Search

The FDA's directive to deal with delayed confirmatory trials: lessons from pralatrexate and belinostat for T-cell lymphoma.

The nonrandomized phase II study by Ding et al. explored the combination of azacitidine and chidamide with or without GemOx chemotherapy in relapsed/refractory peripheral T cell lymphoma and demonstrated that the dual epigenetic therapy is safe and efficacious, particularly in the angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma subset. 1 Further investigation into adding chemotherapy is warranted, building on the promising results seen in this trial., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests Y.W. declares research funding (to institution) from Incyte, InnoCare, LOXO Oncology, Eli Lilly, MorphoSys, Novartis, Genentech, Genmab, AbbVie, BeiGene, and Merck; advisory board membership (compensation to institution) for Eli Lilly, LOXO Oncology, TG Therapeutics, Incyte, InnoCare, Kite, Jansen, BeiGene, AstraZeneca, Genmab, and AbbVie; consultancy fees (compensation to institution) from InnoCare, AbbVie; and honorarium (to institution) from Kite., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Peripheral T cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are prototypical epigenetic malignancies with invariably poor prognoses. Novel and effective therapeutic strategies are needed to improve clinical outcomes, particularly in relapsed/refractory patients., Methods: We conducted a multicenter phase 2 study to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of azacitidine and chidamide, alone or in combination with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GemOx), in patients with relapsed/refractory PTCLs (registration number: ChiCTR2000037232). The primary endpoint was the best overall response rate., Findings: As of May 1st, 2024, thirty patients were evaluable for efficacy and toxicity. The best overall response rate was 53.3%, meeting its primary endpoint. Among the patients with angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma (AITL; N = 19), a numerically higher response rate was observed, regardless of whether chemotherapy was combined, compared to patients with non-AITL. After a median follow-up of 36.6 months, median progression-free survival and overall survival were 7.1 and 8.7 months, respectively. Patients with AITL who received combination chemotherapy (N = 12) achieved the most promising response rates (overall response rate, 91.7%; complete remission rate, 66.7%) and survival outcomes (median progression-free survival, 17.2 months; median overall survival, 38.8 months). The most common grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (40.0%) and thrombocytopenia (30.0%)., Conclusions: The combination of epigenetic therapy with GemOx was well tolerated and highly effective in patients with relapsed/refractory PTCLs. Patients with AITL, in particular, may benefit more from this combination treatment and should be the focus of future studies., Funding: This work was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20232039)., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Recent advancements in comprehending peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) validate and broaden our perspective, highlighting their diverse nature and the varying molecular mechanisms underlying the entities. Based on a comprehensive accumulated understanding, the PTCLs currently overcome the most challenging features of any disease: rarity, incredible heterogeneity, and a lack of any established standard of care. The treatments deployed in the front-line are extrapolated from regimens developed for other diseases. The recent approval of the three drugs brentuximab vedotin (BV), pralatrexate, and belinostat for patients with relapsed or refractory disease has provided clues about pathophysiology and future directions, though challenges satisfying post-marketing requirements (PMR) for those accelerated approvals have led to one of those drugs being withdrawn and put the other two in jeopardy. Edits of the front-line regimens, often called CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone)-plus approaches, look more like CHOP-minus strategies, as the toxicity of five-drug regimens often reduces the dose intensity of the added 'novel' drug, nullifying any hope of an advance. The turmoil in the field produced by the aforementioned, coupled with an ever-changing classification, has left the field uncertain about the path forward. Despite these challenges, empiric findings from studies of novel drug approaches, coupled with a logic emerging from studies of PTCL lymphomagenesis, have begun to illuminate, albeit faintly for some, a potential direction. The empiric finding that drugs targeting the discrete components of the PTCL epigenome, coupled with the description of multiple mutations in genes that govern epigenetic biology, offers, at the very least, an opportunity to finally be hypothesis-driven. The most recent recognition that the only combination of drugs shown to markedly improve progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with relapsed disease is one based on dual targeting of different and discrete components of that epigenetic biology has established a possibility that circumnavigating chemotherapy addition studies is both plausible, feasible, and likely the best prospect for a quantum advance in this disease. Herein, we analyze PTCL through a 2025 lens, highlighting and underscoring walls that have impeded progress. We will critically explore all the clues and the panoramic view of PTCL research., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Abstract: Patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) mature natural killer cell and T-cell lymphoma have limited treatment options. To evaluate pralatrexate's performance and factors influencing its safety and efficacy in R/R peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), we performed a pooled analysis of data from 4 similarly designed, regulatory-mandated prospective clinical trials. Of 221 patients (median age, 59 years; 67.0% male) in the study population, 48.9% had PTCL not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS), 21.3% angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, and 11.8% ALK-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL). Patients received pralatrexate for a median of 2.56 months (range, 0.03-24.18) and had a 40.7% objective response rate with a median duration of response of 9.1 months, progression-free survival 4.6 months, and overall survival 16.3 months. The most common treatment-related all-grade adverse events were stomatitis, thrombocytopenia, white blood cell count decrease, pyrexia, and vomiting. Subgroup exploratory analyses suggest improved efficacy with 1 prior line of chemotherapy vs 2 or ≥4 prior lines; PTCL-NOS or ALCL vs transformed mycosis fungoides; chemotherapy and transplant before pralatrexate vs chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy with other nontransplant treatments. In conclusion, these pooled analysis results further support using pralatrexate in patients with R/R PTCL. Prospective studies are needed to confirm the findings of subgroups analyses., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Previously, we conducted a Phase I study of the combination of pralatrexate and romidepsin in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) lymphomas and subsequently conducted a multicenter Phase II study in patients with untreated or R/R mature T cell lymphomas (MTCL). Patients received pralatrexate 25 mg/m 2 and romidepsin 12 mg/m 2 every 2 weeks. Fourteen patients were evaluable for efficacy. Overall response rate was 35.7% with CR in 14.3% and disease control in 50%. The mDOR was 8.2 months, mPFS was 3.6 months, and mOS was 20.2 months. Gastrointestinal side effects were most common in up to 33%; there was only one hematologic toxicity of grade 3 anemia. Combining results of MTCL patients from the Phase I and II studies ( N  = 28), the ORR was 53.5% with CR in 21.4%, disease control in67.8%, and DOR of 7.2 months. The combination was safe however does not out-perform other combination strategies. Trial Registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01947140).

Varicella zoster virus (VZV) is associated with herpes zoster (HZ) or herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO). All antiviral agents currently licensed for the management of VZV replication via modulating different mechanisms, and the resistance is on the rise. There is a need to develop new antiviral agents with distinct mechanisms of action and adequate safety profiles. Pralatrexate (PDX) is a fourth-generation anti-folate agent with an inhibitory activity on folate (FA) metabolism and has been used as an anti-tumor drug. We observed that PDX possessed potent inhibitory activity against VZV infection. In this study, we reported the antiviral effects and the underlying mechanism of PDX against VZV infection. The results showed that PDX not only inhibited VZV replication in vitro and in mice corneal tissues but also reduced the inflammatory response and apoptosis induced by viral infection. Furthermore, PDX treatment showed a similar anti-VSV inhibitory effect in both in vitro and in vivo models. Mechanistically, PDX inhibited viral replication by interrupting the substrate supply for de novo purine and thymidine synthesis. In conclusion, this study discovered the potent antiviral activity of PDX with a novel mechanism and presented a new strategy for VZV treatment that targets a cellular metabolic mechanism essential for viral replication. The present study provided a new insight into the development of broad-spectrum antiviral agents., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Folic acid was reported to significantly improve chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. In a similar mechanism of action, we investigated clinically approved antifolates by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as chondrogenic-promoting compounds for tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells. A poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(l-alanine) thermogelling system was used as a three-dimensional cell culture matrix, where stem cells and antifolates could be incorporated simultaneously during a heat-induced in situ sol-to-gel transition. The antifolates could be supplied over several days by the sustained release of the drug from the thermogel. Initially, seven antifolates were prescreened based on cell viability and expression of a typical chondrogenic biomarker of type II collagen (COL II) at the mRNA level. Then, dapsone, pralatrexate, and trimethoprim were selected as candidate compounds in the second round screening, and detailed studies were carried out on the mRNA and protein expression of various chondrogenic biomarkers including COL II, SRY box transcription factor 9, and aggrecan. Three-dimensional cultures of stem cells in the thermogel in the absence of a chondrogenic promoter compound and in the presence of kartogenin (KGN) were performed as a negative control and positive control, respectively. The chondrogenic biomarkers were significantly increased in the selected antifolate-incorporating systems compared to the negative control system, without an increase in type I collagen (an osteogenic biomarker) expression. Pralatrexate was the best compound for inducing chondrogenic differentiation of the stem cells, even better than the positive control (KGN). Nuclear translocation of the core-binding factor β subunit (CBFβ) and enhanced nuclear runt-related transcription factor 1 (RUNX1) by antifolate treatment suggested that the chondrogenesis-enhancing mechanism is mediated by CBFβ and RUNX1. An in silico modeling study confirmed the mechanism by proving the high binding affinity of pralatrexate to a target protein of filamin A compared with other antifolate candidates. To conclude, pralatrexate was rediscovered as a lead compound, and the polypeptide thermogel incorporating pralatrexate and mesenchymal stem cells can be a very effective system in promoting chondrogenic differentiation of stem cells and might be used in injectable tissue engineering for cartilage repair.

Heart diseases are known as the most primary causes of mortality worldwide. Although many therapeutic approaches and medications are proposed for these diseases, the identification of novel therapeutics in fatal heart conditions is promptly demanded. Besides, the interplay between gene expression data and molecular docking provides several novel insights to discover more effective and specific drugs for the treatment of the diseases. This study aimed to discover potent therapeutic drugs in the heart diseases based on the expression profile of heart-specific genes exclusively. Initially, the heart-specific and highly expressed genes were identified by comparing the gene expression profile of different body tissues. Subsequently, the druggable-genes were identified using in silico techniques. The interaction between these druggable genes with more than 1600 FDA approved drugs was then investigated using the molecular docking simulation. By comprehensively analyzing RNA-sequencing data obtained from 949 normal tissue samples, 48 heart-specific genes were identified in both the heart development and function. Notably, of these, 24 heart-specific genes were capable to be considered as druggable genes, among which only MYBPC3, MYLK3, and SCN5A genes entered the molecular docking process due to their functions. Afterward, the pharmacokinetics properties of top 10 ligands with the highest binding affinity for these proteins were studied. Accordingly, methylergonovine, fosaprepitant, pralatrexate, daunorubicin, glecaprevir, digoxin, and venetoclax drugs were competent, in order to interact with the target proteins perfectly. It was shown that these medications can be used as specific drugs for the treatment of heart diseases after fulfilling further experiments in this regard., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests.Zahra Bazi reports financial support was provided by Golestan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services. Zahra Bazi reports financial support was provided by Golestan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We report the case of a 59-year-old woman with stage IV erythrodermic mycosis fungoides (MF) and large cell transformation who, despite failing multiple previous treatments, achieved complete remission through a combination of pralatrexate and romidepsin followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). Further studies are needed in focussing on this combined regimen in treating cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) and its efficacy as a bridging regimen in facilitating successful alloSCT., (© 2021 The Australasian College of Dermatologists.)

Background: Pralatrexate (PDX) is a novel antifolate approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma, but some patients exhibit intrinsic resistance or develop acquired resistance. Here, we evaluated the mechanisms underlying acquired resistance to PDX and explored potential therapeutic strategies to overcome PDX resistance., Methods: To investigate PDX resistance, we established two PDX-resistant T-lymphoblastic leukemia cell lines (CEM and MOLT4) through continuous exposure to increasing doses of PDX. The resistance mechanisms were evaluated by measuring PDX uptake, apoptosis induction and folate metabolism-related protein expression. We also applied gene expression analysis and methylation profiling to identify the mechanisms of resistance. We then explored rational drug combinations using a spheroid (3D)-culture assay., Results: Compared with their parental cells, PDX-resistant cells exhibited a 30-fold increase in half-maximal inhibitory concentration values. Induction of apoptosis by PDX was significantly decreased in both PDX-resistant cell lines. Intracellular uptake of [ 14 C]-PDX decreased in PDX-resistant CEM cells but not in PDX-resistant MOLT4 cells. There was no significant change in expression of dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) or folylpolyglutamate synthetase (FPGS). Gene expression array analysis revealed that DNA-methyltransferase 3β (DNMT3B) expression was significantly elevated in both cell lines. Gene set enrichment analysis revealed that adipogenesis and mTORC1 signaling pathways were commonly upregulated in both resistant cell lines. Moreover, CpG island hypermethylation was observed in both PDX resistant cells lines. In the 3D-culture assay, decitabine (DAC) plus PDX showed synergistic effects in PDX-resistant cell lines compared with parental lines., Conclusions: The resistance mechanisms of PDX were associated with reduced cellular uptake of PDX and/or overexpression of DNMT3B. Epigenetic alterations were also considered to play a role in the resistance mechanism. The combination of DAC and PDX exhibited synergistic activity, and thus, this approach might improve the clinical efficacy of PDX., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Pralatrexate is a new generation antifolate treatment agent used for the treatment of relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphomas. This study aims to determine the general characteristics of the patients receiving pralatrexate therapy in Turkey, contributing to the literature on the effectiveness of pralatrexate therapy in peripheral T-cell lymphomas by determining the response levels of such patients to the therapy. The study also attempts to clinically examine the major side effects observed in patients during treatment with pralatrexate., Methods: The study included patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma followed up in the hematology units of several hospitals in Turkey. Overall, 20 patients aged 18 and over were included in the study., Results: The median age at the time of diagnosis was 58.5 years. PTCL-NOS (Peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified) subtype was in 40% of patients, making the PTCL-NOS the most common subtype in the study. In general, most patients were diagnosed with disease at an advanced stage. Pralatrexate therapy was given to the patients at a median treatment line of 3.5. Pralatrexate dose reduction was required in only 3 patients (15%). Response to pralatrexate therapy with partial remission (PR) and above was observed in 11 (55%) of the patients., Conclusion: Pralatrexate seemed to be a promising novel treatment in relapsed refractory PTCL patients. However, patients receiving pralatrexate should be followed up carefully for skin reactions, mucosal side effects, thrombocytopenia and neutropenia.

In this study, a series of green, interference-free fluorimetric detection methods of the excitation-emission matrix coupled with the second-order calibration methods were proposed for the determination of ibrutinib and pralatrexate in various complicated biological fluids. The second-order advantage of the proposed method can overcome the problem of poor selectivity caused by the wide spectra of the fluorescence method. Even in the presence of uncalibrated interferences and severe peak overlap, the signal of pure substance and accurate quantitative results were still obtained. The average recoveries of the three methods were 94.5-104.9% for Alternating Trilinear Decomposition (ATLD) algorithm, 95.5-105.8% for Alternating Normalization Weighted Error (ANWE) algorithm and 94.4-105.7% for Parallel Factor Analysis (PARAFAC) algorithm, respectively. For ATLD, ANWE and PARAFAC, the relative standard deviations (RSD) were lower than 9.2%, 6.8% and 9.2%, and the RMSEPs were less than 8.1, 8.4 and 8.6 ng mL -1 , respectively. In addition, the elliptic joint confidence region (EJCR) was adopted to further prove the accuracy of the three methods. The results showed that the three methods can accurately be quantified without significant difference. Good figures of merit parameters were also obtained. Among them, the limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) of ibrutinib and pralatrexate were in the range of 0.11-0.76 ng mL -1 and 0.21-1.12 ng mL -1 , respectively, which were lower than the corresponding blood concentrations. These results indicate that the proposed method provides a promising, alternative and universal analysis strategy for clinical drug monitoring., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Pralatrexate has been approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory peripheral T cell lymphomas. Studies in the U.S. also support the clinical efficacy of pralatrexate to treat advanced-stage cutaneous T-cell lymphomas, but outcomes in Japanese patients have not yet been reported. We herein describe two Japanese patients with heavily-pretreated relapsed/refractory mycosis fungoides that were successfully controlled by pralatrexate., (© 2021 The Authors. The Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Dermatological Association.)

We present a retrospective multicenter study of pralatrexate treatment outcomes in an Australian practice setting for patients with relapsed/refractory T-cell lymphoma who had failed 1+ systemic therapies, treated via a compassionate access program. Endpoints assessed included response rates, toxicities, and subsequent therapies. Progression-free survival (PFS), time to next treatment (TTNT), event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and time to best response, were assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. The study included 31 patients, with median age 69 years. We demonstrated ORR of 35.5% ( n  = 11), including 4 complete responses (13%) and 7 partial responses (23%). The predicted median OS was 10 months, with EFS of 9 months, and PFS of 9 months. Median TTNT was 8 months. Mucositis was the most commonly observed toxicity. This study - the second largest real-world cohort reported to date - underscores the importance of pralatrexate in relapsed/refractory T-cell lymphoma, as well as its acceptable toxicity profile.

The spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus poses serious threats to the global public health and leads to worldwide crisis. No effective drug or vaccine is readily available. The viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) is a promising therapeutic target. A hybrid drug screening procedure was proposed and applied to identify potential drug candidates targeting RdRp from 1906 approved drugs. Among the four selected market available drug candidates, Pralatrexate and Azithromycin were confirmed to effectively inhibit SARS-CoV-2 replication in vitro with EC50 values of 0.008μM and 9.453 μM, respectively. For the first time, our study discovered that Pralatrexate is able to potently inhibit SARS-CoV-2 replication with a stronger inhibitory activity than Remdesivir within the same experimental conditions. The paper demonstrates the feasibility of fast and accurate anti-viral drug screening for inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 and provides potential therapeutic agents against COVID-19., Competing Interests: NO authors have competing interests

Background: Patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma (R/R PTCL) treated with pralatrexate have previously shown superior overall survival (OS) compared to those who underwent conventional chemotherapy (CC, 15.4 vs. 4.07 months). We conducted an economic evaluation of pralatrexate from a societal perspective in Korea based on data from the PROPEL phase II study., Methods: Using a Markov model with a weekly cycle, we simulated the experience of patients with R/R PTCL receiving pralatrexate or CC for 15 years. The model consists of five health states; initial treatment, treatment pause, subsequent treatment, stem cell transplantation (SCT) success, and death. Comparative effectiveness was based on PROPEL phase II single-arm study and its matched historical control analysis. Costs included drug, drug administration, monitoring, adverse event management, and SCT costs., Results: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the base case was $39,153 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. The results of one-way sensitivity analysis ranged from $33,949 to $51,846 per QALY gained, which remained within an implicit willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of anticancer drugs in Korea., Conclusions: Pralatrexate is a cost-effective intervention with improved OS and incremental costs within the WTP limit. Pralatrexate could function as a new therapeutic option for patients suffering from life-threatening R/R PTCL.

While pralatrexate (PDX) has been successfully developed for the treatment of T-cell lymphoma, the mechanistic basis for its T-cell selectivity and acquired resistance remains elusive. In an effort to potentially identify synergistic combinations that might circumnavigate or delay acquired PDX resistance, we generated resistant cells lines over a broad concentration range. PDX-resistant cell lines H9-12 and H9-200 were developed, each exhibiting an IC50 of 35 and over 1000 nM, respectively. These lines were established in vitro from parental H9 cells. Expression analysis of the proteins known to be important determinants of antifolate pharmacology revealed increase expression of dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) due to gene amplification, and reduced folate carrier1 downregulation, as the putative mechanisms of resistance in H9-12 and H9-200 cells. Cross resistance was only seen with methotrexate but not with romidepsin, azacitidine (AZA), decitabine, gemcitabine, doxorubicin, or bortezomib. Resistance to PDX was reversed by pretreatment with hypomethylating agents in a concentration-dependent fashion. Comparison of gene expression profiles of parental and resistant cell lines confirmed markedly different patterns of gene expression, and identified the dual specificity phosphatase four (DUSP4) as one of the molecular target of PDX activity. Reduced STAT5 phosphorylation following exposure to PDX was observed in the H9 but not in the H9-12 and H9-200 cells. These data suggest that combination with hypomethylating agents could be potent, and that DUSP4 and STAT5 could represent putative biomarkers of PDX activity., (© 2020 The Authors. Genes, Chromosomes & Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) is a histological subtype of peripheral T-cell lymphoma associated with a poor prognosis. This post-hoc pooled analysis aims to provide insight about the efficacy of pralatrexate monotherapy in a subset of twenty-nine patients with relapsed or refractory (r/r) AITL drawn from two prospective registration trials completed in China and Japan. After a median of two prior lines of therapy, an overall response rate of 52% (15/29 patients; 95% CI 0.34, 0.70) was demonstrated. The estimated median duration of response, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6.4 months (196 days), 5.0 months (151 days), and 18.0 months (548 days), respectively. Grades 1-3 mucositis was observed in twenty-three patients (79.3%); and hemato-toxicity in twenty-six (89.7%) patients. Results of this analysis corroborate with data from two previously reported US retrospective cohorts, supporting the potential benefits of pralatrexate monotherapy in patients with r/r AITL.

Introduction: Peripheral T cell lymphomas (PTCL) are a heterogenous group of lymphoproliferative disorders which are generally not curable with conventional chemotherapy and associated with inferior outcomes. Pralatrexate is a novel folate analog, the first FDA approved drug) for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) PTCL., Areas Covered: This paper provides a comprehensive review of PubMed literature describing the use of pralatrexate in R/R peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Pharmacokinetics and mechanism of action of pralatrexate are discussed as well as its clinical efficacy and safety in comparison to other agents available in R/R PTCL., Expert Opinion: Pralatrexate is an active agent in relapsed/refractory PTCL with lower response rates seen in patients with angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphomas. Mucositis is the most frequently observed adverse event and this can be mitigated by the use of leucovorin along with cyanocobalamin and folic acid.

Background: Extranodal natural killer/T cell lymphoma, nasal type, is one of the more common subtypes of mature T cell lymphoma, especially in the Far East Asian population. This aggressive histologic subtype of peripheral T cell lymphomas is frequently susceptible to exposure of Epstein-Barr virus infection. The optimal treatment is not well elucidated. For stage IV disseminated extranodal natural killer/T cell lymphoma, induction chemotherapy with consolidative autologus or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is recommended as the major first-line treatment. However, there is controversy over which type of chemotherapy is most appropriate and effective as a bridge to autologus or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed disseminated advanced-stage or relapsed extranodal natural killer/T cell lymphoma because of cancer chemoresistance or associated complications. Pralatrexate is the first US Food and Drug Administration-approved novel agent for the treatment of refractory/recurrent peripheral T cell lymphomas. In our case, pralatrexate was used as a successful bridge to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in a patient with advanced-stage disseminated extranodal natural killer/T cell lymphoma refractory to first-line chemotherapy., Case Presentation: We presented a case report of a 29-year-old Asian man diagnosed as having stage IV disseminated extranodal natural killer/T cell lymphoma, nasal type, with skin and bone marrow involvement, whose disease was primary refractory to first-line dexamethasone, methotrexate, ifosfamide, L-asparaginase, and etoposide chemotherapy, but obviously responded to treatment with two cycles of single-agent pralatrexate treatment. Monitoring Epstein-Barr virus viremia revealed dramatic downregulation. In addition to complete remission of the involvement of bone marrow and nasal cavity, skin involvement also obtained partial remission. The extranodal natural killer/T cell lymphoma successfully achieved complete remission after a bridge to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation., Conclusions: This is the first study to present pralatrexate as a successful bridge to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in a 29-year-old Asian male patient with advanced-stage extranodal natural killer/T cell lymphoma refractory to first-line dexamethasone, methotrexate, ifosfamide, L-asparaginase, and etoposide chemotherapy. This case provides a novel treatment opinion for extranodal natural killer/T cell lymphoma, especially for the Far East Asian population.

Pralatrexate(PDX)has been approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma(PTCL), including angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma(AITL). Oral mucositis is the most common and severe adverse effect of PDX that often leads to dose reduction or omission. Herein, we report a 65-year-old man with AITL, who received PDX treatment after a second relapse. This drug was effective; however, the adverse effects, such as oral mucositis, were severe. Therefore, leucovorin(LV)was administered to prevent the adverse effect, resulting in continuation of the PDX treatment for 8 months. LV administration minimizes adverse effects for patients receiving high-dose methotrexate. However, the optimal dose and schedule of LV in PDX treatment has not yet been established. In the future, clinical trials on the use of LV for PDX-induced oral mucositis are needed.

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of a combination of pralatrexate plus oxaliplatin in advanced esophagogastric cancer (EGC), analyze the impact of polymorphisms in folate metabolism pathway genes on toxicity and efficacy of pralatrexate, and to evaluate microRNA profile of tumor epithelium as a predictive biomarker. This was a two-stage trial with a safety lead in cohort and a primary endpoint of overall response rate (ORR). Patients received biweekly intravenous oxaliplatin (85 mg/m 2 ) and pralatrexate (Dose level 1 [D1], 120 mg/m 2 ; dose level-1 [D-1] 100 mg/m 2 ). Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in genes encoding proteins involved in pralatrexate metabolism were evaluated in germline DNA. microRNA profiling of the tumor epithelium was performed. ORR was 26%. Dose-limiting toxicities were observed in 2 of 4 patients at D1 and none at D-1. The T>C polymorphism in DHFR rs11951910 was significantly associated with lower progression-free survival (PFS; P ≤ 0.01), whereas the presence of the SLC19A1 rs2838957 G>A polymorphism was associated with improved PFS ( P = 0.02). Presence of the GGH rs3780130 A>T and SLC19A1 rs1051266 G>A polymorphisms were significantly associated with better overall survival (OS; P = 0.01), whereas GGH rs7010484 T>C polymorphism was associated significantly with reduced OS ( P = 0.04). There was no correlation between epithelial microRNA expression profile with disease progression or response. We conclude that the combination of oxaliplatin and pralatrexate is safe, is well tolerated, and has modest efficacy in advanced EGC. Pharmacogenomic analysis may be relevant to the use of pralatrexate in combination with platinum agents., (©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) are a heterogeneous group of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas with poor clinical outcomes. Pralatrexate showed efficacy and safety in recurrent or refractory PTCLs. The purpose or this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of pralatrexate in relapsed or refractory PTCLs in real-world practice. This was an observational, multicenter, retrospective analysis. Between December 2012 and December 2016, a total of 38 patients with relapsed or refractory PTCLs were treated with pralatrexate at 10 tertiary hospitals in Korea. Patients received an intravenous infusion of pralatrexate at a dose of 30 mg/m 2 /week for 6 weeks on a 7-week schedule. Modified dosing and/or scheduling was allowed according to institutional protocols. Median patient age was 58 years (range, 29-80 years) and the most common subtype was peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (n = 23, 60.5%). The median dosage of pralatrexate per administration was 25.6 mg/m 2 /wk (range, 15.0-33.0 mg/m 2 /wk). In intention-to-treat analysis, 3 patients (7.9%) showed a complete response and 5 patients (13.2%) showed a partial response, resulting in an overall response rate (ORR) of 21.1%. The median duration of response was 7.6 months (range, 1.6-24.3 months). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-1.8 months) and the median overall survival was 7.7 months (95% CI, 4.4-9.0 months). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (n = 13, 34.2%), neutropenia (n = 7, 23.7%), and anemia (n = 7, 18.4%). Our study showed relatively lower ORR and shorter PFS in patients with recurrent or refractory PTCLs treated with pralatrexate in real-world practice. The toxicity profile was acceptable and manageable. We also observed significantly lower dose intensity of pralatrexate in real-world practice.

Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) are rare, heterogeneous non-Hodgkin lymphomas with poor prognoses. Pralatrexate has demonstrated efficacy in T-cell lymphomas; however, mucositis has been reported as the most common dose-modifying adverse event. Leucovorin has been shown to minimize mucositis incidence, without sacrificing pralatrexate efficacy. We retrospectively studied 34 patients (7-PTCL/27-CTCL) treated with pralatrexate alone or pralatrexate and leucovorin. Leucovorin was administered preemptively prior to any mucositis occurrence. Pralatrexate dosing ranged from 10-30 mg/m 2 and clinical response or disease stabilization was observed in 85.2%. The incidence of mucositis was reduced in CTCL patients to 17% and was ameliorated in all but one patient with PTCL. There was no change the incidence of skin reactions with the addition of leucovorin. The response rates were similar to those previously reported in CTCL and PTCL. The addition of leucovorin reduced the incidence of mucositis in patients with CTCL and PTCL.

Rationale: Relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphomas are aggressive diseases. Pralatrexate is an antimetabolite. Hereby, we are reporting a pralatrexate induced durable response in a relapsed/refractory peripheral T-Cell lymphoma patient with a history of autologous stem cell transplantation., Patient Concerns: A male patient born in February 1947 was diagnosed with lymphoma based on his cervical lymph node excisional biopsy., Diagnoses: He was diagnosed with PTCL-NOS on February 19, 2013., Interventions: The patient received 6 cycles of CHOP (Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicine, vincristine, methylprednisolone) chemotherapy, which achieved a complete remission. The patient underwent autologous stem cell transplantation in December 2013. After relapse was detected in the third month of the transplantation, the patient was treated with 2 cycles of ViGePP (vinorelbine, gemcitabine, procarbazine, prednisone/ methylprednisolone) chemotherapy. The patient was considered refractory to treatment after the ViGePP chemotherapy, and he was given brentuximab vedotin. Once a full response to treatment was achieved after 2 cycles, the patient received 6 cycles of brentuximab vedotin treatment. After 6 cycles, a skin biopsy was performed and the patient was diagnosed with relapsed/refractory PTCL-NOS. Pralatrexate therapy was then started on February 1, 2016 at a dose of 30 mg/m once weekly for 6 weeks in 7-week cycles., Outcomes: The patient responded to pralatrexate treatment. And he has been under pralatrexate treatment over 3 years., Lessons: Pralatrexate should also be kept in mind as a treatment alternative in relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma patients.

Mogamulizumab, a humanized defucosylated anti-C-C chemokine receptor 4 monoclonal antibody, has been approved in Japan for the treatment of C-C chemokine receptor 4-positive adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL). This phase II study evaluated efficacy and safety of mogamulizumab in ATL patients with acute, lymphoma, and chronic subtypes with relapsed/refractory, aggressive disease in the US, Europe, and Latin America. With stratification by subtype, patients were randomized 2:1 to intravenous mogamulizumab 1.0 mg/kg once weekly for 4 weeks and biweekly thereafter (n=47) or investigator's choice of chemotherapy (n=24). The primary end point was confirmed overall response rate (cORR) confirmed on a subsequent assessment at 8 weeks by blinded independent review. ORR was 11% (95%CI: 4-23%) and 0% (95%CI: 0-14%) in the mogamulizumab and chemotherapy arms, respectively. Best response was 28% and 8% in the respective arms. The observed hazard ratio for progression-free survival was 0.71 (95%CI: 0.41-1.21) and, after post hoc adjustment for performance status imbalance, 0.57 (95%CI: 0.337-0.983). The most frequent treatment-related adverse (grade ≥3) events with mogamulizumab were infusion-related reaction and thrombocytopenia (each 9%). Relapsed/refractory ATL is an aggressive, poor prognosis disease with a high unmet need. Investigator's choice chemotherapy did not result in tumor response in this trial; however, mogamulizumab treatment resulted in 11% cORR, with a tolerable safety profile., (Copyright© 2019 Ferrata Storti Foundation.)

Background: Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) is associated with poor prognosis, particularly in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease. Pralatrexate, a folate analogue inhibitor, was the first drug approved to treat R/R PTCL., Objective: As the distribution of PTCL subtypes differs between populations and few patients in the pivotal trial of pralatrexate were Asian, this study investigated the safety and efficacy of pralatrexate as monotherapy in Chinese patients with R/R PTCL., Patients and Methods: In this single-arm, open-label, multicenter study, 71 patients with R/R PTCL (median [range] 2 [1-14] prior systemic treatments) were recruited from 15 centers in China and received pralatrexate IV 30 mg/m 2 /week for 6 weeks in 7-week cycles (with vitamin B 12 /folate). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per central review (null hypothesis: ORR < 15%)., Results: The study's primary objective was met: ORR (95% CI) was 52% (40-64%) (p < 0.001) and responses were observed across pre-specified patient subgroups. Median (95% CI) duration of response was 8.7 (3.3-14.1) months and first response was observed in Cycle 1 for most (84%) patients. Median (95% CI) progression-free survival and overall survival was 4.8 (3.1-8.1) months and 18.0 (10.4-NA) months, respectively. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were stomatitis (68% [Grade 3/4: 20%]), anemia (49% [Grade 3/4: 24%]) and alanine aminotransferase increase (41% [Grade 3/4: 4%])., Conclusions: These results demonstrate that pralatrexate may represent a promising treatment option for Chinese patients with R/R PTCL. The ORR of 52% compared favorably with prior studies of pralatrexate in other populations and there were no unanticipated side effects., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03349333.

Introduction: Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) is a relatively rare, heterogeneous group of mature T-cell neoplasms generally associated with poor prognosis, partly because of refractoriness against conventional cytotoxic chemotherapies. To improve the outcome of patients with PTCL, the clinical development of several novel agents is currently under investigation., Areas Covered: Since the first approval of pralatrexate (dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor) by the US Food and Drug Administration, belinostat, romidepsin (histone deacetylase inhibitors), and brentuximab vedotin (anti-CD30 antibody-drug conjugate) have been approved in the US, and many other countries. In addition, mogamulizumab (anti-CC chemokine receptor 4 antibody), chidamide (histone deacetylase inhibitor), and forodesine (purine nucleoside phosphorylase inhibitor) have been approved in Asian countries, including China, and Japan. In this review, we have summarized the available data regarding these approved agents and new agents currently under development for PTCL., Expert Opinion: Novel agents will be a promising therapeutic option in selected patients with relapsed/refractory PTCL and will change the daily clinical practice in the treatment of PTCL. However, these are not a curative option when used as a single agent. Further clinical developments are expected, comprising 1) combination therapies of new agents with cytotoxic chemotherapies; 2) 'novel-novel' combinations; 3) immune therapies, including chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy; and 4) predictive marker analysis.

Pteridines are aromatic compounds formed by fused pyrazine and pyrimidine rings. Many living organisms synthesize pteridines, where they act as pigments, enzymatic cofactors, or immune system activation molecules. This variety of biological functions has motivated the synthesis of a huge number of pteridine derivatives with the aim of studying their therapeutic potential. This review gathers the state-of-the-art of pteridine derivatives, describing their biological activities and molecular targets. The antitumor activity of pteridine-based compounds is one of the most studied and advanced therapeutic potentials, for which several molecular targets have been identified. Nevertheless, pteridines are also considered as very promising therapeutics for the treatment of chronic inflammation-related diseases. On the other hand, many pteridine derivatives have been tested for antimicrobial activities but, although some of them resulted to be active in preliminary assays, a deeper research is needed in this area. Moreover, pteridines may be of use in the treatment of many other diseases, such as diabetes, osteoporosis, ischemia, or neurodegeneration, among others. Thus, the diversity of the biological activities shown by these compounds highlights the promising therapeutic use of pteridine derivatives. Indeed, methotrexate, pralatrexate, and triamterene are Food and Drug Administration approved pteridines, while many others are currently under study in clinical trials., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Here we report on the treatment of a 38-year-old woman with primary cutaneous γδT-cell lymphoma, which is a rare subset of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. She presented with multiple subtle subcutaneous nodules, which were not clearly observed on computed tomography scans or after biopsy. However, F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (F-FDG-PET) accurately detected small cutaneous lesions. She achieved a second complete remission, as demonstrated by F-FDG-PET performed after pralatrexate infusion.

The efficacy of alemtuzumab for the treatment of refractory Sézary syndrome (SS) versus other third-line agents such as pralatrexate and gemcitabine is poorly characterized. To elucidate the effectiveness of alemtuzumab versus other third-line options for the treatment of refractory SS, we conducted a meta-analysis of existing data. A systematic review was performed in March 2017 based on a search using Ovid-MEDLINE ® and OVID-EMBASE ® for articles evaluating single-agent alemtuzumab, gemcitabine, or pralatrexate for the treatment of SS and mycosis fungoides (MF). Twenty-two publications were identified that fulfilled all search criteria (total n = 323 patients), with six publications of lower quality being excluded from our analysis in order to decrease the risk of bias (final: n = 308 patients; 93 with SS and 147 with MF). Across all studies, alemtuzumab was significantly more effective in patients with SS (overall response rate [ORR]: 81%; complete response rate [CRR]: 38%) than patients with MF (ORR: 29%; CRR: 8%). However, gemcitabine was more effective than alemtuzumab or pralatrexate in treating MF. Alemtuzumab-treated patients had more frequent side effects, which were influenced by route of administration and dose. There was a lower incidence of lymphopenia and other serious adverse events in patients treated with subcutaneous (38%) compared to intravenous regimens (68%), and lower-dose (5%) compared to high-dose alemtuzumab regimens (54%). No significant differences were found in the effectiveness of different routes of administration or dosing regimens. Our review supports the use of low-dose subcutaneous alemtuzumab as a third-line treatment for SS.

Purpose of Review: Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) is a heterogeneous group of mature T-cell and natural killer (NK)-cell neoplasms in the WHO 2016 classification. Patient prognosis is poor when treated with CHOP, and there is an unmet need for new drugs. Several agents have been developed for PTCL, and their use is the subject of this review., Recent Findings: Phase 2 studies demonstrated the activity of new drugs in Relapsed/refractory PTCL. Only four compounds were approved by the food and drug administration: romidepsin and belinostat, which are epigenetic modifiers, the antifolate agent pralatrexate, the immuno-conjugate brentuximab vedotin. New combinations have been tested, but the results were disappointing. Given the latest progress in biology, targeted agents are evaluated in different subtypes of PTCL. Relapsed anaplastic large-cell lymphoma exhibits improved prognosis with the approved anti-CD30 drug conjugate brentuximab vedotin. Localized nasal NK/T is treated with radiotherapy and nonanthracycline chemotherapy with L-asparaginase. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors demonstrated activity in NK/T lymphoma and can be used in elderly patients., Summary: Treatment remains a challenge for PTCL, and several targeted drugs provide new approaches. Progress will be made incrementally in the different subtypes. One of the critical situations facing new drugs is the ability to run robust clinical trials in rare diseases.

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) are a group of rare malignancies characterized by chemotherapy resistance and poor prognosis. Romidepsin and pralatrexate were approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for patients with relapsed/refractory PTCL, exhibiting response rates of 25% and 29% respectively. Based on synergy in preclinical models of PTCL, we initiated a phase 1 study of pralatrexate plus romidepsin in patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma. This was a single institution dose-escalation study of pralatrexate plus romidepsin designed to determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), maximum tolerated dose, pharmacokinetic profile, and response rates. Patients were treated with pralatrexate (10 to 25 mg/m 2 ) and romidepsin (12 to 14 mg/m 2 ) on 1 of 3 schedules: every week × 3 every 28 days, every week × 2 every 21 days, and every other week every 28 days. Treatment continued until progression, withdrawal of consent, or medical necessity. Twenty-nine patients were enrolled and evaluable for toxicity. Coadministration of pralatrexate and romidepsin was safe, well tolerated, with 3 DLTs across all schedules (grade 3 oral mucositis × 2; grade 4 sepsis × 1). The recommended phase 2 dose was defined as pralatrexate 25 mg/m 2 and romidepsin 12 mg/m 2 every other week. Twenty-three patients were evaluable for response. The overall response rate was 57% (13/23) across all patients and 71% (10/14) in PTCL. The phase 1 study of pralatrexate plus romidepsin resulted in a high response rate in patients with previously treated PTCL. A phase 2 study in PTCL will determine the efficacy of the combination. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01947140., (© 2018 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The author declares no competing financial interests.

It has been nearly 8 years since pralatrexate became the first drug approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). Like most drugs approved for a particular clinical indication, as much or more is learned once it enters mainstream use as in the years leading up to regulatory approval. Over the past several years, many diverse lines of research have shed new insight into both the agent, and the diseases it treats. In this review, we will bring the reader up to date on the many new aspects related to pralatrexate's pharmacology, activity across the panoply of T-cell lymphoproliferative malignancies, as well as some new and emerging guidelines that are likely to improve its safety profile. Finally, the review will close with the many new lines of evidence building a rationale for the combination of these novels: novel combination, and the vision for new platforms in PTCL care.

Pralatrexate is a novel antifolate approved in the USA for the treatment of relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma. To assess its safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics in Japanese patients with this disease, we undertook a phase I/II study. Pralatrexate was given i.v. weekly for 6 weeks of a 7-week cycle. All patients received concurrent vitamin B 12 and folic acid. In phase I, three patients received pralatrexate 30 mg/m 2 and none experienced a dose-limiting toxicity. In phase II, we treated 22 additional patients with that dose. The median number of treatment cycles was 1 (range, 1-9). Nine of 20 evaluable patients (45%) achieved an objective response by central review, including two complete responses. All responses occurred within the first treatment cycle. At the time of data cut-off, median progression-free survival was 150 days. Median overall survival was not reached. In the total population, the most commonly reported adverse events included mucositis (88%), thrombocytopenia (68%), liver function test abnormality (64%), anemia (60%), and lymphopenia (56%). Grade 3/4 adverse events included lymphopenia (52%), thrombocytopenia (40%), leukopenia (28%), neutropenia (24%), anemia (20%), and mucositis (20%). The pharmacokinetic profile showed no drug accumulation with repeat dosing. These results indicate that pralatrexate is generally well tolerated and effective in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02013362)., (© 2017 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Purpose: Pralatrexate is a folic acid analogue metabolic inhibitor similar to methotrexate, which has shown tolerability and efficacy with an overall response rate of 45% in a phase I dose deescalation study of patients with relapsed/refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Experimental Design: The object of this phase I/II open-label, multicenter clinical trial was to determine the MTD and recommended dose of pralatrexate plus oral bexarotene in 34 patients with relapsed/refractory CTCL who had failed prior systemic therapies. Pralatrexate was administered by intravenous push at 15 mg/m 2 given weekly 3 weeks out of 4 weeks with daily oral bexarotene (150 or 300 mg/m 2 ), levothyroxine, atorvastatin, folate, and with B12 every 2 months. Results: At the MTD of 15 mg/m 2 bexarotene and 15 mg/m 2 pralatrexate, the response rate was 60% [4 complete responses (CR), 14 partial responses (PR)], the maximum observed response duration was 28.9+ months, and duration of response for 4 CRs ranged from 9.0 to 28.3 months. The median progression-free survival was 12.8 months (0.5-29.9). Mucositis was the most common adverse event. Conclusions: The combination of pralatrexate (15 mg/m 2 ) and oral bexarotene (150 mg/m 2 ) is active with high response rates and minimal toxicity for cutaneous T-cell lymphomas. Clin Cancer Res; 23(14); 3552-6. ©2017 AACR ., (©2017 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) are a heterogeneous group of mature T-cell malignancies associated with exceptionally poor prognoses. Currently, chemotherapy remains the standard of care, but outcomes are suboptimal, with 5-year survival rates ranging from 15% to 25%. In recent years, several novel agents, including pralatrexate, romidepsin, belinostat, and brentuximab vedotin, have been approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory PTCL. In addition, numerous other therapies with different mechanisms of action and targets are currently under investigation. This article discusses in detail agents currently available, those currently under investigation, and active combination trials., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Survival outcome of patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma-not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS) and angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) who experience disease progression/relapse remains very poor. A total of 321 patients, newly diagnosed with PTCL-NOS (n = 180) or AITL (n = 141) between 1999 and 2015, were analysed. Failure-free survival (FFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the time of first disease progression (FFS1, OS1), from second disease progression (FFS2, OS2) and from third progression (FFS3, OS3). With a median follow-up duration of 52 months, 240 patients (135 PTCL-NOS, 105 AITL) experienced progression/relapse. In patients with PTCL-NOS, the median durations of FFS1, FFS2 and FFS3 were 3·1, 2·5 and 2·1 months, respectively. In patients with AITL, they were 5·5, 2·9 and 2·3 months, respectively. There was no improvement in FFS1 and OS1 by the time of recurrence during this period (1999-2004, 2005-2009 and 2010-2015). The median FFS after pralatrexate and romidepsin was only 3·0 and 2·5 months, respectively. The 5-year OS rates after salvage autologous and allogeneic transplant were 32% and 52%, respectively; while the 5-year OS rates for patients who did not undergo transplant was 10%. Further research for novel therapeutic approaches with higher efficacy and better safety profile are needed., (© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Pralatrexate (PTXT) is an antineoplastic folate analog and the chemical name is (2S)-2-[[4-[(1RS)-1-[(2,4-diaminopteridin-6-yl)methyl]but-3-ynyl] benzoyl] amino] pentanedioic acid. Degradation products of PTXT drug product (DP) under different forced degradation conditions have been studied using LC-PDA and LC-MS techniques. PTXT DP was subjected to forced degradation under the conditions of hydrolysis, photolysis, oxidation, and heat in accordance with ICH guidelines. The LC-MS compatible HPLC method was developed and stressed solutions were chromatographed on reversed phase HPLC. The degradation products were monitored at a wavelength of 242nm. Stress study revealed that PTXT was sensitive towards acid, alkali, peroxide, light and heat. The degradation impurities (I-IX) were identified and characterized using LC-PDA and mass spectral data., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)