Search

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive breast cancer subtype and has the highest rate of recurrence. The predominant standard of care for advanced TNBC is systemic chemotherapy with or without immunotherapy, however responses are typically short-lived. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop more effective treatments. PI3K pathway components represent plausible therapeutic targets, as approximately 40% of TNBCs have PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN alterations. However, unlike hormone receptor-positive tumors, it is still unclear if or how PI3K pathway inhibitors will be effective in triple-negative disease. Here we identify a promising AKT inhibitor-based therapeutic combination for TNBC. Specifically, we show that AKT inhibitors potently synergize with agents that suppress the histone methyltransferase, EZH2, and promote robust tumor regression in multiple TNBC models in vivo. AKT and EZH2 inhibitors exert these effects by first cooperatively driving basal-like TNBC cells into a more differentiated, luminal-like state, which cannot be effectively induced by either agent alone. More importantly, once differentiated, these agents kill TNBCs by hijacking signals that normally drive mammary gland involution. Together these findings identify a promising therapeutic strategy for this highly aggressive tumor type and illustrate how deregulated epigenetic enzymes can insulate tumors from oncogenic vulnerabilities. These studies also reveal how developmental tissue-specific cell death pathways may be co-opted for therapeutic benefit. Citation Format: Amy Schade, Naiara Perurena, Marina Watanabe, Carrie L. Rodriguez, Patrick Loi, Natalie Pilla, Rachel A. Davis, Kaia Mattioli, Dongxi Xiang, Jason J. Zoeller, Zhe Li, Ana C. Garrido-Castro, Sara Tolaney, Karen Cichowski. AKT and EZH2 inhibitors kill TNBCs by hijacking mechanisms of involution [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-08-11.

Background: The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens has been shown to significantly improve outcomes in patients with triple negative breast cancer and is being investigated for high-risk hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor-2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer. Preclinical evidence suggests radiation therapy (RT) can stimulate intra-tumoral T cell infiltration and enhance the expression and immune detection of tumor-specific neoantigens. This phase II pilot randomized study (NCT04443348) aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of two different doses of preoperative primary tumor RT boost when combined with neoadjuvant pembrolizumab, then followed by standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Dual co-primary endpoints include determining the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in the non-irradiated and pathologically confirmed metastatic axillary lymph node(s) in each treatment arm and quantifying tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes in on-treatment (C1D14) tumor biopsies. We hypothesize that high-dose RT will increase the proportion of tumors with high T cell infiltration (i.e., top quartile) from 25% to 55%. Secondary endpoints include measuring residual cancer burden, evaluating tolerability of the regimen, and assessing quality of life. Exploratory endpoints include evaluation of treatment-associated changes in the tumor immune microenvironment, circulating immune cell analyses, and circulating tumor DNA kinetics. Methods: The study plans to enroll 128 participants with either triple negative (n=80) or high-risk HR=/HER2- (n=48) breast cancer who will be randomized to receive no, low (9 Gy), or high (24 Gy) dose of preoperative RT boost, after which 24 participants of either breast cancer subtype will be enrolled to an exploratory high dose proton therapy boost cohort. The eligibility criteria include patients who have biopsy-proven, axillary lymph node-positive breast cancer that is either triple negative (defined as ER< 10%, PR< 10%, and HER2-negative) or high-risk HR+/HER2- (grade III or having a high-risk genomic assay score). Study treatment is given in 6-week cycles, with 400 mg Pembrolizumab given on day 1 of each cycle. For those participants randomized to receive a preoperative RT boost, treatment is delivered in 3 fractions (3 × 3 Gy or 3 × 8 Gy) over consecutive business days, where one of the fractions is given on the same day as C1D1 Pembrolizumab. Standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy begins on C1D15 with paclitaxel (plus carboplatin for triple negative) administered weekly for 12 weeks, and then starting on C3D15, dose-dense doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide is administered every 2 weeks for 8 weeks. Following neoadjuvant treatment, participants will receive standard breast surgery (including removal of the pathologically confirmed metastatic lymph node) followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab, radiation therapy, and standard-of-care systemic therapy as clinically indicated. Tissue samples from the primary tumor and biopsy-proven lymph node are taken at baseline, C1D14, and at the time of surgery. There are eleven blood collection timepoints throughout the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. Participants will be followed for 2 years after surgery to assess safety and durability of responses. Results: This study has accrued 12 participants to date, including 10 with triple negative breast cancer and 2 with high-risk HR+/HER2- breast cancer. Formal results for this study are forthcoming, as the trial is actively accruing at 6 institutions, with plans to open at 3 more within the year. For persons with a specific interest in this trial, please contact Joseph Connolly, Multi-Center Coordinator, at jconnolly28@mgh.harvard.edu. Citation Format: Joseph J. Connolly, Laura M. Spring, Alphonse G. Taghian, Michele Gadd, Laura Warren, Ana C. Garrido-Castro, Tari King, Elizabeth A. Mittendorf, Jose P. Leone, Dana L. Casey, Lisa Carey, Tiffany A. Traina, Yara Abdou, Atif Khan, George Plitas, Jean Wright, Cesar Augusto Santa-Maria, Lisa Jacobs, Rachel Blitzblau, E Shelley Hwang, Carey Anders, Ian Krop, Antonio C. Wolff, Alastair M. Thompson, Elyssa Denault, Gaorav Gupta, Alice Ho. TBCRC-053: P-RAD: A Randomized Study of Preoperative Chemotherapy, Pembrolizumab and No, Low or High Dose RADiation in Node-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-15-01.

Background: About half of all breast cancers exhibit low HER2 expression. Despite lack of ERBB2 amplification, HER2-low tumors respond to trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), leading to the NCCN recommendation of T-DXd both for patients with HER2+ and HER2-low metastatic breast cancer (MBC). It remains however unclear if HER2-low represents a distinct molecular entity, as compared to HER2-0 MBC. Here, we compare the genomic landscape of HER2-low versus HER2-0 breast cancers in a large, single institution cohort. Methods: We identified consecutive patients with MBC seen at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between 07/2013 and 12/2020. Patients were included if they had HER2-negative MBC per ASCO/CAP Guidelines and had undergone next generation sequencing (NGS) testing with a targeted, tumor-only platform (OncoPanel). Based on the HER2 status of the specimen tested by NGS, patients were divided into 2 groups: (i) HER2-low if immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+ or 2+ non-amplified, or (ii) HER2-0 if IHC 0. Mutations of interest detected on NGS were classified as oncogenic using the OncoKB tool and additional annotation. Genomic profiles of HER2-low and HER2-0 tumors were compared using Chi-Square and Kruskal-Wallis tests. To determine genomic event enrichment between the two HER2 groups, logistic regression models were used, accounting for background rate and estrogen receptor (ER) expression. ERBB2 copy counts were calculated for tumors with recorded histology-estimated purities and copy-number segmentation using a simple model of allelic gain/loss. Results: Among 1847 patients with HER2-negative MBC, 1043 underwent NGS testing on a HER2-low (n=489, 47%) or HER2-0 sample (n=554, 53%). Most samples were metastatic (71%, n=743) while 29% (n=300) were from primary tumors. 73% had ductal histology, 13% were lobular and 14% had mixed or other histology. ER expression was enriched among HER2-low vs. HER2-0 tumors (76% vs. 60%; p< 0.001). Focusing on the most commonly occurring genetic mutations, no major differences were observed in HER2-low vs. HER2-0 tumors, after correcting for ER status (Table 1). Among all mutational events, any mutation in MPL, CYLD, and MAP3K and oncogenic mutations in TP53 and NF1 were more common in HER2-0, while any mutation in MTOR, RAD21, DNMT3A, and PDGFRA were enriched in HER2-low patients, when controlling for ER status and background mutational rate (p< 0.05). However, no mutation reached significance after accounting for multiple hypothesis testing. Similarly, no deep deletion or high amplification CNV events reached significance for either group. Analysis of tumor mutational burden in HER2-low vs. HER-0 tumors revealed no significant differences (median: 7.26 muts/Mb vs. 7.60 muts/Mb, p=1.00), including when accounting for ER status. Finally, among tumors with sufficient tumor purity for ERBB2 copy count analysis (n=374 and 419 for HER2-low and HER2-0, respectively), HER2-low tumors had a significantly higher number of ERBB2 alleles as compared to HER2-0 (< 2 copies, 15.0% vs. 30.9%, 2 copies 67.4% vs. 60.5%, and >2 copies, 17.6% vs. 8.6%; p< 0.001 by Kruskal-Wallis). Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the largest comprehensive genomic analysis of HER2-low MBC to date. In our cohort of patients with HER2-negative MBC, the genomic landscape of HER2-low and HER2-0 tumors did not differ significantly, apart from a higher number of ERBB2 alleles. These data further support the notion that HER2-low, as currently defined, is not a distinct molecular subtype of breast cancer. Citation Format: Paolo Tarantino, Hersh V. Gupta, Melissa E. Hughes, Janet L. Files, Sarah Strauss, Gregory Kirkner, Anne-Marie Feeney, Yvonne Y. Li, Ana C. Garrido-Castro, Romualdo Barroso-Sousa, Brittany Bychkovsky, Laura MacConaill, Neal Lindeman, Bruce Johnson, Matthew Meyerson, Sheheryar Kabraji, Rinath Jeselsohn, Xintao Qiu, Rong Li, Henry W. Long, Eric Winer, Deborah A. Dillon, Giuseppe Curigliano, Andrew Cherniack, Sara Tolaney, Nancy U. Lin. HER2-05 Comprehensive genomic characterization of HER2-low breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr HER2-05.

Background. Patients (pts) who develop MBC at older ages are underrepresented in clinical trials, are less likely to be included in comprehensive biomarker characterization studies, and experience worse breast cancer-specific survival than their younger counterparts. Elucidating genomic underpinnings of MBC and possible therapeutic targets for older breast cancer patients are critical priorities. Methods. We identified pts age >70 years at MBC diagnosis and a younger cohort (ages 50-69; age < 50), who were treated for MBC at a single center and who had their metastatic (or if not available, the primary) tumor, assessed by a targeted, tumor-only next generation sequencing (NGS) platform (OncoPanel) between 2013-2020. The NGS panel included mutations, copy number variation, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and hypermutation (HM) status, with mutations classified as oncogenic using the OncoKB tool and additional annotation. Copy number events were selected as being “oncogenic” if a high amplification was called for an oncogene or a deep deletion for a tumor suppressor. We compared findings for older (age >70) vs. younger (age < 50 and ages 50-69) MBC pts using Chi-Square and Kruskal-Wallis tests. To determine genomic event enrichment, logistic regression (LR) models were used, controlling for age (continuous), background rate, and tumor subtype (those with unknown subtype [n=27] were excluded from models). False discovery rate (FDR) was used to correct for multiple hypothesis testing. Results. The final analytic cohort included 2,380 pts. The median age at MBC diagnosis was 54.1 years overall (range 18.5- 91.9) and 73.6 years for those age >70. A total of 137 metastatic and 76 primary tumors were sequenced in pts age >70; in those age < 70, 1383 metastatic and 784 primary tumors were sequenced (for age < 50 [n=857] and 50-69 [n=1310]). Older pts were more likely to present with HR+/HER2- tumors (70.9% v. 62.4% v. 52.4%), and less likely to present with HER2+ (9.4% v. 14.4% v. 22.8%) or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (18.8% v. 21.9% vs. 24.0%) at MBC diagnosis (listed >70, 50-69, < 50; P=1e-7). Older pts had higher average TMB vs. younger pts (9.57 in pts > 70, 8.56 in ages 50-69, 7.34 in ages < 50; P=3.5e-5). This was due to older pts having a higher incidence of hypermutation status as defined as TMB >10: 26.3% in age >70, 23.2% in ages 50-69, 16.8% in age < 50. Using q=0.1 as the threshold of significance, the presence of CDH1, PIK3CA, MAP3K1, TET2, and AKT oncogenic mutations were also enriched in older pts, while the presence of oncogenic GATA3, BRCA2, and TP53 mutations, as well as any mutation in BRCA1 were enriched in younger pts (too few oncogenic BRCA1 mutations were present for accurate modeling). The frequency of oncogenic PIK3CA mutations in HR+/HER2- tumors was highest in the oldest pts (44.4% in pts age >70 v. 31.6% in age 50-69 v. 26.7% in age < 50). Of pts who had oncogenic BRCA1/2 mutations identified on tumor-only NGS testing and underwent clinical germline testing (n=7 v. 60 v. 67, oldest to youngest), older pts had the lowest incidence of germline BRCA pathogenic variants (14.3% vs. 47.2.% vs. 67.2%; p=0.01); most BRCA mutations identified on NGS testing in older patients were considered likely somatic. When assessing enrichment in copy number events, ERBB2, RAD21, and BRIP1 amplifications were all significantly less frequent in older pts (q< 0.1), even when accounting for tumor subtype. Conclusions. In a large cohort of pts with MBC, the mutational and copy number landscape for older pts differs from that in younger pts, even after controlling for tumor subtype. Key actionable findings include a higher proportion of high TMB and PIK3CA-mutated tumors, emphasizing the importance of genomic profile testing in this pt population and further exploration of efficacy and tolerability of relevant therapies in those age >70 years. Citation Format: Hersh V. Gupta, Rachel Freedman, Melissa E. Hughes, Yvonne Y. Li, Gregory Kirkner, Janet L. Files, Sarah Strauss, Ana C. Garrido-Castro, Lauren Buckley, Romualdo Barroso-Sousa, Brittany Bychkovsky, Sara Tolaney, Laura MacConaill, Neal Lindeman, Bruce Johnson, Matthew Meyerson, Eric Winer, Deborah A. Dillon, Andrew Cherniack, Nancy U. Lin. Tumor Genomic Landscape in Older Women with Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-14-06.

Background: With the development of novel antibody drug conjugates (ADC), it is increasingly important to understand the changes that occur in cell-surface targets over time from early-stage to metastatic breast cancer. Discordance in HER2 expression per immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been reported between primary and metastatic tumors in patients (pts) with HER2-negative breast cancer defined per ASCO/CAP guidelines, with both gain and loss of expression described. Representation of HR-negative (TNBC) tumors has been limited in these studies, and HER2 status at multiple time points in TNBC has not been described. Here we report changes in HER2 IHC in patients diagnosed with TNBC, using a collection of matched tumor samples over time. Methods: Pts were identified from two sources: 1) an institutional database including all consecutive pts who underwent surgery for stage I-III breast cancer at Dana-Farber/Brigham Cancer Center between 2015-2018, and 2) a prospective research biopsy protocol for pts with known or suspected metastatic breast cancer. Pts were included in the present analysis if they received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for stage I-III TNBC (eTNBC), or if they were diagnosed with any stage TNBC and ultimately developed metastatic TNBC (mTNBC). Clinical pathology records were reviewed for HER2 IHC results of samples collected at: initial diagnosis (DX); residual disease (RD) post-NAC, if applicable; and at recurrence (M). HER2 IHC was classified as HER2-0 if HER2 IHC 0, and HER2-low if 1+ or 2+ (and ISH non-amplified). For matched comparisons, if IHC was performed in more than one DX sample (e.g., breast, node), only the breast was considered; if more than one M sample, only the first M biopsy with available IHC was considered. Results: Among 110 pts in this cohort, 101 were initially diagnosed with eTNBC (79 received NAC; 22 underwent surgery as first intervention) and 9 with de novo mTNBC. Median age was 48.7 years (range 19.8-71.6). Among all pts, a total of 292 samples (136 DX, 53 RD, 103 M) had available HER2 IHC scores. When restricting to one sample per time point, HER2-low prevalence was 49/102 (48.0%) in DX breast tumors, 21/53 (39.6%) in RD, and 13/58 (22.4%) in first M samples (with all remaining samples HER2-0, except one HER2 3+ sample). In eTNBC pts, HER2 IHC scores were available for 50 paired DX and RD, and 48 paired DX and M samples. Among 50 pts with paired DX and RD, HER2 IHC was discordant in 56% (28/50) (Table 1). Of the 21 HER2-0 DX tumors, 23.8% (5/21) became HER2-low at RD. Of the 29 HER2-low DX tumors, 51.7% (15/29) became HER2-0 at RD. Among 48 eTNBC pts who recurred and had paired DX and M samples, HER2 IHC was discordant in 50% (24/48) (Table 1). Change from HER2-0 to low was 12.5% (3/24), and from HER2-low to HER2-0 was 66.7% (16/24). Among 9 de novo mTNBC pts, 5 had HER2 IHC available in paired DX breast and M prior to starting therapy; 3 were concordant (IHC 0, n=2; IHC 1+, n=1), one had IHC 0 in DX breast and IHC 2+ in M (liver), one had IHC 1+ in DX breast and IHC 0 in M (node). Conclusions: HER2 IHC classification was discordant in about half of the TNBC cases we examined, with more frequent rates of conversion from HER2-low to HER2-0 in both paired DX/RD post-NAC, and paired DX/M samples. Additional analyses will be presented exploring HER2 IHC changes among multiple metastases per patient. Genomic and molecular analysis, including whole exome sequencing, RNA sequencing, and methylation profiling, are underway in these samples to further elucidate HER2 evolutionary dynamics. Citation Format: Ana C. Garrido-Castro, Lan D. Ngo, Edward T. Richardson, Allison Frangieh, Ayesha Mohammed-Abreu, Melissa E. Hughes, Jorge Gomez Tejada Zanudo, John Navarro, Paolo Tarantino, Elizabeth A. Mittendorf, Sara Tolaney, Tari King, Eric Winer, Nancy U. Lin, Nikhil Wagle. HER2-10 Dynamics of HER2-low expression in triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr HER2-10.

In the OlympiA study, 1 year of adjuvant olaparib significantly extended invasive disease-free survival and overall survival. The benefit was consistent across subgroups, and this regimen is now recommended after chemotherapy for germline BRCA1/2 mutation (gBRCA1/2m) carriers with high-risk, HER2-negative early breast cancer. However, the integration of olaparib in the landscape of agents currently available in the post(neo)adjuvant setting—ie, pembrolizumab, abemaciclib, and capecitabine—is challenging, as there are no data suggesting how to select, sequence, and/or combine these therapeutic approaches. Furthermore, it is unclear how to best identify additional patients who could benefit from adjuvant olaparib beyond the original OlympiA criteria. Since it is unlikely that new clinical trials will answer these questions, recommendations for clinical practice can be made through indirect evidence. In this article, we review available data that could help guide treatment decisions for gBRCA1/2m carriers with high-risk, early-stage breast cancer.

Background: Platinum agents induce DNA crosslinking and cause accumulation of genotoxic stress, which leads to immune activation via IFN-γ signaling, making the combination with nivolumab (PD-1 antibody) an attractive strategy to enhance the benefit of either agent alone in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). Methods: In this phase II open-label, investigator-initiated, multicenter trial, patients with unresectable locally advanced or mTNBC treated with 0-1 prior lines of chemotherapy in the metastatic setting were randomized 1:1 to carboplatin (AUC 6) with or without nivolumab (360 mg) IV every 3 weeks. Stratification factors included: germline BRCA (gBRCA) status, prior neo/adjuvant platinum, and number of prior lines of metastatic therapy. After approval of PD-L1 inhibition for mTNBC, the study was amended to include first-line mTNBC only and PD-L1 status was added as a stratification factor. Patients randomized to carboplatin alone were allowed to crossover at progression to receive nivolumab (+ nab-paclitaxel post-amendment). The primary objective was to compare progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST 1.1 criteria of carboplatin with or without nivolumab in first-line mTNBC in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Key secondary objectives were objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), clinical benefit rate, and duration and time to objective response. PD-L1 status was confirmed centrally using the SP142 Ventana assay (positive, ≥1% IC). Paired research biopsies at baseline, on-treatment and at progression were performed, if safely accessible. The trial closed to accrual prior to reaching target accrual due to approval of PD-1 inhibition in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy for PD-L1+ mTNBC. Results: Between 1/30/2018 and 12/9/2020, 78 patients enrolled. Three patients did not receive protocol treatment, and the safety analysis was conducted among the 75 that received any treatment; 37 received carboplatin + nivolumab (Arm A), 38 received carboplatin alone (Arm B). Median age was 59.1 yrs (range: 25.4-75.8). Four patients (5.3%) had a known gBRCA1/2 mutation. Sixty-two (82.7%) patients received 0 prior lines (ITT population) and 13 (17.3%) 1 prior line of metastatic therapy. Sixty-seven patients (89.3%) experienced any grade ≥2 treatment-related adverse event (AE). The most frequent AE were platelet count decrease (n=40; 53.3%), anemia (n=36; 48.0%), neutrophil count decrease (n=33; 44.0%) and fatigue (n=24; 32.0%). Grade 3/4 AE were observed in 46 (61.3%) patients, and there was one grade 5 AE (COVID19 pneumonia). Any grade ≥2 immune-related AE (irAE) were observed in 25 of the 37 (67.6%) patients treated with carboplatin + nivolumab. Grade 3/4 irAE were observed in 11 (29.7%) patients. In the ITT population (32 on Arm A; 30 on Arm B), median PFS was 4.2 months with carboplatin + nivolumab, and 5.5 months with carboplatin (stratified HR 0.98, 95% CI [0.51 - 1.88]; p=0.95). ORR was 25% vs. 23.3%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 23.5 months, median OS was 17.5 months vs. 10.7 months (stratified HR 0.63, 95% CI [0.32 - 1.24]; p=0.18). In patients with PD-L1+ mTNBC (13 on Arm A; 11 on Arm B), median PFS was 8.3 months and 4.7 months, respectively (stratified HR 0.63, 95% CI [0.21 - 1.89]; p=0.41). ORR was 23.1% vs. 27.3%, respectively. Median OS was 17.5 months vs. 9.6 months (stratified HR 0.59, 95% CI [0.20 - 1.75]; p=0.34). Conclusions: Addition of nivolumab to carboplatin in patients with previously untreated mTNBC, unselected by PD-L1 status, did not significantly improve PFS. A trend toward improved PFS and OS was observed in patients with PD-L1+ mTNBC. Tissue, blood and intestinal microbiome biomarker analyses are planned; bulk tumor and single-cell sequencing, and TCR sequencing in peripheral blood are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03414684. Citation Format: Ana C Garrido-Castro, Noah Graham, Kevin Bi, Jihye Park, Jingxin Fu, Tanya Keenan, Edward Thomas Richardson, Ricardo Pastorello, Paulina Lange, Victoria Attaya, Robert Wesolowski, Natalie Sinclair, Zarah Lucas, Steve Lo, Nadine Tung, Meredith Faggen, Peter A Kaufman, Caroline C Block, Fred Briccetti, Madhavi Toke, Wendy Chen, Kai Wucherpfennig, Sascha Marx, Ye Tian, Judith Agudo, Jennifer L Guerriero, Stuart Schnitt, Nancy U Lin, Eric P Winer, Elizabeth A Mittendorf, Nabihah Tayob, Eliezer Van Allen, Sara M Tolaney. A randomized phase II trial of carboplatin with or without nivolumab in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-14-18.

Purpose:In contrast to recurrence after initial diagnosis of stage I–III breast cancer [recurrent metastatic breast cancer (rMBC)], de novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC) represents a unique setting to elucidate metastatic drivers in the absence of treatment selection. We present the genomic landscape of dnMBC and association with overall survival (OS).Experimental Design:Targeted DNA sequencing (OncoPanel) was prospectively performed on either primary or metastatic tumors from 926 patients (212 dnMBC and 714 rMBC). Single-nucleotide variants, copy-number variations, and tumor mutational burden (TMB) in treatment-naïve dnMBC primary tumors were compared with primary tumors in patients who ultimately developed rMBC, and correlated with OS across all dnMBC.Results:When comparing primary tumors by subtype, MYB amplification was enriched in triple-negative dnMBC versus rMBC (21.1% vs. 0%, P = 0.0005, q = 0.111). Mutations in KMTD2, SETD2, and PIK3CA were more prevalent, and TP53 and BRCA1 less prevalent, in primary HR+/HER2− tumors of dnMBC versus rMBC, though not significant after multiple comparison adjustment. Alterations associated with shorter OS in dnMBC included TP53 (wild-type: 79.7 months; altered: 44.2 months; P = 0.008, q = 0.107), MYC (79.7 vs. 23.3 months; P = 0.0003, q = 0.011), and cell-cycle (122.7 vs. 54.9 months; P = 0.034, q = 0.245) pathway genes. High TMB correlated with better OS in triple-negative dnMBC (P = 0.041).Conclusions:Genomic differences between treatment-naïve dnMBC and primary tumors of patients who developed rMBC may provide insight into mechanisms underlying metastatic potential and differential therapeutic sensitivity in dnMBC. Alterations associated with poor OS in dnMBC highlight the need for novel approaches to overcome potential intrinsic resistance to current treatments.

Supplementary Figure 1: Representative images of high and low sTILs.

The presence of disseminated tumor cells in breast cancer patient bone marrow aspirates predicts decreased recurrence-free survival. Although it is appreciated that physiologic, pathologic, and therapeutic conditions impact hematopoiesis, it remains unclear whether targeting hematopoiesis presents opportunities for limiting bone metastasis. Using preclinical breast cancer models, we discovered that marrow from mice treated with the bisphosphonate zoledronic acid (ZA) are metastasis-suppressive. Specifically, ZA modulated hematopoietic myeloid/osteoclast progenitor cell (M/OCP) lineage potential to activate metastasis-suppressive activity. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) promoted ZA resistance by redirecting M/OCP differentiation. We identified M/OCP and bone marrow transcriptional programs associated with metastasis suppression and ZA resistance. Analysis of patient blood samples taken at randomization revealed that women with high-plasma G-CSF experienced significantly worse outcome with adjuvant ZA than those with lower G-CSF levels. Our findings support discovery of therapeutic strategies to direct M/OCP lineage potential and biomarkers that stratify responses in patients at risk of recurrence.Significance: Bone marrow myeloid/osteoclast progenitor cell lineage potential has a profound impact on breast cancer bone metastasis and can be modulated by G-CSF and bone-targeting agents. Cancer Res; 78(18); 5300–14. ©2018 AACR.

Supplementary Figures and Table Legends to support primary figures

Dataset 2: Metadata and clonotype data for TCRβ sequencing (Archer) in 4 patients (peripheral CD8+ PD-1HI and CD8+ PD-1NEG T cells and post-NAC tumor), before (n=3) and after (n=4) NAC.

Supplementary Figure 5: The change in sTILs during NAC is not prognostic for outcome in TNBC patients with residual disease.

Figures S1-S14

Supplementary Methods

Dataset 1: Metadata and clonotype data for TCRβ sequencing (Adaptive) in 15 pairs of NAC-treated patients (tumor data).

Supplementary Figure 2: Pre-NAC sTILs have minimal prognostic value in breast cancer patients with residual disease.

Kaplan-Meier Curves for Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival by high TMB {greater than or equal to}7 mutations/Mb and PTEN alterations in Chemotherapy-Treated mTNBC. (A) Progression-free survival and (C) overall survival by tumor mutational burden

Tables S1-S12

Purpose:The recent approval of anti-programmed death-ligand 1 immunotherapy in combination with nab-paclitaxel for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) highlights the need to understand the role of chemotherapy in modulating the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME).Experimental Design:We examined immune-related gene expression patterns before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in a series of 83 breast tumors, including 44 TNBCs, from patients with residual disease (RD). Changes in gene expression patterns in the TIME were tested for association with recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS). In addition, we sought to characterize the systemic effects of NAC through single-cell analysis (RNAseq and cytokine secretion) of programmed death-1–high (PD-1HI) CD8+ peripheral T cells and examination of a cytolytic gene signature in whole blood.Results:In non-TNBC, no change in expression of any single gene was associated with RFS or OS, while in TNBC upregulation of multiple immune-related genes and gene sets were associated with improved long-term outcome. High cytotoxic T-cell signatures present in the peripheral blood of patients with breast cancer at surgery were associated with persistent disease and recurrence, suggesting active antitumor immunity that may indicate ongoing disease burden.Conclusions:We have characterized the effects of NAC on the TIME, finding that TNBC is uniquely sensitive to the immunologic effects of NAC, and local increases in immune genes/sets are associated with improved outcomes. However, expression of cytotoxic genes in the peripheral blood, as opposed to the TIME, may be a minimally invasive biomarker of persistent micrometastatic disease ultimately leading to recurrence.

Supplemental Figure 1 shows the tumor masses of the subcutaneous tumors shown in Figure 1, as well as the flow cytometry gating strategy of M/OCP populations and the osteoclast differentiation assay experimental schematic. Supplemental Figure 2 shows representative images and the flow cytometry gating strategy for the in vitro osteoclast differentiation assay demonstrated in Figure 2. Supplemental Figure 3 shows that ZA inhibits breast cancer metastasis in a manner that is counteracted by G-CSF in intratibial injections, subcutaneous bone marrow functional assays, and with intracardiac injections of the B1 cell line following pre-treatment with Ctl or ZA and/or recombinant G-CSF. Supplemental Figure 4 shows the tumor masses of the subcutaneous tumors shown in Figure 4, as well as the plasma ALP and NTX concentrations in nude mice with and without ZA treatment. Supplemental Figure 5 shows the representative images and quantifications of the in vitro osteoclast differentiation assay with whole bone marrow from Ctl- or ZA- donors. Supplemental Figure 6 shows the volcano plots, heatmaps of differentially expressed genes, and gene ontology categories for the RNA-sequencing analysis of whole bone marrow from mice treated with Ctl, ZA, G-CSF, or ZA+G-CSF. Supplemental Figure 7 shows the determination of cut point analyses for the plasma G-CSF concentrations and patient outcome data shown in Figure 7.

Functionally enriched gene ontology (GO) terms and differentially enriched genes for the RNA-sequencing tables and heatmaps included in the manuscript text.

Supplementary Figure 7: Changes in immunologic signatures in response to NAC are not associated with outcome in non-TNBC tumors with residual disease.

Supplementary Figure 3: The prognostic value of sTILs is primarily confined to the post-NAC specimen in TNBC patients with residual disease.

Purpose:Few patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). On the basis of immunotherapy response correlates in other cancers, we evaluated whether high tumor mutational burden (TMB) ≥10 nonsynonymous mutations/megabase and PTEN alterations, defined as nonsynonymous mutations or 1 or 2 copy deletions, were associated with clinical benefit to anti-PD-1/L1 therapy in mTNBC.Experimental Design:We identified patients with mTNBC, who consented to targeted DNA sequencing and were treated with ICIs on clinical trials between April 2014 and January 2019 at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (Boston, MA). Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were correlated with tumor genomic features.Results:Sixty-two women received anti-PD-1/L1 inhibitors alone (23%) or combined with targeted therapy (19%) or chemotherapy (58%). High TMB (18%) was associated with significantly longer PFS (12.5 vs. 3.7 months; P = 0.04), while PTEN alterations (29%) were associated with significantly lower ORR (6% vs. 48%; P = 0.01), shorter PFS (2.3 vs. 6.1 months; P = 0.01), and shorter OS (9.7 vs. 20.5 months; P = 0.02). Multivariate analyses confirmed that these associations were independent of performance status, prior lines of therapy, therapy regimen, and visceral metastases. The survival associations were additionally independent of PD-L1 in patients with known PD-L1 and were not found in mTNBC cohorts treated with chemotherapy (n = 90) and non-ICI regimens (n = 169).Conclusions:Among patients with mTNBC treated with anti-PD-1/L1 therapies, high TMB and PTEN alterations were associated with longer and shorter survival, respectively. These observations warrant validation in larger datasets.

Supplementary Figure 6: Neither time of sample nor institution drive significant gene expression changes.

Supplementary Tables

Supplementary Figure 4: sTILs are not prognostic in ER+ or HER2+ disease.

Extended methods and results, including e-references

Supplementary Figure 8: Changes in immune-related genes in response to NAC are not associated with outcome in ER+ or HER2+ tumors with residual disease.

We performed single-cell RNA-sequencing and T cell receptor clonotype tracking of breast and ovarian cancer patients treated with the CDK4/6 inhibitor ribociclib and PD-1 blockade. We highlight evidence of two orthogonal treatment-associated phenomena: expansion of T cell effector populations and promotion of T cell memory formation. Augmentation of the antitumor memory pool by ribociclib boosts the efficacy of subsequent PD-1 blockade in mouse models of melanoma and breast cancer, pointing toward sequential therapy as a potentially safe and synergistic strategy in patients.

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States (US). Most patients are diagnosed with early-stage disease; however, there is still a need to prevent recurrences that often present as incurable metastatic disease. The treatment landscape of early-stage breast cancer is evolving rapidly. The immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab is approved in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of high-risk triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4 and 6 inhibitor abemaciclib is approved for adjuvant treatment of patients with high-risk hormone receptor (HR)-positive disease. While adjuvant olaparib has shown significant improvement in outcomes for patients with pathogenic/likely pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations and high-risk human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer, and is approved in this setting. For the HER2-positive subtype, the post-neoadjuvant therapy can be tailored based on the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and HER2-targeted agents. In this narrative review, we summarize the most recent approvals for early-stage breast cancer as well as frequently encountered clinical challenges utilizing these medications.

The AURORA US Metastasis Project was established with the goal to identify molecular features associated with metastasis. We assayed 55 females with metastatic breast cancer (51 primary cancers and 102 metastases) by RNA sequencing, tumor/germline DNA exome and low-pass whole-genome sequencing and global DNA methylation microarrays. Expression subtype changes were observed in ~30% of samples and were coincident with DNA clonality shifts, especially involving HER2. Downregulation of estrogen receptor (ER)-mediated cell-cell adhesion genes through DNA methylation mechanisms was observed in metastases. Microenvironment differences varied according to tumor subtype; the ER

Background: Advances in HER2-directed therapy have significantly improved survival in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer. Approximately 30% of de novo metastatic inflammatory breast cancer (mIBC) is HER2+, though there has been limited IBC representation in clinical trials evaluating the role of HER2-directed agents as first-line metastatic therapy. Elevated rates of locoregional progression or recurrence (LRPR) with systemic therapy alone also raise the question of whether trimodality therapy (TMT) may improve outcomes in IBC patients (pts) with limited metastatic disease, particularly in the setting of increasingly effective anti-HER2 therapy. Methods: Pts diagnosed with de novo HER2+ mIBC were identified from an IRB-approved IBC registry at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. Clinical, pathology and treatment data were manually abstracted by chart review. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as time from IBC diagnosis to LRPR, distant progression/relapse or death (in the absence of event, censored at date of last follow-up). Overall survival (OS) was defined as time from IBC diagnosis to death from any cause or censored at date last known alive. For pts who underwent surgery of the primary tumor, pathologic complete response (pCR) was defined as no residual invasive carcinoma in the breast and axilla and survival was estimated from date of surgery. Median PFS and OS were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method; cumulative incidence of CNS metastasis and LRPR were estimated with death as competing risk. Results: 78 pts diagnosed between 1998-2019 with de novo HER2+ mIBC (41 hormone receptor (HR)-positive; 37 HR-negative) were identified. Median age at diagnosis was 53 years (yr; range: 24-91). Sites of metastatic disease at presentation included bone only (n=12), lymph node/contralateral chest wall only (n=17), bone and lymph node (n=5), visceral (n=40) and CNS with extracranial disease (n=4). As initial HER2-directed therapy, 37 pts received trastuzumab (H), 40 H plus pertuzumab and 1 T-DM1. At a median follow-up of 2.7 yr in the overall cohort, median PFS was 1.0 yr (IQR: 0.5-2.8 yr; 60 events) and median OS was 4.6 yr (IQR: 2.9-8.7 yr; 39 deaths). 34 pts had CNS metastasis with a cumulative incidence of 20% and 28% at 1 and 2 yr, respectively. LRPR developed in 26 pts, of which 16 occurred within 12 months (mo) of diagnosis. Cumulative incidence of LRPR at 1 and 2 yr was 21% and 29%, respectively. In 41 pts (53%), mastectomy was performed after receipt of systemic therapy. Median time from IBC diagnosis to surgery was 7.5 mo (IQR: 6.0-9.9 mo). Radiation was administered in 33 pts, 3 pre- and 30 post-mastectomy. Median OS from surgery was 5.2 yr (IQR: 3.1-8.4 yr). 9/41 pts (22%) achieved pCR; all pCR pts were alive at 1.3-8.9 yr since surgery. To investigate the value of therapy for locoregional control, a landmark analysis was performed in the subset of pts alive and LRPR free at 12 mo from diagnosis (n=56). 27 had surgery within 12 mo from diagnosis and 29 did not. LRPR occurred in 10/56; 9 were among pts who did not undergo surgery. Cumulative LRPR incidence at 1 and 2 yr since the 12 mo landmark was 21% and 29%, respectively, in pts who did not undergo surgery, and 0% at both time points in pts who had surgery (1 LRPR at 8 yr). Conclusion: Long-term outcomes in de novo HER2+ mIBC are overall similar to those reported in metastatic HER2+ non-IBC. More than half of pts underwent systemic and local therapy with good locoregional control and prolonged survival, suggesting a potential role for aggressive local therapy in this mIBC subset with favorable prognosis and effective systemic therapy. The high incidence of early CNS involvement in de novo HER2+ mIBC prompted us to explore this group in detail (Warren SABCS 2020 abstract). Larger studies are needed to better understand the effectiveness of TMT in HER2+ mIBC, highlighting the importance of collaborative research efforts in this rare subset. Citation Format: Ana C. Garrido-Castro, Samuel M. Niman, Marie Claire Remolano, Jennifer M. Rosenbluth, Caroline Block, Laura E. Warren, Jennifer Bellon, Beth T. Harrison, Faina Nakhlis, Meredith Regan, Beth Overmoyer. Clinical outcomes in de novo metastatic HER2-positive inflammatory breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS10-34.

Purpose: In contrast to recurrence after initial diagnosis of stage I–III breast cancer [recurrent metastatic breast cancer (rMBC)], de novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC) represents a unique setting to elucidate metastatic drivers in the absence of treatment selection. We present the genomic landscape of dnMBC and association with overall survival (OS). Experimental Design: Targeted DNA sequencing (OncoPanel) was prospectively performed on either primary or metastatic tumors from 926 patients (212 dnMBC and 714 rMBC). Single-nucleotide variants, copy-number variations, and tumor mutational burden (TMB) in treatment-naïve dnMBC primary tumors were compared with primary tumors in patients who ultimately developed rMBC, and correlated with OS across all dnMBC. Results: When comparing primary tumors by subtype, MYB amplification was enriched in triple-negative dnMBC versus rMBC (21.1% vs. 0%, P = 0.0005, q = 0.111). Mutations in KMTD2, SETD2, and PIK3CA were more prevalent, and TP53 and BRCA1 less prevalent, in primary HR+/HER2− tumors of dnMBC versus rMBC, though not significant after multiple comparison adjustment. Alterations associated with shorter OS in dnMBC included TP53 (wild-type: 79.7 months; altered: 44.2 months; P = 0.008, q = 0.107), MYC (79.7 vs. 23.3 months; P = 0.0003, q = 0.011), and cell-cycle (122.7 vs. 54.9 months; P = 0.034, q = 0.245) pathway genes. High TMB correlated with better OS in triple-negative dnMBC (P = 0.041). Conclusions: Genomic differences between treatment-naïve dnMBC and primary tumors of patients who developed rMBC may provide insight into mechanisms underlying metastatic potential and differential therapeutic sensitivity in dnMBC. Alterations associated with poor OS in dnMBC highlight the need for novel approaches to overcome potential intrinsic resistance to current treatments.

Purpose: The recent approval of anti-programmed death-ligand 1 immunotherapy in combination with nab-paclitaxel for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) highlights the need to understand the role of chemotherapy in modulating the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). Experimental Design: We examined immune-related gene expression patterns before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in a series of 83 breast tumors, including 44 TNBCs, from patients with residual disease (RD). Changes in gene expression patterns in the TIME were tested for association with recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS). In addition, we sought to characterize the systemic effects of NAC through single-cell analysis (RNAseq and cytokine secretion) of programmed death-1–high (PD-1HI) CD8+ peripheral T cells and examination of a cytolytic gene signature in whole blood. Results: In non-TNBC, no change in expression of any single gene was associated with RFS or OS, while in TNBC upregulation of multiple immune-related genes and gene sets were associated with improved long-term outcome. High cytotoxic T-cell signatures present in the peripheral blood of patients with breast cancer at surgery were associated with persistent disease and recurrence, suggesting active antitumor immunity that may indicate ongoing disease burden. Conclusions: We have characterized the effects of NAC on the TIME, finding that TNBC is uniquely sensitive to the immunologic effects of NAC, and local increases in immune genes/sets are associated with improved outcomes. However, expression of cytotoxic genes in the peripheral blood, as opposed to the TIME, may be a minimally invasive biomarker of persistent micrometastatic disease ultimately leading to recurrence.

PURPOSE Given regulatory approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with mismatch repair–deficient (MMR-D) cancers agnostic to tumor type, it has become important to characterize occurrence of MMR-D and develop cost-effective screening approaches. Using a next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel (OncoPanel), we developed an algorithm to identify MMR-D frequency in tumor samples and applied it in a clinical setting with pathologist review. METHODS To predict MMR-D, we adapted methods described previously for use in NGS panels, which assess patterns of single base-pair insertion or deletion events occurring in homopolymer regions. Tumors assayed with OncoPanel between July 2013 and July 2018 were included. For tumors tested after June 2017, sequencing results were presented to pathologists in real time for clinical MMR determination, in the context of tumor mutation burden, other mutational signatures, and clinical data. RESULTS Of 20,301 tumors sequenced, 2.7% (553) were retrospectively classified as MMR-D by the algorithm. Of 4,404 samples with pathologist sign-out of MMR status, the algorithm classified 147 (3.3%) as MMR-D: in 116 cases, MMR-D was confirmed by a pathologist, five cases were overruled by the pathologist, and 26 were assessed as indeterminate. Overall, the highest frequencies of OncoPanel-inferred MMR-D were in endometrial (21%; 152/723), colorectal (9.7%; 169/1,744), and small bowel (9.3%; 9/97) cancers. When algorithm predictions were compared with historical MMR immunohistochemistry or polymerase chain reaction results in a set of 325 tumors sequenced before initiation of pathologist assessment, the overall sensitivity and specificity of the algorithm were 91.1% and 98.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION We show that targeted, tumor-only NGS can be leveraged to determine MMR signatures across tumor types, suggesting that broader biomarker screening approaches may have clinical value.

Background: Despite advances in treatment options, outcomes remain poor for many pts with breast cancer brain metastases (BCBMs). Identifying genomic predictors of brain metastasis from primary tumors could lead to better stratification of pts at risk and drive the development of preventative strategies. The objective of this study was to describe the landscape of genomic alterations in primary tumors from pts with MBC who subsequently did or did not develop BCBMs. Methods: We performed a case control study to identify somatic alterations in primary tumors associated with a higher incidence of brain metastases. We reviewed outcomes for 2562 unique MBC patients from a single institution who underwent targeted next-generation DNA sequencing of > 280 cancer-related genes (OncoPanel) from their tumor between July 1, 2013 and December 31, 2020. Pts were included in this analysis if they had at least 2 years of follow-up from date of metastatic diagnosis and OncoPanel testing on a primary breast tumor. We compared single nucleotide variants (oncogenic or likely oncogenic), copy number variation (amplification and deep deletions) and tumor mutation burden in the primary tumors of pts in this cohort. Copy number variation was corrected for Panel version and tumor purity. Wilcoxon rank sum test and Fisher exact test was used to compare genomic differences between groups. False discovery rate was used to correct for multiple hypothesis testing and q < 0.1 was considered significant Results: A total of 369 pts were included in the final analytic cohort. Of these, 115 were diagnosed with brain mets (cases, BM group) and 224 were not (controls, nBM group). The BM group was enriched for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (33 vs 12.5%), consistent with previous work. In the whole cohort, the most common and clinically significant somatic alterations (oncogenic single nucleotide variants or copy number high amplification or two copy deletion) are shown in Table 1. When adjusting for subtype there were no significantly enriched SNVs in BM vs nBM group. When adjusting for subtype, FGFR1 amplification was significantly enriched in hormone receptor positive HER2 negative (HR+ HER2-) patients with BM (log2 odds ratio 1.22, q < 0.1). Tumor mutation burden was not significantly different in primary tumors between the BM and nBM groups (median TMB 7.3 vs 6.1, Wilcoxon p = 0.08). Pathway analysis combining all subtypes revealed that RTK_RAS pathway (log2 odds ratio 1.64, q value < 0.1) and TP53 pathway (log2 odds ratio 1.15, q value < 0.1) gene sets were significantly enriched in the BM group. When controlling for subtype, pathway analysis revealed that RTK_RAS pathway gene set was significantly enriched in HR+ HER2- BM group (log2 odds ratio 1.36 q < 0.1). Conclusions: In this case control series of patients with metastatic breast cancer with or without brain metastases, we found that primary tumors that are enriched for somatic alterations in the RTK_RAS and TP53 pathway may be associated with higher risk of developing brain metastases. Further validation in larger cohorts is warranted. Table 1. Frequency of somatic alterations in primary tumor by brain metastasis outcome. Citation Format: Sheheryar Kabraji, Yvonne Y. Li, Melissa E. Hughes, Hersh V. Gupta, Lauren Buckley, Janet L. Files, Ayesha Mohammed-Abreu, Anne-Marie Feeney, Greg Kirkner, Ashka Patel, Ana C. Garrido-Castro, Romualdo Barroso-Sousa, Brittany Bychkovsky, Matthew Meyerson, Sara Tolaney, Deborah A. Dillon, Bruce Johnson, Eric Winer, Andrew Cherniack, Nancy U. Lin. Somatic alterations in primary tumors of patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) may predict likelihood of brain metastasis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD7-07.

The addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to frontline chemotherapy has improved survival for patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) expressing programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). Nonetheless, most patients develop resistance, with outcomes remaining poor for this population. Moreover, unsatisfactory activity has been observed with ICIs in PD-L1-negative TNBC and in other breast cancer (BC) subtypes, warranting a deeper understanding of resistance to ICIs in BC.We discuss the immune landscape of distinct BC subtypes, review the clinical activity of immunotherapy in BC, and highlight strategies under development to overcome resistance to ICIs.Activity and resistance to ICIs in BC are strongly related to the intrinsic immunophenotype of the tumor tissue. Several promising biomarkers reflecting the immunological state of BC are emerging, with only PD-L1 expression currently adopted into clinical practice. However, limitations make of PD-L1 a sub-optimal biomarker for patient selection, which require efforts to integrate this marker with other immunological features. Concomitantly, a wide variety of drug combinations designed to overcome immune-resistance are being evaluated, with some encouraging signals observed in early-phase trials. Combination strategies tailored to patient and tumor immunophenotype may allow to overcome resistance and fully exploit the potential of ICIs.

PURPOSE The yield of comprehensive genomic profiling in recruiting patients to molecular-based trials designed for small subgroups has not been fully evaluated. We evaluated the likelihood of enrollment in a clinical trial that required the identification of a specific genomic change based on our institute-wide genomic tumor profiling. PATIENTS AND METHODS Using genomic profiling from archived tissue samples derived from patients with metastatic breast cancer treated between 2011 and 2017, we assessed the impact of systematic genomic characterization on enrollment in an ongoing phase II trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01670877 ). Our primary aim was to describe the proportion of patients with a qualifying ERBB2 mutation identified by our institutional genomic panel (OncoMap or OncoPanel) who enrolled in the trial. Secondary objectives included median time from testing result to trial registration, description of the spectrum of ERBB2 mutations, and survival. Associations were calculated using Fisher’s exact test. RESULTS We identified a total of 1,045 patients with metastatic breast cancer without ERBB2 amplification who had available genomic testing results. Of these, 42 patients were found to have ERBB2 mutation and 19 patients (1.8%) were eligible for the trial on the basis of the presence of an activating mutation, 18 of which were identified by OncoPanel testing. Fifty-eight percent of potentially eligible patients were approached, and 33.3% of eligible patients enrolled in the trial guided exclusively by OncoPanel testing. CONCLUSION More than one half of eligible patients were approached for trial participation and, significantly, one third of those were enrolled in NCT01670877. Our data illustrate the ability to enroll patients in trials of rare subsets in routine clinical practice and highlight the need for these broadly based approaches to effectively support the success of these studies.

Atezolizumab has emerged as a novel treatment in patients with triple-negative breast cancer showing unprecedented survival gain. This breakthrough benefit is exclusively observed in PD-L1-positive patients, but PD-L1 positivity still lacks a reliable definition. In this review, we discuss the current data on PD-L1 testing and its impact on the treatment of patients. The VENTANA SP142 assay was used in the trial that led to the approval of atezolizumab in the first-line setting. However, recent data show that this assay appears to be less sensitive to detect PD-L1 expression compared with other assays. Also, the intra- and inter-pathologist variability is substantial when performing various assays. PD-L1 testing remains a challenge in clinical practice. The variability and performance of assays may be an issue, and clinicians should avoid the interchangeability between assays. More studies are needed to elucidate the best way to use PD-L1 testing.

Purpose: To date no biomarker has been identified that predicts response to ICI in mTNBC. This study aimed to explore if tumor genomic alterations correlate with efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition in patients (pts) with mTNBC. Methods: Demographic, treatment response, and long-term outcome data were collected on patients with mTNBC treated at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) under several clinical trials incorporating PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, given as monotherapy or combined with chemotherapy (CT). Pts included in this analysis had available results of targeted exon sequencing performed using Oncopanel, our institutional gene sequencing panel, on archival tumor tissue. TMB was calculated by determining the number of non-synonymous somatic mutations that occur per megabase of exonic sequence data across all genes on the panel. High TMB was defined as 310 mutations/megabase. TMB and gene alterations were correlated with objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1, progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 50 pts with mTNBC were included in this analysis. At baseline, the median age was 55.9 years (31.8–75.9), 60% had ECOG 0 and 40% had ECOG 1, 72% had visceral metastasis, and 46% had received 31 prior lines of systemic therapy in the metastatic setting. While 26% of pts received monotherapy [pembrolizumab (n=7, NCT02447003); atezolizumab (n=6; NCT01375842)], 74% received combination with CT [pembrolizumab plus eribulin (n=31; NCT02513472); atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel (n=6; NCT01633970)]. PTEN alterations were present in 30% of pts (mutations = 7; one copy number loss = 7; two copy number loss = 1). Median follow-up was 14 months (1–40). Pts with tumors harboring PTEN alterations had lower ORR (7% vs 57%; P Table 1.Multivariable analysis for PFS Hazard ratioConfidence Intervalp-valueCombination therapy0.420.16 – 1.130.009Visceral metastasis1.310.63 – 2.770.46Previous lines of therapy1.020.09 – 0.700.85ECOG 12.11.06 – 1.280.034PTEN altered3.741.65 – 8.440.002Hypermutated tumors0.850.75 – 0.970.011 Citation Format: Barroso-Sousa R, Tyekucheva S, Pernas-Simon S, Exman P, Jain E, Garrido-Castro AC, Hughes M, Bychkovsky B, Di Lascio S, Umeton R, Files J, Lindeman NI, MacConaill LE, Hodi FS, Krop IE, Dillon D, Winer EP, Wagle N, Lin NU, Mittendorf EA, Tolaney SM. PTEN alterations and tumor mutational burden (TMB) as potential predictors of resistance or response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-12-02.

OBJECTIVES Dermal lymphatic invasion (DLI) with tumor emboli is a common pathologic characteristic of inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), although its presence is not required for diagnosis. We examined whether documented DLI on skin biopsy was associated with survival and time to recurrence or progression in IBC. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 340 women enrolled in the IBC Registry at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between 1997 and 2019 were included in this study. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for associations of DLI and overall survival, time to locoregional recurrence/progression, and distant metastasis by stage at presentation. RESULTS DLI was detected in 215 (63.2%) of IBC cases overall. At disease presentation, IBC with DLI had a higher prevalence of de novo metastases (37.7% vs. 26.4%), breast skin ulceration (6.1% vs. 2.4%), and lymphovascular invasion within the breast parenchyma (52.9% vs. 25.5%) and a lower prevalence of palpable breast mass (48.2% vs. 70.6%) than IBC without DLI. Over a median follow-up of 2.0 years, 147 deaths occurred. DLI was not associated with survival or recurrence in multivariable models (all P ≥0.10). For example, among women with stage III disease, hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for DLI presence was 1.29 (0.77-2.15) for overall survival, 1.29 (0.56-3.00) for locoregional recurrence, and 1.71 (0.97-3.02) for distant metastasis. CONCLUSION Although the extent of tumor emboli in dermal lymphatics may be associated with biological features of IBC, DLI was not an independent prognostic marker of clinical outcomes in this study.

The 21-gene Recurrence Score (RS) assay has been validated as both a prognostic and predictive tool in node-negative (pN0), estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), HER2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer. A large body of evidence supports the clinical utility of the RS in the node positive (pN+) population as well. Retrospective analyses of archived tissue from multiple clinical trials have found the RS to be prognostic in both endocrine therapy (ET)-treated and chemotherapy-treated patient with pN+ disease. Distribution of RS results in pN+ patients have also been consistent with those of pN0 populations. Data from the SWOG 8814 trial and large population-based registries further support the prognostic and potential predictive value of the RS. Specifically, patients with 1 to 3 positive nodes and RS less than 18 derived negligible benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in these studies. In the prospective West German Study Group PlanB and ADAPT trials, pN+ patients with RS less than 11 and RS 25 or less, respectively, who were treated with ET alone experienced excellent outcomes. Finally, 5-year results of the RxPONDER clinical trial randomizing patients with 1 to 3 positive nodes and RS 25 or less to ET alone vs ET plus chemotherapy confirmed an absence of chemotherapy benefit in postmenopausal patients. Clinical practice guidelines support use of the RS in the pN+, ER+/HER2- population, and many institutions have adopted the RS to guide clinical decisionmaking, resulting in a net reduction of adjuvant chemotherapy use. This review highlights the existing data supporting the prognostic and predictive ability of the RS in pN+ disease, current practice patterns related to RS use in this population, and emerging applications.

BackgroundTreatment options for triple-negative breast cancer remain limited. Activation of the PI3K pathway via loss ofPTENand/orINPP4Bis common. Buparlisib is an orally bioavailable, pan-class I PI3K inhibitor. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of buparlisib in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.MethodsThis was a single-arm phase 2 study enrolling patients with triple-negative metastatic breast cancer. Patients were treated with buparlisib at a starting dose of 100 mg daily. The primary endpoint was clinical benefit, defined as confirmed complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) for ≥ 4 months, per RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. A subset of patients underwent pre- and on-treatment tumor tissue biopsies for correlative studies.ResultsFifty patients were enrolled. Median number of cycles was 2 (range 1–10). The clinical benefit rate was 12% (6 patients, all SD ≥ 4 months). Median PFS was 1.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6–2.3). Median OS was 11.2 months (95% CI 6.2–25). The most frequent adverse events were fatigue (58% all grades, 8% grade 3), nausea (34% all grades, none grade 3), hyperglycemia (34% all grades, 4% grade 3), and anorexia (30% all grades, 2% grade 3). Eighteen percent of patients experienced depression (12% grade 1, 6% grade 2) and anxiety (10% grade 1, 8% grade 2). Alterations inPIK3CA/AKT1/PTENwere present in 6/27 patients with available targeted DNA sequencing (MSK-IMPACT), 3 of whom achieved SD as best overall response though none with clinical benefit ≥ 4 months. Of five patients with paired baseline and on-treatment biopsies, reverse phase protein arrays (RPPA) analysis demonstrated reduction of S6 phosphorylation in 2 of 3 patients who achieved SD, and in none of the patients with progressive disease.ConclusionsBuparlisib was associated with prolonged SD in a very small subset of patients with triple-negative breast cancer; however, no confirmed objective responses were observed. Downmodulation of key nodes in the PI3K pathway was observed in patients who achieved SD. PI3K pathway inhibition alone may be insufficient as a therapeutic strategy for triple-negative breast cancer.Trial registrationNCT01790932. Registered on 13 February 2013;NCT01629615. Registered on 27 June 2012.

The presence of disseminated tumor cells in breast cancer patient bone marrow aspirates predicts decreased recurrence-free survival. Although it is appreciated that physiologic, pathologic, and therapeutic conditions impact hematopoiesis, it remains unclear whether targeting hematopoiesis presents opportunities for limiting bone metastasis. Using preclinical breast cancer models, we discovered that marrow from mice treated with the bisphosphonate zoledronic acid (ZA) are metastasis-suppressive. Specifically, ZA modulated hematopoietic myeloid/osteoclast progenitor cell (M/OCP) lineage potential to activate metastasis-suppressive activity. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) promoted ZA resistance by redirecting M/OCP differentiation. We identified M/OCP and bone marrow transcriptional programs associated with metastasis suppression and ZA resistance. Analysis of patient blood samples taken at randomization revealed that women with high-plasma G-CSF experienced significantly worse outcome with adjuvant ZA than those with lower G-CSF levels. Our findings support discovery of therapeutic strategies to direct M/OCP lineage potential and biomarkers that stratify responses in patients at risk of recurrence. Significance: Bone marrow myeloid/osteoclast progenitor cell lineage potential has a profound impact on breast cancer bone metastasis and can be modulated by G-CSF and bone-targeting agents. Cancer Res; 78(18); 5300–14. ©2018 AACR.