Search

Introduction: The ability to allocate visual attention is known to be impaired in patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). In the present study, we investigated a possible neural correlate of this cognitive deficit by examining the pupil response of patients with mTBI whilst performing a modified Posner visual search task., Method: Two experiments were conducted in which the target location was either not cued (Experiment 1) or cued (Experiment 2). Additionally, in Experiment 2, the type of cue (endogenous vs exogenous cue) and cue validity were treated as independent variables. In both experiments, search efficiency was varied by changing shape similarity between target and distractor patterns. The reaction time required to judge whether the target was present or absent and pupil dilation metrics, particularly the pupil dilation latency (PDL) and amplitude (PDA), were measured. Thirteen patients with chronic mTBI and 21 age-, sex-, and IQ -matched controls participated in the study., Results: In Experiment 1, patients with mTBI displayed a similar PDA for both efficient and inefficient search conditions, while control participants had a significantly larger PDA in inefficient search conditions compared to efficient search conditions. As cognitive load is positively correlated with PDA, our findings suggest that mTBI patients were unable to apply more mental effort whilst performing visual search, particularly if the task is difficult when visual search is inefficient. In Experiment 2, when the target location was cued, patients with mTBI displayed no significant pupil dilation response to the target regardless of the efficiency of the search, nor whether the cue was valid or invalid. These results contrasted with control participants, who were additionally sensitive to the validity of the cue in which PDA was smaller for cue-valid conditions than invalid conditions, particularly for efficient search conditions., Conclusion: Pupillometry provided further evidence of attention allocation deficits following mTBI.

Visual attentional deficits are frequently reported in patients with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). In the present study, the ability to orient visual attention (i.e., the use of endogenous and exogenous visual cues) was investigated using a modified Posner visual search task, in which the participant was required to search for a target shape (radial frequency patterns) amongst distractor shapes. Participants were required to determine whether a target radial frequency pattern was present or absent from an array of distractors. Attention to the target location was cued using central or peripheral cueing procedures to investigate endogenous or exogenous attention allocation. Predictability was not manipulated between central and peripheral cues. Search difficulty was varied by systematically changing the radial frequency difference between target and distractors (and thereby shape difference), and cues could be valid or invalid in that they correctly or incorrectly indicated the position of the target shape. Both target discriminability (i.e., identifying the presence or absence of the target) and reaction times were measured. Thirteen patients with chronic mild TBI and 21 age-, sex-, and IQ -matched healthy controls participated in the study. For control participants, both discrimination accuracy and reaction times improved with visual search efficiency, and they were sensitive to the type of cue, with performance worst for cue invalid conditions than valid conditions. However, the results for TBI patients were strikingly different; we find that discrimination accuracy slightly improved with visual search difficulty (compared to controls), but not reaction times, and TBI patients were largely insensitive to the type of visual cue, and did not show a selective deficit for central or peripheral cues, suggesting an impairment in both endogenous and exogenous visual attention. In conclusion, patients with mild TBI exhibit a poor ability to orient visual attention., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Difficulty in the ability to allocate and maintain visual attention is frequently reported by patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). In the present study, we used a multiple object tracking (MOT) task to investigate the degree to which TBI affects the allocation and maintenance of visual attention to multiple moving targets. Fifteen adults with mild TBI and 20 control participants took part in this study. All participants were matched for age, gender, and IQ. The sensitivity and time taken to perform the MOT task were measured for different conditions in which the duration of the tracking, number of target, and distractor dots were systematically varied. When the number of target dots required to be tracked increased, sensitivity in correctly detecting them decreased for both groups but was significantly greater for patients with mild TBI. Similarly, increasing the number of distractor dots had a greater effect on reducing task sensitivity for patients with mild TBI than control participants. Finally, across all conditions, poorer detection performance was observed for patients with mild TBI when the tracking duration was longer compared to control participants. The present study showed that patients with mild TBI have greater deficits (compared to control participants) in their ability to maintain visual attention on tracking multiple moving objects, which was particularly hindered by increased tracking load and distraction., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Purpose: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to understand the impact of traumatic brain injury (TBI) on visual attention and whether different components and processes of visual attention (such as selective, sustained, divided, and covert orientation of visual attention) are affected following brain injury., Methods: A literature search between January 1980 to May 2021 was conducted using Medline, Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases was undertaken for studies that assessed visual attention using different tasks that target specific or multiple components of visual attention. Three hundred twenty-nine potentially relevant articles were identified, and 20 studies met our inclusion criteria., Results: A total of 123 effect sizes (ES) were estimated from 20 studies that included 519 patients with TBI and 530 normal participants. The overall combined ES was statistically significant and large (ES = 0.92), but with high heterogeneity (Q = 614.83, p < 0.0001, I2 = 80.32%). Subgroup analysis showed that the impact of TBI severity, with the ES for moderate-severe TBI significantly higher than mild TBI (t (112) = 3.11, p = 0.002). Additionally, the component of visual attention was differentially affected by TBI (F (2, 120) = 10.25, p<0.0001); the ES for selective attention (ES = 1.13) and covert orientation of visual attention (ES = 1.14) were large, whilst for sustained attention, the ES was medium at 0.43. A subgroup analysis comparing outcome measures showed that reaction time (ES = 1.12) was significantly more affected compared to performance accuracy (ES = 0.43), F (1, 96) = 25.98, p<0.0001)., Conclusion: Large and significant deficits in visual attention was found following TBI which can last for years after the initial injury. However, different components of visual attention were not affected to the same extent, with selective visual attention and orientation of visual attention most affected following TBI., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Cortical visual processing involves the ventral stream (form perception) and the dorsal stream (motion perception). We assessed whether mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) differentially affects these two streams. Eleven adults with mild TBI (28 ± 9 yrs, 17 ± 5 months post injury) and 25 controls (25 ± 5 yrs) participated. Participants completed tests of global processing involving Glass patterns (form) and random dot kinematograms (motion), measurement of contrast thresholds for motion direction discrimination, a comprehensive vision screening and the Post-Concussion Symptom Inventory (PCSI). Our results showed that the mild TBI group had significantly higher (worse) global form (mean ± SD: TBI 25 ± 6%, control 21 ± 5%) and motion (TBI 14 ± 7%, control 11 ± 3%) coherence thresholds than controls. The magnitude of the mild TBI group deficit did not differ between the two tasks. Contrast thresholds for motion direction discrimination did not differ between the groups, but were positively correlated with PCSI score (r 2 = 0.51. p = 0.01) in the mild TBI group. The mild TBI group had worse outcomes than controls for all clinical measurements of vision except distance visual acuity. In conclusion, mild TBI affects processing in both the dorsal and ventral cortical processing streams equally. In addition, spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity may be related to the symptoms of mild TBI.