Search

Aims: To compare the blood pressure (BP)-lowering efficacy of a chlorthalidone/amiloride combination pill with losartan, during initial management of JNC 7 Stage I hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus., Methods: In an a priori subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial, volunteers aged 30-70 years, with stage I hypertension and diabetes mellitus, were randomized to 12.5/2.5 mg of chlorthalidone/amiloride (N = 47) or 50 mg of losartan (N = 50), and followed for 18 months in 21 clinical centers. If BP remained uncontrolled after three months, study medication dose was doubled, and if uncontrolled after six months, amlodipine (5 and 10 mg) and propranolol (40 and 80 mg BID) were added as open label drugs in a progressive fashion., Results: Systolic BP decreased to a greater extent in participants allocated to diuretics compared to losartan (P < 0.001). After 18 months of follow-up, systolic BP was 128.4 ± 10.3 mmHg in the diuretic group versus 133.5 ± 8.0 in the losartan group (P < 0.01). In the diuretic group, 36 out of 43 participants (83.7%) had a JNC 7 normal BP, compared to 31/47 (66%) in the losartan group (P = 0.089). Serum cholesterol was higher in the diuretic arm at the end of the trial. Other biochemical parameters and reports of adverse events did not differ by treatment., Conclusions: Treatment of hypertension based on a combination of chlorthalidone and amiloride is more effective for BP lowering compared to losartan in patients with diabetes mellitus and hypertension., Trial Registration: Clinical trials registration number: NCT00971165.

Effective pharmacological neuroprotection is one of the most desired aims in modern medicine. We postulated that a combination of two clinically used drugs-nimodipine (L-Type voltage-gated calcium channel blocker) and amiloride (acid-sensing ion channel inhibitor)-might act synergistically in an experimental model of ischaemia, targeting the intracellular rise in calcium as a pathway in neuronal cell death. We used organotypic hippocampal slices of mice pups and a well-established regimen of oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD) to assess a possible neuroprotective effect. Neither nimodipine (at 10 or 20 µM) alone or in combination with amiloride (at 100 µM) showed any amelioration. Dissolved at 2.0 Vol.% dimethyl-sulfoxide (DMSO), the combination of both components even increased cell damage ( p = 0.0001), an effect not observed with amiloride alone. We conclude that neither amiloride nor nimodipine do offer neuroprotection in an in vitro ischaemia model. On a technical note, the use of DMSO should be carefully evaluated in neuroprotective experiments, since it possibly alters cell damage.

Amiloride is a potassium retaining diuretic and natriuretic which acts by reversibly blocking luminal epithelial sodium channels (ENaCs) in the late distal tubule and collecting duct. Amiloride is indicated in oedematous states, and for potassium conservation adjunctive to thiazide or loop diuretics for hypertension, congestive heart failure and hepatic cirrhosis with ascites. Historical studies on its use in hypertension were poorly controlled and there is insufficient data on dose-response. It is clearly highly effective in combination with thiazide diuretics where it counteracts the adverse metabolic effects of the thiazides and its use in the Medical Research Council Trial of Older Hypertensive Patients, demonstrated convincing outcome benefits on stroke and coronary events. Recently it has been shown to be as effective as spironolactone in resistant hypertension but there is a real need to establish its potential role in the much larger number of patients with mild to moderate hypertension in whom there is a paucity of information with amiloride particularly across an extended dose range.

Background: Thiazide diuretics have demonstrated favorable blood pressure lowering efficacy, but the equivalent doses of their more common agents, chlorthalidone and hydrochlorothiazide, are still unclear. Further, concerns exist regarding adverse metabolic effects, which may be attenuated with the concomitant administration of a potassium-sparing diuretic, such as amiloride. This trial aims to investigate the efficacy of chlorthalidone and hydrochlorothiazide, in combination with amiloride at different doses, for initial management of patients with primary hypertension., Methods/design: This is a factorial (2 × 2) randomized double-blinded clinical trial comparing the association of a thiazide diuretic (chlorthalidone 25 mg/day or hydrochlorothiazide 50 mg/day) with a potassium-sparing diuretic (amiloride 10 mg/day or amiloride 20 mg/day) in patients with primary hypertension. The primary outcome will be the mean change from baseline in 24-h systolic and diastolic blood pressure measured by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. The secondary outcomes will be the mean change from baseline in daytime and nighttime systolic and diastolic blood pressure measured by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, mean change from baseline in systolic and diastolic blood pressure measured by office blood pressure, incidence of adverse events, variation of laboratory parameters, and proportion of patients who achieved blood pressure control. The follow-up will last 12 weeks. For a P alpha of 0.05, power of 80%, standard deviation of 9 mmHg, and absolute difference of 6 mmHg on systolic blood pressure on 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, it will be necessary to study a total of 76 patients. The sample size will be increased by 10% to compensate for losses, resulting in 84 patients being randomized., Discussion: Diuretics are pivotal drugs for the treatment of hypertension. Chlorthalidone and hydrochlorothiazide, in combination with amiloride in multiple doses, will be tested in terms of blood pressure lowering efficacy and safety. Since the intensity of blood pressure reduction is the major determinant of reduction in cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients, this study will help to determine which combination of diuretics represents the most appropriate treatment for this population., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03928145. Registered on 25 April 2019. Last update on 29 April 2019.

Background: Antihypertensive treatment improves echocardiographic parameters of hypertensive target organ damage in stage II hypertension, but less is known about the effects in stage I hypertension., Methods: In a cohort study nested in the randomized double-blind trial PREVER-treatment, 2-dimensional echocardiograms were performed in 110 individuals, aged 54.8 ± 7.9 years-old, with stage I hypertension at baseline and after 18 months of treatment with chlorthalidone/amiloride or losartan., Results: At baseline, 66 (60%) participants had concentric remodeling. After antihypertensive treatment, systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (BP) were reduced from 141/90 to 130/83 mm Hg (P = 0.009). There was a significant reduction in left ventricular (LV) mass (LVM) index (82.7 ± 17.1 to 79.2 ± 17.5 g/m2; P = 0.005) and relative wall thickness (0.45 ± 0.06 to 0.42 ± 0.05; P < 0.001), increasing the proportion of participants with normal LV geometry (31% to 49%, P = 0.006). Left atrial (LA) volume index reduced (26.8 ± 7.3 to 24.9 ± 6.5 ml/m2; P = 0.001), and mitral E-wave deceleration time increased (230 ± 46 to 247 ± 67 ms; P = 0.005), but there was no change in other parameters of diastolic function. LVM reduction was significantly higher in the 2 higher tertiles of SBP reduction compared to the lower tertile., Conclusions: Treatment of patients with stage I hypertension for 18 months promotes favorable effects in the LA and LV remodeling. This improvement in cardiac end-organ damage might be associated with reduction of long term clinical consequences of hypertensive cardiomyopathy, particularly heart failure with preserved ejection fraction., (© American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd 2017. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com)

Purpose: The search for new drugs that control the continuous relapses of multiple myeloma is still required. Here, we report for the first time the potent antimyeloma activity of amiloride, an old potassium-sparing diuretic approved for the treatment of hypertension and edema due to heart failure. Experimental Design: Myeloma cell lines and primary samples were used to evaluate cytotoxicity of amiloride. In vivo studies were carried out in a xenograft mouse model. The mechanisms of action were investigated using RNA-Seq experiments, qRT-PCR, immunoblotting, and immunofluorescence assays. Results: Amiloride-induced apoptosis was observed in a broad panel of multiple myeloma cell lines and in a xenograft mouse model. Moreover, amiloride also had a synergistic effect when combined with dexamethasone, melphalan, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide. RNA-Seq experiments showed that amiloride not only significantly altered the level of transcript isoforms and alternative splicing events, but also deregulated the spliceosomal machinery. In addition, disruption of the splicing machinery in immunofluorescence studies was associated with the inhibition of myeloma cell viability after amiloride exposure. Although amiloride was able to induce apoptosis in myeloma cells lacking p53 expression, activation of p53 signaling was observed in wild-type and mutated TP53 cells after amiloride exposure. On the other hand, we did not find a significant systemic toxicity in mice treated with amiloride. Conclusions: Overall, our results demonstrate the antimyeloma activity of amiloride and provide a mechanistic rationale for its use as an alternative treatment option for relapsed multiple myeloma patients, especially those with 17p deletion or TP53 mutations that are resistant to current therapies. Clin Cancer Res; 23(21); 6602-15. ©2017 AACR ., (©2017 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Treatment of hypertension reduces incidence of stroke, myocardial infarction and heart failure perhaps partly by controlling different metabolic parameters. There is limited information regarding the changes in potassium, sodium, weight, cholesterol and glucose levels in patients using anti-hypertensives. This study aimed to determine changes in potassium, sodium, glucose, cholesterol, weight, urea and urate levels in patients using anti-hypertensives. Furthermore, to describe these changes and differences between the atenolol, hydrochlorothiazide plus amiloride and placebo arms of the Medical Research Council (MRC) elderly randomised controlled trial., Methods: Patients were randomly allocated to one of the three treatment arms. Measurements were taken at baseline, end of year one and end of year two in 4396 subjects. Linear Mixed Models (LMM) were used to determine the longitudinal profiles of sodium, potassium, weight, cholesterol, glucose, urea and urate. Estimates of changes within groups and difference between groups were obtained., Results: Patients randomised to receive hydrochlorothiazide + amiloride experienced a significantly greater mean reduction in potassium, sodium and weight compared to placebo at end of year one - mean differences in change -0.18 mmol/L, (95 % CI: -0.21, -0.15); -1.45 mmol/L, (95 % CI: -1.62, -1.29) and -0.46 kgs (95 % CI: -0.73, -0.20) respectively, and greater increases in cholesterol, urea and urate - mean differences in change 0.16 mmol/L, (95 % CI: 0.10,0.22); 0.77 mmol/L, (95 % CI: 0.68, 0.87) and 53.10 μmol/L, (95 % CI: 49.35, 56.85) respectively. Changes were in the same direction but smaller in the atenololarm except for potassium and weight (increases). No group differences in glucose were found., Conclusion: Results were in line with expectation except for lack of change in glucose in the hydrochlorothiazide + amiloride arms.

Introduction: Thiazide diuretics are associated with increased risk of diabetes mellitus. This risk may arise from K(+)-depletion. We hypothesised that a K(+)-sparing diuretic will improve glucose tolerance, and that combination of low-dose thiazide with K(+)-sparing diuretic will improve both blood pressure reduction and glucose tolerance, compared to a high-dose thiazide., Methods and Analysis: This is a parallel-group, randomised, double-blind, multicentre trial, comparing hydrochlorothiazide 25-50 mg, amiloride 10-20 mg and combination of both diuretics at half these doses. A single-blind placebo run-in of 1 month is followed by 24 weeks of blinded active treatment. There is forced dose-doubling after 3 months. The Primary end point is the blood glucose 2 h after oral ingestion of a 75 g glucose drink (OGTT), following overnight fasting. The primary outcome is the difference between 2 h glucose at weeks 0, 12 and 24. Secondary outcomes include the changes in home systolic blood pressure (BP) and glycated haemoglobin and prediction of response by baseline plasma renin. Eligibility criteria are: age 18-79, systolic BP on permitted background treatment ≥ 140 mm Hg and home BP ≥ 130 mm Hg and one component of the metabolic syndrome additional to hypertension. Principal exclusions are diabetes, estimated-glomerular filtration rate <45 mL/min, abnormal plasma K(+), clinic SBP >200 mm Hg or DBP >120 mm Hg (box 2). The sample size calculation indicates that 486 patients will give 80% power at α=0.01 to detect a difference in means of 1 mmol/L (SD=2.2) between 2 h glucose on hydrochlorothiazide and comparators., Ethics and Dissemination: PATHWAY-3 was approved by Cambridge South Ethics Committee, number 09/H035/19. The trial results will be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal., Trial Registration Numbers: Eudract number 2009-010068-41 and clinical trials registration number: NCT02351973., (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.)

Background and Purpose: Inhaled amiloride, a blocker of the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC), enhances mucociliary clearance (MCC) in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. However, the dose of amiloride is limited by the mechanism-based side effect of hyperkalaemia resulting from renal ENaC blockade. Inhaled ENaC blockers with a reduced potential to induce hyperkalaemia provide a therapeutic strategy to improve mucosal hydration and MCC in the lungs of CF patients. The present study describes the preclinical profile of a novel ENaC blocker, NVP-QBE170, designed for inhaled delivery, with a reduced potential to induce hyperkalaemia., Experimental Approach: The in vitro potency and duration of action of NVP-QBE170 were compared with amiloride and a newer ENaC blocker, P552-02, in primary human bronchial epithelial cells (HBECs) by short-circuit current. In vivo efficacy and safety were assessed in guinea pig (tracheal potential difference/hyperkalaemia), rat (hyperkalaemia) and sheep (MCC)., Key Results: In vitro, NVP-QBE170 potently inhibited ENaC function in HBEC and showed a longer duration of action to comparator molecules. In vivo, intratracheal (i.t.) instillation of NVP-QBE170 attenuated ENaC activity in the guinea pig airways with greater potency and duration of action than that of amiloride without inducing hyperkalaemia in either guinea pig or rat. Dry powder inhalation of NVP-QBE170 by conscious sheep increased MCC and was better than inhaled hypertonic saline in terms of efficacy and duration of action., Conclusions and Implications: NVP-QBE170 highlights the potential for inhaled ENaC blockers to exhibit efficacy in the airways with a reduced risk of hyperkalaemia, relative to existing compounds., (© 2015 The British Pharmacological Society.)

Patients with Gitelman syndrome (GS), an inherited salt-losing tubulopathy, are usually treated with potassium-sparing diuretics or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and oral potassium and magnesium supplementations. However, evidence supporting these treatment options is limited to case series studies. We designed an open-label, randomized, crossover study with blind end point evaluation to compare the efficacy and safety of 6-week treatments with one time daily 75 mg slow-release indomethacin, 150 mg eplerenone, or 20 mg amiloride added to constant potassium and magnesium supplementation in 30 patients with GS (individual participation: 48 weeks). Baseline plasma potassium concentration was 2.8±0.4 mmol/L and increased by 0.38 mmol/L (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.23 to 0.53; P<0.001) with indomethacin, 0.15 mmol/L (95% CI, 0.02 to 0.29; P=0.03) with eplerenone, and 0.19 mmol/L (95% CI, 0.05 to 0.33; P<0.01) with amiloride. Fifteen patients became normokalemic: six with indomethacin, three with eplerenone, and six with amiloride. Indomethacin significantly reduced eGFR and plasma renin concentration. Eplerenone and amiloride each increased plasma aldosterone by 3-fold and renin concentration slightly but did not significantly change eGFR. BP did not significantly change. Eight patients discontinued treatment early because of gastrointestinal intolerance to indomethacin (six patients) and hypotension with eplerenone (two patients). In conclusion, each drug increases plasma potassium concentration in patients with GS. Indomethacin was the most effective but can cause gastrointestinal intolerance and decreased eGFR. Amiloride and eplerenone have similar but lower efficacies and increase sodium depletion. The benefit/risk ratio of each drug should be carefully evaluated for each patient., (Copyright © 2015 by the American Society of Nephrology.)

Background: Severe hyperkalemia is a life threatening condition that can cause fatal rhythm disturbance and terminal heart arrest. The most common cause of hyperkalemia in older patients is that of iatrogenic medication-related etiology due to associated polymorbidity, polypharmacy and reduced reserve metabolic capacity. The aim of this paper is to increase awareness in the clinicians of the risk of hyperkalemia in elderly patients treated by potassium sparing drugs., Methods and Results: We present two case reports of hyperkalemia ≥ 9.0 mmol/L induced by potassium sparing medications with cardiac arrhythmias and severe ECG changes including atrial asystole, disturbance of intraventricular conduction and morphological changes such as tenting T waves and deformed wide QRS complexes. The most frequent causes of hyperkalemia in elderly patients are discussed and electrocardiogram changes and arrhythmias in hyperkalemia are analyzed, as well as their treatment and prevention., Conclusion: Potassium sparing drug therapy in older persons requires more frequent monitoring especially when drugs or their doses are changed, or during concomitant acute illness.

Introduction: Myocardial fibrosis is dysrhythmogenic and may contribute to the high incidence of cardiac death in stroke survivors, especially if they have long QTc. We tested the hypothesis that procollagen-1-carboxy terminal peptide (P1CP), a biomarker of myocardial fibrosis, might be improved following treatment with spironolactone or amiloride in stroke survivors. We also tested the hypothesis that both drugs would shorten QTc., Study Design: randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial (spironolactone vs. amiloride vs. placebo). Duration of Study: 3 months (1 month per drug). Primary endpoints: P1CP, QTc, Results: 11 stroke survivors (5 female), aged 71 ± 4, BP 139/81 mmHg ± 20/11 mmHg, completed the study. Both spironolactone and amiloride significantly reduced P1CP [Spironolactone-Placebo = -24 ug/L, 95% CI = -40 to -6.9; Amiloride-Placebo = -28 ug/L, 95% CI = -44 to -11]. Spironolactone and amiloride both shortened QTc [Spironolactone vs. Placebo=-18 ms(1/2), 95% CI = -36 to -0.55; Amiloride vs Placebo = -25 ms(1/2), 95% CI = -42 to -7.5]., Conclusions: Procollagen-1-carboxy terminal peptide was reduced following treatment with spironolactone within a month. Further, this is the first study demonstrating amiloride could also improve myocardial fibrosis. The beneficial effects of both drugs on myocardial fibrosis, coupled with their effects on raising potassium translated to a shortening of QTc. Future studies should test the hypothesis that these drugs might reduce the risk of sudden cardiac death in stroke survivors., (© 2013.)

Hypertension guidelines advise limiting the dose of thiazide diuretics and avoiding combination with β-blockade, because of increased risk of diabetes mellitus. We tested whether changes in the 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test could be detected after 4 weeks of treatment with a thiazide and could be avoided by switching to amiloride. Two double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover studies were performed. In study 1 (41 patients), we found that changes in glucose during a 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test could be detected after 4 weeks of treatment with bendroflumethiazide. In study 2, 37 patients with essential hypertension received, in random order, 4 weeks of once-daily treatment with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 to 50 mg, nebivolol 5 to 10 mg, combination (HCTZ 25-50 mg+nebivolol 5-10 mg), amiloride (10-20 mg), and placebo. Each drug was force titrated at 2 weeks and separated by a 4-week placebo washout. At each visit, we recorded blood pressure and performed a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test. Primary outcome was the difference in glucose (over the 2 hours of the oral glucose tolerance test) between 0 and 4 weeks, when HCTZ and amiloride were compared by repeated-measures analysis. For similar blood pressure reductions, there were opposite changes in glucose between the 2 diuretics (P<0.0001). Nebivolol did not impair glucose tolerance, either alone or in combination. There was a negative correlation between Δpotassium and Δ2-hour glucose (r=-0.28; P<0.0001). In 2 crossover studies, 4 weeks of treatment with a thiazide diuretic impaired glucose tolerance. No impairment was seen with K(+)-sparing diuretic or β(1)-selective blockade. Substitution or addition of amiloride may be the solution to preventing thiazide-induced diabetes mellitus.

Background and Objectives: Antihypertensive therapy is effective in reducing the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. However, blood pressure (BP) control rate remains poor and the optimal combination therapy against hypertension is not established in China. The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of two antihypertensive regimens, amlodipine plus telmisartan and amlodipine plus amiloride/hydrochlorothiazide, in patients with essential hypertension and at least one cardiovascular risk factor., Methods: In a multicenter open-label clinical trial, eligible patients were randomized to receive treatment with amlodipine 2.5-5 mg plus amiloride/hydrochlorothiazide 1.25-2.5 mg/12.5-25 mg (Group A) or amlodipine 2.5-5 mg plus telmisartan 40-80 mg (Group T). If a target BP was not reached, other antihypertensive agents would be added. The target BP was <130/80 mmHg for patients with diabetes mellitus or chronic kidney disease and <140/90 mmHg for others. Efficacy variables were changes from baseline in systolic BP and diastolic BP at the endpoint of 96 weeks. Safety evaluations included monitoring of any adverse events (AEs)., Results: Of 13,542 patients randomized, 13,080 (96.6%) completed the study: 6529 in Group A and 6551 in Group T. At endpoint, the BP levels were reduced by 27.4/14.3 mmHg in Group A and 27.1/14.5 mmHg in Group T. The BP control rates were similar for the two therapeutic regimens (87.5% vs 86.1%). Less than 4% of patients in each group discontinued their drugs during follow-up. Peripheral edema was one of the most common AEs, and occurred in only 24 patients in Group A and 19 in Group T., Conclusions: Long-term combination therapy with amlodipine plus telmisartan or amlodipine plus amiloride/hydrochlorothiazide was not only well tolerated but also efficacious in reducing BP levels with acceptable control rates in the majority of hypertensive patients., Clinical Trials Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01011660.

Background: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in Brazil, and hypertension is its major risk factor. The benefit of its drug treatment to prevent major cardiovascular events was consistently demonstrated. Angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB) have been the preferential drugs in the management of hypertension worldwide, despite the absence of any consistent evidence of advantage over older agents, and the concern that they may be associated with lower renal protection and risk for cancer. Diuretics are as efficacious as other agents, are well tolerated, have longer duration of action and low cost, but have been scarcely compared with ARBs. A study comparing diuretic and ARB is therefore warranted., Methods/design: This is a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial, comparing the association of chlorthalidone and amiloride with losartan as first drug option in patients aged 30 to 70 years, with stage I hypertension. The primary outcomes will be variation of blood pressure by time, adverse events and development or worsening of microalbuminuria and of left ventricular hypertrophy in the EKG. The secondary outcomes will be fatal or non-fatal cardiovascular events: myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, evidence of new subclinical atherosclerosis and sudden death. The study will last 18 months. The sample size will be of 1200 participants for group in order to confer enough power to test for all primary outcomes. The project was approved by the Ethics committee of each participating institution., Discussion: The putative pleiotropic effects of ARB agents, particularly renal protection, have been disputed, and they have been scarcely compared with diuretics in large clinical trials, despite that they have been at least as efficacious as newer agents in managing hypertension. Even if the null hypothesis is not rejected, the information will be useful for health care policy to treat hypertension in Brazil., Clinical Trials Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00971165.

Current investigation aimed to develop a novel Amiloride loaded mucoadhesive nanoemulsion formulation for nose-to-brain delivery. Furthermore, nasal irritation study and histopathological examination of the nasal mucosa were also carried out to assess nonirritant nature of the nanoemulsion. The optimized formulation, surface epithelium lining and the granular cellular structure of the nasal mucosa were totally intact, whereas KCl caused major changes in the ultrastructure of mucosa. Amiloride loaded mucoadhesive nanoemulsion formulations are non toxic on nasal mucosa and can be administered by intranasal route for effective treatment of epilepsy.

In a screen for RNA mutagen resistance, we isolated a high fidelity RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) variant of Coxsackie virus B3 (CVB3). Curiously, this variant A372V is also resistant to amiloride. We hypothesize that amiloride has a previously undescribed mutagenic activity. Indeed, amiloride compounds increase the mutation frequencies of CVB3 and poliovirus and high fidelity variants of both viruses are more resistant to this effect. We hypothesize that this mutagenic activity is mediated through alterations in intracellular ions such as Mg²+ and Mn²+, which in turn increase virus mutation frequency by affecting RdRp fidelity. Furthermore, we show that another amiloride-resistant RdRp variant, S299T, is completely resistant to this mutagenic activity and unaffected by changes in ion concentrations. We show that RdRp variants resist the mutagenic activity of amiloride via two different mechanisms: 1) increased fidelity that generates virus populations presenting lower basal mutation frequencies or 2) resisting changes in divalent cation concentrations that affect polymerase fidelity. Our results uncover a new antiviral approach based on mutagenesis.

1. The diuretic amiloride is known to modulate the activity of several types of ion channels and membrane receptors in addition to its inhibitory effects on many ion transport systems. However, the effects of amiloride on some important ion channels and receptors, such as GABA(A) receptors, in the central nervous system have not been characterized. 2. In the present study, we investigated the functional action of amiloride on native GABA(A) receptors in cultured neurons of rat inferior colliculus using whole-cell patch-clamp recordings. 3. Amiloride reversibly inhibited the amplitude of the GABA-induced current (I(GABA)) in a concentration-dependent manner (IC(50) 454 +/- 24 micromol/L) under conditions of voltage-clamp with a holding potential at -60 mV. The inhibition depended on drug application mode and was independent of membrane potential. Amiloride did not change the reversal potential of I(GABA). Moreover, amiloride induced a parallel right-ward shift in the concentration-response curve for I(GABA) without altering the maximal value and Hill coefficient. 4. The present study shows that amiloride competitively inhibits the current mediated by native GABA(A) receptors in the brain region, probably via a direct action on GABA-binding sites on the receptor. The findings suggest that the functional actions of amiloride on GABA(A) receptors may result in possible side-effects on the central nervous system in the case of direct application of this drug into the cerebrospinal fluid for treatment of diseases such as brain tumours.

Background/aims: Chronic evolution after drug-induced liver injury (DILI) has been reported. How often this leads to liver-related morbidity and mortality is unexplored., Methods: Patients who survived DILI and concomitant jaundice reported to the Swedish Adverse Drug Reaction Advisory Committee (1970-2004) were linked to the Swedish Hospital Discharge and Cause of Death Registries., Results: Among the 712 survivors, 27 could not be retrieved but 685 patients could be linked to the registries, 392 females (57.2%) and 293 males (42.8%) median age 58 (41-74), a mean follow-up of 10 years. A total of 23/685 (3.4%) patients had been hospitalized for liver disease and 5 had liver-related mortality. Eight patients developed cirrhosis (7 decompensated, 5 died), 5 had "cryptogenic" cirrhosis in which DILI might have played a role in this development. Duration of therapy before DILI was longer in patients with liver-related morbidity/mortality (135+/-31 days vs. 53+/-3; p<0.0001). Autoimmune hepatitis developed in 5/23 (22%), all of female gender after a mean of 5.8 years., Conclusions: Development of clinically important liver disease after severe DILI associated with jaundice is rare after acute DILI. However decompensated "cryptogenic" cirrhosis developed in some patients with fatal outcome in which DILI might have played a role in this development.

Understanding the strengths and limitations of alternative models, such as the Tg.AC assay, for evaluation of the potential carcinogenicity of pharmaceuticals requires assessment of assay specificity through studies that specifically target biologically active compounds that are known to not be carcinogens in rodents. To identify drugs that might provoke a false positive response in the Tg.AC assay, we screened pharmaceuticals for in vitro induction of the gadd153 promoter and the zeta-globin promoter. We have previously found a high correlation between induction of the gadd153 promoter in HepG2 cells and activity in the Tg.AC assay. The three drugs selected through screening 99 noncarcinogenic pharmaceuticals were amiloride, dipyridamole, and pyrimethamine. A 26-week skin paint study was conducted in hemizygous Tg.AC mice with the three drugs at two doses selected by a 4-week dose range finding study. Evidence of systemic toxicity was observed in animals dosed chronically with pyrimethamine or amiloride, but no skin papillomas were observed in mice treated with amiloride, dipyridamole, or pyrimethamine for 26 weeks. All male mice and 80% of female mice treated with 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) in acetone developed a maximal tumor burden. However, mice treated with TPA in a vehicle containing 2.4% DMSO had greatly reduced incidences of papillomas. In summary, the correct negative response was shown in the Tg.AC assay for three noncarcinogenic pharmaceuticals, which adds further favorable evidence of appropriate specificity of this model system. However, vehicle composition must be carefully selected because the outcome of this assay can be confounded by certain commonly used solvents.

Objectives: To review Australian adverse drug reaction reports describing hyponatraemia and hypokalaemia attributed to indapamide and compare the characteristics of the patients with those in Australian reports implicating two other diuretic products (hydrochlorothiazide and amiloride hydrochloride; chlorothiazide)., Design: Descriptive analysis using reports from the database of the Adverse Drug Reactions Advisory Committee (ADRAC)., Main Outcome Measures: Numbers of reports of hyponatraemia and hypokalaemia; proportion of such reports in total reports of adverse reactions to each drug; severity of electrolyte disturbances., Results: Between August 1984 and September 2000, 84 Australian reports of hyponatraemia and 87 reports of hypokalaemia, in which indapamide was the sole suspected drug, were submitted to ADRAC. Most reports involved an indapamide dose of 2.5 mg daily. There was a significantly greater proportion of reports of hyponatraemia with indapamide and with the hydrochlorothiazide and amiloride combination than with chlorothiazide; hypokalaemia was significantly more common for indapamide than for the other two drugs. Of the 87 reports of hypokalaemia with indapamide, 35 patients also had hyponatraemia. For all three drugs, at least 80% of reports of hyponatraemia were in people aged 65 or over, and electrolyte disturbance was most commonly reported in elderly women., Conclusions: Hyponatraemia and hypokalaemia have been described in 20.9% and 21.7%, respectively, of reports to ADRAC in which indapamide was the sole suspected drug. The electrolyte disturbances can be severe.

Background and Objective: Cognitive impairment occurs more frequently in hypertensives than in normotensive individuals. Early signs of cognitive impairment are predictors of dementia in late life. Felodipine is capable of almost normalizing plasma viscosity, which is elevated in most of hypertensive patients, thus improving microcirculation. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether this hemorheologic property of felodipine in addition to its blood pressure lowering effect can improve cognitive performance in hypertensive patients., Patients and Methods: Randomized, double-blind comparison between felodipine 10 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 50 mg amiloride 5 mg (HCT/amiloride) in patients 50-70 years of age with impaired cognitive function (c.l. test 1-2 points) and with resting blood pressure values of diastolic > 95 and < or = 115 mmHg and/or systolic > 160 and < or = 210 mmHg. Blood pressure measurements and evaluation of total short term storage capacity were done at the beginning and after 12 weeks of treatment., Results: 31 patients (14 felodipine and 17 HCT/amiloride) were included in the per protocol analysis. Blood pressure values at the beginning and after 12 weeks of treatment were (mmHg): for felodipine systolic 168 +/- 4 and 150 +/- 6 (p < 0.01), diastolic 108 +/- 3 and 88 +/- 4 (p < 0.001). For amiloride/HCT systolic 173 +/- 8 and 150 +/- 10 (p < 0.01), diastolic 105 +/- 5 and 88 +/- 5 (p < 0.001). Short term storage capacity improved by 15 +/- 6 bits during felodipine treatment (p < 0.001) and by 9 +/- 9 bits during amiloride/HCT treatment (p < 0.05). Thus cognitive improvement was superior by 67% in the felodipine group compared to amiloride/HCT (p < 0.05)., Conclusion: In this study a pronounced improvement of mental performance occurred in patients treated with felodipine. Since the cognitive gain was significantly superior to amiloride/HCT treatment there must be an additional blood pressure-independent effect of felodipine, such as enhancing microcirculation. Whether these properties possibly counteract the development of dementia in hypertensives has to be evaluated in long term studies in more patients.

A 85-year-old woman treated with, among other drugs, a thiazide diuretic presented with a severe hyponatraemia. She met several of the criteria for SIADH and, besides drugs, no cause for SIADH was found. After stopping the thiazide diuretic and restricting fluid intake the patient recovered fully. It was later proved that the thiazide was the cause of the water intoxication by rechallenging the patient with a single dose of amiloride/hydrochlorothiazide 5/50 mg. This "thiazide provocation test" showed its usefulness in the differential diagnosis of suspected SIADH. Moreover, the test demonstrated the paradoxal effect of thiazide diuretics to cause water retention in susceptible patients.

Study Objective: To highlight the dangers of a precipitous rise in serum potassium levels in patients at risk for renal insufficiency, already receiving an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, who are given a potassium-sparing diuretic., Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of five patients who were taking the above combination of medications who were seen in our ED with hyperkalemia., Results: All five patients had diabetes and were older than 50 years of age. Except for one patient, they had some degree of renal impairment and all were receiving an ACE inhibitor. Each had amiloride HCl/hydrochlorothiazide added to their therapeutic regimen 8 to 18 days before presenting to our ED with hyperkalemia. Potassium levels were between 9.4 and 11 mEq/L in 4 of the patients; 2 did not respond to resuscitation measures., Conclusion: The concomitant use of ACE inhibitor and potassium-sparing diuretic therapy should be avoided. If impossible, weekly monitoring of both renal function and serum potassium should be performed. In the ED patients who are receiving such a combination should receive immediate ECG monitoring.

Study Objective: To compare the pharmacokinetics and systemic exposure of nebulized and oral amiloride in adolescents and adults with mild to moderate cystic fibrosis (CF)., Design: Open-label, randomized, two-way crossover, single-dose pharmacokinetic study., Setting: University hospital clinical research unit., Patients: Nine adolescents and 10 adults with mild to moderate CF (forced expiratory volume in 1 sec > or = 50% predicted, Brasfield score > or = 15)., Interventions: Patients received amiloride solution orally (10 mg of amiloride 1-mg/ml solution) and by inhalation [4.5 ml amiloride of 1-mg/ml solution in 12% saline (approximately 3.8 mmol/L) by DeVilbiss 646 nebulizer] during two study phases separated by a 7- to 28-day washout period. Serial blood and urine samples were collected for 48 and 72 hours, respectively., Measurements and Main Results: After oral dosing, the mean +/- SD maximum peak concentration (Cmax) was 20.6 +/- 10.0 ng/ml at 3.2 +/- 1.2 hours in adults and 21.7 +/- 4.88 at 2.9 +/- 0.6 hours in the adolescents. Mean area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to infinity hours was 275 +/- 115 and 254 +/- 60 ng.hr/ml in the adult and adolescent groups; half-life was 16.0 +/- 0.7 and 13.4 +/- 1.4 hours, respectively. After nebulization, 14 of 19 subjects exhibited two concentration peaks (Cmax1 and Cmax2) with mean values of 1.57 +/- 1.67 ng/ml at 0.5 +/- 0.2 hours and 1.37 +/- 1.21 ng/ml at 4.0 +/- 1.0 hours for adults, and 1.49 +/- 0.99 ng/ml at 0.5 +/- 0.1 hours and 1.52 +/- 0.81 ng/ml at 3.3 +/- 0.5 hours for adolescents. Estimated mean +/- SD dose nebulized was 1.91 +/- 0.66 and 2.28 +/- 0.30 mg in the adult and adolescent groups, respectively. Mean +/- SD AUC from time zero to the last measurable plasma amiloride concentration after inhalation was 14.4 +/- 17.6 and 15.4 +/- 10.1 ng.hr/ml in the adults and adolescents. No significant adverse events occurred during the study. Pharmacokinetic parameters were not statistically different between the adolescent and adult groups by route of administration. However significant differences in peak amiloride concentration, AUC, and urinary amiloride excretion were evident when comparing oral versus inhalation administration within each group., Conclusions: Mean amiloride plasma concentration peaks and AUC after inhalation were significantly lower than after oral dosing. In addition, the second amiloride plasma concentration peak may be due to oral ingestion of the nebulized amiloride, whereas the earlier Cmax1 after inhalation may be due to pulmonary absorption of amiloride. These results suggest that single-dose amiloride inhalation in patients with mild to moderate CF results in minimal systemic exposure compared with oral dosing, and that drug disposition is similar in adolescents and adults with CF.

The group of drugs, so-called "potassium sparing diuretics" represent an important part of our modern therapeutic arsenal. Their "weak diuretic" properties are especially beneficial in cirrhotic patients with ascites, when highly effective loop diuretics may be hazardous. Potassium sparing diuretics have not only the advantage of avoiding potassium loss, but can potentiate the effects of diuretics acting in distal tubules and Henle's loop also. They may be combined by each other or ACE inhibitors too, taking the necessary precautions and laboratory monitoring. Their indications include the hypertension and special diseases as Conn's, Bartter's, Liddle syndromes and hirsutism. The broad clinical usefulness justifies the drug inventory ambition to develop new, more effective potassium sparing compounds without side effects. Authors overview their main clinicofarmacological properties, therapeutical indications alone or in combinations and their potential side effects.

Impaired mucociliary clearance contributes to the pathophysiology of several airways diseases including cystic fibrosis, asthma, and chronic bronchitis. Extracellular triphosphate nucleotides (adenosine 5'-triphosphate [ATP], uridine 5'-triphosphate [UTP]) activate several components of the mucociliary escalator, suggesting they may have potential as therapeutic agents for airways diseases. We conducted initial (Phase I) studies of acute safety and efficacy of aerosolized UTP alone and in combination with aerosolized amiloride, the sodium channel blocker, in normal human volunteers. Safety was assessed by measurement of pulmonary function. Neither UTP alone nor in combination with amiloride caused any clinically significant adverse effects on airway mechanics, (subdivisions of) lung volumes, or gas exchange. Acute efficacy of UTP and amiloride alone and in combination, was assessed by measuring changes in the clearance of inhaled radiolabeled particles. A 2.5-fold increase in mucociliary clearance was seen in response to UTP alone and in combination with amiloride. We conclude that aerosolized UTP +/- amiloride clearly enhances mucociliary clearance without acute adverse effects in normal adults, and may have therapeutic potential to enhance airways clearance in diseases characterized by retained airways secretions.

This study aims to describe factors associated with cognitive decline among 2584 subjects, aged 65-74, who were followed up for 54 months in the Medical Research Council Elderly Hypertension Trial (1982-1989). The subjects completed a cognitive test, the Paired Associate Learning Test (PALT), five times over this period. Decline on the PALT was associated with advanced age, male sex, rural residence, depression and low intelligence. These effects were modified by gender and level of pre-morbid intelligence. Advanced age, rural residence and number of cigarettes smoked daily were only associated with PALT decline among women of below median intelligence. The association between depression and PALT decline was only apparent in women of below median intelligence and men of above median intelligence. While these findings are consistent with other research into cognitive decline, they differ in some ways from reported risk factors for dementia, suggesting aetiological separateness. That women were more vulnerable than men to the effects of age and smoking raises the question of the impact on cognition of accelerated atherosclerosis after the menopause.

A 74-year-old woman developed acute renal failure and granulomatous interstitial nephritis associated with hydrochlorothiazide/amiloride. On stopping the drug the renal function improved, but not significantly. Around 20 months after prednisone administration, the renal function had stabilized, with a moderate degree of renal insufficiency. The case is discussed, and some aspects of acute interstitial nephritis induced by diuretics are briefly reviewed.

Objectives: Previous studies have reported beneficial antiarrhythmic effects when selected drugs were combined. The purpose of this study was to assess whether a favorable interaction would occur with amiloride and quinidine., Design: The antiarrhythmic and electrophysiologic effects of quinidine alone and in combination with amiloride were assessed in 10 patients with inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia. Parallel electrophysiologic studies assessed this drug combination in guinea pig papillary muscle., Results: None of the patients had adverse effects during quinidine monotherapy. However, seven of 10 patients had adverse responses to the combination treatment: three patients had suppression of inducible ventricular tachycardia during quinidine monotherapy but had sustained ventricular tachycardia induced during combination treatment; three other patients had somatic side effects that resulted in discontinuation of the combination therapy but were absent during quinidine monotherapy; and one patient had 12 episodes of sustained ventricular tachycardia during this combination therapy. The patient had no such response during monotherapy. Surface QRS duration was significantly more prolonged during combination therapy than during monotherapy. Parallel electrophysiologic effects assessed this drug combination in guinea pig papillary muscle. The combination of amiloride (1 mumol/L) and quinidine (10 mumol/L) synergistically decreased the maximum rate of rise of phase 0 of the action potential (Vmax) (43 +/- 12 V/sec) compared with quinidine alone (24 +/- 9 V/sec) because of a greater degree of tonic block of Vmax (14% +/- 6%) as compared to quinidine alone (3% +/- 3%) with no significant change in action potential duration., Conclusions: Amiloride exaggerates the effects of quinidine on QRS duration in patients and on Vmax during in vitro study, which implies that the proarrhythmic effect of the combination of amiloride and quinidine may be associated with synergistic increase in sodium channel blockade.

The pharmacological treatment, mainly based on diuretics, of isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) has recently been shown to reduce the risk of stroke and coronary heart disease in the elderly. The purpose of this study was to compare the antihypertensive effect and tolerability of different drug regimens in elderly subjects with ISH (systolic blood pressure--SBP-- > or = 160 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure--DBP-- < 90 mmHg). A multicentre, randomized, controlled open trial was planned in the general practice setting. Four widely used treatment schedules were tested: hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg plus amiloride 2.5 mg (H+Am), nifedipine slow release 20 mg (N), atenolol 50 mg (At) and atenolol 25 mg plus chlorthalidone 6.25 mg (At+C). After a baseline evaluation, 308 patients (76.3% female, mean age 75.3 +/- 7.1 years) were randomized and followed up for 6 months. After 3 months the drug dosage was doubled if the systolic blood pressure goal (SBP < 160 mmHg and SBP reduction of at least 20 mmHg) had not been reached. Ninety-four subjects (30.5%) presented contraindications to beta-blockers. At the 3rd- and 6th-month visits all treatment groups, except At, showed a significant reduction in SBP compared to the control group; DBP showed no significant reduction in any group at any time. At the end of the follow-up the percentage of hypertensives who had reached the BP goal was 14.6% in the control group, 52.9% in H+Am, 54.8% in N, 28.6% in At and 52.2% in At+C.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Twenty patients with essential hypertension aged 39-70 years, underwent 20 weeks (short-term) and 30 weeks (long-term) lipid and lipoprotein assessment following moduretic (combination of hydrochlorothiazide and amloride) therapy. Moduretic caused adverse alterations in plasma lipid and lipoprotein concentrations at 20 weeks, characterized by increases in total cholesterol (TC) (9-23%), low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) (18-42%), Triglycerides (TG) (12-26%) and LDL-C/HDL-C (36-92%), as well as decreases in high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) (-14 to -26%) and HDL-C/TC (-23 to -39%). For 12 patients who were continued on the same therapy for the longer period of 30 weeks, the adverse effects were less pronounced when compared with the short-term effects. The increases in TC (9.6%), in LDL-C (21%), and in LDL-C/HDL-C (48%), and the decreases in the mean HDL-C (-20%), and in HDL-C/TC (-25%), were all significant. In contrast, the slight increase in TG noted during the long-term moduretic therapy was not significant. Our data suggest that moduretic therapy induces altered lipid-lipoprotein patterns in hypertensive patients. However, the possible influence of baseline cholesterol concentration and the duration of therapy, may be important factors in the lipid response to moduretic therapy.

This study was performed to compare the effect of one month's treatment with hydrochlorothiazide (25 mg) in combination with either amiloride (2.5 mg) or triamterene (50 mg) on plasma sodium levels in elderly people in institutional care. Fifty residents of NHS nursing or social service residential care established on diuretics for congestive cardiac failure and aged 64 years or over were recruited. Forty-one patients were included in the final data analysis. Patients on hydrochlorothiazide/amiloride had a significantly lower plasma sodium (137 vs 139 mmol/l, 95% confidence interval for difference between medians 0-2 mmol/l) than those on hydrochlorthiazide/triamterene (P = 0.01). In equivalent potassium-retaining doses, amiloride is associated with significantly lower plasma sodium levels than triamterene, when given in combination with hydrochlorothiazide in elderly patients with congestive cardiac failure. This finding adds weight to uncontrolled observations implicating thiazide/amiloride diuretic combinations in causing serious hyponatraemia. This danger, although uncommon, should perhaps influence prescribing habits in an at-risk population.

The defective regulation of the secretory chloride channel and the accelerated rate of sodium absorption in the airway epithelia of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) contribute to the dehydration of airway secretions which is responsible for secondary damage in the respiratory tract. The sodium-blocker amiloride inhibits sodium absorption depending on the dosage of the drug. This effect is documented by means of measuring transepithelial potential difference which is decreased following to inhalative amiloride administration in CF patients. Clinical long term efficiency has been shown to be probable, but has to be confirmed. Investigation in this field is difficult, because there are some other important factors which influence viscosity of mucus. The use of amiloride can best be evaluated, if it is given immediately after birth. However, the answer to some important questions has to be found before.

1. The relative potencies of amiloride (5 and 20 mg) and spironolactone (25 and 100 mg) for plasma and erythrocyte electrolytes were investigated in a double-blind, randomised, balanced, crossover study in 12 normal men treated concomitantly with hydrochlorothiazide 100 mg daily for 1 week. 2. Participants satisfied an a priori requirement for a fall in plasma potassium concentration of at least 0.5 mmol l-1 after 7 days of treatment with hydrochlorothiazide alone. 3. After hydrochlorothiazide alone, plasma potassium and sodium concentrations fell (P < 0.001). There were associated reductions in erythrocyte sodium (P < 0.01). Plasma magnesium concentration did not change, although erythrocyte magnesium decreased (P < 0.001). 4. Both amiloride and spironolactone attenuated the thiazide-induced fall in plasma potassium (relative potency, amiloride:spironolactone 10:1, 95% confidence interval 6.3-16.2:1). Amiloride but not spironolactone was associated with a dose-related increase in plasma magnesium; a relative potency estimation was precluded. There was little evidence of influences of amiloride or spironolactone on erythrocyte electrolytes. 5. On a weight basis, amiloride is ten times more potent than spironolactone as a potassium-sparing agent in diuretic-treated subjects but neither agent had major effects on erythrocyte potassium. The drugs may have divergent actions on magnesium handling; hydrochlorothiazide alone had no influence on plasma magnesium.

We report the history of a diabetic man presenting with hyperkalaemia and rapidly progressing muscular paralysis with severe respiratory embarrassment. His symptoms resolved rapidly with reduction of the serum potassium concentration. Similar cases have been reported previously but this is a problem that few will have encountered and is a diagnosis which should not be overlooked before artificial ventilation is commenced.

Impaired salivary gland function can be a major cause of late morbidity following the treatment of head and neck cancer with radiotherapy. A large number of commonly prescribed medications can also reduce salivary gland function. We report three patients with already impaired salivary gland function following successful radiotherapy in whom additional prescribed medication led to an increased reduction in salivary flow, thus further impairing the quality of life of these patients. Stopping the medication resulted in subjective and objective improvement in salivary gland function.

Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors are frequently used in conjunction with diuretics in the treatment of congestive cardiac failure. We report two cases in which use of a proprietary combination diuretic containing a loop diuretic and potassium sparing agent with an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor was associated with hyperkalaemic cardiac arrest. Successful resuscitation from the arrest permitted elucidation of its mechanism. We believe that this outcome has not previously been reported, and emphasise the importance of electrolyte monitoring in patients receiving angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors particularly if prescribed in addition to fixed combination proprietary diuretics.