Search

Objective To assess the role of Dau c 1 in three patients with carrot induced asthma. Material and methods Patient 1 had asthma when handling raw carrots. Sensitization to pollens wasn’t detected. Patient 2 had rhinoconjunctivitis due to grass and olive pollen allergy. She had asthma when handling raw carrots. Patient 3 was diagnosed of rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma due to allergic sensitization to mites, several pollens and cat. She had asthma due to raw carrot ingestion and inhalation. IgE immunobot analysis and ELISA inhibition assay were used to investigate the allergens and specific antibodies. Results IgE Immunoblot Analysis: Dau c 1 from carrot extract and the recombinant rDau c 1 were recognized by IgE from patients 1 and 2. Band of Bet v 1 in birch pollen extract wasn’t recognized. Patient 3 didn’t recognize any of these allergens. Specific IgE to rDau c 1 was measured by ELISA. Specific IgE ELISA-inhibition with carrot as solid phase howed an intermediate inhibition (30 %) between carrot and rDau c 1 in patient 1; and a considerable inhibition (nearly 100 %) between carrot and rDau c 1 in patient 2. No inhibition was found in patient 3. Specific IgE ELISA inhibition between r Dau c 1 and r Bet v 1 , employing r Dau c 1 as solid phase was made in patients 1 and 2. Bet v 1 showed less than 40 % of inhibition of r Dau c 1 in patient 1; and an intermediate inhibition (> 40 %) between r Bet v 1 and r Dau c 1 in patient 2. Conclusions Airborne carrot allergens are able to sensitize without the implication of a previous pollen allergy. Dau c 1 was the main allergen in patient 2. In patient 1, there was a band of 30 kd that looks like the predominant allergen. Patients 1 and 2 were sensitized directly from carrot allergens. In patient 3, Dau c 1 isn’t related to the carrot allergy. Allergy to carrot in patient 3 seems to be related to her allergy to different pollens; however, it wasn’t related to birch pollen. Mediterranean countries didn’t show the same patterns of food-related pollen allergy than Nordic countries.

The ingestion of lupine seed flour has been reported as a cause of allergic reactions. There is some evidence of its allergenic potential after inhalation. An 8-year-old asthmatic child, who was allergic to peanut, was studied in our clinic with the suspicion of an adverse drug reaction due to salbutamol. He suffered an asthma attack while playing with his brother, who had been eating lupine seed as snack; surprisingly, the asthma attack worsened with salbutamol. The skin tests showed a positive result with Lupinus albus extract, peanut, garbanzo bean, navy bean, pea, green bean, lentil, soy, Olea europea pollen, grass pollen and Plantago lanceolata pollen. The prick-by-prick tests both from dried seeds and those preserved in salt and water were strongly positive. Serum specific IgE antibodies were positive to Lupine albus (1.43 kU/l), peanut (4.32 kU/l), soy (2.15 kU/l), lentil (3.12 kU/l) and garbanzo (0.7 kU/l). After informed consent salbutamol was well tolerated but the patient had asthma in 5 min of manipulation of the lupine seeds. In our case, reactivity with other legumes was also demonstrated, but only peanut allergy was relevant because boiled legumes were tolerated. It is also notorious that anamnesis is so important to assess the true etiological agents of asthma.

Immune abnormalities have been found in many patients receiving anti-epileptic drugs. However, the effects of carbamazepine are still conflicting. We report the case of a 31-year-old woman who began carbamazepine treatment because of idiopathic epilepsy of adulthood. After three years of treatment she developed arthralgias and malaise. Complete immunologic evaluation showed a total absence of immunoglobulin M with decreased levels of immunoglobulin A, positive antinuclear antibodies and monoclonal paraproteinemia type IgG-kappa. The possibility of B cell lymphoma or myeloma was ruled out. Skin testing was negative. Bone marrow examination was normal. After carbamazepine discontinuation, levels of IgA and IgM increased until reaching normal values over 3 years. The monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance also disappeared over this period. During this period of immunodeficiency, the patient did not complain of any infectious complications.

Carboplatin (CP) hypersensitivity reactions have been reported in nearly 12 % of patients treated with this drug. The pathophysiologic mechanisms of these reactions have not been entirely elucidated. Various hypotheses are under discussion. CP hypersensitivity reactions could be IgE-mediated, caused by low-molecular platinum compounds acting as haptens. Platinum salts are also able to release histamine from basophils and mast cells, and some events seem to be non-immune-mediated direct histamine release. We report a case of CP tolerance induction in a 65-year-old man. During the third course of CP he experienced an anaphylactic reaction. Skin testing was negative. Suspecting the possibility of an anaphylactoid reaction due to histamine release, we developed a protocol to induce tolerance. Pre-medication with corticosteroid and antihistaminic was performed before intravenous CP infusion. The bag with CP was first infused 60 ml/h for 30 minutes; the infusion was well tolerated and infusion was continued at 100 ml/h for the next 60 minutes and thereafter at 120 ml/h until the bag was finished. Following this "desensitization", monthly courses of CP using the same protocol have been well tolerated.

Food proteins can sensitize the infants via different sources. A 5-month-old boy suffered three episodes of generalized urticaria 20 min after the ingestion of a fruit purée containing apple, banana and orange. Skin testing showed positive results to banana and chestnut. Other tests were negative. The value of specific immunoglobulin E (Pharmacia CAP-FEIA, Uppsala, Sweden) to banana was 58 KU/l, to orange was 9.7 KU/l, to chestnut was 5.6 KU/l and to latex was 1.6 KU/l. Orange, apple and latex products were well tolerated. He never had eaten chestnut. The parents rejected a banana challenge test. The route of sensitization in our case might be via placenta, breast-milk, and inadvertent oral intake of food or even via inhalation. An early frequent exposure to banana allergens was considered a possibility factor for the development of banana sensitization. We found that the banana consumption during pregnancy and lactation by the mother of our patient was greater than usual. It is not frequent to find so high levels of sensitization to any fruit in first year of life. In our case, latex, chestnut and orange sensitizations did not seem to be clinically relevant. However, latex and foods known to cross-react with banana antigens should be given to banana-sensitive individuals with great caution.