Search

Although follicular lymphoma (FL) patients relapsing within 24 months after first-line treatment (POD24) have a poor prognosis, some cases show notable survival after first relapse (SF1R). We aimed to characterize the POD24 FL population and to identify the main prognostic factors at progression. We selected 162 POD24 patients (80F; median age at first relapse 59 years) from a cohort of 1067 grades 1-3a FL-treated patients. The remaining 905 patients treated with first-line immunochemotherapy and diagnosed during the same period were used to compare outcomes in terms of survival. After a median follow-up of 11.0 years, 96 patients died (10y-SF1R of 40%). Age over 60 years (p 0.001), high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (p 0.001), haemoglobin (Hb) less than 120 g/L (p 0.001), advanced stage (p 0.001), high-risk Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) (p 0.001), histological transformation (HT) (p0.001) and reaching less than complete response (CR) after salvage therapy (p 0.001), predicted poor SF1R at relapse. In multivariate analysis only high-risk FLIPI and HT maintained prognostic significance for SF1R. POD24 patients not transformed and with low/intermediate FLIPI at relapse behaved better than the remaining cases. POD24 patients showed an excess mortality of 38% compared to the general population. Although outcome of POD24 FL patients is poor, a considerable group of them (low/intermediate FLIPI and not transformed at first relapse) behave better.

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) after relapse is associated with poor prognosis. No standard of care exists and available evidence for treatments is limited, particularly in patients who fail Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) therapy. This multicentre retrospective chart review study, SCHOLAR-2, addresses this knowledge gap and reports on data collected from 240 patients with relapsed/refractory MCL in Europe who were treated with BTKi-based therapy between July 2012 and July 2018, and had experienced disease progression while on BTKi therapy or discontinued BTKi therapy due to intolerance. The median overall survival (OS) from initiation of first BTKi therapy was 14.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.6-20.0) in the overall cohort, 5.5 months (95% CI 3.9-8.2) in 91 patients without post-BTKi therapy, and 23.8 months (95% CI 18.9-30.1) in 149 patients who received post-BTKi therapy (excluding chimeric antigen receptor T-cell treatment). In the latter group, patients received a median of one (range, one to seven) line of post-BTKi therapy, with lenalidomide-containing regimens and bendamustine plus rituximab being the most frequently administered; the median OS from initiation of first post-BTKi therapy was 9.7 months (95% CI 6.3-12.7). These results provide a benchmark for survival in patients with R/R MCL receiving salvage therapy after BTKi failure.

In the present study, we screened 84 Follicular Lymphoma patients for somatic mutations suitable as liquid biopsy MRD biomarkers using a targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel. We found trackable mutations in 95% of the lymph node samples and 80% of the liquid biopsy baseline samples. Then, we use an ultra-deep sequencing approach with 2 · 10− 4 sensitivity (LiqBio-MRD) to track those mutations on 156 follow-up liquid biopsy samples from 55 treated patients. Positive LiqBio-MRD correlated with a higher risk of progression both at the interim evaluation (HR 13.0, 95% CI 2.70–63.4, p p p p

BACKGROUND Cancer patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy face an elevated risk of developing serious infection as a consequence of their treatment, which lowers their white blood cell (WBC) count and, more specifically, their absolute neutrophil count (ANC). This condition is known as neutropenia. Neutropenia accompanied by a fever is referred to as febrile neutropenia (FN), a common side effect of chemotherapy with a high mortality rate. Timely detection of severe neutropenia (ANC OBJECTIVE This study aims to evaluate the usability of PointCheck™, a non-invasive optical technology for screening severe neutropenia, with the goal of identifying potential User Interface (UI), functionality, and design issues from the perspective of untrained users. METHODS We conducted a multi-center study using quantitative and qualitative approaches to evaluate the usability of PointCheck™ across N=154 untrained participants. We used a mixed-method approach to gather usability data through user testing observations, a short-answer qualitative questionnaire, and a standardized quantitative System Usability Scale (SUS) survey to assess user experience and satisfaction. RESULTS We found that N=108 (70.1%) of participants scored above 80.8 on the SUS across all sites, with a mean SUS score of 86.1 across all sites. Furthermore, the SUS results indicated that N=145 (96.0%) of users who completed the SUS survey found they learned how to use PointCheck™ very quickly, and N= 141 (93.0%) felt very confident using the device. CONCLUSIONS We have shown that PointCheck™, a novel technology for non-invasive, home-based neutropenia detection, can be safely and effectively operated by first-time users. In a simulated home environment, these users found it easy to use, with a mean SUS score of 86.1, indicating excellent perception of user experience and placing this device within the top 10th percentile of systems evaluated for usability by the SUS. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov: H12O: NCT04448314 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04448314 BMC: NCT04448301 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04448301

The ELARA trial indicates tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) is an effective anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (r/r FL). As ELARA is a single-arm trial, this study compares tisa-cel outcomes from the ELARA trial with usual care from a real-world cohort. ELARA enrolled 98 patients as of 29 March 2021 (median follow-up: 15 months from enrollment). Usual care data were obtained from ReCORD-FL, a global retrospective study of patients with r/r FL, who met similar eligibility criteria to ELARA. With a data cutoff date of 31 December 2020, 187 patients with ≥2 preceding treatment lines were included in the ReCORD-FL (median follow-up: 57 months from third-line) study. An indirect treatment comparison was performed for 97 patients from the ELARA trial and 143 patients from the ReCORD-FL study with no missing data on baseline factors. The line of therapy for which outcomes were assessed was selected or matched between cohorts using propensity score modeling. After baseline factor adjustment via weighting by odds, complete response rate (CRR; 95% confidence interval) was 69.1% (59.8%-78.3%) for tisa-cel vs. 37.3% (26.4%-48.3%) for usual care; overall response rate was 85.6% (78.7%-92.5%) vs. 63.6% (52.5%-74.7%). Kaplan-Meier probability of being progression/event-free at 12 months was 70.5% (61.4%-79.7%) for tisa-cel vs. 51.9% (40.6%-63.3%) for usual care, with hazard ratio (HR)=0.60 (0.34-0.86); 12-month overall survival was 96.6% (92.9%-100%) vs. 71.7% (61.2%-82.2%), with HR=0.2 (0.02-0.38). In conclusion, tisa-cel was associated with a 1.9-fold higher complete response rate and a 1.4-fold higher rate of being progression or event free at 12 months vs usual care, as well as a death risk reduction of 80%. The findings provide additional evidence on the benefit of tisa-cel in patients with r/r FL after ≥2 treatment lines. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03568461

The pathological increase of clonal IgM in Waldenström macroglobulinemia can be associated with acquired von Willebrand syndrome and can be a major risk of bleeding symptoms in this subgroup of patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia. The Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib is one of the approved treatments for symptomatic Waldenström macroglobulinemia. However, some controversy exists regarding the use of ibrutinib in these patients with high risk of bleeding because of its antiaggregant effect that could increase the risk of bleeding. Here, we present the case of a patient with Waldenström macroglobulinemia with associated acquired von Willebrand syndrome and progressively significant bleeding symptoms, who experienced a rapid increase in von Willebrand factor with ibrutinib treatment, despite only reaching a partial response in IgM levels similar to those reached with other previous treatments. We suggest that the control over the monoclonal protein is not the only mechanism that explains the good response, improvement in the bleeding symptoms and von Willebrand factor levels. This fact could be explained by the reduced glycoprotein Ib receptor expression induced by ibrutinib and the consequent von Willebrand factor increase in peripheral blood.

Objective/Background: Patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) with early therapy failure (ETF) within 2 years of frontline therapy have poor overall survival (OS). We recently reported the results of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients from the Grupo Español de Linfomas y Trasplantes de Médula Ósea (GELTAMO) registry treated with rituximab prior to ASCT and with ETF after first-line immunochemotherapy, leading to 81% 5-year OS since ASCT. We explored whether ASCT is also an effective option in the pre-rituximab era—that is, in patients treated in induction and rescued only with chemotherapy. Methods: ETF was defined as relapse/progression within 2 years of starting first-line therapy. We identified two groups: the ETF cohort (n = 87) and the non-ETF cohort (n = 47 patients receiving ASCT but not experiencing ETF following first-line therapy). Results: There was a significant difference in 5-year progression-free survival between the ETF and non-ETF cohorts (43% vs. 57%, respectively; p = .048). Nevertheless, in patients with ETF with an interval from first relapse after primary treatment to ASCT of

Background Patients with cancer undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy face an elevated risk of developing serious infection as a consequence of their treatment, which lowers their white blood cell count and, more specifically, their absolute neutrophil count. This condition is known as neutropenia. Neutropenia accompanied by a fever is referred to as febrile neutropenia, a common side effect of chemotherapy with a high mortality rate. The timely detection of severe neutropenia ( Objective This study aimed to evaluate the usability of PointCheck, a noninvasive optical technology for screening severe neutropenia, with the goal of identifying potential user interface, functionality, and design issues from the perspective of untrained users. Methods We conducted a multicenter study using quantitative and qualitative approaches to evaluate the usability of PointCheck across 154 untrained participants. We used a mixed method approach to gather usability data through user testing observations, a short-answer qualitative questionnaire, and a standardized quantitative System Usability Scale (SUS) survey to assess perceived usability and satisfaction. Results Of the 154 participants, we found that 108 (70.1%) scored above 80.8 on the SUS across all sites, with a mean SUS score of 86.1 across all sites. Furthermore, the SUS results indicated that, out of the 151 users who completed the SUS survey, 145 (96%) found that they learned how to use PointCheck very quickly, and 141 (93.4%) felt very confident when using the device. Conclusions We have shown that PointCheck, a novel technology for noninvasive, home-based neutropenia detection, can be safely and effectively operated by first-time users. In a simulated home environment, these users found it easy to use, with a mean SUS score of 86.1, indicating an excellent perception of usability and placing this device within the top tenth percentile of systems evaluated for usability by the SUS. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04448314; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04448314 (Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre registration) and NCT04448301; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04448301 (Boston Medical Center registration)

Patients with cancer are poorly represented in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) series, and heterogeneous series concerning hematology patients have been published. This study aimed to analyze the impact of COVID-19 in patients with lymphoma. We present a multicenter retrospective study from 19 centers in Madrid, Spain, evaluating risk factors for mortality in adult patients with COVID-19 and lymphoma. About 177 patients (55.9% male) were included with a median follow-up of 27 days and a median age of 70 years. At the time of COVID-19 diagnosis, 49.7% of patients were on active treatment. The overall mortality rate was 34.5%. Age >70 years, confusion, urea concentration, respiratory rate, blood pressure, and age >65 score ≥2, heart disease, and chronic kidney disease were associated with higher mortality risk (P < 0.05). Active disease significantly increased the risk of death (hazard ratio, 2.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-4.77; P = 0.01). However, active treatment did not modify mortality risk and no differences were found between the different therapeutic regimens. The persistence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2-positive polymerase chain reaction after week 6 was significantly associated with mortality (54.5% versus 1.4%; P < 0.001). We confirm an increased mortality compared with the general population. In view of our results, any interruption or delay in the start of treatment should be questioned given that active treatment has not been demonstrated to increase mortality risk and that achieving disease remission could lead to better outcomes.

Background Lymphoid neoplasms treatment has recently been renewed to increase antitumor efficacy and conventional chemotherapies toxicities. Limited data have been published about the infection risk associated with these new drugs, therefore this study analyzes the infectious complications in patients with lymphoproliferative diseases (LPD) treated with monoclonal antibodies (obinutuzumab, ofatumumab, brentuximab, nivolumab, or pembrolizumab), BTK inhibitors (ibrutinib and acalabrutinib), PI3K inhibitors (idelalisib) and BCL2 inhibitors (venetoclax). Methods Multicenter retrospective study of 458 LPD patients treated with targeted therapies in real‐life setting, in 18 Spanish institutions, from the time of their commercial availability to August 2020. Results Severe infections incidence was 23% during 17‐month median follow‐up; cumulative incidence was higher in the first 3–6 months of targeted drug treatment and then decreased. The most frequent etiology was bacterial (54%). Nine (6%) Invasive fungal infections (IFI) were observed, in its majority in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients treated predominantly with ibrutinib. Significant risk factors for severe infection were: severe lymphopenia (p = 0.009, OR 4.7, range 1.3–1.7), combined targeted treatment vs single agent treatment (p = 0.014 OR 2.2 range 1.1–4.2) and previous rituximab (p = 0.03 OR 1.8, range 1.05–3.3). Infection‐related mortality was 6%. In 22% of patients with severe infections, definitive discontinuation of the targeted drug was observed. Conclusion A high proportion of patients presented severe infections during follow‐up, with non‐negligible attributable mortality, but infection incidence is not superior to the one observed during the chemotherapy era. In selected cases with specific risk factors for infection, antimicrobial prophylaxis should be considered., Our data describe the infection risk associated with the use of targeted drugs in the treatment of lymphoproliferative diseases in real‐life setting and suggest some infection risk factors that could identify the need for antimicrobial prophylaxis in a selected group of patients.

BACKGROUND: Defibrotide is approved in European Union for the treatment of severe sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) after HSCT. However, it has also been used for SOS prophylaxis, moderate SOS and in other complications such as transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TAM). The objective of this study was to evaluate current uses, effectiveness and safety of defibrotide in patients with HSCT. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective study included patients treated with defibrotide for any indication at 28 HSCT centers of the Grupo Español de Trasplante Hematopoyetico (GETH) including the pediatric subgroup Grupo Español de Trasplante de Medula en Niños (GETMON). RESULTS: Three hundred and eighty eight patients treated with defibrotide between January 2011 and December 2018 were included. 253 patients were children, and 135 patients were adults. In total, 332 transplants were allogeneic, and the remainder were autologous. Main indications for defibrotide use were severe/very severe SOS in 173 patients, SOS prophylaxis in 135 patients, moderate SOS in 41 patients, TAM in six patients and suspected SOS in 33 patients. Overall survival (OS) at day +100 in the SOS prophylaxis group was 89% (95% CI, 87%-91%). In the group of patients with moderate and severe/very severe SOS, the OS at day +100 was 80% (95% CI, 74%-86%) and 62% (95% CI, 59%-65%), respectively (P = .0015). With a longer follow-up, median of 2 years (4 months-7 years), OS was 63% (95% CI, 59%-67%) in the SOS prophylaxis patients. OS for patients with moderate and severe/very severe SOS groups was 53% (95% CI, 47%-61%) and 26% (95% CI, 22%-30%), respectively (P = .006). 191 patients died, and SOS was the main cause of death in 23 patients (12%). CONCLUSIONS: Defibrotide has an acceptable safety profile with an improved response in severe/very severe SOS compared with historical controls, mainly in pediatric patients. Use of defibrotide for prophylaxis may improve prognosis of patients at high risk of complications due to endothelial damage such as those who receive a second transplant. SOS has an important impact on the HSCT long-term survival, as can be concluded from our study.

Induction and consolidation based on proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, and corticoids integrated with high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), are showing complete response (CR) rates >50% in multiple myeloma (MM).1-3 The addition of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies may increase these unprecedented CR rates.4-6 When more than half of transplant-eligible patients with MM achieve CR with frontline therapy, it is reasonable to ask, what other tests are clinically relevant after negative immunofixation. The achievement of deep responses with modern therapy led the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) to propose new guidelines that included definitions of negative minimal residual disease (MRD) for standard response criteria.7 Indeed, recent studies have reported nearly 50% MRD− rates,5,8,9 and, more importantly, the prognostic value of MRD criteria was validated in clinical trials8,10-12 and routine practice....

Background: Primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is a rare subtype of aggressive B-cell lymphoma. Most relapses occur within the first few months resulting in a dismal prognosis; therefore, it's important to identify primary chemorefractory patients at an early stage, to improve their prognosis. Our group have demonstrated that Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) detected by deep sequencing (DeepSeq) constitute a new non-invasive marker for monitoring response in follicular lymphoma (Jimenez-Ubieto A. et al. ASH 2020). CtDNA monitoring in PMBCL might help to better assess therapeutic response, correct false positive PET/CT results due to residual uptake of the mediastinum and define patients who will benefit from radiation therapy (RT). Here we analyzed the potential value of ctDNA monitoring in 11 PMBCL treated with R-DA-EPOCH between 2018-2020 in the Hospital 12 de Octubre. Methods: Genomic DNA from paraffin embedded (FFPE) lymph node biopsies were obtained from 11 PMBCL cases at diagnosis. Samples were sequenced with a short length Ampliseq Custom Panel (Thermo-Fisher) designed to cover all coding regions of 56 lymphoma specific genes with an average depth of 700x. After annotation and filtering, 5-8 somatic mutations previously described in lymphoma were selected to be screened in plasma samples. The plasma derived cfDNA was obtained from 8-16mL of peripheral blood collected in EDTA tubes and processed in less than 4h by column purification (QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit, Qiagen). A total of 31 different plasma time-points were sequenced in triplicates. On average 78ng (9-224 ng) of cfDNA was used for the DeepSeq of the specific mutations selected in each patient. An average coverage of 236.000x per triplicate was obtained for each mutation. The detection cut-off of 1E-4 was defined based on the LOD obtained in healthy controls donors. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT scans were performed on a General Electric Discovery MI Scanner at basal, interim (after 4 cycles), end of induction (EOI) and after radiotherapy (RT). Results: The median age was 33 years and 63.6% were female. Most cases (81.8%) were diagnosed with stage I or II disease and 27.3% cases present with extranodal involvement. On interim PET, 4 patients reached Complete response (CR) and 7 Partial Response (PR, DS4). At EOI, the number of CR turned to 6/11 (55%). All patients in PR at EOI (n=5) and two patients in CR (DS3) with residual mass received RT consolidation (median dose 32Gy). After RT the rate of CR was 91% (10/11). One patient progressed to a classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). None of the patients in CR have relapsed after a median follow-up of 22 months. One patient died due to a mediastinal synovial sarcoma. A total of 125 somatic mutations were detected in the 11 baseline samples with a median of 8 per patient (rank 5-35). The three most frequently mutated genes were SOCS1 (73%), B2M (55%) and TNFAIP3 (46%). Despite the reduced size of our cohort, the mutational frequencies were comparable to the described by Mottok A. et al (Blood 2018, Figure 1A). The DeepSeq of six diagnosis plasma samples showed a lower Variant Read Frequency (VRF) in cfDNA. On those paired samples, 25/28 mutations were detected in plasma, with a median VRF of 2% (0-53%) vs 24% (5.5%-87%) in Lymph nodes (Figure 1B). The rest of the plasma samples corresponded to 1st cycle (n=5), 4th cycle (n=6), EOI (n=7) and after RT (n=5). After 1 cycle of chemotherapy 3/4 patients who reached CR at EOI had already undetectable ctDNA (Figure 1C). One patient with positive ctDNA after 1 cycle needed RT to convert to CR. All the CR evaluations by PET-TC who had available ctDNA data, presented undetectable ctDNA (n=9). In the EOI analysis all+ patients except the one who progressed to cHL had undetectable ctDNA. In the PR interim evaluations 2/5 had undetectable ctDNA and converted to CR at EOI. Of the three patients with detectable ctDNA, one progressed to cHL (Figure 1D) and 2 needed RT to convert to CR. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that disease monitoring using DeepSeq of plasma ctDNA is feasible in PMBCL. Regarding prediction of relapse, the positive predictive value of ctDNA was 100%. An early ctDNA analysis (even after only one R-DA-EPOCH cycle) was able to predict patients in need of RT. Despite the DeepSeq of ctDNA could be useful to disease monitoring to prevent relapse and toxicity reduction by selecting cases in need of RT, more patients are necessary to draw meaningful conclusions. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Martín-Muñoz: Altum sequencing: Current Employment. Dorado: Altum sequencing: Current Employment. Heredia: Altum sequencing: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Rufian: Altum sequencing: Current Employment. Canales: Incyte: Consultancy; iQone: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy; Eusa Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead/Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria. Juarez: Altum sequencing: Current Employment. Sanchez: Altum sequencing: Current Employment. López-Muñoz: Amgen: Consultancy. Ayala: Incyte Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Martínez-López: Janssen, BMS, Novartis, Incyte, Roche, GSK, Pfizer: Consultancy; Roche, Novartis, Incyte, Astellas, BMS: Research Funding. Barrio: Altum sequencing: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.

Background: Heavily pretreated relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RR MM) constitutes a specific and unmet medical need. Median survival ranges from as little as 6 to 9 months, and responses to treatment are characteristically short (Richardson et al. 2007). Belantamab Mafodotin (BM), a novel anti-BCMA antibody conjugated to microtubule-disrupting agent monomethyl auristatin F, showed single-agent activity in the phase 1 DREAMM-1 and phase 2 DREAMM-2 studies in heavily pre-treated patients with RRMM (Lonial et al, 2019 & 2021). We aim to assess efficacy and safety of BM treatment administered via the expanded access compassionate care program for triple class MMRR patients in the region of Madrid (Spain). Methods: An observational, retrospective and multicenter study has been performed including all patients who received at least one dose of BM under the expanded access program in the region of Madrid (Spain) from Nov 2019 to Jun 2021. Hematology centers provided data from the medical records and entered them in a case report form distributed to the sites. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and the incidence of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs), with a major focus on ocular and hematologic toxicity. Results: A total of 33 patients (pts), from 14 different centers, were included from February 2020 till May 2021. Median age was 70 (46-79) years. 55% of the pts were women. Median time from diagnosis was 71 (10-858) months. 30.3% were high-risk cytogenetic features. Median of prior therapy lines was 5 (3-8) and at least 88% of the pts were triple class refractory. The median number of BM doses per patient was 3 (1-16) and the median follow-up was 11 months (95%CI 6.34-15.66). ORR was 42.2%, and 18.2% achieved ≥VGPR. Median PFS was 3 months (95%CI 0.92-5.08). Median PFS for patients who achieved ≥PR was 11 months (HR 0,26; 95% CI 0,10-0,68). No significant differences were found in PFS according to age, cytogenetic risk and prior therapy lines. OS was 424 days (95% CI 107-740). The incidence of non-hematological TEAEs was 57.6% and the most common of which was ocular toxicity (45.5%). The incidence of ≥G3 non-hematological TEAEs was 30.3%. 51.5% of the pts were diagnosed of keratopathy and 21.2% was ≥G3. 30.3% of the pts showed a reduced visual acuity, but this event was resolved in 92.9% of the pts. The most common symptoms were blurry vision (30.3%, n=10) and dry eye (24.2%, n=8). The incidence of ≥G3 hematological TEAEs was 18.2% and thrombocytopenia was the most frequent (21.2%). Dose reductions of BM were required in 30.3% of the pts and delayed in 36.4% due to TEAEs. Main causes for treatment discontinuation (81%, n=27) were disease progression (54.5%, n=18), toxicity (15.2%, n=5), death (6.1%, n=3) and due to patient's decision (3%, n=1). Conclusion: Compassionate use of BM in heavily pretreated RR MM pts showed a relevant anti-myeloma activity with a manageable safety profile.These results are similar to those observed in the DREAMM-1 and DREAMM-2 clinical trials. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Background Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most frequent subtype of HIV-associated lymphoma. Since the introduction of combined antiretroviral therapy (cART), the prognosis of HIV-related DLBCL has substantially improved, resembling that of the general population. However, non-Hodgkin lymphoma still remains the first cause of AIDS-related deaths. The International Prognostic Index (IPI) is the most widely used score for DLBCL and it has been validated in the rituximab era (R-IPI). However, it has limited accuracy to identify a very high-risk prognostic subset. Although IPI has been demonstrated to be useful for predicting prognosis in HIV-related DLBCL, new scores subsequently developed, such as National Cancer Comprehensive Network IPI (NCCN-IPI), GELTAMO-IPI and a new score, which includes data from peripheral blood count, have not been applied in the HIV setting. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic significance of the new variables -beta2-microglobulin (β2M), lymphocyte/monocyte (L/M) ratio and red blood cell width (RDW)- and to validate the new scores in a series of homogeneously treated HIV-related DLBCL patients. Methods Retrospective multicentric study of patients with HIV infection diagnosed with DLBCL in 16 hospitals from GELTAMO group in Spain, from 1998 to 2020. All patients were treated with R-CHOP and cART +/- radiotherapy. The main clinical and biological variables were collected. Peripheral absolute neutrophil, lymphocyte and monocyte counts were studied, including L/M ratio and CD4 + lymphocyte count. Moreover, HIV load, serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), β2M and RDW were evaluated. Univariable and multivariable analysis were performed using the binary logistic regression model for complete response (CR) rate and Cox proportional-hazards regression model for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Survival curves were plotted by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. The discrimination power of IPI, aaIPI (age-adjusted IPI), R-IPI, NCCN-IPI, GELTAMO-IPI and the new score including L/M ratio (L Bento et al., Br J Haematol. 2020) was assessed by the C-index. Results One hundred and five patients were retrospectively analysed with a median follow up of 7.08 (0.36-25.21) years. The characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 1. In the univariable analysis, performance status ≥2, extranodal sites ≥2, lymphocytopenia and low L/M ratio were associated with shorter OS and shorter PFS probabilities. Neutropenia was also associated with lower OS and advanced Ann Arbor stage was associated with lower PFS. On the other hand, monocytosis, low CD4 + lymphocyte count, positive HIV load and high values of serum LDH, RDW and β2M had no prognostic impact. By multivariable analysis, only L/M ratio With the aim of validating the prognostic power of each score system, the patients were divided in two groups: patients corresponding with low or intermediate-low risk versus those with intermediate-high or high risk. R-IPI, NCCN-IPI and the new score including L/M ratio showed significant differences in two groups for CR rate, OS and PFS. IPI also significantly discriminated the groups for PFS. NCCN-IPI was the strongest score to discriminate OS with a C-index of 0.638, and the new score including L/M ratio was the best one for CR rate and PFS discrimination, with a C-index of 0.669 and 0.666 respectively. Conclusions Lymphocyte/monocyte ratio is a strong prognostic factor, which can be used in patients with DLBCL and HIV infection. NCCN-IPI and the new score including L/M ratio provided the best discriminative capacity to predict prognosis in patients with HIV-related DLBCL treated with R-CHOP and cART. Supported in part by Gilead Sciences S.L., Spain (GLD19/00121); 2017 SGR288 (GRE) from CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya, and by funds from Josep Carreras International Foundation and "la Caixa" Foundation. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Lopez-Guillermo: Roche, Gilead/Kite, Celgene, Novartis, Janssen, AbbVie, Spectrum: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Salar: Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Research Funding. de la Cruz Vicente: Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Kirin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Eusapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Ferrer Lores: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Abrisqueta: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria. Sancho: Roche, Janssen, Celgene-BMS, Gilead, Novartis, Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche, Janssen, Celgene-BMS, Gilead, Novartis, Incyte, Beigene: Speakers Bureau. Ribera: SHIRE: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; TAKEDA: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; NOVARTIS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AMGEN: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Navarro: NOVARTIS, Roche: Honoraria; EUSA Pharma: Consultancy; GILEAD, EUSA Pharma: Research Funding.

Background Multiple myeloma (MM) constitutes approximately 10% of haematological malignancies, with a median age at diagnosis of 65 years. Patient survival has improved considerably over the last 20 years with the introduction of new drugs. In 1999, the first immunomodulatory drug, thalidomide, was approved, followed by lenalidomide in 2005 and pomalidomide in 2013. In 2003, proteosome inhibitors such as bortezomib were introduced and carfilzomib in 2014. In 2015, anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies such as daratumumab were added to the treatment schemes. We have analyzed the impact on the outcome of the introduction new drugs for MM in the last 20 years in our institution. Methods A total of 862 patients diagnosed with symptomatic multiple myeloma between 1999 and 2020 in a tertiary care hospital in Spain, Hospital 12 de Octubre in Madrid, were retrospectively analysed. Survival by age was evaluated over the years, establishing three groups: 1999-2005, 2005-2015 and 2015-2020. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used for analyzing overall survival, and differences between groups were tested for statistical significance using the log-rank test. Results A total of 862 patients were included in the study. There were 409 men (47.45%) and 453 women (52.55%). The median age at diagnosis was 69 years. Among the group of patients younger than 65 years, the median survival among patients treated between the period 1999 to 2005 was 49.28 months (16.86-81.70; 95%); 78.42 months (49.83-107.01; 95%) between the years 2005 to 2015 and the median is not reached between the years 2015 to 2020 (p=0.001). Equally significantly, patients younger than 75 years have improved survival over the years. Median survival among patients treated between 1999 and 2005 was 43.43 months (23.86. 63.00; 95%); 58.80 months (43.38-74.23; 95%) between 2005 and 2015 and the median is not reached between 2015 and 2020 (p Conclusion The introduction of new agents in the treatment of multiple myeloma has transformed the natural history of the disease, achieving long survival times in younger patients. Thus, it is essential to continue to advance and develop new therapies, as has been the case in recent years with the emergence of antiBCMA therapies.

BACKGROUND Patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), non-candidates for autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT), have few treatment options. Ibrutinib is an oral Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has shown increased antitumor activity in patients with DLBCL of different subtype from germinal center B-cell like (non-GCB). In the present phase II clinical trial (NCT02692248), we investigated the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of Ibrutinib with the R-GEMOX-D regimen (rituximab, gemcitabine, oxaliplatin and dexamethasone), in patients with non- GCB DLBCL. METHODS We included patients with histological diagnosis of non-GCB DLBCL (according to Hans algorithm), with relapsed or refractory disease after at least 1 line of immunochemotherapy and non-candidates for ASCT. Patients received an induction treatment consisting of 6 (in case of complete remission [CR] after cycle 4) or 8 (in case of partial response [PR] or stable disease after cycle 4) cycles of R-GEMOX-D at standard doses every 2 weeks, in combination with ibrutinib (560 mg daily), followed by a maintenance treatment with ibrutinib for a maximum of 2 years. The primary objective was to evaluate the overall response rate (ORR) after 4 cycles, and the secondary objectives were: CR rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. Analyses were performed in the intention to treat population (data cut-off 10th April 2020). RESULTS Sixty-four patients (59.4% male) were included between March 2016 and November 2018. Median age was 67 (25-84) years. Patients had received a median of 2 previous lines of treatment; 56.3% were refractory ( Of the 64 patients who started study treatment, 44 and 35 patients, respectively, were evaluated for response after 4th cycle and at the end of induction. Twenty-four (37%) patients started maintenance with ibrutinib, 7 of whom continue or have completed it. Causes of withdrawal from the trial (n=57) were progression (n=40), adverse event (n=6), transplantation (n=5), withdrawal of consent (n=3) and other causes (n=3). ORR and CR rate after 4th cycle were 53.2% and 35.9%, respectively. Patients with relapsed disease had significantly higher ORR (67.9% vs 41.7%, p=0.037) and CR rate (57.1% vs 19.4%, p=0.002) than patients with refractory disease. At the end of induction, ORR and CR rate were 35.9% and 29.7%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 22 months (range: 1 to 39 months), the estimated 2-year PFS and OS were 21% and 25%, respectively (Figure 1A and 1B), being significantly better in patients with relapsed disease (Figure 1C and 1D). In the multivariate analysis, status of lymphoma at study entry significantly influenced PFS (HR 0.45; 95% CI 0.25-0.82; p=0.009) and OS (HR 0.51; 95% CI 0.27-0.94; p=0.0031) independently from the IPI and the number of previous treatment lines. The most frequent adverse events (AE) (present in at least 20% of patients) were thrombocytopenia (67.2%), diarrhea (51.6%), neutropenia (46.9%), anemia (37.5%), fatigue (34.4%), nausea (29.7%) and paresthesia (20.3%). The most frequent grade 3-5 AE (present in at least 10% of patients) were thrombocytopenia (46.9%), neutropenia (35.9%), diarrhea (15.6%) and anemia (14.1%). Three patients presented a grade 5 AE, two of them related (aspergillosis and pneumonia, respectively) and one unrelated (heart failure). CONCLUSIONS The combination of ibrutinib with R-GEMOX-D as salvage therapy for patients with non-GCB DLBCL is associated with high response rates, especially in relapsed patients. The vast majority of refractory patients progress very early, so this regimen could be considered as a bridge to other consolidation therapies. Biological studies analyzing cell of origin by gene expression profiling, minimal residual disease and mutational spectrum are in progress. Disclosures Abrisqueta: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Giné:Janssen: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding. Grande:Janssen: Research Funding. Caballero:Roche: Other: travel; Gilead: Other: travel; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel; BMS: Other: travel; Takeda: Other: travel; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Martin Garcia-Sancho:Roche, Celgene, Janssen, Servier, Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene, Eusa Pharma, Gilead, iQuone, Kyowa Kirin, Roche, Morphosys: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Off-label use of a new combination in the context of a clinical trial. New combination (Ibrutinib + R-GEMOX)

Background: Previous studies showed that MRD- pts after transplant may have detectable monoclonal protein through IFx, creating confusion regarding their prognostication. That said, MRD assessment in these pts was not performed with next generation techniques nor or in later time points. Additional discordances have been identified between multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) and NGS, which were confirmed in recent analyses comparing NGF vs NGS. Aim: To characterize discordances between flow cytometry vs NGS and IFx through the investigation of immature B cells sharing the same B-cell receptor immunoglobulin (BcR IG) with MM cells. Methods: Progression-free survival (PFS) according to negative vs positive IFx was analyzed in 219 MRD- pts by MFC after transplant, enrolled in the GEM2000 and GEM2005MENOS65 trials. The same comparison was performed in 205 MRD- pts by NGF after consolidation in the GEM2012MENOS65 trial. MRD detection by NGS was compared to MFC or NGF in 140 and 104 cases, respectively. We performed NGS of BcR IG gene rearrangements (mean: 69,975 sequences) and WES (mean depth: 145x) in a total of 68 B cell samples isolated from the bone marrow (BM) of 7 MM MRD- pts by NGF after treatment (GEM2012MENOS65). These were intentionally selected to avoid contamination from MM plasma cells (PCs) during sorting of CD34 progenitors, B cell precursors, mature B cells and normal PCs. We investigated these populations for the presence of clonotypic BcR IG and somatic mutations detected in MM PCs sorted at diagnosis, using T cells as germline control. In another 10 untreated MM pts, we performed scRNA/BcRseq of total BM B cells and PCs (n=52,735), to investigate if the clonotypic BcR IG of MM PCs was detectable in other B cell stages defined by their molecular phenotype. Results: Among 219 MRD- pts by 4 color MFC after transplant, 76 (35%) showed positive IFx and identical PFS to those with negative IFx (medians of 63 vs 66 months, p=0.96). Similarly, 23/205 (11%) MRD- pts by NGF after consolidation showed positive IFx and identical PFS to those with negative IFx (4y rates of 87% vs 78.5%, p=0.35). Thus, albeit the higher sensitivity of NGF and the later time point (consolidation), approximately 1/10 MRD- pts by NGF continued showing positive IFx, and their outcome was as favorable as that of MRD- cases in CR. We then investigated discordances between flow cytometry and NGS. Among 35 MRD- pts by 4 color MFC, 21 (60%) were MRD+ by NGS, whereas 8/44 (18%) MRD- cases by NGF were MRD+ by NGS; only one of the latter 8 pts relapsed so far. Noteworthy, 9/29 MRD- pts by MFC or NGF showed MRD levels ≥10-4 by NGS, suggesting that other factors beyond sensitivity were accounting for the discordances between MRD assessed by MFC/NGF (in the PC compartment) vs NGS (in whole BM samples). NGS of BcR IG gene rearrangements in sorted BM cells from MRD- pts by NGF, uncovered the presence of MM clonotypes in normal PCs (4/7 pts) and in B cells (5/7 pts) at low frequencies (mean of 0.31% in both, range: 0.003% - 9.4%). These findings were confirmed by scRNA/BCRseq, which unveiled in 10/10 pts that clonotypic cells were confined mostly but not entirely within PC clusters. We next performed WES to investigate if genetic abnormalities present in MM PCs at diagnosis were detectable in the same BM cells sorted after treatment in MRD- pts. Surprisingly, 41/201 (20%) somatic mutations present in diagnostic MM PCs were detectable in CD34 progenitors (n=6/7), B-cell precursors (n=4/7), mature B cells (n=5/7) and phenotypically normal PCs (n=4/7). All somatic mutations shared by MM PCs and sorted BM normal cells were non-recurrent, and genes recurrently mutated in MM (ATM, DIS3, KRAS, LTB, MAX,) as well as copy number alterations (CNA) found in MM PCs, were undetectable in normal cells. Conclusions: Albeit more-sensitive NGF, 11% of MRD- pts continue showing positive IFx. This should not be regarded as a false-negative result, since these pts have similar outcome to those in CR and MRD-. Our findings also suggest that, at least in some pts, discordances between NGF and NGS could be attributed to immature clonotypic cells. However, these lack most somatic mutations and CNA found in MM PCs, and therefore cannot drive disease relapse. This would explain the favorable outcome of MRD- pts by NGF despite positive NGS. From a pathogenic standpoint, our study proposes that a mutated and clonally expanded lymphopoiesis precedes secondary driver mutations or CNA leading to the expansion of MM PCs. Disclosures García-Sanz: Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Honoraria; Gilead: Other: Research grants, Research Funding; IVS (Biomed 2-Euroclonality): Patents & Royalties: and other intellectual property; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses. Mateos:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Regeneron: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria. Chatzidimitriou:Janssen: Research Funding. San-Miguel:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Paiva:Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite: Consultancy; SkylineDx: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Adaptive: Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

The use of immunochemotherapy has improved the outcome of follicular lymphoma (FL). Recently, complete response at 30 months (CR30) has been suggested as a surrogate for progression-free survival. This study aimed to analyse the life expectancy of FL patients according to their status at 30 months from the start of treatment in comparison with the sex and age-matched Spanish general population (relative survival; RS). The training series comprised 263 patients consecutively diagnosed with FL in a 10-year period who needed therapy and were treated with rituximab-containing regimens. An independent cohort of 693 FL patients from the Grupo Español de Linfomas y Trasplante Autólogo de Médula Ósea (GELTAMO) group was used for validation. In the training cohort, 188 patients were in CR30, with a 10-year overall survival (OS) of 53% and 87% for non-CR30 and CR30 patients, respectively. Ten-year RS was 73% and 100%, showing no decrease in life expectancy for CR30 patients. Multivariate analysis indicated that the FL International Prognostic Index was the most important variable predicting OS in the CR30 group. The impact of CR30 status on RS was validated in the independent GELTAMO series. In conclusion, FL patients treated with immunochemotherapy who were in CR at 30 months showed similar survival to a sex- and age-matched Spanish general population.

The name of Pau Montesinos was inadvertently presented as Pau Montesinos Fernández in the original article.The original version of this article was revised: The name of Pau Montesinos was inadvertently presented as Pau Montesinos Fernández.

Background: The use of immunochemotherapy has substantially increased the outcome of patients with follicular lymphoma (FL). Nowadays, life expectancy for those reaching a durable response is excellent. Recently, complete response at 30 months (CR30) has been suggested as a surrogate for progression-free survival. The aim of this study was to analyze the life expectancy of FL patients according to their status at 30 months from the start of treatment in comparison with the sex and age-matched Spanish general population (relative survival; RS). Methods: 263 patients consecutively diagnosed with FL in a 10-year period, needing therapy and treated with rituximab-containing regimens, constituted the training series. An independent cohort of 693 FL patients from the GELTAMO group was used for validation. Findings: In the training cohort, 188 patients (71%) were in complete response at 30 months, with a 10-year overall survival of 53% and 87% for non-CR30 and CR30 patients, respectively. Ten-year RS was 73% and 100%, showing no decrease in life expectancy for CR30 patients. Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI), beta2-microglobulin and response to induction, but not maintenance therapy or PET/CT assessment after induction, predicted RS in the CR30 patients group. FLIPI was the most important variable predicting overall survival in the CR30 group in the multivariate analysis. The impact of CR30 status on RS was validated in the independent GELTAMO series. Interpretation: Follicular lymphoma patients treated with immunochemotherapy who were in complete remission at 30 months showed similar survival to that of the sex- and age-matched Spanish general population. Funding: Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministerio de Salud, Espana, Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad, Espana, CIBERONC, the program "Fellowship de Gilead Sciences", Spanish Group of Lymphoma and Bone Marrow Transplantation (GELTAMO). Declaration of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Ethical Approval: All the patients gave informed consent to participate in the study according to the declaration of Helsinki and the ethical standards of the Ethic Committee of the Hospital Clinic de Barcelona and in each participating centre in accordance with institutional standards.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and checkpoint blockade therapy are immune-based salvage therapies for Hodgkin’s lymphoma; however, the use of programmed death 1 blocking agents in the allogeneic stem cell transplantation setting could augment the incidence of steroid refractory graft-versus-host disease. Few studies suggest that that nivolumab is safe in patients previously treated with an allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Likewise, there are very limited data on the use of nivolumab before allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Here, we report a case of fatal graft-versus-host disease in a patient who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation 26 days after the last administration of nivolumab. Careful monitoring and close clinical assessment of atypical presentation for graft-versus-host disease in these patients, interval of time from nivolumab administration to allogeneic stem cell transplantation, drug dosage adjustments or more effective allo prophilaxys should been evaluated in prospective clinical trial.

High-dose chemotherapy supported by autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT/ASCT) has contributed to modify the natural history of follicular lymphoma (FL); however, an overall survival (OS) benefit has been demonstrated at relapse only after a rituximab-free chemotherapy regimen. A total of 655 patients with FL were reported to the Spanish GELTAMO (Grupo Espafiol de Linfomas y Trasplantes de Medula Osea) registry and underwent first ASCT between 1989 and 2007. A total of 203 patients underwent ASCT in first complete response (CR1), 174 in second complete response (CR2), 28 in third complete response (CR3), 140 in first partial response (PR1), 81 in subsequent PR, and 29 with resistant/refractory disease; 184 patients received rituximab before ASCT. With a median follow-up of 12 years from ASCT, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 9.7 and 21.3 years, respectively. Actuarial 12-year PFS and OS were 63% (95% confidence interval [CI], 58%-68%) and 73% (95% CI, 68%-78%), respectively, for patients in CR (with a plateau in the curve beyond 15.9 years), 25% (95% CI, 19%-28%) and 49% (95% CI 42%-56%), respectively, for patients in PR, and 23% (95% CI, 8%-48%) and 28% (95% CI, 9%-45%), respectively, for patients with resistant/refractory disease = 2 or PR >= 2 who had received rituximab before ASCT (n = 90), 9-year PFS and OS were 61% (95% CI, 51%-73%) and 75% (95% CI, 65%-80%), respectively, with no relapses occurring beyond 5.1 years after ASCT. The cumulative incidence of second malignancies in the global series was 6.7% at 5 years and 12.8% at 10 years. This analysis strongly suggests that ASCT is a potentially curative option for eligible patients with FL. In the setting of relapse, it is of especial interest in pretransplantation rituximab-sensitive patients with FL. (C) 2017 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Summary The diagnostic criteria for follicular lymphoma (FL) transformation vary among the largest series, which commonly exclude histologically-documented transformation (HT) mandatorily. The aims of this retrospective observational multicentre study by the Spanish Grupo Espanol de Linfoma y Transplante Autologo de Medula Osea, which recruited 1734 patients (800 males/934 females; median age 59 years), diagnosed with FL grades 1–3A, were, (i) the cumulative incidence of HT (CI-HT); (ii) risk factors associated with HT; and (iii) the role of treatment and response on survival following transformation (SFT). With a median follow-up of 6·2 years, 106 patients developed HT. Ten-year CI-HT was 8%. Considering these 106 patients who developed HT, median time to transformation was 2·5 years. High-risk FL International Prognostic Index [Hazard ratio (HR) 2·6, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1·5–4·5] and non-response to first-line therapy (HR 2·9, 95% CI: 1·3–6·8) were associated with HT. Seventy out of the 106 patients died (5-year SFT, 26%). Response to HT first-line therapy (HR 5·3, 95% CI: 2·4–12·0), autologous stem cell transplantation (HR 3·9, 95% CI: 1·5–10·1), and revised International Prognostic Index (HR 2·2, 95% CI: 1·1–4·2) were significantly associated with SFT. Response to treatment and HT were the variables most significantly associated with survival in the rituximab era. Better therapies are needed to improve response. Inclusion of HT in clinical trials with new agents is mandatory.

Guidelines recommend autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) consolidation in first complete or partial response after regimens including rituximab (R) and high-dose AraC (HDAC), but its use beyond that response is questioned. We present a retrospective analysis of 268 patients with MCL who received ASCT. With a median follow-up for survival patients of 54 months, progression-free survival and overall survival for the whole series were 38 and 74 months, respectively, and for patients transplanted in first CR 49 and 97 months, respectively. Patients without CR before transplant were analyzed separately, those who achieved CR after transplantation had better PFS (48 vs 0.03 months, p

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Chemosensitization using plerixafor combined with FLAG-IDA (PLERIFLAG regimen) showed promising results (48% CR/CRi) in a phase 2 trial for primary refractory and early relapsed (duration of first CR Patients: Of the 540 patients in the data base we analysed 300 patients relapsed or resistant to induction therapy, which had all data available. 241 patients were treated with FLAG-IDA, 41 with FLAGO-Ida, and 42 with PLERIFLAG. Differences between treatment cohorts were tested using Fisher exact test. Treatment cohorts (PLERIFLAG vs FLAG-IDA vs FLAGO-IDA) were similar in Age (p=0.5), Sex (p=0.5), FLT3-ITD mutated (p=0.5), EPI/HOVON cytogenetics score (p=0.5) and previous myelodisplasia (p=0.2). The three cohorts differed in time to relapse (p=0.001), previous stem cell transplantation (0.001), HOVON score (p=0.03) and SALFLAGE score (0.001). RESULTS There were no differences in terms of CR+CRi between the three types of treatment adjusted by Hovon risk score (Pleriflag: 48%, FLAG-IDA: 50% or FLAGO-IDA: 58%; Chrochan Maentel-Haenszel test, p=0.466) or SALFLAGE score (Chrochan-Maentel-Haenszel test, p=0.23). More patients were allografted in the PLERIFLAG (61%) group even not achieving CR/Cri, as compared to FLAG-IDA (38%) or FLAGO-Ida (61% vs 38% vs. 18%, p=0.0001). To compare PLERIFLAG against the other two types of salvage treatment we performed a Propensity Score in a proportion 1:3. We adjust variables like age, previous allogeneic transplant, time to relapse (refractory, 12 months), karyotype using MRC, and FLT3-ITD status. Karyotype risk was considered by HOVON criteria (inv16, t(8;21) vs others), and SALFLAGE (inv 16, intermediate risk, and unfavourable risk by MRC risk plus t(8;21)). The propensity score analyses showed that Compared to FLAG-IDA, PLERIFLAG was associated to increased survival (median OS 10.56 months vs. 5.6, p=0.03), but not improved EFS (2.83 months vs 1.41 months, p=0.8). The benefit in OS but not in EFS could be explained in part by frequent use of Allo SCT in patients who had not achieve CR/CRi in the PLERIFLAG cohort. In conclusion, our historical control study show that PLERIFLAG regimen is an acceptable therapeutic option for first relapsed/refractory adult AML patients. Disclosures Esteve: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Salamero:Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Daichii Sankyo: Honoraria. Perez Encinas:CELGENE: Consultancy; JANSSEN: Consultancy; GILEAD SCIENCES: Research Funding. Montesinos:Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Research support, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Research support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Research support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Research support, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Research support; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Research support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Research support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Introduction: To discriminate different outcomes among patients in CR, the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG )introduced more stringent CR (sCR) criteria by adding to the pre-existing CR parameters the requirement of a normal free-light chain ratio (sFLCr) plus the absence of clonal plasma cells (PCs) in bone marrow (BM) by immunohistochemistry (IHC). In 2011,the low-sensitivity cytometrycriteria were included as alternative methodology to IHC to define sCR. Aim: To validate the preliminary data of our previous study (Blood 2015. 126:858-62) regarding the lack of influence of an abnormal sFLCr in the outcome of MM patients, through the analysis of a more extensiveseries of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients in CR or sCR. Patients and Methods: This study is based on 459 NDMM patients who were transplant candidates and enrolled in the GEM2012MENOS65phase 3trial;evaluable patients were enrolled in a subsequent maintenance trial (NCT02406144).CR and sCR was defined according to the IMWG criteria. Agreeing to the protocol, patients with 1.65 if the patient was κ). BM aspirates were assessed for morphological enumeration of PCs and monitoring of minimal residual disease (MRD) using next-generation flow (NGF) according toEuroFlow SOPs. The median limit of detection was of 3x10-6. We classified as sCR all patients in CR with normal sFLCr and absence of clonal PCs by NGF with a reduced threshold of sensitivity to 10-4.The median follow-up was 40 months. Results: After ASCT,392 patients were evaluable for response; 239 (61%) reached ≥CR. Data from sFLCr and MRD was available in 225 and 221 patients, respectively. In 153 out of a total of 203 (74%) patients in CR in which complete information about FLC and MRD was available were categorized as sCR. The remaining 55 patients were consider in CR because of failure to accomplish 1 of the 2 criteria: abnormal sFLCr (n=49) or MRD+veby low sensitivity flow (n=11); 5patientsshared both criteria.In a landmark from ASCT, with a follow up of 27 months, sCRdidn't show significantly differences inPFS (2 years-PFS 90% vs 83%; P=.2) neither in OS (2 years-OS 96% vs 98%; P=.6) as compared to CR patients.Interestingly, patients with abnormal (n=51) vs normal (n=174) sFLCr showed superimposable PFS (2 years-PFS 86% vs 88%; P=.6) and OS (2 years-OS 95% vs 100%; P=.2).By contrast, in the 11 patients (out of the 221, 5%) with persistent MRD (>10-4) the PFS was significantly poorer as compared with MRD-ve cases (2-yearsPFS 91% vs48%; P=.001)but the OS was similar (2 years-OS 98% vs 96%; P=.3).As validation, we reproduced the analysis in the consolidation-2 end-point (figure 1), where375patients were evaluable for response assessment,267 of them (71%) reached ≥CR. Once again, in the landmark analysis, sCR didn't show significantly differences in PFS with respect to CR patients (2 years-PFS 88% vs 84%; P=.2) neither in OS (2 years-PFS 96% vs 90%; P=.3); moreover, patients with abnormal (n=55) vs normal (n=195) sFLCr showed superimposable PFS (2 years-PFS 84% vs 87%; P=.4) and OS (2 years-OS 89% vs 96%; P=.2).In the MRD analysis, patients with persistent MRD, had significantly inferior PFS (2-years PFS 87% vs 72%; P=.04 for >10-4 MRDsensitivity). If we increase the sensitivity of the MRD to 10-6, the differences in PFS at 2 years are more evident (2 years-PFS 94% vs 67%; P10-6 sensitivity). Conclusion: These results confirm our previous findings based on GEM05menos65/ GEM10mas65 clinical trials, indicating that for MM patients stringent CR criteria does not predict a different outcome as compared to standard CR. Specifically, the sFLCr doesn't identify patients in CR at distinct risk. If this essential criterion in the definition of sCR lacks connotations for the prognosis, is it not justified to maintain a response category whose real significance depends on the combination of the traditional CR criteria with a negative MRD status based on very low (IHC) or low resolution ( Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Martinez Lopez: Janssen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Rosinol:Janssen, Celgene, Amgen, Takeda: Honoraria. Puig:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Oriol:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Ocio:Pharmamar: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Array Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. De La Rubia:Ablynx: Consultancy, Other: Member of Advisory Board. Rios:Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, and Takeda: Consultancy. Mateos:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. San-Miguel:Sanofi: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; MSD: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Brystol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bladé:Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Lahuerta:Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Background:High dose therapy supported by autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT/ASCT) has been a treatment frequently indicated in follicular lymphoma (FL) patients and has contributed to modify the natural history of the disease. Secondary neoplasia is one of the concerns after HDT/ASCT, although its incidence after transplant-free treatments is considerable (RummelM et al. Lancet Oncol 2016; Sacchi S et al. Haematologica 2008). The high incidence of secondary neoplasia in some of the studies, together with the lack of OS advantage in transplanted patients compared to those treated with conventional Chemo/R, has led to abandon HDT/ASCT by many groups. However, its incidence is very variable among studies due in part to cohort different in terms of age, pre-ASCT treatments, used of TBI-based or TBI-free conditioning regimen or length of follow-up. Methods:The Incidence of secondary neoplasia, the factors associated with its development and the survival of 655 FL patients reported to the Spanish GELTAMO registry and intensified with HDT/ASCT between 1989 and 2007 with a median follow-up of 12.3 years from HDT/ASCT and 14.5 years from diagnosis were analyzed. Baseline characteristics and therapeutic-related data are listed in the table. Standardized Incidence Ratios (SIR) were calculated to assess the risk of a second malignancy by dividing the number of observed second malignancies with the number of expected sex matched incidence using the 2008 crudes rates in the Spanish population (J Farley et al. EJC 2013). Data were updated with a cut-off date of 31 June 2016. Results:Median OS were 21.3 years from HDT/ASCT and 22.6 years from the time of FL diagnosis. A total of 83 patients (12.75%) developed 85 second malignancies. There were 45 cases of solid tumors (51%), including 8 skin cancers; 34 cases of Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndromes (AML/MDS) (40%); 2 Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL), 1 chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), 1 Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and 2 cases of other cancers. The accumulated incidence at 5, 10 and 15 years were 6.7%, 12% and 17.8%, respectively. The incidence for solid tumors and AML/SMD were 2.1%, 4.1%, 9.5% and 3.1%,6.4% and 8,1% at 5, 10 and 15 years, respectively. Median time from HDT/AST to the diagnosis of the second malignancy was 5.5 years (IQR 3.2-9.6). Solid tumors and AML/SMD were documented with a median time of occurrence since HDT/ASCT 7.7 years (IQR 3.2-9.9) and 4.2 years (IQR 1.7-7.3), respectively. The SIR for second neoplasia was 2.8 (CI 95%: 2.6-2.9) and only 1.4 (CI 95% 1.3-16) in the case of solid tumors. Only male sex (P=.006) and the use of anthracycline at first line therapy in the case of solid tumors (P=.02) were associated with an increased number of second neoplasia. Older age and a status of disease before HDT/ASCT different to complete response showed a tendency. There were no differences according to the use of fludarabine or rituximab previously to HDT/ASCT, number of therapy lines before HDT/ASCT, time from diagnosis to HDT/ASCT or conditioning regimen. Median OS for patients with second neoplasia is 12 years from the time of FL diagnosis, 9.4 years from ASCT (fig 2)[14.5 y. for solid tumors and 8 y. for sMDS/sAML (P=.01)] and 1.5 years from the time of diagnosis of second neoplasia [2.3 y. for solid tumors and 1.25 y. for sMDS/sAML (P=.01)], respectively Conclusion: This very long follow-up study, that includes patients from the rituximab era, indicates that FL patients undergoing an ASCT are at an increased risk of developing a 2nd malignancy, especially AML-MDS. However, the incidence is not higher than the reported in other series without transplantation. Only male sex and the use of anthracyclines were associated with an increased risk of 2nd neoplasia. Given the favorable survival obtained by ASCT in FL, the risk of secondary neoplasia shouldn't preclude its application. However, once a neoplasia is diagnosed the prognosis is dismal. Thus, a carefully selection of patients candidates to HDT/ASCT is necessary. Table Table. Figure Figure. Disclosures Lopez-Jimenez: Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Velgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MundiPharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Martín:Sevier: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria.

Introduction: At present, determining OS (Overall Survival) remains the gold standard in clinical trial endpoints which evaluate the role of ASCT in FL. However, in the context of a disease characterized by very long median survivals with a continuous pattern of relapse, and still more with the advent of novel treatments, OS assessments seem elusive. In fact, PFS (Progression Free Survival) is the standard endpoint for new drug approvals in first-line FL, and some other earlier endpoints such 2-year PFS (Casulo et al , JCO 2015) or CR30 (Sargent, 2015) have been recently proposed as potential surrogates and as alternatives to PFS or OS as primary end-points in FL patients treated with 1st line chemoinmunoterapy. Objective: To assess if 2-year PFS and CR30 are feasible surrogates of OS in the setting of a very long follow-up series of FL patients treated with ASCT. Material and Methods: A total of 626 chemosensitive FL patients (mean age 47 years, male 49%) reported to the Spanish GELTAMO registry and intensified with ASCT between 1989 and 2007 were analyzed. The status of the disease at the moment of ASCT was either in 1st response [203 in 1st CR, 43% of them needing more than one therapy line to reach the CR, and 140 in 1st Partial Response (PR)] or in response after salvage therapy (174 in 2nd CR, 28 in 3rd CR and 81 in 2nd or 3rd PR). In 615 patients the status of the disease was evaluable after ASCT: 569 cases (92%) in CR, 27 cases (4%) in PR and 19 cases (3%) progressed or died. To assess 2-year PFS, two groups were defined: patients with progression of disease (POD) within 2 years from ASCT (early POD) and patients without progression within 2 years from ASCT. Cox model analysis was used to evaluate the association between early POD and OS from a risk - defining event, which is survival from time of POD for early progressors or from 2 years after ASCT for the reference group (Casulo et al, JCO 2015.Appendix). To asses CR30, two groups were defined: patients with and patients without CR at 30 months from ASCT. Cox model analysis was used to evaluate the association between being or not in CR at 30 months from ASCT. Results: Median follow-up is 12.2 years from ASCT and 14.2 years from diagnosis. Of the assessable patients, 31% were in the high-risk FLIPI group and 40% in the high-risk FLIPI 2 group. 30% of patients received rituximab prior to ASCT. Globally median PFS and median OS are 11 and 21 years, respectively. Patients transplanted in PR (n=221; 35%) had a worse OS than those transplanted in CR (n=405, 65%): HR 2.45 (95% CI, 2.2-2.7; P10-5), fig. 3. Conclusion: 2-year PFS and CR30 could be used as subrogates for OS and as primary end points, not only in FL patients treated with 1st line chemoinmunoterapy, but also in FL intensified with an ASCT. To our knowledge this is the first study to establish that early relapse after ASCT is predictive of poor survival in FL patients; in both, patients treated or not with rituximab previously to the ASCT. This finding is even more evident in patients transplanted in CR. Likewise, best response achieved before ASCT is a robust prognostic factor for OS in FL patients. Figure 1. Figure 1. Figure 2. Figure 2. Figure 3. Figure 3. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Background: Patients with high-risk FL intensified with HDT/ASCT may achieve prolonged remissions. The best timing for the procedure remains controversial. Patients who are transplanted in first response show a major Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Event Free Survival (EFS) advantage compared to those treated with conventional chemotherapy. Nevertheless, no randomized studies have yet shown an overall survival (OS) benefit. Populational-based and very long-term retrospective analysis are indispensable tools to assess the actual impact on outcome of therapeutic interventions in FL. With this assumption we performed a retrospective analysis in FL patients undergoing HDT/ASCT intensification included in the GELTAMO Spanish Group Registry. Objectives: The overall outcome as well as the clinical evolution according to the disease status at transplant, to the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI and FLIPI II) and to the previous exposure to Rituximab. Series characteristics: Six hundred and sixty six patients with FL (mean age 47 years, male 49%) undergoing HDT/ASCT between 1989 and 2007 were reported to the GELTAMO registry. Patients with histological transformation at the time of HDT/ASCT, those undergoing a 2nd transplant and those with a follow-up of less than 7 years were excluded. Thus, 640 patients were included in the analysis. Median follow-up was 12.2 years from HDT/ASCT and 14.2 years from diagnosis. Follow-up from HDT/ASCT was over 16 years for 153 patients (3rd quartile). The median time from diagnosis to HDT/ASCT was 1.8 years. Two hundred and forty-seven patients (38%) never achieved a complete remission (CR) before HDT/ASCT. Two hundred patients (31%) received HDT/ASCT after achievement of first CR (CR1), 43% of them requiring more than one chemotherapy line to achieve CR1; 26% in 2nd CR, 5% in 3rd CR, 21% in 1st partial response (PR), 12% in chemosensitive recurrence, and 5% with active disease. Of the 321 patients assessable for the FLIPI, 33% had a low-risk (LR), 36% an intermediate-risk (IR), and 45% a high-risk (HR) score; and of the 305 patients assessable for the FLIPI II, 22% had a LR, 38% an IR and 40% a HR. Of the 127 patients in CR1 assessable for the FLIPI, 28% had a LR, 40% an IR, and 32% a HR; of the 115 patient assessable for FLIPI II, 14% had a LR, 46% an IR, and 40 % a HR. One third of patients received Rituximab prior to transplant. Results: Median PFS and OS were 9.4 and 21.3 years, respectively. Patients transplanted in CR1 achieved significantly better final PFS (68%) and OS (73%), than those transplanted in 2nd CR (median PFS 110 months (mo.) and final OS 58%; P Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge there is no study on the therapeutic impact in the evolution of LF offering such a long follow-up. HDT/ASCT is a good option of consolidation for those patients who achieve a good quality of response with chemotherapy. The finding of a plateau beyond 15.9 years for patients transplanted in first remission suggests that a significant number of patients from this group may never relapse and could be cured, even those with poor initial features. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.