Search

Objectives: To systematically review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and perform a meta-analysis comparing early amniotomy with delayed amniotomy in individuals undergoing pre-induction cervical ripening by Foley balloon. The primary outcome was the rate of cesarean delivery. Understanding the impact of the timing of amniotomy on the rate of cesarean delivery is crucial for obstetricians and healthcare providers when making decisions about the management of labor induction., Data Sources: Data were sourced from electronic databases, including PubMed, OVID, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov through February 2024. The review adhered to Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (ID CRD42023454520)., Study Eligibility Criteria: Inclusion criteria comprised RCTs comparing early amniotomy with delayed amniotomy in individuals undergoing cervical ripening by Foley balloon. Early amniotomy was defined as amniotomy soon after cervical ripening. Delayed amniotomy was defined as withholding amniotomy until after the onset of the active phase of labor, until at least 4 hours from either initiation of oxytocin or Foley balloon removal/expulsion, or until achieving >4 cm of dilation. Participants included nulliparous or multiparous individuals with singleton pregnancies undergoing labor induction at 37 weeks or later., Study Appraisal and Synthesis: A systematic literature search was conducted using defined search terms including "early amniotomy," "delayed amniotomy," "induction of labor," "cervical ripening," and "Foley balloon," and "Foley catheter." The quality of the included trials was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was cesarean delivery. Secondary outcomes included outcomes related to labor duration and neonatal outcomes. Pooled relative risks (RR) and weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated., Results: Five trials involving 849 participants undergoing induction and cervical ripening by Foley balloon were included. The rate of cesarean delivery did not differ between individuals randomly assigned to the early amniotomy group compared with those assigned to the delayed amniotomy group (22.9% vs. 23.3%; RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.65-1.55). Early amniotomy compared to delayed amniotomy was associated with a higher proportion of delivery within 24 hours (79.9% vs. 67.1%; RR 1.19; 95% CI 1.04-1.36). Early amniotomy compared with delayed amniotomy was associated with a shorter interval from oxytocin to delivery (WMD -1.5 hours; 95% CI -2.1 to -0.8), from Foley expulsion to vaginal delivery (WMD -2.5 hours; 95% CI -4.8 to -0.1), and from the start of oxytocin to vaginal delivery (WMD -1.8 hours; 95% CI -3.2 to -0.4). Other outcomes were not significantly different., Conclusion: Early amniotomy following cervical ripening by Foley balloon in individuals with singleton pregnancies did not impact rates of cesarean delivery compared with delayed amniotomy but led to shorter duration for various labor progress outcomes., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The optimal timing of amniotomy during labor induction is a topic of ongoing debate due to the potential risks associated with both amniotomy and prolonged labor. As such, individuals in the field of obstetrics and gynecology must carefully evaluate the associated benefits and drawbacks of this procedure. While amniotomy can expedite the labor process, it may also lead to complications such as umbilical cord prolapse, fetal distress, and infection. Therefore, a careful and thorough examination of the risks and benefits of amniotomy during labor induction is essential in making an informed decision regarding the optimal timing of this procedure., Objective: This study aimed to determine if an amniotomy within 2 hours after Foley balloon removal reduced the duration of active labor and time taken to achieve vaginal delivery when compared with an amniotomy ≥4 hours after balloon removal among term pregnant women who underwent labor induction., Study Design: This was an open-label, randomized controlled trial that was conducted at a single academic center from October 2020 to March 2023. Term participants who were eligible for preinduction cervical ripening with a Foley balloon were randomized into 2 groups, namely the early amniotomy (rupture of membranes within 2 hours after Foley balloon removal) and delayed amniotomy (rupture of membranes performed more than 4 hours after Foley balloon removal) groups. Randomization was stratified by parity. The primary outcome was time from Foley balloon insertion to active phase of labor. Secondary outcomes, including time to delivery, cesarean delivery rates, and maternal and neonatal complications, were analyzed using intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses., Results: Of the 150 participants who consented and were enrolled, 149 were included in the analysis. In the intention-to-treat population, an early amniotomy did not significantly shorten the time between Foley balloon insertion and active labor when compared with a delayed amniotomy (885 vs 975 minutes; P=.08). An early amniotomy was associated with a significantly shorter time from Foley balloon placement to active labor in nulliparous individuals (1211; 584-2340 vs 1585; 683-2760; P=.02). When evaluating the secondary outcomes, an early amniotomy was associated with a significantly shorter time to active labor onset (312.5 vs 442.5 minutes; P=.02) and delivery (484 vs 587 minutes; P=.03) from Foley balloon removal with a higher rate of delivery within 36 hours (96% vs 85%; P=.03). Individuals in the early amniotomy group reached active labor 1.5 times faster after Foley balloon insertion than those in the delayed group (hazard ratio, 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-2.2; P=.02). Those with an early amniotomy also reached vaginal delivery 1.5 times faster after Foley balloon removal than those in the delayed group (hazard ratio, 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1-2.2; P=.03). A delayed amniotomy was associated with a higher rate of postpartum hemorrhage (0% vs 9.5%; P=.01). No significant differences were observed in the cesarean delivery rates, length of hospital stay, maternal infection, or neonatal outcomes., Conclusion: Although an early amniotomy does not shorten the time from Foley balloon insertion to active labor, it shortens time from Foley balloon removal to active labor and delivery without increasing complications. The increased postpartum hemorrhage rate in the delayed amniotomy group suggests increased risks with delayed amniotomy., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: There is evidence to suggest that early amniotomy during induction of labor is advantageous. However, following cervical ripening balloon removal, the cervix remains less effaced and the utility of amniotomy in this setting is less clear. We investigated whether cervical effacement at the time of amniotomy impacts outcomes among nulliparas undergoing induction of labor., Study Design: This was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort of singleton, term, nulliparous patients at a tertiary care center undergoing induction of labor and amniotomy. The primary outcome was completion of the first stage of labor. Secondary outcomes were vaginal delivery and postpartum hemorrhage. Outcomes were compared between patients with cervical effacement ≤50% (low effacement) and >50% (high effacement) at time of amniotomy. Multivariable logistic regression was used calculate risk ratios (RR) to adjust for confounders including cervical dilation. Stratified analysis was performed in patients with cervical ripening balloon use. A post hoc sensitivity analysis was performed to further control for cervical dilation., Results: Of 1,256 patients, 365 (29%) underwent amniotomy at low effacement. Amniotomy at low effacement was associated with reduced likelihood of completing the first stage (aRR: 0.87 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.78-0.95]) and vaginal delivery (aRR: 0.87 [95% CI: 0.77-0.96]). Although amniotomy at low effacement was associated with lower likelihood of completing the first stage in all-comers, those who had amniotomy performed at low effacement following cervical ripening balloon expulsion were at the highest risk (aRR: 0.84 [95% CI: 0.69-0.98], p for interaction = 0.04) In the post hoc sensitivity analysis, including patients who underwent amniotomy at 3- or 4-cm dilation, low cervical effacement remained associated with a lower likelihood of completing the first stage of labor., Conclusion: Low cervical effacement at time of amniotomy, particularly following cervical ripening balloon expulsion, is associated with a lower likelihood of successful induction., Key Points: · Low cervical effacement at amniotomy was associated with lower rates of complete dilation.. · Effacement at amniotomy is especially important for patients who had a cervical ripening balloon.. · Providers should consider cervical effacement when timing amniotomy for nulliparous term patients.., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: Vaginal examination to monitor labor progress is recommended at least every 4 hours, but it can cause pain and embarrassment to women. Trial data are limited on the best intensity for vaginal examination. Vaginal examination is not needed for oxytocin dose titration after an amniotomy has been performed and oxytocin infusion started. The Foley balloon commonly ripens the cervix without strong contractions. Amniotomy and oxytocin infusion are usually required to drive labor., Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the first vaginal examination at 8 vs 4 hours after amniotomy-oxytocin after Foley ripening in multiparous labor induction., Study Design: A randomized controlled trial was conducted from October 2021 to September 2022 at the University Malaya Medical Center, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Multiparas at term were recruited at admission for labor induction. Participants were randomized to a first routine vaginal examination at 8 or 4 hours after Foley balloon ripening and amniotomy. Titrated oxytocin infusion was routinely commenced after amniotomy to initiate contractions. The 2 primary outcomes were the time from amniotomy to delivery (noninferiority hypothesis) and maternal satisfaction (superiority hypothesis). Data were analyzed using the Student t test, Mann-Whitney U test, and chi-square test (or Fisher exact test), as suitable for the data., Results: A total of 204 women were randomized, 102 to each arm. Amniotomy to birth intervals were 4.97±2.47 hours in the 8-hour arm and 5.79±3.17 hours in the 4-hour arm (mean difference, -0.82; 97.5% confidence interval, -1.72 to 0.08; P=.041; Bonferroni correction), which were noninferior within the prespecified 2-hour upper margin, and the maternal satisfaction scores (11-point 0-10 numerical rating scale) with allocated labor care were 9 (interquartile range, 8-9) in the 8-hour arm and 8 (interquartile range, 7-9) in the 4-hour arm (P=.814). In addition, oxytocin infusion to birth interval difference was noninferior within the 97.5% confidence interval (-1.59 to 0.23) margin of 1.3 hours. Of the maternal outcomes, the amniotomy to first vaginal examination intervals were 3.9±1.8 hours in the 8-hour arm and 3.4±1.3 hours in the 4-hour arm (P=.026), and the numbers of vaginal examinations were 2.00 (interquartile range, 2.00-3.00) in the 8-hour arm and 3.00 (interquratile range, 2.00-3.25) in the 4-hour arm (P<.001). For the 8-hour arm, the first vaginal examination was less likely to be as scheduled and more likely to be indicated by sensation to bear down (P<.001), and the epidural analgesia rates were lower (13/102 participants [12.7%] in the 8-hour arm vs 28/102 participants [27.5%] in the 4-hour arm; relative risk, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.84; P=.009). Other outcomes of the mode of delivery, indications for cesarean delivery, and delivery blood loss were not different. Neonatal outcomes were not different., Conclusion: Routine first vaginal examination at 8 hours compared with that at 4 hours was noninferior for the time to birth but did not improve maternal satisfaction., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The aim of the study is to evaluate the association between amniotomy at various time points during labor induction and maternal and neonatal outcomes among term, nulliparous women., Study Design: Secondary analysis of a randomized trial of term labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk, nulliparous women (2014-2017) was conducted. Women met inclusion criteria if they underwent induction ≥38 weeks' gestation using oxytocin with documented time and type of membrane rupture. Women with antepartum stillbirth or fetal anomaly were excluded. The primary outcome was cesarean delivery. Secondary outcomes included maternal and neonatal complications. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared among women with amniotomy versus women with intact membranes and no amniotomy at six 2-hour time intervals: before oxytocin initiation, 0 to <2 hours after oxytocin, 2 to <4 hours after, 4 to <6 hours after, 6 to <8 hours after, and 8 to <10 hours after. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for maternal age, body mass index, race/ethnicity, modified Bishop score on admission, treatment group, and hospital (as a random effect)., Results: Of 6,106 women in the parent trial, 2,854 (46.7%) women met inclusion criteria. Of these 2,340 (82.0%) underwent amniotomy, and majority of the women had amniotomy performed between 2 and <6 hours after oxytocin. Cesarean delivery was less frequent among women with amniotomy 6 to <8 hours after oxytocin compared with women without amniotomy (21.9 vs. 29.7%; adjusted odds ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.42-0.89). Amniotomy at time intervals ≥4 hours after oxytocin was associated with lower odds of labor duration >24 hours. Amniotomy at time intervals ≥2 hours and <8 hours after oxytocin was associated with lower odds of maternal hospitalization >3 days. Amniotomy was not associated with postpartum or neonatal complications., Conclusion: Among a contemporary cohort of nulliparous women undergoing term labor induction, amniotomy was associated with either lower or similar odds of cesarean delivery and other adverse outcomes, compared with no amniotomy., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To assess if delayed amniotomy during labor induction is associated with adverse delivery outcomes., Study Design: Retrospective cohort study of women with a viable, singleton gestation who underwent labor induction at a tertiary-care hospital (4/2014-3/2017). Women were excluded if oxytocin was not used or if spontaneous rupture of membranes (ROM) occurred ≤8 h after oxytocin initiation. The primary outcome was cesarean delivery, and secondary outcomes included postpartum hemorrhage, maternal infectious morbidity, neonatal 5-min Apgar score <7, and neonatal intensive care unit admission. Women were compared by timing of amniotomy: delayed (ROM > 8 h after oxytocin initiation) versus not delayed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the association between delayed amniotomy and study outcomes., Results: Of 2081 women who met inclusion criteria, 1125 (before 54%) had delayed amniotomy. Women with delayed amniotomy had ROM 12.7 h (IQR 10.0, 17.9) after oxytocin versus 5.0 h (IQR 3.7, 6.5) without delayed amniotomy. In multivariable regression, delayed amniotomy was associated with increasingly higher odds of cesarean as maternal obesity severity increased (aOR 1.58, 95 %CI 1.24-2.03 at BMI 30 kg/m 2 ; aOR 2.15, 95 %CI 1.45-3.21 at BMI 40 kg/m 2 ; aOR 2.93, 95 %CI 1.54-5.57 at BMI 50 kg/m 2 )., Conclusion: Delayed amniotomy >8 h after starting oxytocin for labor induction was associated with higher odds of cesarean delivery. Significant delay in ROM should be avoided during labor induction., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Labor augmentation is a commonly used strategy in obstetrics to make labor more efficient or to increase the chance of achieving a vaginal delivery. Intravenous infusion of synthetic oxytocin and early amniotomy are the most widely used methods, but there is considerable variation in how they are used in clinical practice. There remain significant differences in the timing, dosing, and administration of synthetic oxytocin across institutions. The use and timing of amniotomy is similarly controversial. Much of the clinical variation in augmentation practices stem from the significant heterogeneity that exists in the literature, as well as the lack of an optimal strategy that has been subjected to the scientific scrutiny needed to prove its superiority in both efficacy and safety. Further research is needed to allow for better standardized care of women presenting in spontaneous labor., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The author reports no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Labor is induced in 20-30% of maternities, with an increasing trend of use. Labor induction with oral misoprostol is associated with reduced risk of cesarean deliveries and has a safety and effectiveness profile comparable to those of mechanical methods such as Foley catheter use. Labor induction in nulliparous women continues to be challenging, with the process often quite protracted. The eventual cesarean delivery rate is high, particularly when the cervix is unfavorable and ripening is required. Vaginal examination can cause discomfort and emotional distress particularly to nulliparous women, and plausibly can affect patient satisfaction with the induction and birth process., Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate regular (4-hourly prior to each oral misoprostol dose with amniotomy when feasible) compared with restricted (only if indicated) vaginal assessments during labor induction with oral misoprostol in term nulliparous women MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a randomized trial between November 2016 and September 2017 in a university hospital in Malaysia. Our oral misoprostol labor induction regimen comprised 50 μg of misoprostol administered 4 hourly for up to 3 doses in the first 24 hours. Participants assigned to regular assessment had vaginal examinations before each 4-hourly misoprostol dose with a view to amniotomy as soon as it was feasible. Participants in the restricted arm had vaginal examinations only if indicated. Primary outcomes were patient satisfaction with the birth process (using an 11-point visual numerical rating scale), induction to vaginal delivery interval, and vaginal delivery rate at 24 hours., Results: Data from 204 participants (101 regular, 103 restricted) were analyzed. The patient satisfaction score with the birth process was as follows (median [interquartile range]): 7 [6-9] vs 8 [6-10], P = .15. The interval of induction to vaginal delivery (mean ± standard deviation) was 24.3 ± 12.8 vs 31.1 ± 15.0 hours (P = .013). The vaginal delivery rate at 24 hours was 27.7% vs 20.4%; (relative risk [RR], 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8-2.3; P = .14) for the regular vs restricted arms, respectively. The cesarean delivery rate was 50% vs 43% (RR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.9-1.5; P = .36). When assessed after delivery, participants' fidelity to their assigned vaginal examination schedule in a future labor induction was 45% vs 88% (RR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.4-0.7; P < .001), and they would recommend their assigned schedule to a friend (47% vs 87%; RR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.5-0.7; P < .001) in the regular compared with the restricted arms, respectively., Conclusion: Despite a shorter induction to vaginal delivery interval with regular vaginal examination and a similar vaginal delivery rate at 24 hours and birth process satisfaction score, women expressed a higher preference for the restricted examination schedule and were more likely to recommend such a schedule to a friend., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: In full-term patients, early artificial rupture of membranes (AROMs) decreases time in labor. We assessed the impact of early AROM in preterm patients undergoing indicated induction of labor., Study Design: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing indicated preterm induction (23-34 weeks) at a single tertiary care center from 2011 to 2014. Early AROM was defined as <4 cm and late AROM was defined as ≥4 cm. The primary outcomes evaluated were cesarean delivery and time in labor. Secondary outcomes were chorioamnionitis and a composite of maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes., Results: Of the 149 women included, 65 (43.6%) had early AROM. Early AROM was associated with an increased time from the start of induction to delivery (25.7 ± 13.0 vs. 19.0 ± 10.3 hours, p  < 0.01) and with an increase in the risk of cesarean (53.4 vs. 22.6%, adjusted odds ratio: 3.5, 95% confidence interval: 1.60-7.74). Early AROM was not associated with an increased risk of chorioamnionitis or adverse maternal or fetal outcomes., Conclusion: In this observational cohort, early AROM was associated with an increased risk of cesarean. A randomized controlled trial is necessary to determine the optimal timing of AROM in preterm patients requiring delivery., Competing Interests: None., (Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.)

Labor is defined as contractions with cervical change and active labor starts when the cervix is dilated 6 cm. Updated labor curves and definitions should be used to define labor dystocia. Oxytocin and amniotomy have important roles in the management of labor dystocia. Structured intermittent fetal monitoring should be considered for women with low-risk pregnancies but continuous electronic fetal monitoring still is used most commonly. Moderate fetal heart rate variability is the most reliable marker of fetal well-being. Epidural analgesia is used in more than half of all births in the United States. It is not associated with an increase in the rate of cesarean deliveries but is associated with a longer second stage of labor. Interventions that may reduce the need for cesarean delivery include use of the new definitions of labor dystocia, a trial of manual rotation of occiput posterior presentations, use of cervical ripening agents for induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix, and encouragement of women with previous cesarean deliveries to attempt vaginal delivery., (Written permission from the American Academy of Family Physicians is required for reproduction of this material in whole or in part in any form or medium.)

Background: This secondary analysis for the Twin Birth Study, an international, multicenter trial, aimed to compare the cesarean section rates and safety between methods of induction of labor in twin pregnancies., Methods: Women with twin pregnancies where the first twin was in a cephalic presentation and who presented for labor induction, were non-randomly assigned to receive prostaglandin or amniotomy and/or oxytocin. Main outcome measures were the rates of unplanned cesarean section and neonatal and maternal mortality or serious morbidity., Results: 153 (41.5%) were induced by prostaglandin (prostaglandin group) and 215 (58.5%) were induced by amniotomy and/or oxytocin alone (no prostaglandin group). Induction using prostaglandin was more common in countries with a low perinatal mortality rate <10/1000 (45.7 versus 32.5%, p = 0.02). Cesarean section rates were similar in the two groups: 62/153 (40.5%) in the prostaglandin group and 87/215 (40.5%) in the no prostaglandin group (odds ratio 1, 95% CI 0.65-1.5). Nulliparity, late maternal age, non-cephalic presentation of twin B and high country's perinatal mortality rate were found to be independently associated with the induction to end with an unplanned cesarean section. There were no significant differences between groups with respect to maternal or neonatal adverse outcomes., Conclusions: The need for cervical ripening by prostaglandin had no effect on the incidence of cesarean delivery or an abnormal outcome. There is a significant risk of unplanned cesarean section independent of chosen induction method., Trial Registration: This trial was registered at the International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Register (identifier ISRCTN74420086 ; December 9, 2003) and retrospectively registered at the www.clinicaltrials.gov (identifier NCT 00187369 ; September 12, 2005).

Background: More than 150,000 pregnant women in England and Wales have their labour induced each year. Multiple pharmacological, mechanical and complementary methods are available to induce labour., Objective: To assess the relative effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of labour induction methods and, data permitting, effects in different clinical subgroups., Methods: We carried out a systematic review using Cochrane methods. The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register was searched (March 2014). This contains over 22,000 reports of controlled trials (published from 1923 onwards) retrieved from weekly searches of OVID MEDLINE (1966 to current); Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library); EMBASE (1982 to current); Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (1984 to current); ClinicalTrials.gov; the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Portal; and hand-searching of relevant conference proceedings and journals. We included randomised controlled trials examining interventions to induce labour compared with placebo, no treatment or other interventions in women eligible for third-trimester induction. We included outcomes relating to efficacy, safety and acceptability to women. In addition, for the economic analysis we searched the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and Economic Evaluations Databases, NHS Economic Evaluation Database and the Health Technology Assessment database. We carried out a network meta-analysis (NMA) using all of the available evidence, both direct and indirect, to produce estimates of the relative effects of each treatment compared with others in a network. We developed a de novo decision tree model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of various methods. The costs included were the intervention and other hospital costs incurred (price year 2012-13). We reviewed the literature to identify preference-based utilities for the health-related outcomes in the model. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, expected costs, utilities and net benefit. We represent uncertainty in the optimal intervention using cost-effectiveness acceptability curves., Results: We identified 1190 studies; 611 were eligible for inclusion. The interventions most likely to achieve vaginal delivery (VD) within 24 hours were intravenous oxytocin with amniotomy [posterior rank 2; 95% credible intervals (CrIs) 1 to 9] and higher-dose (≥ 50 µg) vaginal misoprostol (rank 3; 95% CrI 1 to 6). Compared with placebo, several treatments reduced the odds of caesarean section, but we observed considerable uncertainty in treatment rankings. For uterine hyperstimulation, double-balloon catheter had the highest probability of being among the best three treatments, whereas vaginal misoprostol (≥ 50 µg) was most likely to increase the odds of excessive uterine activity. For other safety outcomes there were insufficient data or there was too much uncertainty to identify which treatments performed 'best'. Few studies collected information on women's views. Owing to incomplete reporting of the VD within 24 hours outcome, the cost-effectiveness analysis could compare only 20 interventions. The analysis suggested that most interventions have similar utility and differ mainly in cost. With a caveat of considerable uncertainty, titrated (low-dose) misoprostol solution and buccal/sublingual misoprostol had the highest likelihood of being cost-effective., Limitations: There was considerable uncertainty in findings and there were insufficient data for some planned subgroup analyses., Conclusions: Overall, misoprostol and oxytocin with amniotomy (for women with favourable cervix) is more successful than other agents in achieving VD within 24 hours. The ranking according to safety of different methods was less clear. The cost-effectiveness analysis suggested that titrated (low-dose) oral misoprostol solution resulted in the highest utility, whereas buccal/sublingual misoprostol had the lowest cost. There was a high degree of uncertainty as to the most cost-effective intervention., Future Work: Future trials should be powered to detect a method that is more cost-effective than misoprostol solution and report outcomes included in this NMA., Study Registration: This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42013005116., Funding: The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.