Search

To assess time to, cumulative incidence of, and functional benefit of achieving sustained ≥2-step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) improvement in diabetic macular oedema (DMO).Post hoc analysis of VISTA/VIVID including eyes with DMO treated with intravitreal aflibercept injections (IAI), 2 mg q4 weeks (2q4, n = 250) or q8 weeks after 5 monthly doses (2q8, n = 249), or laser control (n = 249). Changes from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfield thickness (CST) were evaluated in sustained (≥2 consecutive visits) DRSS subgroups (≥1-step worsening, no change, ≥2-step improvement).Time to sustained ≥2-step DRSS improvement was shorter for both the IAI 2q4 and IAI 2q8 groups versus laser (both log-rank p 0.001). Cumulative incidences of sustained ≥2-step DRSS improvement with IAI 2q4 and IAI 2q8 versus laser were 40.0% and 42.8% versus 15.5% (both p 0.001) through week 100. Mean differences (95% CI) in BCVA gains from baseline at weeks 52 and 100 between eyes with sustained ≥2-step DRSS improvement versus sustained ≥1-step DRSS worsening were -3.0 (-8.9, 2.9) and 6.2 (0.2, 12.2) letters with laser, and 4.2 (0.8, 7.6) and 4.9 (1.3, 8.4) letters with IAI combined, respectively. Difference (95% CI) in CST reduction was significantly greater only with IAI combined at week 100 (-83.0 [-140.8, -25.3]). Correlations between BCVA and CST changes were weak.DMO eyes treated with IAI achieved sustained ≥2-step DRSS improvement significantly earlier and more frequently versus laser. This improvement was associated with greater BCVA gains, independent of CST reductions.ClinicalTrials.gov ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ ) identifiers: NCT01363440 and NCT01331681 .

To evaluate outcomes and disease characteristics in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration that received intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) and ranibizumab every 12 weeks or longer (≥q12 weeks) or less than every 12 weeks (q12 weeks) during year 2 of VIEW studies.Post hoc analysis of randomized clinical trial data.In year 1, eyes received ranibizumab q4 weeks (Rq4), IAI 2 mg q4 weeks (2q4), or IAI 2 mg q8 weeks after 3 monthly injections (2q8). In year 2, eyes received pro re nata treatment, with mandatory treatment at least q12 weeks.At week 96, 218 (42.5%), 284 (53.9%), and 245 (47.9%) eyes treated with Rq4, 2q4, and 2q8, respectively, received treatment at ≥q12-week intervals and 295 (57.5%), 243 (46.1%), and 266 (52.1%) eyes at12q-week intervals during the second year. Baseline occult-type choroidal neovascularization (CNV) (P = .0156) and retinal fluid (P.0001) and leakage (P.0001) at week 52 were associated withq12-week dosing. Mean best-corrected visual acuity gains from baseline with Rq4, 2q4, and 2q8 at ≥q12-week interval were 8.7, 9.9, and 9.7 letters at week 52 and 8.5, 8.8, and 9.2 letters at week 96, respectively. The corresponding gains withq12-week dosing were 10.3, 9.7, and 8.9 letters at week 52 and 9.1, 7.7, and 8.1 letters at week 96.Baseline CNV type other than occult and absence of retinal fluid and leakage at week 52 were significantly associated with ≥q12-week dosing. Vision improvements at week 52 following a year of fixed dosing with ranibizumab and IAI were maintained at week 96 in eyes that received treatment ≥q12 weeks andq12 weeks.

Purpose To describe longitudinal retinal fluid dynamics on spectral domain OCT and to identify imaging biomarkers that predict the worsening of DME with interval extension during anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy. Design A post hoc sub-analysis of phase III, VISTA-DME study. Methods Eyes received either intravitreal aflibercept injection 2 mg every 4 weeks (2q4) or every 8 weeks after 5 initial monthly injections (2q8), and eyes imaged with the Cirrus HD-OCT system were included. The macular cube was analyzed for 10 time-points from baseline through week 100. Retinal OCT images were evaluated using a novel software platform to extract retinal fluid features for calculation of volumetric fluid parameters, including the retinal fluid index (RFI): the percentage of retinal volume that was occupied by intraretinal fluid. Results Fifty-five eyes were included in the 2q4 group, and 58 eyes were included in the 2q8 group. Early RFI volatility with a central macular RFI increase by ≥5 points from week 4 to 8 (P = .004, odds ratio [OR] 31.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.0 to 329) and cumulative RFI volatility with an aggregate increase in macular RFI by ≥10 points from those timepoints with increased RFI between baseline to week 20, P = .005, OR 10.2, 95% CI 2.1 to 51.3) were both significant predictors for the worsening of DME and visual acuity when the treatment interval was extended to 8 weeks in the 2q8 group. Conclusions Early fluid dynamics as measured by (1) early RFI volatility and (2) cumulative RFI instability with aggregate increased RFI were associated with intolerance of interval extension.

Purpose To determine whether wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) treatment outcomes within prespecified patient subgroups were consistent with overall study results. Additionally, this subanalysis investigated whether there were any relationships between baseline characteristics and evaluated treatment outcomes. Design Post hoc subanalysis of The VEGF Trap-Eye: Investigation of Efficacy and Safety in Wet AMD (VIEW) 1 and 2, 2 similarly designed prospective, multicenter, double-masked, active-controlled, parallel-group, randomized clinical trials. Participants Two thousand four hundred twelve patients with an active subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) lesion of any subtype secondary to AMD. Methods Primary and key secondary visual end points at week 52 were examined to explore the consistency of effect among prespecified subgroups of 5 baseline characteristics: age, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), lesion type, lesion size, and central retinal thickness (CRT). Additionally, within-group analyses were conducted to determine whether the mean changes in BCVA and CRT at 52 weeks were associated positively or negatively with the baseline characteristics of interest. Main Outcome Measures Consistency of treatment outcomes among prespecified subgroups of baseline characteristics. Results For each baseline characteristic, tests for interaction within each prespecified subgroup and among the subgroups were not significant, suggesting that relative visual outcomes for each treatment arm were consistent with overall study outcomes. Within-group analysis revealed a significant association between baseline age, BCVA, and lesion size with BCVA outcomes at 52 weeks; namely, older age, greater BCVA, and larger lesion size were associated with lower mean BCVA gains at 52 weeks. Conclusions Patients in all subgroups of baseline age, BCVA, lesion type, lesion size, and CRT experienced visual outcomes consistent with those of the overall study population. Additionally, baseline older age, better BCVA, and larger CNV lesion size were found to be associated independently with lower mean BCVA gains after 52 weeks of anti–vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. The influence of baseline age, BCVA, and CNV lesion size on treatment outcomes is consistent with other reports from large, prospective trials in wet AMD.

Purpose To evaluate whether select baseline systemic and ocular factors influence ≥2-step improvement in the Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) score at week 100 in VISTA and VIVID. Design Post hoc analysis of 2 similarly designed phase 3 trials, VISTA and VIVID. Participants Total of 456 patients with center-involved diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods VISTA and VIVID randomized 872 DME patients to receive intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) 2 mg every 4 weeks (2q4), IAI 2 mg every 8 weeks after 5 monthly doses (2q8), or macular laser photocoagulation. This post hoc analysis evaluated the influence of select baseline factors on ≥2-step DRSS score improvement by logistic regression in an integrated VISTA and VIVID dataset using observed cases (n = 456) with patients in each treatment group divided into tertiles based on each characteristic. Main Outcome Measures Proportion of patients with ≥2-step improvement in DRSS score from baseline at week 100 by age, duration of diabetes, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), body mass index (BMI), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), and DRSS score. Results At week 100, 10.1%, 34.3%, and 37.6% of patients in the laser, 2q4, and 2q8 groups experienced a ≥2-step DRSS score improvement, respectively. Age, duration of diabetes, HbA1c, BMI, BCVA, and CST had no impact on the ability to achieve ≥2-step improvement in DRSS score. Initial DRSS score was the only factor significantly associated with ≥2-step DRSS score improvement in all treatment groups at weeks 24, 52, 76, and 100. Relatively higher proportions of IAI-treated patients with worse BCVA or thicker CST experienced ≥2-step DRSS score improvement compared with those with better BCVA or thinner CST, respectively, but these associations were not statistically significant. Conclusion A strong association was present between baseline DRSS score and ≥2-step DRSS score improvement at week 100 for DME patients in VISTA and VIVID.

IMPORTANCE: Proactive treatment of nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) reduces the risk of progression to vision-threatening complications. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate vascular endothelial growth factor blockade therapy with intravitreal aflibercept injections in eyes with severe NPDR without diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Aflibercept for the Improvement of Moderately Severe to Severe Nonproliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PANORAMA) was a double-masked 100-week randomized clinical trial conducted in multiple centers worldwide. The study included 402 adults with Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) level 47 or 53 with no DME and best-corrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better. INTERVENTIONS: Intravitreal injections of aflibercept, 2 mg, every 16 weeks after 3 initial monthly doses and one 8-week interval (aflibercept 2q16 group); intravitreal injections of aflibercept, 2 mg, every 8 weeks after 5 initial monthly doses, with pro re nata (PRN) dosing beginning at week 56 (aflibercept 2q8/PRN group); or sham injections (control group). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Proportions of eyes with a 2-step or greater improvement in DRSS level, vision-threatening complications, and center-involved DME from baseline to weeks 24, 52, and 100. RESULTS: Among 402 participants (1 eye per participant), the mean (SD) age was 55.7 (10.5) years; 225 (56.0%) were male, and 310 (77.1%) were White. A total of 135 were randomized to the aflibercept 2q16 group, 134 to the aflibercept 2q8/PRN group, and 133 to the control group. At 24 weeks, treatment with aflibercept resulted in a 2-step or greater improvement in DRSS level in 157 of 269 eyes (58.4%) in the combined aflibercept groups vs 8 of 133 eyes (6.0%) in the control group (adjusted difference, 52.3%; 95% CI, 45.2%-59.5%; P

Purpose To examine the relationship between glycemic control at baseline and response to anti–vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME). Design Post hoc analysis of 2 similarly designed phase III trials, VISTA and VIVID. Participants Patients with central-involved DME. Methods Both VISTA and VIVID compared efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) with macular laser photocoagulation for DME. Current analysis focused on comparison within each treatment group in an integrated VISTA and VIVID dataset. Baseline hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was partitioned into 4 quartiles: 4.5% to Main Outcome Measures Change from baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), and HbA1c. Results In the IAI group, mean BCVA improvement from baseline did not depend on baseline HbA1c at week 52 ( P = 0.1852), but seemed to be dependent at week 100 ( P = 0.0425). The mean CST reduction from baseline was independent of baseline HbA1c at both weeks 52 ( P = 0.1857) and 100 ( P = 0.7346). Mean HbA1c change from baseline in IAI group was small across all HbA1c quartiles. In the laser group, the mean BCVA gain decreased with increasing baseline HbA1c at both weeks 52 ( P = 0.0421) and 100 ( P = 0.0001). Similarly, the mean CST decrease was greater with decreasing baseline HbA1c, at both weeks 52 ( P = 0.0065) and 100 ( P = 0.0162). The mean HbA1c change from baseline in the laser group was minimal across HbA1c quartiles, although glycemic control tended to worsen in upper quartiles. Conclusions The benefit of IAI in patients with DME was less dependent on their presenting glycemic status as opposed to laser.

Purpose To assess the long-term safety and vision change in patients who received intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration in an extension study after completing VIEW 1 trial. Design Prospective, open-label, multicenter, extension study. Participants Three hundred twenty-three patients. Methods In VIEW 1, 1217 patients were randomized to receive fixed dosing of 0.5 mg IAI every 4 weeks (0.5q4), 2 mg IAI every 4 weeks (2q4), 2 mg IAI every 8 weeks after 3 initial monthly dosing (2q8), or 0.5 mg ranibizumab every 4 weeks (Rq4) from baseline through week 52, followed by modified quarterly injections of the same dose of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agent from weeks 52 to 96. After completing VIEW 1 at week 96, patients (n = 323) enrolled in an extension study and received 2 mg IAI on a modified quarterly injection schedule followed by at least an every 8-week dosing through week 212. Main Outcome Measures Long-term safety and vision change in patients followed for a median duration of 116 weeks in the extension study (total follow-up time of 212 weeks from the VIEW 1 baseline). Results Patients enrolled in the extension study gained a mean of 10.2 letters from the VIEW 1 baseline at week 96. These patients largely maintained vision over the extension study with a mean gain of 7.1 letters from the VIEW 1 baseline to week 212. The proportion of patients who lost ≥15 letters from the VIEW 1 extension baseline was 8.2% at week 212. Mean number of injections was 12.9 (range, 1–41) in the extension study. The most common serious ocular adverse event was endophthalmitis (0.9%). The overall incidence of Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration-defined arterial thromboembolic events was 6.2%. Conclusions Vision gains achieved with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in VIEW 1 were largely maintained by continued treatment with IAI 2 mg in the extension study. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections (including 4 years of IAI 2 mg) were well-tolerated with no new safety signals compared with the known profile of IAI.

To evaluate the impact of cataract surgery on visual and anatomic outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema treated with intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) or laser control and who did not require rescue therapy.Post hoc analysis of 2 phase 3 trials, Study of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema (VISTA) and Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection in Vision Impairment Due to DME (VIVID).Fifty-four patients (laser treatment, n = 11; IAI, n = 43) who underwent cataract surgery during the study period.In VISTA and VIVID, patients received IAI 2 mg every 4 weeks, IAI 2 mg every 8 weeks after 5 monthly doses, or laser control through week 100. Starting at week 24, if rescue treatment criteria were met, IAI patients received laser therapy, and laser therapy patients received IAI 2 mg every 8 weeks (after 5 monthly doses). Patients who received rescue treatment before cataract surgery were excluded.Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) in the laser control and pooled IAI groups before and after cataract surgery.The cumulative incidence of cataract surgery did not depend on treatment group assignment (rate ratio, = 1.517; 95% confidence interval, 0.782-2.944; P = 0.2174). At the last study visit before surgery, BCVA was 62.2 and 56.9 letters and CRT was 342 μm and 301 μm in the laser control and IAI groups, respectively. At the first study visit after cataract surgery, BCVA was improved significantly in both the laser control and IAI groups to 73.5 letters (P = 0.010 compared with last visit before surgery) and 67.2 letters (P0.001 compared with last visit before surgery), respectively. Corresponding change in CRT was a modest increase to 364 μm (P0.05 compared with last visit before surgery) and 359 μm (P = 0.013 compared with last visit before surgery), respectively.Incidence of cataract surgery was similar in both treatment groups. Despite a modest worsening in CRT after cataract surgery, BCVA was improved in both treatment groups.

Purpose To evaluate changes in retinal perfusion status with intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) and laser treatment in the phase 3 VISTA study of patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). Design Post hoc analysis of a double-masked, randomized, active-controlled, phase 3 trial. Participants Patients with center-involved DME in the study eye. Methods VISTA randomized 466 patients to laser, IAI 2 mg every 4 weeks (2q4), or IAI 2 mg every 8 weeks after 5 monthly doses (2q8). One eye per patient was enrolled in the study. Retinal perfusion status was evaluated by fluorescein angiography based on the presence or absence of retinal nonperfusion (RNP) in quadrants intersecting at the optic nerve head by a masked independent reading center at weeks 24, 52, 72, and 100. Visual and anatomic outcomes were evaluated at all visits. In patients who received rescue treatment, data were censored from the time rescue treatment was given. Main Outcome Measures Change in perfusion status from baseline through week 100. Results At week 100, the proportion of eyes with improvement in retinal perfusion (defined as a reduction from baseline in the total number of quadrants in which RNP is present) in the laser control, 2q4, and 2q8 groups was 14.6%, 44.7%, and 40.0%, respectively. The proportion of eyes that experienced worsening in retinal perfusion (defined as an increase from baseline in the total number of quadrants in which RNP is present) at week 100 in the laser control, 2q4, and 2q8 groups was 25.0%, 9.0%, and 8.6%, respectively. Conclusion Post hoc analysis of the phase 3 VISTA study in patients with DME provides evidence that regular IAI dosing not only can slow worsening of retinal perfusion associated with diabetic retinopathy but also may be able to improve retinal perfusion in some cases by decreasing zones of RNP.

Purpose To evaluate visual and anatomic outcomes after intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) versus laser in diabetic macular edema (DME) patients with and without prior anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment for DME. Design Post hoc analysis of eyes from 2 similarly designed, phase 3 trials, VISTA and VIVID. Participants Patients (eyes) with DME with central involvement from VISTA (n = 461) and VIVID (n = 404). Methods Eyes received IAI 2 mg every 4 weeks (2q4), IAI 2 mg every 8 weeks after 5 monthly doses (2q8), or macular laser photocoagulation. Main Outcome Measures This study reports exploratory outcomes through week 100. Analyses focused on VISTA because more patients received prior anti-VEGF therapy in VISTA (42.9%) versus VIVID (8.9%). Results Of 42.9% of patients in VISTA who received prior anti-VEGF treatment, 83.3% to 92.6% received ≥ 1 prior injections of bevacizumab, and 71.4% to 82.4% received bevacizumab only as prior anti-VEGF treatment for a duration ranging from 28 days to 3.9 years. In patients with prior anti-VEGF treatment, mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) changes from baseline in the IAI 2q4, IAI 2q8, and laser groups were +10.4 letters, +10.5 letters, and −0.7 letters at week 52 and +10.9 letters, +10.8 letters, and −0.8 letters at week 100, respectively. Corresponding changes in patients without prior anti-VEGF treatment were +14.1 letters, +11.0 letters, and +0.9 letters at week 52 and +12.0 letters, +11.3 letters, and +2.1 letters at week 100. In patients with prior anti-VEGF treatment, mean reductions in central retinal thickness were 180.2 μm, 192.2 μm, and 90.9 μm at week 52 and 180.1 μm, 196.4 μm, and 94.1 μm at week 100. Corresponding reductions in patients without prior anti-VEGF treatment were 190.3 μm, 175.7 μm, and 61.0 μm at week 52 and 200.0 μm, 186.7 μm, and 76.9 μm at week 100. The most frequent serious ocular adverse event was vitreous hemorrhage (1.3%, 0.7%, and 1.9%, respectively). Conclusions Visual and anatomic improvements over laser with both IAI regimens were significant and similar through week 100 in subgroups of patients in VISTA with and without prior anti-VEGF treatment for DME.

Purpose To determine week 52 efficacy and safety outcomes in eyes with macular edema after branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) treated with 2 mg intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) compared with grid laser. Design VIBRANT was a double-masked, randomized, phase 3 trial. Participants Eyes randomized and treated in VIBRANT were followed to week 52. Methods In the IAI group, eyes received IAI every 4 weeks through week 24 and IAI every 8 weeks through week 48 with rescue grid laser if needed at week 36. In the grid laser group, all eyes received grid laser at baseline and, if prespecified rescue criteria were met, 1 additional laser from week 12 to 20 and IAI every 8 weeks after 3 monthly doses from week 24 onward (the laser/IAI group). Main Outcome Measures The primary outcome measure was percentage of eyes with improvement from baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) letter score ≥15 at week 24. All outcome measures at week 52 were exploratory, and P values are considered nominal. Results The percentage of eyes with improvement from baseline letter score ≥15 in the IAI and laser/IAI groups was 52.7% versus 26.7% ( P = 0.0003) at week 24 and 57.1% versus 41.1% ( P = 0.0296) at week 52. The corresponding mean change from baseline BCVA letter score was 17.0 versus 6.9 ( P P = 0.0035) at week 52. The mean reduction from baseline central retinal thickness was 280.5 μm versus 128.0 μm ( P P = 0.0218) at week 52. In the IAI group, 10.6% of eyes received rescue laser at week 36, and in the laser/IAI group, 80.7% received rescue IAI from week 24 to week 48. Traumatic cataract in 1 eye (1.1%) in the IAI group was the only ocular serious adverse event. Conclusions After 6 monthly IAI, injections every 8 weeks maintained control of macular edema and visual benefits through week 52. In the laser group, rescue IAI given from week 24 onward resulted in substantial visual improvements at week 52.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of baseline factors on differences in vision gains with intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) versus laser control in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was an integrated post-hoc subanalysis of two phase 3 trials (VISTA, VIVID) in patients with DME. Least square (LS) mean differences of patients treated with IAI compared to laser control in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change from baseline at week 100 were evaluated for association with baseline demographics and baseline systemic disease characteristics. RESULTS: At week 100, LS mean differences in BCVA change from baseline with IAI compared to laser control were not significant for association with baseline age, gender, and race or status of glycosylated hemoglobin, body mass index, renal impairment, hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, and ischemic heart disease. CONCLUSION: Vision gains with IAI were significantly greater than laser control and were not influenced by demographics and systemic disease control at baseline. [ Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina . 2019;50:167–173.]

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Intravitreal aflibercept injection was superior to laser for visual and anatomical outcomes in Japanese patients with DME. In addition, intravitreal aflibercept injection resulted in efficacy and safety outcomes similar to those observed in a non-Japanese patient population., Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) in Japanese patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: VIVID-DME was a Phase 3 study comprising patients with DME randomized 1:1:1 to IAI 2 mg every 4 weeks (2q4), IAI 2 mg every 4 weeks until Week 16 then 8-week dosing (2q8), and laser. A total of 403 patients (76 Japanese) were included in this study. VIVID-Japan (72; all Japanese patients) was a nonrandomized, open-label study comprising Japanese patients with DME receiving IAI 2q4 until Week 16, then 2q8. Primary efficacy endpoint (Week 52) of VIVID-DME was mean change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity; VIVID-Japan evaluated safety and tolerability. Results: Mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (letters) for 2q4, 2q8, and laser groups was +10.6, +10.9, and +1.2 and +9.8, +9.5, and +1.1 in the non-Japanese and Japanese populations of VIVID-DME, respectively. In VIVID-Japan, it was +9.3 for IAI 2q8. Intravitreal aflibercept injection also provided consistently greater benefits for anatomical outcomes versus laser. Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of IAI. Conclusion: In Japanese patients with DME, IAI treatment was superior to laser for visual and anatomical outcomes and resulted in efficacy and safety outcomes similar to those in a non-Japanese patient population.

International audience; PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of intravitreal aflibercept (EYLEA, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, NY) versus laser on progression of diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity in Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection in Vision Impairment due to DME (VIVID-DME) and Study of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema (VISTA-DME).DESIGN: Secondary and exploratory analyses of 2 phase 3, randomized, controlled studies. PARTICIPANTS: All patients with a baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) score based on fundus photograph (full analysis), patients who progressed to proliferative DR (PDR) (safety analysis) in VIVID-DME (n = 403) and VISTA-DME (n = 459), or both. METHODS: We randomized patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) to intravitreal aflibercept 2 mg every 4 weeks (2q4), intravitreal aflibercept 2 mg every 8 weeks after 5 initial monthly doses (2q8), or macular laser photocoagulation at baseline and sham injections at every visit.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportions of patients with 2-step or more and 3-step or more improvements from baseline in DRSS score, who progressed to PDR, and who underwent panretinal photocoagulation (PRP).RESULTS: Among patients with an assessable baseline DRSS score, most showed moderately severe or severe nonproliferative DR. The proportions of patients treated with 2q4, 2q8, and laser with a 2-step or more improvement in DRSS score at week 100 were 29.3%, 32.6%, and 8.2%, respectively, in VIVID-DME and 37.0%, 37.1%, and 15.6%, respectively, in VISTA-DME; the proportions with a 3-step or more improvement in DRSS score were 7.3%, 2.3%, and 0%, respectively, and 22.7%, 19.9%, and 5.2%, respectively. Fewer patients in the 2q4 and 2q8 groups versus the laser group progressed to PDR at week 100 in VISTA-DME (1.5% and 2.2% vs. 5.3%) and VIVID-DME (3.2% and 2.0% vs. 12.3%). The proportions of patients who underwent PRP were 2.9%, 0.7%, and 4.5%, respectively, in VIVID-DME and 1.9%, 0.7%, and 5.2%, respectively, in VISTA-DME. The most frequent serious ocular adverse event at week 100 was cataract (pooled intravitreal aflibercept, 1.7% of patients; laser, 3.5% of patients).CONCLUSIONS: These analyses demonstrate the benefit of intravitreal aflibercept over laser with respect to DR progression, suggesting a benefit on DME, and on underlying DR.

Purpose To compare efficacy and safety of 2 dosing regimens of intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) with macular laser photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema (DME). Design Two similarly designed, randomized, phase 3 trials, VISTA DME and VIVID DME . Participants Patients (eyes; n=872) with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus who had DME with central involvement. Methods Eyes received IAI 2 mg every 4 weeks (2q4), IAI 2 mg every 8 weeks after 5 monthly doses (2q8), or laser control. Main Outcome Measures The primary end point was mean change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at week 52. This report presents the 100-week results including mean change from baseline in BCVA, proportion of eyes that gained ≥15 letters, and proportion of eyes with a ≥2-step improvement in the Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) score. Results Mean BCVA gain from baseline to week 100 with IAI 2q4, IAI 2q8, and laser control was 11.5, 11.1, and 0.9 letters ( P P P P ≤ 0.0001) in VIVID. The proportion of eyes that lost ≥15 letters at week 100 was 3.2%, 0.7%, and 9.7% ( P ≤ 0.0220) in VISTA and 2.2%, 1.5%, and 12.9% ( P ≤ 0.0008) in VIVID. Significantly more eyes in the IAI 2q4 and 2q8 groups versus those in the laser control group had a ≥2 step improvement in the DRSS score in both VISTA (37.0% and 37.1% vs. 15.6%; P P ≤ 0.0004). In an integrated safety analysis, the most frequent serious ocular adverse event was cataract (2.4%, 1.0%, and 0.3% for 2q4, 2q8, and control). Conclusions In both VISTA and VIVID, the 52-week visual and anatomic superiority of IAI over laser control was sustained through week 100, with similar efficacy in the 2q4 and 2q8 groups. Safety in these studies was consistent with the known safety profile of IAI.

To evaluate benefit of continued treatment in diabetic macular edema (DME) eyes showing a limited early response to treatment.Post hoc analysis of VISTA and VIVID.818 patients (eyes) with DME.Eyes with baseline central subfield thickness (CST) of ≥300 μm that received 2-mg intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) every 4 weeks (2q4) or every 8 weeks after 5 monthly injections (2q8) or laser control treatment were included in this analysis if they showed a limited early response at week 12 after 3 monthly injections or a single laser treatment at baseline, as defined by those who met: anatomic criteria (CST reduction ≤10% and CST300 μm); visual criteria (best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA] gain5 letters); or both. Least square (LS) means repeated measures were used to compare outcomes between initial (baseline-week 12) and later (weeks 16-100) periods within each treatment group.Visual outcomes of eyes with limited early response through week 100.In the anatomic subgroup, mean BCVA gains with 2q4 (n = 41) and 2q8 (n = 31) from baseline were 4.3 and 6.6 letters at week 12 and 8.6 and 8.5 letters at week 100, respectively. Corresponding LS mean differences for BCVA gains between initial and later periods were 3.0 (P = 0.0026) and 3.6 letters (P = 0.0017), respectively. In the visual subgroup, mean BCVA gains with 2q4 (n = 53) and 2q8 (n = 49) from baseline were 0.4 and 0.3 letters at week 12 and 6.1 and 4.1 letters at week 100, respectively. Corresponding LS mean differences for BCVA gains between initial and later periods were 5.0 (P0.0001) and 3.1 letters (P = 0.0008), respectively. In the combined subgroup, only a small percentage of IAI-treated eyes (7%) met criteria. Regardless of type of limited early response, continued laser treatment did not result in additional BCVA gains through week 100.Significant vision improvements were observed through week 100 with continued IAI treatment in a small number of DME eyes that showed a limited early response after 3 monthly IAI.

To evaluate whether select baseline systemic and ocular factors influence ≥2-step improvement in the Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) score at week 100 in VISTA and VIVID.Post hoc analysis of 2 similarly designed phase 3 trials, VISTA and VIVID.Total of 456 patients with center-involved diabetic macular edema (DME).VISTA and VIVID randomized 872 DME patients to receive intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) 2 mg every 4 weeks (2q4), IAI 2 mg every 8 weeks after 5 monthly doses (2q8), or macular laser photocoagulation. This post hoc analysis evaluated the influence of select baseline factors on ≥2-step DRSS score improvement by logistic regression in an integrated VISTA and VIVID dataset using observed cases (n = 456) with patients in each treatment group divided into tertiles based on each characteristic.Proportion of patients with ≥2-step improvement in DRSS score from baseline at week 100 by age, duration of diabetes, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), body mass index (BMI), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), and DRSS score.At week 100, 10.1%, 34.3%, and 37.6% of patients in the laser, 2q4, and 2q8 groups experienced a ≥2-step DRSS score improvement, respectively. Age, duration of diabetes, HbA1c, BMI, BCVA, and CST had no impact on the ability to achieve ≥2-step improvement in DRSS score. Initial DRSS score was the only factor significantly associated with ≥2-step DRSS score improvement in all treatment groups at weeks 24, 52, 76, and 100. Relatively higher proportions of IAI-treated patients with worse BCVA or thicker CST experienced ≥2-step DRSS score improvement compared with those with better BCVA or thinner CST, respectively, but these associations were not statistically significant.A strong association was present between baseline DRSS score and ≥2-step DRSS score improvement at week 100 for DME patients in VISTA and VIVID.

To assess the long-term safety and vision change in patients who received intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration in an extension study after completing VIEW 1 trial.Prospective, open-label, multicenter, extension study.Three hundred twenty-three patients.In VIEW 1, 1217 patients were randomized to receive fixed dosing of 0.5 mg IAI every 4 weeks (0.5q4), 2 mg IAI every 4 weeks (2q4), 2 mg IAI every 8 weeks after 3 initial monthly dosing (2q8), or 0.5 mg ranibizumab every 4 weeks (Rq4) from baseline through week 52, followed by modified quarterly injections of the same dose of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agent from weeks 52 to 96. After completing VIEW 1 at week 96, patients (n = 323) enrolled in an extension study and received 2 mg IAI on a modified quarterly injection schedule followed by at least an every 8-week dosing through week 212.Long-term safety and vision change in patients followed for a median duration of 116 weeks in the extension study (total follow-up time of 212 weeks from the VIEW 1 baseline).Patients enrolled in the extension study gained a mean of 10.2 letters from the VIEW 1 baseline at week 96. These patients largely maintained vision over the extension study with a mean gain of 7.1 letters from the VIEW 1 baseline to week 212. The proportion of patients who lost ≥15 letters from the VIEW 1 extension baseline was 8.2% at week 212. Mean number of injections was 12.9 (range, 1-41) in the extension study. The most common serious ocular adverse event was endophthalmitis (0.9%). The overall incidence of Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration-defined arterial thromboembolic events was 6.2%.Vision gains achieved with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in VIEW 1 were largely maintained by continued treatment with IAI 2 mg in the extension study. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections (including 4 years of IAI 2 mg) were well-tolerated with no new safety signals compared with the known profile of IAI.

Importance Information on the effect of anti–vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) with vision loss after macular laser photocoagulation is clinically valuable. Objective To evaluate visual and anatomic outcomes in a subgroup of macular laser photocoagulation treatment control (hereafter laser control) eyes with substantial vision loss receiving treatment with intravitreal aflibercept injection. Design, Setting, and Participants This investigation was a post hoc analysis of a subgroup of laser control eyes in 2 phase 3 trials—VISTA (Study of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema) and VIVID (Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection in Vision Impairment Due to DME)—in a multicenter setting. One hundred nine laser control eyes with center-involving DME were included. Interventions Treatment with intravitreal aflibercept injection (2 mg) every 8 weeks after 5 monthly doses with sham injections on nontreatment visits starting at week 24 was initiated on meeting prespecified criteria of at least a 10-letter visual acuity loss at 2 consecutive visits or at least a 15-letter visual acuity loss from the best previous measurement at 1 visit and vision not better than at baseline. Main Outcomes and Measures Visual and anatomic outcomes in a subgroup of laser control eyes receiving treatment with intravitreal aflibercept injection. Results Through week 100, a total of 63 of 154 eyes (40.9%) in VISTA and 46 of 133 eyes (34.6%) in VIVID initially randomized to laser control received treatment with intravitreal aflibercept injection. The median time from week 24 to the first intravitreal aflibercept injection treatment was 34.0 (VISTA) and 83.5 (VIVID) days. In this subgroup, the mean (SD) visual gain from baseline to week 100 was 2.2 (12.5) (VISTA) and 3.8 (10.1) (VIVID) letters. At the time of intravitreal aflibercept injection initiation, these eyes had a mean (SD) loss of 11.0 (10.1) (VISTA) and 10.0 (6.5) (VIVID) letters from baseline, and they subsequently gained a mean (SD) of 17.4 (9.7) (VISTA) and 13.6 (8.6) (VIVID) letters from the initiation of treatment with intravitreal aflibercept injection through week 100. There was a minimal mean change in central subfield thickness from baseline in these eyes at the time of intravitreal aflibercept injection initiation (an increase of 3.9 μm in VISTA and a decrease of 3.0 μm in VIVID), after which further mean (SD) reductions of 285.6 (202.6) μm (VISTA) and 313.4 (181.9) μm (VIVID) occurred through week 100. Conclusions and Relevance Intravitreal aflibercept injection improves visual and anatomic outcomes in eyes experiencing substantial vision loss after macular laser photocoagulation treatment for DME. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifiers:NCT01363440andNCT01331681

Purpose: To determine efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) during a second year of variable dosing after a first-year fixed-dosing period. Design: Two randomized, double-masked, active-controlled, phase 3 trials. Participants: Two thousand four hundred fifty-seven patients with neovascular AMD. Methods: From baseline to week 52, patients received 0.5 mg intravitreal ranibizumab every 4 weeks (Rq4), 2 mg aflibercept every 4 weeks (2q4), 0.5 mg aflibercept every 4 weeks (0.5q4), or 2 mg aflibercept every 8 weeks (2q8) after 3 monthly injections. During weeks 52 through 96, patients received their original dosing assignment using an as-needed regimen with defined retreatment criteria and mandatory dosing at least every 12 weeks. Main Outcome Measures: Proportion of eyes at week 96 that maintained best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; lost

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept injections for treatment of macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). DESIGN: A randomized, multicenter, double-masked phase 3 study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 177 treatment-naive patients with macular edema secondary to CRVO were randomized in a 3:2 ratio. METHODS: Patients received either 2-mg intravitreal aflibercept or sham injections every 4 weeks for 20 weeks. From week 24 to 48, the aflibercept group received aflibercept as needed (pro re nata [PRN]), and the sham group continued receiving sham injections. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients who gained 15 letters or more in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at week 24. This study reports week 52 results including the proportion of patients who gained 15 letters or more in BCVA and the mean change from baseline BCVA and central retinal thickness. Efficacy end points at week 52 were all exploratory. RESULTS: At week 52, the mean percentage of patients gaining 15 letters or more was 60.2% in the aflibercept group and 32.4% in the sham group (P = 0.0004). Aflibercept patients, compared with sham patients, had a significantly higher mean improvement in BCVA (+16.9 letters vs. +3.8 letters, respectively) and reduction in central retinal thickness (-423.5 μm vs. -219.3 μm, respectively) at week 52 (P

To examine the relationship between glycemic control at baseline and response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME).Post hoc analysis of 2 similarly designed phase III trials, VISTA and VIVID.Patients with central-involved DME.Both VISTA and VIVID compared efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) with macular laser photocoagulation for DME. Current analysis focused on comparison within each treatment group in an integrated VISTA and VIVID dataset. Baseline hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was partitioned into 4 quartiles: 4.5% to6.7% (n = 233), 6.7% to7.4% (n = 206), 7.4% to8.6% (n = 209), and 8.6% to14.7% (n = 208). Outcomes were analyzed by mixed model for repeated measures. Intragroup differences were quantified by a regression model.Change from baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), and HbA1c.In the IAI group, mean BCVA improvement from baseline did not depend on baseline HbA1c at week 52 (P = 0.1852), but seemed to be dependent at week 100 (P = 0.0425). The mean CST reduction from baseline was independent of baseline HbA1c at both weeks 52 (P = 0.1857) and 100 (P = 0.7346). Mean HbA1c change from baseline in IAI group was small across all HbA1c quartiles. In the laser group, the mean BCVA gain decreased with increasing baseline HbA1c at both weeks 52 (P = 0.0421) and 100 (P = 0.0001). Similarly, the mean CST decrease was greater with decreasing baseline HbA1c, at both weeks 52 (P = 0.0065) and 100 (P = 0.0162). The mean HbA1c change from baseline in the laser group was minimal across HbA1c quartiles, although glycemic control tended to worsen in upper quartiles.The benefit of IAI in patients with DME was less dependent on their presenting glycemic status as opposed to laser.

To determine bioactivity and duration of effect of intravitreal aflibercept injection (also known as vascular endothelial growth factor Trap-Eye) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD).In this double-masked, phase 1 study, 28 patients with lesions ≤12 disc areas, ≥50% active choroidal neovascularization (CNV), and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≤20/40 were randomized 1:1 to a single intravitreal injection of aflibercept 0.15 or 4 mg. The primary end point was the change from baseline in central retinal/lesion thickness (CR/LT) at week-8. Secondary outcomes were the change from baseline BCVA, the change in CNV lesion size and area of leakage, and proportion of patients requiring repeat injection at 8 weeks.Mean percent decrease in CR/LT for the 4-mg and 0.15-mg groups was, respectively, 34.2 versus 13.3 at week 4 (P=0.0065), 23.8 versus 5.9 at week 6 (P=0.0380), and 25.2% versus 11.3% at week 8 (P=0.150). The 4-mg group gained a mean of 4.5 letters in BCVA (6/14 patients gaining ≥10 letters) versus 1.1 letters in 0.15-mg group (1/14 gaining ≥10 letters) at week 8. Fewer patients needed retreatment in the 4-mg group at week 8. No serious adverse event or ocular inflammation was reported in either group.Intravitreal aflibercept 4 mg had a safety profile similar to that of the very low dose 0.15 mg, and was well-tolerated. The 4-mg dose significantly reduced foveal thickening at weeks 4 and 6, significantly improved BCVA at weeks 6, and reduced the need for repeat injection after 8 weeks compared with intravitreal aflibercept 0.15 mg in neovascular AMD patients.

Purpose To assess the ocular and systemic safety of intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) compared with controls in IAI trials in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), macular edema following central retinal vein occlusion (MEfCRVO), macular edema following branch retinal vein occlusion (MEfBRVO), and diabetic macular edema (DME). Design Comprehensive review of 10 phase II and III trials of IAI in retinal diseases. Participants Patients were included from IAI trials in nAMD (CLEAR-IT 2 [52 weeks], VIEW 1 [96 weeks], VIEW 2 [96 weeks], VIEW 1 extension [208 weeks]); MEfCRVO (COPERNICUS [100 weeks], GALILEO [76 weeks]); MEfBRVO (VIBRANT [52 weeks]); and DME (DA VINCI [52 weeks], VIVID [100 weeks], VISTA [100 weeks]). Methods Rates were calculated as events/100 person-years at risk (PYR). When applicable, rate ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were provided. Main Outcome Measures Outcomes included rates for intraocular inflammation, endophthalmitis, serious adverse events (SAEs), wound-healing complications, hypertension (HTN), adjudicated Anti-Platelet Trialists' Collaboration (APTC)–defined arterial thromboembolic events (ATEs) (nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and vascular death), and death from all causes. Results More than 4000 patients contributed >7000 PYR. For all outcomes, there were no meaningful differences between evaluated adverse event rates for IAI and controls. Overall intraocular inflammation rates were 2.37 (control) and 2.06 (IAI); overall RR was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.61–1.27). Overall endophthalmitis rates were 0.52 (control) and 0.22 (IAI); overall RR was 0.42 (95% CI, 0.18–1.03). Overall SAE rates were 23.09 (control) and 20.80 (IAI); overall RR was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.80–1.02). Overall rates of wound-healing complications were 0.17 (control) and 0.15 (IAI); overall RR was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.24–3.86). Overall HTN rates were 14.87 (control) and 11.27 (IAI), with an overall RR of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.65–0.89); HTN rates were highest in MEfBRVO and lowest in nAMD. For adjudicated APTC-defined ATEs, rates were 2.04 (control) and 2.19 (IAI), with an RR of 1.07 (95% CI, 0.73–1.61). Overall death rates were 1.16 (control) and 1.49 (IAI); overall RR was 1.28 (95% CI, 0.80–2.15). Conclusions Rates of selected ocular and systemic adverse events with IAI were similar to those of controls and similar across disease states in evaluated IAI trials. Intravitreal aflibercept injection was generally well tolerated in the patients evaluated.

To compare different doses and dosing regimens of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Trap-Eye with laser photocoagulation in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME).Randomized, double-masked, multicenter, phase 2 clinical trial.Diabetic patients (n = 221) with center-involved DME.Participants were assigned randomly to 1 of 5 treatment regimens: VEGF Trap-Eye 0.5 mg every 4 weeks (0.5q4); 2 mg every 4 weeks (2q4); 2 mg every 8 weeks after 3 initial monthly doses (2q8); or 2 mg dosing as needed after 3 initial monthly doses (2PRN), or macular laser photocoagulation.The change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 24 weeks (the primary end point) and at 52 weeks, proportion of eyes that gained 15 letters or more in Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) BCVA, and mean changes in central retinal thickness (CRT) from baseline.As previously reported, mean improvements in BCVA in the VEGF Trap-Eye groups at week 24 were 8.6, 11.4, 8.5, and 10.3 letters for 0.5q4, 2q4, 2q8, and 2PRN regimens, respectively, versus 2.5 letters for the laser group (P ≤ 0.0085 versus laser). Mean improvements in BCVA in the VEGF Trap-Eye groups at week 52 were 11.0, 13.1, 9.7, and 12.0 letters for 0.5q4, 2q4, 2q8, and 2PRN regimens, respectively, versus -1.3 letters for the laser group (P ≤ 0.0001 versus laser). Proportions of eyes with gains in BCVA of 15 or more ETDRS letters at week 52 in the VEGF Trap-Eye groups were 40.9%, 45.5%, 23.8%, and 42.2% versus 11.4% for laser (P = 0.0031, P = 0.0007, P = 0.1608, and P = 0.0016, respectively, versus laser). Mean reductions in CRT in the VEGF Trap-Eye groups at week 52 were -165.4 μm, -227.4 μm, -187.8 μm, and -180.3 μm versus -58.4 μm for laser (P0.0001 versus laser). Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Trap-Eye generally was well tolerated. The most frequent ocular adverse events with VEGF Trap-Eye were conjunctival hemorrhage, eye pain, ocular hyperemia, and increased intraocular pressure, whereas common systemic adverse events included hypertension, nausea, and congestive heart failure.Significant gains in BCVA from baseline achieved at week 24 were maintained or improved at week 52 in all VEGF Trap-Eye groups. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Trap-Eye warrants further investigation for the treatment of DME.

Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of intravitreal vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) Trap-Eye in eyes with macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). Design Multicenter, randomized, prospective, controlled trial. Participants One hundred eighty-nine eyes with macular edema secondary to CRVO. Methods Eyes were randomized 3:2 to receive VEGF Trap-Eye 2 mg or sham injection monthly for 6 months. Main Outcome Measures The proportion of eyes with a ≥15-letter gain or more in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at week 24 (primary efficacy end point), mean changes in BCVA and central retinal thickness (CRT), and proportion of eyes progressing to neovascularization of the anterior segment, optic disc, or elsewhere in the retina. Results At week 24, 56.1% of VEGF Trap-Eye treated eyes gained 15 letters or more from baseline versus 12.3% of sham-treated eyes ( P P P P = 0.006). Conjunctival hemorrhage, reduced visual acuity, and eye pain were the most common adverse events (AEs). Serious ocular AEs were reported by 3.5% of VEGF Trap-Eye patients and 13.5% of sham patients. Incidences of nonocular serious AEs generally were well balanced between both groups. Conclusions At 24 weeks, monthly intravitreal injection of VEGF Trap-Eye 2 mg in eyes with macular edema resulting from CRVO improved visual acuity and CRT, eliminated progression resulting from neovascularization, and was associated with a low rate of ocular AEs related to treatment. Financial Disclosure(s) Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

To evaluate visual and anatomic outcomes after intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) versus laser in diabetic macular edema (DME) patients with and without prior anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment for DME.Post hoc analysis of eyes from 2 similarly designed, phase 3 trials, VISTA and VIVID.Patients (eyes) with DME with central involvement from VISTA (n = 461) and VIVID (n = 404).Eyes received IAI 2 mg every 4 weeks (2q4), IAI 2 mg every 8 weeks after 5 monthly doses (2q8), or macular laser photocoagulation.This study reports exploratory outcomes through week 100. Analyses focused on VISTA because more patients received prior anti-VEGF therapy in VISTA (42.9%) versus VIVID (8.9%).Of 42.9% of patients in VISTA who received prior anti-VEGF treatment, 83.3% to 92.6% received ≥ 1 prior injections of bevacizumab, and 71.4% to 82.4% received bevacizumab only as prior anti-VEGF treatment for a duration ranging from 28 days to 3.9 years. In patients with prior anti-VEGF treatment, mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) changes from baseline in the IAI 2q4, IAI 2q8, and laser groups were +10.4 letters, +10.5 letters, and -0.7 letters at week 52 and +10.9 letters, +10.8 letters, and -0.8 letters at week 100, respectively. Corresponding changes in patients without prior anti-VEGF treatment were +14.1 letters, +11.0 letters, and +0.9 letters at week 52 and +12.0 letters, +11.3 letters, and +2.1 letters at week 100. In patients with prior anti-VEGF treatment, mean reductions in central retinal thickness were 180.2 μm, 192.2 μm, and 90.9 μm at week 52 and 180.1 μm, 196.4 μm, and 94.1 μm at week 100. Corresponding reductions in patients without prior anti-VEGF treatment were 190.3 μm, 175.7 μm, and 61.0 μm at week 52 and 200.0 μm, 186.7 μm, and 76.9 μm at week 100. The most frequent serious ocular adverse event was vitreous hemorrhage (1.3%, 0.7%, and 1.9%, respectively).Visual and anatomic improvements over laser with both IAI regimens were significant and similar through week 100 in subgroups of patients in VISTA with and without prior anti-VEGF treatment for DME.

PURPOSE To evaluate retinal sensitivity in patients with diabetic macular edema who received intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) or laser. METHODS A substudy included 46 patients from DA VINCI (a randomized, double-masked Phase 2 study) receiving either laser, 0.5 mg IAI every 4 weeks, 2 mg IAI every 4 weeks, 2 mg IAI every 8 weeks after 3 monthly doses (2q8), or 2 mg IAI as-needed after 3 monthly doses for 52 weeks. Retinal sensitivity was measured in one (central), five (one central and four inner), and eight (four inner and four outer) optical coherence tomography subfields. RESULTS Mean best-corrected visual acuity improvement in the subgroup at Week 52 was 3.3 letters with laser and ranged from 5.4 to 16.3 letters in the IAI groups. Retinal sensitivity of laser patients at Week 52 was comparable with baseline in the central optical coherence tomography subfield but decreased in the five and eight optical coherence tomography subfields. Compared with laser, retinal sensitivity significantly increased with IAI in the 2q8 and pooled IAI groups in the 5 and 8 optical coherence tomography subfields at Week 52 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Intravitreal aflibercept injection improved best-corrected visual acuity and retinal sensitivity in this subgroup of patients. Laser may cause a deterioration of macular function that is not detectable with best-corrected visual acuity testing.

To compare the efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) with macular grid laser photocoagulation for the treatment of macular edema after branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).The VIBRANT study was a double-masked, active-controlled, randomized, phase III trial.Treatment-naïve eyes with macular edema after BRVO were included in the study if the occlusion occurred within 12 months and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was between ≤73 and ≥24 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters (20/40-20/320 Snellen equivalent).Eyes (1 eye per patient) received either IAI 2 mg every 4 weeks (n=91) from baseline to week 20 or grid laser (n=92) at baseline with a single grid laser rescue treatment, if needed, from weeks 12 through 20.The primary outcome measure was the proportion of eyes that gained ≥15 ETDRS letters from baseline BCVA at week 24. Secondary end points included mean change from baseline BCVA and central retinal thickness (CRT) at week 24.The proportion of eyes that gained ≥15 ETDRS letters from baseline at week 24 was 52.7% in the IAI group compared with 26.7% in the laser group (P=0.0003). The mean improvement from baseline BCVA at week 24 was 17.0 ETDRS letters in the IAI group and 6.9 ETDRS letters in the laser group (P0.0001). The mean reduction in CRT from baseline at week 24 was 280.5 μm in the IAI group and 128.0 μm in the laser group (P0.0001). Traumatic cataract in an IAI patient was the only ocular serious adverse event (SAE) that occurred. There were no cases of intraocular inflammation or endophthalmitis. The incidence of nonocular SAEs was 8.8% in the IAI group and 9.8% in the laser group. One Anti-Platelet Trialists' Collaboration-defined event of nonfatal stroke (1.1%) and 1 death (1.1%) due to pneumonia occurred during the 24 weeks of the study, both in patients in the laser group.Monthly IAI provided significantly greater visual benefit and reduction in CRT at 24 weeks than grid laser photocoagulation in eyes with macular edema after BRVO.

A head-to-head comparison was performed between vascular endothelial growth factor blockade and laser for treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME).Two similarly designed, double-masked, randomized, phase 3 trials, VISTA(DME) and VIVID(DME).We included 872 patients (eyes) with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus who presented with DME with central involvement.Eyes received either intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) 2 mg every 4 weeks (2q4), IAI 2 mg every 8 weeks after 5 initial monthly doses (2q8), or macular laser photocoagulation.The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters at week 52. Secondary efficacy endpoints at week 52 included the proportion of eyes that gained ≥ 15 letters from baseline and the mean change from baseline in central retinal thickness as determined by optical coherence tomography.Mean BCVA gains from baseline to week 52 in the IAI 2q4 and 2q8 groups versus the laser group were 12.5 and 10.7 versus 0.2 letters (P0.0001) in VISTA, and 10.5 and 10.7 versus 1.2 letters (P0.0001) in VIVID. The corresponding proportions of eyes gaining ≥ 15 letters were 41.6% and 31.1% versus 7.8% (P0.0001) in VISTA, and 32.4% and 33.3% versus 9.1% (P0.0001) in VIVID. Similarly, mean reductions in central retinal thickness were 185.9 and 183.1 versus 73.3 μm (P0.0001) in VISTA, and 195.0 and 192.4 versus 66.2 μm (P0.0001) in VIVID. Overall incidences of ocular and nonocular adverse events and serious adverse events, including the Anti-Platelet Trialists' Collaboration-defined arterial thromboembolic events and vascular deaths, were similar across treatment groups.At week 52, IAI demonstrated significant superiority in functional and anatomic endpoints over laser, with similar efficacy in the 2q4 and 2q8 groups despite the extended dosing interval in the 2q8 group. In general, IAI was well-tolerated.

Purpose To evaluate intravitreal aflibercept for treatment of macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). Design Randomized, double-masked, phase 3 study. Methods A total of 177 patients with macular edema secondary to CRVO were randomized to receive 2 mg intravitreal aflibercept (n = 106) or sham (n = 71) every 4 weeks for 20 weeks. From weeks 24 to 48, patients were monitored every 4 weeks; the former group received intravitreal aflibercept as needed (PRN), and the sham group received sham. From weeks 52 to 76, patients were monitored every 8 weeks, and both groups received intravitreal aflibercept PRN. The primary endpoint (proportion of patients who gained ≥15 letters) was at week 24. This study reports exploratory outcomes at week 76. Results The proportion of patients who gained ≥15 letters in the intravitreal aflibercept and sham groups was 60.2% vs 22.1% at week 24 (patients discontinued before week 24 were considered nonresponders; P P P .001). Mean μm change from baseline central retinal thickness was −448.6 vs −169.3 at week 24 ( P P P = .1122). Over 76 weeks, the most common ocular serious adverse event in the intravitreal aflibercept group was macular edema (3.8%). Conclusions The visual and anatomic improvements seen after fixed, monthly dosing at week 24 were largely maintained when treatment intervals were extended. Patients with macular edema following CRVO benefited from early treatment with intravitreal aflibercept.

During neural induction, the 'organizer' of the vertebrate embryo instructs neighbouring ectodermal cells to become nervous system rather than epidermis. This process is generally thought to occur around the mid-gastrula stage of embryogenesis. Here we report the isolation of ERNI, an early response gene to signals from the organizer (Hensen's node). Using ERNI as a marker, we present evidence that neural induction begins before gastrulation--much earlier in development than previously thought. We show that the organizer and some of its precursor cells produce a fibroblast growth factor signal, which can initiate, and is required for, neural induction.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) for the treatment of macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).Randomized, double-masked, phase 3 trial.A total of 188 patients with macular edema secondary to CRVO.Patients received IAI 2 mg (IAI 2Q4) (n = 114) or sham injections (n = 74) every 4 weeks up to week 24. During weeks 24 to 52, patients from both arms were evaluated monthly and received IAI as needed, or pro re nata (PRN) (IAI 2Q4 + PRN and sham + IAI PRN). During weeks 52 to 100, patients were evaluated at least quarterly and received IAI PRN.The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients who gained ≥ 15 letters in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to week 24. This study reports week 100 results.The proportion of patients gaining ≥ 15 letters was 56.1% versus 12.3% (P0.001) at week 24, 55.3% versus 30.1% (P0.001) at week 52, and 49.1% versus 23.3% (P0.001) at week 100 in the IAI 2Q4 + PRN and sham + IAI PRN groups, respectively. The mean change from baseline BCVA was also significantly higher in the IAI 2Q4 + PRN group compared with the sham + IAI PRN group at week 24 (+17.3 vs. -4.0 letters; P0.001), week 52 (+16.2 vs. +3.8 letters; P0.001), and week 100 (+13.0 vs. +1.5 letters; P0.0001). The mean reduction from baseline in central retinal thickness was 457.2 versus 144.8 μm (P0.001) at week 24, 413.0 versus 381.8 μm at week 52 (P = 0.546), and 390.0 versus 343.3 μm at week 100 (P = 0.366) in the IAI 2Q4 + PRN and sham + IAI PRN groups, respectively. The mean number (standard deviation) of PRN injections in the IAI 2Q4 + PRN and sham + IAI PRN groups was 2.7 ± 1.7 versus 3.9 ± 2.0 during weeks 24 to 52 and 3.3 ± 2.1 versus 2.9 ± 2.0 during weeks 52 to 100, respectively. The most frequent ocular serious adverse event from baseline to week 100 was vitreous hemorrhage (0.9% vs. 6.8% in the IAI 2Q4 + PRN and sham + IAI PRN groups, respectively).The visual and anatomic improvements after fixed dosing through week 24 and PRN dosing with monthly monitoring from weeks 24 to 52 were diminished after continued PRN dosing, with a reduced monitoring frequency from weeks 52 to 100.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept injections for treatment of macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).A randomized, multicenter, double-masked phase 3 study.A total of 177 treatment-naive patients with macular edema secondary to CRVO were randomized in a 3:2 ratio.Patients received either 2-mg intravitreal aflibercept or sham injections every 4 weeks for 20 weeks. From week 24 to 48, the aflibercept group received aflibercept as needed (pro re nata [PRN]), and the sham group continued receiving sham injections.The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients who gained 15 letters or more in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at week 24. This study reports week 52 results including the proportion of patients who gained 15 letters or more in BCVA and the mean change from baseline BCVA and central retinal thickness. Efficacy end points at week 52 were all exploratory.At week 52, the mean percentage of patients gaining 15 letters or more was 60.2% in the aflibercept group and 32.4% in the sham group (P = 0.0004). Aflibercept patients, compared with sham patients, had a significantly higher mean improvement in BCVA (+16.9 letters vs. +3.8 letters, respectively) and reduction in central retinal thickness (-423.5 μm vs. -219.3 μm, respectively) at week 52 (P 0.0001 for both). Aflibercept patients received a mean of 2.5 injections (standard deviation, 1.7 injections) during PRN dosing. The most common ocular adverse events in the aflibercept group were related to the injection procedure or the underlying disease, and included macular edema (33.7%), increased intraocular pressure (17.3%), and eye pain (14.4%).Treatment with intravitreal aflibercept provided significant functional and anatomic benefits after 52 weeks as compared with sham. The improvements achieved after 6 monthly doses at week 24 largely were maintained until week 52 with as-needed dosing. Intravitreal aflibercept generally was well tolerated.

To evaluate intravitreal VEGF Trap-Eye (VTE) in patients with macular oedema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).In this double-masked study, 177 patients were randomised (3:2 ratio) to intravitreal injections of VTE 2 mg or sham procedure every 4 weeks for 24 weeks. Best-corrected visual acuity was evaluated using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart. Central retinal thickness (CRT) was measured with optical coherence tomography.From baseline until week 24, more patients receiving VTE (60.2%) gained ≥ 15 letters compared with those receiving sham injections (22.1%) (p0.0001). VTE patients gained a mean of 18.0 letters compared with 3.3 letters with sham injections (p0.0001). Mean CRT decreased by 448.6 and 169.3 µm in the VTE and sham groups (p0.0001). The most frequent ocular adverse events in the VTE arm were typically associated with the injection procedure or the underlying disease, and included eye pain (11.5%), increased intraocular pressure (9.6%) and conjunctival haemorrhage (8.7%).VTE 2 mg every 4 weeks was efficacious in CRVO with an acceptable safety profile. Vision gains with VTE were significantly higher than with observation/panretinal photocoagulation if needed. Based on these data, VTE may provide a new treatment option for CRVO.

Regulation of central neurogenesis by a peripheral target has been previously demonstrated in the ventral nerve cord of the leech Hirudo medicinalis (Baptista, C. A., Gershon, T. R. and Macagno, E. R. (1990). Nature 346, 855-858) Specifically, innervation of the male genitalia by the fifth and sixth segmental ganglia (the sex ganglia) was shown to trigger the birth of several hundred central neurons (PIC neurons) in these ganglia. As reported here, removal of the target early during induction shows that PIC neurons can be independently induced in each side of a ganglion, indicating that the inductive signal is both highly localized and conveyed to each hemiganglion independently. Further, since recent observations (Becker, T., Berliner, A. J., Nitabach, M. N., Gan, W.-B. and Macagno, E. R. (1995). Development, 121, 359-369) had indicated that efferent projections are probably involved in this phenomenon, we individually ablated all possible candidates, which led to the identification of two central neurons that appear to play significant roles in conveying the inductive signal to the CNS. Ablation of a single ML neuron reduced cell proliferation in its own hemiganglion by nearly 50%, on the average. In contrast, proliferation on the opposite side of the ganglion increased by about 25%, suggesting the possibility of a compensatory response by the remaining contralateral ML neuron. Simultaneous ablation of both ML neurons in a sex ganglion caused similar reductions in cell proliferation in each hemiganglion. Deletion of a single AL neuron produced a weaker (7%) but nonetheless reproducible reduction. Ablation of the other nine central neurons that might have been involved in PIC neuron induction had no detectable effect. Both ML and AL neurons exhibit ipsilateral peripheral projections, and both arborize mostly in the hemiganglion where they reside. Thus, we conclude that peripheral regulation of central neurogenesis is mediated in the leech by inductive signals conveyed retrogradely to each hemiganglion by specific central neurons that innervate this target and the hemiganglion they affect.

To evaluate intravitreal aflibercept injections (IAI; also called VEGF Trap-Eye) for patients with macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).Randomized controlled trial.This multicenter study randomized 189 patients (1 eye/patient) with macular edema secondary to CRVO to receive 6 monthly injections of either 2 mg intravitreal aflibercept (IAI 2Q4) (n = 115) or sham (n = 74). From week 24 to week 52, all patients received 2 mg intravitreal aflibercept as needed (IAI 2Q4 + PRN and sham + IAI PRN) according to retreatment criteria. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who gained ≥15 ETDRS letters from baseline at week 24. Additional endpoints included visual, anatomic, and quality-of-life NEI VFQ-25 outcomes at weeks 24 and 52.At week 24, 56.1% of IAI 2Q4 patients gained ≥15 letters from baseline compared with 12.3% of sham patients (P.001). At week 52, 55.3% of IAI 2Q4 + PRN patients gained ≥15 letters compared with 30.1% of sham + IAI PRN patients (P.001). At week 52, IAI 2Q4 + PRN patients gained a mean of 16.2 letters of vision vs 3.8 letters for sham + IAI PRN (P.001). The most common adverse events for both groups were conjunctival hemorrhage, eye pain, reduced visual acuity, and increased intraocular pressure.Monthly injections of 2 mg intravitreal aflibercept for patients with macular edema secondary to CRVO resulted in a statistically significant improvement in visual acuity at week 24, which was largely maintained through week 52 with intravitreal aflibercept PRN dosing. Intravitreal aflibercept injection was generally well tolerated.

To assess the efficacy and safety of intravitreal vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) Trap-Eye in eyes with macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).Multicenter, randomized, prospective, controlled trial.One hundred eighty-nine eyes with macular edema secondary to CRVO.Eyes were randomized 3:2 to receive VEGF Trap-Eye 2 mg or sham injection monthly for 6 months.The proportion of eyes with a ≥15-letter gain or more in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at week 24 (primary efficacy end point), mean changes in BCVA and central retinal thickness (CRT), and proportion of eyes progressing to neovascularization of the anterior segment, optic disc, or elsewhere in the retina.At week 24, 56.1% of VEGF Trap-Eye treated eyes gained 15 letters or more from baseline versus 12.3% of sham-treated eyes (P0.001). The VEGF Trap-Eye treated eyes gained a mean of 17.3 letters versus sham-treated eyes, which lost 4.0 letters (P0.001). Central retinal thickness decreased by 457.2 μm in eyes treated with VEGF Trap-Eye versus 144.8 μm in sham-treated eyes (P0.001), and progression to any neovascularization occurred in 0 and 5 (6.8%) of eyes treated with VEGF Trap-Eye and sham-treated eyes, respectively (P = 0.006). Conjunctival hemorrhage, reduced visual acuity, and eye pain were the most common adverse events (AEs). Serious ocular AEs were reported by 3.5% of VEGF Trap-Eye patients and 13.5% of sham patients. Incidences of nonocular serious AEs generally were well balanced between both groups.At 24 weeks, monthly intravitreal injection of VEGF Trap-Eye 2 mg in eyes with macular edema resulting from CRVO improved visual acuity and CRT, eliminated progression resulting from neovascularization, and was associated with a low rate of ocular AEs related to treatment.

To evaluate anatomic outcomes and vision, injection frequency, and safety during the as-needed (PRN) treatment phase of a study evaluating a 12-week fixed dosing period followed by PRN dosing to week 52 with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) Trap-Eye for neovascular (wet) age-related macular degeneration (AMD).Multicenter, randomized, double-masked trial.We included 159 patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to wet AMD.Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 5 intravitreal VEGF Trap-Eye treatment groups: 0.5 mg or 2 mg every 4 weeks or 0.5, 2, or 4 mg every 12 weeks during the fixed-dosing period (weeks 1-12). From weeks 16 to 52, patients were evaluated monthly and were retreated PRN with their assigned dose (0.5, 2, or 4 mg).Change in central retinal/lesion thickness (CR/LT), change in total lesion and CNV size, mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), proportion of patients with 15-letter loss or gain, time to first PRN injection, reinjection frequency, and safety at week 52.The decrease in CR/LT at week 12 versus baseline remained significant at weeks 12 to 52 (-130 μm from baseline at week 52) and CNV size regressed from baseline by 2.21 mm(2) at 48 weeks. After achieving a significant improvement in BCVA during the 12-week, fixed-dosing phase for all groups combined, PRN dosing for 40 weeks maintained improvements in BCVA to 52 weeks (5.3-letter gain; P0.0001). The most robust improvements and consistent maintenance of visual acuity generally occurred in patients initially dosed with 2 mg every 4 weeks for 12 weeks, demonstrating a gain of 9 letters at 52 weeks. Overall, a mean of 2 injections was administered after the 12-week fixed-dosing phase, and the mean time to first reinjection was 129 days; 19% of patients received no injections and 45% received 1 or 2 injections. Treatment with VEGF Trap-Eye was generally safe and well tolerated, with few ocular or systemic adverse events.PRN dosing with VEGF Trap-Eye at weeks 16-52 maintained the significant anatomic and vision improvements established during the 12-week fixed-dosing phase with a low frequency of reinjections. Repeated dosing with VEGF Trap-Eye was well tolerated over 52 weeks of treatment.Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

To evaluate the biologic effects and safety of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) Trap-Eye during a 12-week fixed-dosing period in patients with neovascular (wet) age-related macular degeneration (AMD).Multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-masked clinical trial with initial 12-week fixed dosing period. Data were analyzed to week 16.We included 159 patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to wet AMD.Patients were randomized 1:1:1:1:1 to VEGF Trap-Eye during the fixed-dosing phase (day 1 to week 12): 0.5 or 2 mg every 4 weeks (0.5 mg q4wk, 2 mg q4wk) on day 1 and at weeks 4, 8, and 12; or 0.5, 2, or 4 mg every 12 weeks (0.5 mg q12wk, 2 mg q12wk, or 4 mg q12wk) on day 1 and at week 12.The primary endpoint was change from baseline in central retinal/lesion thickness (CR/LT) at week 12; secondary outcomes included change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), proportion of patients with a gain of ≥ 15 letters, proportion of patients with a loss of15 letters, and safety.At week 12, treatment with VEGF Trap-Eye resulted in a significant mean decrease in CR/LT of 119 μm from baseline in all groups combined (P0.0001). The reduction in CR/LT with the 2 mg q4wk and 0.5mg q4wk regimens was significantly greater than each of the quarterly dosing regimens. The BCVA increased significantly by a mean of 5.7 letters at 12 weeks in the combined group (P0.0001), with the greatest mean gain of8 letters in the monthly dosing groups. At 8 weeks, BCVA improvements were similar with 2 mg q4wk and 2 mg q12wk dosing. After the last required dose at week 12, CR/LT and visual acuity were maintained or further improved at week 16 in all treatment groups. Ocular adverse events were mild and consistent with safety profiles reported for other intraocular anti-VEGF treatments.Repeated monthly intravitreal dosing of VEGF Trap-Eye over 12 weeks demonstrated significant reductions in retinal thickness and improvements in visual acuity, and was well-tolerated in patients with neovascular AMD.Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Purpose To determine whether different doses and dosing regimens of intravitreal vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) Trap-Eye are superior to focal/grid photocoagulation in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME). Design Multicenter, randomized, double-masked, phase 2 clinical trial. Participants A total of 221 diabetic patients with clinically significant macular edema involving the central macula. Methods Patients were assigned to 1 of 5 treatment regimens: 0.5 mg VEGF Trap-Eye every 4 weeks; 2 mg VEGF Trap-Eye every 4 weeks; 2 mg VEGF Trap-Eye for 3 initial monthly doses and then every 8 weeks; 2 mg VEGF Trap-Eye for 3 initial monthly doses and then on an as-needed (PRN) basis; or macular laser photocoagulation. Assessments were completed at baseline and every 4 weeks thereafter. Main Outcome Measures Mean change in visual acuity and central retinal thickness (CRT) at 24 weeks. Results Patients in the 4 VEGF Trap-Eye groups experienced mean visual acuity benefits ranging from +8.5 to +11.4 Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters versus only +2.5 letters in the laser group ( P ≤ 0.0085 for each VEGF Trap-Eye group vs. laser). Gains from baseline of 0+, 10+, and 15+ letters were seen in up to 93%, 64%, and 34% of VEGF Trap-Eye groups versus up to 68%, 32%, and 21% in the laser group, respectively. Mean reductions in CRT in the 4 VEGF Trap-Eye groups ranged from −127.3 to −194.5 μm compared with only −67.9 μm in the laser group ( P = 0.0066 for each VEGF Trap-Eye group vs. laser). VEGF Trap-Eye was generally well tolerated. Ocular adverse events in patients treated with VEGF Trap-Eye were generally consistent with those seen with other intravitreal anti-VEGF agents. Conclusions Intravitreal VEGF Trap-Eye produced a statistically significant and clinically relevant improvement in visual acuity when compared with macular laser photocoagulation in patients with DME. Financial Disclosure(s) Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) for the treatment of macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). Design Randomized, double-masked, phase 3 trial. Participants A total of 188 patients with macular edema secondary to CRVO. Methods Patients received IAI 2 mg (IAI 2Q4) (n = 114) or sham injections (n = 74) every 4 weeks up to week 24. During weeks 24 to 52, patients from both arms were evaluated monthly and received IAI as needed, or pro re nata (PRN) (IAI 2Q4 + PRN and sham + IAI PRN). During weeks 52 to 100, patients were evaluated at least quarterly and received IAI PRN. Main Outcome Measures The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients who gained ≥15 letters in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to week 24. This study reports week 100 results. Results The proportion of patients gaining ≥15 letters was 56.1% versus 12.3% ( P P P P P P P P = 0.546), and 390.0 versus 343.3 μm at week 100 ( P = 0.366) in the IAI 2Q4 + PRN and sham + IAI PRN groups, respectively. The mean number (standard deviation) of PRN injections in the IAI 2Q4 + PRN and sham + IAI PRN groups was 2.7±1.7 versus 3.9±2.0 during weeks 24 to 52 and 3.3±2.1 versus 2.9±2.0 during weeks 52 to 100, respectively. The most frequent ocular serious adverse event from baseline to week 100 was vitreous hemorrhage (0.9% vs. 6.8% in the IAI 2Q4 + PRN and sham + IAI PRN groups, respectively). Conclusions The visual and anatomic improvements after fixed dosing through week 24 and PRN dosing with monthly monitoring from weeks 24 to 52 were diminished after continued PRN dosing, with a reduced monitoring frequency from weeks 52 to 100.

During a critical period in leech embryogenesis, the sex nerves that connect the 5th and 6th midbody ganglia (MG5 and MG6) to the primordium of the male sexual organ carry a spatially localized signal that induces the birth of several hundred neurons specific to these ganglia. We examined particular cellular elements (afferents, efferents, non-neuronal components) within these nerves as potential conveyors of the inductive signal. We show that axons of peripheral sensory neurons in the male genitalia travel along the sex nerves and into MG5 and MG6, but reach the CNS after the critical period has elapsed and cannot, therefore, be involved in the induction. Of the six sex nerves, four contain non-neuronal cells that span the entire distance between the male genitalia and the sex ganglia. However, when male genitalia were transplanted to ectopic locations close to MG6, induction occurred frequently but only in MG6, mediated by ectopic nerves that do not contain these cells. Thus, non-neuronal cells specific to the normal sex nerves are not necessary for induction. In addition, dye injections into the target during the critical period failed to reveal migrating cells in the sex nerves that could convey the inductive signal to the CNS. Finally, we show that 11 pairs of central neurons in each ganglion project to the male organ early during the critical period. In the adult, at least 3 additional pairs of neurons in MG6 also innervate this target. We conclude that the only components of the sex nerves that connect the sex ganglia to the target during the critical period that could be associated with induced central mitogenesis are the axons of central neurons that innervate the male genitalia.

Purpose To determine the safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose, and bioactivity of an intravitreal injection of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) Trap-Eye, a fusion protein of binding domains from human VEGF receptors 1 and 2 with human immunoglobulin-G Fc that binds VEGF family members, in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Design Dose-escalation, multicenter, interventional clinical trial. Participants Twenty-one patients (13 female, 8 male) with neovascular AMD (NVAMD) and lesions ≤12 disc areas in size and ≥50% active choroidal neovascularization (CNV) with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≤20/40 received a single intraocular injection of 0.05 mg (n = 3), 0.15 mg (n = 3), 0.5 mg (n = 3), 1 mg (n = 6), 2 mg (n = 3), or 4 mg (n = 3) of VEGF Trap-Eye. Methods Safety assessments included eye examinations, vital signs, and laboratory tests. Measures of bioactivity included changes from baseline in BCVA, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and fluorescein angiography. The primary end point was 6 weeks and patients were followed up for 12 weeks. Main Outcome Measure Safety assessments. Results There were no serious adverse events and no identifiable intraocular inflammation. The mean decrease in excess foveal thickness for all patients was 104.5 μm at 6 weeks, and the mean increase in visual acuity was 4.43 letters. In the 2 highest dose groups combined (2 and 4 mg), the mean increase in BCVA was 13.5 letters, with 3 of 6 patients demonstrating improvement of ≥3 lines and 3 patients requiring no adjunctive treatment of any type for 12 weeks. Some showed elimination of fluorescein leakage and reduction in area of CNV. Conclusions Intravitreal injection of up to 4 mg of VEGF Trap-Eye in patients with NVAMD was well tolerated with no evidence of ocular inflammation. Although the number of patients in each cohort was small, there was evidence of bioactivity, because several patients, especially those receiving 2 or 4 mg of VEGF Trap-Eye, showed substantial improvement in BCVA associated with reductions in foveal thickness. Phase III trials to investigate the efficacy of intraocular VEGF Trap-Eye in patients with NVAMD are under way. Financial Disclosure(s) Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.