1. Smartphone motor testing to distinguish idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder, controls, and PD
- Author
-
Richard Wade-Martins, Claudio Ruffmann, Fahd Baig, Tim Quinnell, Andong Zhan, Michele T.M. Hu, Michael A Lawton, Christine Lo, Michal Rolinski, Jane Rumbold, Thomas R Barber, Yoav Ben-Shlomo, Graham Lennox, Siddharth Arora, Amandine Louvel, Zenobia Zaiwalla, Johannes C. Klein, Gary Dennis, and Max A. Little
- Subjects
Male ,0301 basic medicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,REM Sleep Behavior Disorder ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,REM sleep behavior disorder ,Article ,Fingers ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Physical medicine and rehabilitation ,Rating scale ,Tremor ,Reaction Time ,medicine ,Postural Balance ,Humans ,Gait ,Aged ,Balance (ability) ,Sleep disorder ,business.industry ,Reproducibility of Results ,Parkinson Disease ,Postural tremor ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,030104 developmental biology ,Finger tapping ,Voice ,Female ,Smartphone ,Neurology (clinical) ,business ,Psychomotor Performance ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
ObjectiveWe sought to identify motor features that would allow the delineation of individuals with sleep study-confirmed idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) from controls and Parkinson disease (PD) using a customized smartphone application.MethodsA total of 334 PD, 104 iRBD, and 84 control participants performed 7 tasks to evaluate voice, balance, gait, finger tapping, reaction time, rest tremor, and postural tremor. Smartphone recordings were collected both in clinic and at home under noncontrolled conditions over several days. All participants underwent detailed parallel in-clinic assessments. Using only the smartphone sensor recordings, we sought to (1) discriminate whether the participant had iRBD or PD and (2) identify which of the above 7 motor tasks were most salient in distinguishing groups.ResultsStatistically significant differences based on these 7 tasks were observed between the 3 groups. For the 3 pairwise discriminatory comparisons, (1) controls vs iRBD, (2) controls vs PD, and (3) iRBD vs PD, the mean sensitivity and specificity values ranged from 84.6% to 91.9%. Postural tremor, rest tremor, and voice were the most discriminatory tasks overall, whereas the reaction time was least discriminatory.ConclusionsProdromal forms of PD include the sleep disorder iRBD, where subtle motor impairment can be detected using clinician-based rating scales (e.g., Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale), which may lack the sensitivity to detect and track granular change. Consumer grade smartphones can be used to accurately separate not only iRBD from controls but also iRBD from PD participants, providing a growing consensus for the utility of digital biomarkers in early and prodromal PD.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF