms and contributing to a reduced Sense of Agency [SoA]), in the neurodevelopment of obsessions and “sensory phenomena.” In phenomenological terms, “sensory phenomena” may represent the subjective experiential resonance of an individual history of persistent inaccurate sensory predictions, whereas accompanying manifestations, such as the obsessive need for order and symmetry, may represent a compensatory attempt to mitigate “sensory phenomena” (eg, by increasing the sensory predictability of the surrounding world). Since disturbances of both SoA and Sense of Ownership have been thematized as potential pathogenetic factors in the neurodevelopment of the psychotic mind, a dimensional account of altered sensorimotor prediction may partly explain the affinities (and high comorbidity) between obsessive–compulsive disorder and schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

Aim Recently, there has been increasing interest in providing Personal Health Budgets (PHBs) to patients with severe mental illness. However, information on implementing PHB initiatives is still limited. Aim of this observational study was to evaluate the applicability of a PHB intervention model in a sample of Italian adults with first-episode psychosis (FEP) across a 2-year follow-up period. Methods Participants (n = 104; 18-50 years) were recruited within the 'Parma-Early Psychosis' program and completed the brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS), the health of nation outcome scale (HoNOS) and the global assessment of functioning (GAF). Mixed-design analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Kaplan-Maier survival analysis (as drop-out measure) were performed. Results A significant effect of time on all BPRS, HoNOS and GAF scores along the follow-up was observed in both the FEP subgroups (i.e., with [n = 49] and without [n = 55] PHB intervention). Mixed-design ANOVA results showed a significant 'time x group' interaction effects on BPRS 'Disorganization', HoNOS 'Psychiatric Symptoms' and GAF scores in FEP participants with PHB. Kaplan-Meyer survival analysis showed a longer survival mean for FEP patients with PHB. Conclusions Our results support the applicability of a PHB model within an 'Early Intervention in Psychosis' program in public community mental health services.

Background Emerging meta-analytical evidence indicates that baseline exposure to antipsychotics in individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis (CHR-P) is associated with a higher risk of an imminent transition to psychosis. Despite their tolerability profile and potential beneficial effects, baseline exposure to antidepressants (AD) in CHR-P has surprisingly received far less attention as a potential risk modulator for transition to psychosis. The current systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to fix such a knowledge gap. Methods Systematic scrutiny of Medline and Cochrane library, performed up to 1 August 2021, searching for English-language studies on CHR-P reporting numeric data about the sample, the transition outcome at a predefined follow-up time and raw data on AD baseline exposure in relation to such outcome. Results Of 1942 identified records, 16 studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. 26% of the participants were already exposed to AD at baseline; at the end of the follow-up 13.5% (95% CI 10.2–17.1%) of them (n = 448) transitioned to psychosis against 21.0% (18.9 to 23.3%) of non-AD exposed CHR-P (n = 1371). CHR-P participants who were already under AD treatment at baseline had a lower risk of transition than non-AD exposed CHR-P. The RR was 0.71 (95% CI 0.56–0.90) in the fixed-effects model (z = −2.79; p = 0.005), and 0.78 (0.58–1.05) in the random-effects model (z = −1.77; p = 0.096; tau-squared = 0.059). There was no relevant heterogeneity (Cochran's Q = 18.45; df = 15; p = 0.239; I2 = 18.7%). Conclusions Ongoing AD exposure at inception in CHR-P is associated to a reduced risk of transition to psychosis at follow up.

Aim Identifying discrete dimensions that underline negative symptoms in First Episode Psychosis (FEP) could improve the understanding and the treatment of such invalidating symptomatology. The aim of this study is to examine the negative symptom structure in FEP individuals and to compare the resulting factor configurations between FEP subjects with and without Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders (SSD vs non-SSD). Methods One hundred and seventy participants (88 SSD and 82 non-SSD), aged 13-35 years, completed the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS) and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). A principal component analysis was then performed to investigate PANSS negative symptom structure in both non-SSD and SSD groups. Results Whereas in the SSD sample a 3-factor model solution (i.e., "Socio-Emotional Disengagement", "Motor/Thought Poverty", and "Avolition/Apathy" dimensions) was identified, a 2-factor model solution (with a mixed alogia/avolition domain in addition to a mixed socio-emotional disengagement/expressive deficits dimension) appeared more appropriate in the non-SSD group. Conclusions Our results show a relevant difference in the negative symptom factor structure between SSD and non-SSD individuals. In particular, a different specificity and significance of negative symptom models in FEP populations with diagnoses other than schizophrenia (compared to those with SSD) must be realistically considered. Notably, a "Motor/Thought Poverty" domain, which specifically includes alogia and motor retardation separately from the other PANSS negative items, appears to specifically characterize FEP young patients with the schizophrenia spectrum.

Background Suicide risk is high in first episode schizophrenia. Little data are available in young individuals at Ultra-High Risk (UHR) of psychosis. Purposes of the study were: (1) to assess prevalence and incidence rates of suicide attempts, suicidal ideation, and completed suicide in UHR individuals compared with First Episode Psychosis (FEP) and non-FEP/UHR help-seeking peers at baseline and over a 24-month follow-up time, and (2) to explore any association of suicidal ideation with other psychopathological parameters at baseline. Methods 273 young people (13–35 years) were evaluated with the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS), the Beck Depression Inventory – II Edition (BDI), and the World Health Organization Quality Of Life scale – Brief version (WHOQOL-BREF). The BDI item 9 cut-off score of ≥1 dichotomized the presence/absence of suicidal ideation. Results UHR individuals showed more severe suicidal ideation and a higher percentage of individuals with a history of attempted suicide than FEP and non-UHR/FEP samples, and a higher 2-year incidence rate of suicide attempts than non-UHR/FEP subjects. No inter-group differences in incidence rates of completed suicide were found. In the UHR group, suicidal ideation was associated with BDI-II and CAARMS “Anhedonia” scores, and showed a negative correlation with all WHOQOL-BREF scores. Conclusions Suicidal ideation is frequent in UHR subjects, supporting the routine monitoring of suicide risk in people at risk of psychosis. Suicide risk is correlated with severity of depression and anhedonia, and with a poorer quality of life.

Background: The majority of models on obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) endorse a top-down perspective on the cognitive mechanisms underlying OCD functioning and maintenance, whereas a bottom-up perspective is rarely pursued. Objectives: The aim of the study was to review the empirical literature on sensory phenomena (SP) and neurodevelopmental antecedents of OCD, which could support the conceptualization of an alternative, bottom-up perspective integrating neurodevelopmental and phenomenological levels of analysis on OCD. Methods: A systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycInfo, the Cochrane Library, and Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE) and focused on SP and “neurodevelopmental antecedents” (operationalized in early risk factors, neuroimaging signs, neurological soft signs, and sensory responsivity). The time interval was from inception up to March 31, 2022. Results: From the search in electronic databases, 48 studies were retained and reviewed. SP are highly prevalent in OCD patients and overrepresented in comparison with healthy controls. Similarly, OCD patients also present a higher prevalence of early environmental adversities and sensorimotor alterations in terms of neurological soft signs and sensory over-responsivity in the tactile and acoustic domains; additional findings included hypogyrification signs at neuroimaging. Both sensorimotor alterations and SP are associated with tic-related manifestations and poorer insight in OCD patients. Conclusions: On the ground of established common subjective experience of SP and premorbid neurodevelopmental features, we hypothesized an explanatory model for OCD, which considers the possible pathophysiological role for altered corollary discharge and enhanced error detection in the neurodevelopment of SP and obsessions. SP may represent the subjective experiential resonance of an individual history of persistently inaccurate sensory predictions, whereas accompanying manifestations, such as the obsessive need for order and symmetry, may represent a compensatory attempt to mitigate SP. This neurodevelopmental-phenomenological bottom-up model, describing a dimensional gradient of sensorimotor alterations and related subjective experiences, may contribute to explain the dimensional affinity between OCD and schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Furthermore, this model could be useful for the early detection of subjects at higher risk of OCD.

Background The prescription of antipsychotics outside overt psychotic conditions remains controversial, especially in youth where it is relatively widespread. Furthermore, some studies seem to indicate that antipsychotic exposure in individuals at ultra-high-risk (UHR) for psychosis is associated with higher conversion rates. This study was set up to test whether the inter-current prescription of antipsychotics in UHR patients was related to the psychometric threshold for a diagnosis of psychosis. Methods The 24-item Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) was used to quantify treatment response up to 2 years in 125 UHR participants. Standard psychometric criteria were used to quantify conversion to psychosis. Kaplan-Mayer and Cox proportional hazard survival analysis were applied to determine the impact of having or not received the prescription of an antipsychotic drug. Results Over the study period 30 (24%) subjects received the prescription of an antipsychotic. In the sample, there were 31 participants (25%) who had reached the psychometric threshold for conversion to psychosis after 2 years of treatment. UHR people who received a prescription of antipsychotics during the first 2 years of treatment were statistically more likely to reach the psychometric threshold for conversion to psychosis on the BPRS: Hazard ratio = 3.03 (95%CI: 1.49-6.16); p = .003. Conclusion This finding supports the hypothesis that the prescription of antipsychotics within UHR cohorts is to be considered a red flag for higher incipient risk of conversion to psychosis.

Christoph U Correll,1– 3 Paolo Fusar-Poli,4– 6 Stefan Leucht,7 Anne Karow,8 Nadja Maric,9 Carmen Moreno,10 Merete Nordentoft,11 Andrea Raballo12,13 1Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; 2Department of Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA; 3Department of Psychiatry, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY, USA; 4Early Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical-detection (EPIC) Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK; 5OASIS service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; 6Department of Brain and Behavioural Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; 7Section Evidence-Based Medicine in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany; 8Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; 9Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade and Institute of Mental Health, Belgrade, Serbia; 10Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, IiSGM, CIBERSAM, Madrid, Spain; 11CORE-Copenhagen Research Centre for Mental Health, Mental Health Services in the Capital Region, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; 12Section of Psychiatry, Clinical Psychology and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy; 13Centre for Translational, Phenomenological and Developmental Psychopathology (CTPDP), Perugia University Hospital, Perugia, ItalyCorrespondence: Christoph U CorrellDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, 13353, Germany, Tel +49-30-450-566202, Fax +49-30-450-566921, Email christoph.correll@charite.dePurpose: Although first-episode psychosis (FEP) in youth, particularly early-onset schizophrenia (EOS), is managed similarly to adult-onset schizophrenia, few antipsychotics are approved for people aged 13– 18 years. We aimed to explore areas of uncertainty in EOS management and provide evidence-based recommendations to mental health specialists. We used the Delphi methodology to gain knowledge in areas lacking evidence-based strategies. This standardized methodology consists of the development of a questionnaire by content experts, which is then submitted to a broader panel of professionals (panelists) to survey their level of agreement on the topics proposed.Materials and Methods: The developed questionnaire covered patient management from diagnosis to maintenance treatment and was administered to a broader panel of specialists across Europe. Based on an analysis of responses received in this first round, the items that needed further insight were submitted to the panel for a second round and then reanalysed.Results: An initial set of 90 items was developed; in round I, consensus was reached for 83/90 items (92%), while it was reached for 7/11 (64%) of the items sent out for rerating in round II. Feedback for rounds I and II was obtained from 54/92 and 48/54 approached experts, respectively. There was broad agreement on diagnostic standards, multimodal approaches and focus on adverse events, but uncertainty in terms of pharmacological strategies (including clozapine) in case of failure and antipsychotic dosing in younger patients.Conclusion: Despite knowledge about diagnostic clues and integrated management of EOS, this study highlights the lack of standardization in treating EOS, with safety arguments having a major role in the decision-making process. Targeted clinical trials and systematic dissemination across Europe of current scientific evidence on the value of early intervention services is hoped to contribute to standardized and improved quality care for patients with early-phase psychosis and schizophrenia.Keywords: schizophrenia, Delphi, psychosis, early onset, management

In the wake of the almost quarter of a century since the conceptualization of ultra-high-risk (UHR) states for psychosis, empirical evidences in the field are constantly scrutinized and re-assessed through meta-analytic lens. Briefly, such scrutiny converges on three major evidences: pretest risk enrichment, risk hierarchy within UHR states, and declining transition rates. While the former two are intuitive, the dilution effect remains elusive and might be rather symptomatic of unsolved issues in the field. Those include the heterogeneously reported antipsychotic (AP) exposure in UHR samples and the almost univocal focus on purely psychometric transition to psychosis. Both issues lead to the neglect of functional equivalents of transition, i.e. that of a mental state at immediate need for AP medication, and might have a cascading confounding effect on the predictive value of contemporary risk calculators centered on criterial transition as a unique outcome.

The brain is increasingly viewed in contemporary neuroscience as a predictive machine; its products, such as movements and decisions, are indeed accompanied by predictions of outcomes at distinct levels of awareness. In this conceptual review, we focus on corollary discharge, a basic neurophysiological mechanism that is allegedly involved in sensory prediction and contributes to the distinction between self-generated and externally generated actions. Failures in corollary discharge have been hypothesized as potentially relevant for the progressive development of positive psychotic symptoms such as passivity delusions and auditory verbal hallucinations. We articulate this framework adopting three confocal lenses, namely, the neurodevelopmental, phenomenological, and clinical perspectives. Converging evidence from these research domains indicates a possible developmental cascade leading to increased lifetime risk of psychosis. That is, early childhood alterations of corollary discharge mechanisms, endophenotypically expressed in motor impairment, may concur with a progressive fading of the feeling of self-agency on one's own experiences. Combined with other age-dependent situational challenges occurring along development, this may progressively hamper the ontogenesis of the embodied self, thereby facilitating the emergence of anomalous subjective experiences such as self-disorders (a longitudinal index of schizophrenia spectrum vulnerability) and broadly conceived clinical high-risk states. Overall, this condition increases the risk of developing passivity symptoms, phenotypically expressed in a severity gradient ranging from intrusive thoughts to passivity delusions and auditory verbal hallucinations. Empirical and clinical implications of this framework, as well as future scenarios, are discussed.

Purpose Aberrant salience (AS) is conceptualized as a potential predisposing factor for psychotic states of mind. Despite several studies in the general population, research on AS in the early phases of psychosis is still relatively scarce. The aim of this cross-sectional study is (1) to evaluate the AS subjective experience in Ultra-High Risk (UHR) adolescents and young adults compared to help-seeking peers with First Episode Psychosis (FEP) and (2) to assess any significant association of baseline AS with psychopathology and functioning in UHR participants. Materials and methods Participants (87 UHR and 139 FEP), aged 13-35 years, completed the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS), the Aberrant Salience Inventory (ASI) and the brief version of the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire (SPQ-B). Within the UHR subgroup, Spearman correlation and multiple linear regression analyses among psychopathological parameters were performed. Results No difference in baseline AS subjective levels was found between UHR and FEP participants (median [interquartile range]: 14.50 [7-19] vs 14 [9-21]; z = -1.576; p = 0.115). In UHR individuals, the ASI total score was significantly associated with attenuated positive symptoms (ρ = 0.284, p = 0.008), depression (ρ = 0.256; p = 0.018) and specific schizotypal personality traits (i.e. cognitive-perceptual deficits and disorganization [respectively, ρ = 0.487, p = 0.001, and ρ = 0.295, p = 0.008]). Conclusions AS is clinically relevant in UHR subjects, comparable to FEP patients. Moreover, it seems to mutually interact with schizotypy in the clinical manifestation of attenuated positive psychopathology.

Background Previous studies reported deficits in pleasure experience in schizophrenia, but little is known about anhedonia in psychosis risk syndrome. Aim of this study was: (1) to assess anhedonia in distinct help-seeking subgroups of young people identified through the Ultra-High Risk (UHR) criteria, (2) to explore its association with functioning and psychopathology in the UHR group, and (3) to monitor longitudinally its stability in UHR individuals along 1-year follow-up period. Subjects and methods All participants (78 UHR, 137 with a First Episode Psychosis (FEP), and 95 non-UHR/FEP), aged 13-35 years, completed the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS), the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire - Brief version (SPQ-B), the Brief O-LIFE questionnaire (BOL), and the World Health Organization Quality of Life - Brief version (WHOQOL-BREF). We adopted two different indexes of anhedonia: i.e. CAARMS "Anhedonia" item 4.3 and BOL "Introvertive Anhedonia" subscale scores. Results In comparison with non-UHR/FEP, UHR individuals showed higher baseline CAARMS item 4.3 and BOL "Introvertive Anhedonia" subscale scores. No difference in anhedonia scores between UHR and FEP patients was found. After 1-year follow-up period, UHR subjects had a significant decrease in severity exclusively on CAARMS item 4.3 subscore. Conclusions In the UHR group, CAARMS anhedonia showed significant correlations with functioning deterioration, negative symptoms, and comorbid depression (including suicide ideation), while BOL anhedonia with a poorer self-perceived quality of life and specific schizotypal personality traits (i.e. interpersonal deficits and disorganization). Anhedonia is prominent in the psychosis risk syndrome and its severity is indistinguishable from that of FEP patients.

The diagnostic criteria for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) have undergone minor changes in DSM-5 yet a major turnaround intervened in the overarching categorical allocation. OCD indeed has been separated from the anxiety disorders and included in an autonomous class of OCD-related disorders. Converging factors, i.e., the specificity of the clinical phenotype, the robust evidence for familial aggregation, the availability of effective treatments, and the increasing awareness of the role of environmental factors in its onset and course make OCD a suited target for tailored early intervention programs. However, studies on the topic are still scarce and OCD remains marginally conceptualized within an overdue early detection/intervention framework. Starting from the consolidated clinical evidence of OCD extensive comorbidity with schizophrenia-spectrum and bipolar disorders, we articulate a strategic proposal for a more integral incorporation of OCD within early detection and intervention paradigm.

Disturbed self-experience has been reported as a characteristic feature of schizophrenia since the first formulation of its diagnostic concept; however, only in the last 2 decades an explicit notion of basic Self-disturbance, or Self-Disorders (SD), has emerged as target for a systematic research program. We conducted systematic searches in bibliographical databases to identify cross-sectional studies that explored SD across different diagnostic groups and explored diagnostic ascription within or outside schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) as main outcome. Data were pooled using fixed- and random-effects meta-analysis models. Heterogeneity was assessed using stratified meta-analyses and meta-regression. Of 218 identified studies, 32 were included in the systematic review and 27 in the meta-analysis. Patients diagnosed with SSD scored higher on measures of SD than healthy controls (HC) (Hedges’ g = 1.8; 95% CI = 1.5 to 2.0), individuals diagnosed with other mental illness (OMI) (1.9; 1.6 to 2.2), bipolar or affective disorders (1.8; 1.4 to 2.2), and clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR) (1.6; 0.9 to 2.4). Patients with schizotypy or schizotypal personality disorder scored higher on measures of SD than OMI (1.5; 1.3 to 1.8) and HC (1.4; 1.1 to 1.7). Patients with first-episode psychosis scored higher on measures of SD than HC (2.5; 2.1 to 2.9) and OMI (1.6; 1.2 to 2.1). Subjects at CHR scored higher on measures of SD than HC (2.0; 1.7 to 2.2) and OMI (19; 1.6 to 2.2). Overall, heterogeneity ranged from negligible to high, especially in comparisons of the target group with OMI, probably as a reflection of the immanent diagnostic heterogeneity of this group. The findings suggest that SD selectively aggregate within schizophrenia spectrum disorders as compared to other mental disorders and that they could be a central phenotypic marker of vulnerability to schizophrenia across the different shades of severity of its spectrum of disorders.

Aim Aberrant salience (AS) is considered a putative predisposing factor for the onset of psychosis. However, despite several studies conducted in the general population, research in early psychosis is still relatively scarce. The main purposes of this study were to investigate any relevant correlation of AS with functioning and psychopathology in young patients with first episode psychosis (FEP), and to analyse the longitudinal stability of AS across a 1 year follow-up period. Methods All the participants (139 FEP), aged 13-35 years, completed the Aberrant Salience Inventory (ASI), the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS), and the Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). Spearman correlation analysis among psychopathological parameters were performed both at baseline and after the 1 year of follow-up. Results Across the follow-up, FEP patients showed a significant decrease in the ASI total score. This reduction was specifically associated with the number of individual cognitive-behavioural therapy sessions offered to FEP individuals in the same time period (and not with antipsychotic dose at baseline). Conclusions AS is clinically significant in FEP patients. However, it tends to ameliorate over time together with the delivery of specialized, person-tailored FEP treatments within a specific "Early Intervention in Psychosis" protocol.

Research on Clinical High-Risk for Psychosis (CHR-P) has led to a vigorous change in the field of early detection in psychiatry and is gradually expanding its focus toward early development. The Annual Research Review on psychosis risk in adolescents (Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 62, 2020 and 657) offers a wide-angle meta-analytical picture of such emerging trends in all areas relevant to CHR-P Research, that is, detection, prognosis, and intervention. This editorial perspective is meant to expand the clinical and conceptual reach of these meta-analytic findings in relation to (a) the influence of age on transition rate and scalability of the early detection model across the child-adolescent vs adult periods; (b) potential latent heterogeneity of the pathogenetic trajectories leading to CHR-P as suggested by comorbid psychopathologies; (c) controversial (or at least problematic) prognostic significance of antipsychotic exposure in CHR-P subjects, especially in children and adolescents.

According to the neurodevelopmental hypothesis of schizophrenia, the premorbid stages of nonaffective psychosis are characterized by early phenotypic manifestations of neurobiological vulnerability, whose developmental trends are accurately characterized for IQ, language, and motor abilities. More elusive is the developmental relationship between psychotic risk and executive functions. Few longitudinal studies are available on this relationship, suggesting a developmental lag for executive functions in subjects that will develop psychosis in young adulthood. In this brief commentary we underline specific developmental characteristics of psychotic manifestations that should be considered by further studies, which are aimed at grasping the developmental relationship between psychotic risk and neurocognitive features. Psychosis is an end-stage phenomenon that represents the long-term outcome of a prolonged psychopathological construction. By designing studies addressing developmentally-sensitive risk phenotypes for psychosis, it will be possible to understand how executive functions (among other neurocognitive features) might impact the risk of developing psychosis.