Search

Background: Although many techniques for the surgical treatment of scoliosis have been described, we are not aware of any randomized trials that have compared implant systems. The relationship between surgeons' preferences for implants and patient outcomes is unknown. The purpose of the present study was to compare quality of life and curve correction associated with use of the Moss Miami system and the Universal Spine System for spinal fusion in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.Methods: The present study was a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. All adolescent patients with idiopathic scoliosis who were scheduled for posterior instrumentation and arthrodesis with or without anterior release were screened for eligibility. Patients were randomly allocated to treatment with either the Moss Miami system or the Universal Spine System. The primary outcome measure for this trial was Quality of Life Profile for Spinal Disorders.Results: Of the 129 subjects who were enrolled in the trial, sixty (95%) of sixty-three from the Universal Spine System group and sixty (91%) of sixty-six from the Moss Miami group were included in the final analysis. Two years postoperatively, the total Quality of Life score did not differ by the clinically important value of 5.5 between the two groups (difference, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, -3.67 to 5.82; p = 0.66). The percentage of Cobb angle correction was not significantly different for thoracic curves (55.1% +/- 18.3% for the Moss Miami system group, compared with 54.1% +/- 18.7% for the Universal Spine System group) (difference, -1%; 95% confidence interval, -7% to 5%; p = 0.77) or lumbar curves (45.4% +/- 24.6% for the Moss Miami system group, compared with 41.9% +/- 26.8% for the Universal Spine System group) (difference, -4%; 95% confidence interval, -16% to 11%; p = 0.57). Although surgeons were more satisfied with the Universal Spine System (difference, 42%; 95% confidence interval, 29% to 55%; p < 0.0001), satisfaction ratings were not related to any surgical outcomes.Conclusions: The Moss Miami system and the Universal Spine Systems provided similar quality of life and curve correction. Surgeon preference may be an unreliable means of selecting implants from the patient outcomes perspective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Traditional recommendations hold that open fractures in both children and adults require urgent surgical debridement for a number of reasons, including the preservation of soft-tissue viability and vascular status as well as the prevention of infection. Following the widespread use of early administration of antibiotics, a number of single-institution studies challenged the belief that urgent surgical debridement decreases the risk of acute infection.Methods: We performed a retrospective, multicenter study of open fractures that had been treated at six tertiary pediatric medical centers between 1989 and 2000. The standard protocol at each medical center was for all children to be given intravenous antibiotics upon arrival in the emergency department. The medical records of all children with open fractures were reviewed to identify the location of the fracture, the interval between the injury and the time of surgery, the Gustilo and Anderson classification, and the occurrence of acute infection.Results: The analysis included 554 open fractures in 536 consecutive patients who were eighteen years of age or younger. The overall infection rate was 3% (sixteen of 554). The infection rate was 3% (twelve of 344) for fractures that had been treated within six hours after the injury, compared with 2% (four of 210) for those that had been treated at least seven hours after the injury; this difference was not significant (p = 0.43). When the fractures were separated according to the Gustilo and Anderson classification system, there were no significant differences in the infection rate between those that had been treated within six hours after the injury and those that had been treated at least seven hours after the injury. Specifically, these infection rates were 2% (three of 173) and 2% (two of 129), respectively, for type-I fractures, 3% (three of 110) and 0% (zero of forty-four), respectively, for type-II fractures, and 10% (six of sixty-one) and 2% (two of thirty-seven), respectively, for type-III fractures (p > 0.05 for all three comparisons).Conclusions: In the present retrospective, multicenter study of children with Gustilo and Anderson type-I, II, and III open fractures, the rates of acute infection were similar regardless of whether surgery was performed within six hours after the injury or at least seven hours after the injury. The findings of the present study suggest that, in children who receive early antibiotic therapy following an open fracture, surgical debridement within six hours after the injury offers little benefit over debridement within twenty-four hours after the injury with regard to the prevention of acute infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]