Search

Drug eluting stents with biodegradable polymer have been developed to address the risk of very late adverse events. COMPARE II is one of the largest randomized studies comparing the biodegradable polymer-coated biolimus-eluting stent (BES; Nobori®) with second-generation durable polymer-coated

Background: Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) causes a substantial burden for health care systems. Data to rationally define the need for hospitalization or the appropriate length of stay (LOS) is limited. Our aim was to personalize length of stay in patients admitted to hospital for acute decompensated heart failure. Methods: Consecutive patients with ADHF presenting to our emergency department were prospectively followed. We daily conducted a multidisciplinary risk assessment and compared proposed with actually observed triage decisions. Results: At presentation, all patients required hospitalization. Median LOS was 11 days including 1 day after reaching medical stability. In 42.7% of patients, hospitalization was prolonged after medical stability mainly for nursing and organizational reasons. Within 30 days of enrollment, 7 (9.3%) patients were rehospitalized, 3 of them for persisting or relapsing heart failure. Conclusions: There appears to be potential to shorten inhospital stay in patients with ADHF mainly by providing post discharge ambulatory nursing care in order to improve resource utilization and to diminish “hospitalization-associated disability”. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/jocmr1154w

To determine the benefit of atrial contribution on work capacity in relation to left ventricular ejection fraction, we studied 17 patients (68 +/- 13 years) with dual chamber pacemakers (DDD) implanted for high degree atrioventricular (AV) block. In random order they were assigned to rate responsive ventricular (VVIR) and to atrial triggered ventricular (VDD) stimulation. Maximum oxygen uptake (max VO2), that correlates best with work capacity, was measured by spiroergometry at a respiratory quotient of 1.1 during treadmill exercise test. Left ventricular ejection fraction at rest was determined by radionuclide ventriculography during VDD-stimulation and an AV delay of 150 ms. There were no differences between these two pacing modes relating heart rate, blood pressure, minute ventilation, exercise duration and maximal work load. In eight patients with an ejection fraction50% (60 +/- 10%), but not in nine patients with an ejection fraction50% (41 +/- 10%), maximum oxygen uptake was significantly higher (P0.01) during atrial triggered ventricular pacing (1440 +/- 533 ml/min) compared with rate responsive ventricular pacing (1328 +/- 536 ml/min). Thus, rate responsive single chamber pacemakers largely enable the same work capacity as dual chamber pacemakers in patients with high degree AV block. Patients with normal left ventricular function may profit most from preserved AV synchrony as shown by the higher maximum oxygen uptake on exercise.

Despite higher costs, expenditure, and the necessity of repeatedly reprogramming of dual chamber pacemakers, they are increasingly implanted to achieve an optimal work capacity. The influence of an individually programmed atrioventricular (AV) delay between 100-250 msec on physical work capacity in 12 patients (68 +/- 16 years) with dual chamber pacemakers implanted for high degree AV block was studied. During radionuclide ventriculography at rest the "optimal AV delay" with the maximal achieved left ventricular ejection fraction and the "most unfavorable AV delay" with the least achieved ejection fraction were determined. The ejection fraction at rest with the "optimal AV delay" was 51 +/- 14% and with the "most unfavorable AV delay" 45 +/- 15% (P < 0.001). In random order each patient was assigned to either AV delay and a spiroergometry was performed to determine maximum oxygen uptake (max VO2), which correlates best with work capacity, at a respiratory quotient of 1.1. The results show neither a difference in maximum oxygen uptake (1,262 +/- 446 mL/min with the optimal AV delay, 1,248 +/- 400 mL/min with the most unfavorable AV delay, respectively) nor in heart rate, blood pressure, exercise duration, maximal workload, and minute ventilation. Thus, an individually programmed AV delay affects left ventricular ejection fraction at rest. In contrast, an individually programmed AV delay has no influence on physical work capacity in patients with a dual chamber pacemaker.