Search

B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia is frequent in Hispanic adolescents and young adults. Outcomes of implementation of pediatric-inspired regimens in low-and middle-income countries are not well known.In this study we treated 94 adolescents and young adults with a local BFM regimen designed to be affordable with the use of native L-asparaginase and mitoxantrone administered in an outpatient fashion, and the of BCR/ABL and measurable residual disease (MRD) determined by high sensitivity flow cytometry for risk stratification.Induction mortality was 11%; 25% of patients had to abandon treatment or be transferred to another health system. Two-year overall (OS) and event free survival (EFS) were 61.5% and 49.8%, MRD-negative patients had a 24-month OS of 85.6% vs. 69.6% (p = .024) and EFS of 76% vs. 45.5% (p = .004). Patients older than 40 years and those who abandoned treatment had worse EFS. Overall drug costs in our regimen were 52% lower than those of CALGB10403. The treatment of AYAs with ALL with an outpatient focus was implemented successfully at a reduced cost. Genetic risk assessment, treatment abandonment and lack of access to novel therapies remain major barriers for improving outcomes.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has an aggressive course and a historically dismal prognosis. For many patients, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) represents the best option for cure, but access, utilization and health inequities on a global scale remain poorly elucidated.To describe patterns of global HSCT use in AML for a better understanding of global access, practices, and unmet needs internationally.Estimates of AML incident cases in 2016 were obtained from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2019 study. HSCT activities were collected from 2009-2016 by the Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (WBMT) through its member organizations. The primary endpoint was global and regional use (number of HSCT) and utilization of HSCT (number of HSCT/ number of incident cases) for AML. Secondary outcomes included trends from 2009 to 2016 in donor type, stem cell source and remission status at time of HSCT.Global AML incidence has steadily increased, from 102,000 (95% uncertainty interval (UI): 90,200-108,000) in 2009 to 118,000 (104,000-126,000) in 2016 (+16.2%). Over the same period, a +54.9% increase from 9,659 to 14,965 HSCT/year was observed globally, driven by an increase in allogeneic (+64.9%) with a reduction in autologous (-34.9%) HSCT. While the highest numbers of HSCT continue to be performed in high-resource regions, the largest increases were seen in resource-constrained regions [+94.6% in Africa/East Mediterranean Region (AFR/EMR); +34.7% in America-Nord Region (AMR-N)]. HSCT utilization was skewed towards high-resource regions [in 2016: AMR-N 18.4%, Europe (EUR) 17.9%, South-East Asia/Western Pacific Region (SEAR/WPR) 11.7%, America-South Region (AMR-S) 4.5% and AFR/EMR 2.8%]. For patients70 years of age, this difference in utilization was widened; AMR-N had the highest allogeneic utilization rate, increasing from 2009 to 2016 (30.6% to 39.9%) with continued low utilization observed in AFR/EMR (1.7% to 2.9%) and AMR-S (3.5% to 5.4%). Across all regions, total HSCT for AML in 1HSCT remains a central curative treatment modality in AML. Allogeneic HSCT for AML is rising globally but there are marked variations in regional utilization and practices, including types of graft source. Resource-constrained regions have the largest growth in HSCT use, but utilization rates remain low with a predilection for familial related donor sources and are typically offered in CR1. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the reasons, including economic factors, to understand and address these health inequalities and improve discrepancies in use of HSCT as a potentially curative treatment globally.

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired bleeding disorder. Conventionally, first-line ITP therapy aims to obtain a rapid response and stop or decrease the risk of bleeding by increasing the platelet count. At this point, the duration of the response, the tolerability, and the long-term safety of pharmacologic interventions are considered less of a priority. Combination treatments that simultaneously address multiple disease mechanisms are an attractive strategy to increase efficacy in acute ITP therapy. In this review, we discuss the treatment of newly diagnosed ITP patients, emphasizing the use of new combinations to benefit from their synergy.This article summarizes conventional treatment, recent and novel combinations, and COVID-19 management recommendations of newly diagnosed ITP patients.The key areas for improvement consider the long-term effects of conventional first-line therapy, reducing relapse rates, and extending responses to achieve long-term remission. Although corticosteroids remain a first-line therapy, restricting their use to avoid toxicity and the increasing use of rituximab and TPO-RAs in the first three months after diagnosis open the landscape for future interventions in frontline therapy for ITP. First-line therapy intensification or synergistic drug combination offers a potential and realistic shift in future treatment guidelines.

Introduction: Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is an infrequent but fatal disease. Plasma exchange and corticosteroids continue to be the mainstay of treatment; however, repurposed drugs and novel agents are emerging as efficient treatment options.Areas covered: In this review, new therapeutic developments in immune-mediated TTP including rituximab, bortezomib, N-acetylcysteine, caplacizumab, and recombinant ADAMTS13, among others, are summarized.Expert opinion: Evidence on the use of rituximab in first and second-line settings is accumulating showing promising potential for avoiding relapses in patients in remission but with low circulating levels of ADAMTS13 in a preemptive fashion. Other repurposed drugs such as bortezomib and N-acetylcysteine are increasingly used off-label. Recombinant ADAMTS13 is slowly emerging. Caplacizumab, a humanized anti-von Willebrand factor-directed nanobody that blocks platelet adhesion and avoids microthrombi formation, was approved by regulatory agencies based on the positive results of a phase-III clinical trial, adding a new drug to the therapeutic arsenal in TTP.

Pre-apheresis peripheral blood CD34+ cell count (PBCD34+) is the most important predictor of good cell mobilization before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, albeit flow cytometry is not always immediately available. Identification of surrogate markers can be useful. The CD34+ cells proliferate after mobilization, resulting in elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity and correlating with the PBCD34+ count.To determine the LDH cut-off value at which adequate CD34+ cell mobilization is achieved and its diagnostic yield.A total of 103 patients who received an autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) between January 2015 and January 2020 were included. Demographic and laboratory characteristics were obtained, including complete blood count, pre-apheresis PBCD34+ and LDH levels. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed to identify the optimal serum LDH activity cut-off points for ≥ 2 and ≥ 4 × 10A post-mobilization serum LDH cut-off value of 462 U/L yielded a sensitivity (Se) = 86.8% (positive predictive value [PPV] = 72.7%), a pre- and post-mobilization serum LDH difference cut-off value of 387 U/L, an Se = 45.7% (PPV = 97%) and an LDH ratio of 2.46, with an Se = 47.1% (PPV = 97%) for an optimal mobilization count (CD34+ ≥ 4 × 10The LDH measurement represents a fast and affordable way to predict PBCD34+ mobilization in cases where flow cytometry is not immediately available. According to the LDH diagnostic yield, it could be used as a surrogate marker in transplant centers, supporting the CD34+ count, which remains the gold standard.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is most commonly presented in older adults; however, it appears 10 years earlier in Latin American countries. Clinical evolution in older adults from this populations has not been characterized. We analyzed outcomes and survival predictors.Patients ≥ 55 years old diagnosed with AML at a hematology referral center from 2005 to 2020 receiving intensive chemotherapy (IC), low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) and best supportive care (BSC) were included. Survival analysis included the Kaplan-Meier and Cox models and the cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR).Seventy-five adults were included and the overall survival (OS) was 4.87, 1.67 and 1.16 months, using IC, LDAC and BSC, respectively. The IC led to a higher OS (p 0.001) and was a protective factor for early death, at a cost of more days spent hospitalized and more non-fatal treatment complications; non-significant differences were found between the LDAC and BSC. Eight (10.7%) patients underwent hematopoietic cell transplantation, with a higher OS (p = 0.013). Twenty (26.7%) patients achieved complete remission; 12 (60%) relapsed with a 6-month CIR of 57.9% in those70 years old vs. 86.5% in those ≥ 70 years old, p = 0.034. Multivariate analysis showed the white blood cell count (WBC) and IC had a significant impact on the patient survival, whereas chronological age and the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) did not.AML in low-middle income countries demands a different approach; the IC improves survival, even with a high incidence of relapse, and should be offered as first-line treatment. Eligibility criteria should include WBC and a multidimensional evaluation. The age per se and the CCI should not be exclusion criteria to consider IC.

A total of 5642 hematopoietic cell transplants (HCT) in 5445 patients (2196-40% allogeneic and 3249-60% autologous) were reported by 127 teams in 14 Latin American countries that answered the 2018 LABMT/WBMT Global Transplant Activity survey. The transplant rate (defined as the number of first transplants per 10 million inhabitants per year) was 85 (51 autologous and 34 allogeneic) in 2018. The main indications for allogeneic HCT were acute leukemias (60%), while plasma cell disorders and lymphomas were the most common conditions warranting autologous HCT (50 and 36%, respectively). In the allogeneic HCT, HLA-identical siblings were the main type of donor (44%) followed by related mismatched/haploidentical donors (32%). Peripheral blood stem cells were used in 98% of the autologous and in 64% of the allogeneic transplants. From 2012 to 2018, there was a 64% increase of reported HCT (54% in autologous and 80% in allogeneic). In the allogeneic setting, the most pronounced increase in donor type was observed in haploidentical relatives (from 94 procedures in 2012 up to 710 in 2018), surpassing unrelated donors as of 2017. Significant trends detected in Latin America include rising numbers of the procedures reported, a faster increase in allogeneic HCT compared with autologous HCT and a significant increase in family mismatched/haploidentical donors. The LABMT/WBMT activity survey provides useful data to understand the HCT activity and trends in Latin America.

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has been given to persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) for over 20 years, and more than 3000 HSCTs have been done worldwide1,2. Transplant-related mortality in MS managed with HSCT, was considered a limiting factor but has decreased to < 2%2.

Hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) is usually performed in well-equipped units inside a hospital. The cost of this in-hospital transplant is usually very high; therefore, this procedure is more difficult to perform in low- and middle-income countries. Autologous outpatient HSCT is now a common procedure; however, outpatient allogeneic transplants are more complicated. Only a few centers in the world have incorporated outpatient HSCT. This transplant requires special adaptation, like a day hospital, careful selection of patients, oral medications, and the patient must live relatively close to the hospital. The results until now suggest that this outpatient transplant is factible and similar to inpatient HSCT. The objective was to review and describe the different methods and results following an outpatient allogeneic-HSCT strategy.

Introduction Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is a potentially curative treatment for many hematological diseases. However, lack of availability of specialized centers and high costs limit access to the procedure in low and middle income countries. Previous research has shown that Latin-American patients with hematological malignancies have worse outcomes when treated in public health systems compared to patients treated in the private setting. Healthcare in Mexico is provided by three systems: the private sector (financed by a private insurance or out of pocket), social security (government-run health systems) and a public system (partially funded by the government), where the most vulnerable population is treated. To date, disparities in outcomes of BMT between patients in public and private health systems have not been widely studied. Objectives Primary: to determine the impact of access to private healthcare in BMT recipients by comparing the outcomes of patients treated in two centers that are led by a single team. Secondary objectives were to determine differences in the overall treatment population and transplantation strategies in each context. Patients and Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients aged 15 and older who underwent BMT regardless of diagnosis form 2015-2021 in two Institutions: 1) A private hematology practice treating insured patients in conventional BMT units similar to those in high-income countries (Private) and 2) A public academic institution where an outpatient transplant strategy is common in the context of significant limitations in access to quality supportive care and high-cost medications (Public). Both programs are led by the same team of hematologists following similar transplant strategies with the salient features being the frequent use of peripheral blood stem cells, chemotherapy-based conditioning regimens, and the preferred use of haploidentical donors vs. matched unrelated donors. We excluded second transplants from this analysis and patients who received them were censored at the time of infusion. We compared baseline characteristics, overall survival (OS), event free survival (EFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), and the incidence of GVHD in the two different treatment systems. Results A total of 219 patients underwent BMT from January 2015 to June 2021, n=166 (76%) were performed in the Public setting, and n=53 (24%) in the Private setting. Patients in the Private group were older, with a higher proportion of high/very high disease risk index (DRI), hematopoietic cell comorbidity index (HCT-CI) and more frequent use of myeloablative conditioning (Table 1). A similar proportion haploidentical donor grafts were performed (61 vs 57%) with a single matched unrelated donor transplant in the Private center. Median follow-up was 9.7 (0.2-71), and 10.3 (0.7-67.6) months, for Public and Private centers respectively (p=0.38). Median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were similar. Seventy patients (42%) in Public, and 15 patients (28%) in Private groups relapsed (p=0.049), with a median time to relapse of 17.5 vs. 47.6 months (p Conclusion Patients who undergo BMT in the public health system are at risk for significantly worse outcomes when compared to patients cared for in private systems even if a similar strategy is followed and are led by the same team. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures González López: AMGEN: Honoraria; JANSSEN: Honoraria. Gomez-Almaguer: Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Gomez-De Leon: ASH: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria.

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ocular cyclosporine in the prevention of the development of ocular graft versus host disease (oGVHD) in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) in comparison with historic data. Design: We developed a longitudinal, observational, prospective nonrandomized study. We evaluated the feasibility of prophylactic use of topical cyclosporine A (CsA) to prevent or decrease the incidence of oGVHD and compared this with historic data. Methods: Patients undergoing AHSCT were treated with prophylactic topical CsA for 12 months after engraftment, followed by serial ophthalmic evaluations, including the Schirmer test. Results: Twenty patients were included. No serious adverse effects were reported. Poor adherence was documented in 15% of patients. In spite of observing extra-ocular GVHD (acute and chronic GVHD incidence of 50 and 45%, respectively), only 1 in 20 patients developed oGVHD over the 20-month follow-up for the entire cohort. No statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of oGVHD when compared to a historical cohort. Conclusions: Topical CsA as a prophylactic measure for oGVHD, administered over a period of 1 year after grafting, is safe and feasible and may decrease the incidence of ophthalmic manifestations of GVHD. These findings must be confirmed in a randomized trial.

PURPOSE: Establishing research capacity in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is key for improving the outcomes of patients with hematologic diseases globally. Few studies have analyzed the contributions of LMICs to global hematology. The American Society of Hematology Meeting (ASH) is the largest international academic event where peer-reviewed contributions in our field are presented. METHODS: In this cross-sectional analysis, all abstracts accepted to ASH 2018 selected for a poster or oral presentation were reviewed. Those that had a contributing author from an LMIC were identified. The proportion of LMIC abstracts across categories was analyzed. Country of origin, high-income country participation, the presence of a conflict of interest (COI), and sponsorship were determined. RESULTS: From 4,871 abstracts reviewed, 506 had a contributing author from an LMIC (10.4%), with 277 (54.7%) contributions in partnership with a high-income country. LMIC-independent contributions corresponded to 19 of 1,026 oral abstracts (1.9%) and 209 of 3,845 posters (5.4%). Most abstracts from LMICs were clinical (n = 311; 61.5%) and multicentric in nature (n = 353; 69.8%). COI statements with the pharmaceutical industry were common (n = 214; 42.3%). Collaboration between LMICs was infrequent (n = 33; 6.5%). Upper-middle–income countries had 466 participations (81.5%), in comparison with 96 (16.8%) in low-middle–income and 10 (1.7%) in low-income countries. CONCLUSION: LMICs were responsible for a small fraction of abstracts at ASH18; low-income countries were practically absent. Almost half of accepted works represented a form of international collaboration, with clinical, multicenter studies predominating and COI disclosures a frequent and unexpected feature, reflecting the instrumental nature of LMIC participation and a lack of independent, robust, locally developed hematology research.

PURPOSE The COVID-19 pandemic is a colossal challenge for global health; nonetheless, specific subgroups face considerably higher risks for infection and mortality. Among patients with malignant diseases, those with hematologic neoplasms are at a higher risk for poor outcomes. The objective of this study was to register treatment modifications associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and their short-term consequences in Latin America. METHODS Multicenter, prospective, observational, cohort study including patients older than 14 years from 14 centers in four countries (Mexico, Peru, Guatemala, and Panama) who had a confirmed diagnosis of acute leukemia, and who were undergoing active treatment since the first COVID-19 case in each country until the cutoff on July 15, 2020. RESULTS We recruited 635 patients. Treatment modifications because of the COVID-19 pandemic were reported in 40.8% of cases. The main reason for such modifications was logistic issues (55.0%) and the most frequent modification was chemotherapy delay (42.0%). A total of 13.1% patients developed COVID-19 disease, with a mortality of 37.7%. Several factors were identified as independently associated with mortality, including a diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (odds ratio 2.38 [95% CI, 1.47 to 3.84]; P < .001), while the use of telemedicine was identified as a protective factor (odds ratio 0.36 [95% CI, 0.18 to 0.82]; P = .014). CONCLUSION These results highlight the collateral damage of COVID-19 in oncology patients.

We report the case of a patient diagnosed with a clinical relapse of acquired immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) who was successfully treated with low-dose rituximab plus corticosteroids without the use of plasma exchange (PEx), which was unavailable at the time due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Rituximab 100 mg weekly for 4 weeks was administered, combined with 1 mg/kg of prednisone, obtaining a complete hematological response in 6 weeks. This case suggests that PEx may be unnecessary for a subset of patients with relapsed TTP who are clinically stable without significant end-organ damage. A brief literature review regarding TTP patients treated without plasma exchange is also included.

After gaining experience conducting both auto and allografts in persons with hematological diseases in the HSCT programs in Puebla and Monterrey, México, this study outlines subsequent program autografting patients with autoimmune conditions. The first transplant in multiple sclerosis was conducted in Puebla on July 5, 2006. From 2015 we increased activity autografting persons with autoimmune conditions in the two campuses of the HSCT-México program: Puebla and Monterrey. By December 6, 2020, patient number 1,000 in the program was autografted. In our experience, a significant reduction in the expanded disability status scale score was achieved in all of the three phenotypes of the disease (from a median of 5.1 to 4.5 points), whereas the response rate (defined as a decrease of at least 0.5 of EDSS score regardless of baseline EDSS, or unchanged EDSS) was 83, 78, and 73% after 12 months in the relapsing-remitting, primary-progressive and secondary-progressive forms of multiple sclerosis, respectively. In addition to analyzing the viability, safety, and efficacy of our method, this study contributes new knowledge to the field of both stem cell transplantation and multiple sclerosis.

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a heterogeneous disease with an unpredictable course. Chronicity can develop in up to two-thirds of adults and 20-25% of children, representing a significant burden on patients' quality of life. Despite acceptable responses to treatment, precise etiology and pathophysiology phenomena driving evolution to chronicity remain undefined. We analyzed reported risk factors for chronic ITP and associated them with proposed underlying mechanisms in its pathogenesis, including bone marrow (BM) microenvironment disturbances, clinical features, and immunological markers. Their understanding has diagnostic implications, such as screening for the presence of specific antibodies or BM examination employing molecular tools, which could help predict prognosis and recognize main pathogenic pathways in each patient. Identifying these underlying mechanisms could guide the use of personalized therapies such as all-trans retinoic acid, mTor inhibitors, FcRn inhibitors, oseltamivir, and others. Further research should lead to tailored treatments and chronic course prevention, improving patients' quality of life.

Dear Editor, In April 1960, Dr. Álvaro Gómez-Leal, a hematologist trained at the Instituto Nacional de Nutrición Salvador Zubirán (INCMNSZ), presented during the first meeting of the Agrupación Mexicana para el Estudio de la Hematología, A.C., data on a transplant of allogeneic stem cells in a patient with acute leukemia done in Monterrey