Search

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent an effective cancer immunotherapy yet are associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The aim of this study was to characterize irAEs involving the peripheral nervous system (PNS-irAEs) in a real-world cohort of ICI-treated patients. Methods Cancer patients treated with ICIs between January 2014 and March 2022 were included. Patients with PNS-irAEs were identified and divided into two groups: (1) cranial/peripheral neuropathies and (2) myasthenia gravis (MG) and/or myositis. Clinical characteristics and outcomes, measured with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), were compared among the two groups. Results Among 920 ICI-treated patients, 20 patients (2.17%) developed a PNS-irAEs. The median latency from ICI exposure was 8.8 weeks and the median time from onset to clinical nadir was 3.5 weeks. Eleven patients developed a neuropathy: polyneuropathy (n = 4), cranial neuropathy (n = 3), small-fiber neuropathy (n = 3), brachial plexopathy (n = 1). Nine patients presented MG and/or myositis: concomitant MG and myositis (n = 6), isolated myositis (n = 2), exacerbation of MG (n = 1). Immunosuppressive treatment and/or ICI withdrawal determined a significant clinical improvement, expressed by a mRS reduction, in the neuropathy group (p = 0.004), but not in the MG/myositis group (p = 0.11). Overall, death due to irAEs occurred in four patients (20%), all with MG/myositis. Compared to patients with neuropathies, those with MG/myositis had a shorter latency onset (p = 0.036), developed more frequently concomitant non-neurologic irAEs (p = 0.028) and showed a higher mortality rate (p = 0.026). Conclusions In our large cohort of ICI-treated patients, 2.17% developed PNS-irAEs. Compared to ir-neuropathies, ir-MG/myositis tend to occur earlier from ICI exposure and present a worse response to treatment and a higher mortality.

The combination of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy (CT) in first-line setting improved survival outcomes of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Among the various adverse events, renal toxicity can be a relevant safety issue.We conducted a single-center, observational retrospective study including consecutive patients treated with upfront CT-ICI for advanced nonsquamous NSCLC to investigate incidence and clinical characteristics of acute kidney injury (AKI) using 'Acute Kidney Injury Working Group of Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes' (KDIGO) definition.A total of 89 patients received a first-line CT/ICI. The median age was 69 years. 60.7 % were male, and 87.6 % had an ECOG PS of 0-1. 92.1 % had a baseline glomerular filtration rate of at least 60 ml/min. According to KDIGO criteria, 25 (28 %) patients developed AKI. Considering risk factors for AKI onset, patients receiving10 cycles of CT/ICI were more likely to experience AKI (p 0.001). No other associations were found with other variables, including concomitant medications. Any component of the treatment was discontinued (pemetrexed pembrolizumab or both) in 10 (40 %) patients, and 9 patients (36 %) were addressed to nephrological consultation. These patients had higher mean creatinine variation from baseline (1 vs 0.6 mg/dl, p = 0.025) and creatine level (1.8 vs 1.4 mg/dl, p = 0.015), but lower eGFR (35.7 vs 54.2 ml/min, p = 0.011) in comparison to patients not addressed. No patients had microscopic hematuria or pyuria, but mild proteinuria (0.8 g/24 h) was found in 4 patients. A renal biopsy was performed on 3 patients, revealing acute tubule interstitial nephritis (ATIN), karyomegalic interstitial nephritis, and acute tubular necrosis (ATN).Renal toxicity represents a challenging adverse event that could negatively impact outcomes of metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC patients receiving CT/ICI demanding a multidisciplinary approach.

Background Many patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) derive poor benefit from immunotherapy (IO). For some of them, adding chemotherapy (CT) can improve the outcomes, but the reliability of programmed death–ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression as the only biomarker to distinguish these patients is unsatisfactory. We sought to detect clinicopathological and molecular predictive factors of survival that might be added to PD-L1 expression in the selection of patients who should receive IO alone or chemoimmunotherapy (CIT). Methods We conducted a systematic search of randomized controlled clinical trials investigating IO, alone or with CT, vs CT alone in treatment-naïve advanced NSCLC patients. Meta-analyses and meta-regression analyses were performed to investigate IO alone vs CT, CIT vs CT, and IO alone vs CIT. Results A total of 14 367 patients with advanced NSCLC across 25 randomized controlled clinical trials were included. Squamous histology, male sex, current and former smoker status, PD-L1 expression of 50% or more, and high tumor mutational burden (TMB) correlated with improved survival with IO alone compared with CT. Conversely, female sex, no smoking history, negative PD-L1 expression, and low TMB correlated with unsatisfactory outcomes with IO alone vs CT but not with CIT vs CT. CIT improved survival vs IO alone in female patients, never smokers, those having a PD-L1 expression of 1% or more (but not with a PD-L1 of ≥ 50%) or a low TMB and in patients with central nervous system metastasis. Conclusions These findings suggest some clinicopathological and molecular features that, added to PD-L1 expression, could help in the selection of the most appropriate first-line IO-based treatment for advanced NSCLC patients.

Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy demonstrated a clear benefit in resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with nodal disease (stages II-III), and a minimal benefit in tumors >4 cm (stage II, TNM 8th edition). Pleural invasion (PL), classified as visceral pleural invasion (VPI, which includes PL1 and PL2, and parietal pleural invasion (PL3), is an established negative prognostic factor. However, whether PL should influence the decisional algorithm of postoperative chemotherapy is controversial. Methods: A survival analysis of NSCLC patients who underwent radical surgery between 2010 and 2015 included in the SEER database was performed. Tumor stage and size, number of examined and positive nodes, histology, PL, and treatment data were extracted. Propensity score matching was performed. The benefit of chemotherapy was analyzed in two subgroups: standard of care (SOC), including patients with positive nodes or tumors ≥ 4 cm; non-SOC, including patients with tumors < 4 cm and negative nodes. Results: Records of 30,858 patients were extracted. 11,708 patients were included in the propensity score-matched analysis. In the SOC subgroup, including 8089 patients, all pleural invasion degrees were associated with progressively increased risk for death and shorter overall survival (OS), independently from chemotherapy administration. However, chemotherapy significantly improved the median OS regardless of the extent of PL. In the non-SOC subgroup, including 3619 patients, only PL3 was associated with increased mortality. The administration of chemotherapy did not improve survival outcomes. Conclusion: Chemotherapy should be strongly recommended in patients in the SOC-subgroup with pleural invasion. VPI is not associated with unfavorable prognosis in the non-SOC subgroup.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), either alone or combined with chemotherapy, represent the cornerstone of the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without targetable gene alterations. Programmed death ligand-1 expression currently represents the only available biomarker to predict response to ICI, although its reliability is debated. However, most patients still do not derive benefit from immunotherapy, making the identification of further predictive biomarkers extremely needed. Serine/threonine kinase 11 (STK11)/liver kinase B1 (LKB1) and Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (KEAP1) mutations occur in 25–30% and 11–27% of advanced NSCLC, respectively. Several studies associated their presence with poor outcomes in patients treated with ICI. However, more recent evidence showed poor outcomes among NSCLC with STK11/LKB1 and/or KEAP1 mutations regardless of the treatment received. We reviewed the literature to provide a comprehensive, timely and structured overview of the role of STK11/LKB1 and KEAP1 mutations in NSCLC. Although conflicting outcomes have been reported by studies evaluating their impact in KRAS wild-type patients or regardless of KRAS mutation, the correlation between STK11/LKB1 and KEAP1 mutations and poor outcomes with ICI appears to be consistent in presence of concurrent KRAS mutations. The main limitations of most studies are represented by the inclusion of other gene mutations (e.g. TP53) together with STK11 and KEAP1 mutations as a group and by the lack of comparison arms including patients who received other treatments (e.g. chemotherapy). Studies evaluating the impact of STK11 and KEAP1 mutations on the outcomes with ICI and other therapies showed a similar effect regardless of the treatment received, suggesting a prognostic, rather than predictive, value.

Background: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are a promising source of biological information in cancer. Data correlating PD-L1 expression in CTCs with patients’ response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are still lacking. Methods: This is a prospective single-center cohort study enrolling patients with advanced NSCLC. CTCs were identified and counted with the CellSearch system. PD-L1 expression on CTCs was assessed with phycoerythrin-conjugated anti-human PD-L1 antibody, clone MIH3 (BioLegend, USA). Primary endpoint was the correlation between the CTCs PD-L1 expression and overall survival (OS). Among secondary objectives, we evaluated the correlation between PD-L1 expression on CTCs and matched tumor tissue and the correlation of CTC number and baseline tumor size (BTS). Results: Thirty-nine patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents as second- or third-line therapy were enrolled. Patients were divided into 3 groups: no CTC detectable (CTCnull, n = 15), PD-L1 positive CTC (CTCpos, n = 13), and PD-L1 negative CTC (CTCneg, n = 11). Median OS in patients with CTCneg was 2.2 months, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.8-3.6 (reference) versus 3.7 months, 95% CI, 0.1-7.5 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.33; 95% CI, 0.13-0.83; P = .019) in patients with CTCpos versus 16.0 months, 95% CI, 2.2-29.8 (HR 0.17; 95% CI, 0.06-0.45; P< .001) in patients with CTCnull. No correlation was found between PD-L1 expression on CTCs and on tumor tissue. CTC number was correlated with BTS. Conclusion: PD-L1 expression on CTCs is a promising biomarker in patients with NSCLC treated with ICIs. Further validation as predictive biomarker is needed.

In recent years, immunotherapy has significantly changed the treatment of locally advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Conversely, the role of immunotherapy in NSCLC with uncommon histologies remains unclear, while in other rare thoracic malignancies, such as malignant pleural mesothelioma and thymic epithelial tumors, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors is modifying therapeutic strategies with solid hopes for the future. However, larger prospective studies are urgently needed to define the best treatment strategies and the role of immunotherapy in these orphan tumors. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the emerging role of immunotherapy in the treatment of patients affected by these rare thoracic malignancies.

The advent of immunotherapy and targeted therapies has dramatically changed the outcomes of patients affected by many malignancies. Pancreatic cancer (PC) remains one the few tumors that is not treated with new generation therapies, as chemotherapy still represents the only effective therapeutic strategy in advanced-stage disease. Agents aiming to reactivate the host immune system against cancer cells, such as those targeting immune checkpoints, failed to demonstrate significant activity, despite the success of these treatments in other tumors. In many cases, the proportion of patients who derived benefits in early-phase trials was too small and unpredictable to justify larger studies. The population of PC patients with high microsatellite instability/mismatch repair deficiency is currently the only population that may benefit from immunotherapy; nevertheless, the prevalence of these alterations is too low to determine a real change in the treatment scenario of this tumor. The reasons for the unsuccess of immunotherapy may lie in the extremely peculiar tumor microenvironment, including distinctive immune composition and cross talk between different cells. These unique features may also explain why the biomarkers commonly used to predict immunotherapy efficacy in other tumors seem to be useless in PC. In the current paper, we provide a comprehensive and up-to-date review of immunotherapy in PC, from the analysis of the tumor immune microenvironment to immune biomarkers and treatment outcomes, with the aim to highlight that simply transferring the knowledge acquired on immunotherapy in other tumors might not be a successful strategy in patients affected by PC.

Constitutive KRAS signalling drives tumorigenesis across several cancer types. In non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) activating

In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), BRAF class 1 alterations are effectively targeted by BRAF inhibitors. Conversely, targeted therapies have very low or absent activity in patients carrying class 2 and 3 alterations. The spectrum of BRAF alterations in NSCLC patients, and their accompanying clinical features, genomic landscape and treatment outcomes have been poorly reported.We identified BRAF alterations of defined functional class across different tumors through a systematic review. Then, we selected NSCLC patients carrying BRAF alterations, according to the systematic review, in the cBioPortal (cBioPortal cohort) to collect and analyze clinical, biomolecular and survival data. Finally, we identified NSCLC patients carrying BRAF non-V600 mutations enrolled in POPLAR and OAK trials (POPLAR/OAK cohort), extracting clinical and survival data for survival analyses.100 different BRAF non-V600 alterations were identified through the systematic review. In the cBioPortal cohort (Different classes of BRAF alterations confer distinctive clinical features, biomolecular signature and disease behavior to NSCLC patients. Non-V600 alterations are characterized by poor prognosis, but key gene co-alterations involved in cancer cell survival and immune pathways may suggest their potential sensitivity to tailored treatments.

Background Improved outcome in tobacco smoking patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following immunotherapy has previously been reported. However, little is known regarding this association during first‐line immunotherapy in patients with high PD‐L1 expression. In this study we compared clinical outcomes according to the smoking status of two large multicenter cohorts. Methods We compared clinical outcomes according to the smoking status (never smokers vs. current/former smokers) of two retrospective multicenter cohorts of metastatic NSCLC patients, treated with first‐line pembrolizumab and platinum‐based chemotherapy. Results A total of 962 NSCLC patients with PD‐L1 expression ≥50% who received first‐line pembrolizumab and 462 NSCLC patients who received first‐line platinum‐based chemotherapy were included in the study. Never smokers were confirmed to have a significantly higher risk of disease progression (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.49 [95% CI: 1.15–1.92], p = 0.0022) and death (HR = 1.38 [95% CI: 1.02–1.87], p = 0.0348) within the pembrolizumab cohort. On the contrary, a nonsignificant trend towards a reduced risk of disease progression (HR = 0.74 [95% CI: 0.52–1.05], p = 0.1003) and death (HR = 0.67 [95% CI: 0.45–1.01], p = 0.0593) were reported for never smokers within the chemotherapy cohort. After a random case–control matching, 424 patients from both cohorts were paired. Within the matched pembrolizumab cohort, never smokers had a significantly shorter progression‐free survival (PFS) (HR = 1.68 [95% CI: 1.17–2.40], p = 0.0045) and a nonsignificant trend towards a shortened overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.32 [95% CI: 0.84–2.07], p = 0.2205). On the contrary, never smokers had a significantly longer PFS (HR = 0.68 [95% CI: 0.49–0.95], p = 0.0255) and OS (HR = 0.66 [95% CI: 0.45–0.97], p = 0,0356) compared to current/former smoker patients within the matched chemotherapy cohort. On pooled multivariable analysis, the interaction term between smoking status and treatment modality was concordantly statistically significant with respect to ORR (p = 0.0074), PFS (p = 0.0001) and OS (p = 0.0020), confirming the significantly different impact of smoking status across the two cohorts. Conclusions Among metastatic NSCLC patients with PD‐L1 expression ≥50% receiving first‐line pembrolizumab, current/former smokers experienced improved PFS and OS. On the contrary, worse outcomes were reported among current/former smokers receiving first‐line chemotherapy., Improved outcome in tobacco smoking NSCLC patients following treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has previously been reported. Little is known regarding this association during first‐line immunotherapy in patients with high PD‐L1 expression. Clinical outcomes according to the smoking status of two large multicenter cohorts were compared in this study. Smokers with high PD‐L1 expression ≥ 50% experienced improved progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with first‐line pembrolizumab. The opposite trend was found in NSCLC patients treated with first‐line platinum‐based chemotherapy.

Purpose The presence of bone metastasis at baseline has been associated with dismal prognosis under immunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria may be limited for bone-specific response evaluation. Whether their assessment through MD Anderson (MDA) criteria predict immunotherapy efficacy is unknown. Materials and methods We conducted a single-center retrospective study to assess the use of MDA criteria in evaluating bone metastasis in NSCLC treated with immunotherapy. Radiological imaging were reviewed to classify bone lesions as osteolytic, osteoblastic, or mixed. Bone response to treatment data was classified according to MDA criteria. Results 222 patients received single-agent immunotherapy. The presence of bone metastasis increased the risk of death both in the univariate (HR: 1.46, 95% CI, 1.05–2.03, p = 0.024) and in the multivariate model (HR: 1.61, 95% CI, 1.10–2.36, p = 0.015). According to MDA criteria, 57.3% of patients had progressive disease as best response, 29.5% stable disease, 11.4% partial response and 1.6% complete response. Bone-specific objective response was associated with a significantly increased median overall survival (11.3 vs. 3.1 months, p = 0.027) and longer median progression-free survival (6 vs. 2.1 months, p = 0.056). The median time to bone failure (TBF) was 2.4 months (IQR, 1.67–3.0). In 25.7% of cases, TBF was shorter than progression-free survival according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. TBF was positively correlated with overall survival (HR = 0.73, p = 0.00019). Conclusions MDA criteria represent a reliable tool in assessing bone-specific response, offering a more accurate evaluation with the aim to earlier predict survival outcomes or treatment failure compared to RECIST criteria for advanced NSCLC patients receiving immunotherapy.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene fusions represent an extremely rare aberration, occurring in approximately 0.05–0.13% non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. RAD51 is the most frequently involved partner gene in EGFR fusions, but other fusion partner genes have been described. To date, a considerable number of next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels still cannot detect these alterations due to the position of the breakpoint site, mainly involving intron 24 of EGFR. Current evidences show that such gene alteration is more likely to occur in lung adenocarcinomas of young, female, non-smoker patients. Also, brain metastases are frequently reported in these patients. Only very few cases in literature described clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients harboring EGFR gene fusions, reporting responses to 1st generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Herein, we report the case of two young non-smoker females with metastatic NSCLC harboring EGFR-RAD51 gene fusion, detected by FoundationOne DX1 assay, who responded to EGFR TKIs. The first patient initially received erlotinib, then switched to osimertinib for renal toxicity, while the second was treated with gefitinib. This is, to our knowledge, the first report describing response to the 3rd EGFR TKI osimertinib. Our experience highlights the need of a broader molecular profiling in young or never smoker NSCLC patients without detectable molecular aberration using standard NGS panels. Finally, further studies to assess the real prevalence of EGFR gene fusions and their spectrum of sensitivity to different EGFR TKIs are needed.

Data on spectrum and grade of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in long-term responders to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are lacking.We performed a retrospective multicenter study to characterized irAEs occurring after a 12-months minimum treatment period with PD-(L)1 ICIs in advanced cancer patients. IrAEs were categorized into “early” (≤12 months) and “late” (>12 months).From September 2013 to October 2019, 436 consecutive patients were evaluated. 223 experienced any grade early-irAEs (51.1%), while 132 experienced any grade late-irAEs (30.3%) (p < 0.0001). Among the latter, 29 (22%) experienced a recurrence of an early-irAEs, while 103 (78%) experienced de novo late-irAEs involving different system/organ. Among patients with late-irAEs, 21 experienced G3/G4 irAEs (4.8%). Median time to onset of early-irAEs was 3.4 months (95%CI: 2.8-4.2), while the median time to onset of late-irAEs was 16.6 months (95%CI: 15.8-17.6). Cumulative time-adjusted risk of disease progression according to both the early-irAEs (HR = 0.63 [95%CI: 0.30-1.29], p = 0.204) and late-irAEs occurrence revealed no statistically significant differences (HR = 0.75 [95%CI: 0.37-1.56], p = 0.452). Also the time-adjusted cumulative risk of death according to both early-irAEs (HR = 0.79 [95%CI: 0.34-1.86], p = 0.598) and late-irAEs (HR = 0.92 [95%CI: 0.49-1.74], p = 0.811) did not show statistically significant differences.Although less frequent than early-irAEs, late-irAEs are quite common in long responders to PD-(L)1 ICIs, and are different in terms of spectrum and grade. Time-adjusted analysis revealed that the cumulative risk of disease progression and death were not significantly reduced in patients who experienced late-irAEs.

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The second sentence of the section "irAEs and ICI efficacy" should read as.

Several studies have found an association between higher body mass index (BMI) and improved clinical outcomes in cancer patients receiving programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) checkpoint inhibitors. In a previous study, we found that overweight/obese patients were significantly more likely to experience any grade immune-related adverse events (irAEs) compared to non-overweight patients.We conducted a 'real-life', multi centre, retrospective observational study aimed at comparing the incidence of irAEs among cancer patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors according to baseline BMI.One thousand and seventy advanced cancer patients were evaluated. The median age was 68 years (range: 21-92), male/female ratio was 724/346. Primary tumours were: non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) (653 patients), melanoma (233 patients), renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (152 patients) and others (29 patients). Median BMI was 25 (13.6-46.6); according to World Health Organisation (WHO) classification, 44 patients (4.1%) were defined as underweight, 480 patients (44.9%) as having a normal weight, 416 patients (38.9%) as overweight and 130 patients (12.1%) as obese. Higher BMI was significantly related to higher occurrence of any grade immune-related adverse events [irAEs] (p 0.0001), G3/G4 irAEs (p 0.0001) and irAEs leading to discontinuation (LTD) (p 0.0001). Overweight and obesity were confirmed predictors for irAEs of any grade at both univariate and multivariate analysis. The adjusted odds ratios (ORs) (compared to normal-weight) were 10.6; 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 7.5-14.9 for overweight, and 16.6 (95%CI: 10.3-26.7) for obese patients. Obesity was the only factor significantly related to a higher incidence of G3/G4 irAEs (OR = 11.9 [95%CI: 6.4-22.3], p 0.0001) and LTD irAEs (OR = 8.8 [95%CI: 4.3-18.2], p 0.0001). Overweight and obese patients experienced a significantly higher occurrence of cutaneous, endocrine, gastro-intestinal (GI), hepatic and 'others' irAEs, compared to normal-weight patients. Only obese patients experienced a significantly higher occurrence of pulmonary and rheumatic irAEs, compared to normal-weight patients.Considering the previously evidenced association between higher BMI and better outcome, the current finding about the relationship between BMI and irAEs occurrence can contribute to consideration of these findings as the upside of the downside, which underlies an 'immunogenic phenotype'.

Background The development of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has improved the survival outcomes of patients with advanced ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The adverse events (AEs) related to ALK inhibitors are fairly well known; notably, about 20% of patients receiving lorlatinib experienced cognitive effects and behavioral alterations in pivotal trials. Therefore, psychiatric disorders could represent AEs of special interest for all ALK TKIs, deserving careful assessment in the post-marketing setting. Objective We conducted a real-world pharmacovigilance study on psychiatric AEs with marketed ALK inhibitors in subjects with advanced NSCLC. Patients and methods We performed an observational, retrospective analysis of spontaneous reports submitted to the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS, as of December 2020), selecting psychiatric AEs to ALK TKIs approved in NSCLC (crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib, lorlatinib). These AEs were independently scrutinized by three oncologists applying predefined exclusion criteria, described in terms of clinical/demographic features and assessed for drug-related causality according to an adaptation of the WHO–UMC system, a standardized probabilistic algorithm. Results Among 584 reported psychiatric AEs, 95 cases were selected as potentially treatment related, with higher reporting frequency for lorlatinib (26, 2.8%), followed by brigatinib (10, 1.2%), alectinib (18, 0.7%), ceritinib (12, 0.6%), and crizotinib (29, 0.3%). Reported psychiatric symptoms were mood disorders (39), psychotic disorders (24), and anxiety, agitation, and irritability (25). In the majority (74%) of cases, psychiatric AEs were serious and required hospitalization in about 32% of patients; 15.8% of retained cases were considered as highly probable and 69.5% as probable. Drug discontinuation was recorded in 31.6% of the reported cases, with the highest proportion for lorlatinib (65.4%). Conclusion Notwithstanding limitations, our study found a higher proportion of psychiatric AEs with lorlatinib, but also raised the hypothesis of psychiatric reactions as a class effect of ALK TKIs. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11523-021-00865-8.

In the last decade, the management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has radically changed. The standard chemotherapy treatment based on histology constituted for 25 years the cornerstone of anticancer treatment, but was finally put aside when molecular diagnosis and precision medicine have modified the therapeutic algorithm.

INTRODUCTION The treatment algorithm of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has evolved since the introduction of immunotherapy. The IMbrave150 trial set atezolizumab-bevacizumab as a new standard-of-care first-line treatment for unresectable HCC patients. However, for patients with intermediate or advanced stage with portal vein thrombosis but without distant metastases, 90Yttrium transarterial radioembolization (90Y-TARE) is considered the treatment of choice. AREAS COVERED We discuss the main evidence regarding the use of 90Y-TARE in HCC, the recent progress of immunotherapy in this tumor, and the preclinical rationale of combining VEGF blockade with the other two treatment strategies. EXPERT OPINION HCC has an extremely heterogeneous tumor immune microenvironment. This may explain the inconsistent outcomes obtained with immune-checkpoint inhibitors. The identification of patients who could benefit most from immunotherapy is crucial; however, reliable markers of response are lacking. Radiation therapy and VEGF inhibition have an established synergism with immunotherapy, mainly linked to enhanced antigen presentation and reduced immunosuppressive immune infiltrate. Combining an immune-checkpoint inhibitor with VEGF blockade and 90Y-TARE might hence overcome primary resistances observed when each of these treatments is administerd alone.

Background: An acceptable risk-benefit ratio may encourage the prescription of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) near the late stage of life. The lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) was validated in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with ICIs. The palliative prognostic (PaP) score without clinical prediction of survival (PaPwCPS) predicts early mortality probability in terminal cancer patients. Methods: We performed a retrospective study including 182 deceased advanced NSCLC patients, treated with single-agent ICI at our Institution. Two prognostic categories of high and low mortality risk were identified through ROC curve analysis for PaPwCPS and LIPI scores. Results: Most were >65 years of age (68.3%) and received second-line ICI (61.2%). A total of 29 (15.9%) and 131 (72.0%) patients died within 30 and 90 days from treatment start, respectively. A total of 81 patients (44.5%) received ICI during the last month of life. Baseline PaPwCPS and LIPI scores were assessable for 78 patients. The AUC of ROC curves was significantly increased for PaPwCPS as compared with LIPI score for both 30-day and 90-day mortality. A high PaPwCPS score was associated in multivariate analysis with increased 30-day (HR 2.69, p = 0.037) and 90-day (HR 4.01, p < 0.001) mortality risk. A high LIPI score was associated with increased 90-day mortality risk (p < 0.001). Conclusion: We found a tendency towards ICI prescription near the late stage of life. The PaPwCPS score was a reliable predictor of 30- and 90-day mortality.

Purpose of Review In this review, we analyzed the current landscape of non-PD-(L)1 targeting immunotherapy. Recent Findings The advent of immunotherapy has completely changed the standard approach toward advanced NSCLC. Inhibitors of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis have quickly taken place as first-line treatment for NSCLC patients without targetable “driver” mutations. However, a non-negligible portion of patients derive modest benefit from immune-checkpoint inhibitors, and valid second-line alternatives are lacking, pushing researchers to analyze other molecules and pathways as potentially viable targets in the struggle against NSCLC. Summary Starting from the better characterized CTLA-4 inhibitors, we then critically collected the actual knowledge on NSCLC vaccines as well as on other emerging molecules, many of them in their early phase of testing, to provide to the reader a comprehensive overview of the state of the art of immunotherapy in NSCLC beyond PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.

PURPOSE Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy often is suspended because of immune-mediated diarrhea and colitis (IMDC). We examined the rate of and risk factors for IMDC recurrence after ICI resumption. METHODS This retrospective multicenter study examined patients who resumed ICI therapy after improvement of IMDC between January 2010 and November 2018. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses assessed the association of clinical covariates and IMDC recurrence. RESULTS Of the 167 patients in our analysis, 32 resumed an anti–cytotoxic T-cell lymphocyte-4 (CTLA-4) agent, and 135 an anti–programmed cell death 1 or ligand 1 (PD-1/L1) agent. The median age was 60 years (interquartile range [IQR], 50-69 years). The median duration from IMDC to restart of ICI treatment was 49 days (IQR, 23-136 days). IMDC recurred in 57 patients (34%) overall (44% of those receiving an anti–CTLA-4 and 32% of those receiving an anti–PD-1/L1); 47 of these patients (82%) required immunosuppressive therapy for recurrent IMDC, and all required permanent discontinuation of ICI therapy. The median duration from ICI resumption to IMDC recurrence was 53 days (IQR, 22-138 days). On multivariable logistic regression, patients who received anti–PD-1/L1 therapy at initial IMDC had a higher risk of IMDC recurrence (odds ratio [OR], 3.45; 95% CI, 1.59 to 7.69; P = .002). Risk of IMDC recurrence was higher for patients who required immunosuppression for initial IMDC (OR, 3.22; 95% CI, 1.08 to 9.62; P = .019) or had a longer duration of IMDC symptoms in the initial episode (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.03; P = .031). Risk of IMDC recurrence was lower after resumption of anti–PD-1/L1 therapy than after resumption of anti–CTLA-4 therapy (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.81; P = .019). CONCLUSION One third of patients who resumed ICI treatment after IMDC experienced recurrent IMDC. Recurrence of IMDC was less frequent after resumption of anti–PD-1/L1 than after resumption of anti–CTLA-4.

na

Background: Baseline steroids before ICI have been associated with poor outcomes, particularly when introduced due to cancer symptoms. Methods: Retrospective analysis of advanced NSCLC patients treated with ICI. We collected the use of intercurrent steroids (&ge, 10 mg of prednisone-equivalent) within the first eight weeks of ICI. We correlated steroid use with patient outcomes according to the indications. Results: 413 patients received ICI, 299 were steroids-na&iuml, ve at baseline. A total of 49 patients received intercurrent steroids (16%), of whom 38 for cancer-related symptoms and 11 for other indications, such as immune-related events. Overall, median (m) progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.9 months (mo.) [95% CI, 1.8-2.4] and overall survival (OS) 10 mo. [95% CI, 8.1&ndash, 12.9]. Intercurrent steroids under ICI correlated with a shorter PFS/OS (1.3 and 2.3 mo. respectively, both p &lt, 0.0001). Intercurrent steroids for cancer-related symptoms correlated with poorest mPFS [1.1 mo., 95% CI, 0.9&ndash, 1.5] and mOS [1.9 mo., 95%CI, 1.5&ndash, 2.4, p &lt, 0.0001)]. No mOS and mPFS differences were found between cancer-unrelated-steroid group and no-steroid group. Steroid use for cancer-related symptoms was an independent prognostic factor for poor PFS [HR 2.64, 95% CI, 1.2&ndash, 5.6] and OS [HR 4.53, 95% CI, 1.8&ndash, 11.1], both p &lt, 0.0001. Conclusion: Intercurrent steroids during ICI had no detrimental prognostic impact if the indication was unrelated to cancer symptoms.

Immune checkpoint inhibition completely changed our approach of cancer therapeutics and led to interesting response rate in a wide spectrum of tumors. However, only a portion of patients benefits from immune checkpoint blockers. To improve response rates, monoclonal antibodies targeting costimulatory receptors called PD-1 or CTLA‐4 are combined together or with different therapies such as chemotherapy or antiangiogenic drugs. Some of these combinations are already approved and used in daily practice, but the safety and efficacy in particular populations such as older patients, Eastern Cooperative Organization performance status 2 or patients taking corticosteroids or antibiotics remain unclear. This special report focuses on the data available for these populations with a focus on non-small-cell lung cancer.

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The second sentence of the section "irAEs and ICI efficacy" should read as.

Objectives Molecular diagnosis determines therapeutic strategies for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer – adenocarcinoma (NSCLC-A) but depends on resources availability. We compared a sequential single-gene testing algorithm to next generation sequencing in NSCLC-A to assess differences in terms of effectiveness, costs, tissue consumption and time. Materials and methods We analyzed a retrospective cohort of advanced NSCLC-A patients treated at the Sant'Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital. The sequential testing includes a first analysis of EGFR and KRAS status with further molecular testing physician driven. The available NGS panel detects 35 hotspot mutations,19 amplifications and 23 rearrangements. Results We included 1758 patients; 1221 characterized with the sequential algorithm between January 2014 to February 2019 and 537 with Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) until January 2020. The prevalence of EGFR, ALK and KRAS alterations was similar between the stepwise and NGS group (16.5% vs 14.3%, 6.3% vs 6.3% and 36% vs 33.5%, respectively). Differently, ROS-1 rearrangements prevalence was higher in stepwise respect to NGS group (4.7% vs 0.7%). Similarly, the stepwise group presented higher prevalence than NGS for MET amplification (11.2% vs 2.2%), MET mutations (9.0% vs 2.4%), HER2 amplification (3.3% vs 1.9%) and mutations (9.8% vs 3.0%), and BRAF mutations (4.5% vs 5.6%). Among the NGS group other mutations were found in 141 patients (26.3%) and the presence of concurrent mutations in 131 (24.4%). The stepwise algorithm presented a relevant dropout rate that increased at each step, with 11.4%, 16.4% and 49.3% respectively for ALK, ROS1 and other analysis. Sequential testing’s expenditure was 1375 € per patient, vs 770 € for NGS. Moreover, NGS testing can be performed with just a 25 μm slide respect to an estimated 33.3 μm slide for sequential strategy. Conclusion NGS offered a less expensive and more reliable model of diagnosis respect to sequential one for patients affected by NSCLC-A.

The identification of epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR) mutations represented a fundamental step forward in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as they define a subset of patients who benefit from the administration of specifically designed targeted therapies. The inhibition of mutant EGFR through EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), either reversible, first-generation gefitinib and erlotinib, or irreversible, second-generation afatinib, has dramatically improved the prognosis of patients harboring this specific genetic alteration, leading to unexpected clinical benefit. Unfortunately, virtually all patients who initially respond to treatment develop acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs within 9–14 months. The EGFR T790M secondary mutation has emerged as a cause of treatment failure in approximately 60% of resistant cases. To date, several compounds designed with the aim to overcome T790M-mediated resistance are under clinical investigation. The aim of this review is to discuss emerging data regarding the third-generation EGFR-TKI, osimertinib, for the treatment of EGFR T790M mutant advanced NSCLC.

High-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas (HGNECs) of the lung represent a heterogeneous group of poorly differentiated neoplasms and include large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC). The development of brain metastases (BMs) occurs in roughly 20% of patients at diagnosis and represents a major issue in the management of HGNECs. The aim of this review is to briefly summarize current knowledge on the therapeutic options to treat lung HGNECs-derived BMs touching upon the unsolved issues of current treatment approaches and the future perspectives in the management of CNS-metastatic HGNECs of the lung. We searched MEDLINE and OVID databases for articles in English published from January 1980 to September 2016. SCLCs and LCNECs share clinical characteristics and biological behavior, as well as major genetic alterations. Consistently, SCLC-like chemotherapy appears to be more effective in LCNECs as compared to NSCLC-like regimens. However, the role of transthoracic radiotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is much less studied in LCNECs. Available data might suggest to approach LCNECs patients in a similar way to SCLCs also when it comes to thoracic radiotherapy and PCI. The development of brain metastasis is associated with poor prognosis and shortened survival in patients with HGNECs. Conventional cytotoxic agents display limited efficacy against HGNECs-derived brain metastasis. Patient with limited or extensive SCLC who respond to chemotherapy benefits from PCI. In LCNECs, the use of PCI is not well defined and might potentially improve the outcome of these patients. Prospective clinical trials addressing this issue are urgently needed.