Search

Introduction Chronic periodontal diseases can lead to bone defects and tooth loss, making accurate diagnosis essential for treatment. Various methods are used for diagnosing furcation involvement, with clinical examination and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) being the most effective. CBCT produces reliable images with submillimeter resolution, revealing marginal bone contours and furcation defects. Limited studies show that CBCT is more precise than clinical detection for diagnosing furcation involvement. Therefore, CBCT technology can be considered as an adjunct method for furcation involvement detection. This study tests the accuracy and efficiency of CBCT and clinical examination in detecting furcation involvement. Material and methods The study included 25 patients (68 molars) with generalized periodontitis of stage II to IV, Grade B and C. Inclusion criteria required at least two intrabony defects with probing depth > 6mm in both jaws and criteria of periodontitis in at least 30% of the teeth present. Results The study compared clinical examination and CBCT readings for measuring maxillary and mandibular teeth furcation involvement. The results show significant differences between clinical and CBCT measurements of maxillary teeth furcation involvement, particularly in specific areas and types of furcation involvement. In contrast, there were significant differences between clinical and CBCT readings for only a few measurements of mandibular teeth furcation involvement. Therefore, the study suggests that CBCT imaging may be beneficial for accurate diagnosis and treatment planning in cases of furcation involvement in maxillary teeth. Conclusion CBCT imaging is a reliable adjunct method for detecting furcation involvement in maxillary teeth, while clinical examination alone may not be sufficient. Therefore, the use of CBCT technology should be considered in cases where accurate detection of furcation involvement is necessary for successful treatment outcomes. However, further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these findings., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2024, Alotaibi et al.)