Search

Despite a lack of evidence of benefit, the compounded product ABH gel (lorazepam, diphenhydramine, and haloperidol) continues to be prescribed for individuals in hospice and palliative care settings for the treatment of nausea and vomiting and terminal delirium. More effective and reliable pharmacological and nonpharmacological strategies exist for the treatment of these conditions in the palliative care and hospice settings. We discuss the pharmacokinetic and clinical evidence for the individual components of ABH gel, as well as the compounded product, and attempt to understand the mechanism of effect that some purport to see, as well as why the compound continues to enjoy such a cult following. Truly, the continued use of ABH gel makes for a pricey placebo and delays the treatment of end-of-life symptoms with modalities that work.

National agencies have championed stewardship initiatives to enhance antimicrobial and opioid use in long-term care facilities. Health care providers for these residents have been given the task to ensure "the right drug is used for the right indication at the right time and duration." One potential challenge to this is incorrect or incomplete documentation of allergies. Many long-term care facilities have traditionally, and currently, used a "list format" of allergies in, or on, the resident's chart. This approach is incomplete as it rarely provides detailed information about the reaction to a particular drug. Senior care pharmacists and their students can play a role within long-term care facilities by helping ensure the optimal selection of drugs by providing a detailed allergy assessment that documents detailed reaction information, whenever possible.

Background Alzheimer's disease (AD) medications have been suggested to positively affect behavior, though not universally in all studies. Their impact on antipsychotic use is not well-defined. Methods This cross-sectional, retrospective study evaluated residents with AD on cholinesterase inhibitors, memantine, both, or neither throughout multiple long-term care facilities during July 2014. Patients were included if they: were between 65 and 89 years of age, had a diagnosis of AD, and had a cognitive assessment within three months of the study period. Patients residing in the facility for 100 days or fewer, or those having a Centers for MedicareMedicaid Services-approved diagnosis for antipsychotic use were excluded. The primary outcome was the prevalence of antipsychotic prescribing in patients receiving AD medications compared with those without AD therapy. The Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center institutional review board approved the study protocol. Results Of 1,282 patients screened, 285 (161 AD medications and 124 no-AD medications) were analyzed. Median cognitive status scores suggested severe cognitive impairment. Patients receiving AD medications had higher antipsychotic utilization compared with those without AD medications (27% vs. 19%, respectively; P = 0.08). Patients receiving combination AD medications had the highest antipsychotic use. No statistically significant differences were detected in cognitive status subgroups. Of interest is that a post-hoc analysis found a statistically significant association with greater antipsychotic use and increasing number of AD medications. Conclusion Long-term care facility residents with AD receiving AD medications had higher rates of antipsychotic use compared with those not receiving AD treatment. The link between antipsychotic use and the number of AD medications may point to overprescribing in dementia with behavioral disturbances as a potential contributing factor.

Type 3 diabetes mellitus has been coined to describe an alternative pathologic pathway of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The insulin resistance and impaired insulin signaling seen on positron-emission tomography scans in the brain of those affected by AD support this disease hypothesis. Two products-the medical food caprylidene (Axona) and coconut oil-seek to target the underlying pathology of type 3 diabetes mellitus by providing an alternative fuel source in the brain. Rather than improving glucose utilization, these two products seek to supply ketone bodies in sufficient quantities to pass through the blood-brain barrier and provide an alternative energy source to glucose. This review will provide an overview of the research behind these two modalities, as well as information necessary to ensure the safe use of these supplements.

Introduction Neuropsychiatric disorders affect millions of older adults. Despite this, there are relatively few older adults included in clinical trials evaluating treatments for psychiatric disorders. Citalopram has been evaluated in older adults with neuropsychiatric disorders and has largely been found beneficial, making the 2011 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) safety advisory on citalopram extremely impactful. Methods A literature search was completed using the PubMed database. Results were limited to clinical trials conducted in older adults that were published in English. Results Review of the literature confirms the efficacy of citalopram in depression, anxiety, depression associated with Parkinson disease, and behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia. Additionally, no adverse cardiac outcomes have been described related to citalopram. Discussion The FDA's evidence for applying this safety advisory to citalopram is minimal and largely based on surrogate markers, such as the QTc interval rather than clinical and safety outcomes. Citalopram is known to increase the QTc, but this increase has not been linked to adverse cardiac outcomes. The evidence for efficacy and against adverse outcomes suggests that a reevaluation of the dosing restrictions in older adults with neuropsychiatric disorders is needed.

Consultant pharmacists improve the lives of older adults by providing medication management, avoiding adverse drug reactions, and uncovering duplicative therapy. Despite this, there is a lack of legislation supporting the role of the consultant pharmacist in many of the settings-other than nursing facilities-where seniors reside. Specifically, federal and state laws do not recognize consultant pharmacists for their specialized role in pharmacotherapy and the potential benefits they bring to older adults in assisted living facilities. Among many services, consultant pharmacists may provide monthly medication reviews, staff medication education, and medication system management in assisted living facilities. A literature search was conducted to identify literature supporting the benefits of consultant pharmacists in assisted living facilities. Gaps in available literature are discussed as are ideas for expanding the role of consultant pharmacists in assisted living facilities.

The mandate of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to decrease the use of antipsychotics in long-term care facilities requires creative solutions. Low-dose quetiapine is used for a multitude of behavioral disorders and sleep problems in the nursing facility population. Yet, at doses of 25 mg per day or less, it doesn't have strong affinity (if any) for the dopamine-2 (D2) receptor, but it does maintain affinity for the histamine-1 and alpha-1 receptors. This begs the question: If it's not antagonizing the D2 receptor, could the use of something with similar receptor-affinity produce the same result, allowing discontinuation of the antipsychotic altogether? Using knowledge of receptor affinities and the pharmacologic action of low-dose quetiapine, consultant pharmacists may have one additional tool in their armamentarium of fighting inappropriate antipsychotic use.

Individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and their caregivers are using supplements in an effort to halt the progression of the disease. Individuals at risk for or fearing Alzheimer's may use these supplements to try to prevent the disease. Senior care pharmacists are accessible and uniquely qualified to answer questions, make recommendations, and attempt to make drug therapy safe and effective for these individuals. With this in mind, it is important to know the data supporting (or not supporting) common supplements marketed toward those with AD. A review of efficacy and safety data, drug interactions, as well as the mechanism of action believed to benefit those with AD of three common supplements (Prevagen, Cerefolin NAC, and the omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid DHA), are highlighted.

Objective To describe the development and pilot study of the Practice Site Readiness for Interprofessional Education (PRIPE) instrument. Methods The 30-item PRIPE instrument was developed to assess the structural and procedural readiness of experiential pharmacy practice sites for interprofessional education (IPE) using the Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC) core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice (IPCP) as a main source of inspiration. A pilot study of PRIPE was conducted via investigator-led, structured interviews of geriatric and pediatric experiential preceptors. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the results. Results Twenty interviews were completed, yielding a response rate of 51.3%. There was an equal distribution of geriatric and pediatric preceptors; 55% were faculty and 45% were adjunct. All practice sites were found to train other health care professional students (nursing 95%; medical 55%; social work 35%; physical therapy 25%; occupational therapy, physician assistant, and psychology 20%; dentistry 15%; and public health 0%). Journal clubs and topic discussions emerged as opportunities to expand IPE. Over 50% of preceptors reported frequently meeting the IPEC core competencies related to communication (listen, exchange ideas, and use respectful language), teamwork (use complimentary abilities, build relationships, and share accountability and patient-centered problem-solving), and roles/responsibilities (clarify responsibilities). Of the preceptors, 80% of them reported that their practice met the definition of interprofessionality. Conclusions PRIPE is a useful instrument to identify potential IPE collaborators and collaboration-friendly IPE activities at experiential practice sites as well as to assess the frequency with which critical IPEC core competencies are being met. The authors envision academic and practice site administrators utilizing PRIPE as a quality control measure.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate if patients of nonwhite race are less likely to receive insulin therapy for treatment of poorly controlled diabetes than patients of white race. Methods A retrospective review was performed of patients with an A1C >10%. The primary objective was to determine any difference in the initiation of insulin between white and nonwhite patients. Secondary outcomes measured the impact of clinic type and provider specialty on the initiation of insulin therapy. Exclusion criteria included those patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus, those who were previously receiving insulin, and those without an outpatient clinic visit within 14 days of an A1C >10%. Results A total of 277 patients were included. Of these patients, 132 (47.7%) were white, followed by 95 (34.2%) black non-Hispanic patients and 30 (10.8%) Hispanic/Latino patients. No difference was found in receipt of insulin therapy for nonwhite patients as compared to white patients (12.5 vs 21.4, P = .117). Neither clinic type nor provider specialty impacted initiation of insulin therapy. No changes to medication regimen were made at 35% of clinic visits. Conclusions Failure to intensify diabetic medications was common in this outpatient setting. There were no disparities in the receipt of insulin therapy between white and nonwhite patients.

Limited data exist on the use of bisphosphonates in patients with poor kidney function due to a contraindication derived from inadequate experience among patients with kidney failure, accounting for as much as 25% of nonprescribing when otherwise appropriate.To determine whether bisphosphonate use in patients with decreased renal function, as outlined in the package insert (estimated creatinine clearance [eCrCl]35 mL/min), would result in higher rates of hypocalcemia, as suggested in previous studies.This was a retrospective cohort study of elderly veterans 65 years of age and older at the Veterans Affairs North Texas Health Care System in Dallas, Texas. We identified 3089 patients who started oral bisphosphonate therapy between August 1, 2003 and July 12, 2010. Of the 252 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 25 and 227 patients had an eCrCl35 mL/min and eCrCl ≥35 mL/min, respectively. Analyses of changes in serum calcium from baseline to the 1-year study end point were performed within and between each renal function group.Among the veterans with an eCrCl35 mL/min and eCrCl ≥35 mL/min, there were decreases in median serum calcium levels from baseline to study end point from 9.8 mg/dL (interquartile range [IQR], 9.4-10.2 mg/dL) to 9.3 mg/dL (IQR, 9.0-10.0 mg/dL; P = 0.028) and 9.6 mg/dL (IQR, 9.3-9.9 mg/dL) to 9.4 mg/dL (IQR, 9.1-9.8 mg/dL; P0.001), respectively. However, there was no difference in Δcalcium: -0.2 mg/dL (IQR, 0-0.6 mg/dL) and 0.2 mg/dL (IQR, -0.2 to 0.5 mg/dL; P = 0.547), respectively.This exploratory assessment may suggest that, in elderly veterans, the initiation of oral bisphosphonate therapy contributed to a statistically significant decrease in serum calcium levels regardless of baseline renal function; however, the clinical impact of this change does not appear to be significant. Future studies should assess serum calcium in a larger population of patients to confirm the safety of oral bisphosphonates in poor kidney function.

HIV infections are a growing concern in the elderly as a result of improvements in therapeutics and monitoring, which have extended the life span for this HIV-infected population. Elderly patients potentially are more complicated to treat than younger HIV-infected individuals because of comorbidities and the physiological effects of aging on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. The patient, a 67-year-old African-American HIV-infected male, presents to the transitional care unit of university-affiliated hospital refusing to take medications and undergo laboratory testing, including blood draws. This patient's treatment is further complicated by poor renal function, medications with potential interactions, and a recent diagnosis of depression. This case demonstrates treatment and monitoring of an elderly patient with HIV and reveals the complications associated with this disease state. Specifically, it identifies nonadherence to medications and a lack of laboratory results, which affect the efficacy of treatment and monitoring, medication adjustments based on metabolism and renal excretion, monitoring of adverse effects of HIV and antiretroviral therapy, and comorbid conditions that may be linked to HIV and antiretroviral therapy such as depression and bone disease. Education on HIV medications, monitoring, and standards of care for pharmacists working with the geriatric population is warranted and should be emphasized as the HIV-infected elderly population continues to grow.

Eric J MacLaughlin1, David S Fike1, Carlos A Alvarez2, Charles F Seifert3, Amie T Blaszczyk2Texas Tech University Health Sciences School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Practice, 1Amarillo, 2Dallas, 3Lubbock, Texas, USAPurpose: Formal presentations are a common requirement for students in health professional programs, and evaluations are often viewed as subjective. To date, literature describing the reliability or validity of seminar grading rubrics is lacking. The objectives of this study were to characterize inter-rater agreement and internal consistency of a grading rubric used in a grand rounds seminar course.Methods: Retrospective study of 252 student presentations given from fall 2007 to fall 2008. Data including student and faculty demographics, overall content score, overall communication scores, subcomponents of content and communication, and total presentation scores were collected. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS, 16.0.Results: The rubric demonstrated internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.826). Mean grade difference between faculty graders was 4.54 percentage points (SD = 3.614), with ≤ 10-point difference for 92.5% of faculty evaluations. Student self evaluations correlated with faculty scores for content, communication, and overall presentation (r = 0.513, r = 0.455, and r = 0.539; P < 0.001 for all respectively). When comparing mean faculty scores to student’s self-evaluations between quintiles, students with lower faculty evaluations overestimated their performance, and those with high faculty evaluations underestimated their performance (P < 0.001).Conclusion: The seminar evaluation rubric demonstrated inter-rater agreement and internal consistency. Keywords: seminar, public speaking, evaluation, grand rounds

Objective. To assess whether the Jellybean Polypharmacy Simulation Exercise (JPSE) improved empathy in pharmacy students. Methods. The JPSE was given to all third-professional year pharmacy students in a required Special Populations course with pre- and post-scores on the Kiersma-Chen Empathy Scale (KCES) assessed, and open-ended questions on lessons learned from the exercise. Results. Pharmacy students showed a statistically significant increase in KCES scores after completing the JPSE. Open-ended question responses reflected personal growth and appreciation for patients managing difficult medication regimens. Conclusion. This polypharmacy simulation showed the ability to increase empathy in pharmacy students, as well as mimic a realistic experience in managing a multi-drug, multi-dose medication regimen.

Alzheimer's dementia (AD) is the most common type of dementia. In addition to the cognitive and functional disturbances that happen as the disease progresses, other psychological disturbances may manifest. Depression, insomnia, anxiety, and psychosis are among several psychological conditions which can occur concomitantly with AD. These changes can result in decreased quality of life for both patients and caregivers, increase caregiver burden, and impact the decision to place a patient with AD into a long-term care facility. An evidence-based review of the literature was performed to ascertain if a specific recommendation for pharmacotherapy can be made based on current research in this specific patient population.

Few studies have evaluated the effect of vancomycin dosing on the health outcomes in geriatric patients. Data are needed to determine whether higher vancomycin dosing strategies are more effective in geriatric patients and/or lead to excessive rates of adverse events.This study used a subset of patients aged ≥65 years from a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteraemia. Patients received ≥ 48 h of empiric vancomycin between 1 July 2002 and 30 June 2008. We compared the incidence of nephrotoxicity and in-hospital mortality in patients who received guideline-recommended dosing (at least 15 mg/kg/dose) to patients who received lower dosing. Multivariable generalized mixed-effect models were constructed to determine independent risk factors for nephrotoxicity and in-hospital mortality.Half of the cohort (46% of 92 patients) received guideline-recommended dosing. Empiric use of weight-based dosing did increase the percentage of patients achieving a vancomycin trough ≥ 15 mg/L (57% vs. 42%). Nephrotoxicity occurred in 32% of patients and 26% died during their hospitalization. Guideline-recommended dosing was not associated with significant changes in nephrotoxicity (OR 1·13; 95% CI 0·40-3·19) or in-hospital mortality (OR 1·14; 95% CI 0·41-3·18) in the multivariable analysis.In this study of geriatric patients, guideline-recommended dosing was not associated with significant changes in nephrotoxicity or mortality. As 40% of the patients who received guideline-recommended dosing failed to achieve a target vancomycin trough of ≥ 15 mg/L, future studies should focus on dosing strategies to increase target attainment rate.

Bisphosphonates are efficacious for a variety of antiosteoporotic endpoints, most notably for vertebral, nonvertebral, and hip outcomes, including fractures. Currently the prevalence of osteoporosis in patients undergoing dialysis ranges from 13% to 80%. There are very limited data on the use of bisphosphonates within this population. This review discusses the available literature regarding bisphosphonates and dialysis. Contraindication to bisphosphonates, which are cleared renally, can be justifiable based on the pharmacokinetics. However, the medication and dialysis factors that should be considered if bisphosphonates are used in these patients include the amount of drug removed per dialysis session, the molecular weight, the percent protein-bound, sieving coefficient, dialysis membrane, blood-flow rates, and dialysis-flow rates.In addition, much data on bisphosphonates and dialysis are derived from nonosteoporosis studies. Furthermore, a large portion of patients requiring dialysis are at risk for osteoporosis and subsequent fractures, and may benefit from use of bisphosphonates. However, with a dearth of knowledge, more data are needed prior to making this a routine recommendation.

A rising concern among clinicians is treatment of unplanned weight loss in the elderly, especially given the predicted growth of this population over the next few decades. Unexpected weight loss in the geriatric patient worsens overall health outcomes. A variety of pharmacotherapeutic options are available for treatment; however, evidence underlying their use is limited, and none has gained approval from the United States Food and Drug Administration for this indication. At present, no guidelines support the choice of one agent over another. Although several drug interventions have been employed for this problem, megestrol acetate and mirtazapine are becoming increasingly used for appetite stimulation. These drugs represent two feasible options for geriatric patients because of their generally favorable adverse-effect profiles and few drug interactions, but they are often misused. In a comprehensive search of the MEDLINE and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts databases, we identified all published reports on the use of megestrol acetate or mirtazapine for the treatment of weight loss and on any adverse events associated with these drugs. Special emphasis was placed on trials performed in an elderly population. Results were conflicting, most likely because of differing study designs and small numbers of patients. Megestrol acetate and mirtazapine appear to be effective for appetite stimulation and weight gain in some settings. However, applicability of the data to elderly individuals is unclear, and adverse events reported in a few of the trials and in case reports were not benign. Therefore, the use of megestrol acetate or mirtazapine for weight loss should be thoroughly evaluated on an individual basis. Pharmacotherapy should be used only after all underlying causes of weight loss are assessed and treated.

OBJECTIVE: To report on a patient with Lewy body dementia who developed worsening of hallucinations with memantine withdrawal and significant improvement with reinitiation of the drug. CASE SUMMARY: A 78-year-old man presented to a geriatric psychiatry clinic in March 2011. The patient had experienced gradual memory loss since 2007 and was diagnosed with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) in 2009. His medication regimen included donepezil and memantine; his cognitive and functional status appeared stable. Occasional mild visual hallucinations occurred but were not concerning to the patient or his wife. The patient did well to July 2011, when memantine became restricted within the health care institution; memantine was therefore tapered to discontinuation. From July to September 2011, the patient's cognition and function appeared to decline significantly. He also began experiencing severe visual hallucinations daily. Memantine was reinitiated in September 2011 and, within days, the patient was free of hallucinations. By November 2011, his cognition and function were noted to have improved to previous status, and hallucinations were rare. DISCUSSION: Three small randomized studies and 4 case reports were found addressing the use of memantine for DLB. Both improvement and worsening of hallucinations were noted with memantine use in the case reports, but the studies showed only a small benefit in cognition. However, cognitive and psychiatric symptoms worsened when memantine was discontinued. One study found that Neuropsychiatric-Inventory scores and hallucination scores improved significantly for patients taking memantine. CONCLUSIONS: The literature investigating the use of memantine for the psychiatric symptoms of DLB is limited but there are data noting results similar to what we observed in our patient when his memantine was discontinued and reinitiated.