Search

Introduction: Severe forms of COVID-19, the disease caused by SARS-CoV-2, are characterized by acute respiratory distress syndrome, robust lung inflammation and death in some patients. Strong evidence has been accumulating that polymorphonuclear neutrophilic granulocytes (PMN) play an important role in the pathophysiology of severe COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 directly induces in vitro PMN activation, mainly the release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). However, the viral components inducing this PMN response remain unclear. Methods: In this work human PMN responses were assessed in vitro in response to the spike (S) protein of two different SARS-CoV-2 variants, anti-S IgG1 antibodies or immune complexes formed by them. Production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) was measured by Diogenes-based chemiluminescence. Release of myeloperoxidase (MPO) was assessed by ELISA while secretion of a list of cytokines and growth factors was determined by high-performance multiplex cytokine assay. Results and discussion: We show that the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant S protein and anti-spike IgG1, either alone or together, stimulate ROS production in human PMNs. We also observed that the SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan S protein and anti-S IgG1 antibody together triggerMPO release from PMNs. Based on the relevance of SARSCoV-2 and influenza co-infections, we have also investigated the impact of influenza virus infection on the previous PMN responses to S proteins or anti-S antibodies. We did not detect any significant effect of influenza co-infection on ROS generation in PMNs. Our data also show that PMN stimulation by S proteins induced the release of different chemokines, growth factors, regulatory and proinflammatory cytokines. Overall, our findings show that the SARS-CoV-2 S protein, an anti-spike IgG1 antibody or their immune complex, promote oxidative responses of PMNs in a variant-dependent manner, contributing to a better understanding of the role of PMN responses during SARS-CoV-2 infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: SARS-CoV-2 vaccines production and distribution enabled the return to normalcy worldwide, but it was not fast enough to avoid the emergence of variants capable of evading immune response induced by prior infections and vaccination. This study evaluated, against Omicron sublineages BA.1, BA.5 and BQ.1.1, the antibody response of a cohort vaccinated with a two doses CoronaVac protocol and followed by two heterologous booster doses., Methods: To assess vaccination effectiveness, serum samples were collected from 160 individuals, in 3 different time points (9, 12 and 18 months after CoronaVac protocol). For each time point, individuals were divided into 3 subgroups, based on the number of additional doses received (No booster, 1 booster and 2 boosters), and a viral microneutralization assay was performed to evaluate neutralization titers and seroconvertion rate., Results: The findings presented here show that, despite the first booster, at 9m time point, improved neutralization level against omicron ancestor BA.1 (133.1 to 663.3), this trend was significantly lower for BQ.1.1 and BA.5 (132.4 to 199.1, 63.2 to 100.2, respectively). However, at 18m time point, the administration of a second booster dose considerably improved the antibody neutralization, and this was observed not only against BA.1 (2361.5), but also against subvariants BQ.1.1 (726.1) and BA.5 (659.1). Additionally, our data showed that, after first booster, seroconvertion rate for BA.5 decayed over time (93.3% at 12m to 68.4% at 18m), but after the second booster, seroconvertion was completely recovered (95% at 18m)., Discussion: Our study reinforces the concerns about immunity evasion of the SARS-CoV-2 omicron subvariants, where BA.5 and BQ.1.1 were less neutralized by vaccine induced antibodies than BA.1. On the other hand, the administration of a second booster significantly enhanced antibody neutralization capacity against these subvariants. It is likely that, as new SARS-CoV-2 subvariants continue to emerge, additional immunizations will be needed over time., Competing Interests: MN has received research grants from Instituto Butantan, Janssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V., Medicago R&D Inc, and Pfizer/BioNTech SE. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Campos, Almeida, Filgueiras, Corsini, Gomes, de Miranda, de Assis, Silva, Alves, Fernandes, de Oliveira, Rahal, Grenfell and Nogueira.)