Search

Legionnaires' disease is pneumonia, usually caused by Legionella pneumophila, which can range in severity from mild to quite severe. While it is commonly acquired in the community, it can just as easily be acquired nosocomially from water sources that have not been appropriately decontaminated. While historically initial treatment was always with erythromycin, current case series and treatment recommendations suggest that outpatients receive immediate treatment with one of the following antibacterials: azithromycin, erythromycin, clarithromycin, telithromycin, doxycycline or an extended-spectrum fluoroquinolone. If the symptoms are severe enough to warrant hospitalisation then the patient should receive treatment with parenteral azithromycin or extended-spectrum fluoroquinolones followed by step-down to oral formulations to complete the regimens. While a shorter course of 7-10 days for more severe infections may be possible for intravenous/oral azithromycin, other antibacterials should be administered for a total of 10-21 days and started as soon as possible upon presentation to optimise outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The primary objective of this study was to characterize the extent of excretion of garenoxacin, a novel des-F(6)-quinolone antimicrobial, into the breast milk of lactating women. A secondary objective was to determine the time after dose administration that garenoxacin was no longer detected in breast milk so as to define when a mother may resume breastfeeding if it was interrupted for garenoxacin administration. Six healthy, lactating women (age [mean +/- SD]: 32 +/- 6 years; weight: 68.3 +/- 19.8 kg; body mass index: 26 +/- 5 kg/m(2)) who had completed weaning their infants were administered a single 600-mg oral dose of garenoxacin. Plasma samples were collected predose and repeatedly up to 72 hours postdose. Breast milk was collected predose and for 6- to 12-hour intervals repeatedly up to 120 hours postdose. Breast milk/plasma concentration ratios for garenoxacin ranged from 0.35 to 0.44 up to 24 hours postdose, and the mean peak breast milk concentration was 3.0 microg/mL (0- to 6-h collection interval). Overall, garenoxacin exposure in breast milk was minimal, with a mean of 0.07% of the administered dose recovered within 120 hours. Indeed, garenoxacin was undetectable in the breast milk of a majority of subjects within 84 hours of dosing. As such, an infant nursing from a mother who had received a single 600-mg oral dose of garenoxacin could theoretically be exposed to 0.42 mg of garenoxacin (0.105 mg/kg/day for a 4-kg infant over the period of 5 days of nursing). If extrapolated to a 14-day course of garenoxacin 600 mg once daily, total exposure would be approximately 5.88 mg. These findings indicate that, like other quinolone antimicrobials, garenoxacin is secreted in breast milk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Previous studies have demonstrated that the chelation interactions demonstrated between fluoroquinolones and antacids also occur when they are coadministered with mineral-fortified foods. This study was conducted to evaluate the bioequivalence of levofloxacin when administered in a fasting state as compared to when it was administered with a common breakfast of calcium-fortified orange juice and ready-to-eat cereal. Fourteen of 16 healthy volunteers completed this study and received 500 mg of levofloxacin with each of the following: (1) 12 ounces of water, (2) subject-measured portions of juice and cereal, and (3) subject-measured portions of juice and cereal with milk. Plasma samples were collected prior to dosing and for up to 48 hours after. The results demonstrated that neither fed phase was bioequivalent to the fasting arm in terms of Cmax (with milk, 79.2% [72.6%, 85.7%]; without milk, 79.1% [73.3%, 84.9%]). In addition, a weak correlation was identified between the amount of change in 24-hour exposure and mineral fortification. The results of this study further demonstrate a need to require additional fed-fasted bioequivalence studies for drugs that demonstrate no interaction with the FDA meal but have significant interactions with drugs or supplements that contain large amounts of multivalent ions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pharmacodynamics, the relationship between drug exposure and physiologic effect, helps to differentiate the killing activity of antibiotic classes through various markers of outcome. Antibiotics are characterized by time-dependent or concentration-dependent bacterial killing activity. With antibiotic therapy, pharmacodynamics consists of an intricate relationship between drug exposure, bacterial susceptibility, and the antimicrobial effect of the drug. Due to increasing reports of resistance, many investigators and healthcare institutions are focused on the optimal use of antibiotic therapy. Studies on antimicrobial pharmacodynamics have been increasing in the hope of defining and establishing break points that are associated with various outcome markers to optimize therapy, but the application of these studies in clinical practice is still limited. Incorporating pharmacodynamics into the study of antibiotic therapy can enhance the design of rational and optimal dosing regimens and improve the understanding of the emergence of resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chelation interactions between drugs/supplements that contain large amounts of multivalent ions and the fluoroquinolones have been known for quite some time. However, there has been a lack of taking this interaction into account when they may be coadministered with foods that have been fortified with amounts of multiple multivalent ions that equal or exceed many supplement products. A previous study demonstrated that 12 ounces of calcium-fortified orange juice significantly decreased the bioequivalence of a dose of ciprofloxacin. This study examined, in 16 healthy volunteers, whether 12 ounces of orange juice with and without calcium fortification would demonstrate the same chelation interaction with single doses of levofloxacin. The results of the study demonstrated that both types of juice decreased levofloxacin Cmax values by 14% to 18% and prolonged tmax values by approximately 50%, with calcium-fortified orange juice decreasing Cmax enough to lose bioequivalence as compared to the control arm (89% [78.1%, 99.8%]). Due to the lack of change in overall exposure, it is thought that rather than a chelation interaction, levofloxacin and components of the orange juices competed for intestinal transport mechanisms such as P-glycoprotein and organic anion-transporting polypeptides, which resulted in the discovered interaction. These results further confirm the need to adjust regulatory studies to include bioequivalence/bioavailability studies that contain fortified foods more than high-calorie/high-fat foods to better reflect current American consumption habits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Previous work has demonstrated that the chelation interaction seen with ciprofloxacin when it is coadministered with antacids also happens when it is coadministered with calcium-fortified foods. This study was conducted to study whether this was a drug-specific finding or whether the interaction occurs with other members of the fluoroquinolone class of drugs. Sixteen healthy volunteers received single 400-mg oral doses of gatifloxacin with 12 ounces each of water, nonfortified orange juice, and calcium-fortified orange juice and had plasma samples drawn for assay over the subsequent 48 hours. Results demonstrated significant increases in total oral clearance (15%) and volume of distribution (13%) along with a matching significant decrease (12%) in exposure (AUC) when gatifloxacin was taken with the fortified juice. Although not statistically significant, peak concentrations decreased by 15% and were reached (tmax) approximately 38% later when gatifloxacin was coadministered with the calcium-fortified juice. Bioavailability testing indicated that although the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratio of the geometric means of the calcium-fortified juice and water arms' AUC stayed within the range of 80% to 125%, those for Cmax did not. This study demonstrated a chelation or adsorption interaction between the fortified juice and gatifloxacin that reached regulatory significance. As a result, clinicians may wish to instruct patients to take gatifloxacin either with nonfortified foods or on an empty stomach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Fluoroquinolones are known to interact with drugs containing multivalent ions. Current Food and Drug Administration (FDA) labeling states that ciprofloxacin and most other fluoroquinolones are safe to be given with food and dietary calcium but not calcium supplements. Although many of the currently marketed calcium fortified foods have calcium contents that usually exceed those in dietary calcium sources, it is unclear whether they represent a risk for less than optimal absorption of fluoroquinolones, which may result in subsequent clinical failures due to lack of bacterial eradication and antibiotic resistance. The purpose of this three-way, randomized, crossover study was to characterize and compare the bioequivalence of single doses of oral ciprofloxacin in 15 healthy volunteers when administered with water, concurrently with orange juice, and concurrently with calcium-fortified orange juice. Compared to the control arm, the Cmax of ciprofloxacin significantly decreased when it was given with orange juice (23%, p = 0.001) and with calcium-fortified orange juice (41%, p < 0.001). Twenty-four-hour ciprofloxacin AUCs were also decreased for both forms of the orange juice (22% [p < 0.001] and 38% [p < 0.001], respectively). When compared to each other, neither of the orange juice regimens were bioequivalent to each other, with the Cmax and AUC for the fortified form being 22% (p = 0.005) and 21% (p = 0.015) lower than those of the nonfortified form. By FDA standards, although ciprofloxacin is marginally bioequivalent when administered with orange juice, it is not when it is administered with calcium-fortified orange juice. The changes in Cmax and AUC have the potential to significantly decrease clinical efficacy and promote antibiotic resistance. Not warning patients about potential food-drug interactions with fortified foods may be a major unrealized and unstudied inadvertent source of clinical failures and resistance trends with fluoroquinolones. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atorvastatin is a common option among the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors for the treatment of lipid disorders because of its excellent lipid-lowering efficacy and overall safety profile. Although these agents can rarely cause rhabdomyolysis by themselves, macrolides, among other agents, have been demonstrated to increase the likelihood of this via inhibition of CYP metabolism of the lipid agent. This study investigated the potential for azithromycin and clarithromycin to inhibit the metabolism of atorvastatin. Although there was no interaction between azithromycin and atorvastatin, clarithromycin did have a significant effect on atorvastatin pharmacokinetic parameters. When coadministered, clarithromycin raised subject exposure (AUC24) by 82% and peak plasma concentrations by 56%. These data suggest that while azithromycin appears to be safe to coadminister with atorvastatin, clarithromycin should be avoided in patients taking this and similarly metabolized HMG-CoA inhibitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In response to consumers' increased interest in preventive health care, the food industry is producing a variety of foods fortified with calcium, iron, and other minerals and vitamins. This well-meaning idea of food fortification is troubling in the context of clinical pharmacology. The recommended Food and Drug Administration (FDA) meal used in food-drug interaction studies is a high-fat, high-calorie meal with little nutritive value. While some drugs may appear to be safe when taken with food, this may not be true when fortified foods are considered. The mechanisms causing drug-fortified food interactions are the some well-known mechanisms that cause other drug-mineral interactions. Certain drugs may exhibit decreased absorption due to chelation and adsorption. Other drugs may have decreased absorption or increased excretion due to changes in gastric and/or urinary pH. The results of such interactions may be clinically insignificant or severe, including treatment failure, frequent dose changes, antibiotic resistance, and increased morbidity and mortality. Revisions of current regulatoryguidelines are necessary to take into account this potentially major source of 'new' drug interactions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Twelve healthy volunteers were enrolled in an open-label, randomized, crossover study. Subjects received single doses of theophylline (t mg/kg) alone and after a 10 day course of dirithromycin (two 250 mg tablets od). The study phases were separated by a 3 week washout period. Serum samples were collected before and for 24 h after theophylline doses. Serum theophylline concentrations were measured via a validated immunoassay system and the data were modelled via noncompartmental analysis. When the control phase (i.e. no dirithromycin) was compared with the treatment phase (i.e. with dirithromycin), theophylline exposures as measured by AUC0→∞ were not significantly different: 141.7 ± 25.9 and 136.4 ± 33.1 mg[sdot ]h/L respectively (P = 0.16). No significant changes in other theophylline pharmacokinetic parameters were evident. These results indicate that theophylline can be safely co-administered with dirithromycin, [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Background: A recent drug interaction study reported that when azithromycin was administered with the combination of ivermectin and albendazole, there were modest increases in ivermectin pharmacokinetic parameters. Data from this study were reanalyzed to further explore this observation. A compartmental model was developed and 1,000 interaction studies were simulated to explore extreme high ivermectin values that might occur., Methods and Findings: A two-compartment pharmacokinetic model with first-order elimination and absorption was developed. The chosen final model had 7 fixed-effect parameters and 8 random-effect parameters. Because some of the modeling parameters and their variances were not distributed normally, a second mixture model was developed to further explore these data. The mixture model had two additional fixed parameters and identified two populations, A (55% of subjects), where there was no change in bioavailability, and B (45% of subjects), where ivermectin bioavailability was increased 37%. Simulations of the data using both models were similar, and showed that the highest ivermectin concentrations fell in the range of 115-201 ng/mL., Conclusions: This is the first pharmacokinetic model of ivermectin. It demonstrates the utility of two modeling approaches to explore drug interactions, especially where there may be population heterogeneity. The mechanism for the interaction was identified (an increase in bioavailability in one subpopulation). Simulations show that the maximum ivermectin exposures that might be observed during co-administration with azithromycin are below those previously shown to be safe and well tolerated. These analyses support further study of co-administration of azithromycin with the widely used agents ivermectin and albendazole, under field conditions in disease control programs.

Azithromycin is a critical component of an integrated disease elimination program against trachoma. This study was conducted to evaluate whether azithromycin has a pharmacokinetic interaction with the combination of ivermectin and albendazole. Eighteen healthy volunteers were administered single doses of azithromycin, ivermectin/albendazole, and the combination of the three agents in random, crossover fashion. To assess the presence of interactions, test (combination) and reference (single dose) data were compared using an estimation approach. Compared with reference phases, the geometric mean values for the combination arm's azithromycin AUC(0-t) and C(max) were increased approximately 13% and 20%, respectively, albendazole AUC(0-t) decreased by approximately 3% and C(max) increased approximately 3%, and ivermectin AUC(0-t) and C(max) were increased 31% and 27%, respectively. Albendazole sulfoxide AUC(0-t) and C(max) were decreased approximately 16% and 14%, respectively. All treatments were well tolerated. The interactions for azithromycin and albendazole were minimal although the increase in ivermectin exposure requires further study.

Pediatric and adult community-acquired respiratory tract infections remain some of the most common reasons for visits to primary care practitioners, and the antibiotics used to treat them are historically highly profitable for their manufacturers. Despite these facts and the continued evolving need for new treatments for these infections, virtually no new agents have been developed in the past decade. This review explores some regulatory guidelines that could potentially explain the dearth of development, and it provides some practical answers for resolving them.

Antibiotic therapy is of clinical benefit in certain patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). In this randomised, investigator-blinded, multicentre trial, azithromycin (500mg once a day (qd) for 3 days) was compared with moxifloxacin (400mg qd for 5 days) for the treatment of outpatients with AECB (forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV(1)) >35%). Of 342 patients randomised to either treatment, 169 received azithromycin and 173 received moxifloxacin. The mean age in the azithromycin and moxifloxacin groups was 56.4 years and 55.5 years, respectively. In the intent-to-treat analysis, clinical success rates for azithromycin and moxifloxacin were comparable at Days 10-12 (90% versus 90%, respectively) and Days 22-26 (81% versus 82%, respectively). Among patients who were culture-positive at baseline for Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis or Haemophilus parainfluenzae, clinical efficacy for azithromycin versus moxifloxacin at Days 10-12 was 93% versus 84%, respectively, and at Days 22-26 it was 89% versus 73%, respectively. The incidence of at least one treatment-related adverse event (AE) in the azithromycin and moxifloxacin groups was 18.3% and 19.1%, respectively. The most common AEs were diarrhoea, nausea, abdominal pain and vaginitis. Most treatment-related AEs were of mild or moderate severity, with no serious treatment-related AEs. One subject in the moxifloxacin group discontinued treatment owing to a treatment-related AE (precordial pain and dry throat). Compliance with both regimens was >90%. Three-day azithromycin and 5-day moxifloxacin demonstrate comparable efficacy and safety for the treatment of AECB in outpatients.

Background: Levofloxacin is used in adult patients with cystic fibrosis but its pharmacokinetics is not well characterized in this population. Patients with cystic fibrosis use calcium routinely to prevent osteoporosis. A slower intestinal transit time is common in cystic fibrosis implying that the standard 2-h spacing of minerals and levofloxacin to prevent a chelation interaction may be insufficient. The objectives of this study were to characterize the steady state pharmacokinetics of oral levofloxacin 750 mg with and without 2-h spaced calcium carbonate in patients with cystic fibrosis compared to matched healthy volunteers., Methods: In an open-label, randomized, cross-over study of five patients with cystic fibrosis and five age, sex, race, and serum creatinine matched healthy volunteers received 750 mg of oral levofloxacin alone daily for 5 days and the same dose of levofloxacin with 2-h spaced calcium carbonate supplementation 500 mg po thrice daily with meals in random sequence. Blood was collected for plasma assay of levofloxacin pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24h after the fifth levofloxacin dose., Results: There was no significant interaction in healthy volunteers, however, when cystic fibrosis patients were given levofloxacin with 2-h spaced calcium, the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) decreased by 19% and time to Cmax increased by 37% (p<0.05). This difference in peak concentrations resulted in a lack of bioequivalence (Cmax geometric mean ratio 81.6%, 90% confidence intervals: 71.8%, 91.4%) even when levofloxacin and calcium supplements were spaced by the standard 2h administration instruction in patients with cystic fibrosis., Conclusions: These results indicate that multivalent cations such as calcium should be maximally separated from oral levofloxacin administration in adult patients with cystic fibrosis to prevent this drug interaction, thereby better optimizing antibiotic efficacy and decreasing the potential for resistance development.

Objective: To examine the clinical aspects of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and the efficacy and safety of interferon gamma-1b (IFNgamma-1b) in its treatment., Data Sources: Epidemiologic, preclinical, and clinical studies published in the English language were identified by a MEDLINE search (1966-January 2005) using the search terms idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis, and interferon. Additional citations were identified from the reference lists of related publications., Study Selection and Data Extraction: Selected preclinical studies describing the pathophysiologic basis for IFNgamma-1b therapy and all clinical studies were included. Additional trials describing other treatment modalities and the determinants of response to therapy in patients with IPF were also reviewed., Data Synthesis: IFNgamma-1b targets the fibrotic rather than inflammatory processes of IPF. The efficacy of IFNgamma-1b in patients with IPF is inconsistent with regard to changes in pulmonary function and mortality, although a modest survival benefit was observed in the largest clinical trial. Adverse events related to IFNgamma-1b are frequent although transient. Several cases of respiratory failure occurring subsequent to the administration of IFNgamma-1b are documented., Conclusions: To date, although trials suggest that earlier-stage IPF may be responsive to IFNgamma-1b, study results overall are inconsistent; further investigation is needed.

Introduction: Bronchiectasis is a chronic pulmonary process characterized by recurrent respiratory infections leading to destruction of airways secondary to inflammation. We investigated whether the addition of 6-months' twice-weekly azithromycin to the existing treatment regimen in patients with pulmonary bronchiectasis decreased the number of exacerbations and improved pulmonary function compared with a similar period of time without concurrent azithromycin., Methods: Thirty patients with high-resolution computed tomography scan-confirmed bronchiectasis were to be recruited. In random order, patients received usual medications for 6 months, and usual medications plus oral azithromycin 500mg twice weekly for 6 months. Patients receiving azithromycin first had a 1-month washout period prior to entering the second phase. Patients recorded weekly peak flow (PF) measurements. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs), 24-hour sputum volume, and needs for intervention with medication or ancillary support were collected at baseline and every 3 months. Exacerbation incidence and sputum volume measurements were compared from baseline to the end of each study phase., Results: Twelve patients were enrolled; 11 were included in the analysis. Owing to randomization, most patients received the azithromycin first, which was fairly well tolerated. PFTs did not change significantly during either study phase and PFs appeared to remain stable during azithromycin therapy and throughout the subsequent control phase. Azithromycin significantly decreased the incidence of exacerbations compared with usual medications (5 vs 16; p = 0.019). Mean 24-hour sputum volume significantly decreased (15% [p = 0.005]) during the active treatment phase, and remained decreased during the control phase (p = 0.028). Subjectively, patients reported increased energy and quality of life while receiving treatment with azithromycin., Conclusions: The addition of twice-weekly azithromycin significantly decreased the incidence of exacerbation and 24-hour sputum volume and may have stabilized the PFTs and PFs in this 11-patient pilot study. The results of this study justify further investigation of adding azithromycin to the treatment regimens of patients with bronchiectasis for its disease-modifying effects.

Background: It has been recognized for more than 20 years that the macrolides have immunomodulatory effects that are beneficial for those suffering from chronic pulmonary inflammatory syndromes, such as diffuse panbronchiolitis, cystic fibrosis, asthma and bronchiectasis. The macrolides have consistently been associated with decreased length of stay and mortality when used alone or in combination with beta-lactam antibiotics. This effect can be demonstrated against combinations consisting of beta-lactams and other antibiotics active against 'atypical chest pathogens' when treating community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in hospitalized patients. As such, it appears that the macrolides' effects in CAP patients are more than just antibacterial in nature. AIMS OF THIS REVIEW: This review aims: to give the reader information on the background areas described, as well as related areas; to review the CAP benefits with macrolides and how they may be related to the immunomodulatory properties they demonstrate, albeit in a shorter period of time than previously demonstrated with chronic pulmonary disorders; to use ex vivo data to support these extrapolations., Literature Search: A literature search using Medline was conducted from 1966 onwards, searching for articles with relevant key words such as macrolide, diffuse panbronchiolitis, community-acquired pneumonia, biofilm, immunomodulation, cystic fibrosis, erythromycin, clarithromycin, roxithromycin and azithromycin, bronchiectasis and asthma. When appropriate, additional references were found from the bibliographies of identified papers of interest. Any relevant scientific conference proceedings or medical texts were checked when necessary., Conclusions: (1) Research into macrolide immunomodulation for chronic pulmonary disorders demonstrates consistent positive effects, although of types other than seen with diffuse panbronchiolitis. These effects, together with their inhibitory activity on biofilms, have the potential to make them a useful option. (2) The benefits for CAP are consistent, and higher when a macrolide is given with another atypical agent than if the other atypical agent is given alone, suggesting a non-antibacterial benefit. (3) Recent research of the immunomodulatory properties of azithromycin imply that azithromycin may have a previously unknown short-term biphasic effect on inflammation modulation: enhancement of host defence mechanisms shortly after initial administration followed by curtailment of local infection/inflammation in the following period. (4) Additional in vivo research is needed prior to developing any firm conclusions.

Study Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of oral azithromycin 500 mg once daily for 3 days with those of oral clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for 10 days., Design: Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter study., Setting: Seventy-six study centers in eight countries (Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Costa Rica, India, South Africa, and USA)., Patients: Three hundred and twenty-two adult outpatients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB) as documented by increased cough or sputum production, worsening dyspnea, and purulent sputum production., Interventions: Randomization 1 : 1 to azithromycin 500 mg once daily for 3 days or clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for 10 days., Results: The primary efficacy endpoint was clinical response at day 21-24, or test of cure (TOC) visit in the modified intent-to-treat (MITT) analysis (n = 318 patients). The TOC clinical cure rates in the MITT population were equivalent in the two treatment groups at 85% with azithromycin and 82% with clarithromycin (95% CI -5.9%, 12.0%). Clinical success rates on day 10-12 were also equivalent at 93% with azithromycin and 94% with clarithromycin (95% CI -7.9%, 4.4%). Clinical cure rates at TOC by pathogen were equivalent for the two treatment groups for Haemophilus influenzae (azithromycin, 85.7%; clarithromycin, 87.5%), Moraxella catarrhalis (91.7% and 80.0%, respectively) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (90.6% and 77.8%, respectively). Bacteriologic success rates were also equivalent between the azithromycin and clarithromycin treatment groups at TOC for S. pneumoniae (90.6% and 85.2%, respectively), H. influenzae (71.4% and 81.3%, respectively) and M. catarrhalis (100% and 86.7%, respectively). The overall incidence of treatment-related adverse events was similar in the azithromycin and clarithromycin groups (20.9% and 26.8%, respectively), with the most common being abdominal pain (6.3% and 6.1%, respectively), diarrhea (4.4% and 5.5%, respectively), and nausea (4.4% and 3.7%, respectively)., Conclusions: Three-day treatment with azithromycin 500 mg once daily is equivalent to a 10-day treatment with clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily in adult patients with AECB.

Objective: To describe the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety data of the use of single-dose azithromycin for respiratory tract infections in children and adults., Data Sources: A MEDLINE search (1990-September 2003) was performed to identify all pertinent studies and review articles. When appropriate information was not available in the literature, data were obtained from the product manufacturers or abstracts from international conferences., Study Selection and Data Extraction: All available studies were reviewed to provide pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, efficacy, and safety data on use of single-dose azithromycin for respiratory tract infections., Data Synthesis: Several studies have demonstrated that shorter regimens of azithromycin (1500 mg over 3 day vs 5 day or single dose vs 3 day) provide higher serum exposures compared with the longer regimens. This makes it possible to give the same dose over a shorter period of time and achieve the same efficacy with the potential for enhanced adherence. Single-dose azithromycin 30 mg/kg was approved in 2003 for treatment of acute otitis media (AOM) in children. Studies have demonstrated that, when administering azithromycin as a single dose, its efficacy and safety are comparable to that of other standard regimens for AOM. Single-dose regimens for treatment of respiratory tract infections in adults have not been studied widely, with only 2 studies being conducted for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and one study for treatment of tonsillitis; all demonstrated at least equal efficacy with the single-dose regimen compared with comparators given for longer periods of time., Conclusions: Available data regarding single-dose azithromycin are promising. Although use of this regimen in children is warranted based on studies to date, additional large-scale trials are needed prior to mainstream use of the regimen in adults.

Because Streptococcus pneumoniae is the most commonly isolated community-acquired respiratory tract pathogen, the reports of high rates of antibiotic resistance throughout the world highlight the need for intervention to stem any further increases in resistance. Efforts to reduce the incidence of pneumococcal resistance have been mainly 2-fold, involving attempts to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing, as well as to assure early childhood immunization with the pneumococcal heptavalent conjugate vaccine. To reduce unnecessary prescribing for infections that are typically viral in etiology, such as acute bronchitis, education efforts have been focused not only on clinicians but also on parents and patients. These education efforts significantly reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing, and initial evidence suggests that they may stabilize, if not reduce, the incidence of penicillin and macrolide-resistant pneumococcal isolates. Utilization of the relatively new pneumococcal heptavalent conjugate vaccine not only reduces the incidence of acute otitis media caused by pneumococcal serotypes included in the vaccine as well as disease caused by related serotypes but also has a highly significant effect on reducing the incidence of invasive pneumococcal disease in children and potential adult contacts. In addition more recent data have established that vaccination is also decreasing the carriage and transmission of antibiotic-resistant pneumococcal isolates. Education and vaccine programs that attempt to stabilize and/or reduce the rate of pneumococcal resistance are at least as important as having effective antibiotic treatments for pneumococcal disease. These efforts to address pneumococcal resistance have been highly successful to date.

Objective: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of ceftriaxone plus azithromycin with those of levofloxacin in the treatment of hospitalized patients with moderate to severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP)., Design: Randomized, open-label multicenter trial with 1 : 1 treatment allocation in an inpatient setting., Patients: 212 male or female inpatients with a clinical diagnosis of CAP were included in the study. In each treatment group >50% of patients had a pneumonia severity index of IV or V., Interventions: Open-label treatment with either intravenous (IV) ceftriaxone 1g and IV azithromycin 500 mg daily or IV levofloxacin 500 mg daily. Patients who improved clinically were switched to oral follow-on therapy with either azithromycin 500 mg/day or levofloxacin 500 mg/day. At the clinician's discretion, oral cefuroxime axetil was added to the treatment regimen of patients who received oral azithromycin if a macrolide resistant pneumococcal isolate was documented., Results: Overall, both study treatments were well tolerated. Favorable clinical outcomes in clinically evaluable patients were demonstrated in 91.5% of patients treated with ceftriaxone plus azithromycin and 89.3% (95% CI -7.1%, 11.4%) of patients treated with levofloxacin at the end of therapy visit and in 89.2% and 85.1% (95% CI -6.7%, 14.8%) patients, respectively, at the end of study visit. Bacteriological eradication rates for both treatments were equivalent with the exception of Streptococcus pneumoniae; 44% of isolates were eradicated with levofloxacin compared with 100% of isolates with ceftriaxone plus azithromycin., Conclusions: As acknowledged by international CAP treatment guidelines, the combination of a third-generation cephalosporin and a macrolide is at least as efficacious as monotherapy with a fluoroquinolone with enhanced anti-pneumococcal activity, for hospitalized patients with moderate to severe CAP. Combined medication with a macrolide and third-generation cephalosporin may be preferred over fluoroquinolones as first-line therapy of hospitalized patients with CAP to minimize the development of multiresistant nosocomial Gram-negative bacilli.

Study Objectives: To compare the safety and efficacy of oral azithromycin and levofloxacin in the treatment of outpatients with acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (ABECB)., Design: Randomized, double-blinded, double-dummy, multicenter trial with 1:1 treatment allocation., Setting: Outpatient treatment setting., Patients: Two hundred thirty-five male or female outpatients between the ages of 35 and 75 years who had received a clinical diagnosis of ABECB., Interventions: Blinded treatment with either oral azithromycin, 500 mg on day 1 and 250 mg per day for days 2 to 5, or, oral levofloxacin, 500 mg q24h for 7 days., Results: Both treatments were well-tolerated, with the majority of adverse events being GI in nature. Favorable clinical outcomes in clinically evaluable patients were demonstrated in 89% of patients receiving azithromycin and in 92% of patients receiving levofloxacin by day 4 of therapy. At day 24, the posttherapy visit, favorable responses were approximately 82% and 86%, respectively, for patients in the two treatment groups. The bacterial eradication rates of respiratory pathogens were 96% for azithromycin and 85% for levofloxacin., Conclusions: Despite increasing concerns over macrolide resistance and a higher incidence of Gram-negative pathogens, a standard 5-day course of oral azithromycin was clinically and bacteriologically equivalent to a 7-day course of oral levofloxacin in the treatment of patients with ABECB.

Objective: To describe a case of gabapentin-induced coma that was reversed with flumazenil and hemodialysis., Case Summary: We describe an 83-year-old dialysis-dependent white man who became comatose after a single dose of gabapentin for phantom limb pain. The patient was successfully revived from the coma with administration of flumazenil, which was then followed by hemodialysis. Serum concentration data before and 4 hours after dialysis document the effectiveness of hemodialysis for gabapentin toxicity., Discussion: An objective causality assessment revealed that this adverse event was probably related to the gabapentin that the patient received. To our knowledge, this is the first documented case of not only gabapentin-induced coma, but also the effectiveness of flumazenil for treatment of this type of coma. Although therapeutic hemodialysis has been previously described, our case report is strengthened by the serum concentration monitoring accompanying it., Conclusions: This report underscores the importance of initiating gabapentin therapy at low doses in dialysis-dependent patients and introduces a novel treatment for those who experience toxicity.

This study was conducted to identify whether or not a pharmacokinetic interaction existed when azithromycin and ceftriaxone were administered concurrently. This randomized, open-label, three-way crossover study in 12 healthy volunteers characterized the plasma pharmacokinetic parameter profiles of both drugs, as well as the white blood cell uptake and exposure to azithromycin, when the drugs were administered alone and together. The plasma pharmacokinetic parameters for azithromycin and ceftriaxone did not differ significantly either after a single dose or at steady state when the two were co-administered as opposed to being administered alone. Moreover, the neutrophil and monocyte/lymphocyte peak azithromycin concentrations and sampling period exposures also did not differ significantly between the study arm and the control arm. This study confirms that there is no interaction between azithromycin and ceftriaxone when they are administered concurrently.

Objective: To review the chemistry, spectrum of activity, pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and safety of telithromycin., Data Sources: A MEDLINE search from 1966 to December 2000 was performed via OVID and PubMed using the following search terms: HMR 3647, HMR3647, Ketek, RU 66647, and telithromycin. An extensive review of retrieved literature, abstracts from international scientific conferences, and minutes from regulatory authority meetings was also performed., Data Extraction: Medicinal chemistry, in vitro, animal, and human trials were reviewed for information on the antimicrobial activity, clinical efficacy, pharmacology, and safety of telithromycin., Data Synthesis: Several chemical modifications to the macrolide structure have led to the development of telithromycin, the first ketolide antimicrobial that demonstrates improved activity against penicillin- and macrolide/azalide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae due to its unique binding to the ribosomal target site. Although telithromycin may be useful in the treatment of community-acquired respiratory tract infections due to its activity against common typical and atypical pathogens, questions concerning its reliable activity against Haemophilus influenzae need to be addressed. Telithromycin's pharmacokinetics permit once-daily dosing for abbreviated periods and good distribution into lung tissue and phagocytic cells. Clinical and bacteriologic cure rates have been similar to those of comparator agents in human efficacy trials; however, the incidence of adverse gastrointestinal events were generally higher with telithromycin patients. Like other macrolides and many newer fluoroquinolones, telithromycin's ability to prolong the QTc interval is a potential safety issue, especially in elderly patients with predisposing conditions or those who are concurrently receiving drugs that are substrates for CYP2D6 and 3A4. Liver function test elevations demonstrated during clinical trials, although not overtly severe, may warrant monitoring in some patients taking multiple hepatically metabolized/cleared agents., Conclusions: Telithromycin offers potential advantages over traditional macrolides/azalides for community-acquired respiratory tract infections caused by macrolide-resistant pathogens. Further studies are needed to elucidate its clinical efficacy against H. influenzae, potential drug interactions, and safety in various subpopulations.

The safety profile of erythromycin is notable for the frequent occurrence of intolerable gastrointestinal effects. One of the more serious of these is infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS). A recent cluster of IHPS cases prompted an epidemiological investigation which identified oral erythromycin chemoprophylaxis of pertussis as the major risk factor. Evidence suggests an association between early postnatal erythromycin exposure and IHPS. There is no substantive evidence of a risk associated with prenatal exposure, with the single published case-control study to date producing negative findings. The epidemiological investigations of the association with early postnatal exposure have reported significantly elevated odds ratios but have a variety of methodological limitations that prevent definitive conclusions being made. Nevertheless, the concordance of findings across studies increases the strength of evidence favouring an association. The prominent gastrokinetic properties of erythromycin have been postulated as the mechanism behind this phenomenon. A comprehensive assessment of this potential adverse effect should consider its biological plausibility in light of known gastrointestinal physiology, its modulation by erythromycin, and the known pathophysiology of IHPS. Gastrointestinal motor activity in the fasted mammal consists of three phases, phase III being large amplitude contractions called migrating motor complexes (MMC) that can be initiated by motilin and erythromycin. The gastrokinetic effects of erythromycin are variable and complex and include effects on the timing, duration, amplitude and distribution of MMCs. It has been speculated that the motilinomimetic effects of erythromycin on antral smooth muscle function, such as the MMC, may mediate the effect via work hypertrophy. Although intuitively plausible and consistent with hypertrophic obstructive changes similar to IHPS observed in hyperplastic rat ileum after artificially induced mechanical obstruction, there is no direct evidence of this phenomenon. Further complicating the association is the limitations of our knowledge about the pathophysiology of IHPS, including numerous genetic abnormalities, increased parietal cell mass, and gastric hyperacidity. The implications of the reported findings with erythromycin on the benefit-risk profiles of newer macrolides and azalides must be considered. The available data on the comparative gastrokinetic properties of macrolides are significant for the potent gastrokinetic properties and its acid degradation products, the marked variation in gastrokinetic properties associated with macrolide ring size, and the requirement for specific glycosidic linkages at the C-3 and C-5 carbons of the macrolide ring. The variation in gastrokinetic properties associated with variations in molecular structure suggests that if the association between erythromycin and IHPS is causal it may not be a class effect.

The idea of studying the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antibacterials in order to predict their efficacy has long been of interest. Traditionally, serum drug concentrations have been evaluated against the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of a given pathogen; however, infection site-specific data continue to gain interest from clinicians. Despite methodological limitations, progress in techniques has improved the clinical significance of data generated. Rather than using tissue homogenates which fail to differentiate between interstitial and intracellular concentrations, newer collection techniques focus on sampling of matrices that allow for this differentiation. These collection techniques now allow one to accurately describe beta-lactam and aminoglycoside interstitial penetrations, as well as, the interstitial and phagocytic concentrations of macrolides and fluoroquinolones. By using these specific data and the MICs of infecting pathogens, it is hoped that conclusions can be drawn by a clinician as to the appropriateness of the choice of an antibacterial.

Currently, there are approximately 6 million people with irreversible blindness as a result of chronic follicular conjunctivitis with subsequent corneal scarring caused by Chlamydia trachomatis, also known as trachoma. On the basis of the clinical studies evaluated, the most widely tested effective pharmacological treatments for trachoma today are topical tetracycline 1% to be applied to both eyes twice daily for 6 weeks or a single oral dose of azithromycin 20 mg/kg (up to 1g). Although chemotherapy can generate prompt therapeutic response and surgery can reverse the repercussions of these infections, these conditions will persist through reinfections. Implementing proper personal hygiene and environmental improvement measures for the control of infection transmission will be essential in reducing the potentially devastating results of trachoma infections.

Objective: To review in vitro and in vivo information dealing with pneumococcal antibiotic resistance and provide a review of the incidence, mechanisms, and controversies surrounding this growing problem. The review is also intended to provide clinicians with relevant recommendations on treatment and prevention of this organism., Data Sources and Selection: Primary and review articles were identified by MEDLINE search (1966-August 2000) and through secondary resources such as conference proceedings. All of the articles identified from the data sources were evaluated, and all information deemed relevant was included in this review., Data Synthesis: The growing incidence and reporting of pneumococcal isolates that are resistant to one or more classes of antibiotics have become a troubling trend that has resulted in significant shifts in treatment. Although clinicians have shifted to a new generation or class of antibiotics when faced with a resistance trend, data with resistant pneumococci show that this may not be necessary. By incorporating the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data of antimicrobials into the decision-making process, many of the drugs that we have become hesitant to use due to this resistance may still be appropriate if used correctly., Conclusions: Appropriate dosing of antimicrobials, combined with optimal use of pneumococcal vaccines, will not only prolong the longevity of some agents, but also hopefully slow resistance development.

Objectives: To characterise the peritoneal and subcutaneous adipose penetration of alatrofloxacin. If the extent of penetration of this lipophilic fluoroquinolone is adequate in patients with extensive adipose layers, it may provide better antimicrobial coverage than more commonly used antibiotics that are less lipophilic., Study Participants and Methods: Six morbidly obese individuals undergoing a Roux-Y gastric bypass procedure received single 1-hour infusions of alatrofloxacin equivalent to 300mg of its active metabolite, trovafloxacin. Blood samples were obtained over a 24-hour period and adipose tissue from subcutaneous and deep tissue sites were obtained approximately 3 hours post-infusion of alatrofloxacin. Plasma and adipose tissue concentrations of trovafloxacin were determined by high pressure liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection., Results: The mean maximum plasma concentration, area under the concentration-time curve, and elimination half-life of trovafloxacin were 3.6 mg/L, 37.4 mg/L·h, and 12.1h, respectively. The mean tissue concentrations at the subcutaneous and deep adipose sites were 0.43 and 0.41 μ/g, respectively., Conclusions: These results indicated that the pharmacokinetics of trovafloxacin in morbidly obese individuals are similar to those in healthy control individuals. In addition, the concentrations of trovafloxacin achieved in the adipose tissue were above the minimum inhibitory concentration of most pathogens responsible for surgical and decubitus ulcer infections.

Owing to azithromycin's prolonged half-life, shorter and shorter dosage regimens are being studied for treatment of respiratory tract infections. Previous studies have concluded that the 3 and 5 day (1.5 g total) regimens not only provide at least equal serum and WBC exposures but also equal efficacy rates. An earlier clinical study using the entire 1.5 g dose at once or the current 3 day regimen in patients with atypical pneumonia noted equal efficacy. Similar trials are currently underway in both adult and paediatric populations. The goal of the present study was to investigate whether there were equal serum and WBC exposures when azithromycin was dosed as the current 3 day regimen or as a single large dose. Equal exposures would help validate future clinical trials of single dose regimens. Twelve healthy volunteers received both azithromycin regimens (1.5 g single dose and 500 mg/day for 3 days) in random order. Serum and WBC samples were collected at baseline and repeatedly for 10 days following the first dose of each regimen. Serum samples were assayed via HPLC (CV% < 10) and WBC samples via liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (CV% < 10). Data were modelled using noncompartmental methods. Statistics were via ANOVA with significance defined as P < 0.05. All subjects completed both regimens with minimal incidence of adverse effects. Serum data [mean (range)] demonstrated no significant difference in exposure between the two regimens [single 13.1 (3.02-20.6) mg x h/L versus 3 day 11.2 (2.98-24.5) mg x h/L: P = 0.12], although it favoured the shorter regimen. WBC results demonstrated much higher exposures than seen with serum, but no significant difference between the two regimens was identified. These results suggest that a single oral 1.5 g regimen of azithromycin for respiratory tract infections should provide exposure at least equal to currently approved treatment regimens.

Currently, antibacterial activity is measured primarily via in vitro laboratory tests. Clinicians rely heavily upon the reported susceptibility gained via in vitro laboratory tests when choosing an antibacterial agent. An evolving concept is to utilise pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic drug properties in addition to in vitro susceptibility reports to assess the potential effectiveness of an antibacterial agent against a specific pathogen. This article presents examples of the utility of these concepts in terms of optimal clinical use of common antibacterials as well as more informed interpretation of the in vitro literature.

The azalide antibiotic azithromycin and the newer macrolides, such as clarithromycin, dirithromycin and roxithromycin, can be regarded as 'advanced-generation' macrolides compared with erythromycin, the first macrolide used clinically as an antibiotic. Their pharmacokinetics are characterized by a combination of low serum concentrations, high tissue concentrations and, in the case of azithromycin, an extended tissue elimination half-life. Azithromycin is particularly noted for high and prolonged concentrations at the site of infection. This allows once-daily dosing for 3 days in the treatment of respiratory tract infections, in contrast to longer dosage periods required for erythromycin, clarithromycin, roxithromycin and agents belonging to other classes of antibiotics. The spectrum of activity of the advanced-generation macrolides comprises Gram-positive, atypical and upper respiratory anaerobic pathogens. Azithromycin and the active metabolite of clarithromycin also demonstrate activity against community-acquired Gram-negative organisms, such as Haemophilus influenzae. Advanced-generation macrolides, and in particular azithromycin, are highly concentrated within polymorphonuclear leucocytes, which gravitate by chemotactic mechanisms to sites of infection. Following phagocytosis of the pathogens at the infection site, they are exposed to very high, and sometimes cidal, intracellular concentrations of antibacterial agent. Pharmacodynamic models and susceptibility breakpoints derived from studies with other classes of drugs, such as the beta-lactams and aminoglycosides, do not adequately explain the clinical utility of antibacterial agents that achieve high intracellular concentrations. In the case of azithromycin, attention should focus on tissue pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic concepts.

A two-way, open-label, crossover study in 12 subjects was undertaken to study the potential for azithromycin to alter the pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir and/or its active metabolite, M8. A secondary objective was to characterize any potential interaction that nelfinavir may have with azithromycin. During one dosing arm, subjects received a single 1200 mg oral dose of azithromycin. During the other, subjects received 11 days of nelfinavir 750 mg q8h with a single 1200 mg oral dose of azithromycin given concurrently with the Day 9 morning nelfinavir dose. Serum samples were collected after each azithromycin dose for 168 hours and after the Day 8 and 9 morning nelfinavir doses for 8 hours to characterize azithromycin, nelfinavir, and M8 pharmacokinetic parameters during both control and test periods. Both dosing regimens were well tolerated, with only mild to moderate GI side effects being the most frequently reported. Azithromycin was found to cause a statistically, though not clinically, significant decrease in nelfinavir and M8 exposures. In contrast, nelfinavir caused azithromycin Cmax and exposure (AUC) values to increase by > 100%. Inhibition of p-glycoprotein by nelfinavir may be responsible for this significant interaction. This increase in azithromycin exposure has the potential to increase clinical antibacterial efficacy without significantly increasing gastrointestinal side effects, though the impact on other systemic sites needs to be studied.

Objective: To describe the current drug interaction profiles for the commonly used macrolides in the US and Europe, and to comment on the clinical impact of these interactions., Data Sources: A MEDLINE search (1975-1998) was performed to identify all pertinent studies, review articles, and case reports. When appropriate information was not available in the literature, data were obtained from the product manufacturers., Study Selection: All available data were reviewed to provide an unbiased account of possible drug interactions., Data Extraction: Data for some of the interactions were not available from the literature, but were available from abstracts or company-supplied materials. Although the data were not always explicit, the best attempt was made to deliver pertinent information that clinical practitioners would need to formulate practice opinions. When more in-depth information was supplied in the form of a review or study report, a thorough explanation of pertinent methodology was supplied., Data Synthesis: Several clinically significant drug interactions have been identified since the approval of erythromycin. These interactions usually were related to the inhibition of the cytochrome P450 enzyme systems, which are responsible for the metabolism of many drugs. The decreased metabolism by the macrolides has in some instances resulted in potentially severe adverse events. The development and marketing of newer macrolides are hoped to improve the drug interaction profile associated with this class. However, this has produced variable success. Some of the newer macrolides demonstrated an interaction profile similar to that of erythromycin; others have improved profiles. The most success in avoiding drug interactions related to the inhibition of cytochrome P450 has been through the development of the azalide subclass, of which azithromycin is the first and only to be marketed. Azithromycin has not been demonstrated to inhibit the cytochrome P450 system in studies using a human liver microsome model, and to date has produced none of the classic drug interactions characteristic of the macrolides., Conclusions: Most of the available data regarding macrolide drug interactions are from studies in healthy volunteers and case reports. These data suggest that clarithromycin appears to have an interaction profile similar to that of erythromycin. Given this similarity, it is important to consider the interaction profile of clarithromycin when using erythromycin. This is especially necessary as funds for further studies of a medication available in generic form (e.g., erythromycin) are limited. Azithromycin has produced few clinically significant interactions with any agent cleared through the cytochrome P450 enzyme system. Although the available data are promising, the final test should come from studies conducted in patients who are taking potentially interacting compounds on a chronic basis.

The global challenge of optimally treating bacterial infections is continuously evolving. Azithromycin, the first azalide antibiotic, presents pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics that allow for a simple dosing regimen with minimal side effects. Current azithromycin uses include a variety of community-acquired respiratory tract, skin and soft tissue, and sexually transmitted disease infections. Azithromycin has also demonstrated substantial activity against atypical organisms such as Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) and Chlamydia trachomatis. Due to a never-ending need for new antibiotic therapies, several other potential indications for azithromycin are being researched. This article will present various current research associated with azithromycin's potential use for malaria, trachoma, coronary artery disease (CAD), Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections, erythema migrans, short-term therapy for respiratory infections, typhoid, cryptosporidiosis, pelvic inflammatory disease, acne, Mediterranean spotted fever and MAC. As bacterial and parasite resistance patterns fluctuate globally, azithromycin may be an alternative therapy for the previously mentioned indications, which will also enhance patient compliance and therefore effectively eradicate infection worldwide.

Background: Azithromycin, fluconazole and cotrimoxazole (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; TMP/SMX) are all agents that are utilised for the treatment and/or prophylaxis of opportunistic infections in patients with AIDS., Objective: To characterise the potential for an interaction when azithromycin is coadministered with cotrimoxazole or with fluconazole., Design: Two separate nonblind randomised studies were conducted in healthy volunteers. During the fluconazole study the potential for fluconazole to adversely affect the pharmacokinetics of azithromycin was also studied., Participants: 24 (cotrimoxazole) and 18 (fluconazole) healthy male and female volunteers., Results: The results of both studies indicated that neither the peak concentrations of nor the exposures (area under the concentration-time curve) to the test drugs were changed when azithromycin was coadministered. In addition, fluconazole did not significantly alter the pharmacokinetic parameters of azithromycin., Conclusions: Azithromycin does not alter the bioavailability of either cotrimoxazole or fluconazole.

Study Objectives: The objectives of this study were to characterize the single-dose and steady-state plasma pharmacokinetics of IV levofloxacin and IV alatrofloxacin, and to compare the results to pneumococcal isolate sensitivities in order to estimate the clinical efficacy of current community-acquired pneumonia treatment regimens against pneumococcal infections., Design: Two-way, open-label, randomized, crossover study., Participants: Each of 12 healthy volunteer subjects received IV levofloxacin, 500 mg qd for 7 days, and IV alatrofloxacin, 200 mg qd for 7 days. The two regimens were separated by a 2-week washout period., Measurements and Results: Plasma concentration profiles were collected around the first and final doses of both regimens and were assayed for their respective quinolone concentrations. When the peak concentrations for both agents were compared to standard twofold dilution minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for pneumococcal isolates, it was discovered that the breakpoint MIC value at which each compound would no longer achieve a peak plasma concentration/MIC ratio of at least 12:1 was 0.5 mg/L for levofloxacin and 0.25 mg/L for alatrofloxacin., Conclusions: Based on the MIC that inhibits 90% of isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae for both of these agents (1.0 to 2.0 mg/L for levofloxacin and 0.125 to 0.25 mg/L for trovafloxacin), our results indicate that although the once-daily regimen of alatrofloxacin appears to be appropriate for this pathogen, a more aggressive regimen may need to be investigated to optimize the clinical and microbiological effects of levofloxacin.

There is no doubt that owing to the prolific use of the macrolides and azithromycin over the past several years, resistance has developed and is increasing in incidence. I believe we should re-evaluate the use of these antibiotics for our patients and consider parameters other than the negative in-vitro results. Firstly, microbiology laboratories should return to the habit of providing the clinician with MIC values for pathogenic isolates rather than generic susceptibility reports ((S)usceptible, (I)ntermediate, (R)esistant) that are based on standard disc diffusion testing. Although agar dilution MIC testing is a bulky and labour intensive practice, it provides the best data when conducted in the appropriate environment. Secondly, and more importantly, these MIC values need to be compared with in-vivo antibiotic pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Although it is possible to compare MIC values directly with serum concentrations of beta-lactams and aminoglycosides, this is not a valid practice for azithromycin or the macrolides. MICs of azithromycin and the macrolides must be compared with the infection site and phagocytic cell concentrations to determine the utility, or lack thereof, of one of these agents. Whereas azithromycin cellular penetration allows maximal pharmacodynamics potentially even against moderately or highly resistant pneumococci, the macrolides do so less optimally. Although there are no reports of widespread clinical failures resulting from macrolide/azalide resistance in pneumococci, it is expected that such reports will appear once the isolates become consistently highly resistant. This is likely to affect the macrolides, erythromycin and clarithromycin, before the azalide, azithromycin owing to the differences in pharmacokinetics of these drugs. Until then, it will be important to determine the MICs of not just one macrolide, but of all macrolides and azalides for the isolates. This will allow the clinician to make a pharmacokinetically and pharmacodynamically sound choice. By choosing clinical MIC breakpoints of 4-8 mg/L for oral macrolides and < or = 32 mg/L for oral azithromycin, rather than the present standard breakpoints, the clinician can make a macrolide/azalide choice that will optimize the pharmacodynamics of the drug against the isolated pathogen and result in the best possible clinical outcome. Once data concerning the cellular penetration of intravenous formulations of these drugs becomes available, it will be possible to develop clinical breakpoints for these formulations as well. Only through utilizing good antibiotic prescribing practices and by using the drugs appropriately when they are used, can resistance trends be stemmed. In this way, not only does a clinician treat the patient more effectively, but they also extend the antibiotic's useful life.

This randomized, open-label, crossover study was conducted to investigate whether the coadministration of zafirlukast would affect the pharmacokinetics of azithromycin, clarithromycin, or 14-hydroxyclarithromycin (14-OHC). Twelve healthy subjects (six males and six females) received single 500-mg doses of azithromycin and clarithromycin with and without zafirlukast given to a steady-state concentration. Blood was collected prior to all macrolide doses and for 3 and 10 days after each clarithromycin and azithromycin dose, respectively. Serum was assayed for azithromycin, clarithromycin, and 14-OHC concentrations by validated high-performance liquid chromatography assay systems. Data analyses were done by noncompartmental and nonparametric methods. Analysis of the patients indicated that the addition of steady-state concentrations of zafirlukast did not significantly alter the pharmacokinetic parameters of or overall exposure (based on the area under the concentration-time curve) to azithromycin, clarithromycin, and 14-OHC. While zafirlukast is a known inhibitor of CYP3A4, it does not appear to exert a clinically or statistically significant pharmacokinetic effect on azithromycin, clarithromycin, or 14-OHC.

We reviewed English-language clinical studies, abstracts, and review articles identified from MEDLINE searches from January 1966-August 1998, and bibliographies of identified articles to compare advanced-generation macrolides dirithromycin and clarithromycin and their use for respiratory tract infections. Both agents have superior adverse effect profiles compared with erythromycin, the original macrolide. Both have broad antibacterial coverage, but clarithromycin usually has a lower MIC90 to susceptible organisms than dirithromycin; for most isolates this difference is not clinically significant. Clarithromycin has better in vitro coverage of Haemophilus influenzae, but this activity varies with formation of its bioactive metabolite, 14-hydroxyclarithromycin. Neither agent is ideal for H. influenzae eradication. The agents differ markedly in terms of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, metabolism, and cost, and thus with respect to drug interaction profiles and dosages. Dirithromycin's drug interaction profile is markedly better than clarithromycin's. Clarithromycin is dosed twice/day; dirithromycin's pharmacokinetics allow once/day dosing. Dirithromycin is less expensive with regard to both cost/day and cost/treatment regimen. Clarithromycin has been studied and approved for administration to children. In adults with respiratory tract infections who are receiving drugs that would interact with clarithromycin, and in those with renal dysfunction with or without coexisting hepatic dysfunction, dirithromycin appears to be superior in terms of safety and equivalent to clarithromycin in terms of efficacy.

Resistance to macrolides in vitro is increasingly being reported. However, there has been no corresponding increase in clinical failures noted. Lack of clinical failures due to resistance is most likely the result of the high intracellular concentrations that these drugs achieve in phagocytes. In the case of clarithromycin, concentrations in both monocytes and granulocytes fluctuate between peaks of approximately 22-25 mg/l and troughs of approximately 5 mg/l during a standard dosing interval. In contrast, azithromycin attains concentrations of over 60 mg/l in granulocytes and at least 100 mg/l in monocytes. After 7 days, azithromycin concentrations of >32 mg/l are still observed. These data also imply that against pathogens with increasing minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), macrolides with relatively lower or less sustained intracellular concentrations will become ineffective clinically much sooner than compounds, such as azithromycin, that concentrate to a high degree and are retained in white blood cells for prolonged periods.

Objective: To review the pharmacology, microbiology, chemistry, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety, tolerability, dosage, administration, and economic issues of intravenous azithromycin., Data Sources: A MEDLINE search from 1978 to May 1998 of the English-language literature and an extensive review of journals and meeting abstracts was conducted. Due to the lack of published literature concerning the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of the intravenous formulation of azithromycin, the manufacturer was also contacted and requested to supply information concerning intravenous azithromycin., Data Extraction: In vitro and preclinical studies were included, as well as data from Phase II and III clinical trials. Efficacy, pharmacokinetic, safety, and tolerability data were also supplemented with information from the manufacturer, due to the lack of published reports., Data Synthesis: Azithromycin, an azalide subclass of the macrolide antibiotics, is now available as an intravenous formulation. The intravenous form is approved for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia caused by Chlamydia pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae. Legionella pneumophila, Moraxella catarrhalis, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus (methicillin-sensitive), and Streptococcus pneumoniae, and for the treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease caused by Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Mycoplasma hominis in situations in which intravenous therapy is required. Its spectrum of activity, unique pharmacokinetics, and high and sustained tissue penetration allow for once-daily dosing with monotherapy in many cases. Clinical and bacteriologic response rates as well as the adverse event profile have been similar to or better than comparative agents., Conclusions: Azithromycin offers advantages over other agents due to its unique pharmacokinetics, high and sustained tissue penetration, and spectrum of activity. This allows for monotherapy and once-daily intravenous dosing for mild-to-moderate community-acquired pneumonia or pelvic inflammatory disease in many instances. Future research should focus on total duration of antibiotic therapy and the need, or lack thereof, for extensive oral antibiotic follow-up.