Search

Modifying the central core is a very efficient strategy to boost the performance of non-fullerene acceptors.

All tissues contain an extracellular matrix (ECM) which is constantly and dynamically remodeled, either in physiological or pathological processes, such as fibrosis or cancer. One of the key contributors in the establishment of a fibrotic state is the abnormal deposition of extracellular matrix and cross-linked proteins, in particular collagen, leading to tissue stiffening and disruption of organ function. The precise and sensitive measurement of these cross-links by LC-MS/MS is a very powerful tool for providing a quantitative and qualitative analysis of fibrosis and is a key requirement in the study of this state, as well as in the development of drugs for this unmet clinical need.

All tissues contain an extracellular matrix (ECM) which is constantly and dynamically remodeled, either in physiological or pathological processes, such as fibrosis or cancer. One of the key contributors in the establishment of a fibrotic state is the abnormal deposition of extracellular matrix and cross-linked proteins, in particular collagen, leading to tissue stiffening and disruption of organ function. The precise and sensitive measurement of these cross-links by LC-MS/MS is a very powerful tool for providing a quantitative and qualitative analysis of fibrosis and is a key requirement in the study of this state, as well as in the development of drugs for this unmet clinical need.

Fibrosis is characterized by the excessive deposition of extracellular matrix and crosslinked proteins, in particular collagen and elastin, leading to tissue stiffening and disrupted organ function. Lysyl oxidases are key players during this process, as they initiate collagen crosslinking through the oxidation of the ε‐amino group of lysine or hydroxylysine on collagen side‐chains, which subsequently dimerize to form immature, or trimerize to form mature, collagen crosslinks. The role of LOXL2 in fibrosis and cancer is well documented, however the specific enzymatic function of LOXL2 and LOXL3 during disease is less clear. Herein, we describe the development of PXS‐5153A, a novel mechanism based, fast‐acting, dual LOXL2/LOXL3 inhibitor, which was used to interrogate the role of these enzymes in models of collagen crosslinking and fibrosis. PXS‐5153A dose‐dependently reduced LOXL2‐mediated collagen oxidation and collagen crosslinking in vitro. In two liver fibrosis models, carbon tetrachloride or streptozotocin/high fat diet‐induced, PXS‐5153A reduced disease severity and improved liver function by diminishing collagen content and collagen crosslinks. In myocardial infarction, PXS‐5153A improved cardiac output. Taken together these results demonstrate that, due to their crucial role in collagen crosslinking, inhibition of the enzymatic activities of LOXL2/LOXL3 represents an innovative therapeutic approach for the treatment of fibrosis.

Tumor necrosis-factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) has been implicated in angiogenesis; the growth of new blood vessels from an existing vessel bed. Our aim was to compare pro-angiogenic responses of TRAIL, vascular endothelial growth-factor-A (VEGF-A) and fibroblast growth-factor-2 (FGF-2) either separately (10 ng/mL) or in combination, followed by the assessment of proliferation, migration and tubule formation using human microvascular endothelial-1 (HMEC-1) cells in vitro. Angiogenesis was also measured in vivo using the Matrigel plug assay. TRAIL and FGF-2 significantly augmented HMEC-1 cell proliferation and migration, with combination treatment having an enhanced effect on cell migration only. In contrast, VEGF-A did not stimulate HMEC-1 migration at 10 ng/mL. Tubule formation was induced by all three factors, with TRAIL more effective compared to VEGF-A, but not FGF-2. TRAIL at 400 ng/mL, but not VEGF-A, promoted CD31-positive staining into the Matrigel plug. However, FGF-2 was superior, stimulating cell infiltration and angiogenesis better than TRAIL and VEGF-A in vivo. These findings demonstrate that each growth factor is more effective at different processes of angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. Understanding how these molecules stimulate different processes relating to angiogenesis may help identify new strategies and treatments aimed at inhibiting or promoting dysregulated angiogenesis in people.