Search

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are the most common gastrointestinal tract mesenchymal tumours. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have transformed the management of advanced GIST. Imatinib was the first TKI to gain approval as management for patients with advanced GIST, establishing a new standard of care. Since then, as a result of several trials including the GRID and INVICTUS studies, we now have five lines of approved targeted therapy, including imatinib, sunitinib, regorafenib, ripretinib and avapritinib for the treatment of unresectable, advanced GISTs. In this review, the Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group (AGITG) provide an overview of the key trials that have changed clinical practice, discuss the molecular drivers of GISTs, the importance of molecular testing and directing therapy according to molecular targets, as well as future strategies in the management of advanced GISTs.

The risk of recurrence after completion of curative-intent treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) is hard to predict. Post-treatment assaying for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is an encouraging approach for stratifying patients for therapy, but the prognostic value of this approach is less explored. This study aimed to determine if detection of methylated BCAT1 and IKZF1 following completion of initial treatment identified patients with a poorer recurrence-free survival (RFS).142 CRC stage I-III cases with at least 2 years of follow up (unless recurrence was evident sooner) and a methylated BCAT1/IKZF1 test result between 2 weeks and 12 months after completion of initial treatment were eligible for study inclusion. The association between BCAT1/IKZF1 and RFS was assessed by the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) method. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used for multivariable survival analysis.Thirty-three (23.2%) had recurrence at a median 1.6y (interquartile range: 0.8-2.4). Methylated BCAT1/IKZF1 was detected in 19 of the 142 patients (13.4%) and was associated with a significant risk of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 5.7, 95%CI: 1.9-17.3, p = 0.002). Three-year RFS for patients with or without detectable methylated BCAT1/IKZF1 was 56.5% and 83.3%, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that detection of methylated BCAT1/IKZF1 (HR = 2.6, p = 0.049) and site of the primary tumor (HR = 4.2, p = 0.002) were the only significant prognostic indicators of poor RFS.BCAT1/IKZF1 methylation testing after curative-intent treatment is an independent prognostic indicator for RFS and identifies a subgroup at high risk. Personalized surveillance is warranted for patients with these ctDNA biomarkers detectable after curative-intent treatment.

Background: SHR-A1811 is an ADC comprised of a humanized anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody (trastuzumab), a cleavable linker, and a DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor payload. Here we assessed SHR-A1811 in HER2-expressing/mutated unresectable, advanced, or metastatic solid tumors. Methods: Pts were eligible if they had HER2 positive breast cancer (BC), HER2 positive gastric/GEJ carcinoma, HER2 low-expressing BC, HER2-expressing/mutated NSCLC, or other HER2-expressing/mutated solid tumors, and were refractory or intolerant to standard therapy. SHR-A1811 at doses of 1.0-8.0 mg/kg was given Q3W (IV). The primary endpoints were DLT, safety, and the RP2D. Results: From Sep 7, 2020 to Sep 28, 2022, 250 pts who had undergone a median of 3 prior treatment lines in the metastatic setting received at least one dose of SHR-A1811 in dose escalation, PK expansion, and indication expansion part. As of data cutoff on Sep 28, 2022, 1 pt experienced DLT. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 243 (97.2%) pts. Grade ≥3 TRAEs, serious TRAEs, and treatment-related deaths were reported in 131 (52.4%), 31 (12.4%), and 3 (1.2%) pts, respectively. Interstitial lung disease (AESI) was reported in 8 (3.2%) pts. Exposures of SHR-A1811, total antibody, and the payload were generally proportional to dose from 3.2 to 8.0 mg/kg. ORR was 61.6% (154/250, 95% CI 55.3-67.7) in all pts. Objective responses were observed in pts with HER2 positive BC (88/108, ORR 81.5%, 95% CI 72.9-88.3), HER2-low BC (43/77, ORR 55.8%, 95% CI 44.1-67.2), urothelial carcinoma (7/11), colorectal cancer (3/10), gastric/GEJ carcinoma (5/9), biliary tract cancer (5/8), NSCLC (1/3), endometrial cancer (1/2), and H&N cancer (1/1). Subgroup analyses of ORR are shown in Table 1. The 6-month PFS rate was 73.9% in all pts. Conclusions: SHR-A1811 was well-tolerated and showed promising antitumor activity in heavily pretreated advanced solid tumors. Table 1. Subgroup analyses of ORR No. of prior treatment lines in metastatic setting in all pts (N=250) HER2 positive BC (N=108) HER2-low BC (N=77) Other tumor types (N=65) ≤3 81.8% (45/55) 58.7% (27/46) 36.7% (18/49) >3 81.1% (43/53) 51.6% (16/31) 31.3% (5/16) Prior anti-HER2 therapies in pts with BC (N=185)* HER2 positive BC (N=108) HER2-low BC (N=77) All BC (N=185) Any 82.2% (88/107, 73.7-89.0) 68.8% (11/16, 41.3-89.0) 80.5% (99/123, 72.4-87.1) Trastuzumab 81.9% (86/105, 73.2-88.7) 75.0% (9/12, 42.8-94.5) 81.2% (95/117, 72.9-87.8) Pertuzumab 83.0% (39/47, 69.2-92.4) 100% (5/5, 47.8-100) 84.6% (44/52, 71.9-93.1) Pyrotinib 86.9% (53/61, 75.8-94.1) 71.4% (5/7, 29.0-96.3) 85.3% (58/68, 74.6-92.7) Lapatinib 80.0% (28/35, 63.1-91.6) 100% (1/1, 2.5-100) 80.6% (29/36, 64.0-91.8) T-DM1 82.4% (14/17, 56.6-96.2) 100% (3/3, 29.2-100) 85.0% (17/20, 62.1-96.8) Other HER2-ADC (except T-DM1)** 60.0% (9/15, 32.3-83.7) 50.0% (2/4, 6.8-93.2) 57.9% (11/19, 33.5-79.8) ORR in pts with tumor types other than BC (N=65) HER2 IHC3+ or IHC2+/ISH+ (N=36) HER2 IHC2+/ISH- or IHC1+ or unknown (N=29) All other tumor types (N=65) % (n/N) 38.9% (14/36) 31.0% (9/29) 35.4% (23/65) ORR was shown as % (n/N, 95% CI) or % (n/N). *ORR is calculated using the number of subjects previously treated with anti-HER2 cancer therapy in advanced/metastatic setting as denominator; 2-sided 95% CIs are estimated using Clopper-Pearson method. **Includes RC48-ADC, A166, DP303c, MRG002, ARX788, TAA013, DX126-262, PF-06804103, and BAT8001. Citation Format: Herui Yao, Min Yan, Zhongsheng Tong, Xinhong Wu, Min-Hee Ryu, Jee Hyun Kim, John Park, Yahua Zhong, Weiqing Han, Caigang Liu, Mark Voskoboynik, Qun Qin, Jian Zhang, Minal Barve, Ana Acuna-Villaorduna, Vinod Ganju, Seock-Ah Im, Changsheng Ye, Yongmei Yin, Amitesh C. Roy, Li-Yuan Bai, Yung-Chang Lin, Chia-Jui Yen, Hui Li, Ki Young Chung, Shanzhi Gu, Jun Qian, Yuee Teng, Yiding Chen, Yu Shen, Kaijing Zhao, Shangyi Rong, Xiaoyu Zhu, Erwei Song. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of SHR-A1811 in HER2-expressing/mutated advanced solid tumors: A global phase 1, multi-center, first-in-human study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT175.

This study aims to investigate disparities in demographics, disease characteristics, treatment and overall survival between South Australian (SA) Indigenous and non-Indigenous patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).This employs a retrospective population study using the SA mCRC registry.The SA mCRC registry identifies mCRC patients from hospital encounters, histopathology reports, medical oncology letters, clinician notification, attendances at multidisciplinary meetings and death audits by the SA Cancer Registry.A total of 2865 adult mCRC patients including 14 Indigenous patients were identified through the SA mCRC registry between February 2006 and August 2013. Patients were linked to the SA Cancer Registry to obtain Indigenous status.Demographic, disease and treatment characteristics were compared using Chi-squared test and t-test; while overall survival defined as time to any cause of death was analysed using Cox regression.No difference was observed for clinical characteristics, except for a higher proportion of Indigenous patients receiving chemotherapy (85.7% versus 58.5%; P = 0.04). The rate of liver surgery was similar across the two groups (21.0% versus 15.1%; P = 0.40). The median overall survivals were equivalent (11.9 months versus 15.1 months; hazard ratio = 1.00; 95% confidence interval for hazard ratio, 0.54-1.86).Clinical characteristics and survival outcomes were similar between Indigenous and non-Indigenous patients captured on the SA mCRC registry, and outcome of those who have an access to comprehensive cancer care appeared independent of Indigenous status and in line with large clinical trials. Underestimation of Indigenous cases due to their lower utilisation of cancer service could not be excluded and ultimately the accurate reporting of these patients is crucial.