Search

Purpose: Spinal stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has become the standard of care in management of patients with limited sites of metastatic disease, radioresistant histologies, painful vertebral metastases with long life expectancy and cases of reirradiation. Our case-based guidelines aim to assist radiation oncologists in the appropriate utilization of SBRT for common, yet challenging, cases of spinal metastases., Methods and Materials: Cases were selected to include scenarios of large volume sacral disease with nerve entrapment, medically inoperable disease abutting the thecal sac, and local failure after prior SBRT. Relevant literature was reviewed, and areas requiring further investigation were discussed to offer a framework for evidence-based clinical practice., Results: Spinal SBRT can be effectively delivered in challenging cases following multidisciplinary discussion by using a methodical approach to patient selection, appropriate dose selection, and adherence to evidence-based dose constraints., Conclusions: The Radiosurgery Society's case-based practice review offers guidance to practicing physicians treating technically challenging SBRT candidate patients with spinal metastases., Competing Interests: Disclosures Anubhav G. Amin reports receiving consulting fees and payment for lectures from Globus. Samuel Chao reports payment for travel, honoraria, and research support from Blue Earth Diagnostics; and honoraria from GE Healthcare and Varian Medical Systems. Matthew Foote reports research grant from Elekta; consulting fees and honoraria from Varian and Elekta; and leadership role with Stereotactic Interest Group of Australasia. Matthias Guckenberger reports grants from ViewRay, Siemens Healthineers, and Astra Zeneca; consulting fees and honoraria from Astra Zeneca; and leadership role with ESTRO. Daniel Koffler reports internal departmental support for attending meetings; patent for Chimeric Immunomagnetic Nanosensors for cancer stem cell imaging; and leadership role in ESTRO workshop group in spatially fractionated RT. Simon Lo reports grant funding from Kuni Foundation, Hutchinson Center, and Elekta; has travel support from the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology (JASTRO); and serves as member of the Board of Directors and National Medical Director of the Distinction in Practice in Stereotatic Radiotherapy Program for the Radiosurgery Society and Alternate Councilor for the American College of Radiology. Kristin J. Redmond reported receiving research support from Accuray, Canon, and Icotec; participating on a data and safety monitoring board for BioMimetix; has travel support from Icotec and Brainlab; honorarium from Accuray; and patent pending with Canon. Daniel Lubelski reports consulting fees from Carbofix, Mindset Medical, and Dillon Technologies. Arjun Sahgal has received research grants from Elekta AB, Varian, Seagen, and Brainlab; is an advisor/consultant with Varian, Elekta (Gamma Knife Icon), and Brainlab; has received honoraria for past educational seminars from AstraZeneca, Elekta AB, Varian, Brainlab, Cerapedics, Seagen, and Carbo FIX; is a vice president of the International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society; is a cochair of the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Tumor, belongs to the Elekta MR-Linac Research Consortium; is a Clinical Steering Committee member; and chairs the Elekta Oligometastases Group and the Elekta Gamma Knife Icon Group. Shankar Siva received salary support from Cancer Council Victoria via the Colebatch Fellowship; grants or contracts from Varian, Bayer Pharmaceuticals, and Merck Sharp & Dohme; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker's bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AstraZeneca, Varian, Roche Pharmaceuticals, and Telix Pharmaceuticals; a leadership or fiduciary role on the American Society of Radiation Oncology Science Council and the Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques committee of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer; and is on the board of directors of the Radiosurgery Society, within the past 36 months. Balamurugan Vellayappan reports honoraria from Elekta and support for travel from Brainlab. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest. Artificial Intelligence was not utilized in this effort., (Copyright © 2024 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Meningiomas represent the most common primary tumor of the central nervous system. Current treatment options include surgical resection with or without adjuvant radiation therapy (RT), definitive RT, and observation. However, the radiation dose, fractionation, and margins used to treat patients with WHO grade 2 meningiomas, which account for approximately 20% of all meningiomas, are not clearly defined, and deciding on the optimal treatment modality can be challenging owing to the lack of randomized data., Methods and Materials: In this manuscript, 3 cases of patients with WHO grade 2 meningiomas are presented with descriptions of treatment options after gross total resection, subtotal resection, and previous irradiation. Treatment recommendations were compiled from 9 central nervous system radiation oncology and neurosurgery experts from The Radiosurgery Society, and the consensus of treatment recommendations is reported., Results: Both conventional and stereotactic RT are treatment options for WHO grade 2 meningiomas. The majority of prospective data in the setting of WHO grade 2 meningiomas involve larger margins. Stereotactic radiosurgery/hypofractionated stereotactic RT are less appropriate in this setting. Conventionally fractionated RT to at least 59.4 Gy is considered standard of care with utilization of preoperative and postoperative imaging to evaluate the extent of disease and possible osseous involvement. After careful discussion, stereotactic radiosurgery/hypofractionated stereotactic RT may play a role for the subset of patients who are unable to tolerate the standard lengthy conventionally fractionated treatment course, for those with prior RT, or for small residual tumors. However, more studies are needed to determine the optimal approach., Conclusions: This case-based evaluation of the current literature seeks to provide examples for the management of grade 2 meningiomas and give examples of both conventional and stereotactic RT., Competing Interests: Disclosures A.S. has grants/contracts from Elekta AB and Seagen through his institution, as well as consulting fees from Varian, Elekta, and BrainLAB. He also has honoraria from AstraZeneca, Elekta AB, Varian, BrainLAB, and Seagen. He has leadership roles in the International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society as well as the SO Spine Knowledge Forum Tumor. He is a member of the Elekta MR Linac Research Consortium, the Elekta Oligometastases Group, and the Elekta Gamma Knife Icon Group. I.G. has a leadership role on the ASTRO and Radiosurgery Society BOD. He receives honoraria for lectures and from Accuray, Inc. E.C. has travel support for travel to ICOTEC meetings. F.E. has honoraria and travel support from ZAP Surgical Systems, Inc. G.G.K. has consulting fees from Varian Medical Systems. J.P. has grants/contracts from Genentech, NIH R702, NIH R01CA269948. He also has honoraria from Varian Medical Systems, Novocure, ICOTEC, and Carbofix. He is on the Novocure advisory board. He has a leadership role in the Spine Therapy Society as a Steering Committee Member. J.K. has consulting fees from Reflexion, ICOTEC, CarboFix, Accuray, Varian, Elekta, ViewRay, and Brainlab. He has honoraria from Varian, ICOTEC, Carbofix, Acurray, BrainLab, ViewRay. He has a leadership role in ASTRO, RSS, and the Accuray Exchange Community. K.R. has grants/contracts from Accuray, Canon, and ICOTEC. She receives an honoraria from Accuray.. She receives support for attending meetings from Elekta AB, Accuray, Brainlab, RSS, and AAPM. She has a radiogenomics patent shared with Canon under development. She participates on the BioMimetix Board. She is a CNS track chair leader for the ASTRO education committee. M.S. has consulting fees from Hyperfine, Inc. He receives support for attending meetings from the World Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery. He participates on the board for Alpheus, Inc. He is the president of the Brain Tumor Foundation. He is a stock holder for Hyperfine, Inc. S.C. receives payments from GE Health care, Varian Medical Systems, and Blue Earth Diagnostics. S.L. has research funding from Kuni Foundation and Hutchinson Center as Lead Academic Participating Site. He receives support for attending the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology (JASTRO). He has a leadership role in the Radiosurgery Society and American College of Radiology. All other authors have no disclosures., (Copyright © 2024 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Medically refractory epilepsy (MRE) occurs in about 30 % of patients with epilepsy, and the treatment options available to them have evolved over time. The classic treatment for medial temporal lobe epilepsy (mTLE) is anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL), but an initiative to find less invasive options has resulted in treatments such as neuromodulation, ablative procedures, and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). SRS has been an appealing non-invasive option and has developed an increasing presence in the literature over the last few decades. This article provides an overview of SRS for MRE with two example cases, and we discuss the optimal technique as well as the advantages, alternatives, and risks of this therapeutic option., Cases: We present two example cases of patients with MRE, who were poor candidates for invasive surgical treatment options and underwent SRS. The first case is a 65-year-old female with multiple medical comorbidities, whose seizure focus was localized to the left temporal lobe, and the second case is a 19-year-old male with Protein C deficiency and medial temporal lobe sclerosis. Both patients underwent SRS to targets within the medial temporal lobe, and both achieve significant improvements in seizure frequency and severity., Discussion: SRS has generally been shown to be inferior to ATL for seizure reduction in medically refractory mTLE. However, there are patients with epilepsy for which SRS can be considered, such as patients with medical comorbidities that make surgery high risk, patients with epileptogenic foci in eloquent cortex, patients who have failed to respond to surgical management, patients who choose not to undergo surgery, and patients with geographic constraints to epilepsy centers. Patients and their physicians should be aware that SRS is not risk-free. Patients should be counseled on the latency period and monitored for risks such as delayed cerebral edema, visual field deficits, and radiation necrosis., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Purpose: Data informing the safety, efficacy, treatment logistics, and dosimetry of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for lung tumors has primarily been derived from patients with favorably located solitary tumors. SBRT is now considered a standard-of-care treatment for inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer and lung metastases, and therefore extrapolation beyond this limited foundational patient population remains an active source of interest., Methods and Materials: This case-based discussion provides a practical framework for delivering SBRT to challenging, yet frequently encountered, cases in radiation oncology. The cases highlighted herein include the use of SBRT for ultracentral tumors, multiple tumors, and reirradiation. Patient characteristics, fractionation, prescription dose, treatment technique, and dose constraints are discussed. Relevant literature to these cases is summarized to provide a framework for the treatment of similar patients., Results: Treatment of challenging cases with lung SBRT requires many considerations, including treatment intent, fractionation selection, tumor localization, and plan optimization. In such scenarios, patient selection is critical to understanding the risk-benefit profile of an SBRT approach despite significant advances in delivery techniques and safety., Conclusions: A case-based discussion was developed by the Radiosurgery Society to provide a practical guide to the common challenging scenarios noted above affecting patients with lung tumors. A multidisciplinary approach should guide the treatment of such cases to maximize the therapeutic window., Competing Interests: Disclosures Ben Slotman receives speaker fees from Varian Medical Systems. Colton Ladbury has research grant funding from RefleXion Medical and AstraZeneca. Percy Lee receives consulting fees (from Varian, ViewRay, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Johnson & Johnson, Roche, and RTOG foundation), honoraria (from Varian, ViewRay, and AstraZeneca), travel support (from Radiosurgery Society), serves in an advisory role (to Genentech, ViewRay, AstraZeneca, Roche), and has leadership roles (in Radiosurgery Society and ASTRO)., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for gynecologic malignancies is controversial. We discuss certain circumstances when highly precise SBRT may be a useful tool to consider in the management of selected patients., Methods and Materials: Case selection included the following scenarios, the first 2 with palliative intent, para-aortic nodal oligorecurrence of ovarian cancer, pelvic sidewall oligorecurrence of cervical cancer, and inoperable endometrial cancer boost after intensity modulated radiation to the pelvis treated with curative intent. Patient characteristics, fractionation, prescription dose, treatment technique, and dose constraints were discussed. Relevant literature to these cases was summarized to provide a framework for treatment of similar patients., Results: Treatment of gynecologic malignancies with SBRT requires many considerations, including treatment intent, optimal patient selection, fractionation selection, tumor localization, and plan optimization. Although other treatment paradigms including conventionally fractionated radiation therapy and brachytherapy remain the standard-of-care for definitive treatment of gynecologic malignancies, SBRT may have a role in palliative cases or those where high doses are not required due to the unacceptable toxicity that may occur with SBRT., Conclusions: A case-based practice review was developed by the Radiosurgery Society to provide a practical guide to the common scenarios noted above affecting patients with gynecologic malignancies., Competing Interests: Disclosure Sushil Beriwal reports employment by Varian, membership on the Xoft DSMB, and is a consultant for Elsevier ClinicalPath. Beth Erickson reports serving on the ASTRO Board of Directors as the Chair of the Educational Council. David Gaffney reports grant funding from Elekta and NCI UG1 LAPS and serving as chair of the Merck DSMC. Simon S. Lo reports grant funding from Kuni Foundation, Hutchinson Center, and Elekta, travel support from the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology (JASTRO) and serves as Member of Board of Directors and National Medical Director of the Distinction in Practice in Stereotactic Radiotherapy Program for the Radiosurgery Society and Alternate Councilor for the American College of Radiology., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: A bolus is required when treating scalp lesions with photon radiation therapy. Traditional bolus materials face several issues, including air gaps and setup difficulty due to irregular, convex scalp geometry. A 3D-milled bolus is custom-formed to match individual patient anatomy, allowing improved dose coverage and homogeneity. Here, we describe the creation process of a 3D-milled bolus and report the outcomes for patients with scalp malignancies treated with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) utilizing a 3D-milled bolus., Materials and Methods: Twenty-two patients treated from 2016 to 2022 using a 3D-milled bolus and VMAT were included. Histologies included squamous cell carcinoma ( n = 14, 64%) and angiosarcoma ( n = 8, 36%). A total of 7 (32%) patients were treated in the intact and 15 (68%) in the postoperative setting. The median prescription dose was 66.0 Gy (range: 60.0-69.96)., Results: The target included the entire scalp for 8 (36%) patients; in the remaining 14 (64%), the median ratio of planning target volume to scalp volume was 35% (range: 25-90%). The median dose homogeneity index was 1.07 (range: 1.03-1.15). Six (27%) patients experienced acute grade 3 dermatitis and one (5%) patient experienced late grade 3 skin ulceration. With a median follow-up of 21.4 months (range: 4.0-75.4), the 18-month rates of locoregional control and overall survival were 75% and 79%, respectively., Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study to report the clinical outcomes for patients with scalp malignancies treated with the combination of VMAT and a 3D-milled bolus. This technique resulted in favorable clinical outcomes and an acceptable toxicity profile in comparison with historic controls and warrants further investigation in a larger prospective study.

Background/objective: Intra-operative radiation therapy (IORT) is a newer partial breast irradiation technique that has been well studied in 2 large randomized trials, the TARGIT-A and ELIOT trials. We initiated our IORT program in 2018 in the context of a registry trial, and aim to report our early results thus far., Methods: We instituted an IORT practice using Intrabeam® low energy 50kVp x-rays for selected breast cancer cases in 2018. Patients were enrolled on our institutional registry protocol which allowed for IORT in ER + patients with grade 1-2 DCIS ≤ 2.5 cm or invasive disease ≤ 3.5 cm in patients of at least 45 years of age., Results: Between January 2018 and December 2021, 181 patients with clinical stage 0-IIA ER + breast cancer were evaluated. One hundred sixty-seven patients ultimately received IORT to 172 sites. The majority of patients received IORT at the time of initial diagnosis and surgery (160/167; 95.8%). Re-excision post IORT occurred in 16/167 patients (9.6%) due to positive margins. Adjuvant RT to the whole breast +/- LN was ultimately given to 23/167 (13.8%) patients mainly due to positive sentinel LN found on final pathology (12/23; 52%); other reasons were close margins for DCIS (3/23; 13%), tumor size (3/23; 4.3%), and multifactorial (5/23; 17.4%). Five patients (3%) had post-operative complications of wound dehiscence. There were 3 local recurrences (1.6%) at a median follow-up of 27.9 months (range: 0.7- 54.8 months)., Conclusions: IORT has been proven to be a safe and patient-centered form of local adjuvant RT for our population, in whom compliance with a longer course of external beam radiation can be an issue. Long term efficacy remains to be evaluated through continued follow up. In the era of COVID-19 and beyond, IORT has been an increasingly attractive option, as it greatly minimizes toxicities and patient visits to the clinic., Trial Registration: All patients were prospectively enrolled on an institutional review board-approved registry trial (IRB number: 2018-9409)., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: A nadir Prostate-Specific Antigen (nPSA) of 0.06 ng/mL has been shown to be a strong independent predictor of biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) in patients with intermediate or high-risk (HR) prostate cancer treated with definitive external beam radiation therapy (RT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). We aimed to examine the association between the duration of ADT and bRFS in HR localized prostate cancer, based on nPSA., Methods: Between 1998 and 2015, 204 patients with HR localized prostate cancer were identified. Of them, 157 patients (77.0%) reached the desired nPSA of < 0.06 ng/mL (favorable group), while 47 (23.0%) did not (unfavorable group). Duration of ADT varied among patients depending on physician preference, patient tolerance, and/or compliance. Survival outcomes were calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods and predictors of outcomes using multi-variable cox regression model., Results: In the favorable group, ADT for at least 12 months lead to superior bRFS compared to ≤ 9 months of ADT (P = 0.036). However, no significant difference was seen when examining the value of receiving ADT beyond 12, 18, or 24 months, respectively. On univariate analysis for bRFS, the use of ADT for at least 12 months was significant (P = 0.012) as well as time to nadir PSA (tnPSA), (≤ 6 vs > 6 months); (P = 0.043). The presenting T stage was borderline significant (HR 3.074; 95% CI 0.972-9.719; P = 0.056), while PSA at presentation, Gleason Score and age were not. On multivariate analysis, the use of ADT for 12 months (P = 0.012) and tnPSA (P = 0.037) remained significant. In the unfavorable group, receiving ADT beyond 9 and 12 months was associated with improved bRFS (P = 0.044 and 0.019, respectively). However, beyond 18 months, there was no significant difference., Conclusion: In HR localized prostate cancer patients treated with definitive RT and ADT, the total duration of ADT may be adjusted according to treatment response using nPSA. In patients reaching a nPSA below 0.06 ng/mL, a total of 12 months of ADT may be sufficient, while in those not reaching a nPSA below 0.06 ng/mL, a total duration of 18 months is required., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: First-line immunotherapy (IMT), with or without cytotoxic chemotherapy, is now recommended for most patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with no targetable mutations. We reviewed outcomes for NSCLC patients treated with first-line IMT at our institution to test the hypothesis that measures of disease burden on staging FDG-PET/CT have prognostic value., Materials and Methods: Patient, disease, and treatment details were collected. A gradient-based segmentation tool was used to delineate each PET-avid extracranial lesion. Numbers of extrathoracic lesions and metabolic tumor volumes were tabulated. Oligometastatic disease (OMD) was defined as having ≤3 extrathoracic lesions, with any number of thoracic lesions. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates following initiation of IMT were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and predictors of PFS and OS were assessed using Cox proportional hazards models and logrank tests., Results: One hundred twenty-four patients met inclusion criteria, and 1143 lesions were contoured. The presence of OMD was associated with favorable PFS (median 13.1 vs. 6.9 months; P = .016) and favorable OS (median 36.5 vs. 15.4 months; P = .002). In multivariable models, OMD was associated with favorable PFS (HR = 0.64; P = .034) and favorable OS (HR = 0.61; P = .063), and metabolic tumor volumes exceeding the cohort median (88 cc) was associated with inferior OS (HR = 1.85; P = .028)., Conclusion: For advanced NSCLC patients receiving first-line IMT, the presence of extrathoracic OMD and low volumetric disease burden on PET are favorable prognostic factors that could be useful stratification factors in clinical trials and may influence clinical decisions about local and systemic therapy., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Patients with early-stage nodal follicular lymphoma (FL) may be rendered free of detectable disease by a diagnostic excisional biopsy. We reviewed the management and outcomes of 48 patients with FL, diagnosed from 2003-2013, treated at a single institution. The primary endpoints were local control (LC) and progression-free survival (PFS).Median age at diagnosis was 54.5 years (range 15-74 years). Forty-seven patients were stage I (97.9%); 15 patients (31.3%) had grade 3 disease. Initial management consisted of observation (12 patients; 25.0%), radiation therapy (RT) alone (12 patients; 25.0%), systemic therapy alone (9 cases; 18.8%), or both (15 patients; 31.3%). Median follow-up was 4.92 years (range 0.5-13.83 years). 4-year PFS and OS were 80.9% and 97.1%, respectively. Patients treated with additional therapy experienced significantly better 4-year LC (100% vs. 81.8%; p  = .012) and 4-year PFS (86.7% vs. 63.6%; p  = .006).Patients with completely resected limited-stage FL would benefit from therapy beyond excisional biopsy alone.

Purpose: We previously reported that ∼30% of patients with localized follicular lymphoma (FL) staged by 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography receiving primary radiation therapy (RT) will relapse within 5 years. We sought to report outcomes for those who relapsed., Methods and Materials: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study of patients aged ≥18 years who received RT ≥ 24 Gy for stage I to II, grade 1 to 3A FL, staged with 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose ( 18 F-FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography. Observation was defined as >6 months without treatment from relapse. Overall survival (OS) and freedom from progression (FFP) were estimated with Kaplan-Meier analysis and univariable and multivariable analyses with Cox regression., Results: Of 512 patients with median follow-up of 52 months, 149 (29.1%) developed recurrent lymphoma at a median of 23 months (range, 1-143) after primary RT. Median follow-up was 33 months after relapse. Three-year OS was 91.4% after recurrence. OS was significantly worse for those with relapse ≤12 months from date of diagnosis versus all others-88.7% versus 97.6%, respectively (P = .01)-and remained significantly worse on multivariable analyses (follicular lymphoma international prognostic index-adjusted hazard ratio, 3.61; P = .009). Histology at relapse included 93 indolent (grade 1-3A), 3 FL grade 3B/not otherwise specified, and 18 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; 35 patients did not undergo biopsy. Of those with follow-up ≥3 months who underwent biopsy (n = 74) or had presumed (n = 23) indolent recurrence, 58 patients (59.8%) were observed, 19 (19.6%) had systemic therapy, 16 (16.5%) had RT, and 4 (4.1%) had systemic therapy + RT. For patients with indolent recurrences that were observed, 3-year FFP or freedom from treatment was 56.6% (median, 48 months). For all patients with biopsied/presumed indolent recurrence receiving salvage treatment (n = 59, including 20 initially observed) 3-year FFP was 73.9%., Conclusions: Prognosis for patients with relapsed FL after primary radiation therapy is excellent, supporting the role of primary radiation in the management of early stage disease. Patients with localized FL treated with primary RT who experience early relapse (<12 months) have inferior survival compared with those with longer disease-free interval., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: A lower proportion of CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in mycosis fungoides (MF) patients is associated with worse survival. However, it is not known whether circulating CD4:CD8 ratio is a prognosticator of response to total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT)., Methods and Materials: We identified 126 MF patients treated with TSEBT from 2001 to 20014 at two high-volume academic centers. Circulating CD4:CD8 ratio was obtained within 1 week before TSEBT. TSEBT was delivered with 6-9mEV electrons with low (12 Gy) or conventional (≥12 Gy) doses. Treatment response was assessed with the modified Severity Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT). Post-treatment mSWAT decrease of ≥75% was classified as near complete response (CR) while mSWAT decrease of <75% was considered partial response (PR). Receiver operating characteristic analysis determined an optimal CD4:CD8 threshold value to predict TSEBT response in the derivation cohort and was applied to an external validation cohort., Results: 71.4% and 28.6% of patients achieved CR and PR after TSEBT. Higher CD4:CD8 ratio predicted poorer response: median CD4:CD8 in patients with PR vs. CR was 4.84 vs. 1.97 (p = 0.002). A threshold CD4:CD8 of 4.42 optimally discriminated in the discovery cohort patients with PR vs. XR (sensitivity 90%, specificity 59%, area under curve (AUC) = 0.71; p = 0.002). Within an independent test cohort (n = 32), 73.9% of patients with CD4:CD8 <4.42 achieved CR vs. 33.3% of those with CD4:CD8 ≥4.42 (p = 0.033). Among all patients with CD4:CD8 <4.42 (n = 73), 74% achieved CR with low-dose TSEBT vs. 93% with conventional dose TSEBT (p = 0.02). On multivariable logistic regression, CD4:CD8 remained a significant independent predictor of TSEBT response in all patients (OR = 0.107, 95% CI 0.395-0.290, p < 0.001)., Conclusion: Peripheral blood CD4:CD8 ratio was a significant independent predictor of TSEBT response of MF patients as validated in an independent cohort at separate academic center. The potential for CD4:CD8 ratio as a biomarker to inform radiation treatment dosing warrants further investigation., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Radiotherapy (RT) can be curative in patients with localized follicular lymphoma (FL), with historical series showing a 10-year disease-free survival of 40 to 50%. As 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose ( 18 F-FDG) positron emission tomography with computerized tomography (PET-CT) upstages 10 to 60% of patients compared to CT, we sought to evaluate outcomes in patients staged by PET-CT, to determine if more accurate staging leads to better patient selection and results. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study under the direction of the International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group (ILROG). Inclusion criteria were: RT alone for untreated stage I to II FL (grade 1-3A) with dose equivalent ≥24 Gy, staged by PET-CT, age ≥18 years, and follow-up ≥3 months. End points were freedom from progression (FFP), local control, and overall survival (OS). A total of 512 patients treated between 2000 and 2017 at 16 centers were eligible for analysis; median age was 58 years (range, 20-90); 410 patients (80.1%) had stage I disease; median RT dose was 30 Gy (24-52); and median follow-up was 52 months (3.2-174.6). Five-year FFP and OS were 68.9% and 95.7%. For stage I, FFP was 74.1% vs 49.1% for stage II ( P < .0001). Eight patients relapsed in-field (1.6%). Four had marginal recurrences (0.8%) resulting in local control rate of 97.6%. On multivariable analysis, stage II (hazard ratio [HR], 2.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44-3.10) and BCL2 expression (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.07-2.47) were significantly associated with less favorable FFP. Outcome after RT in PET-CT staged patients appears to be better than in earlier series, particularly in stage I disease, suggesting that the curative potential of RT for truly localized FL has been underestimated., (© 2019 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Cardiophrenic lymph nodes (CPLNs) are occasionally involved in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). We characterized the incidence of CPLN involvement among 169 HL patients and evaluated outcomes after treatment with omission of the CPLN region from the involved-site radiation therapy (ISRT) field. Three types of RT fields were used: standard (S)-ISRT, reduced-dose (RD)-ISRT (lower dose to CPLNs, standard to other sites), or modified (M)-ISRT (omission of CPLNs). CPLNs were involved at diagnosis in 29 patients (17%). Of the 20 patients who received RT after complete response to chemotherapy, 4(20%) received S-ISRT, 8(40%) RD-ISRT, and 8(40%) M-ISRT. The four-year progression-free survival was 94.7%. One relapse occurred at a non-CPLN site after RD-ISRT. The mean heart dose and volume of the heart that received 25 Gy was higher for S-ISRT patients compared to M-ISRT ( p  = .043 and p  = .025, respectively). Re-planning the M-ISRT cases as S-ISRT resulted in significant increase in cardiac doses.

Background: For patients with primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the central nervous system (PCNSL), whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) to doses of ≥45 Gy are often given after a partial response (PR) to methotrexate-based induction chemotherapy. We conducted an exploratory analysis to determine whether lower-dose WBRT, given with a boost to sites of persistent disease, might be a reasonable alternative., Methods and Materials: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 22 patients with PCNSL who received WBRT, with or without a boost, after methotrexate-based induction chemotherapy. Outcomes were compared among patients according to response to chemotherapy using the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: Median follow-up was 52 months. All patients with a complete response (CR) (n = 5) received WBRT to 23.4 Gy. One CR patient died after an in-field relapse. Patients with partial response (PR) (n = 10) received a median whole-brain dose of 23.4 Gy with (n = 8) or without (n = 2) a boost; there were 2 relapses within the central nervous system (CNS). All PR patients were alive at the time of analysis. The overall survival ( P = .127) and freedom from relapse within the CNS ( P = .967) were not different for patients with CR versus PR. Baseline and follow-up neurocognitive evaluations were available for 4 PR patients, and there were no significant differences between pre- and post-treatment evaluations ( P > .05 for language, memory, visual-spatial, attention, or motor functions). All patients who progressed or did not respond to chemotherapy and then received WBRT had died at a median time of 3.4 months. Patients who progressed or did not respond to chemotherapy had worse overall survival ( P = .001) and freedom from CNS relapse ( P = .005) compared with CR patients., Conclusions: Among patients with a PR to induction chemotherapy, reduced-dose WBRT with a boost to residual PCNSL may be a viable treatment approach that merits further investigation.

Purpose: To identify predictors of hypothyroidism after chemoradiation therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and to compare outcomes after intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with those after 3-dimensional (3D) conformal radiation therapy (CRT)., Methods and Materials: Ninety patients who underwent involved-site IMRT in 2009 through 2014 were evaluated for treatment-induced hypothyroidism, defined as elevated thyroid-stimulating hormone or decreased free thyroxine levels (or both). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified individuals at low versus high risk based on dosimetric variables. Dosimetric cutoff points were verified with an external data set of 50 patients who underwent 3D-CRT., Results: In the IMRT group, most patients (75 [83%]) had stage II HL, and the median prescribed dose was 30.6 Gy; in the 3D-CRT group, 32 patients (64%) had stage II HL, and the median prescribed dose was 32.0 Gy. No differences were found in the proportions of patients with bilateral (P = .982) or unilateral (P = .074) neck involvement between the 2 groups. Hypothyroidism rates were marginally higher in the IMRT group, with estimated 3-year rates of freedom from hypothyroidism of 56.1% in the 3D-CRT group and 40% in the IMRT group (P = .057). Univariate analysis showed that smaller thyroid volume and higher thyroid dose were associated with hypothyroidism in both groups (P < .05). In the IMRT group, the percentage of the thyroid gland volume receiving ≥25 Gy (V25) and the absolute volume of the thyroid gland spared from 25 Gy (VS25Gy) were the strongest predictors of hypothyroidism (P = .001 and P < .001, respectively). Cutoff points of 63.5% (V25) and 2.2 mL (VS25Gy) classified patients as high risk (80%-82%) or low risk (37%-44%) (P < .001). Use of a thyroid avoidance structure reduced the incidence of hypothyroidism (P < .05) in the IMRT group., Conclusions: The percentage of the thyroid receiving 25 Gy and the volume of the thyroid spared from 25 Gy predicted the risk of hypothyroidism after either IMRT or 3D-CRT for HL. IMRT may confer a higher risk than 3D-CRT unless a treatment avoidance structure is used during planning., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The presence of bulky disease in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), traditionally defined with a 1-dimensional measurement, can change a patient's risk grouping and thus the treatment approach. We hypothesized that 3-dimensional measurements of disease burden obtained from baseline 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scans, such as metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG), would more accurately risk-stratify patients. To test this hypothesis, we reviewed pretreatment PET-CT scans of patients with stage I-II HL treated at our institution between 2003 and 2013. Disease was delineated on prechemotherapy PET-CT scans by 2 methods: (1) manual contouring and (2) subthresholding of these contours to give the tumor volume with standardized uptake value ≥2.5. MTV and TLG were extracted from the threshold volumes (MTV t , TLG t ) and from the manually contoured soft-tissue volumes. At a median follow-up of 4.96 years for the 267 patients evaluated, 27 patients were diagnosed with relapsed or refractory disease and 12 died. Both MTV t and TLG t were highly correlated with freedom from progression and were dichotomized with 80th percentile cutoff values of 268 and 1703, respectively. Consideration of MTV and TLG enabled restratification of early unfavorable HL patients as having low- and high-risk disease. We conclude that MTV and TLG provide a potential measure of tumor burden to aid in risk stratification of early unfavorable HL patients., (© 2018 by The American Society of Hematology.)

In 120 Stage I-IV testicular diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients treated from 1964 to 2015, we assessed the benefits of prophylactic contralateral testicular radiation (RT) and prophylactic central nervous system (CNS) therapy on overall, progression free, testicular relapse free, and CNS relapse free survival (OS, PFS, TRFS, and CRFS, respectively). Seventy percent of patients received RT, 53% received anthracyclines and rituximab (modern therapy), and 61% received CNS prophylaxis. On univariate analysis RT was associated with improved TRFS, PFS, and trended toward improved OS. On multivariate analysis (MVA), RT was significantly associated with improved OS and PFS; the PFS benefit persisted among patients receiving modern therapy. CNS prophylaxis was associated with improved OS, PFS, and TRFS, but not CRFS on univariate analysis, and was not significant on MVA. RT is associated with improved survival, and should be considered for all testicular DLBCL patients, but additional strategies are needed to prevent CNS relapse.

Background: The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of tumor characteristics and parameters of treatment response in predicting biochemical disease-free survival (BFS) for patients with intermediate or high risk prostate cancer treated by combined definitive external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)., Methods: Between June 1995 and January 2015, 375 patients with localized prostate cancer and a National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) intermediate or high risk categories were treated by definitive EBRT and ADT. Median duration of androgen blockade was 10 months (range: 3-36 months); Median radiation dose was 72 Gy (Range: 70-78 Gy). Median follow-up time was 5.8 years (range: 0.8-16.39 years). The main study endpoint was biochemical disease free survival (BFS)., Results: Forty seven patients (12.5%) developed biochemical recurrence (BCR) during the observation period. Monovariate analysis identified baseline PSA (bPSA) (p = 0.024), T-stage (p = 0.001), Gleason's score (GS) (p = 0.042), radiation dose (p = 0.045), PSA pre-radiation therapy (p = 0.048), and nadir PSA (nPSA), (p < 0.001) as significant variables affecting BCR. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve identified a nPSA of 0.06 ng/ml as optimal cut-off value significantly predicting the patients' risk of BCR (p < 0.001). Multivariate cox regression analysis revealed T-stage, GS, and nPSA as independent variable affecting BFS, while bPSA, age, and radiation dose were not., Conclusion: Nadir PSA at 0.06 is a strong independent predictor of BFS in patients with intermediate or high risk prostate cancer treated by definitive EBRT and ADT.

The diagnosis of lymphoma in pregnant patients poses a therapeutic challenge necessitating consideration of the developing fetus without compromise of therapy with curative potential for the mother. The decision to initiate therapy during pregnancy is heavily influenced by fetal, maternal, and disease-related factors, of which the most influential are the trimester at diagnosis, the stage, and aggressiveness of the disease and the presence of life-threatening symptoms. Recent data suggest that deferral of therapy until after the first trimester is desirable if it is perceived that postponement of therapy will not compromise maternal outcome. For some patients, delay of therapy to the postpartum period is feasible.

Purpose: The population of patients aged 80 years or older who are diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) continues to increase, but an optimal treatment strategy has not been established. We sought to examine the influence of consolidative radiation therapy (RT) on outcome and toxicity among the very elderly diagnosed with stage I-IV DLBCL., Methods and Materials: We evaluated 131 patients treated at a single institution between 2002 and 2014 who were eligible for RT after successful treatment with chemotherapy., Results: The median age was 83 years (range, 80-96). Advanced-stage disease was present in 61.8% of patients. Rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone was administered to 80% of patients (n = 108), and 23.7% of patients received consolidative RT. Among early-stage (ES) patients treated with 3 to 4 cycles of chemotherapy and RT (n = 12) versus 6 to 8 cycles of chemotherapy alone (n = 17), there were no statistically significant differences in 3-year disease-free, progression-free, or overall survival rates. The 3 year disease-free survival was 91.7% versus 88.2% among patients treated with combined modality therapy versus chemotherapy alone ( P = .78). The 3-year overall survival was 82.5% versus 87.5% among patients treated with combined modality therapy compared with chemotherapy alone ( P = .852). Anemia and neuropathy occurred more frequently among ES patients who received 6 to 8 cycles of chemotherapy alone. Among advanced-stage patients with bulky disease (n = 35), consolidative RT to sites of bulky disease may have improved local control (3-year local control, 100% vs 60.3%, P = .160)., Conclusions: Among patients aged 80 years or older who have with ES DLBCL, 3 to 4 cycles of chemotherapy followed by RT is at least equivalent in efficacy to chemotherapy alone and is associated with lower levels of toxicity, which suggests that it may be a better choice for therapy when trying to balance treatment efficacy and tolerability.