Search

Background and Objectives Osteoarthritis (OA) is a major public health burden. While knee and hip joints are most commonly affected, the glenohumoral (shoulder) joint is also frequently involved. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety/tolerability of triamcinolone acetonide extended-release (TA-ER) and triamcinolone acetonide crystalline suspension (TAcs) in patients with shoulder OA. Methods In this phase 2, randomized, open-label, single-dose study (NCT03382262), adults with moderately-to-severely symptomatic shoulder OA for ≥ 6 months randomly received a single ultrasound-guided intra-articular (IA) injection of TA-ER 32 mg or TAcs 40 mg. Safety was evaluated throughout 12 weeks post-injection; blood samples for pharmacokinetic evaluations were collected pre-injection and through Day 85 post-injection. Results Among 25 randomized patients, 12 received TA-ER and 13 received TAcs. Most patients were female (60%), and all had moderate (72%) or severe (28%) shoulder OA. Adverse events (AEs) were reported by four (33%) patients following TA-ER and three (23%) following TAcs injection. No AE was serious or led to study discontinuation. Systemic exposure following TAcs was approximately 1.5-fold higher than that following TA-ER injection (geometric mean [GM] AUC0–last 873,543 vs 557,602 h × pg/mL). GM Cmax was also higher in TAcs- than TA-ER-treated patients (2034 vs 1283 pg/mL). Bioequivalence testing confirmed lower systemic TA exposure following TA-ER than TAcs IA injection. Conclusion These pharmacokinetic data confirm protracted release of TA from TA-ER following IA injection in patients with shoulder OA. Lower peak and systemic TA exposure following TA-ER suggests TA-ER could potentially confer an improved systemic safety profile over TAcs. Trial Registration Number NCT03382262 (December 22, 2017 retrospectively registered).

Intra-articular (IA) corticosteroids, including triamcinolone acetonide (TA), are a recommended treatment for hip osteoarthritis. We compared the safety and systemic exposure of TA extended-release (TA-ER) versus TA crystalline suspension (TAcs) in patients with hip osteoarthritis.In this phase 2, randomized, multicenter, open-label, single-dose study (NCT03382262), patients with hip osteoarthritis were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive single IA injections of TA-ER 32 mg or TAcs 40 mg. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis up to day 85. PK parameters included area under the concentration-time curve, total body drug clearance, maximum concentration (COf 30 patients (TA-ER: n = 15; TAcs: n = 15) randomized and included in the Safety Population, 25 patients were evaluated in the PK Population. TEAEs were reported in four of 15 (26.7%) patients who received TA-ER and in seven of 15 (46.7%) patients who received TAcs. The most common TEAEs included arthralgia and headache. All TEAEs were of grade 1 or 2 in severity. TA-ER produced substantially lower peak plasma TA concentrations compared with TAcs (CFollowing a single IA injection in the hip, TA-ER was generally well tolerated, with a safety profile comparable to that of TAcs. Systemic TA exposure was markedly lower in TA-ER-treated patients, consistent with the PK profile observed in knee osteoarthritis.gov identifier: NCT03382262.

A phase 3 randomized controlled study comparing triamcinolone acetonide extended-release (TA-ER) to conventional TA crystalline suspension (TAcs) reported variable efficacy results. Enrollment criteria may have contributed to this discrepancy, as moderate-to-severe average daily pain (ADP) was required at baseline, whereas no limitations were placed on Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC-A) pain severity. We conducted a post hoc sensitivity analysis to compare treatment effects in patients reporting moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis (OA) pain on both scales.Participants 40 years old with symptomatic knee OA were randomly assigned to a single intra-articular injection of TA-ER 32 mg, TAcs 40 mg, or saline-placebo and followed for 24 weeks. Patient-reported ADP, WOMAC-A, rescue medication usage, and adverse events (AEs) were assessed. Participants who reported moderate-to-severe OA pain at baseline using both instruments (ADP ≥ 5 to ≤ 9, maximum 10 and WOMAC-A ≥ 2, maximum 4) were categorized as "concordant" pain reporters; patients with baseline moderate-to-severe OA on ADP only were termed "discordant" pain reporters.Two-hundred-ninety-two concordant pain reporters of 484 total subjects received TA-ER 32 mg (n = 95), TAcs 40 mg (n = 100), or saline-placebo (n = 97). Baseline characteristics and AE profiles of the concordant and discordant pain responders were consistent with the full analysis population. Among concordant pain reporters, TA-ER significantly (p 0.05) improved ADP scores vs. TAcs (weeks 5-19; area-under-the-effect [AUE]In patients reporting moderate-to-severe knee OA pain at baseline based on concordant ADP and WOMAC-A scores, TA-ER provided statistically significant pain relief for ≥ 12 weeks compared with conventional TAcs.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02357459.Osteoarthritis is a chronic condition that greatly impacts patients. Pain is the most common symptom of osteoarthritis. Clinical trials evaluating the effects of new drugs to treat osteoarthritis pain frequently use scales to rate overall pain following treatment. Patients may rate their pain using a number that best describes their pain, with the lowest number typically meaning “no pain,” and the highest number typically meaning “pain as bad as you can imagine.” Other rating scales may be used to rate pain in situations commonly associated with osteoarthritis.Results from a large clinical trial demonstrated that injection of an extended-release steroid significantly reduced pain compared with a conventional steroid injection on only one of the two pain-reporting scales used in the trial. A closer look found that some patients reported their pain differently on the two rating scales at the start of the trial, with some reporting moderate-to-severe pain using one questionnaire and mild pain using the other. Here, we focused on those patients who reported having moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis knee pain on both pain scales at the start and found that the pain relief benefit associated with the extended-release steroid injection was greatly improved compared with the conventional steroid injection with both measures. Patients receiving the extended-release steroid injection also decreased their use of rescue medication for pain relief.

Introduction Osteoarthritis (OA) is common and its prevalence is increased in military service members. In a phase 3 randomized controlled trial (NCT02357459), a single intra-articular injection of an extended-release formulation of triamcinolone acetonide (TA-ER) in participants with unilateral or bilateral knee OA demonstrated substantial improvement in pain and symptoms. Bilateral knee pain has emerged as a confounding factor in clinical trials when evaluating the effect of a single intra-articular injection. Furthermore, unilateral disease is frequently first to emerge in active military personnel secondary to prior traumatic joint injury. In this post hoc analysis, we assessed efficacy and safety of TA-ER in a subgroup of participants with unilateral knee OA. Methods Participants ≥ 40 years of age with symptomatic knee OA were randomized to a single intra-articular injection of TA-ER 32 mg, TA crystalline suspension (TAcs) 40 mg, or saline-placebo. Average daily pain (ADP)-intensity and rescue medication use were collected at each of weeks 1–24 postinjection; Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)-A (pain), WOMAC-B (stiffness), WOMAC-C (function), and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Quality of Life (KOOS-QoL) were collected at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 postinjection. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed throughout the study. Participants with unilateral knee OA were selected for this analysis. Results Of 170 participants with unilateral OA (TA-ER, N = 51; saline-placebo, N = 60; TAcs, N = 59), 42% were male and 89% were white. TA-ER significantly (p

Introduction The aim of this work is to assess the safety and efficacy of repeat administration of triamcinolone acetonide extended-release (TA–ER) in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA), including those with advanced radiographic severity. Methods In this phase 3b, single-arm, open-label study, patients aged ≥ 40 years received the first intra-articular TA-ER injection on day 1. Patients received the second injection timed to the response to the first injection (at either week 12, 16, 20, or 24). Patients who received two injections were evaluated every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. Safety was evaluated via treatment-emergent adverse events and any change at 52 weeks in index-knee radiographs (chondrolysis, osteonecrosis, insufficiency fractures, subchondral bone changes). Exploratory efficacy endpoints included Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)-A (pain), -B (stiffness), -C (function), and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Quality of Life (KOOS-QoL) after each injection. Initiative in Methods, Measurements and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT) criteria were used to determine moderate and substantial treatment response. Results A total of 208 patients were enrolled and received the first injection of TA-ER; 179 (86.1%) received the second injection (median time to second injection: 16.6 weeks). Both injections were well tolerated, with no unexpected adverse events or significant radiographic changes at week 52. The magnitude and duration of clinical benefit after the first and second injections were similar, and most patients reported a substantial (≥ 50%) analgesic response after both doses. Conclusions Repeat administration of TA–ER using a flexible dosing schedule timed to patient response was well tolerated, with no radiographic evidence of cartilage impact. Both injections resulted in similar improvements in OA symptoms across a broad spectrum of disease severity reflective of that seen in clinical practice. Trial Registration Information ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03046446. Funding Flexion Therapeutics, Inc. Plain Language Summary Plain language summary available for this article. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s40744-019-0140-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Objectives: Triamcinolone acetonide extended-release (TA-ER) is approved in the US to treat pain associated with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Intra-articular corticosteroids (IACS) are often used to manage recurrence of pain and symptoms during the prolonged course of OA. Effectiveness of IACS in advanced knee OA is unknown, and lack of effective nonoperative treatments may accelerate consideration of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This post hoc subgroup analysis of a Phase 3b, single-arm, open-label study (NCT03046446) evaluated the efficacy of initial and repeat administration TA ER in knee OA with a range of radiographic severity classified by Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade. Methods: Patients aged ≥40 years with symptomatic knee OA for ≥6 months, KL Grade 2-4, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) -A (pain) total sum score ≥6, and index knee pain for >15 days during the prior month received the 1st injection of TA-ER on Day 1. Patients received the 2nd injection at the first visit (Week 12, 16, 20, or 24) at which repeat dose criteria were met (ie, patient benefited from and tolerated the 1st injection without safety concerns and was clinically indicated to receive the 2nd injection). Patients who received 2 injections were evaluated every 4 weeks up to 52 weeks after the 1st injection. Patients who did not benefit from the 1st injection at Week 12 completed at Week 12. Patients who did not meet repeat dose criteria by Week 24 completed at Week 24. Safety was evaluated via treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and by index-knee radiography at end of study. Exploratory efficacy endpoints included WOMAC A (pain), -B (stiffness), C (function), and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Quality of Life following each injection. Results: Of 208 enrolled patients, 179 received 2 injections. Of these, 56 (31.3%) had KL Grade 2, 68 (38.0%) had KL Grade 3, and 55 (30.7%) had KL Grade 4. The patient population reflected the ‘real-world’ knee OA population (Table). Demographics and baseline disease characteristics were generally similar across KL grade subgroups; however, as expected, age and time since OA diagnosis increased with KL grade. Prior index-knee OA treatments did not correlate with KL grade except for increased use of IA hyaluronic acid. The incidence of TEAEs and index-knee TEAEs were similar across KL grades (Table). Most TEAEs were Grade 1 or Grade 2 and there were no unexpected TEAEs. There were no indications of chondrolysis, osteonecrosis, subchondral insufficiency fractures, or clinically significant subchondral bone changes in any subgroup. Response rates for the 1st injection and median times to 2nd injection were 95% and 120 days for KL Grade 4, 96% and 118 days for KL Grade 3 and 94% and 113 days for KL Grade 2. Regardless of KL grade, mean WOMAC-A (pain) scores were comparable following injections (Figure). At 12 weeks after both the 1st and 2nd injections, mean scores were similar for patients with KL Grade 4 (1.34 and 1.36), KL Grade 3 (1.37 each), and KL Grade 2 (1.24 and 1.20) (Figure). Conclusion: Overall and across baseline KL grades, repeat administration of TA-ER using a dosing schedule tailored to patient response was well tolerated, with no radiographic evidence for an impact on cartilage. In this ‘real-world’ patient population, TA-ER reliably reduced OA symptoms with similar improvements observed after both injections across KL grade subgroups, including those with KL Grade 4 who may otherwise be considering TKA. [Table: see text][Figure: see text]

Mucopolysaccharidosis IIIB is caused by a marked decrease in N-acetyl-α-d-glucosaminidase (NAGLU) enzyme activity, which leads to the accumulation of heparan sulfate in key organs, progressive brain atrophy, and neurocognitive decline. In this open-label study, 11 eligible patients aged 2 to12 years (developmental age ≥ 1 year) were sequentially allocated to recombinant human NAGLU enzyme (SBC-103) in 3 staggered- and escalating-dose groups (0.3 mg/kg [n = 3], 1.0 mg/kg [n = 4], or 3.0 mg/kg [n = 4]) by intravenous infusion every 2 weeks for 24 weeks, followed by a 4-week interruption (Part A), treatment at 1.0 and/or 3.0 mg/kg every 2 weeks starting at week 28 (Part B), and treatment at 5.0 or 10.0 mg/kg every 2 weeks (Part C) for approximately 2 total years in the study. The primary objective of the study was safety and tolerability evaluation; secondary objectives included evaluation of SBC-103 effects on total heparan sulfate levels in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), brain structural magnetic resonance imaging (cortical gray matter volume), and neurocognitive status (age equivalent/developmental quotient). During the study, 13 treatment-emergent serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred in 3 patients; 32 infusion-associated reactions (IARs) occurred in 8 patients. Most AEs were mild and intravenous treatment with SBC-103 was well tolerated. Mean (SD) changes from baseline at 52 weeks in Part C for the 5.0 and 10.0 mg/kg doses, respectively, were: -4.7% (8.3) and - 4.7% (14.7) for heparan sulfate levels in CSF, -8.1% (3.5) and - 10.3% (9.4) for cortical gray matter volume, +2.3 (6.9) points and +1.0 (9.2) points in cognitive age equivalent and -8.9 (10.2) points and -14.4 (9.2) points in developmental quotient. In summary, SBC-103 was generally well tolerated. Changes in heparan sulfate levels in CSF were small and were not maintained from earlier study time points, there was no clear evidence overall of clinically meaningful improvement in neurocognitive function at the higher doses investigated, and no dose-dependent effects were observed.

Background: Intra-articular corticosteroids are commonly used for pain relief in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Simultaneous intra-articular corticosteroid (CS) knee injections may be beneficial for the ~80–90% of patients who present with, or develop, bilateral knee osteoarthritis, but concurrent injections may increase systemic CS exposure and data on safety/tolerability are lacking. Triamcinolone acetonide extended release (TA-ER) has shown decreased systemic triamcinolone acetonide exposure compared with traditional triamcinolone acetonide crystalline suspension (TAcs) after a single knee injection in patients with knee osteoarthritis. This phase IIa study was designed to assess the safety and systemic triamcinolone acetonide exposure following injections of TA-ER or TAcs into each knee of patients with bilateral knee osteoarthritis. Methods: Patients (⩾40 years) meeting American College of Rheumatology criteria for knee osteoarthritis in both knees received concurrent single intra-articular injections of TA-ER 32 mg or TAcs 40 mg into each knee (total: 64 mg and 80 mg, respectively) and were followed for 6 weeks. Safety was evaluated based on treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected pre-injection, and at the following postinjection time points: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 h, and days 8, 15, 29, and 43. Results: Baseline characteristics were balanced between patients randomly assigned to TA-ER ( n = 12) or TAcs ( n = 12). Both treatments were well tolerated with comparable TEAE profiles. Peak plasma triamcinolone acetonide concentrations (Cmax) were lower following bilateral TA-ER injections [geometric mean, 2277.7 pg/ml (95% CI, 1602.13–3238.04)] compared with bilateral TAcs injections [7394.7 pg/ml (2201.06–24,843.43)], with median times to Cmax (Tmax) of 4.5 and 6.5 h, respectively. Conclusions: In patients with bilateral knee osteoarthritis, intra-articular injection of TA-ER into both knees was well tolerated. Consistent with pharmacokinetic profiles observed after a single knee injection, plasma triamcinolone acetonide concentrations were lower after bilateral TA-ER injections compared with the higher and more variable concentrations observed after bilateral TAcs injections. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03378076

Background— Myocarditis is a cause of a new-onset dilated cardiomyopathy phenotype in children, with small studies reporting high rates of recovery of left ventricular (LV) function. Methods and Results— The presenting characteristics and outcomes of children with myocarditis diagnosed clinically and with biopsy confirmation (n=119) or with probable myocarditis diagnosed clinically or by biopsy alone (n=253) were compared with children with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (n=1123). Characteristics at presentation were assessed as possible predictors of outcomes. The distributions of time to death, transplantation, and echocardiographic normalization in the biopsy-confirmed myocarditis and probable myocarditis groups did not differ ( P ≥0.5), but both groups differed significantly from the idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy group (all P ≤0.003). In children with myocarditis, lower LV fractional shortening z -score at presentation predicted greater mortality (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.73 to 0.98; P =0.03) and greater LV posterior wall thickness predicted transplantation (hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.02 to 1.35; P =0.03). In those with decreased LV fractional shortening at presentation, independent predictors of echocardiographic normalization were presentation with an LV end-diastolic dimension z -score >2 (hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.22 to 0.58; P P =0.04). Conclusions— Children with biopsy-confirmed or probable myocarditis had similar proportions of death, transplantation, and echocardiographic normalization 3 years after presentation and better outcomes than those of children with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. In children with myocarditis who had impaired LV ejection at presentation, rates of echocardiographic normalization were greater in those without LV dilation and in those with greater septal wall thickness at presentation. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00005391.

Background— In patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, the magnitude of cardiac remodeling often correlates with the clinical severity of heart failure. We sought to determine whether measures of left ventricular (LV) dilation and systolic dysfunction in children with dilated cardiomyopathy at the time of listing for cardiac transplantation are associated with survival while waiting for and early after transplant. Methods and Results— We analyzed echocardiographic data obtained within 6 months of listing for heart transplant and clinical data from 261 children with dilated cardiomyopathy who were included in both the Pediatric Cardiomyopathy Registry and the Pediatric Heart Transplant Study. Median time to listing after diagnosis was 1.9 months and to transplant after listing was 0.8 months. There were 42 deaths (29 waiting and 13 within 6 months after transplant). We found a significant age-dependent association of LV end-diastolic dimension z score (n=204, 31 deaths) with death controlling for race, transplant status, and medical insurance. The association was strongest for infants younger than 6 months at diagnosis (hazard ratio 1.47, P =0.008) and was not significant in children older than 5 years at diagnosis. A similar interaction was identified between age and LV end-systolic dimension z score ( P =0.04). Neither LV function nor mass was associated with death, overall, or in subgroups. Conclusions— The severity of LV dilation at listing for heart transplant is associated with outcome in infants and young children with dilated cardiomyopathy, whereas the severity of LV systolic dysfunction is not. These findings should be considered in risk stratification of these children at listing.