Search

RESUMOIntroduçãoA revascularização miocárdica anatômica completa está associada a um melhor controle dos sintomas anginosos e a menores índices de eventos cardíacos maiores tardios. No entanto, em substancial número de pacientes tratados por meio de intervenção coronária percutânea (ICP), não logramos sua obtenção. Assim, nosso objetivo foi avaliar os fatores associados à revascularização miocárdica incompleta (RMI) em casos de ICP multiarterial.MétodosEstudo de coorte envolvendo 1.049 pacientes revascularizados de forma prospectiva e consecutiva por meio de ICP com tratamento de dois ou mais vasos, entre 2012 e 2014, divididos em dois grupos: RMI (n=324; 30,9%) e revascularização miocárdica completa (n=725; 69,1%).ResultadosA RMI foi significativamente associada a faixa etária maior (66,5 anos vs. 64,1 anos; p=0,003), hipertensão arterial (92,2% vs. 86,0%; p=0,006), insuficiência renal crônica (36.4% vs. 26.0%; p < 0,001), síndrome coronariana aguda (26,3% vs. 21,0%; p=0,05), revascularização cirúrgica prévia (16,1% vs. 7,1%; p=0,001), lesões em enxertos venosos (3,4% vs. 1,0%; p < 0,001) e oclusões crônicas (3,3% vs. 1,4%; p=0,005), bem como a menor acesso a stents farmacológicos (57,8% vs. 64,8%; p=0,002). Os resultados clínicos hospitalares não diferiram entre os grupos.ConclusõesA RMI ocorreu em cerca de um terço dos casos tratados, tendo sido observada associação significativa, com um perfil clínico de maior risco e com intervenções em lesões alvo comumente associadas com menor sucesso do procedimento. O grau de revascularização não gerou impacto nos resultados clínicos da fase hospitalar.ABSTRACTBackgroundComplete anatomical myocardial revascularization is associated with better angina control and lower rates of cardiac events. However, in a significant number of patients treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), complete revascularization is not achieved. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate factors associated with incomplete myocardial revascularization (IMR) in multivessel PCI patients.MethodsThis was a cohort study involving 1,049 prospectively and consecutively revascularized patients through PCI with treatment of two or more vessels, between 2012 and 2014, divided into two groups: IMR (n=324; 30.9%) and complete myocardial revascularization (n=725; 69.1%).ResultsIMR was significantly associated with older age (66.5 years vs. 64.1 years; p=0.003), arterial hypertension (92.2% vs. 86.0%; p=0.006), chronic renal failure (36.4% vs. 26.0%; p < 0.001), acute coronary syndrome (26.3% vs. 21.0%; p=0.05), previous surgical revascularization (16.1% vs. 7.1%; p=0.001), saphenous venous graft lesions (3.4% vs. 1.0%, p < 0.001), and chronic occlusions (3.3% vs. 1.4%, p=0.005), as well as lower access to drug‐eluting stents (57.8% vs. 64.8%; p=0.002). In‐hospital clinical outcomes did not differ between the groups.ConclusionsIMR occurred in approximately one‐third of treated cases, and a significant association was observed with a higher‐risk clinical profile and with target lesion interventions commonly associated with lower procedure success. The degree of revascularization had no impact on in‐hospital clinical outcomes.

BackgroundComplete anatomical myocardial revascularization is associated with better angina control and lower rates of cardiac events. However, in a significant number of patients treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), complete revascularization is not achieved. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate factors associated with incomplete myocardial revascularization (IMR) in multivessel PCI patients.MethodsThis was a cohort study involving 1,049 prospectively and consecutively revascularized patients through PCI with treatment of two or more vessels, between 2012 and 2014, divided into two groups: IMR (n = 324; 30.9%) and complete myocardial revascularization (n = 725; 69.1%).ResultsIMR was significantly associated with older age (66.5 years vs. 64.1 years; p = 0.003), arterial hypertension (92.2% vs. 86.0%; p = 0.006), chronic renal failure (36.4% vs. 26.0%; p < 0.001), acute coronary syndrome (26.3% vs. 21.0%; p = 0.05), previous surgical revascularization (16.1% vs. 7.1%; p = 0.001), saphenous venous graft lesions (3.4% vs. 1.0%, p < 0.001), and chronic occlusions (3.3% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.005), as well as lower access to drug-eluting stents (57.8% vs. 64.8%; p = 0.002). In-hospital clinical outcomes did not differ between the groups.ConclusionsIMR occurred in approximately one-third of treated cases, and a significant association was observed with a higher-risk clinical profile and with target lesion interventions commonly associated with lower procedure success. The degree of revascularization had no impact on in-hospital clinical outcomes.

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a segurança e eficácia da estratégia de tratamento cirúrgico ou conservador em pacientes com de lesões duvidosas de tronco da coronária esquerda (TCE), baseada nos achados do ultra-som intracoronariano (USIC). MÉTODOS: Incluídos 66 pacientes consecutivos com lesões angiograficamente duvidosas no TCE submetidos a avaliação ao USIC. Foram divididos em dois grupos de acordo com os achados do USIC. Grupo I, mantidos em tratamento clínico [área mínima da luz (AML) > 6,0 mm² e/ou diâmetro mínimo da luz (DML) > 2,5 mm] e Grupo II, encaminhados a revascularização (AML < 6,0 mm² e/ou DML < 2,5 mm). Avaliou-se a ocorrência de eventos cardíacos maiores (óbito, infarto agudo do miocárdio e/ou revascularização da lesão alvo) durante a evolução. RESULTADOS: Quarenta e um (62%) pacientes foram alocados no Grupo I e 25 (38%) no Grupo II. A média de seguimento foi de 42,1 meses. A angiografia coronariana não conseguiu diferenciar os dois grupos pela gravidade da lesão (DML 1,98 mm Grupo I versus 1,72 mm Grupo II, p = 0,75) ao contrário do USIC (DML 3,41 mm Grupo I versus 2,01 mm Grupo II, p < 0,001). Não houve óbito ou infarto do miocárdio no Grupo I. A sobrevida livre de eventos cardíacos maiores foi de 95% no grupo I versus 87,5% no Grupo II (p=ns). CONCLUSÃO: A estratégia de decisão de tratamento de pacientes com lesões angiograficamente duvidosas no TCE, guiada pelos achado do USIC, mostrou-se segura e eficaz.

This pilot study evaluated the safety and efficacy of an intensified oral sirolimus regimen (15-mg loading dose 24 hr before PCI, followed by a daily dose of 5 mg for 4 weeks) in 15 patients subjected to elective bare metal coronary stent implantation for de novo lesions. Mean patient age was 59 ± 9; 73% were male, and 13% were diabetic patients. The reference diameter was 3.04 ± 0.38 mm, and the lesion length was 14 ± 2 mm. Angiographic and volumetric intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) analyses were performed in all patients at 6.0 ± 0.2 months. Two patients (13%) met the definition of in-segment binary restenosis; in-stent and in-segment angiographic late loss was 0.61 ± 0.31 mm and 0.67 ± 0.45 mm, respectively, and the percent neointimal volume was 28.5 ± 15.8%. At adjacent reference segments, there was neither significant plaque increase nor constrictive vascular remodeling. At 24-month follow-up no deaths, myocardial infarctions, or target lesion revascularizations were detected. Mean sirolimus blood level was 13 ± 7 ng/ml. No correlations were found between drug levels and late loss (r = 0.15, P = 0.59) or IVUS percent neointimal volume (r = 0.23, P = 0.47). Side effects were frequent (80%), leading to dose reductions in four and drug discontinuation in one patient. The results of this pilot study suggest that an intensified 5-mg oral sirolimus regimen resulted in no relevant improvements in the angiographic and IVUS parameters of restenosis after stent implantation in de novo lesions when compared with historic controls. Considering the efficacy/safety balance, our results do not encourage further trials evaluating the current protocol for the prevention of in-stent restenosis. © 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

OBJECTIVE - This study compared the early and late results of the use of one single stent with those of the use of multiple stents in patients with lesions longer than 20mm. METHODS - Prospective assessment of patients electively treated with stents, with optimal stent deployment and followed-up for more than 3 months. From February '94 to January '98, 215 patients with lesions >20mm were treated. These patients were divided into 2 groups as follows: Group A - 105 patients (49%) with one stent implanted; Group B - 110 patients (51%) with multiple stents implanted. RESULTS - The mean length of the lesions was 26mm in group A (21-48mm) versus 29mm in group B (21-52mm) (p=0.01). Major complications occurred in one patient (0.9%) in group A (subacute thrombosis, myocardial infarctionand death) and in 2 patients (1.8%) in group B (one emergency surgery and one myocardial infarction) (p=NS). The results of the late follow-up period (>6 months) were similar for both groups (group A = 82% vs group B = 76%; p=NS), and we observed an event-free survical in 89% of the patients in group A and in 91% of the patients in group B (p=NS). Angina (group A = 11% vs group B = 7%) and lesion revascularization (group A = 5% vs group B = 6%; p=NS) also occurred in a similar percentage. No infarction or death was observed in the late follow-up period; restenosis was identified in 33% and 29% of the patients in groups A and B, respectively (p=NS). CONCLUSION - The results obtained using one stent and using multiple stents were similar; the greater cost-effectiveness of one stent implantation, however, seems to make this strategy the first choice.