Search

Some severe burn injuries may warrant amputation; however, the physical and functional adjustments resulting from postburn amputation can have long-term consequences. This study investigates longitudinal functional and psychosocial outcomes among pediatric burn amputees. Pediatric participants enrolled in the Burn Model System national longitudinal, multicenter database between 2015 and 2023 with postburn amputations were included. Participants with amputations were matched using nearest-neighbor matching to those without amputations based on burn location, age, and % total burn surface area burn size. Primary outcomes were the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pediatric-25 Profile v2.0 Physical Function and the Children Burn Outcomes Questionnaire: appearance subscore, both measured at 6-, 12-, and 24 months postburn. In this study, 17 participants had amputations, and 17 did not (matched participants). Pairwise analyses at each timepoint found those with amputations reported significantly lower physical function scores at 24 months postburn (54.9 ± 11.6 vs 66 ± 5, P = .013). No significant differences were found in appearance scores. This study suggests that pediatric burn amputees may potentially face greater physical impairment long-term, highlighting an important area of research that deserves further attention., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Burn Association. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: Contemporary advances in combat medicine have allowed greater numbers of wounded service members to survive their injuries. An estimated 1,705 combat veterans sustained major lower or upper extremity amputations between 2001 and 2017 during the Global War on Terror. This study intends to answer the following question utilizing a qualitative study design: What were the common and abnormal experiences of the Global War on Terror combat amputees relative to their mechanism of injury, perception of injury, and systems of care utilized during their recovery and rehabilitation process?., Methods: During the months of December 2022 and January 2023, individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with U.S. Marines that served in the Global War on Terror (total n = 10). Deductive and inductive approaches were employed to identify codes, themes, and meta-themes in the data., Results: All participants deployed to Afghanistan between the years 2010 and 2014 and were assigned to the following military occupational specialties: Explosive Ordnance Disposal technicians (total n = 2); combat engineers (total n = 2); and infantrymen (total n = 6). Analysis of data collected from interviews highlighted these key observations: (1) Themes in the combat amputee experience include support, systems of care, and mindset and (2) the themes synergistically contribute to the meta-themes mental health and pain and vice versa. As all participants were subjected to a blast mechanism of injury, it is difficult to determine if this played a role in deviating rehabilitation and recovery processes. Perception of injury and how well participants adapted to their new lifestyle, meaning how optimistic they were, appeared to play a significant role in recovery. Participants had mixed feelings about the care they had received but generally spoke favorably of military hospitals and were frustrated with the Veteran Affairs, and there was no clear consensus on their relationship with civilian health care, though most participants chose to seek most of their care through the Veteran Affairs., Conclusion: Based on the research question, this study found an intricate relationship between mental health, pain, and the experiences of the participants regarding their care and rehabilitation. However, the nature of qualitative research makes it impossible to determine generalizations that can be used to create meaningful change to address improving combat amputee veteran care. Further research into long-term health outcomes based on hypotheses not evaluated in existing literature would further improve the ability of health care providers to care for this unique patient population., (© The Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2023. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Reintegration back into one's life following limb loss is heavily influenced by the interaction among the individual's mental health, environment, and physical factors (eg, pain and prostheses). While many patients experience posttraumatic growth and successfully reintegrate back into their lives, others have a more difficult adjustment. Interdisciplinary teams can best facilitate reintegration through early screening for barriers to reintegration such as depression, pain, body image, and inaccessible environments, to intervene early after amputation. With these barriers addressed, amputees may be able to return to driving and other valued activities more quickly, resulting in improved reintegration across life domains., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors declare that they have no relevant or material financial interests that relate to the research described in this article., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Lower limb amputation can lead to psychological problems.There is a lack of data to evaluate the psychological problems and associated factors in lower limb amputees., Aim: Prevalence and factors associated with psychological disorder and phantom limb pain in lower limb amputees METHODS: It was a cross-sectional study with a consecutive sampling technique. Patients were assessed on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) for the presence of depression and anxiety disorder. DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for substance use disorder were used, andphantom limb pain was diagnosed as defined by Pare., Results: 103 patients were included in the present study with a mean age of37.7 ± 14.5 yrs. The majorityof patients were males (87.4 %), married (69.9 %), on paid employment (95.1 %), and were of middle socioeconomic status (83.5 %). Most of the patients presented with roadside accident injuries (83.5 %)and had below-knee amputation (58.3 %). As per DSM-5, 38.8 % had a substance use disorder, out of which 35.9 % and 24.3 % had alcohol and tobacco use disorders, respectively. On HADS, 48.5 % had a presence of depressive disorder, and 30.1 % had anxiety disorder. The majority of patients (97.1 %) had phantom limb pain. Those from rural areas reported significantly more frequency of anxiety (x 2 -5.501; p-0.019) and depressive disorder (x 2 -7.009; p-0.008). Lower incomehad a significant positive association with depression (r-0.228; p-0.021) and phantom limb pain (U-22.500; p-0.008)., Conclusion: The prevalence of psychiatric morbidity in lower-limb amputeeswas very high. The most common psychological morbidity was depression,followed by anxiety disorder and substance use disorders.Our findings reflect that we would benefit by including mental health professionals asintegral members of the multidisciplinary team to do an early psychological assessment and intervention, which would help prevent psychological illnesses and improve quality of life., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest We authorise that we do not have any competing interest for the article titled “Prevalence and Factors Associated with Psychological Morbidity, Phantom Limb Pain in Lower Limb Amputees” submitted in the prestigious journal., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To explore health care providers' (HCP) experiences related to transitions in care from inpatient rehabilitation to the community for patients with limb loss., Materials and Methods: A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews. Participants were eligible if they were HCPs currently working in amputation rehabilitation at a rehabilitation hospital in Ontario, Canada, with at least 1-year experience in this setting, and could speak and understand English. Data were analyzed thematically using the six-step process of the DEPICT model dynamic reading, engaged codebook development, participatory coding, inclusive reviewing and summarizing of categories, collaborative analyzing and translating., Results: Fourteen HCPs from a variety of health care professions participated in this study. Five key themes describe participants' perspectives on the factors impacting patients' transition in care following limb loss. Specifically, participants emphasized patient preparedness, HCP follow-up, finances and funding, patient self-management skills, and psychosocial support as factors that could influence the transition in care., Conclusion: This study identified challenges to transitions in care for people with limb loss. Future research is needed to evaluate solutions to address these challenges in transitions in care.

Purpose: Outcome measurement provides clinicians, services and funders with useful information. However, little is known about the experience of participating in outcome measurement during lower limb prosthetic rehabilitation from the patient's perspective., Materials and Methods: Thirty-two participants who underwent lower limb amputation within 5 years, and had experience of taking part in outcome measurement during prosthetic rehabilitation, were recruited from UK limb fitting centers and social media. Data were collected using focus groups and interviews and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis., Results: Four themes were identified. (1) How does participating in outcome measurement make me feel? (2) Do the outcome measures used in routine clinical care capture an accurate picture of my recovery? (3) Who is outcome measurement for? and (4) are prosthetic services measuring what is meaningful? These themes suggest outcome measurement is not a neutral activity for patients following lower limb amputation., Conclusions: Harnessing the positive impacts of measuring outcomes could be used for motivation, to support adjustment and recovery, to improve communication and to support shared decision-making. This could make outcome measurement more meaningful and patient-centered. However, there may be potential for patients to respond negatively to outcome measures and clinicians should consider their impact on psychosocial factors.

Purpose: The aim of this review is to synthesise the experiences and needs of people who had undergone dysvascular lower extremity amputations. Given the increasing global prevalence of vascular diseases like diabetes mellitus and peripheral arterial disease, the risk of requiring an amputation remains high., Materials and Methods: This systematic review follows the PRISMA and ENTREQ reporting guidelines. Seven databases were searched for qualitative studies from January 2011 to October 2023. In total 6435 studies were obtained, where 1146 were duplicates and 5271 studies failed to meet the eligibility criteria. The remaining 18 studies were synthesised using Sandelowski and Barroso's approach and appraised using the CASP checklist., Results: Four themes emerged from the meta-synthesis: (1) making the decision to amputate, (2) difficulties in the physical adaptation to limb loss, (3) psychosocial consequences of living with an amputation, and (4) regaining control and building hope., Conclusions: Having dysvascular lower extremity amputations is a complicated experience as not only was the pre-amputation pain relieved, but a new set of physical, emotional and social challenges would surface after the amputation. These synthesised findings serve as a platform to explore the factors behind the various experiences faced by these people and how healthcare professionals can help them in their adjustment.

Introduction: Rehabilitation after childhood lower limb loss is complex and dependent on multiple stakeholders and environmental factors. While research with adults underscores the importance of involving prosthetic limb users and caregivers in discussions to drive innovation, children are often excluded or not effectively engaged. This protocol lays out the development and implementation protocol for an internationally applicable research toolkit which has been designed and evaluated around the essential presence of the child. Research domains span their unique prosthetic needs, quality of life, pain, and mobility., Methods and Analysis: Cohorts of children in contrasting environments were identified (Cambodia, Gaza Strip, and the UK) to provide a comprehensive global understanding of the child with lower limb loss. A literature review revealed a lack of appropriate tools for identifying paediatric prosthetic user requirements leading to the development of novel interview guides for each key stakeholder: child, caregiver, and prosthetist. The child's guide centred around enjoyment and engagement using card games and activities. A panel of experts in paediatric limb loss and mental health rigorously reviewed the guides. Guides were integrated with existing validated measures for quality of life, pain, and mobility to form a comprehensive toolkit. The toolkit was successfully piloted with 5 children, their families, and 2 prosthetists. This protocol lays out the toolkit rationale and implementation plan (Jan 2023 to Dec 2025). This work offers the opportunity for this cohort to enjoyably engage with research that seeks to radically improve prospects for all children living with limb loss. The outlined best practices ensure ethical considerations when working with vulnerable cohorts., Ethics and Dissemination: This study is approved to cover implementation at all geographical locations as well as the researcher institutions. Results will be disseminated through national and international conferences, as well as through manuscripts in leading peer-reviewed journals., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Edgar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Objective: To gather preliminary evidence on short- and long-term care priorities for people with lower extremity amputations., Design: A three-round modified Delphi study using semi-structured interviews., Participants: A convenience sample of 20 adult participants who had undergone lower extremity amputations at a tertiary public hospital., Main Measure: Consensus on each care priority was defined a priori as an agreement of more than 50%. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to understand the rationales for endorsing the care priorities., Results: Consensus was reached on 24 short-term care priorities and 12 long-term care priorities in the biomedical, practical and psychological and spiritual domains. The rationales for endorsing each of the care priorities generated three themes: preparedness; mental health, psychological and spiritual well-being; and participating in life, with respect and dignity., Conclusions: Our results highlight the substantial need to improve patient access to education and planning support prior to undergoing limb amputation, and optimising post-amputation rehabilitation programmes, enabling people with amputations to participate in meaningful life roles that provide them with purpose, dignity, and self-respect. The knowledge of care priorities revealed in this study may promote effective patient-centred care and improve clinical outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Limb amputation can lead to significant functional challenges in daily activities, prompting amputees to use prosthetic devices (PDs). However, the cognitive demands of PDs and usability issues have resulted in user rejections. This study aimed to create a Human Performance Model for Upper-Limb Prosthetic Devices (HPM-UP). The model used formulations of learnability, error rate, memory load, efficiency, and satisfaction to assess usability. The model was validated in an experiment with 30 healthy participants using a bypass prosthetic device. Findings indicated that the HPM-UP successfully predicted the usability of prosthetic devices, aligning with human subject data. This research proposes a quantitative approach to predict upper limb prosthetic device usability by quantifying each dimension and computationally connecting them. The model, available on Github and executable with Rstudio, could enable clinicians to assess and analyze the human performance of various commercial prostheses, aiding in recommending optimal devices for patients., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Numerous military soldiers have lost limbs as a result of the Syrian War. While there are variations between trauma-related amputations in military and civilian populations, both scenarios result in life-changing injuries., Objective: To explore the relationship between body image, self-esteem, and quality of life (QOL) domains following trauma-related major amputation. It will be the first study in Syria on the correlation between self-esteem and body image. It will help improve our quality of care to meet patient needs and increase well-being, which in turn will help to address body image, self-esteem, and QOL., Method: A cross-sectional study that recruited 235 soldiers with amputations in two centers and two military hospitals in Latakia and Tartous. Patients were given an 81-item questionnaire that included the Amputee Body-Image Scale (ABIS), the Rosenberg Self-esteem (RSE) scale, the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire, and unidimensional pain measures. The ANOVA test, a student's t-test, multiple linear regression, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability were utilized for statistical analysis., Results: There was a strong relationship between body image, self-esteem, and QOL, with the presence of body image concerns significantly associated with lower self-esteem scores and lower QOL scores (p=0.001). Patients with phantom pain sensation had significantly reduced self-esteem (p =0.001), greater body image concerns (p =0.001), and lower scores in all domains of QOL. We found that body image and self-esteem impacted the psychological, social, and environmental domains. After controlling for pain level and number of co-morbid conditions, body image and self-esteem did not predict WHOQOL-BREF scores, with the exception of the environmental domain, where no pain and low self-esteem predicted better environmental domain scores., Conclusion: Patients' body image and self-esteem were greatly impacted by lower-limb amputations. Additionally, phantom pain further impacted self-esteem, body image, and QOL. The image of the body had a profound effect on psychological, social, and environmental domains, and self-esteem was influenced by almost all aspects of QOL., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The author declared that no conflict of interest exists, (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose: Life after any amputation can be significantly altered and can have a significant impact on quality of life (QoL). However, most of the evidence base involves older aged amputees, therefore there is a lack of understanding about the impact of amputation on QoL and the factors that predict QoL in younger amputees. The aim of this review is to identify the factors that predict QoL in young amputees., Methods: MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science were searched to identify articles that measured QoL in young amputees. Articles were independently assessed by two assessors. Data was extracted from the selected articles and a narrative synthesis performed., Results: 18 articles were included in this review. QoL outcome measures varied between studies. The quality of evidence was generally low. This review identified, gender, age, cause of amputation, level of amputation, phantom pain, ability to use a prosthesis, physical function, depression, anxiety, body image, type of prosthesis as predictors of QoL., Conclusion: This review identified modifiable and non-modifiable predictors of QoL in young amputees. Future research needs to focus on exploring the modifiable predictors of QoL as these are the aspects that can be improved to enhance QoL.

Purpose: Use of a lower limb prosthesis generally requires increased cognitive effort to compensate for missing motor and sensory inputs. This study sought to examine how lower limb prosthesis users perceive paying attention to their prosthesis(es) in daily life., Materials and Methods: Focus groups with lower limb prosthesis users were conducted virtually using semi-structured questions. Verbatim transcripts were excerpted, coded, and reconciled. Inductive thematic analysis was undertaken to identify experiences shared by participants., Results: Five themes emerged from five focus groups conducted with thirty individuals: Paying attention to my prosthesis is just what I have to do; I pay attention to how my prosthetic socket fits and feels every day; I pay attention because I don't want to fall; I pay attention because I have to learn to do things in a new way; and If I can trust that my prosthesis will do what I want, I can pay less attention to it., Conclusions: Prosthetic attention, including both background and foreground attention, is a shared experience among lower limb prosthesis users. The amount and frequency of prosthetic attention fluctuates throughout the day and changes over time. Measuring attention could inform the evaluation and prescription of technology intended to reduce cognitive effort.

Objective: Investigating doctors' communicative practices for recommending surgery to amputees when the proposal counters patients' expectation., Method: Conversation Analysis of 77 videorecorded medical consultations at an Italian prosthesis clinic., Results: Compared to the direct format doctors used to prescribe prosthesis, when suggesting surgery doctors adopted a more circuitous, indirect approach. They used a range of communication strategies, orientating to patients' likely resistance - indeed, patients were frequently observed to reject surgical options., Conclusions: Considering patients' expectations is part of a patient centred approach, hence the cautious ways in which doctors introduce the option of surgery. Moreover, doctors do not pursue recommending surgery when patients display their reluctance or resistance., Practice Implications: Doctors in prosthetics clinics might adopt a more balanced communicative strategy that takes into account patients' perspectives, concerns and expectations, whilst but also providing patients with the necessary information to collaborate meaningfully to decision making., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest As a corresponding author, on behalf of all the authors, I declare that all the authors of this paper do not have any competing interests that could have inappropriately influenced our work., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Major lower extremity amputation is a significant life-changing event that can have long-term implications. The goal of this study was to assess long-term medical outcomes and social determinants of health (SDH) challenges in this population., Methods: A retrospective review of major lower extremity (previously mentioned ankle) amputations (2018-2022) was performed at a safety-net tertiary care center. Patients who participated in an SDH survey between 6 months and 1.5 years postoperatively were included for survey analysis. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and perioperative and long-term outcomes were analyzed., Results: There were 100 patients included. Mean age was 61.5 years and 23% were of female gender. The majority (57%) were Black race, 20% White race, and 21% Hispanic ethnicity. Comorbidities included diabetes (78%), chronic kidney disease (51%), coronary artery disease (31%), congestive heart failure (23%), previous cerebrovascular events (19%), and 37% used opioids preadmission. At baseline, the majority (62%) lived at home. Guillotine amputation was performed in 24%, with definitive amputation in the following and previously mentioned knee in 67% and 33%, respectively. Median length of stay was 7 days. Readmission at 30 days, 90 days, and 1 year was 13%, 30%, and 43% respectively. The average follow up was 839 days. At long-term follow up, 55% lived at home, 25% used opioids, and only 25% were independently ambulatory. In the SDH survey at follow up, 32% identified at least one SDH challenge, with younger patients more often affected (58 vs. 63 years, P = 0.031). SDH challenges consisted of food insecurity (17%), housing insecurity (13%), transportation challenges (13%), seeking employment (8%), difficulty paying for utilities (5%) and medications (4%), seeking further education (5%), and difficulty caring for family/friends (4%). On multivariable analysis, having at least one SDH challenge was independently associated with 1-year readmission (odds ratio 6.7, 95% confidence interval 1.3-35.8, P < 0.001). Older age was associated with lower long-term independent ambulation (odds ratio 0.92, 95% confidence interval 0.85-0.99, P = 0.025)., Conclusions: After major lower extremity amputation, patients have significant medical and social challenges with fewer living at home, the majority were not independently ambulatory, and one-third having at least one SDH challenge. Improvements in long-term support including medical, social, and rehabilitation services are required for this vulnerable population., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To explore cognitive load in people with transfemoral amputations fitted with socket or bone-anchored prostheses by describing activity in the left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortices during single- and dual-task walking., Design: Cross-sectional pilot study., Patients: 8 socket prosthesis users and 8 bone-anchored prosthesis users. All were fitted with microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees., Methods: Participants answered self-report questionnaires and performed gait tests during 1 single-task walking condition and 2 dual-task walking conditions. While walking, activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex was measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Cognitive load was investigated for each participant by exploring the relative concentration of oxygenated haemoglobin in the left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Symmetry of brain activity was investigated by calculating a laterality index., Results: Self-report measures and basic gait variables did not show differences between the groups. No obvious between-group differences were observed in the relative concentration of oxygenated haemoglobin for any walking condition. There was a tendency towards more right-side brain activity for participants using a socket prosthesis during dual-task conditions., Conclusions: This pilot study did not identify substantial differences in cognitive load or lateralization between socket prosthesis users and bone-anchored prosthesis users.

Published reports on the functional benefits of esthetic prosthesis are based on either anecdotal evidence or simplified, nonstandard forms of hand function evaluation performed by the researcher. It is not clear whether and how patients actually make functional use of their prosthesis on a daily basis. We report a case of a patient with a partial hand amputation who was initially ambivalent about fitting an esthetic prosthesis, but went on to make functional use of her prosthesis for activities of daily living, work, and social life at 3 years after injury. We present the patient's own assessment and video recordings, made without influence from rehabilitation personnel that demonstrates this functional use. From this case, we discuss the important factors of a favorable residual limb type, together with targeted modifications made to the prosthesis to optimize function., (Copyright © 2023 International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics.)

Objective: The aim of this study was to characterize the relationship between prosthetic device and service satisfaction, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and functional movement in a diverse population of lower limb prosthesis users., Methods: An online survey was conducted on individuals with lower limb amputation between September and October 2021. Sample validated questionnaires assessing demographic and clinical features, satisfaction, functional outcomes, and quality of life were analyzed using path analysis., Results: Participants were 1736 individuals with lower limb amputation. Overall, 44% of participants reported dissatisfaction with prosthetic device, whereas 37% were dissatisfied with prosthetic service. Low functional mobility was reported by 58% of participants and 61% reported low HRQOL. Lower extremity functional status (β = 0.55), HRQOL (β = 0.08), Activities-specific Balance Scale (β = 0.22), and modified fall efficacy scale (β = -0.07) are significantly associated with prosthetic device satisfaction ( P < 0.0005, R 2 = 0.47). Satisfaction with provider service was significantly associated with lower extremity functional status (β = 0.44) and balance confidence (β = 0.18) ( P < 0.0005, R 2 = 0.34)., Conclusion and Clinical Relevance: Civilians, veterans, and service members reported low functional mobility, low quality of life, and moderate levels of dissatisfaction with their lower extremity prosthetic device and provider service. Improvements in mobility, balance, quality of life, and fall efficacy may enhance device satisfaction. Functional mobility and balance improvements may increase ratings of provider service. This study provides feedback that may improve clinical decisions on lower limb prosthesis patient care., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer incorporated on behalf of The International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics.)

Purpose: To understand how persons with non-dysvascular lower limb amputation (LLA) use occupations to contextualize their quality of life (QoL)., Methods: A qualitative study using an interpretative description approach was conducted. Analysis of the interviews was guided by an occupational perspective, which considers the day-to-day activities that are important to an individual., Results: Twenty adults with an adult-acquired non-dysvascular amputation (e.g., trauma, cancer or infection) were interviewed. Following thematic analysis, two main themes were developed: (1) sense of self expressed through occupations; and (2) sense of belonging with others influenced by occupations. Participants expressed the way they felt about themselves through their activities and placed high value on whether they could participate in certain occupations. Participants also described how their sense of belonging was changed through the context of their changing occupations., Conclusion: The findings from this work can be leveraged by clinicians and researchers alike to improve care for this population. Rehabilitation programs should consider interventions and programming that help to restore occupations or develop new ones given the importance placed on occupations by persons with non-dysvascular LLA.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore self-reported Veterans Affairs (VA) amputation clinician perspectives and clinical practices regarding the measurement and treatment for amputation-related pain., Study Design: Cross-sectional survey with 73 VA rehabilitation clinicians within the VA Health Care System., Results: The most frequent clinical backgrounds of respondents included physical therapists (36%), prosthetists (32%), and physical medicine and rehabilitation specialist (21%). Forty-one clinicians (56%) reported using pain outcome measures with a preference for average pain intensity numeric rating scale (generic) (97%), average phantom limb pain intensity numeric rating scale (80%), or Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain interference (12%) measures. Clinicians' most frequently recommended interventions were compression garments, desensitization, and physical therapy. Clinicians identified mindset, cognition, and motivation as factors that facilitate a patient's response to treatments. Conversely, clinicians identified poor adherence, lack of belief in interventions, and preference for traditional pain interventions (e.g., medications) as common barriers to improvement. We asked about the frequently used treatment of graded motor imagery. Although graded motor imagery was originally developed with 3 phases (limb laterality, explicit motor imagery, mirror therapy), clinicians reported primarily using explicit motor imagery and mirror therapy., Results: Most clinicians who use standardized pain measures prefer intensity ratings. Clinicians select pain interventions based on the patient's presentation. This work contributes to the understanding of factors influencing clinicians' treatment selection for nondrug interventions. Future work that includes qualitative components could further discern implementation barriers to amputation pain rehabilitation interventions for greater consistency in practice., (Copyright © 2023 International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics.)

Background: Lower limb amputation is an emotionally devastating condition that causes a complete change in the quality of life, may lead to phantom limb pain in most of the cases, and puts the individual in a high risk of developing psychological disorders. The objective of this study is to evaluate the consequence of adding virtual reality (VR) to a traditional exercise program on pain, mental status, and psychological status in traumatic unilateral lower limb amputees (LLAs). Methods: Thirty-two traumatic LLAs were randomly assigned into two equal groups in this randomized control trial. Participants did accomplish a postfitting exercise program at least 6 months before enrolment; the control group (CG) underwent a traditional rehabilitation program, and experimental group (EG) had the same program, in addition to VR training. Data were collected before and after 6 weeks of intervention using visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Beck's depression inventory (BDI) for depression, and 12-item short form survey for mental health summary (MHS) and physical health summary (PHS). Results: Thirty-two amputees (29 males and 3 females) were included with mean age in CGs and EG (27.6 ± 4) and (27.6 ± 7.6) years, respectively. Postintervention, the VAS score was significantly reduced only in EG ( P  = 0.003). Both groups showed significant improvement in BDI, MHS, and PHS ( P  < 0.05). However, the EG showed a superior significance in BDI and MHS scores ( P  < 0.05). There was no significance between groups in PHS score. Conclusion: Adding VR to conventional training is beneficial in decreasing pain and in improving depression and MHS of traumatic unilateral LLAs.

Purpose: To explore barriers and facilitators to community reintegration experienced by people following traumatic upper limb amputation (ULA)., Methods: An exploratory qualitative study was conducted with ten adults with major ULA due to trauma. Data from individual, semi-structured interviews was analysed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis., Results: Underlying and influencing community reintegration for participants, was a process of adjustment to the impacts of amputation on everyday function and re-establishing their identity. Participants felt social networks and peer support facilitated the return to social and community activities, as did drawing on personal attributes such as positivity, resilience and self-belief. Prosthetic devices were facilitative for community reintegration by minimising visible differences and unwanted attention through restored cosmesis and in the performance of functional tasks to fulfil social norms and meaningful roles despite issues with comfort and function. Despite the adaptation and evolution of abilities, perspectives and identities, the functional impact of ULA on everyday community activities was an ongoing challenge for all participants., Conclusion: ULA has a significant and lifelong impact on an individual's ability to complete tasks and fulfil meaningful roles in the community. Recommendations based on the study's findings will inform clinicians to support community reintegration for people following traumatic ULA.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore healthcare professionals' (HCPs) perceptions and experiences related to 3D scanning and 3D printing for fabricating lower limb prosthetic sockets., Materials and Methods: This study used a qualitative descriptive approach. Participants were recruited through HCPs' professional associations, social media posts, and snowball sampling. Purposive sampling was used to attain variation in provider type. One-on-one telephone interviews were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide. Inductive thematic analysis was performed to identify the main themes., Results: Three themes were identified: (1) 3D scanning of the residual limb for designing prosthetic sockets is perceived as clean, quick, and convenient; (2) concerns about the strength and safety of 3D printed sockets for long-term use; (3) Adoption of 3D scanning and 3D printing technology for fabricating prosthetic sockets., Conclusion: We identified perceived benefits and challenges with digital technologies for fabricating prosthetic sockets. To increase adoption, more research demonstrating its efficacy compared to conventional methods, increasing 3D printing material quality, and improving software training programs are needed.Implications for Rehabilitation3D printing and 3D scanning are emerging digital technologies that can be used as alternative methods for prosthetic socket manufacturing in the field of rehabilitation.Our research identified perceived benefits of using digital technologies for fabricating prosthetics sockets (3D scanning is perceived as clean, quick, and convenient) and perceived challenges (concerns about the strength and safety of 3D printed sockets for long-term use and a prolonged learning curve).To increase adoption of these digital technologies, more training should be provided to prosthetists and support provided to integrate new processes into staff workloads.

Factors associated with upper limb prosthesis adoption are not well understood. In this study, we explored how prosthesis usability experience relates to the extent of prosthesis adoption through the development of a structural equation model (SEM). First, items related to prosthesis usability were developed and refined using cognitive testing and pilot testing and employed in a survey of 402 prosthesis users (mean age 61.7 (sd 14.4), 77.1% Veterans). The SEM examined two unidimensional latent constructs: Prosthesis Usability Experience and Prosthesis Adoption-and each had multiple measured indicators. SEMs tested direct as well as moderating and mediating effects between the latent constructs and covariates related to demographics and prosthesis type. SEM found a significant positive association between Prosthesis Usability Experience and Extent of Prosthesis Adoption. Several covariates had direct effects on prosthesis adoption: 1) Extent of Prosthesis Adoption was lower for those with transhumeral and shoulder amputation, and higher for those with bilateral amputation, compared to the reference group with unilateral transradial amputation and 2) Myoelectric multiple degree of freedom (multi-DOF) prosthesis use was associated with lower Extent of Prosthesis Adoption, compared to body-powered prosthesis use. Myoelectric multi-DOF use also modified the effect of Prosthesis Usability Experience on Extent of Prosthesis Adoption. For those with bilateral ULA, the strength of the relationship between Prosthesis Usability Experience and Extent of Prosthesis Adoption was reduced. Findings suggest that in order to increase prosthesis adoption, prosthetics developers and rehabilitation providers should focus on implementing strategies to improve prosthesis usability experience. New Prosthesis Usability Experience measures could be used to identify persons at greater risk for poor prosthesis adoption and target interventions to increase prosthesis use., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Opinions, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are those of the author and not necessarily endorsed by the Department of Defense., (Copyright: This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.)

Background: Hip- and pelvic-level amputations are devastating injuries that drastically alter patient function and quality of life. This study examined the experience of military beneficiaries with a hip- or pelvic-level amputation to better characterize their challenges and specific needs and to optimize treatment in the future., Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of the Military Health System and identified 118 patients with a history of one or more amputation(s) at the hip or pelvic level between October 2001 and September 2017. Surviving participants (n = 97) were mailed a letter which explained the details of the study and requested participation in a telephonic interview. A total of six individuals (one female, five males) participated in structured interviews., Results: The study group included four participants with hip disarticulations and two participants with hemipelvectomies (one internal, one external). All six participants reported significant challenges with activities related to prosthetic use, mobility, residual limb health, pain, gastrointestinal and genitourinary function, psychiatric health, and sexual function., Conclusions: These interviews highlight the unique needs of individuals with hip- and pelvic-level amputations and may improve access to higher echelons of care that would enhance the function and quality of life for these participants., (Copyright © 2024 International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics.)

Purpose: Children's and adolescents' level of activity, the type of activity, and other features are special to them and can result in unique experiences with lower-limb prosthesis. The specific objective of this study was to explore the lived experience of children and adolescents with lower-limb loss (LLL) who used a prosthesis., Methods: We used a descriptive qualitative study design and in-depth, semistructured, face-to-face interviews. Accordingly, 35 participants, including children and adolescents with LLL who used a prosthesis, their parents, and prosthetists, were interviewed. The collected data were analyzed thematically., Results: One hundred sixty-eight codes about the experiences of children, parent(s), and prosthetists were extracted from the transcripts and categorized into 32 subthemes. Finally, 7 broad themes including suitability, provoke reactions, intrinsic nature, infrastructures, the school, availability, and parenting role were extracted., Conclusion: The experiences of children and adolescents with lower-limb prosthesis are specific as each may face unique challenges and deal with different difficulties. In this study that has been conducted in a developing country, the main challenges faced by children using lower-limb prosthesis and their parents are the prosthetic components, social reactions, long distance, and costs of services. Moreover, designing a more natural prosthesis and gait training for children with LLL were the most important issues faced by prosthetists. However, close relationships with friends and family members, and children's amazing ability to adapt can aid in facilitating prosthetic management., (Copyright © 2023 International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics.)

Background: Lower limb amputations (LLAs) have long been associated with physical, social, and psychological consequences. Individuals with LLAs have challenges with mobility and often become isolated from their social networks. Disability rehabilitation technologies such as prosthetic devices are used to improve the mobility capabilities of lower limb amputees. To improve clinical outcomes, feedback from the prosthetic users is a key element to consider., Objectives: The study sort to explore the experiences of lower-limb prosthetic users after prosthetic rehabilitation in a prosthetic and orthotic rehabilitation center in the Eastern Region of Ghana., Study Design: This study adopted an exploratory descriptive qualitative study design., Methods: A purposive sampling technique and semistructured interview guide was used to interview 17 participants by the first author. The social model of disability underpinned the study. Lower-limb prosthetic users (≥18 years) with unilateral LLA attending outpatient follow-up at a prosthetic and orthotic rehabilitation center were recruited. The interviews were audio recoded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using the procedure for thematic content analysis by Braun and Clarke (2013)., Results: Participants reported injuries and tingling in their residual limb. Internal stigma resulting from negative comments and labeling from the public were reported. Prosthetic users experienced empathy and being treated as weaklings by their family/peers. Participants avoided relationships because of recurrent rejection, embarrassment, fear of sexual abuse, and exploitation. As a coping method, some participants chose to isolate themselves to avoid humiliation and public disgrace. Other coping mechanisms included watching television, listening to music, conversing with others, ignoring criticism, and having faith in God., Conclusion: Participants' narrative in this study gave insight into the varied lived experiences on the individual level, family/peer level, and the coping mechanisms used. Challenges relating to discomfort from the prosthesis, internal stigma, relationship avoidance, and altered sexual life should be given much attention and used in implementing initiatives to improve clinical outcomes., (Copyright © 2023 International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics.)

Objective: To estimate the prevalence of depression in people with limb amputation. Additionally, factors affecting the prevalence or pattern of depression following limb amputation were explored., Methods: Systematic literature search to identify all relevant studies assessing prevalence of depression following limb amputations was conducted through following databases: PubMed/ MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science. Search period was since inception of database till December 2021. Meta-analyses using random-effects model were conducted to estimate pooled prevalence of depression., Results: A total of 61 studies comprising 9852 limb amputees were included. Pooled prevalence of depression following limb amputations was 33.85% (95% CI: 27.15% to 40.54%), with significant heterogeneity (I 2  = 98.57%; p < 0.001). Sub-group meta-analysis showed that pooled prevalence of depression was significantly higher in studies conducted from middle-income (45.31%, 95% CI: 28.92% to 61.70%) as compared high income countries (28.31%, 95% CI: 23.97% to 32.64%). Greater activity restriction, amputation-related body image disturbances, social discomfort, perceived vulnerability regarding disability, and avoidant coping style were commonly reported factors associated with greater depression symptomatology. Whereas, good perceived social support, and use of more active coping strategies were commonly reported protective factors., Conclusion: About one-third of all limb amputees suffered from clinically significant depression. This emphasizes need to sensitize health care professionals involved in providing care to people following limb amputation regarding the importance of periodically screening this vulnerable group of patients for depression and liaising with psychiatrists. Further, addressing risk factors identified in this review could help in reducing the rates of depression post-amputation., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None declared., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Limited available data suggest that fear of falling (FoF) may be common among lower limb prosthesis users (LLPUs) and associated with negative rehabilitation outcomes. The impact of FoF on outcomes may be exacerbated when fear leads to self-imposed declines in activity. There is a need to identify the validity of fear-of-falling-related activity avoidance scales in LLPUs., Objective: To evaluate the convergent, discriminant, and known-group construct validity of the modified Survey of Activities and FoF in the Elderly (mSAFE) for LLPUs. Secondarily, we sought to determine if the mSAFE scale could be reduced without losing information regarding construct validity., Design: Online survey., Setting: Not applicable., Participants: Fifty-nine persons with unilateral or bilateral amputation at the transtibial or transfemoral level, with ≥6 months experience using a definitive prosthesis for activities other than transfers., Intervention: Participants completed an online survey that consisted of the mSAFE and questions to assess FoF (yes/no), fear-of-falling-related activity avoidance (yes/no), as well as previously validated scales capturing related and unrelated constructs. T-tests were used to compare mSAFE score between yes/no respondents for known-group construct validity. Correlations between mSAFE and previously validated surveys assessed convergent and discriminant validity. Analyses were repeated on a reduced number of mSAFE items following a redundancy analysis., Main Outcome Measures: Not applicable., Results: Significant correlation coefficients of |0.440-0.825| were found for convergent validity with evidence of known-group construct validity (p < .021 for all comparisons). There was evidence for discriminant validity, with non-significant associations for two-of-three correlations. Results from validity analyses for a shortened 6-item mSAFE were similar to that for the full scale., Conclusion: This study provided initial evidence regarding validity of the mSAFE as a measure to assess fear-of-falling-related activity avoidance in LLPUs. A 6-item scale may be appropriate if the full scale would be taxing or time-consuming., (© 2023 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.)

Objective: To examine participants' experiences with peer-support after lower limb loss (LLL) and the associations between the peer-support experience (perceived benefits and barriers) and mobility outcomes., Design: Quantitative and qualitative descriptive study with a cross-sectional design., Setting: National survey (distributed to 169 peer-support groups in 44 states in the US)., Participants: The survey was completed by 82 individuals with a major lower limb amputation (53% female, 54% over 55 years of age; N=82)., Main Outcome Measures: A 32-item survey to examine respondents' experiences in peer-support activities. Prosthetic mobility was measured using the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M)., Results: Two out of 3 respondents received some forms of peer-support after amputation. Among them 75% reported peer-support having a positive effect on their outlook on life, and 78% reported that information gained from peer-support was helpful. Companionship, altruistic acts, and gaining information on how to cope with amputation were the top themes of why respondents enjoyed the peer-support experience. Nearly all (94%) respondents would recommend peer-support to other people with LLL. Individuals who received peer-support exhibited a trend of greater mobility (55th vs 36th percentile on PLUS-M; P=.055)., Conclusion: Individuals with LLL reported generally positive experiences regarding their engagement in peer-support activities. Peer-support groups are viewed as a helpful source for both information and emotional support, potentially benefiting functional and psychological recovery after amputation. Individuals who have received peer-support also exhibited greater mobility., (Copyright © 2024 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Traumatic upper limb amputation (ULA) is a profound injury impacting participation in activities of daily living, including those within the community setting. The objective of this work was to review literature exploring barriers, facilitators, and experiences of community reintegration in adults following traumatic ULA., Methods: Databases were searched using terms synonymous with the amputee population and community participation. Study methodology and reporting were evaluated using McMaster Critical Review Forms, with a convergent segregated approach to synthesis and configuration of the evidence., Results: A total of 21 studies met the inclusion criteria, including quantitative, qualitative and mixed-method study designs. Restoring function and cosmesis with prostheses facilitated work participation, driving and socialisation. Positive work participation was predicted by male gender, younger age, medium-high education level and good general health. Work role and environmental modifications were common, as were vehicle modifications. Qualitative findings provided insight into social reintegration from a psychosocial perspective, particularly negotiating social situations, adjusting to ULA and re-establishing identity. The review findings are limited by the absence of valid outcome measures and clinical heterogeneity across the studies., Conclusion: There is a dearth of literature on community reintegration following traumatic upper limb amputation, indicating a need for further research with strong methodological rigour.Implications for RehabilitationUpper limb amputation can restrict participation in activities in the community including work, socialisation, driving, leisure, and recreation.Clinicians can support community reintegration by addressing personal and environmental factors that both facilitate or inhibit participation in community activities.Prosthetics can be a facilitator for participation in community activities through the restoration of function and cosmesis.Clinicians can facilitate return to work through work modification recommendations or supported transitions to more suitable roles.

ObjectiveTo examine and compare the association between the presence of depression and anxiety symptoms and different sociodemographic and clinical factors including the adjustment to amputation and prosthesis satisfaction among Lebanese individuals with lower limb amputation (LLA). Method: This cross-sectional study was conducted between December 2022 and May 2023 among 72 participants with LLA. Participants completed a questionnaire that included sociodemographic and clinical variables, the revised Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scale (TAPES-R), and the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-25). Result: Using the HSCL depression and anxiety cut-off, 25% of participants were categorized as having depression symptoms, with unemployment being significantly associated ( p -value < .05) with depression. Similarly, 25% were classified as having anxiety symptoms, with both lower education and unemployment ( p -value < .05) significantly linked to anxiety. TAPES-R subscales scores exhibited significant differences between non-depressed and depressed, as well as non-anxious and anxious participants ( p -value < .05). Correlation analysis demonstrated significant relationship between HSCL scales and TAPES-R subscales; lower scores in adjustment to amputation and prosthesis satisfaction were moderately associated with increased rates of depression (r ranging between -0.331 and -0.500, p -values < .005) and increased rates of anxiety symptoms (r ranging between -0.362 and -0.441, p -values < .002). In addition, higher scores in activity limitation were moderately correlated to increased rates of depression and anxiety ( r  = 0.438 for anxiety and 0.490 for depression; p  < .001). Conclusion: Mental health symptoms are associated with educational level, employment status, and adjustment to amputation and prosthesis satisfaction in Lebanese individuals with LLA. These findings should be considered to achieve optimal prosthetic rehabilitation.

Background: There are various factors affecting the use of prostheses. This study was aimed to examine satisfaction, psychological state, quality of life, and the factors affecting these in individuals who use prostheses because of lower-extremity amputation., Methods: Sixty-three patients were included in this study. Demographic data and features related amputation and prosthesis were recorded. Quality of life was evaluated with the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), anxiety and depression levels were evaluated with the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS), body image was evaluated by the Amputee Body Image Scale (ABIS), prosthesis satisfaction was evaluated with the Prosthesis Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ), and the relationship between them was examined., Results: There was a positive correlation between all HADS scores, NHP-emotional reactions, NHP-sleep, NHP-social isolation, NHP-total, and ABIS (P < .05). A negative correlation was found between HADS-anxiety and PSQ results (r = -0.394, P = .003). A positive correlation was found between HADS-depression scores and NHP-pain, NHP-emotional reactions, NHP-social isolation, NHP-total, and ABIS (P < .05); and a negative correlation was found with PSQ questionnaire scores (r = -0.427, P = .001). There was a positive correlation between HADS-total scores and all parameters except NHP-energy level and ABIS (P < .05). A positive correlation was found between ABIS and all parameters except NHP-energy level (P < .05). A negative correlation was found between PSQ and NHP-social isolation, NHP-physical activity, and NHP-total scores (r = -0.312, P = 0.019; r = -0.312, P = .019; and r = -0.277, P = .039, respectively). The presence of residual extremity pain was found to be an effective factor on the psychological state (β = 0.429, P = .001). The presence of residual limb pain and phantom pain were found to be effective factors on the prosthesis satisfaction (β = -0.41, P = .001; and β = -0.406, P = .001, respectively). The presence of residual extremity pain and anxiety level were found independent risk factors on the NHP (β = -0.401, P = .006; and β = -0.445, P = .006, respectively)., Conclusions: Individuals using prostheses because of lower-extremity amputation should be examined in detail from various perspectives.

Purpose: Research highlights the differences and unique experiences of military veterans experiencing amputation compared to civilians. This review aimed to synthesise qualitative research exploring the experience of amputation and rehabilitation among existing or previous members of the military., Methods: A systematic search of six databases (PsycINFO, AMED, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science and Scopus) was undertaken in March 2022. The results of 17 papers reporting 12 studies published between 2009 and 2022 were synthesised using a meta-ethnographic approach to generate new interpretations reflecting the experiences of members of the military who have experienced limb loss., Results: Three themes were developed from the data: (1) Making the physical and psychological transition to life after amputation; (2) The role of the military culture in rehabilitation; and (3) The impact of relationships and the gaze of others during rehabilitation and beyond., Conclusions: Military veterans with limb loss experience difficulties in navigating civilian healthcare systems and gaining appropriate support away from the military. Rehabilitation professionals, with psychological training or mentoring, involved in the care of military veterans following amputation could offer psychological support during the transition to civilian life and targeted therapies to veterans experiencing high levels of pain, and facilitate peer support programmes.

Objective: This study aimed to identify clinical measures that have been used to evaluate function, health related quality of life (HRQoL), and/or satisfaction in children who use lower limb prostheses (LLP). The data reported on psychometric properties for children who use LLP were collected for each measure., Methods: First, PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases were searched using broad search terms to identify standardized outcome measures of function, HRQoL, and/or satisfaction with treatment used in pediatric LLP research published in 2001 or after. For each of the eligible measures found, a second search was performed to identify psychometric properties (e.g., validity, reliability) assessed with children who use LLP., Results: Forty-four standardized outcome measures were identified from 41 pediatric LLP research articles. Five measures (i.e., Gait Outcomes Assessment for Lower Limb Differences, Functional Mobility Assessment, Child Amputee Prosthetics Project- Prosthesis Satisfaction Inventory, Child Amputee Prosthetics Project- Functional Scale Index, and Lower Limb Function Questionnaire) had data on psychometric properties for children who use LLP., Conclusions: Few studies report psychometric data for assessing the overall HRQoL, function, and/or satisfaction for children who use LLP. Further research is needed to validate or create new outcome measures that assess the HRQoL, satisfaction, and/or function of children who use LLP.

Background: Given the funding policies in the Department of Veterans Affairs, the affordability of prostheses may be less of a concern among Veterans as compared to civilians., Objectives: Compare rates of out-of-pocket prosthesis-related payments for Veterans and non-Veterans with upper limb amputation (ULA), develop and validate a measure of prosthesis affordability, and evaluate the impact of affordability on prosthesis nonuse., Study Design: Telephone survey of 727 persons with ULA; 76% Veterans and 24% non-Veterans., Methods: Odds of paying out-of-pocket costs for Veterans compared with non-Veterans were computed using logistic regression. Cognitive and pilot testing resulted in a new scale, evaluated using confirmatory factor and Rasch analysis. Proportions of respondents who cited affordability as a reason for never using or abandoning a prosthesis were calculated., Results: Twenty percent of those who ever used a prosthesis paid out-of-pocket costs. Veterans had 0.20 odds (95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.30) of paying out-of-pocket costs compared with non-Veterans. Confirmatory factor analysis supported unidimensionality of the 4-item Prosthesis Affordability scale. Rasch person reliability was 0.78. Cronbach alpha was 0.87. Overall, 14% of prosthesis never-users said affordability was a reason for nonuse; 9.6% and 16.5% of former prosthesis users said affordability of repairs or replacement, respectively, was a reason for abandonment., Conclusions: Out-of-pocket prosthesis costs were paid by 20% of those sample, with Veterans less likely to incur costs. The Prosthesis Affordability scale developed in this study was reliable and valid for persons with ULA. Prosthesis affordability was a common reason for never using or abandoning prostheses., (Copyright © 2023 International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics.)

Background: High rejection rates of upper limb prosthetics indicate that current prosthetic devices only partially meet user demands. This study therefore investigated the benefits and challenges with current prostheses, associated services and potential areas for improvement from the perspective of upper limb prosthesis users and various professionals working in the field of upper limb and hand prosthetics., Methods and Findings: Seven different focus group discussions were conducted with 32 participants. Participants were grouped by prosthesis type, if they were prosthesis users, or professionals. All focus group discussions were transcribed verbatim, and a summarizing content analysis was performed. Three main topic areas to be addressed emerged from the interviews: 1. a properly functioning prosthesis, 2. the infrastructure, and 3. users' psychological and physical prerequisites. The interaction between a well-functioning prosthesis and a well-developed infrastructure was shown to be important for successful use., Conclusions: Our study raises many of the same issues that have been reported in previous qualitative studies, dating back over several decades. This study underlines the need to include users and professionals in the future development of prosthetic devices., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2023 Einfeldt et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Mirror therapy is a widely used treatment for phantom limb pain (PLP) relief in patients with limb loss. Less common is progressive muscle relaxation (PMR), used mostly in other medical conditions (psychological, terminal cancer pain, etc). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a mirror therapy preceded by PMR intervention compared to mirror therapy preceded by unguided generic relaxation-mirror therapy in patients with lower limb amputation suffering from PLP. This pilot study was a single-blind, controlled, randomized trial. Thirty lower limb amputees suffering from PLP were recruited and randomly assigned to three groups respectively undergoing a PMR-mirror therapy rehabilitative intervention, generic relaxation-mirror therapy, and conventional physiotherapy (ConvPT). Selected items from Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) and the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) were used to test the pain features at the beginning and 1 week after 3 weeks of intervention. A decrease of about 65% was found in the rate and duration of PLP at the PEQ in PMR-mirror therapy with respect to generic relaxation-mirror therapy (about 30%) and ConvPT (about 6%). A decrease of about 90% in intensity (worst and average) of PLP in PMR-mirror therapy when compared to generic relaxation-mirror therapy (about 45%) and ConvPT (about 20%) was found at the BPI. We preliminary concluded, albeit with limitations due to the small sample of patients, that mirror therapy can improve PLP when associated with PMR. Further studies are required to confirm that PMR could be an effective technique for more successful PLP management., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Accepting to undergo amputation is an arduous process often fraught with confusion, fear, and uncertainty. To assess how to best facilitate discussions with at-risk patients, we surveyed lower extremity amputees about their experiences surrounding this decision-making process. Patients who underwent lower extremity amputation at our institution from October 2020 to October 2021 were asked to complete a 5-item telephone survey assessing their decision to undergo amputation and postoperative satisfaction. Retrospective chart review of respondent demographics, comorbidities, operative details, and complications was conducted. Of 89 lower extremity amputees identified, 41 (46.07%) responded to the survey, with the majority undergoing below-knee amputations (n = 34, 82.93%). At a mean follow-up of 5.90 ± 3.45 months, 20 patients (48.78%) were ambulatory. Surveys were completed at a mean of 7.74 ± 4.03 months since amputation. Factors that helped patients decide to undergo amputation included discussions with doctors (n = 32, 78.05%) and concern for worsening health (n = 19, 46.34%). Deteriorating ability to walk (n = 18, 45.00%) was the most common concern prior to surgery. Recommendations by survey respondents to ease the decision-making process included speaking with amputees (n = 9. 22.50%), more discussions with doctors (n = 8, 20.00%), and access to mental health and social services (n = 2, 5.00%); however, many had no recommendations (n = 19, 47.50%), and most were pleased with their decision to undergo amputation (n = 38, 92.68%). Despite most patients primarily citing satisfaction with their decision to undergo lower extremity amputation, it is critical to consider factors that affect patient decisions and recommendations to improve this decision-making process., (Copyright © 2023 the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: First time examination of the physical and psychological long-term outcome following traumatic hemipelvectomy., Methodology: In this study, all patients suffering from traumatic hemipelvectomy that were treated in a level-A trauma center since 1988 were retrospectively evaluated. The authors aimed to compare the physical and psychological outcome following primary amputation (A) vs. limb-preservation (LP) procedures. The patients were examined with a focus on pain, function, mobility and general health. As part of this examination, various scores were recorded, i.e., Majeed Score, Time up & Go or SF-36., Results: The following work showed 13 patients who had suffered a traumatic hemipelvectomy, 8 of whom survived. Five of these were available for subsequent clinical re-examination; of these, three patients underwent an amputation, while limb preservation was performed on two patients. Mean follow-up of the amputee group was after 12 years compared to 6.5 years following limb preservation. After limb preservation, both patients reported phantom limb pain at the affected leg, despite pain medication. The general state of health was assessed as 82/100 (A) and 45/100 (LP). The Majeed score was 61 (A) vs. 45 (LP). In the clinical examination, three out of five patients (2 LP, 1 A) showed peroneal palsy (PP). In the quality-of-life analysis based on the SF12/36 and the NHP, amputees scored higher than the patients who underwent limb preservation surgery., Conclusion: In our small patient cohort, satisfaction, pain and mobility tend to be better following primary amputation compared to limb preserving surgery., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Introduction: The adverse influence of chronic pain on function and psychological health in the general population is well understood. However, the relationship between phantom limb pain (PLP) after limb loss with function and psychological health is less clear. The study purpose was to assess the influences of PLP presence and intensity on function and psychosocial health in individuals with lower-limb loss (LLL)., Methods: One hundred two individuals with major LLL completed a study-specific questionnaire on the presence and intensity of their PLP. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System -29 questionnaire was also administered., Results: Of 102 participants, 64% reported PLP, with a mean intensity of 4.8 ± 2.3 out of 10. Individuals with vs. without PLP demonstrated significantly greater sleep disturbances ( p = 0.03), whereas the differences in function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, or ability to participate in social roles and activities were not statistically different between groups ( p > 0.05). Of note, mean scores for many of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 short forms among the current sample were similar to the mean of the general population, minimizing the potential clinical impact of PLP on these domains., Conclusions: Our findings indicate a lack of meaningful associations between PLP presence or intensity with function, and psychosocial health among individuals with LLL. These findings conflict with previous research suggesting an adverse relationship between PLP, function, and psychosocial health after limb loss., (Copyright © 2023 International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics.)

Background and Objective: Phantom limb pain (PLP) concerns >50% of amputees and has a negative impact on their rehabilitation, mental health and quality of life. Mirror therapy (MT) is a promising strategy, but its effectiveness remains controversial. We performed a systematic review to: (i) evaluate the effectiveness of MT versus placebo in reducing PLP, and (ii) determine MT effect on disability and quality of life., Databases and Data Treatment: We selected randomized-controlled trials in five databases (Medline, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PEDro and Embase) that included patients with unilateral lower or upper limb amputation and PLP and that compared the effects on PLP of MT versus a placebo technique. The primary outcome was PLP intensity changes and the secondary outcomes were PLP duration, frequency, patients' disability and quality of life., Results: Among the five studies included, only one reported a significant difference between the MT group and control group, with a positive MT effect at week 4. Only one study assessed MT effect on disability and found a significant improvement in the MT group at week 10 and month 6., Conclusions: Our systematic review did not allow concluding that MT reduces PLP and disability in amputees. This lack of strong evidence is probably due to (i) the low methodological quality of the included studies, and (ii) the lack of statistical power. Future trials should include a higher number of patients, increase the number and frequency of MT sessions, have a long-term follow-up and improve the methodological quality., Significance: Recent meta-analyses concluded that MT is effective for reducing phantom limb pain. Conversely, the present systematic review that included only studies with the best level of evidence did not find any evidence about its effectiveness for this condition. We identified many ways to improve future randomized-controlled trials on this topic: increasing the number of participants, reducing the intra-group heterogeneity, using a suitable placebo and intensifying the MT sessions and frequency., (© 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Pain published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Pain Federation - EFIC ®.)

Background: The development of bionic legs has seen substantial improvements in the past years but people with lower-limb amputation still suffer from impairments in mobility (e.g., altered balance and gait control) due to significant limitations of the contemporary prostheses. Approaching the problem from a human-centered perspective by focusing on user-specific needs can allow identifying critical improvements that can increase the quality of life. While there are several reviews of user needs regarding upper limb prostheses, a comprehensive summary of such needs for those affected by lower limb loss does not exist., Methods: We have conducted a systematic review of the literature to extract important needs of the users of lower-limb prostheses. The review included 56 articles in which a need (desire, wish) was reported explicitly by the recruited people with lower limb amputation (N = 8149)., Results: An exhaustive list of user needs was collected and subdivided into functional, psychological, cognitive, ergonomics, and other domain. Where appropriate, we have also briefly discussed the developments in prosthetic devices that are related to or could have an impact on those needs. In summary, the users would like to lead an independent life and reintegrate into society by coming back to work and participating in social and leisure activities. Efficient, versatile, and stable gait, but also support to other activities (e.g., sit to stand), contribute to safety and confidence, while appearance and comfort are important for the body image. However, the relation between specific needs, objective measures of performance, and overall satisfaction and quality of life is still an open question., Conclusions: Identifying user needs is a critical step for the development of new generation lower limb prostheses that aim to improve the quality of life of their users. However, this is not a simple task, as the needs interact with each other and depend on multiple factors (e.g., mobility level, age, gender), while evolving in time with the use of the device. Hence, novel assessment methods are required that can evaluate the impact of the system from a holistic perspective, capturing objective outcomes but also overall user experience and satisfaction in the relevant environment (daily life)., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Phantom limb syndrome is a debilitating complication after extremity amputation that poses significant challenges to recovery. This study aims to examine the relationship between phantom limb syndrome and mental and physical comorbidities, including a comparison between phantom limb pain and phantom limb syndrome without pain in below knee amputees., Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent below knee amputation of the lower extremity in the PearlDiver database, as identified using CPT codes. Analysis was carried out to evaluate the absence or presence of phantom limb syndrome. Matched bivariate analysis accounting for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, and region was used to assess whether the presence of pain in phantom limb syndrome patients was associated with increased comorbidity., Results: In total, 44,028 patients with below knee amputation were examined: 95% (42,493 patients) did not develop phantom limb syndrome while 4.8% (1,535 patients) of patients did develop phantom limb syndrome. Phantom limb syndrome was significantly associated with increased odds of coexistent major depressive disorder (OR = 1.86, p <0.0001), generalized anxiety disorder (OR = 2.14, p = 0.04), posttraumatic stress disorder (OR = 1.7, p <0.0001), suicidal ideation (OR = 1.62, p <0.0001), obesity (OR = 1.28, p = 0.0007), osteoarthritis (OR = 1.53, p <0.0001), osteoporosis (OR = 1.64, p <0.0001), and low back pain (OR = 2.31, p <0.0001). Analysis of patient cohorts of phantom limb syndrome with pain and those without pain did not reveal a statistically significant relationship between the presence of pain and any dependent variable., Conclusions: This investigation of over 44,000 patients with below knee amputation revealed that patients with phantom limb syndrome exhibit significantly higher rate of psychiatric comorbidities compared to those without documented phantom limb pain. Suicidal ideation, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder were especially common, and consequently a multi-disciplinary approach to management is essential., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The aim of this study is to analyse the effectiveness of the Graded Motor Imagery (GraMI) protocol in phantom limb pain in amputee patients., Materials and Methods: A randomised clinical trial will be conducted, with two parallel groups and simple blinding, and a phenomenological study with semi-structured interviews. People over the age of 18, with amputation of one limb, with a minimum score of 3 on the visual analogue scale of pain, who are pharmacologically stable and have been discharged from hospital, will be recruited. An initial assessment, a post-intervention assessment (9 weeks) and a follow-up assessment (12 weeks post-intervention) will be performed, in which pain, quality of life, functionality and psychological aspects will be assessed. The aim of the qualitative study is to find out about the experience of living with phantom limb pain and to identify the satisfaction with the intervention. A descriptive, univariate and bivariate quantitative statistical analysis will be performed using the SPSS program, with a 95% confidence level and a statistical significance level of p < 0.05. The qualitative analysis will be carried out using the Atlas.ti 8.0 program, where the different interviews will be analysed, coded and categorised., Discussion: The GraMI protocol allows the patient to work on motor learning through brain reorganisation, analytical movements, sensory stimulation, and functional activities. In addition, it can help to standardise the use of graded motor imagery in future studies and in clinical practice with this patient profile., Trial Registration: NCT05083611., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Background: Various literature have dealt with the physical aspect of amputation and the functional outcome after amputation. There are a few studies that give focused attention to the quality of life (QOL) of amputees. These studies are mostly from the developed countries. This study analyzed amputation as a whole and how it affects an individual physically, psychologically, emotionally, and socially, which would enable the health care providers to help the amputees to attain a better QOL., Study Design: Cross-sectional study., Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on lower limb amputees. Data were collected using a proforma for demographic details and two pretested questionnaires-the World Health Organization QOL-Bref and prostheses-specific Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales-Revised questionnaires. The data were analyzed using SPSS software, version 20., Results: Amputation significantly affects all domains of the QOL. Age was a significant determinant of QOL of amputees, and it was found that the QOL decreased with an increase in age. 48.1% of the amputees were using a prosthetic device, and they were found to have a significantly better QOL. The prevalence of residual limb pain and phantom limb pain was 52.9% and 37%, respectively., Conclusion: Nearly half of the population perceived that their QOL was neither poor nor good. The QOL of the physical domain was better than the other domains. The most important factors that were found to be associated with QOL of amputees were age, duration since amputation, and use of prosthesis., (Copyright © 2022 International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics.)

Introduction: Diabetes mellitus is one of the most common chronic diseases with a high number of sufferers worldwide. Diabetic neuropathy and diabetic angiopathy lead to serious infectious complications which are very difficult to combat and may finally lead to the amputation of a lower limb. The aim of the study was to evaluate the quality of life, the level of acceptance of the illness and the nutritional status of patients after lower limb amputation due to diabetes., Methods: Ninety-nine patients (23 men and 76 women) were enrolled into the study. They had all undergone lower limb amputation due to diabetic foot and were treated in the Department of General and Oncological Surgery. The following questionnaires were used: the WHO Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF), the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), the Acceptance of Illness Scale (AIS) and the anonymous specific socio-demographic characteristics questionnaire., Results: The diabetes-related amputees were revealed to have a higher QoL within the social domain (mean score 64.48), an intermediate QoL - within the environmental domain (mean score 63.04) and the mental domain (mean score 59.61), and a lower QoL - within physical (somatic) domain (mean score 54.69). There was no statistical correlation between genders or between all the domains of QoL (P > 0.05). The mean MNA score was 22.66, which means that patients were at risk of malnutrition. There were statistical differences between women and men as regards nutritional status (P = 0.034). The mean AIS score was 27.65 (27.09 women and 29.48 men), which means that the respondents accept their disease. There was no statistical correlation between gender and the acceptance of the disease (P = 0.288). There was not statistical correlation between age and QoL (P > 0.05). There were statistical differences between age and nutritional status (P < 0.05), and between age and acceptance of the illness (P = 0.044)., Conclusions: The better the quality of life was in all the domains, the better the level of acceptance of illness was. The less malnourished the patient was, the better their quality of life was in all the domains., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Recent advances in upper limb prosthetics include sensory restoration techniques and osseointegration technology that introduce additional risks, higher costs, and longer periods of rehabilitation. To inform regulatory and clinical decision making, validated patient reported outcome measures are required to understand the relative benefits of these interventions. The Patient Experience Measure (PEM) was developed to quantify psychosocial outcomes for research studies on sensory-enabled upper limb prostheses. While the PEM was responsive to changes in prosthesis experience in prior studies, its psychometric properties had not been assessed. Here, the PEM was examined for structural validity and reliability across a large sample of people with upper limb loss (n = 677). The PEM was modified and tested in three phases: initial refinement and cognitive testing, pilot testing, and field testing. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to discover the underlying factor structure of the PEM items and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) verified the structure. Rasch partial credit modeling evaluated monotonicity, fit, and magnitude of differential item functioning by age, sex, and prosthesis use for all scales. EFA resulted in a seven-factor solution that was reduced to the following six scales after CFA: social interaction, self-efficacy, embodiment, intuitiveness, wellbeing, and self-consciousness. After removal of two items during Rasch analyses, the overall model fit was acceptable (CFI = 0.973, TLI = 0.979, RMSEA = 0.038). The social interaction, self-efficacy and embodiment scales had strong person reliability (0.81, 0.80 and 0.77), Cronbach's alpha (0.90, 0.80 and 0.71), and intraclass correlation coefficients (0.82, 0.85 and 0.74), respectively. The large sample size and use of contemporary measurement methods enabled identification of unidimensional constructs, differential item functioning by participant characteristics, and the rank ordering of the difficulty of each item in the scales. The PEM enables quantification of critical psychosocial impacts of advanced prosthetic technologies and provides a rigorous foundation for future studies of clinical and prosthetic interventions., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.