Search

To assess whether preoperative tracheostomy (PreOT) increases risk of complications after total laryngectomy (TL) and to determine if timing of tracheostomy creation is associated with an increased risk.Retrospective cohort study.Tertiary care hospital between 2007 and 2020.Inclusion criteria were patients who underwent primary or salvage TL for oncologic treatment. Dependent variables of interest included surgical complications, such as wound dehiscence, infection, hematoma, complete flap failure, fistula formation, and stoma stenosis, as well as medical complications. Categorical variables were compared with chi-square test or Fisher exact test, and continuous variables were compared with an independentA total of 306 patients were included. Primary TL was performed in 161 (53%) patients and salvage in 145 (47%) patients. Of the patients undergoing primary laryngectomy, 105 (65%) received a PreOT. Of the patients undergoing salvage laryngectomy, 86 (59%) received a PreOT. In both primary and salvage cases, there was no association between PreOT and surgical or medical complications. Additionally, there was no significant association between timing of tracheostomy and surgical complications. On multivariable analysis, the presence of a PreOT was not associated with surgical complications. In salvage cases, those with a PreOT had a significantly longer average length of stay than those without a PreOT (12 vs 9 days,PreOT in patients undergoing primary and salvage laryngectomies was not associated with surgical or medical complications postlaryngectomy. Timing of tracheostomy in relation to laryngectomy was not found to adversely affect clinical outcomes.

Patients with recurrent oropharyngeal cancer can achieve survival benefits from surgical salvage, and often require simultaneous free-flap reconstruction. Resection and reconstruction can impact function, leading to tube dependence.describe rates of tracheostomy and gastrostomy tube dependence after oropharyngeal resection and free flap after prior radiation.evaluate patient, tumor, and treatment factors associated with tube dependence.Retrospective, multi-institutional cohort study. Patients treated from 2003 to 2020. Average follow-up 21.4 months.Five tertiary care centers.Consecutive cohort of patients undergoing resection and simultaneous free-flap reconstruction for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma after head and neck radiation.gastrostomy tube dependence and tracheostomy or tracheostoma 1 year after surgery. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression were performed to identify factors associated with dependence.89 patients underwent oropharyngectomy and free-flap reconstruction; 18 (20%) underwent total laryngectomy as part of tumor extirpation. After surgery, 51 patients (57%) lived 12 months. Among patients alive at 12 months, 22 (43%) were at least partially-dependent on gastrostomy tube, and 15 (29%) had either tracheostomy or tracheostoma. On multivariable analysis, extensive glossectomy (OR 16.6, 95% CI 1.83-389, p = 0.026) and total laryngectomy (OR 11.2, 95% CI 1.71-105, p = 0.018) were associated with long-term gastrostomy tube. No factors were associated with long-term tracheostomy on multivariable analysis.Even among long-term survivors after salvage resection and free-flap reconstruction, rates of tube dependence are significant. This multi-institutional review is the largest such study to the date and may help inform shared decision-making.IV Laryngoscope, 2022.

To define rates of occult metastases in salvage oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer resection requiring free flap, to examine the location of occult metastases, and to determine associations between occult metastasis and survival.Retrospective cohort study.Two tertiary care referral centers.We identified previous cases of irradiation with recurrent or second primary oral cavity or oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma that had no evidence of regional metastasis and required free tissue transfer reconstruction of the primary site. Patients who underwent elective neck dissection or exploration were reviewed. The main outcome measures were the presence and location of occult nodal metastasis. Disease-free survival and overall survival were measured. Odds ratios and hazard ratios were used for analysis.A total of 83 patients were included: 52 with oral cavity primary tumors and 31 with oropharynx. An overall 78 (94%) underwent elective salvage neck dissection. Occult metastases were found in 9 (11.5%) patients. The most common nodal station for occult metastasis was level 2. Neither elective neck dissection nor the presence of occult metastasis was significantly associated with regional disease-free or overall survival. Oropharyngeal primary tumors were associated with higher risk of occult metastasis (odds ratio, 1.38;There is a low incidence of occult metastasis in postradiated recurrent or second primary oral cavity and oropharyngeal tumors. Elective neck dissection and occult nodal metastases were not associated with regional or overall survival. This series may help surgeons make decisions regarding the extent of neck surgery after prior radiation, especially when free flap reconstruction is required.