1. The prevalence and prognostic value of concomitant eosinophilia in chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation
- Author
-
Katrine Mortensen, Ole Weis Bjerrum, Christen Lykkegaard Andersen, Anders Lindmark, Thomas A. Gerds, and Henrik Sengeløv
- Subjects
Adult ,Blood Platelets ,Male ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Adolescent ,Graft vs Host Disease ,Disease ,Gastroenterology ,Risk Factors ,immune system diseases ,hemic and lymphatic diseases ,Internal medicine ,Eosinophilia ,medicine ,Humans ,Transplantation, Homologous ,Glucocorticoids ,Skin ,Leukemia ,business.industry ,Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ,Hematology ,Middle Aged ,Myeloablative Agonists ,Eosinophil ,Prognosis ,medicine.disease ,Confounding effect ,Eosinophils ,Transplantation ,Graft-versus-host disease ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Oncology ,Concomitant ,Immunology ,Female ,medicine.symptom ,Stem cell ,business - Abstract
The prognostic significance of eosinophilia after myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains to be established. Patients, whom developed chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) after ASCT, were included ( n = 142). Eosinophil count was analyzed at cGVHD onset. We observed no significant association between EO and the grade of cGVHD, thrombocytopenia, nor extensive skin involvement. Importantly, we observed no significant association between cGVHD with concomitant eosinophilia and long-term clinical outcomes, and subgroup analyses revealed a considerable confounding effect of ongoing steroid treatment. In conclusion, we advocate that prognostic conclusions regarding cGVHD with concomitant eosinophilia after ASCT should be interpreted with caution.
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF