Search

Population genomic screening has been demonstrated to detect at-risk individuals who would not be clinically identified otherwise. However, there are concerns about the increased utilization of unnecessary services and the associated increase in costs. The objectives of this study are twofold: (1) determine whether there is a difference in healthcare utilization and costs following disclosure of a pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) BRCA1/2 variant via a genomic screening program, and (2) measure the post-disclosure uptake of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline-recommended risk management. We retrospectively reviewed electronic health record (EHR) and billing data from a female population of BRCA1/2 P/LP variant carriers without a personal history of breast or ovarian cancer enrolled in Geisinger’s MyCode genomic screening program with at least a one-year post-disclosure observation period. We identified 59 women for the study cohort out of 50,726 MyCode participants. We found no statistically significant differences in inpatient and outpatient utilization and average total costs between one-year pre- and one-year post-disclosure periods ($18,821 vs. $19,359, p = 0.76). During the first year post-disclosure, 49.2% of women had a genetic counseling visit, 45.8% had a mammography and 32.2% had an MRI. The uptake of mastectomy and oophorectomy was 3.5% and 11.8%, respectively, and 5% of patients received chemoprevention.

The MyCode Community Health Initiative (MyCode) is returning actionable results from whole exome sequencing. Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an inherited condition characterized by premature cardiovascular disease.We used multiple methods to assess care in 28 MyCode participants who received FH results. Chart reviews were conducted on 23 individuals in the sample and 7 individuals participated semistructured interviews.Chart reviews for 23 individuals with a Geisinger primary care provider found that 4 individuals (17% of 23) were at LDL-C (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) goal (of either LDL-C100 mg/dL for primary prevention and LDL-C70 mg/dL for secondary prevention) and 17 individuals (74% of 23) were prescribed lipid-lowering therapy before genetic result disclosure. After disclosure of the genetic test result, 5 individuals (22% of 23) met their LDL-C goal and 18 individuals (78% of 23) were prescribed lipid-lowering therapy. Follow-up care about this result was not documented for 4 individuals (17% of 23). Changes to intensity of medication management were made for 8 individuals (47% of 17 individuals previously prescribed lipid-lowering therapy). Interviewed individuals (n=7) were not surprised by their result as all knew they had high cholesterol; however, individuals did not seem to discern FH as a separate condition from their high cholesterol.Among individuals receiving genetic diagnosis of FH,25% had no changes to lipid-lowering therapy, despite not being at LDL-C goal and learning their high cholesterol is related to a genetic condition requiring more aggressive treatment. Individuals and clinicians may have an inadequate understanding of FH as a distinct condition requiring enhanced medical management.