Jorge E. González, L. Méndez-Acuña, A. Radl, M V Di Tomaso, Wilner Martínez-López, J.C. De Luca, Gabriel E. Pantelias, P. Valdivia, M. Stuck Oliveira, M. Espinoza, T. Mandina, Joan Francesc Barquinero, C. Guerrero-Carbajal, Ana I. Lamadrid, Ivonne Romero, M. R. Taja, N. Oliveros, Oriol Gasquez Garcia, Roser Puig, Analia Isabel Seoane, M. B. Vallerga, M. Di Giorgio, Laurence Roy, C. Arceo Maldonado, Georgia I. Terzoudi, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Nucleares (ININ), Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Nucleares, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos (UNMSM), Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), and International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA
The bottleneck in data acquisition during biological dosimetry based on a dicentric assay is the need to score dicentrics in a large number of lymphocytes. One way to increase the capacity of a given laboratory is to use the ability of skilled operators from other laboratories. This can be done using image analysis systems and distributing images all around the world. Two exercises were conducted to test the efficiency of such an approach involving 10 laboratories. During the first exercise (E1), the participant laboratories analysed the same images derived from cells exposed to 0.5 and 3 Gy; 100 images were sent to all participants for both doses. Whatever the dose, only about half of the cells were complete with well-spread metaphases suitable for analysis. A coefficient of variation (CV) on the standard deviation of ̃15 % was obtained for both doses. The trueness was better for 3 Gy (0.6 %) than for 0.5 Gy (37.8 %). The number of estimated doses classified as satisfactory according to the z-score was 3 at 0.5 Gy and 8 at 3 Gy for 10 dose estimations. In the second exercise, an emergency situation was tested, each laboratory was required to score a different set of 50 images in 2 d extracted from 500 downloaded images derived from cells exposed to 0.5 Gy. Then the remaining 450 images had to be scored within a week. Using 50 different images, the CVon the estimated doses (79.2 %) was not as good as in E1, probably associated to a lower number of cells analysed (50 vs. 100) or from the fact that laboratories analysed a different set of images. The trueness for the dose was better after scoring 500 cells (22.5 %) than after 50 cells (26.8 %). For the 10 dose estimations, the number of doses classified as satisfactory according to the z-score was 9, for both 50 and 500 cells. Overall, the results obtained support the feasibility of networking using electronically transmitted images. However, before its implementation some issues should be elucidated, such as the number and resolution of the images to be sent, and the harmonisation of the scoring criteria. Additionally, a global website able to be used for the different regional networks, like Share Points, will be desirable to facilitate worldwide communication. Fil: García, O.. Centro de Protección e Higiene de las Radiaciones; Cuba Fil: Di Giorgio, Marina. Autoridad Regulatoria Nuclear. Gerencia Apoyo Científico Técnico; Argentina Fil: Vallerga, María Belén. Autoridad Regulatoria Nuclear. Gerencia Apoyo Científico Técnico; Argentina Fil: Radl, Analía. Autoridad Regulatoria Nuclear. Gerencia Apoyo Científico Técnico; Argentina Fil: Taja, María Rosa. Autoridad Regulatoria Nuclear. Gerencia Apoyo Científico Técnico; Argentina Fil: Seoane, Analia Isabel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico CONICET- La Plata. Instituto de Genética Veterinaria "Ing. Fernando Noel Dulout". Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Instituto de Genética Veterinaria; Argentina Fil: de Luca, Julio Cesar. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico CONICET- La Plata. Instituto de Genética Veterinaria "Ing. Fernando Noel Dulout". Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Instituto de Genética Veterinaria; Argentina Fil: Stuck Oliveira, Mónica. Instituto de Radioprotección y Dosimetría; Brasil Fil: Valdivia, Patricia. Comision Chilena de Energia Nuclear; Chile Fil: Lamadrid, Ana Ilsa. Centro de Proteccion E Higiene de Las Radiaciones; Cuba Fil: González, Jorge Ernesto. Centro de Proteccion E Higiene de Las Radiaciones; Cuba Fil: Romero, I.. Centro de Proteccion E Higiene de Las Radiaciones; Cuba Fil: Mandina, Tania. Centro de Proteccion E Higiene de Las Radiaciones; Cuba Fil: Pantelias, G.. National Center For Scientific Research ‘demokritos’; Grecia Fil: Terzoudi, G.. National Center For Scientific Research ‘demokritos’; Grecia Fil: Guerrero Carbajal, Citlalo. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Nucleares; México Fil: Arceo Maldonado, Carolina. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Nucleares; México Fil: Espinoza, Marco. Instituto Peruano de Energia Nuclear; Perú Fil: Oliveros, Nilda. Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos; Perú Fil: Martinez Lopez, Wilner. Instituto Investigaciones Biologicas Clemente Estable; Uruguay Fil: Di Tomasso, Maria Vittoria. Instituto Investigaciones Biologicas Clemente Estable; Uruguay Fil: Mendez, Leticia Jesica. Instituto Investigaciones Biologicas Clemente Estable; Uruguay Fil: Puig, Nora Raquel. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; España Fil: Roy, Laurence. Institut de Radioprotection Et de Surete Nucleaire; Francia Fil: Barquinero, J.F.. Institut de Radioprotection Et de Surete Nucleaire; Francia