Search

BACKGROUND Psychotherapy noncompletion rates for veterans and their families are high. This study sought to (a) measure noncompletion rates of such patients at a university-based treatment center, (b) compare veteran and family member attrition rates, (c) identify dropout predictors, and (d) explore clinicians' perspectives on treatment noncompletion. METHOD Using quantitative and qualitative approaches, we analyzed demographic and clinical characteristics of 141 patients (90 military veterans; 51 family members) in a university treatment center. We defined dropout as not completing the time-limited therapy contract. Reviewing semistructured interview data assessing clinicians' perspectives on their patients' dropout, three independent raters agreed on key themes, with interrater coefficient kappa range .74 to 1. RESULTS Patient attrition was 24%, not differing significantly between veterans and family members. Diagnosis of major depression (MDD) and exposure-based therapies predicted noncompletion, as did higher baseline Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) total scores, severe depression (HDRS > 20), lack of Beck Depression Inventory weekly improvement, and history of military sexual trauma. Clinicians mostly attributed noncompletion to patient difficulties coping with intense emotions, especially in exposure-based therapies. CONCLUSION Noncompletion rate at this study appeared relatively low compared to other veteran-based treatment centers, if still unfortunately substantial. Patients with comorbid MDD/PTSD and exposure-based therapies carried greater noncompletion risk due to the MDD component, and this should be considered in treatment planning. Ongoing discussion of dissatisfaction and patient discontinuation, in the context of a strong therapeutic alliance, might reduce noncompletion in this at-risk population. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

The Military Family Wellness Center at Columbia University Irving Medical Center provides cost-free, confidential mental health services to military service members, veterans, and their families in a nongovernmental setting, with an emphasis on addressing gaps in available care. Partnerships with academic institutions and collaboration with veteran organizations, regional stakeholders, and local Veterans Administration centers facilitate cross-site referrals, enhance knowledge and expertise, and advance shared goals. This article describes the development of these relationships, focusing on key priorities, barriers overcome, and lessons learned. Future directions are discussed.

OBJECTIVE: Military service members and veterans have high rates of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), as do military family members. Exposure-based, cognitive-behavioral approaches have received ample research; other PTSD therapies require further empirical attention. Interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT), targeting affective awareness, life circumstances, and social support, has demonstrated efficacy for civilians with PTSD but awaits rigorous testing in military personnel: only two small military pilot studies and two case reports have been published. Military family members have received minimal clinical outcomes research. Addressing these gaps, this open trial is the first to examine IPT for PTSD in veterans, service members, and family members, including a subsample of patients with comorbid PTSD/depression. METHODS: Fifty U.S. military service members, veterans, and family members were offered 14 sessions of IPT for PTSD. Psychosis, bipolar disorder, moderate or greater substance use disorder, and high suicide risk were exclusion criteria. PTSD and depressive symptoms were assessed at baseline, mid-treatment, post-treatment, and three-month follow-up. RESULTS: Clinician-assessed PTSD (Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale) and depression (Hamilton Depression scale) symptoms decreased over time in the full sample and the comorbid PTSD/depression subset (ps