1. Pegfilgrastim: More Cost Effective and Equally Efficacious Option as Compared to Filgrastim in Autologous Stem Cell Transplant
- Author
-
Vipul Sheth, Tapan Saikia, Adwaita Gore, R. Jain, and Amit Ghanekar
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Chemotherapy ,Hematology ,business.industry ,medicine.medical_treatment ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Neutropenia ,Filgrastim ,medicine.disease ,Gastroenterology ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Autologous stem-cell transplantation ,Internal medicine ,PEG ratio ,medicine ,Original Article ,business ,Febrile neutropenia ,Pegfilgrastim ,030215 immunology ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Use of growth factor after high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) support is current standard in reducing days of neutropenia. This retrospective study aims to compare the efficacy of two standard growth factors, pegfilgrastim (PEG) and filgrastim (FIL) after HDC. We collected data on 195 consecutive adult patients who received an autotransplant (myeloma, lymphoma and others) between January 2004 and December 2014 at two tertiary care centres. The primary end point was the duration of neutropenia in terms of days to reach an ANC > 0.5 × 10(9)/L. Filgrastim was given to 110 patients and PEG was given to 85 patients. Time to engraftment, defined as the time to reach an ANC of 0.5 × 10(9)/L on 2 consecutive days after the day of auto-SCT, was 12.6 days with FIL compared with 12.1 days with PEG group (p = 0.126). When comparing the total days of severe neutropenia (WBC
- Published
- 2018