Search

Stefano Fagiuoli,1 Pierluigi Toniutto,2 Nicola Coppola,3 Domenica Daniela Ancona,4 Margherita Andretta,5 Fausto Bartolini,6 Fulvio Ferrante,7 Alessandro Lupi,8 Stefano Palcic,9 Francesca Vittoria Rizzi,10 Davide Re,11 Gema Alvarez Nieto,12 Candido Hernandez,13 Francesca Frigerio,14 Valentina Perrone,14 Luca Degli Esposti,14 Alessandra Mangia15 1Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca & Gastroenterology Hepatology and Transplantation Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy; 2Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, Udine, Italy; 3Infectious Diseases Unit, University of Campania L. Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy; 4Dipartimento Farmaceutico ASL BAT, Trani, Italy; 5UOC Assistenza Farmaceutica Territoriale, Azienda Ulss 8 Berica, Vicenza, Italy; 6Dipartimento Farmaceutico-Usl Umbria 2, Terni, Italy; 7Dipartimento Diagnostica Ed Assistenza Farmaceutica – ASL Frosinone, Frosinone, Italy; 8Struttura Complessa Di Cardiologia – ASL VCO, Omegna, Italy; 9Farmaceutica Territoriale- Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata Giuliano-Isontina (ASUGI), Trieste, Italy; 10UOS Farmacovigilanza e Monitoraggio Spesa Farmaceutica- ASL BAT, Trani, Italy; 11Servizio Farmaceutico Territoriale ASL Teramo, Teramo, Italy; 12Gilead Sciences, Medical Affairs Italy, Milan, Italy; 13Gilead Sciences, Global Medical Affairs, London, UK; 14Clicon S.r.l., Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Bologna, Italy; 15Gastroenterology and Transplant Hepatology, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, 24127, ItalyCorrespondence: Luca Degli Esposti, CliCon S.r.l. Società Benefit, Health, Economics & Outcomes Research, Via Murri, 9, Bologna, 40137, Italy, Tel +390544 38393, Email luca.degliesposti@clicon.itPurpose: The study aims at investigating the impact of polymedication and aging in the prevalence of multiple drug-drug interactions (DDIs) on HCV patients treated with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) or glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB).Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective analysis based on administrative data covering around 6.9 million individuals. Patients treated with SOF/VEL or GLE/PIB over November 2017–March 2020 were included. Index date corresponded to SOF/VEL or GLE/PIB first prescription during such period; patients were followed up for treatment duration. Analyses were then focused on patients with ≥ 2 comedications at risk of multiple DDIs. The severity and the effect of multiple DDI were identified using the Liverpool University tool.Results: A total of 2057 patients with SOF/VEL and 2128 with GLE/PIB were selected. Mean age of SOF/VEL patients was 58.5 years, higher than GLE/PIB ones (52.5 years) (p < 0.001), and patients > 50 years were more present in SOF/VEL vs GLE/PIB cohorts: 72% vs 58%, (p < 0.001). Most prescribed co-medications were cardiovascular, alimentary and nervous system drugs. Proportion of patients with ≥ 2 comedications was higher in SOF/VEL compared to GLE/PIB cohort (56.5% vs 32.3%, p < 0.001). Those at high-risk of multiple DDIs accounted for 11.6% (N = 135) of SOF/VEL and 19.6% (N = 135) of GLE/PIB (p < 0.001) patients with ≥ 2 comedications. Among them, the potential effect of DDI was a decrease of DAA serum levels (11% of SOF/VEL and GLE/PIB patients) and an increased concentration of comedication serum levels (14% of SOF/VEL and 42% of GLE/PIB patients).Conclusion: This real-world analysis provided a thorough characterization on the burden of polymedication regimens in HCV patients treated with SOF/VEL or GLE/PIB that expose such patients to an increased risk of DDIs. In our sample population, SOF/VEL regimen was more frequently detected on elderly patients and on those with ≥ 2 comedications at risk of multi-DDI, ie, among patients characterized by higher rates of comorbidities and polypharmacy.Keywords: administrative database, glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, hepatitis C, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir, polymedication

Valentina Perrone,1 Chiara Veronesi,1 Melania Dovizio,1 Domenica Daniela Ancona,2 Margherita Andretta,3 Fausto Bartolini,4 Arturo Cavaliere,5 Alessandro Chinellato,6 Andrea Ciaccia,7 Mariarosaria Cillo,8 Adele De Francesco,9 Nicola Enieri,6 Fulvio Ferrante,10 Simona Gentile,11 Cataldo Procacci,2 Loredana Ubertazzo,12 Adriano Vercellone,13 Domenico Lucatelli,14 Michela Procaccini,14 Luca Degli Esposti1 1CliCon S.r.l., Società Benefit-Health, Economics & Outcomes Research, Bologna, Italy; 2Dipartimento Farmaceutico, ASL BAT, Andria, Italy; 3UOC Assistenza Farmaceutica Territoriale, Azienda ULSS 8 Berica, Vicenza, Italy; 4Dipartimento Farmaceutico, USL Umbria 2, Terni, Italy; 5Farmaceutica Aziendale, ASL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy; 6Unità Operativa Farmacia Ospedaliera, ULSS 3 Serenissima, Mestre, Italy; 7ASL Foggia, Foggia, Italy; 8Dipartimento Farmaceutico, ASL Salerno, Salerno, Italy; 9Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria “Mater Domini”, Catanzaro, Italy; 10ASL Frosinone, Frosinone, Italy; 11Direzione Generale per la Salute, Campobasso, Italy; 12ASL Roma 4, Civitavecchia, Roma, Italy; 13ASL Napoli 3 sud, Napoli, Italy; 14Angelini Pharma, Roma, ItalyCorrespondence: Valentina Perrone, CliCon S.r.l., Società Benefit-Health, Economics & Outcomes Research, Via Murri 9, Bologna, 40137, Italy, Tel +39 3450316494, Email valentina.perrone@clicon.itPurpose: A retrospective analysis was conducted to estimate the number of patients with focal epilepsy and drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) and their characteristics, the therapeutic patterns, the consumption of health resources in a real-world Italian setting.Patients and Methods: A retrospective study was carried out on the administrative databases of a sample of Italian Health Departments, covering approximately 8.7 million health-assisted individuals. All adult patients with at least one hospitalization for focal epilepsy and an electroencephalogram (between 01/2010 and 12/2019), and at least one prescription of antiseizure medication (ASM) (between 01/2011 and 12/2018) were included in the study. Patients with at least two treatment failures and treated with a subsequent ASM were considered DRE.Results: Overall, 1897 patients with focal epilepsy (mean age 56 years, 47% male) were identified, of which 485 (25.6%) with DRE (mean age 53 years, 43% male). Among patients with focal epilepsy and DRE, respectively, 48% and 54% had essential hypertension, 23.4% and 26.6% had cardiovascular disease, and 46.3% and 62.1% had peptic ulcer/prescription of gastric secretion inhibitors. During follow-up, patients with focal epilepsy maintained first-line treatment for 53.9 months; among these, 52% passed to the second-line, and 485 (25.6% of the total) began third-line treatment. In patients with focal epilepsy, the mean cost was € 4448 (of which € 1410 were epilepsy-related), and in DRE patients total expenditures averages € 5825 (of which € 2165 were epilepsy-related). In both patients with focal epilepsy and DRE, hospitalizations represented the most impacting item of expenditure.Conclusion: The present analysis conducted in a setting of Italian clinical practice has shown that 25% of patients with focal epilepsy were resistant to antiepileptic treatments. Furthermore, these results showed that health-care costs for the management of epileptic patients were mainly accountable for the costs related to the disease-management and to hospitalizations.Keywords: epilepsy, real-world evidence, clinical practice, pharmacoutilization, healthcare resource consumption

Luca Degli Esposti,1 Chiara Veronesi,1 Domenica Daniela Ancona,2 Margherita Andretta,3 Fausto Bartolini,4 Alberto Drei,5 Alessandro Lupi,6 Stefano Palcic,7 Davide Re,8 Francesca Vittoria Rizzi,2 Elisa Giacomini,1 Valentina Perrone1 1CliCon S.r.l. Health, Economics & Outcomes Research, Bologna, Italy; 2Dipartimento Farmaceutico, ASL BAT, Trani, Italy; 3UOC Assistenza Farmaceutica Territoriale, Azienda ULSS 8 Berica, Vicenza, Italy; 4Dipartimento Farmaceutico, Umbria 2, Terni, 05100, Italy; 5Deloitte, Milano, Italy; 6Cardiology Unit, ASL VCO, Omegna, Italy; 7Farmaceutica Territoriale, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata Giuliano-Isontina, Trieste, Italy; 8UOC Assistenza Farmaceutica Territoriale, ASL Teramo, Teramo, ItalyCorrespondence: Valentina Perrone, Clicon Srl, Health, Economics and Outcomes Research, Via Murri 9, Bologna, 40137, Italy, Tel +39 544 38393, Fax +39 544 212699, Email valentina.perrone@Clicon.itPurpose: This real-world study investigates the direct healthcare costs from the perspective of the Italian Healthcare National Service of experienced statin users according to their level of adherence to therapy and to their cardiovascular (CV) profile in Italian settings of outpatients clinical practice.Patients and Methods: A retrospective observational analysis was performed based on administrative databases covering approximately 6 million health-assisted individuals. Adult patients with statins prescription between January 2014 and December 2016 were screened, and first prescription within this period was the index date. Follow-up lasted 1 year after index date. Only patients receiving statins prior index date (experienced statin users) were included and distributed in clusters based on their CV profile. Adherence was calculated during follow-up as proportion of days covered (PDC) and classified in low adherence (PDC< 40%), partial adherence (PDC=40– 79%) and adherence (PDC≥ 80%). Mean direct healthcare costs of drugs, hospitalizations, and outpatient services were evaluated during follow-up.Results: A total of 436,623 experienced statin users were included and distributed as follows: 5.5% in the previous CV events, 22.6% in diabetes, 55.7% in CV treatments and 16.2% in the no comorbidity cluster. Total mean annual cost/patient decreased from low adherent to adherent patients from € 4826 to € 3497 in previous CV events, from € 2815 to € 2360 in diabetes cluster, from € 2077 to € 1863 for patients with CV treatments. Same trend was reported for the cost item related to hospitalizations, which was the major determinant of the total costs. In previous CV event cluster, adherence was associated to a saving of € 879 on total costs.Conclusion: The study highlighted a decrease in overall mean costs as adherence levels increase, particularly for patients with previous CV events, showing how improving adherence could be associated to cost savings and suggesting suited strategy based on CV profile should be undertaken for adherence optimization.Keywords: direct costs, lipid-lowering drugs, medication adherence, real-life

This real-world analysis evaluated the clinical and economic burden of non-dialysis-dependent CKD patients with and without secondary hyperparathyroidism (sHPT) in Italy. An observational retrospective study was conducted using administrative databases containing a pool of healthcare entities covering 2.45 million health-assisted individuals. Adult patients with hospitalization discharge diagnoses for CKD stages 3, 4, and 5 were included from 1 January 2012 to 31 March 2015 and stratified using the presence/absence of sHPT. Of the 5710 patients, 3119 were CKD-only (62%) and 1915 were CKD + sHPT (38%). The groups were balanced using Propensity Score Matching (PSM). Kaplan-Meier curves revealed that progression to dialysis and cumulative mortality had a higher incidence in the CKD + sHPT versus CKD-only group in CKD stage 3 patients and the overall population. The total direct healthcare costs/patient at one-year follow-up were significantly higher in CKD + sHPT versus CKD-only patients (EUR 8593 vs. EUR 5671, p < 0.001), mostly burdened by expenses for drugs (EUR 2250 vs. EUR 1537, p < 0.001), hospitalizations (EUR 4628 vs. EUR 3479, p < 0.001), and outpatient services (EUR 1715 vs. EUR 654, p < 0.001). These findings suggest that sHPT, even at an early CKD stage, results in faster progression to dialysis, increased mortality, and higher healthcare expenditures, thus indicating that timely intervention can ameliorate the management of CKD patients affected by sHPT.

Anaemia is a uraemia-related complication frequently found in non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (ND-CKD) patients, with iron-deficiency anaemia (IDA) as the main underlying mechanism. Given the suboptimal anaemia management in ND-CKD patients with a co-diagnosis of IDA, this study evaluated the role of IDA therapy on clinical outcomes and healthcare resource consumptions in an Italian clinical setting. A retrospective observational real-world analysis was performed on administrative databases of healthcare entities, covering around 6.9 million health-assisted individuals. From January 2010 to March 2019, ND-CKD patients were included and diagnosed with IDA in the presence of two low-haemoglobin (Hb) measurements. Patients were divided into IDA-treated and untreated, based on the prescription of iron [Anatomical-Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) code B03A] or anti-anaemia preparations (ATC code B03X), and evaluated during a 6-month follow-up from the index date [first low haemoglobin (Hb) detection]. IDA treatment resulted in significantly decreased incidence of all cause-related, cardiovascular-related, and IDA-related hospitalizations (treated vs. untreated: 44.5% vs. 81.8%, 12.3% vs. 25.3%, and 16.2% vs. 26.2%, respectively, p < 0.001). A healthcare direct cost estimation showed that overall mean expenditure per patient reduced by 47% with IDA treatment (5245€ vs. 9918€, p < 0.001), mainly attributable to hospitalizations (3767€ vs. 8486€, p < 0.001). This real-life analysis on Italian ND-CKD-IDA patients indicates that IDA therapy administration provides significant benefits in terms of patients’ clinical outcomes and healthcare cost savings.